24.07.2013 Views

Transitive verbs with non-accusative alternation in ... - Pluto Huji Ac Il

Transitive verbs with non-accusative alternation in ... - Pluto Huji Ac Il

Transitive verbs with non-accusative alternation in ... - Pluto Huji Ac Il

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

Rivka Halevy<br />

‘The demonstrators called on the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Treasury to<br />

immediately beg<strong>in</strong> negotiations <strong>with</strong> the students’<br />

Like many other properties of the event, the <strong>in</strong>tention to realize the action is<br />

discourse-determ<strong>in</strong>ed, it is not just a property of one of the elements of the<br />

clause. In (10), e.g., the <strong>in</strong>tention is to realize the dream that the A had<br />

always had, and <strong>in</strong> (11), it is to negotiate immediately <strong>with</strong> the students.<br />

The English paraphrase of hitxil be- would then be ‘actually start <strong>with</strong>’ or<br />

‘start <strong>with</strong> a clear <strong>in</strong>tention to fulfill the mission’.<br />

2.2. Participant role: O<br />

2.2.1. Individuation of the O entity<br />

<strong>Ac</strong>cord<strong>in</strong>g to Hopper and Thompson’s (1980: 286) def<strong>in</strong>ition, <strong>in</strong>dividuation<br />

is “the degree to which the entity referred to by the NP is discrete, bounded<br />

and separated from its environment”. The properties of <strong>in</strong>dividuated<br />

objects, accord<strong>in</strong>g to their parameterized theory of transitivity are: proper,<br />

human/animate, concrete, s<strong>in</strong>gular, count, and referential/def<strong>in</strong>ite (Hopper<br />

and Thompson 1980: 253).<br />

In the <strong>accusative</strong> construal of the scene, the dist<strong>in</strong>ctness of O from A and<br />

its dist<strong>in</strong>ctness from its background environment are unmarked, not only <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of its <strong>in</strong>dividuality as a particular and discrete entity, but also <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of assign<strong>in</strong>g prom<strong>in</strong>ence to it as a figure <strong>in</strong> the scene. Thus, the O is<br />

susceptible of be<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>non</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dividuated entity, as expressed, e.g. by an<br />

<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite noun, as <strong>in</strong> (12), or a generic noun, as <strong>in</strong> (13) and <strong>in</strong> (14), where<br />

it has a metaphorical read<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

(12) kulam lehaxziq {Ø/??be-} yadayim (class 8)<br />

everybody to-hold {Ø/??<strong>in</strong>-} hands<br />

‘Everybody hold hands’<br />

(13) ‘axbarim mexarsemim {0/??be-} bad (class 6)<br />

mice gnaw {Ø/??<strong>in</strong>-} cloth<br />

‘Mice gnaw cloth’<br />

(14) mi še-mider ‘et ha-sarim ve-qitsets lahem<br />

he-who compartmentalized OM the-m<strong>in</strong>isters and-cut-off to-them<br />

{Ø/??be-} knafayim ba-šana va-xetsi ha-'axrona<br />

(Haaretz 21.2.01) (class 4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!