Aspecifieke nekpijn: diagnose en behandeling - KCE
Aspecifieke nekpijn: diagnose en behandeling - KCE
Aspecifieke nekpijn: diagnose en behandeling - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ezzo J,<br />
Haraldsson BG,<br />
Gross AR, Myers<br />
CD, Mori<strong>en</strong> A,<br />
Goldsmith CH,<br />
Bronfort G,<br />
Peloso PM:<br />
Massage for<br />
mechanical neck<br />
disorders: A<br />
systematic<br />
review. Volume<br />
32. 2007:353-362.<br />
Gemmell H, Miller<br />
P: Comparative<br />
effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess of<br />
manipulation,<br />
mobilisation and<br />
the Activator<br />
instrum<strong>en</strong>t in<br />
treatm<strong>en</strong>t of nonspecific<br />
neck<br />
pain: A<br />
systematic<br />
review. Volume<br />
14. 2006.<br />
42 Non-Specific Neck Pain: diagnosis and treatm<strong>en</strong>t <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 119<br />
high (8) 2007 A systematic review<br />
to assess the effect of<br />
massage on pain,<br />
function, pati<strong>en</strong>t<br />
satisfaction, cost of<br />
care and adverse<br />
ev<strong>en</strong>ts in adults with<br />
neck pain.<br />
high (7) 2006 A systematic review<br />
to critically appraise<br />
the literature that<br />
directly compared<br />
manipulation,<br />
mobilisation and the<br />
Activator instrum<strong>en</strong>t<br />
for non‐specific neck<br />
pain.<br />
1. Ammer and Rathkolb, 1990<br />
2. Brodin, 1985<br />
3. C<strong>en</strong>, 2003<br />
4. Fialka, 1989<br />
5. Gam, 1998<br />
6. Hant<strong>en</strong>, 1997<br />
7. Hant<strong>en</strong>, 2000<br />
8. hou, 2002<br />
9. Hoving, 2002<br />
10. Irnich, 2001<br />
11. jordan, 1998<br />
12. Karlberg, 1996<br />
13. Koes, 1991‐1992)<br />
14. Kogstad, 1978<br />
15. Levoska, 1993<br />
16. Nilsson, 1995‐1997<br />
17. Provinciali, 1996<br />
18. Reginiuss<strong>en</strong>, 2000<br />
19. Schnabel, 2002<br />
1. Vernon, 1990<br />
2. Cassidy, 1991<br />
3. Yurkiw, 1996<br />
4. Wood, 2001<br />
5. Hurwitz, 2002<br />
sept.<br />
2004<br />
oct.<br />
2005<br />
adults who cerveral<br />
suffered from masage<br />
acute (90 days). MND<br />
(with whiplash<br />
grade I‐II<br />
included), NDH<br />
and NDR<br />
(inclusion of<br />
whiplash grade<br />
III)<br />
pati<strong>en</strong>ts<br />
suffering non‐<br />
specific neck<br />
pain, age or<br />
duration of<br />
symptoms was<br />
not considered.<br />
techniques<br />
were included.<br />
Massage in<br />
multimodal<br />
approaches.<br />
Hig Velocity<br />
Low Amplitude<br />
rotational<br />
manipulation<br />
(HVLA‐rotation<br />
manipulation),<br />
oscillatory<br />
mobilisation,<br />
Activator,<br />
deversified<br />
HVLA<br />
manipulation,<br />
post isometric<br />
relaxation<br />
(PIR), HVLA<br />
manipulation<br />
with heat,<br />
HVLA<br />
manipulation<br />
without heat,<br />
HVLA with<br />
electrical<br />
stimulation,<br />
HVLA without<br />
electrical<br />
stimulation,<br />
obilisation with<br />
no treatm<strong>en</strong>t,<br />
other<br />
multimodal<br />
approaches, …<br />
the differ<strong>en</strong>t<br />
treatm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
modalities<br />
compared with<br />
each other<br />
effect on pain,<br />
function, pati<strong>en</strong>t<br />
satisfaction, cost of<br />
care and adverse<br />
ev<strong>en</strong>ts<br />
Pressure pain<br />
treshold.<br />
Numerical rating<br />
scale (NRS) for pain.<br />
Cervical ROM.<br />
Cervical lateral<br />
flexion.<br />
VAS for pain.<br />
NRS for pain.<br />
Neck Disability<br />
index.<br />
SF‐36.<br />
Adverse reactions<br />
with care.<br />
Pati<strong>en</strong>t global<br />
assessm<strong>en</strong>t.<br />
inability to pool data. no level of evid<strong>en</strong>ce could be found for<br />
massage alone compared with a contral.<br />
No level of evid<strong>en</strong>ce could be found for<br />
or against massage in the studies that<br />
combined massage with other methods.<br />
No firm statem<strong>en</strong>t can be made about<br />
the efficacy of massage for neck pain due<br />
to the limitations of existing studies.<br />
not remlevant because of poor quality of included studies due to lack in quantity and quality of<br />
studies reviewed, more high‐quality<br />
research is needs to be done before a<br />
recomm<strong>en</strong>dation can be made as to<br />
which type of manual therapy has better<br />
effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess and safety profile for non‐<br />
specific neck pai.