Risk Assessment Methodologies of Soil Threats in Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Van Westen, C. J., Van Asch, T.W.J. and Soeters, R. (2006). Landslide hazard and risk zonation – why is still so difficult? Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 65: 167-184 Van-Camp, Lieve; Benilde Bujarrabal; Anna Rita Gentile; Robert J. A. Jones; Luca Montanarella, Claudia Olazabal; Senthil-Kumar Selvaradjou (eds.), 2004. Reports of the technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Volume I Introduction and Executive Summary.. EUR 21319 EN/1 Van-Camp. L., Bujarrabal, B., Gentile, A-R., Jones, R.J.A., Montanarella, L., Olazabal, C. and Selvaradjou, S-K. (2004). Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. EUR 21319 EN/2, 872 pp. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Varnes DJ. 1978. Slope Movement Types and Processes. In Landslides: Analysis and Control, Schuster RL. Varnes, D.J. and the International Association of Engineering Geology Commission on Landslides and Other Mass Movements, 1984, Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice. Natural Hazards, vol.3, Paris, France. UNESCO, 63p. Vegetation ı ein Zeitvergleich nach 27 Jahren. The Impact of Arable and Forest Land Use on Soil and Vegetation. A Comparison after 27 Years. Forstw. Cbl. 122: 81−98 Vellinga, Th.V., Van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A., Kuikman, P.J., 2004. The impact of grassland ploughing on CO2 and N2O emissions in the Netherlands. Nutrient Cycling and Agroecosystems 70, 33 – 45. Verheijen, F., Bellamy, P, Kibblewhite, M. Gaunt, J., 2005. Organic Carbon ranges in arable soils of England and Wales, Soil Use and Management 21: 2-9. Vesterdal, L., Rosenquvist, L., Salm, C. van der, Hansen, K., Groenenberg, B.-J., and Johansson, M.-B., 2007. Carbon sequestration in soil and biomass following afforastation: experiences from oak and norway spruce chronosequences in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. In: G.W. Heil, B. Meys and K. Hansen: Environmental effects of afforestation in North-Western Europe. From Field Obeservations to Decision Support. Sprin, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Vleeshouwers, L.M., Verhagen, A., 2002. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Global Change Biology 8, 519 – 530. Voorhees, W.B., 2000. Long term effects of of subsoil compaction on yield of maize. In: Horn, R., Van den Akker, J.J.H., Arvidsson, J. (Eds.), Subsoil Compaction: Distribution, Processes and Consequences. Advances in GeoEcology 32. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, Germany, pp. 331-338 Vos, B. de, Lettens, S., Muys, B., and Deckers, J.A., 2007. Walkley–Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: recovery, limitations and uncertainty. Soil Use and Management, 23: 221–229. Wadman W.P., De Haan, S., 1997. Decomposition of organic matter from 36 soils in a longterm pot experiment. Plant and Soil 189, 289-301. Wagenet, R.J. and Hutson, J.L., 1989. LEACHM: leaching estimation and chemistry model, continuum, vol. 2, version 2. Water Resources Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca. Wagner, G., Desaules, A., Muntau, H., Theocharopoulos, S. & Quevauviller, P. 2001. Harmonisation and quality assurance in pre-analytical steps of soil contamination studies -- conclusions and recommendations of the CEEM Soil project. The Science of the Total Environment 264, 103-118. Whitman, R.V., 1984, Evaluating calculated risk in geotechnical engineering. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110(2), 145-188. 80
Willigen P. de, 1991. Nitrogen turn-over in the soil-crop system; comparison of fourteen simulation models. Fertil Res 27:141–149 Willigen P. de, and Neeteson, J.J., 1985 Comparison of six simulation models for the nitrogen cycle in the soil. Fert Res 8:157-171 Willigen, P. de, Janssen, B.H., Heesmans, H.I.M., Conijn, J.G., Velthof, G.J., Chardon, W. J., 2008. Decomposition and accumulation of organic matter in soil. Comparison of some models. Alterra report 1726. Alterra, the Netherlands. Wischmeier, W.H., and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agriculture Handbook 537. Wu, T.H., Tang, W.H. and Einstein, H.H., 1996, Landslide Hazard and Risk Assessment in Landslides Wutzler, T. and Reichstein, M., 2007. Soils apart from equilibrium – consequences for soil carbon balance modelling. Biogeosciences, 4, 125–136. Yang, H.S., Janssen, B.H., 2000. A mono-component model of carbon mineralization with a dynamic rate constant. European Journal of Soil Science 51, 517-529. Zezere, J. L., 2002, Landslide susceptibility assessment considering landslide typology, A case study in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, European Geophysical Society, 2, 73- 82. Zhang., C, and McGrath, D., 2004. Geostatistical and GIS analyses on soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of southeastern Ireland from two different periods. Geoderma 119: 261-275. 81
Page 1 and 2:
Risk Assessment Methodologies of So
Page 3 and 4:
Risk Assessment Methodologies of So
Page 5:
Table of Content 1. Introduction to
Page 8 and 9:
Possible consequences of not harmon
Page 10 and 11:
scientists and policy makers. More
Page 12 and 13:
Several European wide risk assessme
Page 14 and 15:
2.2 Data collection The types of er
Page 16 and 17:
The majority (7 out of 11) of the i
Page 18 and 19:
Table 2.1 Use of risk levels and/or
Page 20 and 21:
Data processing phase For the data
Page 23 and 24:
3. Subsoil compaction Jan J.H. van
Page 25 and 26:
Table 3.1. Information used in the
Page 27 and 28:
3.3 Data processing and data interp
Page 29 and 30:
Precompression stress classes: 1 Ve
Page 31 and 32:
RAMs based on measurements and expe
Page 33:
compaction leads to decreased crop
Page 36 and 37: Figure 4.1. Map of saline and sodic
Page 38 and 39: 5 4 3 2 1 0 Soil typological unit (
Page 40 and 41: An experimental RAM that directly r
Page 42 and 43: 4.5 Risk perception Whereas the qua
Page 44 and 45: It appears that the assessment of E
Page 47 and 48: 5. Soil organic matter decline P.J.
Page 49 and 50: the SOM content, e.g. fertiliser re
Page 51 and 52: Models differ in their description
Page 53 and 54: 5.4 Data interpretation Data interp
Page 55: more cost-efficient RAM through ada
Page 58 and 59: These five types may sometimes be c
Page 60 and 61: Table 6.1 Definition of indicators
Page 63 and 64: 7. Towards harmonization of risk as
Page 65 and 66: Cumulative use of methods (fraction
Page 67: Table 7.3. Summary of matching indi
Page 70 and 71: The two component of Soil Threat In
Page 73 and 74: 9. Conclusions The soils in Europe
Page 75 and 76: 10 Cited literature Ahlberg P., Sti
Page 77 and 78: Davidson, E.A., Janssens, I.A., 200
Page 79 and 80: Hearn G.J. and Griffiths J.S., 2001
Page 81 and 82: Lee E.M. and Jones DKC, 2004, Lands
Page 83 and 84: Richter, D.D., Hofmockel, M., Calla
Page 85: Tóth, G. 2008. Soil quality in the
Page 89 and 90: Annex 2. RAMSOIL report series Repo
Page 91 and 92: European Commission EUR 24097 EN -
show all

Risk Assessment Methodologies of Soil Threats in Europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?