Scope of Work - ARTC Extranet

1. Background
ARTC Risk Assessment - Context Setting
CONTEXT SETTING
To obtain waver to the standards to install cable route within 2.5m from rails edge
2. Risk Statement
To assess the safety/operational risks associated with the construction of cable route
3. Risk Assessment Objectives
Identify controls to reduce the risk
4. Critical Success Factors of the activity/proposal being assessed
deliver to specifications- waver required
5. Scope (inclusions and exclusions)
The alternate cable route will be constructed on the down CESS between 106.1 and 106.0
Locations for ARTC’s signalling/communications and RailCorp’s fibre optic. The cable route will
be a combined route with separation provided through separate pits for each service.
6. Stakeholders
ARTC, RailCorp,
7. Stakeholder consultation
Meetings with ARTC and informed Bob Van Leeuwen from ARTC of the proposed work. Bob has
a copy of the scope
8. Assumptions
9. Constraints
Technical
10. Boundaries/interfaces
Geographical Boundries
11. Qualifications/conditions
A combined cablle rout installation bt directional underbore installed 2.5m from rail edge at a
depth of 2.5m
12. Reference documentation and standards
ESC-11-01
13. Other clarifying commentary
All cable pits will be outside 3m from rail
Copy of Copy of ARTC SFAIRP Risk Assessment Template V2 0 (2)

1.0
Risk
No.
1
RISK ASSESSMENT TITLE and DATE
1.01
Element or
Category
(column
may be
"hidden"
1. RISK IDENTIFICATION
1.1
Hazard or
scenario or
circumstance
Striking existing
ARTC and
RailCorp cables
1.2
Caused by
Installing cable
route in the
vacinity of
existing services
1.3
Leading to an Outcome
Most Likely
(Credible)
Outcome
cable strike/
failure of
signalling
equipment
and
communicati
ons
Worst Case
(Credible)
Outcome
SPAD/ major
delays,
wrong side
failure
2.0
Existing Control
ARTC standards- directional
underbore not to be installed
within 4m from rail edge
without approval and must be
at a depth of 1.6m (standards
state- min cover of 600mm In
water course, installed 500mm
below or within existing
services, cables buried in
track formation shall be a min
1600mm below rail level, min
distance from rail edge shall
not be less than 4m unless
agreed)
3.0
Proposed Additional Control
gain approval to combine
cable routes due to minimal
room and install cable route
2.5m from rail edge at a depth
of 2.5m
2.01
Control type
Engineering/
Design
Engineering/
Design
Elimination
Administrative
3.1
BENEFIT
2. ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
2.1
Responsible Party / Comments
Due to services in the area and the RTA bridge work the existing
services need to be relocated, it is prefered in standards to
maintain cabel route 4m from rail edge, this however is in the
direct path of the bridge works and other services, gaining a waver
to install cable route within 2.5m from rail edge would minimise
chance of striking existing services
3. PROPOSED ADDITIONAL RISK TREATMENT
3.01
Control type
3.2
COST
SFAIRP TEST
3.3
Decision
3.4
Responsible
Party
High Minimal Adopt RTA
3.5
By when
2.2
Current
consequence
Major
2.3
Current
likelihood
2.4
Current risk
level
Possible H
4. RESCORE TO REFLECT SFAIRP
OUTCOMES
4.0
Revised
consequence
Not
Significant
4.1
Revised
likelihood
Unlikely
4.2
Revised risk
level
L
5. VALIDATION AND CLARIFICATION
5.0
Has this
workshop
adequately
addressed this
risk?
5.1
Do the
decisions make
sense?
5.2
Comments / clarification
Pg 2 of 5 Copy of Copy of ARTC SFAIRP Risk Assessment Template V2 0 (2)

Is expected to occur in most
circumstances
Will probably occur in most
circumstances
OPERATIONAL
Once per month Almost Certain
Between once a month and
once a year
Might occur at some time Between once a year and
once in five years
Could occur at some time Between once in 5 years and
once in 20 years
May occur in exceptional
circumstances
Likelihood
< 6 hours track
closure
FINANCIAL < $250,000
SAFETY No medical control
Likely
Possible
Unlikely
Once in more than 20 years Rare
Consequence
> 6 hours track
> 24 hours but les
closure but less
than 48 hours track
than 24 hours track
closure
closure
> $250,000 but
less than
$2,000,000
Lost time injury
occurs or medical
control required
>$2M but less than
$10M
Serious injury
occurs
> 2 days but less
than 5 days track
closure
> $10M but less
than $50M
Single fatality
occurs
> 5 days track
closure
> $50M
Multiple but
localised fatalities
occur
Not Significant Minor Moderate Major Extreme
1 2 3 4 5
5 M M H VH VH
4 L M H VH VH
3 L L M H H
2 L L L M M
1 L L L L M
Copy of Copy of ARTC SFAIRP Risk Assessment Template V2 0 (2)

Copy of Copy of ARTC SFAIRP Risk Assessment Template V2 0 (2)

Notes:
1. This matrix is designed as a guide only and should not be implemented without sufficient analysis and debate about
proposed controls.
2. The decision to reject any control must be justified and the decision documented.
3. The recommendation to "investigate" a control indicates that further analysis into the costs and benefits is required.
This analysis may be conducted by the workshop participants, or may require further investigation outside of the
workshop environment.
Copy of Copy of ARTC SFAIRP Risk Assessment Template V2 0 (2)

Scope of Works
1
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling works
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling
Works
Introduction....................................................................................................................2
Personnel........................................................................................................................2
Accreditations and Qualifications..................................................................................2
Site Safety ......................................................................................................................2
Standards........................................................................................................................2
Documentation...............................................................................................................2
Responsibilities..............................................................................................................3
Concept ..........................................................................................................................3
Scope of Work ...............................................................................................................3
Design .........................................................................................................................4
Installation...................................................................................................................4
Test and commission...................................................................................................4
Assumptions...................................................................................................................5

2
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling works
Introduction
The purpose of this document is to detail the scope of works required for the design,
installation, testing and commissioning of the affected cable routes. Enabling works
are required to facilitate in the RTA’s Shortland to Sandgate bypass.
Personnel
All persons working on site must be included in the Licence agreement issued by
ARTC and must be inducted by the RTA
Accreditations and Qualifications
All persons including subcontractors working on site shall have current accreditation
for working in the rail corridor. This is in addition to any other specific accreditation
to perform specialised task.
Minium requirements:
• OHS Construction Industry Induction
• Rail Industry Safety Induction
• ARTC Induction
• RTA Induction
Site Safety
The awarded contractor will provide an approved site Safety Management Plan
(SMP) to the RTA for inclusion to the Project Specific Plan (PSP).
Standards
ARTC standards are to be utilised for the signalling & communications route, while
RailCorp’s standards followed for their optic fibre route.
Documentation
The following documentation must be obtained from ARTC.
• ARTC Licence agreement
• CB363
• Sandgate Signalling Plan
As there are no design changes and time constraints ARTC has agreed to offer
information only copy of circuits for testing and commissioning.

3
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling works
Responsibilities
The awarded contractor will be responsible for the following:
• Organise the ARTC Licence Agreement
• Request for drawings
• Provide safe working protection
• Locate an pothole existing services
• Update existing project bid sheet
• Attend possession meetings
• Delivery of detailed design / DSS for the project
• Procurement of all necessary materials
• Terminate and testing of cable route and all affected circuits
• Completion of installation, testing and commissioning works, including final
handover to the client
• Delivery of final As-Built documentation
Concept
To provide an alternate signalling and fibre optic route for the Shortland to Sandgate
bridge project. The ARTC and RailCorp routes must have separation as per standards.
Scope of Work
The alternate cable route will be constructed on the down CESS between 106.1 and
106.0 Locations for ARTC’s signalling/communications and RailCorp’s fibre optic.
The cable route will be a combined route with separation provided through separate
pits for each service.
The length of work will be approx 320m with the directional bore being around 290m
in length from 170.800km to 170.530km. Two cable pits (1 x ARTC & 1 x RailCorp)
will be installed inside the rail boundary South of 160.1 location over the existing
route, the directional bore will start at this point and finish at the existing cable pits
located on the down at 170.530km.
The cable route will be installed 2.5m from the rail edge at a depth of 2.5m.
Some existing cable route will be reused this will be at 160.0 Location’s ULX and
160.1 Location to the New pits.
The ARTC communications cables and optic fibre diversity link can be cut over
before the shutdown, testing of the diversity link will be required beforehand.
Signalling and power cables will be cut over tested and commissioned on the
February shutdown.
RailCorp will be responsible for the joining and testing of their cable, the alternate
route will be roped and trace wire installed.
ARTC Cables required:
• 2c 16mm 2 twin (RD/BK)
• 50c (CABLE A) 07/050
• 2 x 18c Multimode Fibre Optic
• 10pr communications 0.9mm 2
• 30pr communications 0.9mm 2

RailCorp Cables required
• 1 x 96c Single mode Fibre Optic
4
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling works
The ARTC optic fibre and 30 pair communication cables will require joining as they
do not terminate in 106.0 location, all other cables are to be completely rerun and
terminated in (106.0 and 106.1) locations to minimise potential failure points from
unnecessary joints.
Design
A detailed site survey shall be produced showing both existing services and cable
routes with the inclusion of proposed new routes. These DSS drawings shall be
submitted for approval prior to any cable route installation work commencing. Once
commissioned, as built DSS’s should be submitted with commissioning work
package.
Installation
Approval has been given by ARTC to install the combined (ARTC & RailCorp) cable
route 2.5m from rail edge and maintaining a depth of 2.5m to avoid existing route, the
required bore length is approximately 290m.
Two cable pits (Costello type with lockable lids) will be installed over the existing
cable route, positioned inside the rail boundary fence near 170.800km, the cable route
will be reused from this point to 106.1 Location, The ULX and pits at 170.530km will
also be reused.
Test and commission
The commissioning is to be held over two days, starting 0300 on 28 th February 2011
to 0300 on 1 st March 2011 Allowing 24Hrs to cut over test and commission 1 x 50c
Signalling cable and 2 x 16 2 mm 120v mains.
Testing of the diversity link is required before hand allowing the ability to cut over
ARTC’s communication and fibre optic pre shutdown.
RailCorp will be responsible for their fibre optic cable.
Testing and commissioning activities shall adhere to ARTC and Railcorp
Specifications

5
Shortland to Sandgate Bridge Enabling works
Assumptions
The scope is based on the following assumptions:
• New cable routes will reside inside the Rail boundary and easements created.
• Cables to be replaced between 106.1 and 106.0 Locations (to minimise joint
failure points)
• Cable joints required on 30pr communication cable (0.9mm) and ARTC optic
fibre
• RailCorp fibre optic requires joining
• Railcorp has an easement for the fibre route and new route is permitted to use this
easement
• RailCorp agrees to the combined route
• ULX to 106.0 location has enough capacity to accommodate alternate route for
changeover

NORTH
TRACE VERY POOR UNDER DEEP FILL
UNDERGROUND CABLE TO GOLF RANGE
D
C
B
A
16/12/10
8/12/10
7/12/10
ORIGINAL ISSUE 3/12/10
AMENDMENTS DATE
DRAWN
KDM
SURVEYED BTH
REGISTERED SURVEYOR
DATE 3/12/10
DATE
2/12/10
REGISTERED SURVEYORS AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
SUITE 4, 1 BOUNTY CL., TUGGERAH 2259
P.O. BOX 4144, BAY VILLAGE. 2261
PHONE (02) 43539644 FAX (02) 43533855
Email ~admin@surveyors.com.au
LOCALITY :
CLIENT :
PROJECT :
LEGEND
SHORTLAND TO
SANDGATE
L.G.A. NEWCASTLE
R.T.A.
ARTC SIGNAL CABLE AND
RAILCORP OPTIC FIBRE, AS IDENTIFIED
BY DOWNER ONSITE& LOCATED BY BHA 2/12/10
UNDERGROUND CALE LOCATED BY OTHERS
RISING MAIN IDENITIFIED BY OTHERS
TOP AND CENTRE OF DOWN RAIL
RAIL CORP FIBRE OPTIC MAIN (REDUNDANT)
DENOTES APPROX. DEPTH OF SERVICE
DENOTES SURVEYED POINT (1/12/10)
DENOTES DATA PROVIDED RTA (GENIO FILE)
TWIN BRIDGES
PLAN :
DATUM
CAD REF:
SERVICE LOCALITY SKETCH
AUSTRALIAN HEIGHT DATUM
3925SHORT
SCALE
SHEET
1:200
5
OF
5