- Page 1 and 2: Nonlinear Optical Probes and Proces
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Table of Contents
- Page 5 and 6: References . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 7 and 8: List of Figures 2.1 Schematic exper
- Page 9 and 10: 3.31 Time evolution of the diffract
- Page 11 and 12: Nonlinear Optical Probes and Proces
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 Introduction From ancient
- Page 15 and 16: of the polarization density is [2]
- Page 17 and 18: degenerate four-wave mixing and the
- Page 19 and 20: (Section 3.3) as well as photorefra
- Page 21 and 22: References [1] R. Boyd. Nonlinear o
- Page 23 and 24: the optics of nonlinear devices bas
- Page 25 and 26: materials. The figure-of-merit may
- Page 27 and 28: generation of charge carriers, tran
- Page 29 and 30: after the interference pattern is c
- Page 31 and 32: transport is mostly due to drift ra
- Page 33 and 34: 2 1' 2' 1 1 Detector 2 d 2 E a 2
- Page 35 and 36: coincide. However, due to refractio
- Page 37 and 38: The equation to be solved is the wa
- Page 39 and 40: It is obvious that the differential
- Page 41 and 42: the symmetry group of the crystal a
- Page 43 and 44: much weaker than the writing beams
- Page 45 and 46: where d is the thickness of the sam
- Page 47: ability to reorient in the space ch
- Page 51 and 52: ficiency is the external applied fi
- Page 53 and 54: photogeneration efficiency φ then
- Page 55 and 56: where α is the absorption coeffici
- Page 57 and 58: Energy 0 g( ) i Figure 2.6: Schem
- Page 59 and 60: charge carrier mobility arises from
- Page 61 and 62: 2.2.3 Charge trapping and detrappin
- Page 63 and 64: Eqs. 2.29 and so, we will assume be
- Page 65 and 66: However, Eq. 2.44 was derived under
- Page 67 and 68: So, in this case the form of the so
- Page 69 and 70: independent ζ0 [17]. We substitute
- Page 71 and 72: on the both photoconductivity and p
- Page 73 and 74: Trap-unlimited regime In this secti
- Page 75 and 76: m xa 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1 -1 TMT1
- Page 77 and 78: simplify these to: ˜ λ1 ≈ 1; ˜
- Page 79 and 80: - 6 0 , 10 40 30 20 10 simulated d
- Page 81 and 82: and ˜γ, the correct estimate of i
- Page 83 and 84: is no longer valid, so the followin
- Page 85 and 86: tion 2.3.2, we show how the ionized
- Page 87 and 88: numerical simulation of the dynamic
- Page 89 and 90: The first order system of equations
- Page 91 and 92: where C, ˜ C are constants determi
- Page 93 and 94: Diffr.eff. , arb.units 1 0.8 0.6 0.
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 2.15: PR speed ν calculated
- Page 97 and 98: a real system the effect from a cha
- Page 99 and 100:
ρ0(t) ≈ ˜ρ0 and ionized accept
- Page 101 and 102:
the PR performance, in particular d
- Page 103 and 104:
2.4.1 “Simple” electro-optic ef
- Page 105 and 106:
Eq. 2.71 and compared to the measur
- Page 107 and 108:
For one-dimensional molecules whose
- Page 109 and 110:
applied electric field Ea, but also
- Page 111 and 112:
or, in terms of microscopic quantit
- Page 113 and 114:
The photoconductivity part of the P
- Page 115 and 116:
[14] Y. Cui, B. Swedek, N. Cheng, J
- Page 117 and 118:
[41] P. Gunter and J.-P. Huignard,
- Page 119 and 120:
Next, in Section 3.4, we will discu
- Page 121 and 122:
a) NC O O C 60 NC O NC O NC PVK c)
- Page 123 and 124:
transport is only conducted through
- Page 125 and 126:
NA of the C60 molecules (see Figure
- Page 127 and 128:
3.3 Photoconductivity experiments I
- Page 129 and 130:
photogenerated in the bulk during a
- Page 131 and 132:
voltage V , but the voltage V0 at w
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 3.4: Electric field dependen
- Page 135 and 136:
320nm Nd:YAG laser with Raman shift
- Page 137 and 138:
zero. In these equations, q is the
- Page 139 and 140:
non-Gaussian charge transport. In t
- Page 141 and 142:
30 V/ m 30 C 0 40 C 0 50 C 0 Figure
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 3.9: Dependence of the mobil
- Page 145 and 146:
a) b) Figure 3.10: Current transien
- Page 147 and 148:
Conventionally, in the DC photocond
- Page 149 and 150:
a) b) 40 V/ m 100 mW/cm 2 Figure 3.
- Page 151 and 152:
1 0= 770 s -1 -1 = 4.35 s B = 1.66
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 3.14: Trapping parameter γT
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 3.15: Long time scale photoc
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 3.16: Example of the photocu
- Page 159 and 160:
He-Ne laser Beam Splitter Polarizat
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 2.3. Then, the ratio of the
- Page 163 and 164:
to explore experimentally which mec
- Page 165 and 166:
In most of the PR polymer composite
- Page 167 and 168:
disappeared, we opened the other wr
- Page 169 and 170:
Now we describe the general trends
- Page 171 and 172:
ciency is an increasing function of
- Page 173 and 174:
are defined in Eqs. 2.58). Eq. 3.23
- Page 175 and 176:
state diffraction efficiency was th
- Page 177 and 178:
Figure 3.26: Dependence of the fast
- Page 179 and 180:
E a) b) Applied electri
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure 3.28: Dependence of the fast
- Page 183 and 184:
(i) calculate the PR speed as deter
- Page 185 and 186:
h h C 60 (N A ) s T 1 E PVK PDCST
- Page 187 and 188:
ferences that affect dissociation r
- Page 189 and 190:
serve that the addition of all chro
- Page 191 and 192:
is simplified. Knowing the availabl
- Page 193 and 194:
the free hole with the ionized acce
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 3.30: Intensity dependence o
- Page 197 and 198:
3.5.2 Plasticized composites This c
- Page 199 and 200:
the recombination rate γ and the s
- Page 201 and 202:
h h h h h h C 60 (N (NA) A) s s s
- Page 203 and 204:
Figure 3.33: Concentration dependen
- Page 205 and 206:
mophore may contain a large error d
- Page 207 and 208:
ather requires knowing trapping rat
- Page 209 and 210:
Figure 3.36: Time evolution of diff
- Page 211 and 212:
and for low concentrations of AODCS
- Page 213 and 214:
concentration x10 %. For the lower
- Page 215 and 216:
3.6 Summary of Chapter 3 In Chapter
- Page 217 and 218:
References [1] W. E. Moerner and S.
- Page 219 and 220:
[27] J. Schildkraut and Y. Cui. Zer
- Page 221 and 222:
[51] A. Blythe. Electrical Properti
- Page 223 and 224:
E = 0 E 0 Fi
- Page 225 and 226:
chromophores are randomly oriented
- Page 227 and 228:
where the local field factors are g
- Page 229 and 230:
system, and k is Boltzmann’s cons
- Page 231 and 232:
Ar Laser + Ti:Sapphire Laser Spectr
- Page 233 and 234:
Figure 4.4: Typical data in the EFI
- Page 235 and 236:
and the birefringence ∆n(t) is pr
- Page 237 and 238:
experiment is the applied field. Ho
- Page 239 and 240:
nature. For the transient shown in
- Page 241 and 242:
Figure 4.7: Illustration of the HeN
- Page 243 and 244:
the screening of the external elect
- Page 245 and 246:
is accompanied by the reduction in
- Page 247 and 248:
References [1] W. E. Moerner, S. M.
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 5 Second harmonic generatio
- Page 251 and 252:
2 d 2 0 L Figure 5.1: Schematic
- Page 253 and 254:
of the nonlinear susceptibilities i
- Page 255 and 256:
x z E p E s Figure 5.2:
- Page 257 and 258:
(a) (b) (c)
- Page 259 and 260:
to βz ′ z ′ z ′ as follows [
- Page 261 and 262:
d31 = N 2 〈cos θ sin2 θ〉〈co
- Page 263 and 264:
Thus, SHG measurements of the azimu
- Page 265 and 266:
a) b) 10 5 -10 -5 5 10 15 -5 -10 c)
- Page 267 and 268:
Nd:YAG “Reference” PMT 2 F Quar
- Page 269 and 270:
( ) ( ) H3C Si (CH2) 11 O NO2 H 3C
- Page 271 and 272:
Figure 5.11: Maker fringes observed
- Page 273 and 274:
We observed light-induced alignment
- Page 275 and 276:
polarized UV light. The intensity o
- Page 277 and 278:
and then d31 = d sub 31 + N 4 cos
- Page 279 and 280:
The angular dependence of the secon
- Page 281 and 282:
= ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ sin Φ d25cos 2 Φ s
- Page 283 and 284:
S-input polarization The case of s-
- Page 285 and 286:
pf,y = 0 pf,x = 1 ω nf bf,x = pf,
- Page 287 and 288:
References [1] M. B. Feller, W. Che
- Page 289 and 290:
Chapter 6 Summary In this, final, C
- Page 291 and 292:
anticipated from the theoretical mo
- Page 293 and 294:
Bibliography Abkowitz, M., Bassler,
- Page 295 and 296:
Daubler, T. K., Bittner, R., Meerho
- Page 297 and 298:
Kuzyk, M. G., and Dirk, C. W., Eds.
- Page 299 and 300:
Reznikov, Y., Ostroverkhova, O., Si
- Page 301:
Zilker, S. J., Grasruck, M., Wolff,