02.08.2013 Views

National exposé is not a balanced view: MPC

National exposé is not a balanced view: MPC

National exposé is not a balanced view: MPC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Manitoba Co-operator | December 13, 2012 17<br />

CROPS<br />

H U S B A N D R Y — T H E S C I E N C E , S K I L L O R A R T O F F A R M I N G<br />

Seed growers consider<br />

field inspection options<br />

The Canadian Seed Growers Association endorses an exclusive, third-party provider<br />

saying it would be simpler and more efficient, but some growers want competition<br />

By Allan Dawson<br />

CO-OPERATOR STAFF /BRANDON<br />

Canadian seed growers are<br />

grappling with options<br />

to privatize field inspection<br />

services the Canadian Food<br />

Inspection Agency (CFIA) will drop<br />

in 2014 due to federal government<br />

budget cuts announced in March.<br />

The inspections are part of the<br />

process leading to pedigreed seed<br />

certification.<br />

Last month the Canadian Seed<br />

Growers Association’s (CSGA)<br />

board of directors endorsed the<br />

<strong>not</strong>-for-profit Canadian Seed Institute’s<br />

plan to replace CFIA as the<br />

exclusive provider of pedigreed<br />

field crop inspections, CSGA executive<br />

director Dale Adolphe told the<br />

Manitoba Seed Growers Association’s<br />

(MSGA) annual meeting Dec.<br />

6.<br />

“From the CSGA’s standpoint<br />

there’s a considerable amount of<br />

work, time, effort and expense<br />

around data management in order<br />

to operate with a multiple number<br />

of (providers)... and the simplest<br />

model for CSGA <strong>is</strong> one where there<br />

<strong>is</strong> an exclusive third-party provider<br />

like the CSI model,” Adolphe said.<br />

“In other words really the privatization<br />

of what CFIA <strong>is</strong> currently doing<br />

rather than a shotgun to (say) 200<br />

service providers or 3,500.”<br />

But some MSGA members are<br />

questioning that approach. Plumas<br />

seed grower Randy Court suggested<br />

competition might better serve<br />

seed growers.<br />

“To me th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> the greatest opportunity<br />

in our lifetime to rebuild th<strong>is</strong><br />

model, to rebuild crop inspection<br />

in Canada and free ourselves from<br />

single-service providers, which has<br />

always been a challenge,” he said.<br />

“So to me we’ve got to open our<br />

minds here and think bigger and<br />

say, ‘can we handle multiple-service<br />

providers, can we change the<br />

way we do inspection in Canada?’<br />

Don’t keep thinking about how<br />

we’re going to replace what we<br />

have, think about how to rebuild<br />

what we have.<br />

Roy van Wyk, executive director<br />

of the Canadian Seed Institute, said<br />

a single provider would be more<br />

Better seed<br />

in so many weighs<br />

Every year, DuPont Pioneer conducts over 1000 large-scale canola,<br />

corn and soybean trials - more than any other seed company in<br />

Western Canada. Ask your local Pioneer Hi-Bred sales rep for details.<br />

www.pioneer.com<br />

During the Manitoba Seed Growers Association’s (MSGA) annual meeting in Brandon Dec. 6 Dale Adolphe (l) of the Canadian Seed<br />

Growers Association and Roy van Wyk (r) of the Canadian Seed Institute (CSI) promoted the idea of CSI taking over as the exclusive<br />

provider of pedigreed crop field inspection from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in 2014. However, some MSGA members<br />

suggested multiple providers would keep costs down and service up. PHOTOS: ALLAN DAWSON<br />

efficient and benefit from economies<br />

of scale. With multiple providers<br />

growers could end up with<br />

several different inspectors resulting<br />

in higher costs. It could also<br />

result in “cherry-picking,” leaving<br />

seed growers with smaller fields in<br />

remote areas without inspectors.<br />

“When you start thinking<br />

through it the model we had with<br />

CFIA was a pretty damn good<br />

model,” Adolphe said. “And the<br />

privatization of that into a single,<br />

exclusive third-party inspection<br />

model <strong>is</strong> the conclusion that the<br />

board of directors came up with a<br />

couple of weeks ago.”<br />

CSI, created 15 years ago to do<br />

audits and inspections related to<br />

seed and quality control, has five<br />

full-time staff and 28 to 30 contractors.<br />

If it were to take over CFIA’s<br />

field inspections it hopes to contract<br />

most of the 120 casual inspectors<br />

working seasonally for CFIA,<br />

van Wky said.<br />

CSI also proposes joining forces<br />

with AgCall, a firm that hires and<br />

co-ordinates contract employees<br />

to work on agricultural-related<br />

projects to meet its client’s need.<br />

AgCall has 4,000 associates across<br />

Canada and has experience in crop<br />

inspection and auditing.<br />

CFIA <strong>is</strong> also considering other<br />

replacement options, including<br />

what’s referred to as first-party<br />

inspection and second-party<br />

inspection. Both ex<strong>is</strong>t, but on a very<br />

limited bas<strong>is</strong>.<br />

First-party inspection <strong>is</strong> where a<br />

company <strong>is</strong> growing its own firstgeneration<br />

seed with in-season<br />

variety verification testing, Adolphe<br />

said. It’s currently done with<br />

the production of hybrid corn and<br />

canola.<br />

Second-party inspection <strong>is</strong> where<br />

a seed company <strong>is</strong> the assignee,<br />

seed grower and variety developer.<br />

DuPont Pioneer does th<strong>is</strong> with soybeans<br />

in Ontario and <strong>is</strong> the only<br />

firm doing it, Adolphe said.<br />

Oak River seed grower Eric<br />

McLean said with the proper training<br />

seed growers could inspect<br />

their own fields, which would be<br />

cheaper and timelier.<br />

But van Wyk said that approach<br />

could undermine the integrity of<br />

the seed certification system.<br />

CSGA <strong>is</strong> also going to an electronic<br />

system to speed up the certification<br />

process, which could<br />

reduce the turnaround time for<br />

results from three weeks to a few<br />

days.<br />

There <strong>is</strong>n’t much time — just one<br />

“I want to make<br />

sure the message <strong>is</strong><br />

clear — CFIA <strong>is</strong> <strong>not</strong><br />

walking away from<br />

its role in terms of<br />

being Canada’s seed<br />

authority.”<br />

BRIAN LEMON<br />

growing season — to change to the<br />

new system, said Brian Lemon,<br />

director of CFIA’s field crops and<br />

inputs div<strong>is</strong>ion.<br />

“Getting people on side will be<br />

critical,” he said.<br />

CFIA <strong>is</strong> getting out of field<br />

inspection of pedigreed crops, but<br />

<strong>is</strong> still responsible for overseeing<br />

seed certification, he said.<br />

“Certainly we’re <strong>not</strong> getting out of<br />

th<strong>is</strong>,” Lemon said. “I want to make<br />

sure the message <strong>is</strong> clear — CFIA<br />

<strong>is</strong> <strong>not</strong> walking away from its role<br />

in terms of being Canada’s seed<br />

authority.”<br />

allan@fbcpubl<strong>is</strong>hing.com<br />

All purchases are subject to the terms of labelling and purchase documents.<br />

The DuPont Oval Logo <strong>is</strong> a reg<strong>is</strong>tered trademark of DuPont.<br />

®, TM, SM Trademarks and service marks licensed to Pioneer Hi-Bred Limited. © 2012 PHL.<br />

The PROVING GROUND.<br />

TM<br />

PR343 PG CPS Weigh.indd 1 04/10/12 3:59 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!