October 2012 Volume 15 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...

other colleges/universities to avoid concerns based on the limitations of the sample. Second, factors affecting user
behavior are complicated and diverse. There are still other factors affecting intension to use and actual use that have
not been taken into consideration, including user involvement, perceived pleasure, etc., and further analysis and
study is recommended. Third, other models, such as the innovation diffusion model could be included to enhance
explanatory capacity and raise the comprehensiveness of the study.
References
Amoroso, D. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1991). Testing a causal model of end-user application effectiveness. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 8(1), 63-89.
Attwell, G. (2007). E-Portfolios—the DNA of the personal learning environment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society,
3(2), 39-61.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). New York, NY:
Academic Press.
Beyah, G., Xu, P., Woo, H., Mohan, K., & Straub, D. (2003, August). Development of an instrument to study the use of
recommendation systems. Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Conference on Information System, Tampa, FL, USA.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services: The case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Transactions on Systems,
Man, and Cybernetics, Part A:Systems and Humans, 30(4), 411-420.
Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., Yueh, H. P., & Lin, W. C. (2011). Consideration factors and adoption of type, tabulation and
framework for creating e-portfolios. Computers & Education, 56(2), 452–465.
Compeau, D., Gravill, J., Haggerty, N., & Kelley, H. (2006). Computer self-efficacy: A review. In P. Zhang & D. F. Galletta
(Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations (pp. 225-261). Armonk, NY: M. E.
Sharpe Inc. Press.
Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A
longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results.
Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management Press.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical
models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision
Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems
Research, 3(1), 60-95.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update.
Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Doll, W. J., Deng, X. D., Raghunathan, T. S., Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. D. (2004). The meaning and measurement of user
satisfaction: A multi group invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 21(1), 227–262.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to research and theory. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley Press.
Hsu, C. L., & Lin, C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge
sharing motivation. Information and Management, 45(1), 65–74.
Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information
and Management, 29(5), 227-238.
Jennex, M. E., & Olfman, L. (2006). A model of knowledge management success. International Journal of Knowledge
Management, 2(3), 51–68.
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information and
Management, 35(4), 237-250.
124