1st Missionary Trip - Lorin
1st Missionary Trip - Lorin
1st Missionary Trip - Lorin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tionship with Paul, but now that is going to reverse itself. The random actions reaching out to non-Jews earlier<br />
were conducted by leaders either in the Jerusalem church, or under authorization of the Jerusalem church. The<br />
Antioch Christian community by sending out Paul and Barnabas launch their own agenda to spread the Gospel<br />
without any prior consultation with Christian leaders in Jerusalem. As Luke stresses, the higher authority of God<br />
lay behind their action through the leadership of the Holy Spirit.<br />
From a literary standpoint, Luke employs here a ‘commissioning’ narrative 8 as the introduction to the<br />
missionary journey. 9 This literary pattern has its roots in the Old Testament prophetic call narratives. 10 Theologically,<br />
the more important point is Luke’s desire to stress that God continued to speak directly to individuals and<br />
to His church in the pattern of Israelite history at pivotal moments in order to make clear His desire that specific<br />
job assignments were understood and carried out. The specific tone of each such narrative will be shaped by<br />
the circumstance in which God appears to individuals or groups of individuals, but the general pattern will have<br />
basic points of commonality. Here the divine appearance comes through the words of the Holy Spirit while the<br />
church, and especially its leaders, are at worship, seeking understanding of the will of God. For Luke, such an<br />
encounter demonstrated the divine validation of the Pauline mission to the non-Jewish world. Given the profound<br />
importance of this paradigm shift in the spreading of the Gospel, such divine affirmation of its correctness would<br />
be essential. Added to this was the controversy of the proper method for receiving Gentiles into the Christian<br />
community that would explode out of this Pauline mission (cf. chapter fifteen). That God approved what Paul and<br />
Barnabas did on this initial missionary journey became all the more important for Luke’s readers to understand.<br />
Text Meaning. As a commissioning narrative, the elements of the narrative fall into four categories: introduction,<br />
confrontation, commission, and conclusion. These will serve as the framework of our examination of<br />
these verses, as per Talbot’s assessment:<br />
Introduction: ῏Ησαν δὲ ἐν Ἀντιοχείᾳ κατὰ τὴν οὖσαν ἐκκλησίαν προφῆται καὶ διδάσκαλοι ὅ τε Βαρναβᾶς<br />
καὶ Συμεὼν ὁ καλούμενος Νίγερ καὶ Λούκιος ὁ Κυρηναῖος, Μαναήν τε Ἡρῴδου τοῦ τετραάρχου σύντροφος καὶ<br />
Σαῦλος. λειτουργούντων δὲ αὐτῶν τῷ κυρίῳ καὶ νηστευόντων.... In this introductory sentence Luke identifies<br />
several aspects which serve to set up the scene.<br />
First comes the specification of location: ἐν Ἀντιοχείᾳ, in Antioch. This links the statement back to 12:25<br />
and the return of Paul and Barnabas to Antioch after delivering the relief offering at Jerusalem. 11 This in turn is<br />
linked to 11:27-30, which describes the collecting of the relief offering in Antioch. 12 The ancient city of Antioch was<br />
still ascribed to the Holy Spirit (v. 2), an extensive evangelistic journey into territory in no sense properly Jewish (though there was a<br />
Jewish element in the population, as there was in most parts of the Empire) is deliberately planned, and two associates of the local church<br />
are commissioned to execute it.” [C. K. Barrett, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, The international<br />
critical commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments (Edinburgh: T&T Clark., 2004), 598-99.]<br />
8Acts 1:4-11; 5:17-21a; 8:26-40; 9:1-19a; 10:1-23a; 11:1-18; 12:6-11; 13:1-3; 16:6-10; 18:1-11; 23:11; 27:21-26. Cf. “commissioning<br />
narratives,” at cranfordville.com [http://cranfordville.com/Actsgenl.htm#Commissioning%20Narratives]<br />
9 “Acts 13:1–3 is a commissioning story consisting of four components: (1) introduction (vv. 1–2a; cf. Gen 11:31–32); (2) confrontation<br />
(v. 2b; cf. Gen 12:1a); (3) commission (13:2c; cf. Gen 12:1b–3); and (4) conclusion (13:3; cf. Gen 12:4–5a) (Hubbard 1977, 103–26;<br />
and Hubbard 1978, 187–98).” [Charles H. Talbert, Reading Acts : A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles,<br />
Rev. ed., Reading the New Testament series (Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 2005), 116.]<br />
10 “Form-critical discussions of the call narratives found in Exod. 3:1–4, Judg. 6, Jer. 1, Isa. 6, and Ezek. 1 have focussed on the basic<br />
structural similarity of these texts, and have arrived at a variety of conclusions about the nature and origin of these stories. While there<br />
is general agreement as to the commonality of a number of elements in most of the texts, the precise number and definition of these elements<br />
remains in dispute. Thus N. Habel proposed six such elements: divine confrontation, introductory word, commission, objection to<br />
the commission, reassurances and promise of assistance, and the sign. He reached the conclusion that the formal model of the charging<br />
of a messenger lies behind the prophetic narratives. In Habel’s estimation this charge is best exhibited by Gen. 24 (despite the absence<br />
of theophanic elements in that text), and this ‘secular’ form was adapted to the prophetic call narrative. W. Richter denned a similar set<br />
of components, but saw the purpose of the form as establishing a model for the commissioning of a saviour for Israel, and includes the<br />
account of the choosing of Saul in 1 Sam. 9–10. W. Zimmerli, sensitive to variations in the narratives, developed a two-tiered model,<br />
the first reflected in the narratives of Moses, Gideon, Saul and Jeremiah, and the second revealed in the calls of Isaiah, and Micaiah ben<br />
Yimlah in 1 Kgs 22.<br />
Page 189<br />
13 ” [George W. Savran, Encountering the Divine: Theophany in Biblical Narrative (London; New York: T & T Clark<br />
International, 2005), 8-9.]<br />
1125 Βαρναβᾶς δὲ καὶ Σαῦλος ὑπέστρεψαν εἰς Ἰερουσαλὴμ3 πληρώσαντες τὴν διακονίαν, συμπαραλαβόντες Ἰωάννην τὸν<br />
ἐπικληθέντα Μᾶρκον. Then after completing their mission in Jerusalem Barnabas and Saul returned and brought with them John, whose<br />
other name was Mark.<br />
1227 Ἐν ταύταις δὲ ταῖς ἡμέραις κατῆλθον ἀπὸ Ἱεροσολύμων προφῆται εἰς Ἀντιόχειαν. 28 ἀναστὰς δὲ εἷς ἐξ αὐτῶν ὀνόματι Ἅγαβος<br />
ἐσήμανεν διὰ τοῦ πνεύματος λιμὸν μεγάλην μέλλειν ἔσεσθαι ἐφʼ ὅλην τὴν οἰκουμένην, ἥτις ἐγένετο ἐπὶ Κλαυδίου. 29 τῶν δὲ μαθητῶν,<br />
καθὼς εὐπορεῖτό τις, ὥρισαν ἕκαστος αὐτῶν εἰς διακονίαν πέμψαι τοῖς κατοικοῦσιν ἐν τῇ Ἰουδαίᾳ ἀδελφοῖς· 30 ὃ καὶ ἐποίησαν<br />
ἀποστείλαντες πρὸς τοὺς πρεσβυτέρους διὰ χειρὸς Βαρναβᾶ καὶ Σαύλου.<br />
27 At that time prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. 28 One of them named Agabus stood up and predicted by the Spirit