PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation
PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation
PWD BK W7000-893 Proceedings.CDR - Mountain Lion Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sixth <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> w o r k s h o p 53<br />
USING GPS COLLARS TO ESTIMATE MOUNTAIN LION<br />
PREDATION RATES AND SELECTION OF LARGE PREY<br />
CHUCK R. ANDERSON, Jr., Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Box 3166, University<br />
Station, Laramie, Wyoming 82071.<br />
FRED G. LINDZEY, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Box 3166, University Station,<br />
Laramie, Wyoming 82071.<br />
Abstract: We collared 10 mountain lions (Puma<br />
concolor) with Global Positioning System (GPS)<br />
transmitters between September 1999 and April<br />
2000 to identify detailed winter movement<br />
patterns and evaluate prey selection and predation<br />
rates. GPS collars were fitted on 2 adult males<br />
(3 years old), 3 juvenile females (1.5-2.5 years old),<br />
and 5 adult females. We retrieved collars during<br />
spring 2000 and plotted GPS locations on<br />
1:100,000-scale topographic maps in Arc-ViewTM<br />
to identify potential predation sites from location<br />
clusters. GPS positions averaged 3-5 locations/day/individual<br />
of the 6 programmed<br />
location attempts. We are verifying predation sites<br />
using hand-held GPS navigation units to locate<br />
clusters from GPS collars. We have detected prey<br />
remains at 53 location clusters (34 mule deer<br />
(Odocoileus hemionus), 14 elk (Cervus elaphus) ,<br />
and 5 pronghorn (Antiliocapra americana)), and<br />
mean error from cluster center to prey remains was<br />
39 m (range: 0-90 m). Preliminary results suggest<br />
that location clusters with nocturnal locations for<br />
2 nights exhibit a high probability of being a<br />
predation site. Efficacy of GPS collars to estimate<br />
mountain lion predation rates and prey selection,<br />
and methods of estimation will be presented.<br />
VIRAL DISEASES AND COUGAR DEMOGRAPHY<br />
ROMAN BIEK*, Wildlife Biology Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812.<br />
CHUCK R. ANDERSON, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming,<br />
Laramie, WY 82071.<br />
TONI K. RUTH, Hornocker Wildlife Inst., 2023 Stadium Drive, Suite 7, Bozeman, MT 59719.<br />
KERRY M. MURPHY, Yellowstone Center for Resources, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190.<br />
MARK R. JOHNSON, Yellowstone Center for Resources, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190.<br />
COLIN M. GILLIN, Center for Conservation Medicine, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North<br />
Grafton, MA 01536.<br />
MARY POSS, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812.<br />
Abstract: Viruses are commonly detected in freeranging<br />
cougars (Puma concolor) but little is<br />
known about the demographic implications of<br />
these infections. While viral pathogens can<br />
obviously have an effect on cougar survival and<br />
fecundity, cougar population parameters such as<br />
size and movement in turn are likely to influence<br />
the temporal and spatial dynamics of virus infections.<br />
Examining the patterns of virus occurrence<br />
might thus provide important insights into cougar<br />
population characteristics. We tested serum from<br />
more than 120 cougars from 2 locations, Northern<br />
Yellowstone (MT) and Snowy Range (WY), for<br />
evidence of exposure to several viral pathogens of<br />
wild felines. In addition, we used polymerase chain<br />
reaction (PCR) to detect current infections with<br />
feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) in those<br />
animals. Samples were taken over periods of<br />
several years and included a high proportion of<br />
family groups as well as a number of sequential<br />
samples from the same individuals. We present<br />
results on the observed patterns of virus exposure<br />
and infection in the 2 populations and discuss<br />
possible implications for cougar demography.<br />
Furthermore, we introduce the idea of using the<br />
phylogenetic relationships of FIV, a retrovirus that<br />
genetically changes at extraordinary rates, to<br />
make inferences on cougar population structure<br />
and disease transmission history.