The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

More documents

Recommendations

Info

thematic report ■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION UNDER EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ■ Cases European Court of Human Rights (in chronological order) Eur. Ct. HR, Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22 Eur. Ct. HR, Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A n°31 Eur. Ct. HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52 Eur. Ct. HR, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. United Kingdom, judgment of 29 May 1985, Series A n°94 Eur. Ct. HR, Inze v. Austria, judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A n° 126 Eur. Ct. HR, F v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 December 1987, Series A n°128 Eur. Ct. HR, Mellacher and Others v. Austria, judgment of 19 December 1989 Eur. Ct. HR, Fredin v. Sweden, judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A n° 192 Eur. Ct. HR, Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment of 25 May 1993 Eur. Ct. HR, Hoffmann v. Austria, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A n° 255-C Eur. Ct. HR, Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 280-B Eur. Ct. HR, Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B Eur. Ct. HR, Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A n° 295-A Eur. Ct. HR, Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994 Eur. Ct. HR, Vogt v. Germany, judgment of 20 November 1995 Eur. Ct. HR, Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336 Eur. Ct. HR, Gaygusuz v. Austria, judgment of 16 September 1996 Eur. Ct. HR, Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, judgment of 21 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, p. 184 Eur. Ct. HR, Kalaç v.Turkey (Appl. N° 20704/92), judgment of 1 July 1997, Rep. 1997-IV Eur. Ct. HR, Botta v. Italy judgment of 24 February 1998 Eur. Ct. HR, Petrovic v. Austria, judgment of 27 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 587 Eur. Ct. HR, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (Appl. N° 22774/93), judgment of 28 July 1999, Reports 1999-V Eur. Ct. HR, Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1999 Eur. Ct. HR, Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 31417/96 and 32377/96), judgment of 27 September 1999 Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal (Appl. N° 33290/96), judgment of 21 December 1999, ECHR 1999-IX Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), Mazurek v. France (Appl. N° 34406/97), judgment of 1 February 2000 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Thlimmenos v. Greece (Appl. N° 34369/97), judgment of 6 April 2000 Eur. Ct. HR, Shackell v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 45851/99), decision of 27 April 2000 Eur. Ct. HR, Rotaru v. Romania, judgment of 4 May 2000 Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 35765/97), judgment of 31 July 2000, ECHR 2000-IX Eur. Ct. HR(GC), Chapman v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°27238/95), judgment of 18 January 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Beard v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°24882/94), judgment of 18 January 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Coster v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°24876/94), judgment of 18 January 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Jane Smith v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N°25154/94), judgment of 18 January 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Lee v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 25289/94), judgment of 18 January 2001 Eur. Ct. HR, Dahlab v. Switzerland (Appl. no. 42393/98), judgment of 15 February 2001, ECHR 2001-V Eur. Ct. HR (3d sect.), Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 24746/94), judgment of 4 May 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (GC), Cyprus v.Turkey (Appl. N° 25781/94), judgment of 10 May 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), Mata Estevez v. Spain (Appl. N° 56501/00), dec. of 10 May 2001, Rep. 2001-VI Eur. Ct. HR (3d section), Price v. the United Kingdom judgment of 10 July 2001 (Appl. N° 33394/96) Eur. Ct. HR (3d section), Pichon et Sajous v. France (Appl. n° 49853/99), decision of 2 October 2001 Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), McShane v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 43290/98), judgment of 25 May 2002 56
■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION UNDER EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ■ Eur. Ct. HR, Zehlanova and Zehnal v. the Czech Republic decision of 14 May 2002 (Appl. N° 38621/97) Eur. Ct. HR (1st sect.), dec. of 7 November 2002, Madsen v. Denmark, Appl. n° 58341/00 Eur. Ct. HR (1st sect.), L. and V. v. Austria (Appl. N° 39392/98 and 39829/98), judgment of 9 January 2003 Eur. Ct. HR, S.L. v. Austria (Appl. N° 45330/99), judgment of 9 January 2003 Eur. Ct HR (GC), Sommerfeld v. Germany (Appl. N° 31871/96), judgment of 8 July 2003 Eur. Ct. HR, Sentges v. the Netherlands decision of 8 July 2003 (Appl. N° 27677/02). Eur. Ct. HR (1st sect.), Karner v. Austria (Appl. N°40016/98), judgment of 24 July 2003 Eur. Ct. HR, Koua Poirrez v. France,(Appl. N° 40892/98), judgment of 30 September 2003 Eur. Ct. HR (2nd sect.), Palau-Martinez v. France (Appl. N° 64927/01), judgment of 16 December 2003 Eur. Ct. HR, Haas v. the Netherlands (Appl. N° 36983/97), judgment of 13 January 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (1st sect.), Nachova and Others v. Belgium (Appl. N° 43577/98 and 43579/98), judgment of 26 February 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), dec. of 9 March 2004, Wretlund v. Sweden, Appl. n° 46210/99 Eur. Ct. HR (1st sect.), Connors v. the United Kingdom (Appl. N° 66746/01), judgment of 27 May 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (4th sect.), Leyla Sahin v.Turkey (Appl. N° 44774/98) judgment of 29 June 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (2nd sect.), Balogh v. Hungary (Appl. N° 47940/99), judgment of 20 July 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (2nd sect.), Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania (Appl. N° 55480/00 and 59330/00), judgment of 27 July 2004 Eur. Ct. HR (2nd sect.), Hasan Ilhan v.Turkey (Appl. N° 22494/93), judgment of 9 November 2004 European Commission of Human Rights Eur. Comm. HR, case of East African Asians (Patel et al.), decision of 10 October 1970, Ann. Conv., vol. 13, p. 995 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 7992/77, X v. the United Kingdom, decision of 12 July 1978, D.R. 14, p. 234 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 8239/78, X v. the Netherlands, dec. of 4 December 1978, D.R., 16, p. 184 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 8278/78, X v. Austria, dec. of 13 December 1979, D.R., 18, p. 154 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 8160/78, Ahmad v. the United Kingdom, decision of 12 March 1981, D.R. 22, p. 27 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. no. 16278/90, Karaduman v.Turkey, decision of 3 May 1993, DR 74, p. 93 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. no. 18783/91, Bulut v.Turkey, decision of 3 May 1993 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 21132, Peeters v. the Netherlands, dec. of 6 April 1994, D.R., 77-A, p. 75 Eur. Comm. HR, Appl. n° 20872/92, A.B. v. Switzerland, D.R., 80-A, p. 66 Eur. Comm. HR, Wanda Paruszewska v. Poland (Appl. N° 33770/96), decision (inadmissibility) of 12 April 1998 European Committee of Social Rights Decision of 4 November 2003 in Collective complaint n°13/2002, Autism-Europe v. France Doctrine (in alphabetical order) O. M. Arnadóttir, Equality and non-discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights, Martinus Nijhoff Publ., International studies in human rights n° 74,The Hague, 2003 E. Brems,“De hoofddoek als constitutionele kopzorg”, Tijdschrift voor Bestuurs- en Publiekrecht, 2004, pp. 323-360 E. Bribosia and I. Rorive,“Le voile à l’école: une Europe divisée”, Rev. trim. dr. h., 2004, pp. 951-984 N. Chauvin, Casenote on Leyla Sahin v.Turkey in Revue française de droit administratif, May-June 2003, pp. 536-54 O. De Schutter,“Les examens médicaux à l'embauche de la Commission européenne” (casenote under Case C- 404/92 P,X v.Commission, ECR [1994] 4737 (judgment of 5 October 1994), Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme, 1995, pp. 97-122. O. De Schutter,“ Vie privée et protection de l’individu vis-à-vis des traitements de données à caractère personnel ”, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, n°45, 2001, pp. 137-183. O. De Schutter, Pre-Employment Inquiries and Medical Examinations as Barriers to the Employment of Persons with Disabilities : Reconciling the Principle of Equal Treatment and Health and Safety Regulations under European Union Law, August 2004, 54 pages C. Evans, Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford Univ. Press, 2001 J.-Fr. Flauss,“Discrimination positive et Conventioneuropéenne des droits de l'homme”, in: Pouvoir et liberté. 57 thematic report BIBLIOGRAPHY
Page 1:
Fundamental rights & anti-discrimin
Page 4 and 5:
The contents of this report do not
Page 6 and 7:
Nataly | 1991 thematic report ■ T
Page 8 and 9: thematic report ■ THE PROHIBITION
Page 12 and 13: Piebe | 1970 thematic report ■ TH
Page 18 and 19: ■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATI
Page 24 and 25: Esselien | 1935 thematic report ■
Page 30 and 31: ■ THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATI
Page 36 and 37: Eva | 1980 thematic report ■ THE
Page 48 and 49: Jair | 1993 thematic report ■ THE
Page 56 and 57: Soekradije | 1951 thematic report
Page 64: 04 05 KE-66-05-103-EN-C
show all

The Prohibition of Discrimination under European Human ... - cridho

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?