- Page 1 and 2: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOR OF TUR
- Page 3 and 4: I hereby declare that all informati
- Page 5 and 6: A survey was composed and interview
- Page 7 and 8: Türk yüklenicilerin sözleşme y
- Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to th
- Page 11 and 12: TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........
- Page 13 and 14: TABLES LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Gamma
- Page 15 and 16: Table 37 Cross tabulations for proj
- Page 17 and 18: Graph 3 Total numbers of Turkish co
- Page 19: SPSS Output 12 Gamma value for Cros
- Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION “There was
- Page 25 and 26: elationship of all parties to a pro
- Page 27 and 28: this as given by Read et al. (2004)
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 1 The Emergence of Contract
- Page 31 and 32: At the third chapter contract manag
- Page 33 and 34: many of the professionals do not un
- Page 35 and 36: ut only the first of many. No matte
- Page 37 and 38: charged to concept of contract mana
- Page 39 and 40: uilding trades people (Krone, 1991)
- Page 41 and 42: 1985; Dirks, 2000) and improve coor
- Page 43 and 44: provision may lead to more than one
- Page 45 and 46: aspirations, cultural background or
- Page 47 and 48: hand conflict parties are in a tran
- Page 49 and 50: 2005). Figure 4 illustrates conflic
- Page 51 and 52: methods currently commonly used in
- Page 53 and 54: a legal duty (cited in Ng et al., 2
- Page 55 and 56: Dispute review boards are non‐bin
- Page 57 and 58: Grutters (2007) perceives as the ul
- Page 59 and 60: It is contractor’s duty to make s
- Page 61 and 62: or the probability of occurrence of
- Page 63 and 64: One way in which the contracting pa
- Page 65 and 66: Wang and Chou (2003), to make risk
- Page 67 and 68: Hao et al., 2008) especially in the
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 8 Types of Changes (smith, 2
- Page 71 and 72:
date that the parties agreed upon f
- Page 73 and 74:
Unless the contract provides to the
- Page 75 and 76:
oral contracts are valid agreements
- Page 77 and 78:
Engineering contracts share many fe
- Page 79 and 80:
cited in Ilgar, 2005; Semple et al.
- Page 81 and 82:
“Each party to the contract is aw
- Page 83 and 84:
claim process. Thus, an awareness o
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 3 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IN TU
- Page 87 and 88:
The story for this almost continuou
- Page 89 and 90:
executed by less than 0,1% of contr
- Page 91 and 92:
Knowing that his points on bureaucr
- Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY It is given i
- Page 95 and 96:
order to achieve the success for th
- Page 97 and 98:
to rate impact of contract manageme
- Page 99 and 100:
participators of pilot interviews s
- Page 101 and 102:
The third section of the questionna
- Page 103 and 104:
this question previous studies that
- Page 105 and 106:
professionals notedd that faceto fa
- Page 107 and 108:
ecause its headquarter is not in Tu
- Page 109 and 110:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Graph 4 Numbers
- Page 111 and 112:
4.3. Data Analysis After the 4 mont
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 2 Indexing calculations Weigh
- Page 115 and 116:
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0‐ ‐10
- Page 117 and 118:
with a gamma valuee of 0.462 aas gi
- Page 119 and 120:
Graph 12 The weighht given to aadmi
- Page 121 and 122:
ehaviors of individuals is characte
- Page 123 and 124:
elation with a gamma value of 0.850
- Page 125 and 126:
5.1.1. Factors Effecting Behavior T
- Page 127 and 128:
Graph 16 The imppact of Projject du
- Page 129 and 130:
due to sstrict or lloose enfoorceme
- Page 131 and 132:
Afghanistan and Iraq, which are sub
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 5 Country index for the Compa
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 6 Cross tabulations of the im
- Page 137 and 138:
In previous sections of the study,
- Page 139 and 140:
Moreover, participants, who arrange
- Page 141 and 142:
Graphh 22 The immpact of contract t
- Page 143 and 144:
SPSS Outtput 16 Gammma value for cr
- Page 145 and 146:
When several cross tabulations run
- Page 147 and 148:
Table 9 Companies’ emphassis on c
- Page 149 and 150:
“When compared, which ones of the
- Page 151 and 152:
5.1.2. Key Factors for Success This
- Page 153 and 154:
Several cross tabulations were run
- Page 155 and 156:
perspectives of the project at diff
- Page 157 and 158:
Several relations reevealed by the
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 20 Cross tabulations for pre
- Page 161 and 162:
major factor to reduce project risk
- Page 163 and 164:
per clause basis. As it is a functi
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 25 Indexes for regular contra
- Page 167 and 168:
administration, which is at the hea
- Page 169 and 170:
5.1.2.4. Claim Process The goal of
- Page 171 and 172:
The strong and substantial relation
- Page 173 and 174:
5.1.2.5. Dispute Process The disput
- Page 175 and 176:
contractors. As previously stated t
- Page 177 and 178:
with addiitional conttract managgem
- Page 179 and 180:
Another important issue about appoi
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure 12 represents indexes of cor
- Page 183 and 184:
share information with parties cond
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 14 Sample Anova output for c
- Page 187 and 188:
Figure 15 Matrixes at corporate lev
- Page 189 and 190:
5.3. Claim Issues This section of t
- Page 191 and 192:
Addministrative Failure of Owners P
- Page 193 and 194:
It can be viewed from Table 38 abov
- Page 195 and 196:
elations that could not be commente
- Page 197 and 198:
Table 40 Cross tabulations of confl
- Page 199 and 200:
Table 41 Cross tabulations of occur
- Page 201 and 202:
project sites. It was mentioned in
- Page 203 and 204:
Graph 377 Impact off contract mmana
- Page 205 and 206:
applied oother methods, noteed that
- Page 207 and 208:
Table 46 Success in arbitratioons,
- Page 209 and 210:
SPSS Output 25 Cross tabulation bet
- Page 211 and 212:
progress they feel more comfortable
- Page 213 and 214:
contract and at project level after
- Page 215 and 216:
easons. However through literature
- Page 217 and 218:
management, the project delivery, a
- Page 219 and 220:
conduct contract management functio
- Page 221 and 222:
• There are several studies focus
- Page 223 and 224:
REFERENCES Abdul‐Malak, M. A. U.,
- Page 225 and 226:
Ashworth, A. (2006). Contractual Pr
- Page 227 and 228:
Specification for Public Works Cont
- Page 229 and 230:
Claim Process Framework. Journal of
- Page 231 and 232:
Easton, G. R. (1989). Construction
- Page 233 and 234:
Gurdamar, S. (1980). An investigati
- Page 235 and 236:
in Zaghloul, R., & Hartman, F. (200
- Page 237 and 238:
Transactions On Engineering Managem
- Page 239 and 240:
Mitropoulos, P., & Howell, G. (2001
- Page 241 and 242:
Perry, G., & Hayes, W. (1985). Risk
- Page 243 and 244:
Simplified Approach. M.Sc. Thesis,
- Page 245 and 246:
Clauses On Contractor Bid Price. Ph
- Page 247 and 248:
Winch, G. M. (2002). Managing const
- Page 249 and 250:
APPENDIX A QUESTIONNAIRE This appen
- Page 251 and 252:
229
- Page 253 and 254:
231
- Page 255 and 256:
233
- Page 257 and 258:
235
- Page 259 and 260:
237