24.07.2013 Views

The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION UNDER EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ■<br />

Introduction<br />

This report <strong>of</strong>fers an overview <strong>of</strong> the protection from discrimination <strong>under</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Convention on <strong>Human</strong><br />

Rights and the Revised <strong>European</strong> Social Charter, and seeks to identify aspects <strong>of</strong> that protection which could<br />

influence the outstanding questions <strong>of</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> Directive 2000/43/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 June 2000 implementing the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> equal treatment between persons irrespective <strong>of</strong> racial or ethnic origin1 and Directive 2000/78/EC <strong>of</strong><br />

27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation2 .<br />

Although other instruments adopted within the Framework <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe may also in the future<br />

influence the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the directives, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as they contain clauses protecting from discrimination based<br />

on the membership <strong>of</strong> a national minority3 or on genetic heritage, 4 grounds which intersect with those <strong>of</strong> religion<br />

or ethnic origin or <strong>of</strong> disability, the <strong>European</strong> Convention on <strong>Human</strong> Rights has been recognized to have a<br />

particular significance in <strong>European</strong> Union law, and its requirements are to be considered part <strong>of</strong> the general<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> Union law which the <strong>European</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Justice applies as part <strong>of</strong> its task <strong>of</strong> ensuring that the law is<br />

respected in the application <strong>of</strong> the Treaties. 5 <strong>The</strong> reference to the <strong>European</strong> Social Charter is justified to the extent<br />

that the <strong>European</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Justice has occasionally referred to that instrument for the interpretation <strong>of</strong> EC law. 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> report is structured in three parts. Part I <strong>of</strong>fers an overview <strong>of</strong> the anti-discrimination clauses <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong><br />

Convention on <strong>Human</strong> Rights and <strong>of</strong> the relevant case-law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> Rights. Part II<br />

examines the protection from discrimination <strong>under</strong> the <strong>European</strong> Social Charter, <strong>under</strong> the interpretation given to<br />

the Charter by the <strong>European</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> Social Rights (previously the Committee <strong>of</strong> Independent Experts)<br />

either in its conclusions adopted on the basis <strong>of</strong> the periodic State reports, or in the context <strong>of</strong> collective<br />

complaints. Part III examines the relationship <strong>of</strong> these instruments and the case-law <strong>of</strong> those bodies to the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC. Certain general comments are <strong>of</strong>fered, after which an<br />

overview is proposed, ground per ground, <strong>of</strong> the questions <strong>of</strong> interpretation which the <strong>European</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong><br />

Rights and the <strong>European</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> Social Rights have addressed, to the extent that they may influence the<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> the directives.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

OJ L 180 <strong>of</strong> 19.7.2000, p. 22.<br />

OJ L 303 <strong>of</strong> 2.12.2000, p. 16.<br />

Framework Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> National Minorities (ETS n° 157), signed in Strasbourg on 1 February 1995, in force on 1 February<br />

1998 : see Art. 4. On 15 January 2005,<strong>The</strong> Framework Convention had been ratified by all the Member States <strong>of</strong> the EU, with the exception <strong>of</strong><br />

Belgium, France, Greece, Latvia, Luxemburg and the Netherlands.<br />

Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> Rights and Dignity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Human</strong> Being with Regard to the Application <strong>of</strong> Biology and Medicine :<br />

Convention on <strong>Human</strong> Rights and Biomedicine (ETS n° 164), signed in Oviedo on 4 April 1997, in force on 1 December 1999: see Article 11.<br />

See, in the context <strong>of</strong> the EC Treaty, article 220 EC.<br />

Case 149/77, Defrenne v. Sabena [1978] ECR 1365, at para. 26. See also Case 6/75, Horst v. Bundesknappschaft [1975] ECR 823, at 836.<br />

9<br />

thematic report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!