Mercury Strategy for the Bay-Delta Ecosystem - CALFED Bay-Delta ...
Mercury Strategy for the Bay-Delta Ecosystem - CALFED Bay-Delta ...
Mercury Strategy for the Bay-Delta Ecosystem - CALFED Bay-Delta ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
The modern San Francisco <strong>Bay</strong> can be characterized as an ecologically young, but extensively<br />
modified, estuarine ecosystem. The estuary was <strong>for</strong>med 15,000 to 18,000 years ago, when rising<br />
sea waters from glacial melting entered <strong>the</strong> Golden Gate, inundating what are now <strong>the</strong> major<br />
embayments of <strong>the</strong> San Francisco <strong>Bay</strong> (San Pablo <strong>Bay</strong>, Carquinez Strait, Suisan <strong>Bay</strong>, Grizzly<br />
<strong>Bay</strong>, Honker <strong>Bay</strong>), trans<strong>for</strong>ming a riverine system into an extensive and complex estuary<br />
(Atwater 1979). Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Sacramento-San Joaquin <strong>Delta</strong> and <strong>the</strong> embayments of San<br />
Francisco <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> largest estuary on <strong>the</strong> West Coast of <strong>the</strong> United States, with a combined<br />
area of about 3000 square kilometers. The <strong>Delta</strong> is estuarine through its lower end, but is almost<br />
completely influenced by tidal cycles. About 72 percent of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> land area is in agricultural<br />
production, which was engineered via a complex system of dikes, drainage ditches, irrigation<br />
diversions, pumps, and floodgates. This complex drainage pattern combined with a strong tidal<br />
currents create large tidal excursions, where distinct water parcels, with distinct chemical<br />
characteristics, can travel many miles on a given ebb or flood tide in patterns that are difficult to<br />
predict or anticipate. Freshwater inflows (excluding precipitation) to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> are mainly from<br />
<strong>the</strong> Sacramento River (about 75-80 percent), with most of this inflow during January to April.<br />
Mining and <strong>Mercury</strong><br />
The mountain ranges that surround Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Central Valley and drain into <strong>the</strong> Sacramento<br />
and San Joaquin watersheds contain extensive mineral deposits. Discovery of gold deposits in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Klamath Mountains and Sierra Nevada stimulated <strong>the</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Gold Rush in 1848, and an<br />
abundance of mercury – mined from deposits in <strong>the</strong> Coast Ranges – facilitated <strong>the</strong> rapid historic<br />
proliferation of gold-mining operations (Figure 2) that used <strong>the</strong> mercury-amalgamation process<br />
to extract gold (Alpers and Hunerlach 2000). Hundreds of hydraulic gold-placer mines operated<br />
on <strong>the</strong> east side of <strong>the</strong> Central Valley, where tens of millions of cubic meters of rock and earth<br />
were excavated annually by hydraulic mining. The resulting mining debris choked streams and<br />
rivers downstream of mining sites, and in some cases valleys were nearly filled with debris.<br />
About 100,000 metric tons of mercury were produced by mercury-mining operations in <strong>the</strong> Coast<br />
Ranges, and about 12,000 metric tons of this were used in gold mining in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, with annual<br />
losses at mine sites ranging from about 10 to 30 percent of <strong>the</strong> mercury used (Alpers and<br />
Hunerlach 2000). The effects of <strong>the</strong>se mining activities are evident in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>-<strong>Delta</strong> estuary far<br />
downstream (Conomos et al. 1985). Consequently, mercury from a mineral belt associated with<br />
Cenozoic hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal deposits in <strong>the</strong> Coast Ranges (Rytuba 1996) now contaminates<br />
environments extending from San Francisco <strong>Bay</strong> (Hornberger et al. 1999) to <strong>the</strong> Sierra Nevada<br />
and far beyond (Schuster et al. 2002).<br />
The accumulation of contaminated debris from gold mining caused a notable loss of depth in<br />
parts of <strong>the</strong> San Francisco <strong>Bay</strong> (Nichols et al. 1986, Cappiella et al. 1999). In <strong>the</strong> past 50 years,<br />
however, <strong>the</strong> amount of additional sedimentation attributable to <strong>the</strong> Gold Rush has declined<br />
substantially, and fur<strong>the</strong>r declines are predicted (Jaffee et al. 1998). All of <strong>the</strong> major rivers in <strong>the</strong><br />
Sacramento River basin (Sacramento, Fea<strong>the</strong>r, American, Yuba) are impounded. The<br />
impoundments have decreased sediment export from <strong>the</strong> basin (Goals Project 1999), and <strong>the</strong><br />
suspended sediment load of <strong>the</strong> Sacramento River has declined since 1960 (Krone 1996). Given<br />
that about 90 percent of <strong>the</strong> total mercury load to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>-<strong>Delta</strong> ecosystem from <strong>the</strong> Sacramento<br />
River is sediment borne (Foe 2002), it can be reasonably inferred that mercury loads have<br />
correspondingly declined and that future activities affecting sediment budgets could substantially<br />
4