21.07.2013 Views

HEAD & NECK SURGERY - Stanford University School of Medicine

HEAD & NECK SURGERY - Stanford University School of Medicine

HEAD & NECK SURGERY - Stanford University School of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S T ANFORD U NIVERSITY D EPARTMENT OF O TOLARYNGOLOGY– <strong>HEAD</strong> & N ECK S URGERY<br />

R ESEARCH P ROGRAMS<br />

THE EVALUATION, MANAGE-<br />

MENT, AND PREVENTION<br />

OF CISPLATIN OTOTOXICITY IN<br />

PEDIATRIC PATIENTS.<br />

Kay Chang, MD<br />

Cisplatin is a commonly administered<br />

chemotherapeutic agent in multiple<br />

pediatric neoplasms. The ototoxicity <strong>of</strong><br />

this agent is well-documented, though<br />

poorly characterized. Reports <strong>of</strong> ototoxicity<br />

rates in children vary from 1% to 82%.<br />

This disparity is due to extreme variability<br />

between institutions in the audiologic<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> sick pediatric patients, as<br />

well as the lack <strong>of</strong> a well established and<br />

clinically validated classification for<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> ototoxicity. The Common Terminology<br />

Criteria for Adverse Events<br />

(CTCAE v3.0) widely used by oncologists,<br />

fails to classify ototoxicity in a clinically<br />

consistent, or relevant manner.<br />

Due to a lack <strong>of</strong> a robust grading system<br />

for ototoxicity, it is difficult to design ototoxicity<br />

studies in patients that can be<br />

easily compared to other studies. I have<br />

developed a more clinically useful grading<br />

system for pediatric ototoxicity and<br />

have validated it to a large 5-year cohort<br />

<strong>of</strong> children treated by the Lucile Packard<br />

Children’s Hospital (LPCH) at <strong>Stanford</strong><br />

Pediatric Oncology department. By examining<br />

details such as dose delivery schedule<br />

and co-administered drugs, a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> interesting revelations regarding optimal<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> reducing ototoxicity in<br />

children have been discovered, and will<br />

be presented at the next ASCO meeting.<br />

As an active member <strong>of</strong> the Children’s<br />

Oncology Group (COG), a national organization<br />

involved in improving the oncologic<br />

care <strong>of</strong> children, I have been intimately<br />

involved in the ototoxicity<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> multiple large multi-institutional<br />

studies administered by COG<br />

12<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

dB<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

Post-Treatment DPOAEs<br />

2000 2378 2828 3364 4000 4757 5657 6727 8000 9514 11314 13454 16000<br />

Hz<br />

(including the Intergroup Hepatoblastoma<br />

Study P9645 and the ARAR0331<br />

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study). This<br />

grading system has been a valuable tool<br />

and has helped to improve methodologies<br />

for accurately assessing and characterizing<br />

ototoxic effects. This is particularly<br />

important since children seem to be<br />

much more susceptible to ototoxicity<br />

than adults. Furthermore, while the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> ototoxicity may be quite limited in<br />

adults who have mastered speech and<br />

language, in pre-lingual young children,<br />

ototoxicity may result in severe speech<br />

delay and the inability to ever assume a<br />

normal role in society. So while the children<br />

may be cured <strong>of</strong> their cancer, they<br />

really never fully recover from their treatment<br />

to live normal unhindered lives.<br />

While accurately monitoring cisplatin<br />

ototoxicity may provide some insights<br />

into improved dosing strategies for<br />

reducing adverse effects in children, a<br />

more exciting approach is actual prevention<br />

<strong>of</strong> ototoxicity by administering various<br />

“otoprotective” agents. In the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> investigating the protective effect <strong>of</strong><br />

the anti-oxidant N-acetylcysteine in the<br />

guinea pig cochlea, my laboratory discovered<br />

a novel otoprotective effect<br />

induced by the transtympanic administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> lactate to the middle ear. In<br />

this experiment, guinea pigs treated with<br />

cisplatin that were administered either<br />

lactated Ringer’s solution or N-acetylcysteine<br />

had significantly improved cochlear<br />

function, as measured by DPOAE, compared<br />

to the normal saline and negative<br />

control groups (see figure). Currently,<br />

with the collaboration the LPCH Pediatric<br />

Oncology department, standardized protocols<br />

utilizing my grading scale are<br />

being developed to investigate these as<br />

well as other otoprotective agents, including<br />

EPO and several gene therapy<br />

agents. Our goal is with these<br />

efforts is to eliminate this most<br />

devastating late-effect <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy<br />

in young children.<br />

Legend<br />

IR<br />

N-AC<br />

NS<br />

Control<br />

Mean post-treatment DPOAE data. Stimulus<br />

parameters were L2 = 55 dB and F2 ranging<br />

from 2 to 16 kHz. Error bars represent one<br />

SEM, and are plotted for the Control and LR<br />

groups; however they were comparable<br />

across all 4 groups (average SEM across frequencies<br />

measured 2.88, 3.27, 2.93, and 2.78<br />

for the 4 groups). The light dotted line at the<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the graph represents the average<br />

noise floor during emission recording.<br />

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN SLEEP<br />

<strong>SURGERY</strong><br />

Richard L. Goode, MD, Jose E. Barrera, MD,<br />

Nelson Powell, MD, Robert Riley, MD<br />

The Division <strong>of</strong> sleep surgery aims to<br />

develop improved diagnostic methods<br />

in evaluating site <strong>of</strong> obstruction in sleep<br />

apnea patients. We are taking two<br />

approaches to improve our understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the anatomic reasons for collapse<br />

<strong>of</strong> the upper airway in obstructive sleep<br />

apnea. A protocol which is being coordinated<br />

with Dr. Gerald Popelka will utilize<br />

cine real-time MRI scanning <strong>of</strong> the upper<br />

airway in patients with sleep disordered<br />

breathing and normal volunteers, and<br />

correlate these findings with the endoscopic<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> patients before and<br />

after surgery. Electroencephalogram,<br />

actigraphy, and pulse oximetry data in<br />

combination with MRI images will be<br />

collected from patients with upper airway<br />

resistance syndrome, obstructive<br />

sleep apnea, and normal controls. We expect<br />

to be able to significantly improve<br />

our understanding <strong>of</strong> the anatomic reasons<br />

for a given patient’s obstructive<br />

symptoms, and thus improve clinical<br />

staging and surgical decision-making.<br />

Real time MRI scan<br />

Our second project aims to evaluate<br />

functional obstruction during sleep as a<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> pressure manometry. The use<br />

<strong>of</strong> a multi-site pressure probe tube that<br />

is worn during sleep will be utilized to<br />

determine the site <strong>of</strong> obstruction based<br />

on pressure changes across five transducers<br />

within the probe tube precisely<br />

located in the upper airway. We hope to<br />

characterize what causes multi-site<br />

obstruction and to what degree patients<br />

with with obstructive sleep apnea are<br />

affected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!