13.08.2013 Views

New York/ New Jersey Harbor: Alternative Methods for Ex ... - CLU-IN

New York/ New Jersey Harbor: Alternative Methods for Ex ... - CLU-IN

New York/ New Jersey Harbor: Alternative Methods for Ex ... - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The soil or fill product passed all of the metal and PCB standards and general guidelines<br />

<strong>for</strong> dioxins and 2,3,7,8 TCDD.<br />

The decontamination analysis <strong>for</strong> 2,3,7,8 TCDD and dioxins is in Appendix F. The<br />

average removal efficiency <strong>for</strong> three dioxins: PeCDD, HxCDD, HpCDD, was about 51%.<br />

The removal efficiency <strong>for</strong> TCDD was roughly 5%. The removal efficiency <strong>for</strong> 2,3,7,8<br />

TCDD was approximately 61%. The concentration of 2,3,7,8 TCDD in the treated<br />

sediment was 35.3 ppt, which is below the general standard of 1 ppb.<br />

The decontaminated sediment passed all of the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Residential and Non-<br />

Residential Standards <strong>for</strong> metals, as shown in Appendix G. On average, the metal<br />

concentrations in the treated sediment were more than 89% below the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong><br />

Residential and Non-Residential Standard.<br />

As shown in Appendix H, the PCB concentration of the treated sediment was found to be<br />

203 ppb, which is below the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Recommended Soil Standard, 1000 ppb, and the<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Residential and Non-Residential Soil Standards, 480 and 2000 ppb,<br />

respectively.<br />

The standards that the end-product did not pass were the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Residential Soil<br />

Standards <strong>for</strong> benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene,<br />

benzo(k)fluoranthene, and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene. The soil or fill also did not pass the<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Non-Residential Soil Standard <strong>for</strong> benzo(a)pyrene 2 . Data was missing <strong>for</strong><br />

three of the nine SVOCs considered in this study: N-Nitrosodiphenylamine, bis-2-<br />

ethylhexylphthlate, and di-n-butyl phthalate. The remaining six SVOC concentrations of<br />

the untreated sediment were an average of 42% above the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Residential Soil<br />

Standards and 36% below the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Non-Residential Soil Standards. The<br />

concentrations of these five out of these six SVOCs were below the detection limit in the<br />

untreated sediment. These data can be found in Appendix I.<br />

2 The <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> Non-Residential and Residential Soil Standards are the same.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!