Crogan, P. (2010) Knowledge, care and trans-individuation: An in ...
Crogan, P. (2010) Knowledge, care and trans-individuation: An in ...
Crogan, P. (2010) Knowledge, care and trans-individuation: An in ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, soul, spirit or “embodiment”) prior to, mysteriously parallel<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
<strong>trans</strong>cend<strong>in</strong>g this co-<strong>in</strong>cidence. While this proposition resonates with many<br />
accounts of the prosthetic nature of human be<strong>in</strong>g (Derrida 1976, Lyotard<br />
1991, Deleuze <strong>and</strong> Guattari 1988, Wills 1995, Haraway 1991), the relentless<br />
rigour with which Stiegler pursues <strong>and</strong> applies this assertion <strong>in</strong> the Technics<br />
<strong>and</strong> Time series causes one to reflect on how difficult it is <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> critical practice) to undo decisively the marg<strong>in</strong>alization of tekhne<br />
that was one of the found<strong>in</strong>g moves of Western metaphysics (1998: 1).<br />
This approach laid the foundation for subsequent series such as De la Misère<br />
Symbolique (2004-2005), Mécréance et Discrédit (2004-2006) <strong>and</strong> Prendre So<strong>in</strong><br />
(2008). These series <strong>and</strong> other recent works elaborate strident critiques of<br />
the globaliz<strong>in</strong>g corporate capitalist-driven <strong>trans</strong>formation of the “program<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries” <strong>and</strong> its destructive (<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>deed self-destructive) underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the processes through which <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> collectives co-<strong>in</strong>dividuate<br />
successfully, that is, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to manage to project for themselves a viable<br />
future. Stiegler always <strong>in</strong>sists, however, on the necessity of critical re-<br />
engagement with <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flection of technological <strong>trans</strong>formation –<br />
digitization, convergence, realtime communication, <strong>in</strong>teractivity, “psycho-<br />
technologies” (Stiegler, Petit <strong>and</strong> Bontems 2008) – as the only possible<br />
means of counter<strong>in</strong>g the discredit<strong>in</strong>g of social <strong>and</strong> political <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong><br />
the grow<strong>in</strong>g fragmentation, cynicism <strong>and</strong> nihilism that attend this loss of<br />
credit.<br />
3