23.07.2013 Views

GMPHIS SCRIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo

GMPHIS SCRIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo

GMPHIS SCRIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rqrclk review<br />

it{erv edition of Die Flechten BadeniV,i.xrttembergs<br />

Wirth, V. i995 Die Flechten Baden-Wtirttemfsergs,2.<br />

Auflage, Teil I-2. Verlag Eugen<br />

Ulrner, Stuttgart. 1006 pp. In German.<br />

Thc first edition of Volkmar Wirth's beautiful<br />

bock Die Flechten Baden-Wiirttembergs came in<br />

t987. It was a great help for many people with a<br />

starting interest in lichens. I remember often<br />

using the book and its excellent photographs in<br />

some brave attempts to at least get the correct<br />

gelieric names for my collections. And I don't<br />

tiiink tr was the only person who tried this 'easy<br />

n,f,y' after big frustrations over a difficult<br />

geiieral key.<br />

In 1995, this second edition appeared.<br />

Vihiie the first edition was one book, this edition<br />

ccnsists of two big volumes stuffed with inforrnation<br />

about the lichens of this German province.<br />

It now contains 555 colour photographs<br />

and about 1000 distribution maps, ffid, in<br />

ccntrast to the first edition, it has now become a<br />

r*al flora.<br />

The photographs makes up a very important<br />

part of this flora. They show the beauty and the<br />

obscurity of the lichens in a way that immediately<br />

gets one fascinated. I believe an important<br />

airn of the flora is to arouse interest in lichens, a<br />

group of organisms that have suffered much<br />

because of increased air pollution, modern<br />

forestry and an extensive agricultural developrnent.<br />

The photographs are in general of high<br />

quality. They are sharp, and in a high degree<br />

showing the correct colours of the species. Most<br />

of the pictures are close-up photographs showing<br />

important morphological characters, but there<br />

are also some good habitat photographs, as those<br />

of tho roof with Rhizocafpon spp. and the forest<br />

with Lobaria pulmonaria. There are only some<br />

very few photographs which could be improved,<br />

e"g" that of Clstocoleus ebenus (p. 368), which<br />

does not tell us much more than what is said in<br />

rhe text, and the left-hand picture of Lobaria<br />

amplissima (p. 560), which is not good,<br />

although it shows a large specimen with cephalodia.<br />

I suspect that the photograph of Tephromela<br />

aglaea in the reality shows T. perlata, a<br />

species not known from Germany yet. This<br />

collections of excellent colour photographs of<br />

lichens is overwhelming, ild must be the largest<br />

ever published. I get inspired to try some lichen<br />

photography myself, and I miss a chapter with<br />

technical advice !<br />

Nearly all the illustrations have a short and<br />

informative figure text. I noticed that the texts<br />

for C)phelium tigillare and C. karelicum are<br />

mixed up.<br />

The text is filled with general information<br />

about lichens and more specific distribution<br />

maps, keys, and notes on the species. The introductory<br />

chapters give general information about<br />

lichen ecology, distribution, collecting, significant<br />

characters and anatomy, chemistry, and<br />

decline of lichens. In these chapters, the terminology<br />

and abbreviations used later in the books<br />

are explained. A heavy use of abbreviations<br />

makes the text somewhat difficult to use in the<br />

start; one has to turn to at least 10 pages in the<br />

introductory chapters to fully understand the<br />

keys and the species accounts.<br />

The book is full of precise ecological and<br />

distributional data which, as far as I know, has<br />

not been presented or discussed in scientific<br />

papers. I miss an explanation of how the data<br />

were collected, and also more statistic presentation<br />

of some of the data. Especially, in the<br />

chapters on threatened species (pp. I3-L7 , 43-<br />

44) a statistical treatment would have given a<br />

better explanation of the chosen redlist category<br />

for the various species. I also observe that the<br />

German redlist categories ate rather different<br />

from the international IUCN categories (p. 43),<br />

and miss an explanation of why it is so, and how<br />

these corresponds to the international standard<br />

codes.<br />

Continues on page 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!