20.07.2013 Views

Wake County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted ...

Wake County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted ...

Wake County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 1 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

<strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong><br />

<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>or</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> (AIG) Plan<br />

Effective 2010-2013<br />

Approved by local Board of Education on:<br />

LEA Superintendent’s Name: Donna Hargens<br />

LEA AIG Contact Name: Joyce Gardner<br />

Submitted to NC Department of Public Instruction on:<br />

<strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> has developed this local AIG plan based on the NC AIG Program Standards<br />

(adopted by SBE, July 2009). These Standards serve as a statewide framew<strong>or</strong>k and guide LEAs to<br />

develop, co<strong>or</strong>dinate and implement thoughtful and comprehensive AIG programs.<br />

The NC AIG Program Standards encompass six principle standards with accompanying practices.<br />

These standards articulate the expectations f<strong>or</strong> quality, comprehensive, and effective local AIG<br />

programs and relate to the categ<strong>or</strong>ies related to NC’s AIG legislation, Article 9B (N. C. G. S. 115C-<br />

150.5). These best practices help to clarify the standard, describe what an LEA should have in place,<br />

and guide LEAs to improve their programs.<br />

As LEAs transition to the new AIG Program Standards, every LEA participated in a self-assessment<br />

process of their local AIG program, which involved multiple stakeholders. The data gathered during<br />

this process guided LEAs in their development of this local AIG plan f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013. This local AIG<br />

plan has been approved by the LEA’s board of Education and sent to NC DPI f<strong>or</strong> comment.<br />

F<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013, <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> local AIG plan is as follows:<br />

<strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> Vision f<strong>or</strong> local AIG program: The <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> (AIG)<br />

Program provides an appropriately challenging education f<strong>or</strong> students who perf<strong>or</strong>m, <strong>or</strong> show potential<br />

f<strong>or</strong> perf<strong>or</strong>ming at remarkably high levels of accomplishment when compared to others of their age,<br />

experience, <strong>or</strong> environment.<br />

Classroom teachers and AIG teachers collab<strong>or</strong>ate to provide learning opp<strong>or</strong>tunities that engage,<br />

challenge, interest, stimulate and motivate students. Curricula and instructional practices are<br />

modified to provide consistent opp<strong>or</strong>tunities that are rich and rig<strong>or</strong>ous f<strong>or</strong> gifted students in all<br />

classes. Every eff<strong>or</strong>t is made to match appropriate opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> challenge with the needs of<br />

students. There is the expectation of excellence, equity, and focus on learning and teaching.<br />

Research based models of service delivery are available f<strong>or</strong> gifted learners in each school. Students<br />

experience differentiated instructional opp<strong>or</strong>tunities rich with rig<strong>or</strong> and complexity, thus creating<br />

challenging opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> optimal student growth.<br />

Sources of funding f<strong>or</strong> local AIG program (as of 2010)<br />

State Funding <strong>Local</strong> Funding Grant Funding Other Funding<br />

$6911923.00 $1087922.00 $.00 $.00


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 2 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.<br />

Practice A<br />

Articulates and disseminates clear, comprehensive, and equitable screening, referral, and<br />

identification processes f<strong>or</strong> all grade levels to school personnel, parents/families, students, and the<br />

community-at-large.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Nomination, referral, screening and identification of students with needs f<strong>or</strong> gifted program<br />

services are detailed in the current plan. However, feedback from parents, administrat<strong>or</strong>s and other<br />

stakeholders indicate a need f<strong>or</strong> greater clarity and less technical terminology in the description of<br />

these procedures.<br />

Goals: Improve clarity and ease of access to clear inf<strong>or</strong>mation regarding the identification processes.<br />

Description:<br />

• WCPSS AIG Web Page, video link on web page<br />

• Listserv f<strong>or</strong> Parents of <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> children f<strong>or</strong> updates and communication<br />

• AIG Program Brochure<br />

• AIG Parent Guide<br />

• AIG School Service Delivery Plan<br />

• Parent Presentations<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Redesigned AIG Program Brochure and Parent Guide (paper and on website)<br />

• Links to AIG Program website and inf<strong>or</strong>mation posted on each school's website<br />

• Listserv f<strong>or</strong> parents used by AIG Program central services staff to disseminate inf<strong>or</strong>mation directly to<br />

parents<br />

• AIG Resource Teachers' schedule of parents meeting sessions submitted to AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong><br />

with dates f<strong>or</strong> beginning of school year<br />

• AIG program video posted online f<strong>or</strong> parent inf<strong>or</strong>mation and use by AIG teachers in parent meeting<br />

presentations<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 3 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice B<br />

Employs multiple criteria f<strong>or</strong> student identification, including measures that reveal student aptitude,<br />

student achievement, <strong>or</strong> potential to achieve in <strong>or</strong>der to develop a comprehensive profile f<strong>or</strong> each<br />

student.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Multiple criteria ensure that gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s are recognized in the identification process.<br />

Goals: To research and expl<strong>or</strong>e options in identification criteria over a one year period.<br />

Description: <strong>Gifted</strong> education is provided f<strong>or</strong> students who consistently perf<strong>or</strong>m above grade level<br />

and demonstrate need f<strong>or</strong> additional rig<strong>or</strong>ous academic differentiation in kindergarten through grade<br />

twelve.<br />

Multiple criteria include both f<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong>s and inf<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

F<strong>or</strong>mal identification criteria include: n<strong>or</strong>m referenced assessments in aptitude, reading/language<br />

arts, and mathematics.<br />

Inf<strong>or</strong>mal identification criteria may include: teacher and parent checklists, academic grades in<br />

reading/language arts and mathematics, writing samples, N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina End-of-Grade and N<strong>or</strong>th<br />

Carolina End-of-Course tests, Literacy Profiles, Math Profiles, p<strong>or</strong>tfolios, w<strong>or</strong>k samples, and projects,<br />

plus any other available anecdotal inf<strong>or</strong>mation.<br />

STEP 1 - Nomination:<br />

• Students in kindergarten through grade three (first semester) may be nominated f<strong>or</strong> early<br />

identification.<br />

• There must be documented evidence of need f<strong>or</strong> differentiated curricula and instruction that is<br />

consistently two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e grade levels above the current grade.<br />

• The SBC-GE will submit the perf<strong>or</strong>mance data to AIG Central Services Committee f<strong>or</strong> review and<br />

approval.<br />

Students in grades four through twelve may be nominated by parent, teachers <strong>or</strong> other school<br />

personnel f<strong>or</strong> referral to the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education at any time with<br />

demonstrated above grade level perf<strong>or</strong>mance. Students may self-nominate.<br />

STEP 1a - Screening (Grade 3 second semester):<br />

The Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT), a measure of aptitude, is administered to all third graders<br />

during the second semester. Students who attain a composite <strong>or</strong> subtest sc<strong>or</strong>e at <strong>or</strong> above the 75th<br />

percentile will be eligible to take the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), a measure of achievement.<br />

Students who sc<strong>or</strong>e at the 90th percentile on either the CogAT <strong>or</strong> ITBS will be considered f<strong>or</strong><br />

nomination to the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education.<br />

STEP 2 - Referral:<br />

The School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE) considers all nominations. The<br />

committee reviews available student data and documentation based on f<strong>or</strong>mal and inf<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong>s<br />

and determines which of the nominated students will be referred.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 4 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Grades K-2 and Grade 3 (first semester):<br />

The SBC-GE will review a p<strong>or</strong>tfolio which includes above grade level math and literacy profile cards<br />

with evidence of perf<strong>or</strong>mance two to three grade levels above age level peers. Evidence could<br />

include dated anecdotal notes to supp<strong>or</strong>t the profile card sc<strong>or</strong>ing, writing samples, and math and<br />

science learning logs. If the SBC-GE determines the p<strong>or</strong>tfolio demonstrates the student's<br />

perf<strong>or</strong>mance 2-3 grade levels above age level peers, the p<strong>or</strong>tfolio and supp<strong>or</strong>ting documentation are<br />

submitted to the Administrative Review Committee f<strong>or</strong> review to determine if the referral is<br />

appropriate.<br />

Referred students are scheduled f<strong>or</strong> a psychological evaluation including cognitive and achievement<br />

assessments. Students are scheduled by the AIG psychologist in the <strong>or</strong>der that the referrals are<br />

received.<br />

Grades 4-12 and grade 3 (second semester):<br />

Referred students are scheduled f<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong>mal assessment in aptitude (Cognitive Abilities Test-CogAT)<br />

and achievement (Iowa Test of Basic Skills-ITBS) during established testing windows.<br />

The School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education collects student data, which may include teacher<br />

and parent checklists, academic grades in reading/language arts and mathematics, writing samples,<br />

End-of-Grade and End-of-Course tests, literacy and mathematics profiles, w<strong>or</strong>k samples, projects and<br />

additional inf<strong>or</strong>mation contained in the p<strong>or</strong>tfolio. The SBCGE will review all p<strong>or</strong>tfolios f<strong>or</strong><br />

demonstrated above grade level perf<strong>or</strong>mance. The data is rec<strong>or</strong>ded on the Individual Student Profile.<br />

Required F<strong>or</strong>mal Indicat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> Identification:<br />

1. Percentile sc<strong>or</strong>e of 90 <strong>or</strong> higher on n<strong>or</strong>m referenced aptitude <strong>or</strong> ability tests AND<br />

2. Percentile sc<strong>or</strong>e of 90 <strong>or</strong> higher on n<strong>or</strong>m referenced achievement tests in reading and/<strong>or</strong><br />

mathematics.<br />

Required Inf<strong>or</strong>mal Indicat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> Identification:<br />

1. Teacher Checklist(s) that indicate gifted characteristics in academic areas.<br />

2. Parent Checklist(s) that indicate gifted characteristics in academic areas.<br />

3. P<strong>or</strong>tfolios that demonstrate multiple above grade level w<strong>or</strong>k products, rubrics, and reflections within<br />

one <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e specific academic areas at the student’s highest level of perf<strong>or</strong>mance.<br />

The SBCGE may recommend the administration of one individual standardized test when:<br />

• One f<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong> is at <strong>or</strong> above 90% but the other f<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong> is below 90% AND<br />

• Student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio demonstrates perf<strong>or</strong>mance that is a minimum of one year above grade level. The<br />

student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio must include math and/<strong>or</strong> literacy profile cards and above grade level w<strong>or</strong>k samples.<br />

The individual test will be chosen to assess the f<strong>or</strong>mal area that is less than 90%.<br />

STEP 3 - Identification:<br />

The <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program identifies students in kindergarten through grade<br />

twelve.<br />

Students in kindergarten through grade 3 (first semester) may be identified as academically<br />

intellectually gifted if the following criteria are met:<br />

• Clear demonstration of need f<strong>or</strong> differentiated service from the AIG Program that is two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 5 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

grade levels above the current grade level AND<br />

• Cognitive/aptitude: total sc<strong>or</strong>e in the 98th percentile <strong>or</strong> higher AND<br />

• Achievement: total reading and/<strong>or</strong> mathematics sc<strong>or</strong>e in the 98th percentile <strong>or</strong> higher.<br />

Students in grades three (second semester) through grade twelve may be identified as academically<br />

intellectually gifted if the following criteria are met:<br />

• Cognitive/aptitude: total sc<strong>or</strong>e in the 90th percentile <strong>or</strong> higher AND<br />

• Achievement: total reading and/<strong>or</strong> mathematics sc<strong>or</strong>e in the 90th percentile <strong>or</strong> higher AND<br />

• P<strong>or</strong>tfolio supp<strong>or</strong>ted perf<strong>or</strong>mance that is one <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e grade levels above the current grade level<br />

The f<strong>or</strong>mal identification criteria include n<strong>or</strong>m referenced assessments in aptitude,<br />

reading/language arts, and mathematics, and the inf<strong>or</strong>mal identification criteria include, but are not<br />

limited to, teacher and parent checklists, academic grades in reading/language arts and mathematics,<br />

writing samples, N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina End-of-Grade and N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina End-of-Course tests, Literacy<br />

Profiles, Math Profiles, p<strong>or</strong>tfolios, w<strong>or</strong>k samples, and projects plus any other available inf<strong>or</strong>mation.<br />

Matching F<strong>or</strong>mal and Inf<strong>or</strong>mal Indicat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> Identification and Service Delivery:<br />

The SBCGE will use the following criteria to identify service levels using p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence in<br />

conjunction with f<strong>or</strong>mal test data:<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 98/99th percentile in BOTH cognitive and achievement measures with<br />

supp<strong>or</strong>ting w<strong>or</strong>k two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e grade levels above may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG <strong>or</strong><br />

STRONG level of service. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be two to three years above the student's current<br />

grade level f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG and one to two years above f<strong>or</strong> STRONG.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 98/99th percentile in a COGNITIVE measure, and between the 95-97th<br />

percentile in the achievement measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG <strong>or</strong><br />

STRONG level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be two to<br />

three years above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG and one to two years above<br />

f<strong>or</strong> STRONG.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 98/99th percentile in an ACHIEVEMENT measure, and between the 95-<br />

97th percentile in the aptitude measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG <strong>or</strong><br />

STRONG level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be two to<br />

three years above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> VERY STRONG and one to two years above<br />

f<strong>or</strong> STRONG.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 98/99th percentile in a COGNITIVE measure, and between the 90-94th<br />

percentile in the achievement measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> STRONG <strong>or</strong> MODERATE<br />

level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one to two years<br />

above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> STRONG and one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 98/99th percentile in an ACHIEVEMENT measure, and between the 90-<br />

94th percentile in the aptitude measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> STRONG <strong>or</strong> MODERATE<br />

level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one to two years<br />

above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> STRONG and one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 6 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 95-97th percentile on BOTH cognitive and achievement measures may<br />

be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> STRONG <strong>or</strong> MODERATE level of service based on an analysis of<br />

student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio and evidence of perf<strong>or</strong>mance. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one to two years above the<br />

student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> STRONG and one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 95/97th percentile in a COGNITIVE measure, and between the 90-94th<br />

percentile in the achievement measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> STRONG <strong>or</strong> MODERATE<br />

level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one to two years<br />

above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> STRONG and one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 95/97th percentile in an ACHIEVEMENT measure, and between the 90-<br />

94th percentile in the aptitude measure, may be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> STRONG <strong>or</strong> MODERATE<br />

level of service based on analysis of p<strong>or</strong>tfolio evidence. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one to two years<br />

above the student's current grade level f<strong>or</strong> STRONG and one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.<br />

Students with sc<strong>or</strong>es at the 90-94th percentile on BOTH cognitive and achievement measures may<br />

be identified with a need f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE level of service based on an analysis of student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio<br />

and evidence of perf<strong>or</strong>mance. Perf<strong>or</strong>mance should be one year above f<strong>or</strong> MODERATE.<br />

Very Strong Service Level: Profile of a Very Strong Need f<strong>or</strong> Differentiation<br />

Cognitive Demands of a Very Strong Program Level<br />

• Consistently generates and applies abstract reasoning ability<br />

• Earns Level 4 <strong>or</strong> A on rep<strong>or</strong>t cards and above grade level classroom assignments<br />

• Demonstrates mastery of the NC Standard Course of Study 2-3 years beyond age peers<br />

• Routinely produces independent w<strong>or</strong>k consistent with above indicat<strong>or</strong>s<br />

• Allows f<strong>or</strong> rapid pace of instruction<br />

• Includes very difficult learning materials and tasks<br />

• Emphasizes flexibility and fluency in problem solving and problem generation<br />

• Builds on a student's acquired knowledge to transfer previous experience to accomplish complex<br />

cognitive tasks and develop higher <strong>or</strong>der thinking skills<br />

• Allows opp<strong>or</strong>tunity f<strong>or</strong> student's rapid comprehension of abstract concepts<br />

• Pursues independent learning<br />

Strong Service Level: Profile of a Strong Need f<strong>or</strong> Differentiation<br />

Cognitive Demands of a Strong Program Level<br />

• Consistently applies familiar abstract reasoning skills to problem solving<br />

• Earns Level 4 <strong>or</strong> A on rep<strong>or</strong>t cards and grade level classroom assignments<br />

• Earns Level 3*/4 <strong>or</strong> A/B on rep<strong>or</strong>t cards and above grade level classroom assignments<br />

• Demonstrates mastery of standard course of study 1-2 years beyond his/her age peers<br />

• Occasionally initiates independent activities<br />

• Allows f<strong>or</strong> fast pace of instruction<br />

• Includes difficult learning materials and tasks<br />

• Allows opp<strong>or</strong>tunity f<strong>or</strong> flexibility and fluency in problem solving and problem generation<br />

• Builds on transfer of previous experience to develop higher <strong>or</strong>der thinking skills<br />

• Guides students to use acquired knowledge and accomplish complex cognitive tasks


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 7 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Moderate Service Level: Profile of a Moderate Need f<strong>or</strong> Differentiation<br />

Cognitive Demands of a Moderate Program Level<br />

• Applies familiar abstract strategies, sometimes with supp<strong>or</strong>t<br />

• Earns Level 3* <strong>or</strong> 4 <strong>or</strong> A/B on rep<strong>or</strong>t cards and grade level classroom assignments<br />

• Allows f<strong>or</strong> fast paced instruction, as needed<br />

• Includes opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> extensions to the standard course of study<br />

• Develops higher <strong>or</strong>der thinking skills<br />

• General Education setting is appropriate f<strong>or</strong> maj<strong>or</strong>ity of instruction<br />

• Option f<strong>or</strong> attending selected AG units in strength area<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Meeting Minutes<br />

• Student AIG folders with identification documentation<br />

• <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System AIG Plan<br />

• Individual Student Profile<br />

• AIG Program Parent Guide<br />

• AIG Program Brochure<br />

Other Comments: Research and data collection f<strong>or</strong> one year to investigate the following:<br />

• increasing the percentile sc<strong>or</strong>es required f<strong>or</strong> identification in the F<strong>or</strong>mal Indicat<strong>or</strong>s (cognitive and<br />

achievement)<br />

• reducing <strong>or</strong> eliminating moderate identifications<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.<br />

Practice C<br />

Administers both non-traditional and traditional standardized measures that are based on current<br />

the<strong>or</strong>y and research.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Valid and reliable assessment instruments are used to identify students f<strong>or</strong> AIG Program<br />

services. Both group and individual measures are utilized.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description:<br />

TRADITIONAL MEASURES<br />

• Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)<br />

• Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS)


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 8 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

NON-TRADITIONAL MEASURES<br />

Individualized assessments administered by trained AIG Resource Teachers:<br />

• Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test (RIST)<br />

• Raven Standard Progressive Matrices<br />

• Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices<br />

• Woodcock Johnson III N<strong>or</strong>mative Update, Tests of Achievements (WJIII NU)<br />

Individualized assessments administered by the psychologist f<strong>or</strong> the AIG Program:<br />

• Wechsler Intelligence Scale f<strong>or</strong> Children, Fourth Edition: WISC-IV<br />

• Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability (WNV)<br />

• Stanf<strong>or</strong>d-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition: SB: IV<br />

• Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS)<br />

• Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT)<br />

• Woodcock Johnson III N<strong>or</strong>mative Update, Tests of Achievement (WJ III NU)<br />

• Kaufman Tests of Educational Achievement, Second Edition (KTEA-II)<br />

• Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–II (WIAT-II)<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: • Individual Student Profile (ISP) documenting assessments<br />

• List of administered assessments<br />

• Student AIG folder<br />

• Testing Calendars<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.<br />

Practice D<br />

Initiates screening, referral, and identification procedures that respond to traditionally underrepresented<br />

populations of the gifted and are responsive to LEA demographics. These populations<br />

include students who are culturally/ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, English language<br />

learners, highly gifted, and twice-exceptional.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: There is gap between the number of students identified as academically intellectually<br />

gifted from under-represented populations and the total school population.<br />

The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System is committed to identifying the academic needs of highfunctioning<br />

and high-potential students from all populations. The AIG Program seeks ways to identify


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 9 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

and implement programming and specific nurturing initiatives to improve the representation,<br />

participation, and perf<strong>or</strong>mance of under-represented populations.<br />

Goals: The AIG Program will increase the number of students from under-represented populations<br />

identified as AIG by 2% by 2013.<br />

Description: Strategies to increase the successful identification and participation of underrepresented<br />

student populations include:<br />

• The Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Model provides opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> students to demonstrate gifted<br />

behavi<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

• Nomination by any school personnel, parents, and community members to increase the screening<br />

pool.<br />

• Opp<strong>or</strong>tunities in the regular classroom that meet individual and cultural learning needs to<br />

demonstrate gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

• Use of <strong>Gifted</strong> Rating Scales f<strong>or</strong> additional evidence f<strong>or</strong> under-represented populations.<br />

• P<strong>or</strong>tfolios of w<strong>or</strong>k samples, projects, videos, higher <strong>or</strong>der thinking, and problem solving<br />

• Interventions to supp<strong>or</strong>t unique learning styles, multiple intelligences, and differentiated content and<br />

instruction.<br />

• Alternative n<strong>or</strong>m referenced assessments.<br />

• Use of Individual Differentiated Education Plans (IDEPs) to provide an alternate identification<br />

pathway.<br />

• Professional development provided f<strong>or</strong> AIG Resource and other teachers to supp<strong>or</strong>t the learning<br />

characteristics and gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s of students from under-represented populations<br />

• Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with school counsel<strong>or</strong>s in identifying academic offerings aligned with student interest<br />

and motivation.<br />

• AIG Program essential documents available in Spanish.<br />

• Encouragement of parent participation in annual course selection.<br />

• Continuous monit<strong>or</strong>ing and review of nominations and referrals f<strong>or</strong> AIG services.<br />

• Links between content and real-w<strong>or</strong>ld applications in c<strong>or</strong>e instruction.<br />

• AIG Program initiatives: Project Bright IDEA, Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons (Building Thinking Skills) and Project<br />

Bright Tom<strong>or</strong>row.<br />

• Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with Title I f<strong>or</strong> funds to expand Bright IDEA model in Title I schools<br />

The AIG Program uses individual assessment instruments (standardized tests) f<strong>or</strong> referral and<br />

identification of under-represented populations which may include non-verbal intelligence tests.<br />

Professional personnel are available to provide assessments in the language in which the student is<br />

most fluent. Individual aptitude and achievement assessments are administered to identify highpotential<br />

students from special populations. Circumstances under which individually administered<br />

tests are appropriate may include:<br />

• The student has a documented medical condition <strong>or</strong> disability that may interfere with his/her ability<br />

to perf<strong>or</strong>m optimally in a group situation (i.e. ADD, ADHD, chronic asthma, etc.)<br />

• The student has cultural differences, which may interfere with language usage (i.e. LEP, ESL, etc.).<br />

• The student is from a culturally, linguistically, and/<strong>or</strong> ethnically diverse background.<br />

• The existing group data (current within twelve months) on the student does not provide sufficient<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>mation to make the decision about the need f<strong>or</strong> services.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 10 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS f<strong>or</strong> Identification of Students from Under-represented Populations:<br />

- One sc<strong>or</strong>e at 90% <strong>or</strong> above in either aptitude OR achievement may be paired with the following<br />

additional indicat<strong>or</strong>s to qualify f<strong>or</strong> AIG identification:<br />

-<strong>Gifted</strong> Rating Scales<br />

-Perf<strong>or</strong>mance/p<strong>or</strong>tfolio w<strong>or</strong>k samples<br />

An Individual Differentiated Education Plan (IDEP) will be written f<strong>or</strong> any student from underrepresented<br />

populations identified through this alternative pathway<br />

The SBCGE is responsible f<strong>or</strong> verifying that:<br />

• Students with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) will be provided with appropriate accommodations<br />

and modifications as directed by the IEP, in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with Programs f<strong>or</strong> Exceptional Children<br />

• Students with a 504 Plan are tested as directed by the 504 Plan with appropriate accommodations<br />

and modifications in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans With<br />

Disabilities Act.<br />

An Individual Differentiated Education Plan-IDEP provides an alternate identification pathway using<br />

multiple criteria f<strong>or</strong> identification f<strong>or</strong> under-represented populations.<br />

The SBCGE and the IEP team meet to determine appropriate services f<strong>or</strong> the twice exceptional<br />

student. Twice exceptional students are identified as academically intellectually gifted and meet<br />

criteria f<strong>or</strong> exceptional children services such as autism, learning disabled, visually impaired and<br />

other health impaired (attention deficit hyperactivity dis<strong>or</strong>der, etc).<br />

The SBCGE, school personnel, AIG Program Staff and Central Office staff collab<strong>or</strong>ate to determine<br />

appropriate services f<strong>or</strong> highly gifted students.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Increased numbers of students identified from under-represented populations<br />

• Individual Student Profiles<br />

• Results from <strong>Gifted</strong> Rating Scales<br />

• Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Program<br />

• Bright IDEA/Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons/Bright Tom<strong>or</strong>row initiatives<br />

• Nonverbal and alternative assessment measures<br />

• IDEP identifications<br />

• Professional development agendas and rosters<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 11 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

towards appropriate educational services.<br />

Practice E<br />

Ensures consistency in implementation of screening, referral, and identification processes within the<br />

LEA.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: AIG Program screening, referral and identification should be equitable across the district.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: • Students are screened across all schools based on student perf<strong>or</strong>mance and<br />

characteristics of gifted learners.<br />

• All referrals are reviewed by the SBCGE to ensure consistency of the referral and identification<br />

process.<br />

• All SBCGE decisions are submitted f<strong>or</strong> administrative review and approval based on identification<br />

procedures.<br />

• The Services f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SAGE) software application<br />

developed f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public <strong>Schools</strong> AIG Program will provide a consistent structure f<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>or</strong>ganizing and rep<strong>or</strong>ting identification data. This tool allows direct data entry by AIG teachers, imp<strong>or</strong>t<br />

of CogAT and ITBS test data and other f<strong>or</strong>mal and inf<strong>or</strong>mal indicat<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

• Identification Procedures are documented and communicated in AIG Program Plan.<br />

• AIG Teacher training in test administration and interpretation is provided by AIG psychologist.<br />

• Central Service staff review all recommended identifications to ensure appropriate, equitable<br />

application of approved procedures and established criteria.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Individual Student Profiles<br />

• Parent presentations<br />

• SAGE website data<br />

• AIG website<br />

• SAGE Administrative Approvals<br />

• e<strong>Schools</strong> courses<br />

• SBCGE minutes and notes<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 12 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice F<br />

Establishes written policies that safeguard the rights of AIG students and their parents/families,<br />

including inf<strong>or</strong>med consent regarding identification and placement, reassessment procedures,<br />

transfers from other LEAs, and procedures f<strong>or</strong> resolving disagreements.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: In acc<strong>or</strong>dance with state law, the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System has developed a<br />

procedure f<strong>or</strong> resolving disagreements between parents and the school system when a child is not<br />

identified as an AIG student <strong>or</strong> concerning the appropriateness of services offered to the AIG student.<br />

These procedures relate to the processes of student nomination, referral, evaluation, identification,<br />

and the availability of approved service options.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Parents have an opp<strong>or</strong>tunity f<strong>or</strong> input about their child's specific needs and are inf<strong>or</strong>med<br />

of the recommendations made by the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE).There<br />

are several stages during the decision-making process in which parent permission is obtained and<br />

documentation is provided f<strong>or</strong> parent review. At each stage parents are inf<strong>or</strong>med about the<br />

recommendations f<strong>or</strong> the student's need f<strong>or</strong> differentiated educational services:<br />

*If the student was NOMINATED, but NOT REFERRED f<strong>or</strong> further evaluation, the following<br />

documents serve to inf<strong>or</strong>m the parent of this decision:<br />

1. Parent Guide to the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program<br />

2. Notice to Parents – Results of Nomination<br />

3. Individual Student Profile (ISP)<br />

*If the student was REFERRED, but NOT IDENTIFIED as needing differentiated services, then the<br />

following documents serve to inf<strong>or</strong>m the parent of this decision:<br />

1. Parent Guide to <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program (received at the nomination stage)<br />

2. Pri<strong>or</strong> Notice and Parent Consent f<strong>or</strong> Evaluation<br />

3. Individual Student Profile (ISP)<br />

4. Notice to Parents – Results of Nomination<br />

*If the student was IDENTIFIED f<strong>or</strong> differentiated services and a Differentiated Education Plan (DEP)<br />

<strong>or</strong> Individual Differentiated Education Plan (IDEP) was recommended, then the following documents<br />

serve to inf<strong>or</strong>m the parent of this decision:<br />

1. Parent Guide to <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program<br />

2. Pri<strong>or</strong> Notice and Parent Consent f<strong>or</strong> Evaluation<br />

3. Individual Student Profile (ISP)<br />

4. Differentiated Education Plan (DEP) and/<strong>or</strong> Individual Differentiated Education Plan (IDEP)<br />

5. Pri<strong>or</strong> Notice and Initial Consent f<strong>or</strong> Services


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 13 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Parents have the right to disagree with the recommendations made at any of these stages:<br />

NOMININATON, REFERRAL, and IDENTIFICATION. Parents also have the right to disagree with the<br />

differentiated services provided through the AIG Program f<strong>or</strong> identified students. The following steps<br />

to resolve problems at the school level should be followed:<br />

*If a parent has a dispute with the gifted services within the regular classroom OR within the AIG<br />

Resource Teacher's classroom, the following steps should be taken:<br />

1. The parent should meet with the classroom teacher and/<strong>or</strong> the AIG resource teacher to seek a<br />

resolution.<br />

2. If this meeting does not resolve the problem, the parent should document the issues and the<br />

parent's perspective of the situation should be outlined in a letter to the teacher, requesting a written<br />

response from the teacher within ten w<strong>or</strong>king days.<br />

3. If resolution is not reached, the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBC-GE) should<br />

schedule a meeting to review the problem and conference with school administration.<br />

4. After the parent receives the teacher's written response, the parent may then request to meet with<br />

the school administration.<br />

5. If a resolution is not reached at the school level, parents may contact the following Central Services<br />

personnel f<strong>or</strong> review of concerns in the following <strong>or</strong>der:<br />

• Direct<strong>or</strong> of <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program<br />

• Area Superintendent<br />

• Superintendent<br />

• Board of Education<br />

6. Upon exhausting these channels of communication, parents may elect to pursue the grievance<br />

process as outlined below in Procedures to Resolve Disagreements Regarding <strong>Academically</strong><br />

<strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Decisions.<br />

*Procedures to Resolve Disagreements Regarding AIG Decisions<br />

Parent have the right to disagree with the recommendations made at any of these stages. The<br />

following procedures f<strong>or</strong> resolution of such disagreements have been established in Article 3 of<br />

Chapter 150B of the NC General Statutes and by <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System Board Policy<br />

6520 on student grievances.<br />

1. The parent may make a written request f<strong>or</strong> a conference with the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE) to discuss concerns about the recommendation f<strong>or</strong> identification <strong>or</strong><br />

services.<br />

At a School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education meeting:<br />

a. Parents may provide additional documentation f<strong>or</strong> consideration by the SBCGE.<br />

b. The SBCGE will share documentation used to supp<strong>or</strong>t the committee decision and review<br />

additional documentation.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 14 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

2. If the disagreement is not resolved at the SBCGE conference, then the parent may make a written<br />

request within thirty days f<strong>or</strong> a conference with the principal. The principal will:<br />

a. Review the recommendation with the SBCGE chairperson.<br />

b. Grant the conference within five school days of the request.<br />

c. State their position in writing within five school days of the conference.<br />

3. If the grievance is not resolved through the conference with the principal, the parent may appeal in<br />

writing to the AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong>. The AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong> will:<br />

a. Review all documentation concerning the unresolved issue.<br />

b. Review the grievance within five days of the appeal.<br />

c. Respond in writing within ten days following the review.<br />

4. If the grievance is not resolved through the conference with the AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong>, then the<br />

parent may appeal in writing to the Area Superintendent. The Area Superintendent will:<br />

a. Review all documentation concerning the unresolved issue.<br />

b. Review the grievance within five days of the appeal.<br />

c. Inf<strong>or</strong>m the Chief Academic Officer of the grievance.<br />

d. Respond in writing within ten days following the review.<br />

5. If the grievance is not resolved through the conference with the Area Superintendent, the parent<br />

may appeal in writing to the Superintendent. The Superintendent will:<br />

a. Review all documentation concerning the unresolved issue.<br />

b. Review the grievance within five days of the appeal.<br />

c. Respond in writing within ten days following the review.<br />

6. If the grievance is not resolved through the review of the Superintendent, then the parent may<br />

appeal in writing to the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System Board of Education within ten school<br />

days following the written response from the Superintendent. The Board of Education will:<br />

a. Review all documentation concerning the unresolved issue within ten days.<br />

b. Offer a final written decision within thirty days after review.<br />

7. In the event that the local grievance procedure fails to resolve the disagreement the parent may file<br />

a petition f<strong>or</strong> a contested case hearing (Article 3 Chapter 150B of the General Statutes). The purpose<br />

of the review is to determine if:<br />

• The local school administrative unit improperly failed to identify the student as an<br />

academically/intellectually gifted student, <strong>or</strong><br />

• The local plan has been implemented inappropriately with regard to the student.<br />

Following the hearing the administrative law judge shall make a decision that contains findings of fact<br />

and conclusion of law. Notwithstanding the provision of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes, the<br />

decision of the administrative law judge becomes final, is binding on the parties, and is not subject to<br />

further review under Article 4 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 15 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

TRANSFER STUDENT PROCEDURES<br />

• Students who transfer from other districts <strong>or</strong> schools with no pri<strong>or</strong> gifted (AIG) identification must be<br />

enrolled and actively attending a <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School bef<strong>or</strong>e the student may be nominated.<br />

The nomination/ referral procedures will then be followed.<br />

• Students who transfer from other districts where they were identified as gifted (AIG) must meet<br />

<strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s AIG identification criteria.<br />

• Identification in another school system does not transfer as automatic AIG identification in <strong>Wake</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. The AIG Program in <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> identifies students in reading/language arts and/<strong>or</strong><br />

mathematics.<br />

• Transfer students who have been previously identified and served in gifted programs in other<br />

districts are only guaranteed a referral to the AIG Program in <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

• Students may be nominated once enrolled and actively attending a <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School.<br />

Temp<strong>or</strong>ary AIG placement occurs when:<br />

• All pri<strong>or</strong> identification data (test sc<strong>or</strong>es) from the previous district meets <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s AIG<br />

identification criteria. The student may be placed temp<strong>or</strong>arily in the AIG program while inf<strong>or</strong>mal<br />

indicat<strong>or</strong>s and perf<strong>or</strong>mance data are collected in <strong>or</strong>der to complete the identification process.<br />

OR<br />

• Pri<strong>or</strong> identification data does not meet <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s AIG identification criteria, and the<br />

recommendation is f<strong>or</strong> the student to be referred to determine AIG eligibility, BUT<br />

• after th<strong>or</strong>ough explanation with the parent that the student may <strong>or</strong> may not be identified, AND<br />

• the parent still chooses f<strong>or</strong> the student to receive services on a temp<strong>or</strong>ary basis, THEN<br />

• the student may be placed temp<strong>or</strong>arily as a MODERATE level of service pending the completion<br />

of the referral/ identification process.<br />

AIG students transferring to WCPSS from other school districts:<br />

• SBC-GE must review all rec<strong>or</strong>ds to determine if there is enough data available to meet <strong>Wake</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>'s identification criteria.<br />

• If current test data and student perf<strong>or</strong>mance data are available to make a decision<br />

regarding identification, a recommendation will be made.<br />

• Parent signs the Temp<strong>or</strong>ary Placement f<strong>or</strong>m, if needed<br />

• If there is not enough data to make a decision, the student will be referred and tested in the<br />

next Testing Window. Teachers will gather student w<strong>or</strong>k samples and other evidences of need f<strong>or</strong><br />

gifted services during this process. This will take a minimum of 4-6 weeks.<br />

• The SBCGE will make a recommendation in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with the identification criteria.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 16 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

REEVALUATION PROCEDURES<br />

• K-3 identified students will take the CogAT/ITBS along with all 3rd graders; if they qualify, that will<br />

count as their reevaluation. If they do NOT meet the identification standards, they will exit the AIG<br />

program. They do not need to continue with an IDEP.<br />

• Any elementary student with an IDEP will need to be reevaluated by the end of their 5th grade year<br />

to determine if they need continued differentiated services through the AIG program. The SBCGE will<br />

meet to review the reassessment data and student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio to determine eligibility.<br />

• Middle School reevaluation may occur if requested by SBCGE. This may occur when:<br />

1. Student perf<strong>or</strong>mance indicates no need f<strong>or</strong> service at the Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review.<br />

2. Student perf<strong>or</strong>mance indicates a need to gather data f<strong>or</strong> education planning in consideration f<strong>or</strong><br />

acceleration.<br />

EXITING PROCEDURES from AIG Program at SBCGE request:<br />

• Parent conference to review student perf<strong>or</strong>mance data and concerns<br />

• SBCGE recommendation f<strong>or</strong> service no longer needed; temp<strong>or</strong>ary inactive status <strong>or</strong> remain active<br />

during reevaluation process<br />

• Instructional Supp<strong>or</strong>t Plan implemented f<strong>or</strong> one full semester<br />

• Documentation of implemented strategies reviewed<br />

• Request f<strong>or</strong> updated evaluation data<br />

• SBCGE determines need f<strong>or</strong> differentiated services<br />

EXITING PROCEDURES from AIG Program at parent request:<br />

A parent may request student exit from the AIG Program without a reevaluation.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Parent Guide<br />

• AIG Program Brochure<br />

• AIG Plan<br />

• Consent f<strong>or</strong> Evaluation f<strong>or</strong>m<br />

• Consent f<strong>or</strong> Service f<strong>or</strong>m<br />

• Temp<strong>or</strong>ary Placement f<strong>or</strong>m<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 1: Student Identification<br />

The LEA's student identification procedures f<strong>or</strong> AIG are clear, equitable, and comprehensive and lead<br />

towards appropriate educational services.<br />

Practice G<br />

Maintains documentation that explains the identification process and service options f<strong>or</strong> individual<br />

AIG students, which is reviewed annually with parents/families.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 17 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Although the identification process and service options are documented and shared with<br />

parents each year, m<strong>or</strong>e th<strong>or</strong>ough clarification is needed acc<strong>or</strong>ding to feedback collected during our<br />

evaluation. Additionally, some identification procedures have been clarified and documents will need<br />

to be updated.<br />

Goals: Update with new guidelines and publish:<br />

Student Search and Identification flow chart<br />

AIG Parent Guide<br />

AIG Program Brochure<br />

Individual Student Profile (ISP) Explanation Document<br />

Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process<br />

AIG School Service Delivery Plan<br />

AIG Program Parent Presentations<br />

AIG Webpage<br />

DCP- Differentiated Course Plan f<strong>or</strong> students<br />

DEP- Differentiated Education Plan f<strong>or</strong> students<br />

Description: The following documents will be updated to reflect changes in identification procedures:<br />

• AIG program Student Search and Identification flow chart<br />

• AIG Parent Guide and AIG Parent Brochure<br />

• ISP Explanation Document<br />

• Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process<br />

• AIG Service Delivery Plan f<strong>or</strong> school<br />

• AIG Program Parent Presentation and Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Power Point<br />

• AIG Inf<strong>or</strong>mation Webpage<br />

• DCP<br />

• DEP<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

ALL Revised documents and webpages f<strong>or</strong> WCPSS AIG Program:<br />

• AIG Parent Guide and AIG Program Brochure<br />

• AIG Identification Flowchart<br />

• Individual Student Profile (ISP) Explanation<br />

• AIG Service Delivery Plan f<strong>or</strong> schools<br />

• Presentations: Expl<strong>or</strong>ers, Parent overview<br />

• AIG Inf<strong>or</strong>mation Web Page<br />

• DCP<br />

• DEP<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 18 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice A<br />

Adapts the NC Standard Course of Study (SCOS) acc<strong>or</strong>ding to identified abilities, readiness,<br />

interests, and learning profiles, K-12.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Each child has unique strengths and needs and appropriate instruction is designed based<br />

on a complete learner profile.<br />

Services f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> students, as determined by their learning<br />

characteristics and areas of giftedness, include differentiated curricula and instructional opp<strong>or</strong>tunities<br />

directed toward the unique needs of the gifted learner. These services build upon and extend the<br />

N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina Standard Course of Study and span grades K-12.<br />

Differentiated curricula and instructional practices outlined in this plan align with the National<br />

Association f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Children (NAGC) Pre-K through Grade 12 <strong>Gifted</strong> Program Standards, N<strong>or</strong>th<br />

Carolina AIG Program Standards adopted 2009 by the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina State Board of Education, and<br />

the goals of the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Instructional Services Division.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG Program supp<strong>or</strong>ts the development and implementation of differentiated<br />

curricula and instruction based on a synthesis of nationally research-based models and the<strong>or</strong>ies.<br />

Students receive differentiated curricula and instruction that is greater in depth and complexity.<br />

Service delivery options f<strong>or</strong> gifted learners create challenging opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> optimal student growth<br />

as described in Standard 2 Practice B.<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Resource Teachers and regular education teachers develop and<br />

implement high-quality, comprehensive curricula which include the components of: in-depth content,<br />

assessments, introduction, grouping strategies, teaching activities, learning activities, products,<br />

resources, extensions, and differentiation. Differentiated curricula and instruction align with<br />

Differentiated Education Plans (DEPs) <strong>or</strong> Individual Differentiated Education Plans (IDEPs) and<br />

Differentiated Course Plans (DCPs) f<strong>or</strong> students in identified areas of giftedness. The Annual<br />

Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process determines if the goals have been met.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Service Delivery Plan f<strong>or</strong> schools<br />

• Differentiated Course Plans and Differentiated Education Plans<br />

• Parent Presentation by the AIG Teacher<br />

• Student W<strong>or</strong>k Samples and p<strong>or</strong>tfolios<br />

• Curriculum Management Application (C-MAPP)<br />

• Teacher Toolbox f<strong>or</strong> Planning Rig<strong>or</strong>ous Instruction<br />

• AIG teacher Curriculum Bank


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 19 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice B<br />

Enriches, extends, and accelerates the curriculum to address a range of ability levels in language<br />

arts, math, and other content areas as appropriate.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Students are placed into an appropriate learning environment with the program option that<br />

matches the student's cognitive and affective needs and aligns with the individual School AIG Service<br />

Delivery Plan.<br />

An identified student may require curriculum modification techniques designed to adjust levels of<br />

required learning so that all students are challenged, to increase the number of in-depth learning<br />

experiences, and to introduce various types of enrichment into regular curricular experiences.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG Resource Teacher and regular education teachers collab<strong>or</strong>ate to provide<br />

differentiated curriculum and instruction f<strong>or</strong> AIG students in the regular education classroom. The AIG<br />

Resource teacher provides direct services to students in grades four and five who are identified with a<br />

strong <strong>or</strong> very strong service level. The AIG Resource Teacher will either pull-out students and/<strong>or</strong><br />

push-in the classroom to meet student needs. (Cooperative Teaching: Consultation/Collab<strong>or</strong>ation<br />

Model)<br />

K-3<br />

• Consultation among classroom teachers and AIG teacher<br />

• Early identified students have needed differentiated services as outlined in their Individual<br />

Differentiated Education Plan (IDEP)<br />

• Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Program f<strong>or</strong> all 3rd grade students<br />

4-5<br />

• Cooperative Teaching: Consultation/Collab<strong>or</strong>ation Model; may include team teaching,<br />

complementary teaching, demonstration teaching and supp<strong>or</strong>tive learning activities<br />

6-8<br />

• Cluster and flexible grouping in language arts and mathematics<br />

• Course offerings in mathematics<br />

• Cooperative Teaching: Collab<strong>or</strong>ation/Consultation Model; may include team teaching,<br />

complementary teaching, demonstration teaching and supp<strong>or</strong>tive learning activities


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 20 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

The Differentiated Education Plans (DEPs) f<strong>or</strong> elementary and middle school students are developed<br />

at the beginning of each academic year by the AIG Resource Teacher in collab<strong>or</strong>ation with the<br />

regular education teachers. The DEP is reviewed and amended as needed during the academic year.<br />

Differentiated Course Plans (DCPs) are written yearly highlighting AIG program goals, content, and<br />

evaluation f<strong>or</strong> each student. DCPs are amended as needed during the academic year. Both the DEP<br />

and the DCP are reviewed during the Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process. Parents can request a<br />

meeting to discuss any recommended change in service level that is made by the School Based<br />

Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education.<br />

9-12<br />

• Students self-select courses<br />

• Hon<strong>or</strong>s and AP courses<br />

• IB courses, if available<br />

The Differentiated Education Plan (DEP) f<strong>or</strong> high school students indicates areas of service f<strong>or</strong><br />

students in grades nine through twelve. A copy of the high school DEP is provided to parents of<br />

identified students at the end of the eighth grade academic year. Accelerated high school students<br />

are served through hon<strong>or</strong>s and advanced placement classes and the International Baccalaureate<br />

classes, if available. Differentiated Course Plans are developed to describe the course goals, content<br />

and evaluation.<br />

AIG Program Service Options Available f<strong>or</strong> Identified Students with Levels Who Require<br />

Additional AIG Differentiation<br />

Out-of-grade grouping f<strong>or</strong> part of the instructional day may be the best available option f<strong>or</strong> the few<br />

students requiring significantly accelerated instruction. Students who are served<br />

by the cross-grade grouping may participate f<strong>or</strong> all <strong>or</strong> part of the academic year, depending on<br />

individual student needs.<br />

Differentiated Learning<br />

Students are provided differentiated curriculum through enrichment of the NC Standard Course of<br />

Study.<br />

Recommended f<strong>or</strong>ms of Accelerative Practice:<br />

*Early Entrance to Kindergarten: Available f<strong>or</strong> students who meet NC criteria.<br />

*Whole Grade Advancement: The need f<strong>or</strong> whole grade advancement is determined on an individual<br />

basis. Students recommended f<strong>or</strong> whole grade advancement must be identified as academically<br />

gifted and demonstrate characteristics consistent with the VERY STRONG level of need f<strong>or</strong><br />

differentiation.<br />

The SBCGE will request and review evidence indicating possible need f<strong>or</strong> whole grade advancement<br />

from regular education teachers, the AIG teacher, the AIG psychologist, and a Central Service AIG<br />

program administrat<strong>or</strong>.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 21 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

*Curriculum Compacting: Students may move rapidly through the curriculum if mastery is<br />

demonstrated by testing out of skills. Teacher <strong>or</strong> district created assessments and a p<strong>or</strong>tfolio of w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

samples and products can serve as indicat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> mastery.<br />

*Grade Telescoping: Student coursew<strong>or</strong>k is re<strong>or</strong>ganized vertically so that middle <strong>or</strong> high school<br />

requirements can be completed in less time. Middle and high school teachers and Central Services<br />

content specialists w<strong>or</strong>k collab<strong>or</strong>atively to design appropriate vertical alignment and <strong>or</strong>ganization.<br />

*Subject Area Acceleration: Students may be accelerated above grade level f<strong>or</strong> specific content area<br />

and course needs, without whole grade acceleration. Students whose perf<strong>or</strong>mance and interests<br />

indicate need f<strong>or</strong> acceleration two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e years beyond grade level peers in specific content areas<br />

may be referred to the SBCGE. A p<strong>or</strong>tfolio of student w<strong>or</strong>k that demonstrates a depth of conceptual<br />

understanding of the NC Standard Course of Study f<strong>or</strong> the current and succeeding grade levels will<br />

be reviewed. Indicat<strong>or</strong>s of advanced perf<strong>or</strong>mance and achievement in math and literacy profiles,<br />

reading levels, projects and other exemplary w<strong>or</strong>k products are considered by the SBCGE in<br />

determining need f<strong>or</strong> acceleration.<br />

*Cross-grade grouping: Students from different grades who are perf<strong>or</strong>ming at the same level <strong>or</strong><br />

demonstrate the same level of readiness are grouped together regardless of age f<strong>or</strong> instruction.<br />

*Concurrent Enrollment f<strong>or</strong> Content Area Need: In rare cases, a student may require instruction at a<br />

different school (elementary to middle, middle to high, high school to university) in a specific content<br />

area such as math. A recommendation from the SBCGE and the student's assigned school principal<br />

will be f<strong>or</strong>warded to the Central Services AIG Program administrat<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

*Advanced Placement: Students complete courses with advanced content.<br />

*Ment<strong>or</strong>ship: Students may be assigned to a professional <strong>or</strong> expert in a specific area of interest to<br />

expand experience and knowledge outside of the classroom.<br />

*NC Virtual Public School: Students may enroll in eLearning taught by NC-certified teachers. Grade<br />

will transfer to their local school and become part of their academic rec<strong>or</strong>d.<br />

*High School Credit: Students complete course f<strong>or</strong> high school credit while in middle school.<br />

*Dual Enrollment: Students complete high school courses toward graduation while concurrently taking<br />

university courses.<br />

*Early High School graduation and admission to college: students complete required and additional<br />

available coursew<strong>or</strong>k on an accelerated schedule at the high school level, graduate early, and then<br />

apply to early admission to college.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 22 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Service Delivery Plan<br />

• DCP<br />

• DEP<br />

• WCPSS web site<br />

• AIG web site<br />

• Curriculum Units<br />

• Student p<strong>or</strong>tfolios<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice C<br />

Employs diverse and effective instructional practices to address a range of learning needs.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program<br />

provides a wide variety of services f<strong>or</strong> identified AIG students from kindergarten through twelfth<br />

grade. AIG students receive services through a variety of settings; the services are designed to<br />

modify, supplement, and build on the academic skills and knowledge attained at all grade levels.<br />

Equitable access is assured by the consistent, system wide, application of the identification process.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: A variety of differentiated instructional strategies and methods are utilized within<br />

program options to offer modifications that develop high levels of thinking and accommodate<br />

individual interests, achievement levels, and learning styles.<br />

Cluster Grouping f<strong>or</strong> Instruction<br />

Elementary and middle school principals, in consultation with the SBCGE, elementary teachers and<br />

middle school teams, assign AIG students to regular education classrooms in clusters f<strong>or</strong> the maj<strong>or</strong>ity<br />

of gifted education services. Students are assigned to clusters based on similar needs. Students are<br />

placed in cluster groups based on their need in language arts and/<strong>or</strong> mathematics. Differentiated<br />

curriculum and instruction is provided in the clusters to AIG students. The classroom teacher and the<br />

AIG teacher w<strong>or</strong>k together to align appropriate instruction f<strong>or</strong> the AIG students. Cluster grouping is an<br />

instructional strategy that is documented on individual AIG Service Delivery Plans and on<br />

Differentiated Education Plans (DEP) f<strong>or</strong> identified students.<br />

In middle school the AIG Resource Teachers meet regularly with teachers to collab<strong>or</strong>ate and to plan<br />

f<strong>or</strong> differentiated curricula that will meet the needs of identified students.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 23 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

In elementary school the AIG Resource Teachers provide direct and indirect services to students<br />

through the implementation of the Cooperative Teaching: Consultation/Collab<strong>or</strong>ation Model.<br />

Cluster grouping in both elementary and middle schools significantly increases the effectiveness of<br />

the AIG Resource Teacher. Elementary AIG Teachers provide consultative service to teachers and<br />

direct service to students with a strong <strong>or</strong> very strong service level. Middle School AIG Resource<br />

Teachers provide consultative services to regular education teachers. Flexible grouping within the<br />

clusters should remain fluid and occur as appropriate.<br />

Flexible Grouping f<strong>or</strong> Instruction<br />

Flexible grouping is an instructional strategy that is documented on each school's <strong>Academically</strong><br />

<strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Service Delivery Plan and on Differentiated Education Plans (DEPs) f<strong>or</strong> identified<br />

students. Grouping is used to facilitate appropriate instruction. Flexible groups allow f<strong>or</strong> modification<br />

of curricula and instruction acc<strong>or</strong>ding to common ability, readiness levels, learning styles, and/<strong>or</strong><br />

interest of students. Identified students will have opp<strong>or</strong>tunities to be grouped flexibly without being<br />

separated from the rest of their classmates. This may include flexible in-class <strong>or</strong> across-class<br />

groupings f<strong>or</strong> differentiated activities <strong>or</strong> units. Students may be pre-assessed to f<strong>or</strong>m groups based<br />

upon common and specific needs in specific curricular areas. Groups are f<strong>or</strong>med as needed to assist<br />

differentiated curricula and instruction. Teachers meet regularly with the AIG Teacher to plan f<strong>or</strong><br />

flexible grouping instruction.<br />

High School Hon<strong>or</strong>s and Advanced Placement Courses<br />

Advanced classes are open to all students. Prerequisite courses are required f<strong>or</strong> enrollment in some<br />

hon<strong>or</strong>s <strong>or</strong> advanced placement courses. The high school administration, teachers, guidance<br />

counsel<strong>or</strong>s, and parents/guardians provide guidance to students in choosing appropriately<br />

challenging courses. During the course selection process, all school personnel recognize students<br />

having the potential to succeed.<br />

Essential Elements of Differentiated Instruction<br />

• Differentiation of Content, Process, and Product<br />

• Nurturing Learning Environment<br />

• Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills<br />

• Focus on Rig<strong>or</strong><br />

Through the ongoing implementation of the Cooperative Teaching: Consultation and Collab<strong>or</strong>ation<br />

Model <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Resource Teachers facilitate differentiated learning through direct and/<strong>or</strong><br />

indirect services f<strong>or</strong> gifted and high ability learners. <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Resource Teachers w<strong>or</strong>k in<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ation with regular education teachers to develop and implement resources, procedures,<br />

processes and strategies that provide challenge and enhance the quality of curriculum f<strong>or</strong> gifted and<br />

high ability students. Teachers differentiate, replace, supplement and/<strong>or</strong> modify curricula to facilitate<br />

higher-level learning goals by building upon and extending the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina Standard Course of<br />

Study.<br />

Independent Study: Identified students in grades four through twelve may participate in an<br />

independent study within an academic area of need f<strong>or</strong> expl<strong>or</strong>ing and advancing a specific academic<br />

interest <strong>or</strong> proficiency that cannot be provided in the regular education setting. The AIG Resource


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 24 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Teacher in collab<strong>or</strong>ation with the classroom teacher directs this option.<br />

Differentiated Learning Centers: Students who have mastered the basic curriculum and require<br />

additional enrichment may w<strong>or</strong>k in a classroom learning center f<strong>or</strong> specific units of study.<br />

Learning Contracts with Management Plans: Students may participate in a specific learning<br />

contract within an academic area of need f<strong>or</strong> expl<strong>or</strong>ing and advancing a specific academic interest <strong>or</strong><br />

proficiency that cannot be provided in the regular education setting. The AIG Resource Teacher in<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ation with the classroom teacher assists with f<strong>or</strong>mulating the contract and determining how it<br />

will be managed. Learning contracts are agreements between the classroom teacher and AIG<br />

Resource Teacher and student. Learning contracts allow the student to w<strong>or</strong>k independently on<br />

materials related to an identified unit of study extending and enriching the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina Standard<br />

Course of Study. The regular education teacher generally determines contract assignments, although<br />

students should be able to make choices within <strong>or</strong> modifications to these assignments. To be<br />

effective, it is imp<strong>or</strong>tant that contract goals be realistic and that teachers meet regularly with the<br />

student to provide instruction and to monit<strong>or</strong> progress. Learning contracts have clear goals, essential<br />

questions, content, and evaluation.<br />

Individualized Learning Plan: Students may participate in an individualized learning plan. The<br />

regular classroom teacher and AIG Resource Teacher in conjunction with the School Based<br />

Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education collab<strong>or</strong>atively develop an individualized differentiated learning plan.<br />

The plan f<strong>or</strong> individualized instruction is tail<strong>or</strong>ed to the unique educational requirements of the<br />

student; the plan is rec<strong>or</strong>ded on the Individualized Differentiated Education Plan (IDEP).<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Service Delivery Plan f<strong>or</strong> each school<br />

• Teacher Toolbox f<strong>or</strong> Planning Rig<strong>or</strong>ous Instruction<br />

• Curriculum Management Application (C-MAPP)<br />

• Instructional Resources<br />

• AIG Plan<br />

• Curriculum Units, lessons and activities<br />

• Student w<strong>or</strong>k samples<br />

• DCP<br />

• DEP<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 25 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice D<br />

Selects and uses a variety of research-based supplemental resources that augment curriculum and<br />

instruction.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: <strong>Gifted</strong> students require differentiated curriculum and instruction based on the<br />

characteristics of gifted learners.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: There are a variety of differentiated curricular, instructional, and resource materials<br />

available to <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Resource Teachers and regular education teachers that<br />

inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ate research-based models and methods.<br />

• WCPSS Curriculum Management Application (C-MAPP)<br />

• AIG Wiki site f<strong>or</strong> differentiated instruction and curricula<br />

• Kids Into Thinking (KIT) differentiation training modules and resources - Grades K-3<br />

• Enrichment activities aligned with the instructional calendars that enhance and extend the N<strong>or</strong>th<br />

Carolina Standard Course of Study- Grades 4-8<br />

• Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Model Lessons - Grade 3<br />

• Writing resources focused on developing Level 4 writers - Grades 4 and 7<br />

• Sharpen Your Thinking! mathematics supp<strong>or</strong>tive learning activities - Grades 3-8<br />

• Differentiated curricula examples at individual elementary, middle and high schools as an integral<br />

part of the on-site differentiation training<br />

• Student Engagement Strategies Resource<br />

• Teacher Toolbox f<strong>or</strong> Planning Rig<strong>or</strong>ous Instruction<br />

• Differentiation: Building Teacher Skills: Differentiation training modules and resources - Grades K-12<br />

• Instructional Differentiation From Preparation to Implementation: Differentiation training modules<br />

and resources - Grades K-12<br />

• Cooking Up Excellence: Three levels of differentiation training modules and resources - Grades K-5.<br />

• Cruise to Excellence: Three levels of differentiation training modules and resources - Grades 6-8.<br />

• Communities of Excellence: Differentiation training modules and resources - Grades 9-12.<br />

• Light Bites, Day Trips, and A Walk in the Park: A collection of sh<strong>or</strong>t staff development modules<br />

focusing on individual differentiation strategies – Grades K-12<br />

• Variety of Resource books aligned with AIG Program initiatives, ISD initiatives, and current research<br />

in gifted education<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Curriculum Bank<br />

• Differentiation Resources<br />

• Professional Development Resources<br />

• P<strong>or</strong>tfolios of student w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 26 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice E<br />

Fosters the development of 21st century content and skills by infusing the following at an advanced<br />

level: high-level content f<strong>or</strong> global awareness, civic and economic literacies, and health awareness;<br />

critical thinking and problem solving; high-level communication and collab<strong>or</strong>ation; applied inf<strong>or</strong>mation<br />

and media literacy, including concepts, systems, and operations in challenging research contexts;<br />

creativity and innovation; real-w<strong>or</strong>ld learning in local, regional, and global contexts; and applied life<br />

skills f<strong>or</strong> leadership, ethics, accountability, adaptability, productivity, responsibility, people skills, selfdirection,<br />

and social responsibility.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: AIG Resource Teachers w<strong>or</strong>k with Professional Learning Teams and collab<strong>or</strong>ate with<br />

content specialists in their schools to supp<strong>or</strong>t the integration of 21st century skills. AIG Resource<br />

Teachers are engaged in the ongoing research, development and piloting of conceptual based units<br />

of study that integrate challenging content and global thinking. These eff<strong>or</strong>ts will culminate in<br />

additions of integrated units of study in the C-MAPP.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice F<br />

Uses on-going assessment to differentiate classroom curriculum and instruction.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 27 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: Data regarding student readiness and interests, classroom perf<strong>or</strong>mance and<br />

achievement, learning preferences are analyzed f<strong>or</strong> planning appropriate differentiated instruction by<br />

AIG Resource Teachers. However, walkthrough observations and analysis of student w<strong>or</strong>k samples<br />

from regular education classrooms indicate a need f<strong>or</strong> additional supp<strong>or</strong>t and professional<br />

development f<strong>or</strong> classroom teachers in the use of assessment f<strong>or</strong> planning differentiated instruction.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: AIG Resource Teachers w<strong>or</strong>k with Professional Learning Teams in schools to supp<strong>or</strong>t<br />

the analysis of ongoing student assessment data. Blue Diamond assessments are used regularly in<br />

addition to other classroom assessments, tests, projects and student grades and perf<strong>or</strong>mance.<br />

F<strong>or</strong>mative assessments are used f<strong>or</strong> planning differentiated learning opp<strong>or</strong>tunities that reinf<strong>or</strong>ce,<br />

challenge and develop students' thinking. Assessment should be meaningful and have application in<br />

other areas of learning and life. Assessment should reflect what students know about content<br />

outcomes and standards. The results should be used to improve student perf<strong>or</strong>mance and<br />

knowledge.<br />

EVAAS attempts to estimate the effectiveness of schools, teachers, and even districts in raising<br />

student test sc<strong>or</strong>es by analyzing longitudinal databases that contain multiple measures of student<br />

perf<strong>or</strong>mance across years. This online database has recently been made available to all NC schools<br />

free of charge through the NC Department of Public Instruction. EVAAS produces estimates of the<br />

extent to which students sc<strong>or</strong>e better (<strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e po<strong>or</strong>ly) than would otherwise be expected on<br />

achievement test outcomes. This specific analysis is labeled a “School Value Added Rep<strong>or</strong>t”.<br />

Teachers continuously use f<strong>or</strong>mative and summative assessments and district-adopted tools to<br />

evaluate the effectiveness of implemented curricula and its impact on student achievement and<br />

growth. Professional learning teams of AIG Resource Teachers meet during scheduled planning<br />

times f<strong>or</strong> job-embedded learning and the development and implementation of differentiated curricula<br />

and instructional strategies. Sh<strong>or</strong>t-term and annual goals are established to monit<strong>or</strong> student<br />

achievement and growth. AIG Teachers create action plans through team-based action research to<br />

achieve goals and to clarify the evidence they will gather to assess the impact of their plans. This<br />

guides the w<strong>or</strong>k of teams as part of the process of continuous improvement of differentiated curricula<br />

and instructional practices.<br />

Effective assessment requires students to use higher levels of thinking to develop their own<br />

responses to questions, topics and issues. Assessment is tail<strong>or</strong>ed to the needs, strengths and<br />

weaknesses of the learner. Learning logs, anecdotal rec<strong>or</strong>ds, p<strong>or</strong>tfolios, perf<strong>or</strong>mance-based tasks,<br />

essays, journal entries, open-ended questions, discussions, peer response sessions and interviews<br />

are some f<strong>or</strong>ms of assessment that allow f<strong>or</strong> an open student response.<br />

Effective assessments require students to solve problems and think critically. They indicate to what<br />

extent students are able to use ideas, the<strong>or</strong>ies, methods, concepts <strong>or</strong> principles in situations<br />

encountered in daily life. W<strong>or</strong>thwhile products and perf<strong>or</strong>mances generally apply in real life settings<br />

and connect to the w<strong>or</strong>ld outside of the classroom. These types of assessments let us know how well<br />

students can use what they have learned, not just how well they can mem<strong>or</strong>ize and put something on<br />

paper.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 28 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Valid assessments base sc<strong>or</strong>ing on a set of specific standard criteria. Assessments should be<br />

consistent in expectations, criteria and sc<strong>or</strong>ing. Effective assessments are based on competencies,<br />

criteria, and a set of predetermined outcomes.<br />

Ongoing evaluation of implemented differentiated curricula and instruction occurs through<br />

the following process:<br />

1. Analyze student data.<br />

2. Align with instructional strategy.<br />

3. Identify and/<strong>or</strong> develop and implement supp<strong>or</strong>tive learning activities.<br />

4. Evaluate the effectiveness of strategies and/<strong>or</strong> activities.<br />

5. Analyze the results of f<strong>or</strong>mative and summative assessments.<br />

6. Repeat the cycle with further inquiry.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• PLT discussions<br />

• Math and Literacy Profiles<br />

• Blue Diamond results<br />

• Writing Assessments<br />

• Math predict<strong>or</strong>-EVAAS<br />

• WCPSS C-MAPP<br />

• EOG high growth data f<strong>or</strong> AIG students<br />

• F<strong>or</strong>mative and summative assessments, classroom & AIG teacher created<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice G<br />

Creates affective curricular and instructional practices which supp<strong>or</strong>t the social and emotional needs<br />

of AIG students.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program acknowledges that gifted students may have distinctive social and<br />

emotional needs. The AIG Program staff has w<strong>or</strong>ked with Dr. James DeLisle, an expert in this field,<br />

during the last 4 years. However, there is a need f<strong>or</strong> further w<strong>or</strong>k and collab<strong>or</strong>ative, focused planning<br />

to supp<strong>or</strong>t parents and teachers in recognizing and meeting these needs.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 29 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice H<br />

Cultivates and develops the potential of young (K-3) students through purposeful and intentional<br />

strategies and differentiated curriculum and instruction.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The development of gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s at a young age is critical f<strong>or</strong> achievement and<br />

development of full potential. The AIG Program provides opp<strong>or</strong>tunities and resources that nurture the<br />

gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s of young students at the K-3 level.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Summary of AIG Program Nurturing Initiatives<br />

K-2 Model:<br />

• Consultation and collab<strong>or</strong>ation with regular education teachers<br />

• Differentiated curriculum and instruction resources provided to regular education teachers<br />

• Professional development modules<br />

Nurturing Initiatives in Select <strong>Schools</strong> (Referenced in Standard 4, Practice I):<br />

• Project Bright IDEA<br />

• Project Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons<br />

• Project Bright Tom<strong>or</strong>row (Beginning 2011)<br />

Third Grade: Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Model<br />

The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System AIG Program includes a unique nurturing component f<strong>or</strong> all<br />

third grade students. Throughout the academic year, the AIG resource teacher w<strong>or</strong>ks in partnership<br />

with all third grade teachers to provide a variety of in-class experiences in language arts and


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 30 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

mathematics designed to elicit high academic perf<strong>or</strong>mance. All third grade students participate in<br />

whole class experiences. As the year progresses, students who demonstrate potential in these inclass<br />

experiences receive advanced and enriched learning opp<strong>or</strong>tunities. Student groups remain<br />

flexible and fluid throughout the school year.<br />

Student data collected during the implementation of Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Program are an integral part of the<br />

identification process f<strong>or</strong> third grade students. Selected w<strong>or</strong>k samples are designated f<strong>or</strong> inclusion in<br />

the third grade student p<strong>or</strong>tfolio.<br />

There are a variety of differentiated curricular, instructional, and resource materials available to AIG<br />

Resource Teachers and regular education teachers that inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ate research-based models and<br />

methods.<br />

• Kids Into Thinking (KIT) differentiation training modules and resources - Grades K-3.<br />

• Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Model Lessons - Grade 3<br />

• Cooking Up Excellence: Three levels of differentiation training modules and resources-Grades K-5<br />

• Differentiation: Building Teacher Skills<br />

• Instructional Differentiation from Preparation to Implementation<br />

• Teacher Toolbox f<strong>or</strong> Planning Rig<strong>or</strong>ous Instruction<br />

• Student Engagement Strategies Resource<br />

• Light Bites, Day Trips, and A Walk in the Park: A collection of sh<strong>or</strong>t staff development modules<br />

focusing on individual differentiation strategies – Grades K-12.<br />

• Variety of Resource books aligned with AIG Program initiatives, ISD initiatives, and current research<br />

in gifted education.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Curriculum Bank<br />

• Differentiation Resources<br />

• Student P<strong>or</strong>tfolios<br />

• Professional Development Resources<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice I<br />

Ensures collab<strong>or</strong>ation among AIG personnel and other professional staff, including exceptional<br />

children's personnel and others related to AIG students, to develop and implement differentiated<br />

curriculum and instruction.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 31 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: The knowledge and expertise of professional staff is critical to the development of<br />

comprehensive differentiated curricula that is aligned appropriately with the NC Standard Course of<br />

Study and provides necessary rig<strong>or</strong> and challenge.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The WCPSS Instructional Services Division maintains C-MAPP that outlines the NC<br />

Standard Course of Study f<strong>or</strong> teachers. This guide inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ates pacing guides and instructional<br />

calendars, benchmark Blue Diamond assessments, unit plans with cognitive emphasis, differentiation<br />

and enrichment options, and technology connections. Content area specialists collab<strong>or</strong>ate with AIG<br />

staff and AIG teachers to develop Differentiated Course Plans, lessons, and units of study found in C-<br />

MAPP. Content area specialists ensure that content is accurate and instructional practices are highly<br />

effective.<br />

AIG Program staff supp<strong>or</strong>t ongoing Intervention Alignment eff<strong>or</strong>ts to supp<strong>or</strong>t the success of all<br />

students. Students who are dually identified may be academically intellectually gifted and have<br />

intellectual, behavi<strong>or</strong>al, <strong>or</strong> physical needs that may interfere with educational perf<strong>or</strong>mance.<br />

Each School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education w<strong>or</strong>ks closely with the Student Supp<strong>or</strong>t Team to<br />

prescribe appropriate strategies and targeted interventions to address individual needs and foster<br />

increased success.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Professional Learning Team eff<strong>or</strong>ts and notes<br />

• Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with Dropout Prevention Committee<br />

• School Based Committee/Student Supp<strong>or</strong>t Services meeting notes<br />

• Individual Education Plans (IEPs)<br />

• Individual Differentiated Education Plans (IDEPs)<br />

• Differentiated Education Plan (DEPs)<br />

• WCPSS C-MAPP<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 2: Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction<br />

The LEA employs challenging, rig<strong>or</strong>ous, and relevant curriculum and instruction K-12 to<br />

accommodate a range of academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice J<br />

Develops and documents a plan that articulates the differentiated curriculum and instruction services<br />

that match the identified needs of the K-12 AIG students. The document is reviewed annually to<br />

ensure effective programming, a continuum of services, and school transitions.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Plan provides structure f<strong>or</strong> the annual review of student perf<strong>or</strong>mance and


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 32 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

achievement to ensure appropriate service to meet student needs.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Annual Reviews of each AIG identified student are conducted by the School Based<br />

Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education to determine possible needs f<strong>or</strong> change in service levels. Service<br />

levels may be increased, reduced, <strong>or</strong> remain the same based on collected evidence. Any students<br />

experiencing academic difficulty in K-12 may be provided with an Instructional Supp<strong>or</strong>t Plan in an<br />

eff<strong>or</strong>t to encourage, assist, and promote their success in the academic setting.<br />

The Differentiated Education Plans (DEP) f<strong>or</strong> elementary and middle school students are developed<br />

at the beginning of each academic year by regular education teachers and the AIG Resource<br />

Teacher. The DEP is reviewed and amended as needed during the academic year. Differentiated<br />

Course Plans(DCPs) are written yearly highlighting AIG program goals, content, and evaluation f<strong>or</strong><br />

each student. DCPs are amended as needed during the academic year. Both the DEP and the DCP<br />

are reviewed during the Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process. Parents can request a meeting to<br />

discuss any recommended change in service level that is made by the School Based Committee.<br />

The High School Differentiated Education Plan (HS-DEP) indicates areas of service f<strong>or</strong> students in<br />

grades nine through twelve. A copy of the high school DEP is provided to parents of identified<br />

students at the end of the eighth grade academic year. Accelerated high school students are served<br />

through hon<strong>or</strong>s and advanced placement classes and International Baccalaureate classes, if<br />

available. Differentiated Course Plans are highly developed and describe the course goals, content,<br />

and evaluation.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Differentiated Education Plans (DEPs)<br />

• Differentiated Course Plans (DCPs)<br />

• Annual Review Documentation<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice A<br />

Employs an AIG-licensed educat<strong>or</strong>(s) to guide, plan, develop, implement, revise, and monit<strong>or</strong> the<br />

local AIG program.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 33 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: AIG Co<strong>or</strong>dinating Teachers are AIG certified and it is recommended that the Direct<strong>or</strong> also<br />

be AIG certified.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG certified co<strong>or</strong>dinating teachers and resource teachers w<strong>or</strong>k with the direct<strong>or</strong> to<br />

develop and monit<strong>or</strong> the AIG Plan with ongoing feedback from the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership<br />

Team, administrat<strong>or</strong>s, teachers and parents.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

AIG Direct<strong>or</strong> and Co<strong>or</strong>dinating Teacher job descriptions<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice B<br />

Ensures that AIG specialists are engaged in tasks which explicitly address the academic, intellectual,<br />

social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: AIG Teachers attend professional development each year that addresses their roles and<br />

responsibilities f<strong>or</strong> differentiated curriculum and instruction to meet the needs of gifted learners.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description:<br />

AIG Resource teachers have opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> professional development of differentiated curriculum<br />

and instruction. Quarterly rep<strong>or</strong>ts of roles and responsibilities reflect their activities and tasks related<br />

to the needs of gifted learners.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Quarter by Quarter Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• Daily Schedule<br />

• Professional development<br />

• AIG Teacher meeting attendance rosters<br />

Other Comments:


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 34 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice C<br />

Establishes specific and appropriate professional development requirements f<strong>or</strong> all personnel<br />

involved in AIG programs and services, including classroom teachers, exceptional children's<br />

personnel, counsel<strong>or</strong>s, and school administrat<strong>or</strong>s.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Requirements f<strong>or</strong> professional development should be established so that all teachers<br />

and other personnel who w<strong>or</strong>k with AIG students can recognize and address the needs of gifted<br />

students.<br />

Strategic and focused professional development is needed to maximize student achievement and<br />

growth of AIG students.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice D<br />

Places AIG students in classrooms with teachers who have met the LEA's professional development<br />

requirements f<strong>or</strong> that position <strong>or</strong> have earned an AIG add-on license.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: All teachers who serve AIG identified students need professional development to prepare


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 35 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

them to provide appropriate differentiated instruction on a daily basis.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice E<br />

Aligns professional development with local AIG program goals and other district initiatives.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program professional development is aligned with the WCPSS strategic<br />

directives and initiatives to supp<strong>or</strong>t and promote optimal student learning and teacher and principal<br />

efectiveness.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Professional development is a collab<strong>or</strong>ative eff<strong>or</strong>t of the Instructional Services Division<br />

and Curriculum and Instruction, the Office of Professional Development, and the AIG Program. The<br />

professional development plan aligns with the National Association f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Children (NAGC)<br />

Standards, PreK-Grade 12 <strong>Gifted</strong> Program Standards, N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina AIG Program Standards<br />

established by the Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division, and the<br />

recommendations from the Curriculum Management Audit.<br />

AIG Resource Teachers<br />

The AIG Program Central Services personnel and other educat<strong>or</strong>s develop and implement academic<br />

programs and rig<strong>or</strong>ous, relevant curricula that equip students with the knowledge, skills, and<br />

dispositions needed f<strong>or</strong> success in meeting 21st century challenges. The AIG Program designs and<br />

implements ongoing professional development f<strong>or</strong> AIG teachers to increase expertise by providing:<br />

• appropriate differentiated curricula and instruction f<strong>or</strong> gifted and highly able learners<br />

• consultation services to all classroom (general education) teachers;<br />

• professional development to school personnel


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 36 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Regular Education Teachers<br />

The AIG Program provides regular education teachers learning opp<strong>or</strong>tunities specific to the potential,<br />

characteristics, and needs of gifted learners from kindergarten through eighth grade. The AIG<br />

Program also provides opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> ongoing differentiation training through the Consultation and<br />

Collab<strong>or</strong>ation model to teachers of kindergarten through eighth grade students. The AIG Program<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ates with the high school team to supp<strong>or</strong>t high school regular education teachers with<br />

differentiation.<br />

This professional development in differentiation strategies is a three-year progression of training with<br />

different levels of entry points and application f<strong>or</strong> school staffs. It is aligned with the No Child Left<br />

Behind (NCLB) High Quality Professional Development, the National Standards f<strong>or</strong> Quality<br />

Professional Development, and Southeastern Regional Vision f<strong>or</strong> Education (SERVE) research. AIG<br />

Resource Teachers supp<strong>or</strong>t regular education teachers as they review, reflect upon, and refine their<br />

use of differentiation in managing curricula, instruction, and assessment to promote optimal student<br />

growth and achievement.<br />

Staff development modules (such as, Light Bites, Day Trips, and A Walk in the Park) can be offered<br />

independently at a staff meeting <strong>or</strong> grouped f<strong>or</strong> a longer professional development session. Each<br />

module focuses on a single differentiation concept <strong>or</strong> strategy and can be presented in 10-15<br />

minutes. A special section includes sessions on reading comprehension and student engagement.<br />

Optional activities and samples enable each module to be expanded to a longer session. The close<br />

interrelation of the topics facilitates grouping of several modules into one unit.<br />

Elementary and middle school AIG Resource Teachers focus on teaching and learning in their<br />

schools. They facilitate multiple f<strong>or</strong>ms of job-embedded, learner-centered professional development.<br />

They share knowledge and best practices, develop rig<strong>or</strong>ous and relevant c<strong>or</strong>e<br />

curriculum, and contribute to the development of collab<strong>or</strong>ative learning cultures to supp<strong>or</strong>t student<br />

success through positive nurturing relationships. AIG Resource Teachers also meet with groups of<br />

parents/guardians in <strong>or</strong>der to educate, inf<strong>or</strong>m, and prepare them to assist with Kids Into Thinking<br />

(KIT) as part of the AG Program initiatives.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Professional development training modules<br />

• Professional development schedules<br />

• Agendas aligned with AIG program goals<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 37 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice F<br />

Aligns professional development opp<strong>or</strong>tunities with state and/<strong>or</strong> national teaching standards,<br />

including 21st century skills and content at advanced levels.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: AIG professional development is aligned with state and national standards with a focus on<br />

21st century skills.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Professional development focuses on helping teachers understand advanced learner<br />

needs and strategies f<strong>or</strong> differentiation of content, processes and products in daily instruction.<br />

The pri<strong>or</strong>ity of the NC State Board of Education is that every public school student will graduate from<br />

high school, globally competitive f<strong>or</strong> w<strong>or</strong>k and postsecondary education and prepared f<strong>or</strong> life in the<br />

21st Century. AIG Program goals supp<strong>or</strong>t this vision of preparing future ready and globally<br />

competitive students. AIG Program resources, units of study, assessment and professional<br />

development opp<strong>or</strong>tunities align with this vision and are evidenced in C-MAPP.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Professional development agendas<br />

• State and national standards<br />

• C-MAPP<br />

• AIG Professional Development training modules<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 3: Personnel and Professional Development<br />

The LEA recruits and retains highly qualified professionals and provides relevant and effective<br />

professional development concerning the needs of gifted learners that is on-going and<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Practice G<br />

Provides opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> AIG specialists and other teachers to plan, implement, and refine<br />

applications of their professional development learning.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Professional development that is ongoing and job-embedded is available and offered<br />

several times each year. It encourages collab<strong>or</strong>ative planning and teaching among elementary and<br />

middle school AIG Resource Teachers and regular education teachers.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 38 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: In a consultation and collab<strong>or</strong>ative cooperative teaching model, the AIG Resource<br />

teacher w<strong>or</strong>ks with classroom teachers to plan and deliver appropriately differentiated curricula and<br />

instruction that include the in-depth study of complex and sophisticated content thus encouraging<br />

students to develop products that reflect their abilities and apply complex thinking and questioning.<br />

Teachers apply strategies and refine units of study to the benefit of the learner.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Professional development agendas and rosters<br />

• Collab<strong>or</strong>ative teaching data<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice A<br />

Delivers AIG programs and services which are comprehensive of the academic, intellectual, social,<br />

and emotional needs of gifted learners across all grade levels and settings.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Services f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> students with very strong need f<strong>or</strong> differentiated instruction need<br />

expansion. Highly and profoundly gifted students require time and appropriate structures f<strong>or</strong> w<strong>or</strong>king<br />

with their intellectual peers. Stakeholder feedback suggests a need f<strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e direct service at the<br />

middle school level.<br />

Goals: Develop/design appropriate instructional supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> highly gifted students, such as:<br />

• Focused planning f<strong>or</strong> differentiated instruction, problem based learning, long- and sh<strong>or</strong>t-term<br />

projects, independent study, learning contracts, and m<strong>or</strong>e direct contact and supp<strong>or</strong>t from middle<br />

school AIG teachers.<br />

• Classes taught by highly qualified, AIG certified math and language arts teachers, in collab<strong>or</strong>ation<br />

with the school's AIG Resource teacher<br />

•Students with a very strong level of need f<strong>or</strong> differentiation, acceleration, and enrichment receive<br />

direct consultation and supp<strong>or</strong>t from the AIG Resource teacher.<br />

Description: The AIG Program School Delivery Plan offers a comprehensive list of appropriate<br />

grouping strategies, content differentiation and accelerative options f<strong>or</strong> schools to meet the needs of<br />

gifted learners. Highly gifted students have diverse academic needs and their services need to be<br />

expanded in elementary and middle school.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 39 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Differentiated Education Plans<br />

• Differentiated Course Plans<br />

• Individual Differentiated Education Plans<br />

• Professional Learning Team Meeting Minutes<br />

• Professional Development products<br />

• Acceleration and Enrichment opp<strong>or</strong>tunities noted on DEPs and Progress Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• AIG Program School Delivery Plan<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice B<br />

Aligns AIG programs and services with each area of AIG identification, goals of the program, and<br />

resources of the LEA.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program alignment is a collab<strong>or</strong>ative eff<strong>or</strong>t of the Instructional Services Division<br />

staff in reading and mathematics.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Development of AIG resources, lessons and units of study are aligned with critical<br />

areas in reading and mathematics. Recommendations of the Curriculum Management Audit related<br />

to the need f<strong>or</strong> increasing the cognitive challenge of learning tasks and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities as measured by<br />

Bloom's Taxonomy are implemented in professional development provided f<strong>or</strong> AIG and regular<br />

education teachers.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Lessons and units of study<br />

• AIG Curriculum Bank<br />

• Professional Development Agendas<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 40 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice C<br />

Delivers AIG programs and services that are integral and connected to the total instructional program<br />

of the LEA in policy and practice.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program aligns services with the goals of the NC Standard Course of Study and<br />

responds to the recommendations of the Curriculum Management Audit.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG Program staff collab<strong>or</strong>ates with the Instructional Services Division in the<br />

development of C-MAPP to provide integrated enrichment and extension lessons and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities.<br />

The AIG Program supp<strong>or</strong>ts the appropriate use of accelerative and grouping practices and<br />

differentiated curriculum and instruction.<br />

Extra-curricular activities such as Duke TIP, PAGE Super Saturday, Odyssey of the Mind, and Math<br />

Olympiad are supp<strong>or</strong>ted by the AIG Program to foster the needs of gifted learners.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

•WCPSS C-MAPP<br />

•School Service Delivery Plans<br />

•Differentiated Education Plans<br />

•Differentiated Course Plans<br />

•WCPSS AIG Website<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice D<br />

Inf<strong>or</strong>ms all teachers, school administrat<strong>or</strong>s, and supp<strong>or</strong>t staff about delivery of differentiated services<br />

and instruction f<strong>or</strong> AIG students, regulations related to gifted education, and the local AIG program<br />

and plan.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 41 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: Communication with school and district personnel occurs through several venues. AIG<br />

program inf<strong>or</strong>mation is available in schools and on the WCPSS website.<br />

Goals: Update the WCPSS AIG website and develop identification documents. Revise the school<br />

staff AIG presentation. AIG direct<strong>or</strong> will present the updated AIG Plan to school administrat<strong>or</strong>s and<br />

AIG teachers.<br />

Description: The AIG Program staff participates in principals' meetings, Area Superintendents'<br />

meetings, and IRT meetings to provide inf<strong>or</strong>mation about goals and service delivery expectations<br />

outlined in the district's AIG Program Plan. AIG resource teachers at each school provide sessions<br />

each year to inf<strong>or</strong>m school administrat<strong>or</strong>s and staff about the AIG program, share strategies f<strong>or</strong><br />

differentiating instruction, and lead related staff development. AIG teachers post inf<strong>or</strong>mation on their<br />

individual school websites and school newsletters.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Teachers' Quarterly Responsibilities Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• Individual School Websites<br />

• AIG School Newsletters<br />

• School Staff AIG Presentation<br />

• Meeting Agendas<br />

• Surveys to stakeholders<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice E<br />

Communicates among and between teachers and schools to ensure an effective continuation of K-12<br />

services, especially at key transition points.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program provides easily accessible inf<strong>or</strong>mation to describe and maintain<br />

effective services across grades K-12.<br />

Goals: Quarterly updates will be provided to AIG teachers to post electronically. Update K-12 service<br />

descriptions in AIG Parent Guide, AIG Program Brochure, school staff presentations and on the<br />

WCPSS website.<br />

Description: The AIG Program inf<strong>or</strong>ms teachers and schools in the following ways:


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 42 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Parent letters that explain the difference in service delivery in elementary school and middle school<br />

are sent home at the end of 5th grade.<br />

AIG teachers facilitate inf<strong>or</strong>mational sessions and presentations f<strong>or</strong> parents.<br />

A high school transition letter is sent home to rising ninth graders describing the course selection<br />

process, Advanced Placement and Hon<strong>or</strong>s Courses.<br />

School Based Committees f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> education review options f<strong>or</strong> accelerative practices such as dual<br />

enrollment that may be approved f<strong>or</strong> students who demonstrate advanced perf<strong>or</strong>mance two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

grade levels above their age peers <strong>or</strong> have a need f<strong>or</strong> courses not offered at their base school.<br />

The AIG Program provides quarterly updates f<strong>or</strong> schools to post on their websites <strong>or</strong> send home in<br />

school newsletters to inf<strong>or</strong>m parents of upcoming nomination and testing windows, identification<br />

procedures and current service delivery components.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Parent AIG presentations<br />

• School Based Committee Meeting Minutes<br />

• Power Point Presentations<br />

• Teacher planning sessions f<strong>or</strong> selection of service delivery options<br />

• WCPSS AIG Website updates<br />

• AIG Program Guide<br />

• AIG Parent Brochure<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice F<br />

Ensures collab<strong>or</strong>ation and involvement among regular education teachers, exceptional children's<br />

teachers, other specialists, instructional staff, parents/families, and administrat<strong>or</strong>s to provide<br />

differentiated programming and services.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program staff collab<strong>or</strong>ates and plans regularly with other professionals and<br />

parents to ensure appropriate services f<strong>or</strong> students.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Through the ongoing implementation of the Cooperative Teaching: Consultation and


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 43 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Collab<strong>or</strong>ation Model the AIG Resource Teachers facilitate differentiated curricula through direct<br />

and/<strong>or</strong> indirect services f<strong>or</strong> gifted and high ability learners. AIG Resource Teachers w<strong>or</strong>k in<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ation with regular education teachers to develop and implement resources, procedures,<br />

processes and strategies that provide challenge and enhance the quality of curriculum f<strong>or</strong> gifted and<br />

high ability students. Teachers differentiate, replace, supplement and/<strong>or</strong> modify curricula to facilitate<br />

higher-level learning goals by building upon and extending the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina Standard Course of<br />

Study.<br />

The Cooperative Teaching Consultation and Collab<strong>or</strong>ation Model is the primary structure f<strong>or</strong><br />

delivering AIG services to students. The model may include:<br />

• Team Teaching- regular classroom teachers and AIG Resource teachers plan and deliver<br />

differentiated instruction to identified students<br />

• Complementary Teaching- AIG Resource Teacher enriches the NC Standard Course of Study<br />

delivered in the regular classroom<br />

• Demonstration Teaching- AIG Resource Teacher models instruction on how to differentiate<br />

instruction to meet the diverse learning needs of students<br />

• Supp<strong>or</strong>tive Learning Activities- AIG Resource Teacher enriches <strong>or</strong> accelerates instruction through<br />

cluster grouping and learning stations within the regular classroom<br />

Regular education teachers, AIG Resource Teachers, administrat<strong>or</strong>s, and supp<strong>or</strong>t staff w<strong>or</strong>k together<br />

f<strong>or</strong> the common goal of providing students' educational experiences that extend students’ abilities,<br />

achievements, and interests. This collab<strong>or</strong>ative eff<strong>or</strong>t evokes intrinsic motivation f<strong>or</strong> students to rise to<br />

the challenges they are capable of meeting, and to become the 21st century learners they have the<br />

potential to be.<br />

School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE)<br />

Members of the SBCGE review and monit<strong>or</strong> the needs of identified AIG students. A school based<br />

administrat<strong>or</strong> (principal <strong>or</strong> assistant principal), the AIG Resource teacher, classroom teachers, school<br />

counsel<strong>or</strong>s, and instructional specialists serve on the SBCGE.<br />

The <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team<br />

Parents, principals, teachers, community members, central staff and others f<strong>or</strong>m the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education<br />

Leadership Team. This team meets 3-4 times each year to review the status of the AIG Program,<br />

contribute to continuous improvement, and assist with the development of the local AIG Plan.<br />

Instructional Services Division/ Curriculum and Instruction Department<br />

The AIG Program collab<strong>or</strong>ates with ISD/C&I professional staff to align the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina Standard<br />

Course of Study objectives, recommended best practices, assessment tools and build C-MAPP. AIG<br />

Program staff serves on learning teams to supp<strong>or</strong>t Goal 2014, strategic directives, and LEA<br />

directives.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education meeting notes<br />

• <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team agendas and notes<br />

• Parent Meeting agendas and notes<br />

• AIG School Delivery Plan<br />

• C-MAPP


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 44 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

• DCP<br />

• DEP<br />

• AIG Teacher Quarterly Responsibilities<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice G<br />

Ensures that school counseling personnel, regular education teachers, AIG specialists,<br />

parents/families, and others collab<strong>or</strong>ate to address the social and emotional needs of AIG students.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The unique social-emotional needs of gifted students require dedicated attention from<br />

educat<strong>or</strong>s and parents. The AIG Program recognizes these needs and has provided opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong><br />

teachers to learn m<strong>or</strong>e about addressing these needs. Additional time, professional development and<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ation with other agencies and personnel are required to strengthen this area.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice H<br />

Articulates and implements a process f<strong>or</strong> accelerative instructional and placement options when an<br />

appropriate body-of-evidence indicates that such a practice is warranted f<strong>or</strong> an individual gifted<br />

learner.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 45 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: <strong>Gifted</strong> students have a need and a right to advance through courses of study at a pace<br />

that accommodates and accelerates their learning appropriate to their interests and capability.<br />

<strong>Schools</strong> have a charge to meet these needs by offering options f<strong>or</strong> accelerated study.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Staff will insure that students with demonstrated and documented need f<strong>or</strong> acceleration<br />

receive academic opp<strong>or</strong>tunities to proceed m<strong>or</strong>e rapidly through the usual progression of required<br />

skills and objectives f<strong>or</strong> a given grade level <strong>or</strong> course of study, to w<strong>or</strong>k above the assigned grade<br />

level and complete studies at an earlier age when deemed appropriate.<br />

Differentiated Learning Opp<strong>or</strong>tunities<br />

Teachers w<strong>or</strong>k to meet the varied needs and learning styles of students. Teachers consult with<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Resource Teachers and the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong><br />

Education (SBCGE) f<strong>or</strong> supp<strong>or</strong>t with gifted learners.<br />

Needs assessment practices include:<br />

a. Identification f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> (AIG) Program services<br />

b. Review of student’s p<strong>or</strong>tfolio of advanced w<strong>or</strong>k samples, grades, products and perf<strong>or</strong>mances<br />

c. Recommendations by teachers, administrat<strong>or</strong>s and parents<br />

d. Review of all documentation by the SBCGE. Members of the SBCGE include a school<br />

administrat<strong>or</strong> (Principal <strong>or</strong> Assistant Principal), regular education teachers, AIG Resource Teacher,<br />

counsel<strong>or</strong>s, psychologists, and other professionals who w<strong>or</strong>k with the students recommended f<strong>or</strong><br />

acceleration.<br />

Recommended F<strong>or</strong>ms of Accelerative Practice<br />

1. Early Entrance to Kindergarten: (see School Admissions Policy 6201.1)<br />

2. Whole Grade Advancement: The need f<strong>or</strong> Whole Grade Advancement is determined on an<br />

individual basis. Students recommended f<strong>or</strong> Whole Grade Advancement must be identified as<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> and demonstrate characteristics consistent with the very strong<br />

level of need f<strong>or</strong> differentiation. The School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE) will<br />

request and review evidence indicating possible need f<strong>or</strong> whole grade advancement from regular<br />

education teachers, the AIG Resource Teacher, the psychologist serving the AIG Program, and a<br />

Central Service AIG Program administrat<strong>or</strong>. A student whose needs can be met by going to the next<br />

grade level f<strong>or</strong> instruction in reading/English language arts and/<strong>or</strong> mathematics is not necessarily a<br />

candidate f<strong>or</strong> whole grade advancement. The AIG Program identifies highly gifted students who are<br />

functioning at a minimum of 2 years <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e above age peers.<br />

3. Curriculum Compacting: Students may move rapidly through the curriculum if mastery is<br />

demonstrated by testing out of skills. Teacher <strong>or</strong> district created assessments and a p<strong>or</strong>tfolio of w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

samples and products can serve as indicat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> mastery. However, End-of- Grade and End-of-<br />

Course Tests may not be used f<strong>or</strong> placement decisions.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 46 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

4. Grade Telescoping: Student coursew<strong>or</strong>k is re<strong>or</strong>ganized vertically so that middle <strong>or</strong> high school<br />

requirements can be completed in less time. Middle and high school teachers and central services<br />

content specialists w<strong>or</strong>k collab<strong>or</strong>atively to design appropriate vertical alignment and re<strong>or</strong>ganization.<br />

5. Subject Area Acceleration: Students may be accelerated above grade level f<strong>or</strong> specific content<br />

area and course needs, without whole grade acceleration. Students whose perf<strong>or</strong>mance and interests<br />

indicate need f<strong>or</strong> acceleration two <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e years beyond age level peers in specific content areas<br />

may be referred to the SBCGE. A p<strong>or</strong>tfolio of student w<strong>or</strong>k that demonstrates a depth of conceptual<br />

understanding of the NC Standard Course of Study f<strong>or</strong> the current and succeeding grade levels will<br />

be reviewed. Indicat<strong>or</strong>s of advanced perf<strong>or</strong>mance and achievement in math and literacy profiles,<br />

reading levels, projects and other exemplary w<strong>or</strong>k products are considered by the SBCGE in<br />

determining need f<strong>or</strong> acceleration.<br />

6. Cross-Grade Grouping: Students from different grades who are perf<strong>or</strong>ming at the same level <strong>or</strong><br />

demonstrate the same level of readiness are grouped together regardless of age f<strong>or</strong> instruction.<br />

7. Concurrent Enrollment f<strong>or</strong> Content Area Needs: In rare cases, a student may require instruction at<br />

a different school (elementary to middle, middle to high school, high school to university) in a specific<br />

content area such as math. A recommendation from the School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong><br />

Education and the student's assigned school principal will be f<strong>or</strong>warded to the Central Services AIG<br />

program administrat<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> review.<br />

8. Advanced Placement: Students complete courses with advanced content<br />

9. Ment<strong>or</strong>ship: Students may be assigned to a professional <strong>or</strong> expert in a specific area of interest to<br />

expand experience and knowledge outside of the classroom<br />

10. NC Virtual Public School: Students may enroll in eLearning taught by NC-certified teachers.<br />

Grades will transfer to their local school and become part of their academic rec<strong>or</strong>d.<br />

11. High School Credit: Students complete courses f<strong>or</strong> high school credit while in middle school.<br />

12. Dual Enrollment: Students complete high schools courses toward graduation while concurrently<br />

taking university courses.<br />

13. Early high school graduation and admission to college: Students complete required and additional<br />

available coursew<strong>or</strong>k on an accelerated schedule at the high school level, graduate early, and then<br />

apply f<strong>or</strong> early admission to college.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Board Policy 5532 and R&P 5532 Acceleration and Academic Advancement<br />

• Documentation from Early Entry Applications<br />

• Whole Grade Advancement Recommendations<br />

• Advanced Placement Student Participation count<br />

Other Comments:


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 47 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice I<br />

Provides intentional services f<strong>or</strong> traditionally under-represented AIG populations, including<br />

culturally/ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, English language learners, highly gifted,<br />

and twice-exceptional.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System is committed to identifying the academic needs<br />

of high-functioning and high-potential students from all populations. The AIG Program offers<br />

academic nurturing and enrichment opp<strong>or</strong>tunities bef<strong>or</strong>e, during, and after f<strong>or</strong>mal identification f<strong>or</strong><br />

gifted education services. Nurturing eff<strong>or</strong>ts increase the development of academic and intellectual<br />

behavi<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> possible future identification as gifted f<strong>or</strong> all students in reading/language arts and/<strong>or</strong><br />

mathematics.<br />

As demographics in <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System continue to change, educat<strong>or</strong>s must learn<br />

how to better identify, serve, and sustain gifted students, including those who have previously gone<br />

undiscovered. The AIG Program seeks ways to identify and implement programming and specific<br />

nurturing initiatives to improve the representation, participation, and perf<strong>or</strong>mance of underrepresented<br />

populations such as:<br />

•Culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse (CLED)<br />

•Second Language Learners<br />

•African American Students<br />

•Latino Students<br />

•Native American Students<br />

•Asian American Students<br />

•High potential gifted students with special needs<br />

•Learning disabilities<br />

•Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Dis<strong>or</strong>der<br />

•Behavi<strong>or</strong>al/Emotional disabilities<br />

•Autism Spectrum Dis<strong>or</strong>der<br />

•Hearing impairments<br />

•Speech/Language impairments<br />

•Visual impairments<br />

•Other health impairments (i.e. diagnosed medical dis<strong>or</strong>der that impacts educational perf<strong>or</strong>mance-<br />

cerebral palsy, diabetes, sickle cell anemia)


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 48 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Goals: To increase the use of differentiated curriculum and instructional practices that nurture gifted<br />

intelligent behavi<strong>or</strong>s in traditionally underrepresented populations.<br />

Description: The AIG Program Nurturing Initiatives:<br />

• Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Third Grade Model<br />

• Project Bright IDEA Expansion (Grades K-8) focuses on new research-based approaches to<br />

nurturing and teaching children using an integrated concept-based curriculum and best practices f<strong>or</strong><br />

early identification and cultivation of high level potential in children.<br />

• Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with Intervention Alignment and SIOP initiatives<br />

• Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction Professional development offerings<br />

• Student Engagement Strategies professional development offerings<br />

• Cooperative Teaching Model<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Curriculum units f<strong>or</strong> Expl<strong>or</strong>ers<br />

• Curriculum Bank<br />

• Professional Learning Team w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

• Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers<br />

• AIG Teachers' agendas f<strong>or</strong> professional development offerings<br />

• Project Bright IDEA 2 – Aversb<strong>or</strong>o Elementary School<br />

• Project Bright IDEA 2 – Harris Creek and <strong>Wake</strong>lon Elementary <strong>Schools</strong><br />

• Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons - Building Better Thinking Skills Program - F<strong>or</strong>estville, Swift Creek, Brentwood and<br />

Lake Myra Elementary <strong>Schools</strong><br />

• Building Thinking Skills® provides highly effective verbal and nonverbal reasoning activities to<br />

improve students' vocabulary, reading, writing, math, logic, and figural-spatial skills, as well as their<br />

visual and audit<strong>or</strong>y processing. This program provides a solid foundation f<strong>or</strong> academic excellence<br />

and nurtures gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s. Teachers at Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons schools receive extensive training to<br />

impact instructional effectiveness.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 4: Comprehensive Programming within a Total School Community<br />

The LEA provides an array of K-12 programs and services by the total school community to meet the<br />

diverse academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice J<br />

Encourages extra-curricular programs and events that enhance and further develop the needs and<br />

interests of AIG students.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 49 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: Additional opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> enrichment exist outside of the classroom and the school.<br />

<strong>Gifted</strong> students benefit from innovative, challenging experiences.<br />

Goals: The AIG Program will promote and share inf<strong>or</strong>mation that may be of interest to students,<br />

parents and schools regarding opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> enrichment and interest.<br />

Description:<br />

• Duke TIP<br />

• <strong>Wake</strong> PAGE<br />

• Battle of the Books<br />

• Math Olympiad<br />

• Odyssey of the Mind<br />

• Ferrum College<br />

• University Academic Summer Camps<br />

• Camp Broadstone<br />

• Other inf<strong>or</strong>mation can be found at: http://www.nagc.<strong>or</strong>g/resourcedirect<strong>or</strong>y.aspx<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG website Listings<br />

• Programs and events updates to schools<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.<br />

Practice A<br />

Partners and communicates with parents/families and the community to ensure that the most<br />

appropriate services f<strong>or</strong> the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional needs of AIG students are<br />

provided.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong> and staff value feedback and suggestions from parents,<br />

administrat<strong>or</strong>s, teachers, students and other stakeholders f<strong>or</strong> evaluation and improvement of the AIG<br />

Program. These perspectives provide direction f<strong>or</strong> program improvement.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The Direct<strong>or</strong> of the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program establishes the <strong>Gifted</strong><br />

Education Leadership Team. The direct<strong>or</strong> invites participants representative of the local education


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 50 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

agency (LEA) and community. The leadership team conducts the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong><br />

Program review of the local Plan f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education and assesses the present program. The team<br />

assesses the representation of cultural and socio-economic groups in the program and makes<br />

recommendations to address inequities.<br />

Annual surveys, focus groups, interviews, and questionnaires may be included to reveal<br />

strengths and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> growth of the existing program. Data from these sources<br />

provide valuable direction in setting goals, writing objectives, and making<br />

recommendations f<strong>or</strong> the gifted program within the context of the total school program.<br />

The <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team meets at least three times yearly to review goals, objectives,<br />

and initiatives and makes recommendations f<strong>or</strong> review by the AIG Program.<br />

The <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team Members include:<br />

• Direct<strong>or</strong>, AIG Program<br />

• Psychologist f<strong>or</strong> the AIG Program, <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong><br />

• AIG Co<strong>or</strong>dinating Teachers<br />

• Principals<br />

• Elementary and Middle School AIG Resource Teachers<br />

• Regular Education Teachers<br />

• Agency representatives from interested groups: Partners f<strong>or</strong> the Advancement of <strong>Gifted</strong> Education<br />

(PAGE), Coalition of Concerned Citizens f<strong>or</strong> African American Children (CCCAAC) and others<br />

• Parent and Community Members (reflecting diversity of community)<br />

School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education(SBCGE)<br />

The SBCGE reviews nominations and referrals, makes identification recommendations, matches<br />

students' levels of service to student need, and co<strong>or</strong>dinates the Annual Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process.<br />

Parents may provide documentation to the SBCGE that demonstrates student academic strengths<br />

and request to meet with the SBCGE concerning the identification process. The SBCGE collab<strong>or</strong>ates<br />

with the Student Supp<strong>or</strong>t Team when students have other special needs. Likewise, the Student<br />

Supp<strong>or</strong>t Team (SST) w<strong>or</strong>k with the SBCGE when evidence is suggests that gifted services may be<br />

needed.<br />

Additional Community Outreach eff<strong>or</strong>ts:<br />

N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina State University, Duke University, St. Augustine College, Shaw University and other<br />

area institutions of higher learning provide student and professional ment<strong>or</strong>s and tut<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> students in<br />

need of advanced instruction as appropriate and as schedules permit.<br />

The Direct<strong>or</strong> of the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program and members of the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education<br />

Leadership Team meet with community members f<strong>or</strong> a variety of events and community meetings as<br />

appropriate.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 51 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Meeting agendas<br />

• Survey data<br />

• School Based Committee Meeting Minutes<br />

• Focus Group Feedback<br />

• AIG website<br />

• AIG Program Guide<br />

• AIG Parent Brochure<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.<br />

Practice B<br />

Shares with stakeholders, including all students' parents/families, inf<strong>or</strong>mation regarding the local AIG<br />

program, the local AIG plan, and other policies relating to gifted education.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program staff provides frequent, ongoing communication about <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s<br />

AIG Program to stakeholders. Opp<strong>or</strong>tunities to learn about the AIG Program are readily available at<br />

the school and district level.<br />

Goals: Update the WCPSS AIG website to reflect 2010-2013 AIG Plan. Share updated inf<strong>or</strong>mation<br />

with stakeholders through AIG Parent Guide and AIG Program Brochure. Update web-based<br />

technology to increase parent access to AIG inf<strong>or</strong>mation.<br />

Description: The AIG Program Plan is posted on the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System website<br />

along with links to the following documents and resources:<br />

• Early Entry to Kindergarten Procedures<br />

• Whole Grade Advancement Procedures<br />

• The NC Standard Course of Study<br />

• AIG Program Brochure<br />

• Eligibility f<strong>or</strong> Service<br />

• Identification Procedures<br />

• Chain of Inquiry About <strong>Gifted</strong> Services<br />

• Inf<strong>or</strong>mation f<strong>or</strong> Incoming Transfer Students<br />

• Parent/Staff Presentation PowerPoint<br />

• Model Overview PowerPoint<br />

• Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers PowerPoint<br />

• AIG Program Overview on Full Circle TV


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 52 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

AIG Resource Teachers at each school provide parent inf<strong>or</strong>mation sessions covering the following<br />

topics:<br />

• K-2 Service f<strong>or</strong> Early Identified Students<br />

• K-2 Parent Overview of the AIG Program<br />

• Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers Model<br />

• Third Grade Identification and Testing inf<strong>or</strong>mation<br />

• Fourth and Fifth Grade AIG service<br />

• Sixth Grade Middle School AIG service<br />

• Seventh and Eighth Grade AIG service<br />

AIG Direct<strong>or</strong> and Program Staff share inf<strong>or</strong>mation with community groups upon request.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Program Webpage<br />

• AIG Program Brochures<br />

• AIG Parent Guides<br />

• Agendas and attendance from inf<strong>or</strong>mation sessions<br />

• Presentations, Podcasts, Television video segments<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.<br />

Practice C<br />

Involves stakeholders, reflecting the diversity of AIG parents/families and the community, in the<br />

development, implementation, and monit<strong>or</strong>ing of the local AIG program and plan.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Stakeholder involvement is critical in the development of the AIG Program Plan and the<br />

success of the AIG Program implementation. Feedback from all perspectives is valuable in the<br />

evaluation of the AIG program.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: AIG Program Staff and AIG Resource teachers encourage and recruit parents, teachers<br />

and community members representative of the diversity, to participate in the development and<br />

monit<strong>or</strong>ing of programs and service. The following opp<strong>or</strong>tunities exist f<strong>or</strong> participation:<br />

• AIG Focus Group Sessions<br />

• <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team meetings three times each year<br />

• AIG Staff Participation at PAGE sessions


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 53 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

School Based Committee f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (SBCGE)<br />

The School Based Committee reviews nominations and referrals, makes identification<br />

recommendations, matches students' levels of service to student need, and co<strong>or</strong>dinates the Annual<br />

Perf<strong>or</strong>mance Review process. The SBCGE monit<strong>or</strong>s the application of the guidelines described in the<br />

AIG Program Plan and seeks to identify gifted students from under-represented populations without<br />

bias and with the use of alternate assessments and other evidences of gifted perf<strong>or</strong>mance.<br />

Central Services <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team<br />

The Direct<strong>or</strong> of the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program establishes the <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership<br />

Team. The direct<strong>or</strong> selects participants f<strong>or</strong> the at-large <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team that is<br />

representative of the local education agency (LEA) and community. The leadership team<br />

reviews the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program Review of LEA Plan f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education and<br />

assesses the present program. The team assesses the representation of cultural and socio-<br />

economic groups in the program and makes recommendations to address inequities.<br />

Annual surveys, focus groups, and interviews and questionnaires may be included to reveal<br />

strengths and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> growth of the existing program. Data from these sources<br />

provide valuable direction in setting goals, writing objectives, and making<br />

recommendations f<strong>or</strong> the gifted program within the context of the total school program.<br />

The <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team meets at least three times yearly to review goals, objectives,<br />

and initiatives and makes recommendations f<strong>or</strong> review by the AIG Program.<br />

The <strong>Gifted</strong> Leadership Team Members:<br />

• Direct<strong>or</strong>, AIG Program<br />

• Administrat<strong>or</strong>, AIG Program<br />

• Psychologist f<strong>or</strong> the AIG Program, <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong><br />

• Principals<br />

• Elementary and Middle School AIG Resource Teachers<br />

• Parent and Community Members (reflecting diversity of community)<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Focus Group Sessions<br />

• <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team meetings three times each year<br />

• AIG Staff Participation at PAGE sessions<br />

• Survey Results<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 54 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice D<br />

Inf<strong>or</strong>ms parents/families and the community of opp<strong>or</strong>tunities available to AIG students on an ongoing<br />

basis and in their native language.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Inf<strong>or</strong>mation about the AIG program is readily available on the WCPSS website and in<br />

brochures and documents in English. Some documents are available in Spanish, but there is a need<br />

f<strong>or</strong> translation into other languages represented by the student population. The AIG Program Office<br />

collab<strong>or</strong>ates with the ESL staff to translate parent letters and f<strong>or</strong>ms.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System contracts with Via Language to translate<br />

documents as needed into the top seven languages (Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, French, K<strong>or</strong>ean,<br />

Japanese, and Hindi). AIG Parent Brochures will be distributed to parents of limited English proficient<br />

(LEP) via WCPSS' Center f<strong>or</strong> International Enrollment located at the WCPSS Administration Building.<br />

WCPSS contracts with a team of seven interpreters who may help explain AIG Services to parents of<br />

LEP students.<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.<br />

Practice E<br />

Implements initiatives to intentionally involve parents/families and the community in meaningful ways<br />

to supp<strong>or</strong>t gifted education.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: In <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> the AIG Resource Teacher is primarily responsible f<strong>or</strong> communicating<br />

with and supp<strong>or</strong>ting families of AIG students. Linking AIG students and families with community<br />

resources will provide additional supp<strong>or</strong>t and inf<strong>or</strong>mation.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 55 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: Providing inf<strong>or</strong>mation about resources available to AIG students and their<br />

families will help meet the diverse interests and needs of our students. The <strong>Wake</strong> Partners f<strong>or</strong> the<br />

Advancement of <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (PAGE) offers many opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> parents and students to be<br />

actively engaged in gifted education.<br />

Standard 5: Partnerships<br />

The LEA ensures on-going and meaningful participation of stakeholders in the planning and<br />

implementation of the local AIG program to develop strong partnerships.<br />

Practice F<br />

F<strong>or</strong>ms partnerships with parents/families, institutions of higher education, local businesses and<br />

industry, and other stakeholders within the community to enhance and gain supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> AIG programs<br />

and services.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Community agencies and business partnerships can offer critical supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> gifted<br />

education and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> gifted learners. Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with colleges and universities will<br />

increase availability of accelerated learning pathways f<strong>or</strong> gifted students.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments: The Direct<strong>or</strong> of AIG Program provides community outreach eff<strong>or</strong>ts in the following<br />

ways:<br />

• Meets yearly with the Parents f<strong>or</strong> the Advancement of <strong>Gifted</strong> Education (PAGE) and Parent,<br />

Teacher, Student Association Councils (PTSA) upon request.<br />

• Meets with community members representing underserved/underrepresented/ at risk populations f<strong>or</strong>


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 56 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

a variety of events and community meetings as necessary.<br />

• Provides inf<strong>or</strong>mation about extra-curricular opp<strong>or</strong>tunities available to AIG students during the<br />

summer.<br />

• Provides inf<strong>or</strong>mation about the Duke Talent Identification Program (TIP) to the community and<br />

schools.<br />

• Partners with local colleges, universities, and businesses to provide professional ment<strong>or</strong>s and<br />

resources f<strong>or</strong> very strong AIG students as needed.<br />

• Provides essential nomination, referral, and identification documents and n<strong>or</strong>m referenced test<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>mation in English and Spanish as needed.<br />

• Facilitates meetings of the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team (GELT).<br />

Additional Community Outreach eff<strong>or</strong>ts:<br />

• N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina State University, Duke University, St. Augustine College, Shaw University and other<br />

area institutions of higher learning provide student and professional ment<strong>or</strong>s and tut<strong>or</strong>s f<strong>or</strong> students in<br />

need of advanced instruction as appropriate and as schedules permit.<br />

• The Direct<strong>or</strong> of the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program and members of the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education<br />

Leadership Team (GELT) meet with community members f<strong>or</strong> a variety of events and community<br />

meetings as appropriate.<br />

Communication to Parents:<br />

• School and PTSA/PTA newsletters provide inf<strong>or</strong>mation to parents/guardians about the AIG Program<br />

and events, program options, and nomination inf<strong>or</strong>mation. <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> School System AIG Program<br />

website events, nomination f<strong>or</strong>ms, AIG Parent Guide, AIG Program Brochure, and inf<strong>or</strong>mation f<strong>or</strong><br />

various program options. Essential documents are provided in English and Spanish.<br />

• The AIG Program Brochure is distributed to every school in the district and mailed to interested<br />

parents upon request.<br />

• The AIG Program Brochure is distributed to all third grade parents.<br />

• On-line surveys provide an opp<strong>or</strong>tunity f<strong>or</strong> parents and community members to provide feedback<br />

about the AIG Program; open-ended questions are provided.<br />

• Surveys are mailed to randomly selected households without access to email.<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice A<br />

Develops a written AIG plan describing the local AIG program in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with state legislation and<br />

policy, which has been approved by the LEA's school board and sent to SBE/DPI f<strong>or</strong> review and<br />

comment.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 57 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: The AIG <strong>Local</strong> plan has been reviewed by stakeholders and feedback has been used f<strong>or</strong><br />

revisions intended to improve the local program.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The WCPSS Central Services AIG Program staff has reviewed the program plan in all<br />

areas outlined in the template f<strong>or</strong> the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program<br />

Plan.<br />

Key stakeholder groups were identified and invited to provide input f<strong>or</strong> the <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong><br />

<strong>Gifted</strong> Plan 2010-2013 by evaluating the current plan’s strengths and opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> growth and<br />

providing suggestions f<strong>or</strong> revision.<br />

Stakeholder groups included the following: parents, AIG resource teachers (K-12); principals, regular<br />

education teachers, and seni<strong>or</strong> district leadership. Representatives from the educational and parent<br />

community have been invited to review and to provide comments on the revised plan.<br />

The AIG Program Plan draft will be submitted to the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System Board of<br />

Education f<strong>or</strong> review and approval. Once approved locally, the Plan will be submitted to the State<br />

Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruction.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• AIG Plan<br />

• Survey results<br />

• Data collected from Focus Group Sessions<br />

• Data collected during PAGE Super Saturday session<br />

• Interview results<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice B<br />

Monit<strong>or</strong>s the implementation of the local AIG program and plan in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with current legislation<br />

and state policies to ensure fidelity of implementation f<strong>or</strong> all AIG program components.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 58 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Rationale: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System is the largest school district in N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina.<br />

The AIG program must be closely monit<strong>or</strong>ed to ensure that services are delivered equitably and<br />

effectively in every school.<br />

Goals: The AIG Program will be carefully monit<strong>or</strong>ed at each school to ensure consistency in the<br />

delivery of AIG Program services from school to school. Principals will receive updates and reminders<br />

as to how AIG funds and personnel may be used.<br />

Description: AG Program Staff designs an annual plan f<strong>or</strong> review of each school's AIG student<br />

rec<strong>or</strong>ds f<strong>or</strong> accuracy of inf<strong>or</strong>mation, complete documentation, ISP, DEPS, and consent f<strong>or</strong>ms f<strong>or</strong><br />

evaluation and service.<br />

School Service Delivery Plans are signed by the principal and submitted by each school at the<br />

beginning of each school year. Implementation of plans are monit<strong>or</strong>ed by AIG Resource Teachers<br />

and AIG Program Staff.<br />

Elementary School Service Delivery Plans outlines services from the AIG Resource teacher,<br />

appropriate classroom grouping strategies, and content differentiation:<br />

-In-class flexible skills grouping<br />

-Cross class flexible skills grouping<br />

-Cluster grouping within class<br />

-Cross <strong>or</strong> multi-age grouping<br />

-Cross-grade grouping<br />

-Curriculum compacting<br />

-Differentiated instructional units<br />

-Centers<br />

-Computer-based instruction<br />

-Learning contracts with management plans<br />

-Independent Study<br />

-Individualized educational program<br />

-AIG Resource pull-out <strong>or</strong> team teaching (push-in) with AIG Resource Teacher (Required)<br />

-Third Grade Expl<strong>or</strong>ers (Required)<br />

Middle School Options provide appropriate classroom grouping strategies, grade level course<br />

offerings and content differentiation:<br />

-AIG Basics courses<br />

-Cluster grouping / Flexible skills grouping<br />

-Individualized instruction<br />

-Algebraic Thinking I, II and III<br />

-6th Grade Math<br />

-Advanced 6th Grade Math<br />

-7th Grade Math<br />

-Pre-Algebra<br />

-8th Grade Math<br />

-8th Grade Math Plus<br />

-Algebra I<br />

-Geometry


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 59 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

-Curriculum compacting<br />

-Differentiated instructional units/centers<br />

-Technology applications<br />

-Learning contracts /independent study<br />

-Ment<strong>or</strong>ship<br />

High School Service Options include:<br />

-Hon<strong>or</strong>s and AP English Courses Designated f<strong>or</strong> AIG Service<br />

-Hon<strong>or</strong>s and AP Math Courses Designated f<strong>or</strong> AiG Service<br />

-Guidance Supp<strong>or</strong>t<br />

-Dual enrollment<br />

-Seminar f<strong>or</strong>ums<br />

-Ment<strong>or</strong>ship<br />

-Internship<br />

-Course selection<br />

-College Planning<br />

-Motivation<br />

Quarterly Responsibilities Rep<strong>or</strong>t:<br />

AIG Resource Teachers are required to document accomplishment of duties and responsibilities at<br />

the end of each quarter and submit to the district AIG Direct<strong>or</strong>.<br />

AIG Teacher's Monthly Rep<strong>or</strong>t to the Principal:<br />

AIG Teachers meet monthly to inf<strong>or</strong>m the principal of w<strong>or</strong>k with AIG students, nurturing eff<strong>or</strong>ts to<br />

identify gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s in students from under-represented populations, parent inf<strong>or</strong>mation sessions,<br />

and upcoming testing and identification timelines.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• School File Review Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• Budget Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• AIG Teachers Quarter by Quarter Responsibilities Rep<strong>or</strong>t<br />

• Annual Parent Surveys<br />

• School Service Delivery Plan (signed by principal)<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 60 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice C<br />

Uses and monit<strong>or</strong>s state funds allotted f<strong>or</strong> the local AIG program acc<strong>or</strong>ding to state policy.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Funding f<strong>or</strong> AIG from the state is calculated at 4% of ADM, while we serve approximately<br />

18% of our total student population. Funds are limited and directed towards services f<strong>or</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program only.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: An annual budget plan is developed and monit<strong>or</strong>ed to ensure that expenditures are<br />

used only f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program services. A daily running budget w<strong>or</strong>kbook<br />

is updated with each expenditure and encumbrance. Quarterly rep<strong>or</strong>ts are generated and submitted<br />

to the Superintendent f<strong>or</strong> review. Annual business cases are developed and presented to the local<br />

Board of Education f<strong>or</strong> consideration f<strong>or</strong> increase of local AIG funding to supp<strong>or</strong>t expansion of AIG<br />

Program services in the subsequent school year.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Quarterly Budget Rep<strong>or</strong>ts<br />

• Running Daily Budget W<strong>or</strong>kbook<br />

• Business Cases<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice D<br />

Maintains, analyzes, and shares student perf<strong>or</strong>mance growth and annual drop-out data f<strong>or</strong> AIG<br />

students.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Student achievement data is one measure of the AIG Program's effectiveness. Causes of<br />

AIG dropout must be monit<strong>or</strong>ed so that interventions can be implemented to prevent AIG students<br />

from leaving school.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The Evaluation and Research Department of the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System<br />

provides the AIG Program Office with inf<strong>or</strong>mation related to the academic growth of <strong>Academically</strong>


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 61 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

<strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> students across the district. These data are used to inf<strong>or</strong>m decisions made by the<br />

AIG Program staff in the areas of professional development f<strong>or</strong> teachers, budgetary needs f<strong>or</strong><br />

resources and personnel, and service delivery f<strong>or</strong> students.<br />

The AIG Program Direct<strong>or</strong> participates in the Dropout Prevention Professional Learning Team's<br />

eff<strong>or</strong>ts to eliminate the causes of student dropout.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Student Achievement Data indicating AIG student success in reaching high growth targets<br />

• Actions steps and recommendations from the Dropout Prevention Professional Learning Team<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice E<br />

Monit<strong>or</strong>s the representation and retention of under-represented populations in the local AIG program,<br />

including students who are culturally/ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, English<br />

language learners, highly gifted, and twice-exceptional.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> AIG Program believes that gifted behavi<strong>or</strong>s can be nurtured and that<br />

we can increase the number of children from under-represented populations identified as gifted.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG Program collects and reviews data on the number of students from underrepresented<br />

populations that are identified as <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong>. Careful analysis of<br />

trends in Bright IDEA schools and Bright H<strong>or</strong>izons schools (Building Better Thinking Skills), is<br />

conducted to evaluate the impact of these programs in these eff<strong>or</strong>ts.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Data over time<br />

• Headcounts of AIG identified students by subgroups<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 62 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice F<br />

Maintains current data regarding the credentials of personnel serving AIG students.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: AIG Resource Teachers are required to hold full <strong>or</strong> provisional licensure in <strong>Academically</strong><br />

<strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Education in <strong>or</strong>der to be hired with AIG funds.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The Human Resources Department provides updated licensure rec<strong>or</strong>ds f<strong>or</strong> AIG<br />

Certified teachers to assist with identification and recruitment of AIG teachers f<strong>or</strong> the upcoming<br />

school year.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• List of AIG certified teachers with their allotted months of employment and school assignments<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice G<br />

F<strong>or</strong>ms an advis<strong>or</strong>y group of community members, parents/families of AIG students representative of<br />

diverse populations in the program, teachers of the gifted, and other professional staff who meet<br />

regularly to review all aspects of the local AIG program and make recommendations f<strong>or</strong> program<br />

improvement.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Program meets regularly with the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The AIG Program has established the <strong>Gifted</strong> Education Leadership Team (GELT) as an<br />

advis<strong>or</strong>y group. This team includes parents of AG identified students, principals and other


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 63 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

administrat<strong>or</strong>s, teachers, and AIG Program staff. This team meets a minimum of three times each<br />

year to provide input and feedback on program effectiveness and needs. The GELT assists in the<br />

development of survey questions, reviews results and provides feedback f<strong>or</strong> improvement in service<br />

and development and revision of the local AIG Program Plan.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Meeting agendas<br />

• Attendance rec<strong>or</strong>ds<br />

• Surveys<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice H<br />

Elicits regular feedback from students, parents/families, teachers, and other stakeholders regarding<br />

the quality and effectiveness of the local AIG program.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Stakeholder perception and feedback as to effectiveness of the AIG program is vital to<br />

continuous improvement. Eff<strong>or</strong>ts to gather feedback from students will increase.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: Electronic and paper surveys, focus group sessions, interviews, and parent meetings<br />

are conducted to evaluate the AIG Program in <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />

AIG teachers evaluate professional development provided by the AIG office throughout the year.<br />

These results are use to refine current offerings and develop m<strong>or</strong>e effective opp<strong>or</strong>tunities based on<br />

changing needs of teachers and schools.<br />

AIG teachers are asked to analyze their job descriptions and compare their day-to-day w<strong>or</strong>k with<br />

those descriptions. AIG teachers also compare the similarities and differences in their w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

responsibilities with other AIG teachers. These data are used to align the AIG Resource teachers’ job<br />

description roles and responsibilities with AIG Program goals.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 64 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Survey results<br />

• Focus group data<br />

• Interview notes<br />

• Parent and community session agendas<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice I<br />

Reviews and revises the local AIG program and plan based on multiple sources of data f<strong>or</strong><br />

continuous program improvement.<br />

This practice is a Focused Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Data must drive decision making f<strong>or</strong> continuous improvement. Feedback from surveys<br />

and focus groups, and student achievement growth data is used to measure effectiveness and set<br />

goals f<strong>or</strong> improving the program.<br />

Goals: Review and revise the AIG Plan quarterly based on data.<br />

Description: Opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> growth and continued improvement were identified during data<br />

collection from stakeholders and are addressed in this local plan. These areas are:<br />

•Improved communication from AIG resource teachers to parents regarding academic progress and<br />

needs of identified AIG students.<br />

•Clarity of inf<strong>or</strong>mation contained within the AIG Parent Guide and AIG Program Brochure.<br />

•Greater opp<strong>or</strong>tunities f<strong>or</strong> interaction and communication between the Middle School AIG resource<br />

teacher and AIG students and parents.<br />

•Continue to seek and identify gifted learners from under-represented populations.<br />

•Avoidance of scheduling conflicts with c<strong>or</strong>e instruction f<strong>or</strong> AIG students receiving direct service in<br />

elementary schools.<br />

*Collab<strong>or</strong>ation with Counseling and Student Services to address the social-emotional needs of gifted<br />

students.<br />

•Education of stakeholders regarding limited state funding and the need f<strong>or</strong> supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> increased<br />

funding. (The AIG Program is currently funded by the state at 4% of average daily membership f<strong>or</strong> a<br />

gifted population of 18% in <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Schools</strong>.)<br />

The results of the surveys and feedback from stakeholders impacted the revision of the plan.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 65 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Inf<strong>or</strong>mation and recommendations from the 2007 Curriculum Management Audit provides additional<br />

guidance f<strong>or</strong> the revision of the AIG Plan.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Executive Summary outlining revisions in the new plan<br />

• Focus group and survey results<br />

• AIG student growth data<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.<br />

Practice J<br />

Disseminates all data from evaluation of the local AIG program to the public.<br />

This practice is a Future Practice (2013-2016) f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: Stakeholders have a right to access results of AIG Program evaluation eff<strong>or</strong>ts.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the<br />

practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen<br />

categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Other Comments: During Phase 2, 2013-2016, web links will be posted on the AIG webpage so that<br />

parents and the community can access current student growth data.<br />

Ideas of Strengthening:<br />

Standard 6: Program Accountability<br />

The LEA implements, monit<strong>or</strong>s, and evaluates the local AIG program and plan to ensure that all<br />

programs and services are effective in meeting the academic, intellectual, social, and emotional<br />

needs of gifted learners.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 66 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Practice K<br />

Protects the rights of all AIG students through policies, procedures, and practices.<br />

This practice is a Maintained Practice f<strong>or</strong> 2010-2013.<br />

Rationale: The AIG Plan articulates and publishes identification procedures. Board Policies 5532<br />

Acceleration and Academic Achievement and 6230 Assurance of Appropriate Services f<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Students provide guidelines f<strong>or</strong> meeting the needs of gifted learners.<br />

Goals: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y of the practice.<br />

Description: The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program is governed by<br />

the requirements of N.C. General Statutes Article 9B. The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Intellectually</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program plan addresses identification and service delivery as<br />

required by law.<br />

WCPSS Board Policy<br />

6230.1<br />

N.C. General Statutes, Article 9B and the <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System define gifted students<br />

as follows:<br />

<strong>Academically</strong> <strong>or</strong> intellectually gifted students perf<strong>or</strong>m <strong>or</strong> show the potential to perf<strong>or</strong>m at high levels<br />

of accomplishments when compared with others their age, experience <strong>or</strong> environment. <strong>Academically</strong><br />

<strong>or</strong> intellectual gifted students exhibit high perf<strong>or</strong>mance capability in intellectual areas, specific<br />

academic fields, <strong>or</strong> in both intellectual areas and specific academic fields. <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>or</strong><br />

intellectually gifted students require differentiated education services beyond those <strong>or</strong>dinarily provided<br />

by the regular educational program. Outstanding abilities are present in students from all cultural<br />

groups, across all economic strata, and in all areas of human behavi<strong>or</strong>.<br />

6230.2<br />

The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program assures that all students<br />

identified as <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> will be provided appropriate differentiated services acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the<br />

local plan adopted by the Board of Education. The local plan shall be reviewed and revised, as<br />

needed, at least every three years.<br />

6230.3<br />

The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program identifies and services<br />

students who qualify f<strong>or</strong> Early Admission to Kindergarten as determined by the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina State<br />

Board of Education.<br />

6230.4<br />

The <strong>Wake</strong> <strong>County</strong> Public School System <strong>Academically</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> Program participates in the Govern<strong>or</strong>’s<br />

School Selection Process as determined by the N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina State Board of Education.


<strong>Local</strong> AIG Plan, 2010-2013 Page 67 of 67<br />

7/12/2010<br />

Planned Sources of Evidence:<br />

• Board Policies 5532 and 6230<br />

• AIG Identification Procedures<br />

Other Comments:<br />

Ideas of Strengthening: This section does not need to be completed based on the chosen categ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of the practice.<br />

Glossary (optional):<br />

Appendix (optional):<br />

Goal alignment_chart.docx (Appendix)<br />

Research Base f<strong>or</strong> Plan.doc (Appendix)<br />

Search process.doc (Appendix)<br />

AIG Acronyms.doc (Appendix)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!