CTA's 2nd Brief & Response to Plaintiff's 1st Brief - National Center ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 6 of 80 ID: 7418245 DktEntry: 45-1 Campbell v . Emory Clinic. 166 F.3d 1 157 (1 lth Cir . 1999) ................. 55 Castaldo v . S<strong>to</strong>ne. 192 F . Supp.2d 1 124 (D . Colo . 200 1) .................. 50 Cole v . Oroville Union High Schl . Dist., 228 F.3d 1092.109 7-98 (9" Cir . 2000) ....................... 6.65. 66 Craig v . Boren. 429 U.S. 190. 192 (1976) .............................. 65 DiRuzza v . County of Teharna. 206 F.3d 1304. 13 14 (9th Cir . 2000) ....... 41. 58 Edwards v . Aguillard. 482 U.S. 578.583. 107 S.Ct. 2573.2577. 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987) .............................. .22.35.36. 62 Eminence Capital. LLC v . Aspeon. Inc., 3 16 F.3d 1048. 1052 (9'h Cir . 2003) (per curiam) .................... 46 Epperson v . Arkansas. 393 U.S. 97. 104. 89 S.Ct. 266. 21 L.Ed.2d 228 (1968) ......... 21.27. 61 Eng v . Cooley. 552 F.3d 1062. 1071 (9th Cir.2009) ....................... 26 Evans v . Fogarty. 2007 WL2380990 (10"' Cir . 2007) (unpublished) .......... 44 Fleischfresser v . Direc<strong>to</strong>rs of School Dist., 200 15 F.3d 680. 688 (7th Cir . 1994) ....................... 23.32. 61 Freitag v . Ayers. 468 F.3d 528. 545 (9'h Cir . 2006) ....................... 26 Fogel v . Collins. 531 F.3d 824. 827 (9" Cir . 2008) ........... 41. 58.59.60. 63 Fornan v . Davis. 371 U.S. 178. 182 (1962) ........................... 51. 53 Garcetti v . Ceballos. 547 U.S. 41 0. 421 (2006) .......................... 26 Gornez v . Toledo. 446 U.S. 635. 640 (1980) .......................... 43. 47
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 7 of 80 ID: 7418245 DktEntry: 45-1 Government Employees Ins . Co . v . Dizol, ............................ 133 F.3d 1220. 1223 (9thCir.1998) 7. 67 Graves v . City of Coewr D 'Alene. 339 F.3d 828 (gth Cir . 2003) ........ 41.42. 44 Grove v . Mead 753 F.2d 1528. 1534 (9th Cir . 1985) ....... .21.32.38.60.61. 62 Harlow v . Fitzgerald. 457 U.S. 800 (1982) ............................. 47 Harrison Beverage Co . v . Dribeck Importers. Inc., 133 F.R.D. 463.468.46 9-70 (D . N.J. 1990) ....................... 56 Hazelwood School Dist . v . Kuhlmeier. 484U.S. 260.267. 108 S.Ct. 562. 568 (1988) 34 ...................... Hiibel v . Sixth Judicial Dist . Ct . of Nev., 542 U.S. 177 (2004) ............. 41 James v . Rowlands. 606 F.3d 646. 650 (9th Cir . 2010) ............... 41.58. 59 Jackson v . Bank of Hawaii. 902 F.2d 1385.138 7.88 (9th Cir . 1990) .......... 55 Kennedy v . City of Ridgefield. 439 F.3d 1055. 106 1 (9" Cir . 2006) .......... 58 Kreisner v . City of San Diego. 1 F.3d 775. 781 (9" Cir . 1993) ......... 22.24. 60 Kwai Fun Wong v . United States. 373 F.3d 952. 957 (9" Cir . 2004) .... 40.41. 44 Lemon v . Kurtz~nan. 403 U.S. 602.612. 91 S.Ct. 2105. -9 29 L.Ed.2d 745. (1971) .............................................. passim Lynch v . Donnelly. 465 U.S. 668.694. 104 S.Ct. 1355. 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) .................................. 22.23. 60 Malleyv . Briggs. 475 U.S. 335. 341 (1986) ............................. 58
Page 1 and 2: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 1 o
Page 5: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 5 o
Page 11 and 12: Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 11
Page 13 and 14: encourages students to test their i
Page 15 and 16: (3) Whether the District Court abus
Page 21 and 22: Dr. Corbett also encourages student
Page 25 and 26: Id at 521. Case: 09-56689 07/26/201
Page 33 and 34: to pass muster. Edwards v. Aguillar
Page 37 and 38: The District Court correctly determ
Page 41 and 42: attendance correlations by omitting
Page 57 and 58:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 57
Page 59 and 60:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 59
Page 61 and 62:
explanation of delay and acted prom
Page 63 and 64:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 63
Page 65 and 66:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 65
Page 67 and 68:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 67
Page 69 and 70:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 69
Page 71 and 72:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 71
Page 73 and 74:
Judicial treatment of qualified imm
Page 75 and 76:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 75
Page 77 and 78:
Case: 09-56689 07/26/2010 Page: 77
Page 79 and 80:
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify
show all

CTA's 2nd Brief & Response to Plaintiff's 1st Brief - National Center ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?