- Page 1: INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscrip
- Page 4 and 5: UMI Number: 3053915 Copyright 2002
- Page 6 and 7: STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertati
- Page 10 and 11: ABSTRACT Choosing where offspring w
- Page 12 and 13: An explanation of tiie problem CHAP
- Page 14 and 15: euse occurs in the field, the impac
- Page 16 and 17: Appendix D, "Aggregative behavior i
- Page 18 and 19: offspring performance. Counter to t
- Page 20 and 21: Lalonde RG, Mangel M, 1994. Seasona
- Page 22 and 23: APPENDIX A HOST MARKING BEHAVIOR IN
- Page 24 and 25: kluwer the language of science Dr.
- Page 26 and 27: 174 belter categorized as cues than
- Page 28 and 29: fubfe 2. Kinds ot cvicknce used lo
- Page 30 and 31: 278 defend themselves and because i
- Page 32 and 33: 280 lion of a signal. Costs associa
- Page 34 and 35: 282 than were conspccifics with low
- Page 36 and 37: 284 thai (he marker was a mutant fo
- Page 38 and 39: 286 dropping on ihe MP communicatio
- Page 40 and 41: 28S inac>. 3 larval partsiloiil of
- Page 42 and 43: 290 Hol'svang. T. 1988. Mechanisms
- Page 44 and 45: 29Z Roitbcfg. B- D it R- G- Laionde
- Page 46 and 47: APPENDIX B HOST UTILIZATION BY THE
- Page 48 and 49: Dispersal by Larvae of the Stem Bor
- Page 50 and 51: POPULATION ECOUXTY Host Utilization
- Page 52 and 53: October 2000 NUFIO ET AL.; HOST UTI
- Page 54 and 55: October 2000 Nufio et au: Hoct Unuz
- Page 56 and 57: October 2000 NUFIO ET AL4 HOST UIHI
- Page 58 and 59:
Reuse of larval hosts by the walnut
- Page 60 and 61:
KEYWORDS Life history" marking pher
- Page 62 and 63:
Alternatively, a weak correlation b
- Page 64 and 65:
previously attacked hosts early in
- Page 66 and 67:
walnut fly oviposition punctures. T
- Page 68 and 69:
Effects of offspring weight on adul
- Page 70 and 71:
she deposited over a lifetime and t
- Page 72 and 73:
RESULTS Levels of host reuse in the
- Page 74 and 75:
Survival from egg to egg hatch Of t
- Page 76 and 77:
significantly correlated with pupal
- Page 78 and 79:
DISCUSSION While the femaie-prefere
- Page 80 and 81:
discriminate between hosts that hav
- Page 82 and 83:
will consume fewer resources and th
- Page 84 and 85:
females gain not by simply reusing
- Page 86 and 87:
of her offspring but also of the nu
- Page 88 and 89:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Henar Alo
- Page 90 and 91:
Bjorkman C, Larsson S, Bommarco R,
- Page 92 and 93:
Fujiyama N, Katakura H, 2001. Varia
- Page 94 and 95:
Mayhew PJ, 1997. Adaptive patterns
- Page 96 and 97:
Robertson IC, Roitberg BD, 1998. Du
- Page 98 and 99:
Wiklund C, 1981. Generalist vs. spe
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 2. The influence of various f
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 4. Analysis of variance compa
- Page 104 and 105:
nCURE CAPTIONS - Continued Figure 5
- Page 106 and 107:
Figure 1. Fruit Cohorts (Number of
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 3. A. B. A > on •m e « 50
- Page 110 and 111:
Figure 5. B. es & 1 1 0.8 • 0.6 -
- Page 112 and 113:
Figure 7. B. > 09 "S s e s o •Ml
- Page 114 and 115:
Figure 9. 400 9t W s 1 t 300 « Of)
- Page 116 and 117:
Aggregative behavior is not explain
- Page 118 and 119:
that the larval aggregations that f
- Page 120 and 121:
2001). The shifting benefits and co
- Page 122 and 123:
spatial patterning of clutches depo
- Page 124 and 125:
16-fl oz (473-ml) plastic Solo cups
- Page 126 and 127:
percentage of hatchlings that emerg
- Page 128 and 129:
previously created oviposition punc
- Page 130 and 131:
RESULTS Experiment 1. Effect of off
- Page 132 and 133:
deposited) again improved the model
- Page 134 and 135:
median pupal weight in the lone two
- Page 136 and 137:
survival, using two-clutch and thre
- Page 138 and 139:
DISCUSSION Absence of an AUee efTec
- Page 140 and 141:
simultaneously. It would seem that
- Page 142 and 143:
Spatial distribution of clutches In
- Page 144 and 145:
If reuse of larval hosts negatively
- Page 146 and 147:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Henar Alo
- Page 148 and 149:
Hausmann SM, Miller JR, 1989. Ovipo
- Page 150 and 151:
Papaj DR, Alonso-Pimentel H, 1997.
- Page 152 and 153:
Table 1. The influence of various f
- Page 154 and 155:
Table 3. The influence of various f
- Page 156 and 157:
FIGURE CAPTIONS continued Figure 4.
- Page 158 and 159:
Figure 2 MD E DC n Om 3 Qi S V DA E
- Page 160 and 161:
Figure 4. B. c. -g 60 S a. a 40 - S
- Page 162 and 163:
Host marking beiiavior as a quantit
- Page 164 and 165:
encountered either control fruit th
- Page 166 and 167:
unparasitized and parasitized hosts
- Page 168 and 169:
Finally, it is conceivable that the
- Page 170 and 171:
Experiment 1. Relationship between
- Page 172 and 173:
or 30 minutes). Fruit were then hun
- Page 174 and 175:
After two replicates of the four tr
- Page 176 and 177:
Experiment 3. Female responses to h
- Page 178 and 179:
RESULTS Experiment 1. Effects of cl
- Page 180 and 181:
Experiment 3. Female responses to f
- Page 182 and 183:
example, the possibility that ovipo
- Page 184 and 185:
field cage assays. What remains to
- Page 186 and 187:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Henar Alo
- Page 188 and 189:
Bauer G, 1986. Life-history strateg
- Page 190 and 191:
Landolt PJ, Averill AL, 1999. Fruit
- Page 192 and 193:
Quiring DT, McNeil JN, 1984. Intras
- Page 194 and 195:
FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. The relat
- Page 196 and 197:
Figure 2. w OA 8 k 98 s o a. QH s 8