08.08.2013 Views

Pt Two

Pt Two

Pt Two

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNIT NINE: Neoclassicism STUDY GUIDE<br />

A Richard Boyle (Earl of Burlington) and William Kent. Chiswick House (near London, England), begun<br />

1725<br />

clear alternative to the splendors of Versailles/ Palladian classicism to create a “rational” look<br />

1. “In England, the Baroque- and especially Rococo, with all its frills – was rejected in the<br />

eighteenth century in favor of renewed interest in the ordered, classicizing appearance of<br />

Palladian architecture. Palladio‟s Four Books of Architecture was published in an English<br />

translation in 1715, and exerted widespread influence. An early example of English<br />

Palladian style is Chiswick House on the southwestern outskirts of London, which Lord<br />

Burlington (1695-1753) began in 1725 as a library and place for entertainments” (Adams,<br />

Art Across Time 691). “Lord Burlington was one of a powerful coterie of Whigs and<br />

supporters of the House of Hanover (George I and his family). He took a Grand Tour of<br />

Europe in 1714 to 1715 and returned to Italy in 1719 to revisit Palladio‟s buildings. On<br />

his return to England, he became an accomplished architect in the tradition of Palladio”<br />

(691). “Burlington based Chiswick House loosely on Palladio‟s Villa Rotonda, although it is on a<br />

smaller scale, and there are some significant differences in the plans. Unlike the Villa Rotonda,<br />

Chiswick House did not need four porticos. Instead, it has one, which is approached by lateral<br />

double staircases on each side. The arrangement of the rooms around a central octagon rather than<br />

a circle is also different, and the columns are Corinthian rather than Ionic as in the Villa Rotonda.<br />

There are no gable sculptures, and the roof is decorated on each side by a row of obelisks, which<br />

function as chimney flues. The dome is shallower than that of the Villa Rotonda, and rests on an<br />

octagonal drum, allowing more light into the central chamber” (692).<br />

2. “The building plan shares the geometrical symmetry of Palladio‟s villa, although its central core is octagonal rather than round and<br />

there are only two entrances. The main entrance, flanked now by matching staircases, is a Roman temple front, a flattering reference to<br />

the building‟s inhabitant. Chiswick‟s elevation is characteristically Palladian, with a main floor resting on a basement, and tall<br />

rectangular windows with triangular pediments. The result is a lucid evocation of Palladio‟s design, whose few but crisp details seem<br />

perfectly suited to the refined proportions of the whole. The popularity of the Palladian style among members of Burlington‟s class during<br />

the ensuing decades may be judged by the fact that Hogarth satirized the style in his Marriage a la Mode suite. The architect looking out<br />

the window in The Marriage Contract is probably a caricature of Burlington himself. In Rome, Burlington had persuaded an English<br />

expatriate, William Kent (1685-1748), to return to London as his collaborator. Kent designed Chiswick‟s surprisingly ornate interior as<br />

well as the grounds, the latter in a style that became known throughout Europe as the „English landscape garden.‟ Kent‟s garden, in<br />

contrast to the regularity and rigid formality of Baroque gardens, featured winding paths, a lake with a cascade, irregular plantings and<br />

shrubs, and other effects imitating the appearance of the natural rural landscape. The English landscape garden was another indication<br />

of the growing Enlightenment emphasis on the natural” (Stokstad, Art History 943).<br />

3. “Palladio appealed to the English partly because his designs for villas were well-suited to English country houses and partly because<br />

his style accorded with the Rule of Taste promoted by the Enlightenment philosopher Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury.<br />

What distinguishes the Palladian revival from earlier classicisms, however, is less its external appearance than its motivation Instead of<br />

merely reasserting the superior authority of the ancients, it claimed to satisfy the demands of reason and thus to be more „natural‟ than<br />

the Baroque. At the time the Baroque style was identified with papist Rome by English Protestants, with absolutist France by George I,<br />

and with Tory policies by the Whig opposition. Thus began an association with between Neoclassicism and liberal politics that was to<br />

continue through the French Revolution. The appeal to reason found support in Palladio himself, who decried abuses „contrary to natural<br />

reason‟ on the grounds that „architecture, as well as all other arts, being an imitation of nature, can suffer nothing that either alienates or<br />

deviates from that which is agreeable to nature‟. This rationalism helps to explain the abstract, segmented look of Chiswick House on<br />

Burlington‟s estate. Adapted by Burlington and Kent from the Villa Rotonda, as well as other Italian sources, it is compact, simple, and<br />

geometric- the antithesis of the Baroque pomp of Blenheim Palace. The concept was not new to England. It had been used on a larger<br />

scale just a couple of years earlier at Mereworth castle by Campbell. Chiswick is at once bolder and more rigorous, yet less derivative<br />

than Mereworth. Campbell himself acknowledged Burlington as „not only a great Patron of all Arts, but the first Architect‟. The exterior<br />

surfaces are flat and unbroken, the ornament is meager, and the temple portico juts out abruptly from the blocklike body of the structure.<br />

The interior, probably by Kent, is more luxurious, in the manner of Jones, but with a clarity that looks forward to Robert Adam” (Janson<br />

650, 652).<br />

4. “In eighteenth-century Britain the majority of works of art and architecture, whether houses or gardens, paintings or sculptures, were<br />

created for a wealthy, predominantly English and aristocratic minority of the population. But those works express certain attitudes-<br />

above all the notion that sense of one‟s own grandeur or self-importance is something to be cautiously and carefully expressed- which<br />

were shared by the nation as a whole. Those same attitudes are present, albeit in a very different form, in the art that stood at the<br />

opposite end of the spectrum from the art of the aristocracy. The eighteenth century saw the beginnings of the British love and genius for<br />

satire: the ironizing and diminishing of the noble, the wealthy, the famous, which has remained a stock-in-trade of popular art and<br />

journalism for more than two centuries” (Graham-Dixon 94). “Following William Kent‟s lead, landscape architecture flourished in the<br />

hands of such designers as Lancelot (‘Capability’) Brown and Henry Flitcroft. In 1743, the banker Henry Hoare redid the grounds of<br />

his estate at Stourhead in Wiltshire with the assistance of Flitcroft, a protégé of Burlington. The resulting gardens at Stourhead carried<br />

William Kent‟s ideas much further. Stourhead is, in effect, an exposition of the picturesque, with orchestrated views dotted with Greek<br />

and Roman temples, grottoes, copies of antique statues, and such added delights as a rural cottage, a Chinese bridge, a Gothic spire, and<br />

a Turkish tent” (Stokstad, Art History 943).<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!