The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

thematic report
■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION UNDER EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ■
Cases
European Court of Human Rights (in chronological order)
Eur. Ct. HR, Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22
Eur. Ct. HR, Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A n°31
Eur. Ct. HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52
Eur. Ct. HR, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. United Kingdom, judgment of 29 May 1985, Series A n°94
Eur. Ct. HR, Inze v. Austria, judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A n° 126
Eur. Ct. HR, F v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 December 1987, Series A n°128
Eur. Ct. HR, Mellacher and Others v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989
Eur. Ct. HR, Fredin v. Sweden, judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A n° 192
Eur. Ct. HR, Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment of 25 May 1993
Eur. Ct. HR, Hoffmann v. Austria, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A n° 255-C
Eur. Ct. HR, Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B
Eur. Ct. HR, Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B
Eur. Ct. HR, Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A n° 295-A
Eur. Ct. HR, Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994
Eur. Ct. HR, Vogt v. Germany, judgment of 20 November 1995
Eur. Ct. HR, Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336
Eur. Ct. HR, Gaygusuz v. Austria, judgment of 16 September 1996
Eur. Ct. HR, Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, judgment of 21 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, p. 184
Eur. Ct. HR, Kalaç v.Turkey (Appl. N° 20704/92), judgment of 1 July 1997, Rep. 1997-IV
Eur. Ct. HR, Botta v. Italy judgment of 24 February 1998
Eur. Ct. HR, Petrovic v. Austria, judgment of 27 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 587
Eur. Ct. HR, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (Appl. N° 22774/93), judgment of 28 July 1999, Reports 1999-V
Eur. Ct. HR, Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1999
Eur. Ct. HR, Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 31417/96 and 32377/96), judgment of 27
September 1999
Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (Appl. N° 33290/96), judgment of 21 December 1999,
ECHR 1999-IX
Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), Mazurek v. France (Appl. N° 34406/97), judgment of 1 February 2000
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Thlimmenos v. Greece (Appl. N° 34369/97), judgment of 6 April 2000
Eur. Ct. HR, Shackell v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 45851/99), decision of 27 April 2000
Eur. Ct. HR, Rotaru v. Romania, judgment of 4 May 2000
Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 35765/97), judgment of 31 July 2000, ECHR 2000-IX
Eur. Ct. HR(GC), Chapman v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°27238/95), judgment of 18 January 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Beard v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°24882/94), judgment of 18 January 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Coster v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°24876/94), judgment of 18 January 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Jane Smith v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°25154/94), judgment of 18 January 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Lee v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 25289/94), judgment of 18 January 2001
Eur. Ct. HR, Dahlab v. Switzerland (Appl. no. 42393/98), judgment of 15 February 2001, ECHR 2001-V
Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 24746/94), judgment of 4 May 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Cyprus v.Turkey (Appl. N° 25781/94), judgment of 10 May 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), Mata Estevez v. Spain (Appl. N° 56501/00), dec. of 10 May 2001, Rep. 2001-VI
Eur. Ct. HR (3d section), Price v. the United Kingdom judgment of 10 July 2001 (Appl. N° 33394/96)
Eur. Ct. HR (3d section), Pichon et Sajous v. France (Appl. n° 49853/99), decision of 2 October 2001
Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), McShane v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 43290/98), judgment of 25 May 2002
56