27.07.2013 Views

PhD Thesis (PDF) - Department of Astronomy - University of Virginia

PhD Thesis (PDF) - Department of Astronomy - University of Virginia

PhD Thesis (PDF) - Department of Astronomy - University of Virginia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 5.17.— Percentage <strong>of</strong> Analysis Sample sources that appear variable (at the<br />

> 2σ level) between two observations against the time period between the observations.<br />

Note that the error bars are not independent as the pairs contain the same<br />

five observations. The dotted horizontal line represents the percentage <strong>of</strong> sources<br />

that would appear variable just due to statistical fluctuations. Although there is a<br />

rough tendency for more variable sources on longer timescales, a constant variability<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> 11.3% is statistically consistent with the data. Although very s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

sources may be misidentified as variable sources at the four longest timescales due to<br />

improper correction <strong>of</strong> QE degradation, this effect is well within the displayed errors.<br />

variability over the entire period <strong>of</strong> five observations. We refer to these sources as<br />

Long-Term Luminosity Variables (LTLVs), and the probability PL,All that the vari-<br />

ability arises from statistical fluctuations is given in column 12 <strong>of</strong> Table 5.11. The χ 2 ,<br />

when compared to a single merged luminosity and combined with the appropriate de-<br />

grees <strong>of</strong> freedom (one less than the number <strong>of</strong> observations a source is in the FOV), is<br />

211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!