05.08.2013 Views

PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation

PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation

PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sixth <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> w o r k s h o p 53<br />

USING GPS COLLARS TO ESTIMATE MOUNTAIN LION<br />

PREDATION RATES AND SELECTION OF LARGE PREY<br />

CHUCK R. ANDERSON, Jr., Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Box 3166, University<br />

Station, Laramie, Wyoming 82071.<br />

FRED G. LINDZEY, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Box 3166, University Station,<br />

Laramie, Wyoming 82071.<br />

Abstract: We collared 10 mountain lions (Puma<br />

concolor) with Global Positioning System (GPS)<br />

transmitters between September 1999 and April<br />

2000 to identify detailed winter movement<br />

patterns and evaluate prey selection and predation<br />

rates. GPS collars were fitted on 2 adult males<br />

(3 years old), 3 juvenile females (1.5-2.5 years old),<br />

and 5 adult females. We retrieved collars during<br />

spring 2000 and plotted GPS locations on<br />

1:100,000-scale topographic maps in Arc-ViewTM<br />

to identify potential predation sites from location<br />

clusters. GPS positions averaged 3-5 locations/day/individual<br />

of the 6 programmed<br />

location attempts. We are verifying predation sites<br />

using hand-held GPS navigation units to locate<br />

clusters from GPS collars. We have detected prey<br />

remains at 53 location clusters (34 mule deer<br />

(Odocoileus hemionus), 14 elk (Cervus elaphus) ,<br />

and 5 pronghorn (Antiliocapra americana)), and<br />

mean error from cluster center to prey remains was<br />

39 m (range: 0-90 m). Preliminary results suggest<br />

that location clusters with nocturnal locations for<br />

2 nights exhibit a high probability of being a<br />

predation site. Efficacy of GPS collars to estimate<br />

mountain lion predation rates and prey selection,<br />

and methods of estimation will be presented.<br />

VIRAL DISEASES AND COUGAR DEMOGRAPHY<br />

ROMAN BIEK*, Wildlife Biology Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812.<br />

CHUCK R. ANDERSON, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming,<br />

Laramie, WY 82071.<br />

TONI K. RUTH, Hornocker Wildlife Inst., 2023 Stadium Drive, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59719.<br />

KERRY M. MURPHY, Yellowstone Center for Resources, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190.<br />

MARK R. JOHNSON, Yellowstone Center for Resources, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190.<br />

COLIN M. GILLIN, Center for Conservation Medicine, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North<br />

Grafton, MA 01536.<br />

MARY POSS, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812.<br />

Abstract: Viruses are commonly detected in freeranging<br />

cougars (Puma concolor) but little is<br />

known about the demographic implications of<br />

these infections. While viral pathogens can<br />

obviously have an effect on cougar survival and<br />

fecundity, cougar population parameters such as<br />

size and movement in turn are likely to influence<br />

the temporal and spatial dynamics of virus infections.<br />

Examining the patterns of virus occurrence<br />

might thus provide important insights into cougar<br />

population characteristics. We tested serum from<br />

more than 120 cougars from 2 locations, Northern<br />

Yellowstone (MT) and Snowy Range (WY), for<br />

evidence of exposure to several viral pathogens of<br />

wild felines. In addition, we used polymerase chain<br />

reaction (PCR) to detect current infections with<br />

feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) in those<br />

animals. Samples were taken over periods of<br />

several years and included a high proportion of<br />

family groups as well as a number of sequential<br />

samples from the same individuals. We present<br />

results on the observed patterns of virus exposure<br />

and infection in the 2 populations and discuss<br />

possible implications for cougar demography.<br />

Furthermore, we introduce the idea of using the<br />

phylogenetic relationships of FIV, a retrovirus that<br />

genetically changes at extraordinary rates, to<br />

make inferences on cougar population structure<br />

and disease transmission history.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!