The Impact of Air Quality Regulations on Distributed ... - NREL
The Impact of Air Quality Regulations on Distributed ... - NREL
The Impact of Air Quality Regulations on Distributed ... - NREL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.1 Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />
Chapter 1. Introducti<strong>on</strong> and Methodology<br />
This report investigates the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> air<br />
quality permitting <strong>on</strong> a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recent<br />
distributed generati<strong>on</strong> (DG) projects and<br />
identifies a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ways in which the<br />
present structure and applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> air quality<br />
regulati<strong>on</strong>s are inefficient or inappropriate in<br />
their treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DG. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> report analyzes<br />
these issues and presents recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
for improving the regulatory structure. 2<br />
DG is generally defined as electricity<br />
generati<strong>on</strong> located at or close to the point <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
use. 3 This study focuses <strong>on</strong> small (less than 15<br />
megawatts (MW) per unit) fossil-fueled<br />
distributed electric generators and in<br />
particular <strong>on</strong>:<br />
• Gas-fired technologies<br />
• Combined heat and power (CHP)<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Technologies with inherently low<br />
emissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Applicati<strong>on</strong>s that use waste or byproduct<br />
fuels<br />
DG <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fers users many potential operati<strong>on</strong>al,<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omic, and envir<strong>on</strong>mental advantages.<br />
2 While any remaining errors or omissi<strong>on</strong>s are those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
authors, the following individuals deserve acknowledgement<br />
for their willingness to review the draft report at various<br />
stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its preparati<strong>on</strong> and provide invaluable guidance:<br />
Chris James, C<strong>on</strong>necticut Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Protecti<strong>on</strong>; John Kelley, GTI; Leslie Witherspo<strong>on</strong>, Solar<br />
Turbines; Shirley Rivera, AESC, Inc; Art Smith, NiSource,<br />
Inc.; and Sara Hayes, EEA. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, our thanks go to<br />
the many project developers, owners, and regulators who<br />
participated in the survey and follow-up interviews, and to<br />
Joe Brys<strong>on</strong> and Luis Troche <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the EPA, who spent a great<br />
deal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time with us reviewing an earlier draft. Finally, the<br />
authors thank Joseph Galdo, DOE Office <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Distributed</strong><br />
Energy and Electricity Reliability; and Richard DeBlasio and<br />
Gary Nakarado <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Renewable Energy<br />
Laboratory for their support in this project.<br />
3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> definiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DG is discussed further in Chapter 2.<br />
1<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Energy Policy issued by the<br />
White House in May 2001 4 recognizes the<br />
efficiency gains from DG achieved by<br />
eliminating electric transmissi<strong>on</strong> and<br />
distributi<strong>on</strong> losses, use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thermal output for<br />
CHP, and integrating <strong>on</strong>-site energy<br />
efficiency and generating capabilities. Much<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> today’s market for DG is driven by needs<br />
that cannot be met by central generati<strong>on</strong>, such<br />
as emergency generati<strong>on</strong>, reliability, and<br />
power quality. Finally, many DG<br />
technologies have lower emissi<strong>on</strong>s than the<br />
average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the central generating grid and can<br />
provide an envir<strong>on</strong>mental benefit in<br />
displacing central generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
However, it has been claimed by many in the<br />
DG industry that envir<strong>on</strong>mental permitting is<br />
a serious challenge to the deployment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DG<br />
technologies. 5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is c<strong>on</strong>cern that<br />
permitting does not appropriately address the<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a DG project or give<br />
credit for the envir<strong>on</strong>mental benefits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DG.<br />
This report investigates the sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerns and presents specific<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for developing nati<strong>on</strong>al and<br />
state policies that would promote clean DG in<br />
a way that is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with nati<strong>on</strong>al and state<br />
air quality goals.<br />
1.2 Approach<br />
This study analyzed specific DG project case<br />
studies to review the current framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> air<br />
4 Nati<strong>on</strong>al Energy Policy, “Reliable, Affordable, and<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mentally Sound Energy for America’s Future,”<br />
Report <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Energy Policy Development Group,<br />
May 2001.<br />
5 “<strong>Distributed</strong> Generati<strong>on</strong> Challenges: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Air</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Quality</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Siting,<br />
Permitting,” Shirley F. Rivera, Winter 2000-01—Vol. 20,<br />
No. 3 Issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Energy Matters. See DOE Office <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Industrial<br />
Technologies, Best Practices, <strong>on</strong>line supplement,<br />
http://www.oit.doe.gov/bestpractices/energymatters/emextra/<br />
pdfs/63-79_rivera.pdf.