08.08.2013 Views

1st Missionary Trip - Lorin

1st Missionary Trip - Lorin

1st Missionary Trip - Lorin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tionship with Paul, but now that is going to reverse itself. The random actions reaching out to non-Jews earlier<br />

were conducted by leaders either in the Jerusalem church, or under authorization of the Jerusalem church. The<br />

Antioch Christian community by sending out Paul and Barnabas launch their own agenda to spread the Gospel<br />

without any prior consultation with Christian leaders in Jerusalem. As Luke stresses, the higher authority of God<br />

lay behind their action through the leadership of the Holy Spirit.<br />

From a literary standpoint, Luke employs here a ‘commissioning’ narrative 8 as the introduction to the<br />

missionary journey. 9 This literary pattern has its roots in the Old Testament prophetic call narratives. 10 Theologically,<br />

the more important point is Luke’s desire to stress that God continued to speak directly to individuals and<br />

to His church in the pattern of Israelite history at pivotal moments in order to make clear His desire that specific<br />

job assignments were understood and carried out. The specific tone of each such narrative will be shaped by<br />

the circumstance in which God appears to individuals or groups of individuals, but the general pattern will have<br />

basic points of commonality. Here the divine appearance comes through the words of the Holy Spirit while the<br />

church, and especially its leaders, are at worship, seeking understanding of the will of God. For Luke, such an<br />

encounter demonstrated the divine validation of the Pauline mission to the non-Jewish world. Given the profound<br />

importance of this paradigm shift in the spreading of the Gospel, such divine affirmation of its correctness would<br />

be essential. Added to this was the controversy of the proper method for receiving Gentiles into the Christian<br />

community that would explode out of this Pauline mission (cf. chapter fifteen). That God approved what Paul and<br />

Barnabas did on this initial missionary journey became all the more important for Luke’s readers to understand.<br />

Text Meaning. As a commissioning narrative, the elements of the narrative fall into four categories: introduction,<br />

confrontation, commission, and conclusion. These will serve as the framework of our examination of<br />

these verses, as per Talbot’s assessment:<br />

Introduction: ῏Ησαν δὲ ἐν Ἀντιοχείᾳ κατὰ τὴν οὖσαν ἐκκλησίαν προφῆται καὶ διδάσκαλοι ὅ τε Βαρναβᾶς<br />

καὶ Συμεὼν ὁ καλούμενος Νίγερ καὶ Λούκιος ὁ Κυρηναῖος, Μαναήν τε Ἡρῴδου τοῦ τετραάρχου σύντροφος καὶ<br />

Σαῦλος. λειτουργούντων δὲ αὐτῶν τῷ κυρίῳ καὶ νηστευόντων.... In this introductory sentence Luke identifies<br />

several aspects which serve to set up the scene.<br />

First comes the specification of location: ἐν Ἀντιοχείᾳ, in Antioch. This links the statement back to 12:25<br />

and the return of Paul and Barnabas to Antioch after delivering the relief offering at Jerusalem. 11 This in turn is<br />

linked to 11:27-30, which describes the collecting of the relief offering in Antioch. 12 The ancient city of Antioch was<br />

still ascribed to the Holy Spirit (v. 2), an extensive evangelistic journey into territory in no sense properly Jewish (though there was a<br />

Jewish element in the population, as there was in most parts of the Empire) is deliberately planned, and two associates of the local church<br />

are commissioned to execute it.” [C. K. Barrett, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, The international<br />

critical commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments (Edinburgh: T&T Clark., 2004), 598-99.]<br />

8Acts 1:4-11; 5:17-21a; 8:26-40; 9:1-19a; 10:1-23a; 11:1-18; 12:6-11; 13:1-3; 16:6-10; 18:1-11; 23:11; 27:21-26. Cf. “commissioning<br />

narratives,” at cranfordville.com [http://cranfordville.com/Actsgenl.htm#Commissioning%20Narratives]<br />

9 “Acts 13:1–3 is a commissioning story consisting of four components: (1) introduction (vv. 1–2a; cf. Gen 11:31–32); (2) confrontation<br />

(v. 2b; cf. Gen 12:1a); (3) commission (13:2c; cf. Gen 12:1b–3); and (4) conclusion (13:3; cf. Gen 12:4–5a) (Hubbard 1977, 103–26;<br />

and Hubbard 1978, 187–98).” [Charles H. Talbert, Reading Acts : A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles,<br />

Rev. ed., Reading the New Testament series (Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 2005), 116.]<br />

10 “Form-critical discussions of the call narratives found in Exod. 3:1–4, Judg. 6, Jer. 1, Isa. 6, and Ezek. 1 have focussed on the basic<br />

structural similarity of these texts, and have arrived at a variety of conclusions about the nature and origin of these stories. While there<br />

is general agreement as to the commonality of a number of elements in most of the texts, the precise number and definition of these elements<br />

remains in dispute. Thus N. Habel proposed six such elements: divine confrontation, introductory word, commission, objection to<br />

the commission, reassurances and promise of assistance, and the sign. He reached the conclusion that the formal model of the charging<br />

of a messenger lies behind the prophetic narratives. In Habel’s estimation this charge is best exhibited by Gen. 24 (despite the absence<br />

of theophanic elements in that text), and this ‘secular’ form was adapted to the prophetic call narrative. W. Richter denned a similar set<br />

of components, but saw the purpose of the form as establishing a model for the commissioning of a saviour for Israel, and includes the<br />

account of the choosing of Saul in 1 Sam. 9–10. W. Zimmerli, sensitive to variations in the narratives, developed a two-tiered model,<br />

the first reflected in the narratives of Moses, Gideon, Saul and Jeremiah, and the second revealed in the calls of Isaiah, and Micaiah ben<br />

Yimlah in 1 Kgs 22.<br />

Page 189<br />

13 ” [George W. Savran, Encountering the Divine: Theophany in Biblical Narrative (London; New York: T & T Clark<br />

International, 2005), 8-9.]<br />

1125 Βαρναβᾶς δὲ καὶ Σαῦλος ὑπέστρεψαν εἰς Ἰερουσαλὴμ3 πληρώσαντες τὴν διακονίαν, συμπαραλαβόντες Ἰωάννην τὸν<br />

ἐπικληθέντα Μᾶρκον. Then after completing their mission in Jerusalem Barnabas and Saul returned and brought with them John, whose<br />

other name was Mark.<br />

1227 Ἐν ταύταις δὲ ταῖς ἡμέραις κατῆλθον ἀπὸ Ἱεροσολύμων προφῆται εἰς Ἀντιόχειαν. 28 ἀναστὰς δὲ εἷς ἐξ αὐτῶν ὀνόματι Ἅγαβος<br />

ἐσήμανεν διὰ τοῦ πνεύματος λιμὸν μεγάλην μέλλειν ἔσεσθαι ἐφʼ ὅλην τὴν οἰκουμένην, ἥτις ἐγένετο ἐπὶ Κλαυδίου. 29 τῶν δὲ μαθητῶν,<br />

καθὼς εὐπορεῖτό τις, ὥρισαν ἕκαστος αὐτῶν εἰς διακονίαν πέμψαι τοῖς κατοικοῦσιν ἐν τῇ Ἰουδαίᾳ ἀδελφοῖς· 30 ὃ καὶ ἐποίησαν<br />

ἀποστείλαντες πρὸς τοὺς πρεσβυτέρους διὰ χειρὸς Βαρναβᾶ καὶ Σαύλου.<br />

27 At that time prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. 28 One of them named Agabus stood up and predicted by the Spirit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!