15.08.2013 Views

POP FICTION

POP FICTION

POP FICTION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreword<br />

FOREWORD<br />

Film music studies has been undergoing what might be thought of as a naissance - the first<br />

significant period of fertility - in the past few years. There is, undoubtedly, a case to be made that<br />

there was an early flourishing of works at the time of the birth of sound on film, with works such<br />

as Leonid Sabaneev’s 1935 Music for the Films and Kurt London’s 1936 Film Music, for<br />

example. But those works were not speaking to each other, and thus, to my mind, they did not<br />

constitute a field or an object of study. One might also argue that the current blossoming actually<br />

begin in the late 80’s and early 90’s, with Unheard Melodies (Gorbman, 1987), Settling the<br />

Score (Kalinak, 1992), and Strains of Utopia (Flinn, 1992). And in some ways, that’s clearly<br />

true. But it took most of the 1990s for that opening to really take root.<br />

The past few years, however, have heard an explosion of work. Suddenly, there are books like<br />

Martin Marks Music and the Silent Film, anthologies like Soundtrack Available and Music and<br />

the Cinema, articles in film and music journals, and conference panels and even entire<br />

conferences. And what that means, of course, is that as a community of scholars we can begin<br />

asking much more interesting, detailed questions. That’s where this present volume comes in.<br />

Unlike any other collection, all of the essays here focus on a single song and its place in a single<br />

film. Perhaps this sounds like an obvious approach. But in fact, most work on film music (with a<br />

few significant exceptions) has accepted the received notion that pre-existing songs do not play<br />

significant roles in the film that houses them. Pop Fiction does away with that notion once and<br />

for all. In all 12 essays, these authors make compelling cases that the films in question would be<br />

markedly different were it not for the song they discuss.<br />

In some ways, the delight of this volume is the wide range of theoretical and disciplinary<br />

approaches to the topic. Several essays use psychoanalytic paradigms. For example, in Always<br />

Blue: Chet Baker’s Voice, John Roberts focuses on the intersections of Chet Baker’s biography<br />

and the grain of his voice to argue that while both his addition and his vocal limitations have<br />

been used to dismiss Baker as a vocalist, other interpretations are possible. Roberts suggests that<br />

Baker offers what psychoanalytic theorists call “the good voice” of the mother, creating a<br />

“sonorous envelope” in which the listening subject can bask. Thus, Baker’s performance of<br />

Always Blue, written for him by Elvis Costello, in Let’s Get Lost, Bruce Weber’s 1986<br />

documentary biography of Baker, offers a hauntingly beautiful space of pleasure.<br />

In “Music, Masculinity and Membership,” Ian Inglis discusses Frankie Valli’s Can’t Take My Eyes<br />

off of You in Michael Cimino’s 1978 The Deer Hunter, showing how the careful placement of a<br />

song can create multiple layers of meaning. Inglis argues that, in this case, the song opens<br />

[5]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!