LIST OF REFERENCES 1. Bunton, R. W., and Denegri, C. M., “Limit Cycle Oscillation Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Fighter Aircraft,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2000, pp. 916-918. 2. Pasiliao, C. L., and Dubben, J. A., “Analysis <strong>of</strong> CFD Pressure Coefficients on the F-16 Wing Associated with Limit Cycle Oscillations,” AIAA Paper 2008-0409, January 2008. 3. Pasiliao, C. L., and Dubben, J. A., “Determination <strong>of</strong> Flow Field Characteristics <strong>of</strong> F-16 Wing Associated with Limit Cycle Oscillations Using CFD,” Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the NATO RTO Symposium AVT-152 on Limit-Cycle Oscillations and other Amplitude-Limited, Self-Excited Vibrations, N<strong>or</strong>way, May 2008. 4. Pasiliao, C. L., and Dubben, J. A., “CFD Based Determination <strong>of</strong> Transonic Flow Field Characteristics <strong>of</strong> F-16 Wing Associated with LCO,” AIAA-2009-1084, January 2009. 5. Pasiliao, C. L., and Dubben, J. A., “Transient Analysis <strong>of</strong> Transonic Flow Field Characteristics <strong>of</strong> F-16 Wing Associated with LCO,” Abstract Accepted to Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the IFASD Conference, Seattle, WA, June 2009. 6. Bisplingh<strong>of</strong>f, R. L., Ashley, H., and Halfman, R. L., Aeroelasticity, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1955. 7. Denegri, C. M., Jr., and Cutchins, M. A., “Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Classical Flutter Analysis f<strong>or</strong> the Prediction <strong>of</strong> Limit Cycle Oscillations,” AIAA Paper 1997-1021, April 1997. 8. Denegri, C. M., Jr., “Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Flutter Engineering,” Air F<strong>or</strong>ce SEEK EAGLE Office Training Materials, Eglin AFB, FL, June 2003. 9. Hassig, H. J., “An Approximate True Damping Solution <strong>of</strong> the Flutter Equation by Determinant Iteration,” AIAA Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 3, No. 11, 1971, pp. 885-889. 10. Ward, D. T., and Strganac, T. W., Introduction to Flight Test Engineering, 2 nd Ed., Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Company, 2001, pp. 218-250. 11. N<strong>or</strong>ton, W. J., “Limit Cycle Oscillation and Flight Flutter Testing,” 21 st Annual Symposium Proceedings, Society <strong>of</strong> Flight Test Engineers, Lancaster, CA, 1990, pp. 3.4- 1–3.4-12. 12. Denegri, C. M., Jr., “Limit Cycle Oscillation Flight Test Results <strong>of</strong> a Fighter with External St<strong>or</strong>es,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2000, pp. 761-769. 13. Denegri, C. M., Jr., “Limit Cycle Oscillation Flight Test Results <strong>of</strong> a Fighter with External St<strong>or</strong>es,” AIAA Paper 2000-1394, April 2000. 14. Dreyer, C. A., and Shoch, D. L., “F-16 Flutter Testing at Eglin Air F<strong>or</strong>ce Base,” AIAA Paper 86-9819, April 1986. 162
15. Dawson, K. S., and Sussinham, J. C., “F-16 Limit Cycle Oscillation Testing with Asymmetric St<strong>or</strong>es,” AIAA Paper 1999-3142, June 1999. 16. Dawson, K. S., and Maxwell, D. L., “Limit Cycle Oscillation Flight Test Results f<strong>or</strong> Asymmetric St<strong>or</strong>e Configurations,” AIAA Paper 2003-1427, April 2003. 17. Maxwell, D. L., and Dawson, K. S., “Analytical Aeroelastic Characteristics <strong>of</strong> F-16 Asymmetric External St<strong>or</strong>e Configurations,” AIAA Paper 2004-1755, April 2004. 18. Dawson, K. S., and Maxwell, D. L., “Limit Cycle Oscillation Flight-Test Results f<strong>or</strong> Asymmetric St<strong>or</strong>e Configurations,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1588- 1595. 19. Maxwell, D. L., and Dawson, K. S., “A Method to Quantitatively Compare Asymmetric In-Flight Limit-Cycle Oscillation Response,” AIAA Paper 2005-7628, December 2005. 20. Albano, E., and Rodden, W. P., “A Doublet-Lattice Method f<strong>or</strong> Calculating Lift Distributions on Oscillating Surfaces in Subsonic Flows,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1969, pp. 279-285. 21. ZONA Technology, “ZAERO Version 5.2 The<strong>or</strong>etical Manual,” Scottsdale: ZONA Technology, June 2001. 22. Silva, W., Brenner, M., Cooper, J., Denegri, C., Huttsell, L., Kaynes, I., Lind, R., Poirel, D., and Yurkovich, R., “Advanced Flutter and LCO Prediction Tools f<strong>or</strong> Flight Test Risk and Cost Reduction - An International Collab<strong>or</strong>ative Program f<strong>or</strong> T&E Supp<strong>or</strong>t,” AIAA Paper 2005-7630, December 2005. 23. Denegri, C. M., Jr., Dubben, J. A., and Maxwell, D. L., “In-Flight Wing Def<strong>or</strong>mation Characteristics During Limit Cycle Oscillations,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2005, pp. 500-508. 24. Denegri, C. M., Jr., Dubben, J. A., and Maxwell, D. L., “In-Flight Wing Def<strong>or</strong>mation Characteristics During Limit Cycle Oscillations,” AIAA Paper 2003-1426, April 2003. 25. Harder, R. L., and Desmarais, R. N., “Interpolation Using Surface Splines,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1972, pp. 189-191. 26. Desmarais, R. N., and Bennett, R. M., “Automated Procedure f<strong>or</strong> Computing Flutter Eigenvalues,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1974, pp. 75–80. 27. Dowell, E. H., Edwards, J. W. and Strganac, T., "Nonlinear Aeroelasticity," Journal <strong>of</strong> Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2003, pp. 857-874. 28. N<strong>or</strong>thington, J. S., and Pasiliao, C. L., “F-16 Wing Structural Deflection Testing – Phase I,” AIAA Paper 2007-1674, February 2007. 163
- Page 1 and 2:
TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSONIC FLOW
- Page 3 and 4:
To Dodjie 3
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .
- Page 7 and 8:
Summary ...........................
- Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1 F-1
- Page 11 and 12:
6-9 Lissajous plots of upper surfac
- Page 13 and 14:
6-45 2-D (left column) and 3-D (rig
- Page 15 and 16:
incrementally since this capability
- Page 17 and 18:
are not sufficient to provide an an
- Page 19 and 20:
4. Contribute to the work of others
- Page 21 and 22:
Classical aircraft flutter is chara
- Page 23 and 24:
Popular methods for finding the sol
- Page 25 and 26:
LCO amplitude but not the mechanism
- Page 27 and 28:
speed for the particular configurat
- Page 29 and 30:
Denegri 23 explains the flutter fli
- Page 31 and 32:
Doublet-lattice Denegri 1, 7,12,13
- Page 33 and 34:
Batina’s work and uses an F-16 ha
- Page 35 and 36:
As a result of Denegri’s previous
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2-1. F-16 store stations. Fi
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-5. Flutter flight test bui
- Page 41 and 42:
Stokes (RANS) equations on hybrid u
- Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES Intro
- Page 45 and 46:
time-localization cannot be determi
- Page 47 and 48:
A B C D E Figure 4-3. Analysis of s
- Page 49 and 50:
(CFD) analyses in order to capture
- Page 51 and 52:
the appropriate time step for the n
- Page 53 and 54:
Wing1, is the wing-only (no fuselag
- Page 55 and 56:
similar to DES but with modificatio
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 5-1. Time step comparison of
- Page 59 and 60:
A B Figure 5-3. Flow results for 8
- Page 61 and 62:
A B Figure 5-5. Flow results for 8
- Page 63 and 64:
Figure 5-7. Turbulence model compar
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5-9. CFD vs. wind tunnel com
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 5-11. CFD vs. wind tunnel co
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 5-13. CFD vs. wind tunnel co
- Page 71 and 72:
server cluster comprised of 5,120 p
- Page 73 and 74:
of oscillation. The 88% span locati
- Page 75 and 76:
since it is proportional to lift, a
- Page 77 and 78:
of phase. Figure 6-10 B) and D) are
- Page 79 and 80:
The instantaneous Cp measurements p
- Page 81 and 82:
D Lissajous plots with time being t
- Page 83 and 84:
frequency of 8Hz. The wavelet plot
- Page 85 and 86:
vortex is observed travelling outbo
- Page 87 and 88:
near 70% chord and the second near
- Page 89 and 90:
expected from a lift curve slope. A
- Page 91 and 92:
shape of this Lissajous is nonlinea
- Page 93 and 94:
occurring at harmonics, and assumes
- Page 95 and 96:
the same direction of rotation on t
- Page 97 and 98:
the roll cycle, and the black arrow
- Page 99 and 100:
B) shows the fast Fourier transform
- Page 101 and 102:
is that shock separation aft of the
- Page 103 and 104:
on the upper surface, a much larger
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6-1. F-16 wing planform with
- Page 107 and 108:
A C B Figure 6-4. DDES of F-16 in s
- Page 109 and 110:
Cp (Non-dimensional) Cp (Non-dimens
- Page 111 and 112: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A -Cp (Non-di
- Page 113 and 114: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A -Cp (Non-di
- Page 115 and 116: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 117 and 118: A B Figure 6-14. DDES-SARC of F-16
- Page 119 and 120: Cp (Non-dimensional) Cp (Non-dimens
- Page 121 and 122: Figure 6-18. Lissajous plots of upp
- Page 123 and 124: -Cp (Non-dimensional) Frequency (Hz
- Page 125 and 126: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Frequency (
- Page 127 and 128: A B Figure 6-24. DDES-SARC of F-16
- Page 129 and 130: Cp (Non-dimensional) Cp (Non-dimens
- Page 131 and 132: Cp (Non-dimensional) Cp (Non-dimens
- Page 133 and 134: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A -Cp (Non-di
- Page 135 and 136: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A -Cp (Non-di
- Page 137 and 138: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 139 and 140: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 141 and 142: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 143 and 144: A B D Figure 6-40. DDES of F-16 in
- Page 145 and 146: Cp (Non-dimensional) Cp (Non-dimens
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 6-44. Lissajous plots of upp
- Page 149 and 150: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 151 and 152: -Cp (Non-dimensional) A Time (sec)
- Page 153 and 154: A B Figure 6-50. DDES-SARC of F-16
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 6-52. Lissajous plots of upp
- Page 157 and 158: Impact on Future Design of Aircraft
- Page 159 and 160: The size of the Mach=1 iso-surface
- Page 161: these cases in order to identify th
- Page 165 and 166: 41. Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., a
- Page 167 and 168: 67. Cunningham, A. M., Jr., and den
- Page 169 and 170: 93. Parker, G. H., Maple, R. C., an
- Page 171 and 172: 121. Travin, A. K., Shur, M. L., Sp