View Original - Middle East Technical University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SPSS Output 11 Cross tabulation of application consideration with the emphasis on contract management behavior for private projects Application Consideration 118 the emphasis on contract management behavior for private projects Total 3 4 5 Continuous Application 5 12 12 29 Protective Application 1 0 5 6 Total 6 12 17 35 SPSS Output 12 Gamma value for Cross tabulation of application consideration with the emphasis on contract management behavior for private projects Asymp. Std. Approx. Value Error(a) T(b) Approx. Sig. Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma .560 .383 1.390 .164 N of Valid Cases 35 The contract type The contract type also thought to be a potential factor which influences contract management behavior. The choice of contract type is one of the most important decisions in any contract strategy because it governs three vital success factors which are; the method of payment for the contractor, the risk allocation between the parties, and its ability to motivate the contractor (Zaghloul, 2005). As smith (2003) states fixed price contracts like, lump sum and unit price contracts, allocate more risk to the contractor, where cost reimbursable contracts provide greater risk sharing between the parties. The participants were asked to rate the impact of contract types on their contract management behavior in order to reveal whether this different risk sharing of different payment methods has an influence on their behavior.
Graphh 22 The immpact of contract type e on contract managemment behav vior Graph 222 presents that 11 of responden nts rate the impact oof contract type as important and 14 ass very impportant. The ese responndents, togeether with varying risks alllocation oof paymennt method ds, pointeed varying docume entation requirements for prreparation of paymen nt certificates in differrent contra act types to justifyy their chaanging behhavior. The e cross taabulations respondents thosee support companiees applyingg protectivve contract managemment or cllaim mana agement have subbstantial annd moderaate relatio ons respectively withh the incr rease in behavior 114 112 110 8 6 4 2 0 12 5 protective contracct manageement and d those modifications. This is related with w the deefensive naature of protective applicatioon. SPSS ouutputs 13. 114, 15, and 16 illustrattes these reelations. 9 119 9 11 14 exposed that t the
Page 1 and 2:
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOR OF TUR
Page 3 and 4:
I hereby declare that all informati
Page 5 and 6:
A survey was composed and interview
Page 7 and 8:
Türk yüklenicilerin sözleşme y
Page 9 and 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to th
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........
Page 13 and 14:
TABLES LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Gamma
Page 15 and 16:
Table 37 Cross tabulations for proj
Page 17 and 18:
Graph 3 Total numbers of Turkish co
Page 19 and 20:
SPSS Output 12 Gamma value for Cros
Page 21 and 22:
Graph 35 Frequency of claim causes
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION “There was
Page 25 and 26:
elationship of all parties to a pro
Page 27 and 28:
this as given by Read et al. (2004)
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 1 The Emergence of Contract
Page 31 and 32:
At the third chapter contract manag
Page 33 and 34:
many of the professionals do not un
Page 35 and 36:
ut only the first of many. No matte
Page 37 and 38:
charged to concept of contract mana
Page 39 and 40:
uilding trades people (Krone, 1991)
Page 41 and 42:
1985; Dirks, 2000) and improve coor
Page 43 and 44:
provision may lead to more than one
Page 45 and 46:
aspirations, cultural background or
Page 47 and 48:
hand conflict parties are in a tran
Page 49 and 50:
2005). Figure 4 illustrates conflic
Page 51 and 52:
methods currently commonly used in
Page 53 and 54:
a legal duty (cited in Ng et al., 2
Page 55 and 56:
Dispute review boards are non‐bin
Page 57 and 58:
Grutters (2007) perceives as the ul
Page 59 and 60:
It is contractor’s duty to make s
Page 61 and 62:
or the probability of occurrence of
Page 63 and 64:
One way in which the contracting pa
Page 65 and 66:
Wang and Chou (2003), to make risk
Page 67 and 68:
Hao et al., 2008) especially in the
Page 69 and 70:
Figure 8 Types of Changes (smith, 2
Page 71 and 72:
date that the parties agreed upon f
Page 73 and 74:
Unless the contract provides to the
Page 75 and 76:
oral contracts are valid agreements
Page 77 and 78:
Engineering contracts share many fe
Page 79 and 80:
cited in Ilgar, 2005; Semple et al.
Page 81 and 82:
“Each party to the contract is aw
Page 83 and 84:
claim process. Thus, an awareness o
Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 3 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IN TU
Page 87 and 88:
The story for this almost continuou
Page 89 and 90: executed by less than 0,1% of contr
Page 91 and 92: Knowing that his points on bureaucr
Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY It is given i
Page 95 and 96: order to achieve the success for th
Page 97 and 98: to rate impact of contract manageme
Page 99 and 100: participators of pilot interviews s
Page 101 and 102: The third section of the questionna
Page 103 and 104: this question previous studies that
Page 105 and 106: professionals notedd that faceto fa
Page 107 and 108: ecause its headquarter is not in Tu
Page 109 and 110: 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Graph 4 Numbers
Page 111 and 112: 4.3. Data Analysis After the 4 mont
Page 113 and 114: Table 2 Indexing calculations Weigh
Page 115 and 116: 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0‐ ‐10
Page 117 and 118: with a gamma valuee of 0.462 aas gi
Page 119 and 120: Graph 12 The weighht given to aadmi
Page 121 and 122: ehaviors of individuals is characte
Page 123 and 124: elation with a gamma value of 0.850
Page 125 and 126: 5.1.1. Factors Effecting Behavior T
Page 127 and 128: Graph 16 The imppact of Projject du
Page 129 and 130: due to sstrict or lloose enfoorceme
Page 131 and 132: Afghanistan and Iraq, which are sub
Page 133 and 134: Table 5 Country index for the Compa
Page 135 and 136: Table 6 Cross tabulations of the im
Page 137 and 138: In previous sections of the study,
Page 139: Moreover, participants, who arrange
Page 143 and 144: SPSS Outtput 16 Gammma value for cr
Page 145 and 146: When several cross tabulations run
Page 147 and 148: Table 9 Companies’ emphassis on c
Page 149 and 150: “When compared, which ones of the
Page 151 and 152: 5.1.2. Key Factors for Success This
Page 153 and 154: Several cross tabulations were run
Page 155 and 156: perspectives of the project at diff
Page 157 and 158: Several relations reevealed by the
Page 159 and 160: Table 20 Cross tabulations for pre
Page 161 and 162: major factor to reduce project risk
Page 163 and 164: per clause basis. As it is a functi
Page 165 and 166: Table 25 Indexes for regular contra
Page 167 and 168: administration, which is at the hea
Page 169 and 170: 5.1.2.4. Claim Process The goal of
Page 171 and 172: The strong and substantial relation
Page 173 and 174: 5.1.2.5. Dispute Process The disput
Page 175 and 176: contractors. As previously stated t
Page 177 and 178: with addiitional conttract managgem
Page 179 and 180: Another important issue about appoi
Page 181 and 182: Figure 12 represents indexes of cor
Page 183 and 184: share information with parties cond
Page 185 and 186: Figure 14 Sample Anova output for c
Page 187 and 188: Figure 15 Matrixes at corporate lev
Page 189 and 190: 5.3. Claim Issues This section of t
Page 191 and 192:
Addministrative Failure of Owners P
Page 193 and 194:
It can be viewed from Table 38 abov
Page 195 and 196:
elations that could not be commente
Page 197 and 198:
Table 40 Cross tabulations of confl
Page 199 and 200:
Table 41 Cross tabulations of occur
Page 201 and 202:
project sites. It was mentioned in
Page 203 and 204:
Graph 377 Impact off contract mmana
Page 205 and 206:
applied oother methods, noteed that
Page 207 and 208:
Table 46 Success in arbitratioons,
Page 209 and 210:
SPSS Output 25 Cross tabulation bet
Page 211 and 212:
progress they feel more comfortable
Page 213 and 214:
contract and at project level after
Page 215 and 216:
easons. However through literature
Page 217 and 218:
management, the project delivery, a
Page 219 and 220:
conduct contract management functio
Page 221 and 222:
• There are several studies focus
Page 223 and 224:
REFERENCES Abdul‐Malak, M. A. U.,
Page 225 and 226:
Ashworth, A. (2006). Contractual Pr
Page 227 and 228:
Specification for Public Works Cont
Page 229 and 230:
Claim Process Framework. Journal of
Page 231 and 232:
Easton, G. R. (1989). Construction
Page 233 and 234:
Gurdamar, S. (1980). An investigati
Page 235 and 236:
in Zaghloul, R., & Hartman, F. (200
Page 237 and 238:
Transactions On Engineering Managem
Page 239 and 240:
Mitropoulos, P., & Howell, G. (2001
Page 241 and 242:
Perry, G., & Hayes, W. (1985). Risk
Page 243 and 244:
Simplified Approach. M.Sc. Thesis,
Page 245 and 246:
Clauses On Contractor Bid Price. Ph
Page 247 and 248:
Winch, G. M. (2002). Managing const
Page 249 and 250:
APPENDIX A QUESTIONNAIRE This appen
Page 251 and 252:
229
Page 253 and 254:
231
Page 255 and 256:
233
Page 257 and 258:
235
Page 259 and 260:
237
show all

View Original - Middle East Technical University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?