CTA's 2nd Brief & Response to Plaintiff's 1st Brief - National Center ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 4 of 80 ID: 7418245 DktEntry: 45-1 I1 . Even Assuming Dr . Corbett Violated the Establishment Clause. He Is Entitled to Qualified Imunity .................................. 38 A . The District Court Properly Exercised Its Discretion in Allowing Dr . Corbett and the School District to Amend Their Answer and Obtain a Ruling on Qualified Immunity ............................. 38 . 1 Defendants Did Not Waive Qualified Immunity Defense 39 2 . The District Court Acted Well Within Its Discretion in Granting Leave to Amend under Rule 15(a) ............. 46 ... a . No bad faith Existed ........................... 48 b . Defendants Did Not Unduly Delay in Moving to Amend ..................................... 51 c . Motion to Amend Was Not Futile ................ 52 . ................ d No Undue Prejudice Was Caused 53 B . The Particular Constitutional Right Alleged by Plaintiff Was Not Clearly Established and Thus Dr . Corbett Is Entitled to Qualified Immunity .............................................. 57 I11 . The Denial of Declaratory Relief Should Be Affirmed ............... 65 A . PlaintifPs Claim for Declaratory Relief is Moot ............... 65 B . Even If Not Moot. The District Court Correctly Denied Declaratory Relief ................................................. 67 CONCLUSION ................................................... 68 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ................................... 69
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 5 of 80 ID: 7418245 DktEntry: 45-1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES American Family Association v. City and County of San Francisco, 277 F.3d 11 14, 1121. (9th Cir. 2002) [cert. den. 537 U.S. 886, 123 S.Ct. 129,154 L.Ed.2d 146 (2002)l ...................... .24,29,32,60,62 Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635,640 (1987) ..................... 57,58 Anthoine v. North Central Counties Consortium, 605 F.3d 740,749 (9" Cir. 2010) ............................. 26,35 Bauchman v. West High Schl., 132 F.d 542 (loth Cir. 1997) ............. 61,66 Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212,1220 (9" Cir. 2007) ................. 58,63 Bilbrey by Bilbrey v. Brown, 73 8 F.2d 1462 (9fi Cir. 1984) ................. 67 Blanford v. Sacramento County, 406 F.3d 1 1 10,1114- 15 (9"' Cir. 2005) ....... 6 Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226,248, 1 10 S.Ct. 2356,2370-71, 110 L.Ed.2d 191 (1990) ............................. .24,27,28,30 Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194,195 and n.2 (2004) (per curiam) ............... 41,58,63 Brown v. Woodland Joint Unzj?ed School District, 27 F.3d 1373,1379 (9th Cir. 1994) ......................... 24,32,61 Camarilla v. McCarthy, 998 F.2d 638,639 (9th Cir. 1993) ........... 40,42,44 Cammack v. Waihee, 932 F.2d 765 (9"' Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1219, 112 S.Ct 3027, 120 L.Ed.2d 898 (1992) ....................................... 23
Page 1 and 2: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 1 o
Page 3: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 3 o
Page 11 and 12: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 11
Page 13 and 14: encourages students to test their i
Page 15 and 16: (3) Whether the District Court abus
Page 21 and 22: Dr. Corbett also encourages student
Page 25 and 26: Id at 521. Case: 09-56689 07/26/201
Page 33 and 34: to pass muster. Edwards v. Aguillar
Page 37 and 38: The District Court correctly determ
Page 41 and 42: attendance correlations by omitting
Page 55 and 56:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 55
Page 57 and 58:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 57
Page 59 and 60:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 59
Page 61 and 62:
explanation of delay and acted prom
Page 63 and 64:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 63
Page 65 and 66:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 65
Page 67 and 68:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 67
Page 69 and 70:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 69
Page 71 and 72:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 71
Page 73 and 74:
Judicial treatment of qualified imm
Page 75 and 76:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 75
Page 77 and 78:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 77
Page 79 and 80:
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify
show all

CTA's 2nd Brief & Response to Plaintiff's 1st Brief - National Center ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?