29.07.2013 Views

Staying Competitive in Today's Homebuilding Industry.

Staying Competitive in Today's Homebuilding Industry.

Staying Competitive in Today's Homebuilding Industry.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Respondents<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

New multifamily homes constructed by<br />

respondents demonstrated a similar land-tototal<br />

cost ratio. Starter multifamily properties<br />

averaged 24% of total cost to land. For<br />

“move-up” properties, land costs were 26%<br />

of total costs. For luxury properties, land<br />

accounted for 29% of the total f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

home cost and land for custom-built luxury<br />

homes could reach as much as 50% of the<br />

cost of the f<strong>in</strong>ished home.<br />

When Land Supply is Challenged<br />

When Land Supply is Challenged<br />

Higher<br />

Density<br />

One<br />

Family<br />

Smaller<br />

Lot<br />

Size<br />

Reuse<br />

or<br />

Infill<br />

<strong>Stay<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Competitive</strong> <strong>in</strong> Today’s Homebuild<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Industry</strong><br />

Deloitte and McGraw-Hill Construction • U.S. Homebuilder Survey<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g a hous<strong>in</strong>g boom, builders typically<br />

pass costs associated with land constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

along to their buyers; however, there is<br />

concern that as <strong>in</strong>terest rates rise, buyers<br />

will no longer be able to shoulder this<br />

burden. In survey<strong>in</strong>g our respondents about<br />

the limitations on land supply, the majority<br />

suggest that build<strong>in</strong>g larger homes can<br />

compensate for a decrease <strong>in</strong> land availability.<br />

Build<strong>in</strong>g higher density one-family homes or<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g smaller lots were the two most popular<br />

alternatives to tight supply, followed by reuse<br />

or <strong>in</strong>fill.<br />

Higher<br />

Density<br />

Attached<br />

Alter<br />

Geo<br />

Focus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!