26.07.2013 Views

Delivering HealthSmart Report - VAGO

Delivering HealthSmart Report - VAGO

Delivering HealthSmart Report - VAGO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive summary<br />

Budget revision means greater subsidy by DHS<br />

DHS did not have a reliable basis for estimating ‘whole of life’ costs arising from the<br />

program, or for defining agency contributions.<br />

It also did not seek to identify whether agencies were able to meet their anticipated<br />

contributions.<br />

This means that DHS was in a position neither to accurately estimate the total cost of<br />

ownership of HealthSMART systems and infrastructure, nor to estimate what level of<br />

contribution should, or could, be made by health agencies.<br />

Revisions to the program budget were made in June 2006, resulting in DHS<br />

contributing an additional $35 million. This DHS cost escalation was made in<br />

recognition of the inability of agencies to meet the original DHS expectations of cocontributions.<br />

No source of sustainable ICT investment for health agencies<br />

The ability to plan and accommodate HealthSMART costs is dependent on the viability<br />

of individual health agencies. While some agencies have sufficient reserves to pay for<br />

their share of implementation expenses and ongoing costs, others have struggled.<br />

Adequate funding of ICT infrastructure within health agencies is an ongoing challenge<br />

within the sector, as ICT competes for funds with general medical equipment, which is<br />

given priority due to its clinical ‘patient facing’ usage.<br />

If the past patterns of ICT underinvestment continue, some agencies will not be able to<br />

keep their infrastructure up to date and are at risk of not fully benefiting from the<br />

investments made through the HealthSMART program.<br />

Delays mean greater subsidy of shared services<br />

Delays in implementation of applications will mean that the HealthSMART shared<br />

services arrangement will have to be subsidised by an extra $61 million until enough<br />

agencies have implemented HealthSMART applications.<br />

This could divert significant funds from DHS service delivery budgets and lead to<br />

underutilisation of a strategic whole-of-sector ICT asset.<br />

Recommendations<br />

• DTF and DHS should work with the VPHS implementing agencies to develop<br />

an evidence-based business case, in line with current better practice<br />

guidance, to better assure the effective delivery of the incomplete components<br />

of the HealthSMART program.<br />

6 <strong>Delivering</strong> HealthSMART — Victoria's whole-of-health ICT strategy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!