13.08.2013 Views

OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING

OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING

OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION 7<br />

4 RESEARCH ISSUES<br />

At the start of this chapter, I wrote that observational learning has proved to be effective<br />

in different school subjects, including writing where I referred, among other<br />

studies, to the studies of Couzijn (1995, 1999). The current thesis is a continuation<br />

of Couzijn’s studies and the research issues in this thesis result mainly from<br />

Couzijn’s outcomes.<br />

Couzijn (1995, 1999; see also Couzijn & Rijlaarsdam, 1996) conducted several<br />

experimental studies to assess the effects of observational learning. He compared<br />

observational conditions in which students observed writing processes and products<br />

with conditions in which students performed writing tasks themselves (learning-bydoing).<br />

He showed that observational learning was more effective for writing than<br />

learning-by-doing. However, Couzijn’s studies about observational learning can be<br />

characterized as ‘input-output’ research. He studied the effects of observational<br />

learning on writing products and did not focus on underlying processes. In the current<br />

thesis, my main goal is to get more insight in these underlying processes. I will<br />

focus on three issues (these issues largely coincide with the boxes and arrows as<br />

presented in Figure 1.1):<br />

• The observational process. There is a need to know how observation contributes<br />

to learning gains. How do students process observation tasks? Which elements<br />

in observation tasks contribute to learning gains?<br />

• Influence of learners’ characteristics on the effectiveness of the instructions for<br />

observational learning. The effectiveness of observational learning depends on<br />

a number of instructional and personal factors (Schunk, 1987, 1991, 1998).<br />

Couzijn focused on a relatively homogeneous group of students (relatively high<br />

ability) and examined one type of instruction for observational learning. Students<br />

observed pairs of models and had to reflect on the weaker model of each<br />

pair. One could ask whether all students learn from reflecting on the weaker<br />

model, especially if they are good students. Thus, the issue examined is which<br />

type of instruction is effective for which type of student.<br />

• Effect of observational learning on the mediating variable ‘writing processes’.<br />

Couzijn found effects of observational learning on writing products. He assumed<br />

– as in the theoretical framework in Figure 1.1 – that these effects were<br />

caused by changes in writing processes. In his studies, this assumption was not<br />

studied. My contribution to the theoretical framework is to study the effect of<br />

observational learning on writing processes.<br />

5 STUDIES <strong>IN</strong> THIS THESIS<br />

This thesis consists of six chapters, and describes four different studies about observational<br />

learning in argumentative writing. Chapters 2 to 5 address the studies that<br />

examine the issues mentioned in the previous section. Each chapter has been submit-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!