15.08.2013 Views

How to invest in private equity - BVCA admin

How to invest in private equity - BVCA admin

How to invest in private equity - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>How</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

You should refer <strong>to</strong> your <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment consultant for detailed, specific advice on<br />

<strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment.<br />

What do I need for a successful <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment strategy?<br />

A long-term <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment horizon.<br />

A suitable <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment benchmark return when consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment.<br />

• To select the right method of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>to</strong> suit your requirements (see "Methods of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong>"). This usually entails engag<strong>in</strong>g a specialist <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> manager.<br />

A spread of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments <strong>to</strong> diversify the types and stages of the <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ee companies.<br />

<strong>How</strong> much should I commit?<br />

An <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r is rarely required <strong>to</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> its maximum commitment <strong>to</strong> a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund, with<br />

funds typically draw<strong>in</strong>g down from 80%-95% of commitments. Commonly, only a maximum of 60% of<br />

an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r's <strong>to</strong>tal commitment is outstand<strong>in</strong>g at any one time.<br />

<strong>How</strong> is the cash I have committed actually drawn?<br />

Cash is usually drawn down on an <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment by <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment basis (generally <strong>in</strong> years one <strong>to</strong> five).<br />

Cash is returned <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r as and when <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments are realised (often from year three<br />

onwards). This can mean that with<strong>in</strong> a four- <strong>to</strong> six-year period, you could receive back as much as<br />

you have committed <strong>to</strong> a fund.<br />

A fund <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> is likely <strong>to</strong> take longer <strong>to</strong> repay commitment than one focused on<br />

buy-outs.<br />

<strong>How</strong> is my <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment realised?<br />

Even though funds generally have a 10-12 year life, typically they beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong> return cash <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

after three <strong>to</strong> five years. A mature portfolio of several <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds is usually highly cash<br />

generative.<br />

If one of the <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments made by the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> manager is realised through flotation, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> the fund are occasionally offered the shares <strong>in</strong> the newly quoted company. More<br />

usually, the shares are held with<strong>in</strong> the fund until f<strong>in</strong>ally sold by the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> manager.<br />

There is a small but grow<strong>in</strong>g secondary market <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds. This offers <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs a way<br />

of exit<strong>in</strong>g from their entire <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> portfolio before it is wound up. <strong>How</strong>ever, secondary<br />

trades <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds are often undertaken at a discount and <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs should not rely on<br />

the secondary market. Details of secondary purchasers can be found <strong>in</strong> the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s Direc<strong>to</strong>ry of<br />

Members, under 'associate f<strong>in</strong>ancial members' and on the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s website.<br />

<strong>How</strong> do <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers raise funds?<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> firms usually manage funds structured as limited partnerships and tend <strong>to</strong> raise a<br />

new fund every three <strong>to</strong> five years. A fund-rais<strong>in</strong>g can be spread over several months.<br />

When rais<strong>in</strong>g a fund, a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm will produce a <strong>private</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g memorandum. This<br />

document gives detailed <strong>in</strong>formation on:<br />

• the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm;<br />

• the funds and the <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments it previously and currently manages and their performances;<br />

• valuation of unrealised <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment and valuation policy;


• the firm's executives and their relevant experience;<br />

• the fees chargeable and management <strong>in</strong>centives;<br />

• the fund's <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment strategy;<br />

• report<strong>in</strong>g methods and details of how often reports will be published.<br />

This memorandum may be sent <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions directly by the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm or via<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediaries such as plac<strong>in</strong>g agents and <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment consultants.<br />

<strong>How</strong> do I f<strong>in</strong>d out who is fund rais<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

See the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s list of funds currently be<strong>in</strong>g raised on the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s website under '<strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs'.<br />

Also on this website is the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s searchable direc<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms for contact details.<br />

Introduce yourself <strong>to</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms and get on their mail<strong>in</strong>g lists. Details of firms that<br />

manage limited partnership funds can also be found on the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s website under '<strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs'.<br />

Read the press. Some funds publicise their fund-rais<strong>in</strong>g activities through lett<strong>in</strong>g journalists know,<br />

but they are not permitted by law <strong>to</strong> advertise that they are rais<strong>in</strong>g a fund. A fortnightly<br />

publication called "...unquote" lists the details of most funds be<strong>in</strong>g raised (published by Initiative<br />

Europe on 01737-784 200).<br />

Speak <strong>to</strong> your <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment advisers who are frequently contacted by <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms and<br />

placement agents.


Methods of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

<strong>How</strong> can I <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>?<br />

Through <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds alongside other <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs. These are typically structured as limited<br />

partnerships (fund route).<br />

Through a fund managed exclusively for your scheme by a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund manager (segregated<br />

route).<br />

Through quoted venture and development capital <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trusts (<strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trust route).<br />

Through a "fund of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds" managed by a gatekeeper (fund of funds route).<br />

By mak<strong>in</strong>g direct <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> unquoted companies (direct route).<br />

Fund route<br />

Pros<br />

Over 200 <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds enabl<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

wide selection of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment<br />

opportunities<br />

Wide range and number of <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong> managers seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> raise new<br />

funds <strong>in</strong> which <strong>to</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> over the next<br />

few years<br />

High level of control<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> funds are directly<br />

accountable <strong>to</strong> you<br />

Many <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund managers take<br />

a position on the board of the company<br />

<strong>in</strong> which they <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> <strong>to</strong> keep <strong>in</strong> close<br />

contact with the company's<br />

development<br />

Established <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds have a<br />

high level of expertise and quality deal<br />

flow.<br />

Segregated route<br />

Pros<br />

High level of control<br />

Good accountability and direct contact<br />

Flexible - no fixed time period and can<br />

be tailored <strong>to</strong> your requirements, eg.<br />

commitment period.<br />

Investment trust route<br />

Pros<br />

Share price reported on a daily basis<br />

Liquidity<br />

Many <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trust managers take a<br />

position on the board of the company <strong>in</strong><br />

which they <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> <strong>to</strong> keep <strong>in</strong> close<br />

contact with the company's<br />

Cons<br />

Need for staff or advisers <strong>to</strong> achieve and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a good knowledge of <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong> fund managers, fund rais<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

portfolio content, performance, etc<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum level of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment may apply.<br />

Cons<br />

Requires very substantial funds <strong>to</strong> be<br />

commercially viable and <strong>to</strong> spread risk.<br />

Cons<br />

Shares may trade at a discount <strong>to</strong> net<br />

asset value<br />

Increases correlation of returns with<br />

quoted markets.


development<br />

Established <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trusts have a<br />

high level of expertise and quality deal<br />

flow<br />

Relatively low fees and transaction cost.<br />

Fund of funds route<br />

Pros<br />

Access <strong>to</strong> a diversified <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

portfolio elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the risk of underdiversification<br />

Expertise <strong>in</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

funds, knowledge of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

managers' performance, methods,<br />

portfolios, fund rais<strong>in</strong>g tim<strong>in</strong>gs, etc<br />

Offers an <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

fund <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment for those who do not<br />

yet wish <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>-house or<br />

direct fund <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imises adm<strong>in</strong>istration - e.g. only one<br />

set of calls and distributions <strong>to</strong> deal<br />

with.<br />

Direct route<br />

Pros<br />

Full control<br />

Direct access <strong>to</strong> unquoted companies.<br />

Cons<br />

Additional layer of fees (from the<br />

gatekeeper and the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund<br />

manager)<br />

Potential barrier between <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r and<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers,<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g contact with, and<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of, the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

market<br />

Slightly longer-term commitment (up <strong>to</strong><br />

15 years).<br />

Cons<br />

Full responsibility<br />

Requires very substantial funds <strong>to</strong><br />

achieve an adequate spread of<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments<br />

Cost and commitment: need for<br />

substantial permanent specialist staff<br />

Staff need expertise <strong>in</strong> negotiat<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

structur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment,<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g the companies and exits<br />

Requires access <strong>to</strong> potential <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment<br />

opportunities, as success depends on<br />

quality and quantity of deal flow.


What key po<strong>in</strong>ts should I consider when select<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

manager?<br />

Managers of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> limited partnership funds<br />

Performance record<br />

Ability <strong>to</strong> add value <strong>to</strong> portfolio companies (past, present and future)<br />

Deal sourc<strong>in</strong>g ability (past, present and future)<br />

Process established<br />

Exit ability/experience<br />

Experience/commitment/motivation of key executives<br />

Investment strategy fits with your requirements<br />

Evidence of ability <strong>to</strong> move with chang<strong>in</strong>g market conditions <strong>to</strong> ensure future returns<br />

Flexibility - is the m<strong>in</strong>imum/maximum <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment permitted <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with your needs?<br />

Distribution policies - are distributions managed so that <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs can obta<strong>in</strong> cash, thus elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the need for them <strong>to</strong> take on the task of manag<strong>in</strong>g distributions?<br />

Fees and terms<br />

Report<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

Gatekeeper/fund of funds manager<br />

Performance record<br />

Proven ability <strong>to</strong> access the best <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers. The better <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds are often<br />

oversubscribed and access can be by <strong>in</strong>vitation only<br />

Appropriate diversity across stage, style and geography<br />

Flexibility - is the m<strong>in</strong>imum/maximum <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment permitted <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with your needs?<br />

Distribution policies - are distributions managed so that <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs can obta<strong>in</strong> cash, thus elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the need for them <strong>to</strong> take on the task of manag<strong>in</strong>g distributions?<br />

Fees and terms<br />

Report<strong>in</strong>g methods<br />

What fees are generally charged by a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> manager?<br />

The annual management fee is usually based <strong>in</strong>itially on the amount of capital committed <strong>to</strong> the<br />

fund.<br />

Management <strong>in</strong>centive fees, or carried <strong>in</strong>terest, is usually payable as a proportion of <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r<br />

profits after hurdle rates have been achieved.<br />

Fees levied by <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers are generally higher than for other asset classes. This is<br />

because the sourc<strong>in</strong>g, purchas<strong>in</strong>g, moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g and realisation of <strong>private</strong> companies is more labour<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive per £1 <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed. These higher fees are balanced by higher expected returns. The fees<br />

chargeable will be listed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>private</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g memorandum.<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> fund returns are generally quoted net of all types of fees, which is how returns are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s annual Performance Measurement Survey.


London Bus<strong>in</strong>ess School's key recommendations <strong>to</strong> pension fund<br />

<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

In January 2000, an <strong>in</strong>dependent report was undertaken by London Bus<strong>in</strong>ess School, commissioned<br />

by the <strong>BVCA</strong> and supported by the National Association of Pension Funds, which exam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong> as an asset class for pension fund <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs. Some of the key recommendations made by the<br />

report follow.<br />

• Take a long-term perspective<br />

The decision <strong>to</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> should be taken with a long-term perspective <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d s<strong>in</strong>ce it normally<br />

takes three <strong>to</strong> five years before <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs experience positive returns and net cash flows.<br />

• Be prepared <strong>to</strong> make higher nom<strong>in</strong>al fund allocations<br />

Usually a maximum of 80% - 95% of an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r's committed capital is drawn down. Inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

should be prepared <strong>to</strong> make higher nom<strong>in</strong>al fund allocations <strong>to</strong> this asset class <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong><br />

achieve their target exposure. Commonly, only around 60% of an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r's <strong>to</strong>tal commitment<br />

is outstand<strong>in</strong>g at any one time.<br />

• Appo<strong>in</strong>t a dedicated <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund manager<br />

Managers of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> portfolios should be subjected <strong>to</strong> different organisational<br />

procedures from the managers of marketable security portfolios.<br />

The assessment of track records and selection of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms - skills that have a<br />

large impact on the returns of a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> portfolio - require an expertise which is quite<br />

different from analys<strong>in</strong>g public <strong>equity</strong> markets. London Bus<strong>in</strong>ess School suggests that pension<br />

funds appo<strong>in</strong>t exclusive <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers and subject them <strong>to</strong> different <strong>in</strong>centive and<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />

• A well-structured portfolio<br />

A well-structured <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> portfolio has attractive cash flow implications. Initially it<br />

will require net contributions over several years. After this period, such a portfolio should<br />

generate positive net cash flows for a longer period.<br />

• Growth <strong>in</strong> the secondary market<br />

The grow<strong>in</strong>g secondary market has led <strong>to</strong> a substantial improvement <strong>in</strong> the liquidity of the<br />

<strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

• Diversify between funds and managers<br />

Diversification between funds and managers smooths cash flows and can reduce the spread of<br />

returns. (Details of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms can be found on the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s website at<br />

www.bvca.co.uk and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>BVCA</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>ry of Members.)


Frequently asked questions and answers<br />

What size is the <strong>in</strong>dustry?<br />

Over £60 billion has been <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed by UK <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms <strong>in</strong> over 25,000 companies between<br />

1984 and 2003.<br />

Over £67 billion has been raised by <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds from 1988 <strong>to</strong> 2003.<br />

Market capitalisation of venture and development capital <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trusts <strong>to</strong>talled £6 billion <strong>in</strong><br />

September 2003.<br />

"Captive" <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds - those owned and only obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g funds from their parent<br />

organisations (such as banks or <strong>in</strong>surance companies), accounted for 6% of 2003's <strong>to</strong>tal UK<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment.<br />

<strong>How</strong> liquid is <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> practice?<br />

Technically, <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trusts are unable <strong>to</strong> distribute realised ga<strong>in</strong>s, but <strong>in</strong> practice liquidity is<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>ed through their quotation. As with all quoted shares, this is subject <strong>to</strong> general constra<strong>in</strong>ts on<br />

marketability, such as the size of the hold<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Individual limited partnerships are unquoted, but are self liquidat<strong>in</strong>g and distribute realised ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />

and dividends <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs dur<strong>in</strong>g the life of the fund. It may be noted that because these funds<br />

draw down capital <strong>in</strong> several tranches and make periodic distributions, commonly only a maximum<br />

of 60% of an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r's <strong>to</strong>tal commitment is outstand<strong>in</strong>g at any one time.<br />

Typical <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund cash flow<br />

(Commitment = 100)<br />

Source: Westport Private Equity Limited<br />

Are <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment returns under downwards pressure?<br />

The size and number of some funds raised, particularly recently, have made press headl<strong>in</strong>es. It is<br />

worth not<strong>in</strong>g, however, that most of these are larger buy-out funds with a pan-European rather<br />

than purely UK focus. The cont<strong>in</strong>ental European market is less mature than that <strong>in</strong> the UK.<br />

A well-structured fund, run by a good manager with strong pric<strong>in</strong>g discipl<strong>in</strong>es that prevents<br />

overpayment, should be able <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the higher levels of returns.<br />

Your adviser should know the <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment policies of the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds and their potential<br />

returns.


What sort of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds are available for <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment?<br />

See the section on "Methods of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>" which will give you some po<strong>in</strong>ters.<br />

Different pension funds will have different requirements and resources.<br />

Should <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment be <strong>in</strong> more than one fund?<br />

A portfolio of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments may be advisable <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> give a spread, as with<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> any other asset class. This can be achieved either by <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more than one fund<br />

or by <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a fund of funds.<br />

Why <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>?<br />

With suitable diversification, you can achieve long-term superior returns.


Appendix 1 - Private <strong>equity</strong> terms and def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

The term "<strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>" is the term generally used <strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>to</strong> cover the <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole,<br />

both buy-outs and venture capital. "Venture capital" is a subcategory cover<strong>in</strong>g the seed <strong>to</strong><br />

expansion stages of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment. Private <strong>equity</strong> describes <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments <strong>in</strong> unquoted companies<br />

often accompanied by the provision of loans and other capital bear<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>equity</strong> type risk. Below<br />

are descriptions of the different stages of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment.<br />

Types of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

Buy-<strong>in</strong> management buy-out (BIMBO)<br />

Provision of <strong>equity</strong> capital <strong>to</strong> enable a company's management <strong>to</strong> acquire the bus<strong>in</strong>ess they manage<br />

with the assistance of some <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g management.<br />

Institutional buy-out (IBO)<br />

Provision of <strong>equity</strong> capital <strong>to</strong> enable a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm <strong>to</strong> acquire a company, follow<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

the <strong>in</strong>cumbent and/or <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g management will subscribe for or otherwise acquire a stake <strong>in</strong> the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Management buy-<strong>in</strong> (MBI)<br />

Funds provided <strong>to</strong> enable an external manager or group of managers <strong>to</strong> buy <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a company.<br />

Management buy-out (MBO)<br />

Funds provided <strong>to</strong> enable current operat<strong>in</strong>g management and <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> acquire an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

product l<strong>in</strong>e or bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Public <strong>to</strong> <strong>private</strong> (PTP)<br />

The purchase of all of a listed company's quoted shares us<strong>in</strong>g a special purpose vehicle funded with<br />

a mixture of debt and unquoted <strong>equity</strong>.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g bank debt<br />

To replace or reduce a company's level of gear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Replacement capital<br />

Equity capital which allows exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> buy back, replace or redeem their<br />

sharehold<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Rescue/turnaround<br />

To provide <strong>equity</strong> <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance a company <strong>in</strong> difficulties or <strong>to</strong> rescue it from receivership.<br />

Secondary purchase<br />

Purchase of exist<strong>in</strong>g shares <strong>in</strong> a company from another <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm. This is often done when<br />

a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> manager wishes <strong>to</strong> sell his stake <strong>in</strong> a company <strong>to</strong> allow him <strong>to</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d down a mature<br />

fund at the end of its life, or from another shareholder or shareholders.<br />

Venture capital<br />

• Seed<br />

Provision of <strong>equity</strong> capital <strong>to</strong> allow a bus<strong>in</strong>ess concept <strong>to</strong> be developed, perhaps <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

production of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan, pro<strong>to</strong>types and additional research, prior <strong>to</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g a product<br />

<strong>to</strong> market and commenc<strong>in</strong>g large-scale manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Start-up<br />

F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g provided <strong>to</strong> companies for use <strong>in</strong> product development and <strong>to</strong> fund their <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g. Companies may be <strong>in</strong> the process of be<strong>in</strong>g set up or may have been trad<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />

short time, but may not have sold their product commercially.<br />

• Other early stage<br />

Provision of <strong>equity</strong> capital <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiate commercial manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and sales <strong>in</strong> companies<br />

which have completed the product development stage, but may not yet be generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

profits.


• Expansion<br />

Provision of <strong>equity</strong> capital <strong>to</strong> grow and expand an established company. For example, <strong>to</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>creased production capacity, product development, market<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

additional work<strong>in</strong>g capital. Also known as "development" or "growth" capital.<br />

Terms of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

Carried <strong>in</strong>terest or carry<br />

Equivalent <strong>to</strong> a performance fee, this represents the share of a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund's profit that will<br />

accrue <strong>to</strong> the general partners (also see "Hurdle rate").<br />

Committed funds or raised funds<br />

Capital committed by <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs. Cash <strong>to</strong> the maximum of these commitments may be requested or<br />

drawndown by the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> managers usually on a deal-by-deal basis. This amount is different<br />

from <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed funds for three reasons. Firstly, most partnerships will <strong>in</strong>itially <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> only between<br />

80% and 95% of committed funds. Second, it may be necessary <strong>in</strong> early years <strong>to</strong> deduct the annual<br />

management fee which is used <strong>to</strong> cover the cost of operation of a fund. Third, payback <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

usually beg<strong>in</strong>s before the f<strong>in</strong>al draw down of commitments has taken place.<br />

Distributions<br />

These are payments <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs after the realisations of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments made by partnership.<br />

Exits, divestments or realisations<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs generally receive their pr<strong>in</strong>cipal returns via a capital ga<strong>in</strong> on the sale or<br />

flotation of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments. Exit methods <strong>in</strong>clude a trade sale (most common), flotation on a s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

exchange (common), a share repurchase by the company or its management or a ref<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess (least common). Secondary purchases of the company by another <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firm are<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly common phenomenon.<br />

Draw downs<br />

These are payments <strong>to</strong> the partnership by <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments. Funds are<br />

usually drawn down from <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs on a deal-by-deal basis.<br />

Funds of funds<br />

These are funds whose pr<strong>in</strong>cipal activity consists of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds. Inves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong><br />

funds of funds can thereby <strong>in</strong>crease their levels of diversification.<br />

Gatekeepers<br />

These are specialist advisers who assist <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> their allocation decisions <strong>to</strong> <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong>.<br />

General partners<br />

These are the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms, who select <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments, structure deals, moni<strong>to</strong>r <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments<br />

and design the appropriate exit strategies on behalf of the limited partners.<br />

Hurdle rate<br />

This is the m<strong>in</strong>imum return <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> be achieved before a carry is permitted. A hurdle rate of<br />

10% means that the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund needs <strong>to</strong> achieve a return of at least 10% per annum before<br />

the profits are shared accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the carried <strong>in</strong>terest arrangement.<br />

Interim return<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al rate of return of a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment can, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, only be calculated when<br />

all <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments are sold and the fund is wound up. Most return calculations therefore produce<br />

<strong>in</strong>terim IRRs which are close <strong>to</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al rate of return after approximately three <strong>to</strong> six years. This<br />

convergence period is usually shorter for buy-out funds than for early stage and development funds.<br />

Internal rate of return (IRR)<br />

The IRR method is the most appropriate method for calculat<strong>in</strong>g the returns of a <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> fund.<br />

In essence, the IRR represents the rate at which positive and negative cash flows are discounted so<br />

that the net present value of the fund amounts <strong>to</strong> zero. It is not consistent with the time weighted


eturn (TWR) used for other components of a scheme's <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment portfolio and care should be<br />

taken <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g comparisons.<br />

Investment stage<br />

In this publication, the term <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment stage refers <strong>to</strong> the fund's <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment preferences. In<br />

accordance with the cut-offs used for the <strong>BVCA</strong>'s annual Performance Measurement Survey, funds<br />

were divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>:<br />

• Early stage funds - <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> companies <strong>in</strong> the seed (concept), start-up (with<strong>in</strong> three years<br />

of a company's establishment) and early stage of development;<br />

• Development funds - <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> expansion stage companies, for example, established<br />

companies which raise <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>to</strong> make acquisitions, fund work<strong>in</strong>g capital, buy new<br />

plant, etc. Also small management buy-outs (MBOs) and buy-<strong>in</strong>s (MBIs) with less than £10m of<br />

<strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed;<br />

• Mid MBO funds - <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> MBOs and MBIs with £10m-£100m of <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed;<br />

• Large MBO funds - <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> MBOs and MBIs with more than £100m of <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed;<br />

• Generalist funds - <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> companies at a variety of stages of development.<br />

Limited partnerships<br />

In limited partnerships, <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs generally constitute the limited partners and <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong> firms act as general partners.<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment considered by many <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms usually amounts <strong>to</strong> 1% of the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal funds be<strong>in</strong>g raised. The maximum <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment usually accepted from a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r<br />

corresponds <strong>to</strong> about 10% of the <strong>to</strong>tal fund size. The majority of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

between 10 and 30 limited partners.<br />

A limited partnership usually has a life fixed <strong>in</strong>itially at 10 years dur<strong>in</strong>g which the general partners<br />

select <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments, structure deals, moni<strong>to</strong>r <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments and design the appropriate exit strategies<br />

on behalf of the limited partners. The partnership's funds will usually be <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed by the general<br />

partners with<strong>in</strong> three <strong>to</strong> five years. Despite be<strong>in</strong>g set up with an <strong>in</strong>itial life of 10 years, many funds<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> exist beyond that period because some <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments will not be fully realised with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended life of the fund. When all <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments are fully divested, a limited partnership can be<br />

term<strong>in</strong>ated or "wound up".<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> funds<br />

Managed by <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms who raise funds from external sources, such as pension funds,<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance companies and others. There are over 200 such funds managed by <strong>BVCA</strong> members. For<br />

the pros and cons of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment - see the section on "Methods of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>".<br />

Secondary market<br />

The secondary market enables <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> buy and sell stakes <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds whilst it is<br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Trade sale<br />

This is the sale of the <strong>equity</strong> share of an <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ee company <strong>to</strong> another company.<br />

Venture and development capital <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment trusts<br />

Quoted <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> funds that <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong> "a significant portion of [their] ...portfolio <strong>in</strong> the securities<br />

of unquoted companies" (def<strong>in</strong>ition: Association of Investment Trusts). There are around 20<br />

managed by <strong>BVCA</strong> members. For the pros and cons of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment - see the section on "Methods of<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong>".


Appendix 2 - The economic role of the UK <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Funds <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ed by <strong>BVCA</strong> members<br />

£ millions<br />

Source: <strong>BVCA</strong><br />

The UK <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is the largest and most developed <strong>in</strong> Europe - account<strong>in</strong>g for 47% of<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal annual European <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> 2003 - and is second only <strong>to</strong> the USA <strong>in</strong> world<br />

importance. The <strong>in</strong>dustry's impact on Europe is shown through the <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments undertaken by <strong>BVCA</strong><br />

members' UK offices <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> overseas companies. Not <strong>in</strong>cluded, however, are those <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments made<br />

by <strong>BVCA</strong> members' offices based overseas. These are grow<strong>in</strong>g rapidly as local contacts and networks<br />

are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly seen as important <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g an active <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

For companies <strong>in</strong> which <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ments are made, it marks the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of a<br />

relationship that generally will span three <strong>to</strong> seven years or more.<br />

Private <strong>equity</strong> firms not only commit funds, but also contribute their extensive experience,<br />

contacts and advice <strong>to</strong> companies <strong>in</strong> which they <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>. This <strong>in</strong>put was rated highly by <strong>private</strong><br />

<strong>equity</strong> backed companies <strong>in</strong> recent research.<br />

The <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry has a crucial role <strong>to</strong> play <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g and help<strong>in</strong>g create successful<br />

enterprises <strong>in</strong> the UK. In a major <strong>in</strong>dependent survey of the economic impact of <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

the UK, it was demonstrated that over a four year period:<br />

• Private <strong>equity</strong> backed companies create more jobs<br />

Over the five years <strong>to</strong> 2003/4, <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> backed companies <strong>in</strong>creased their staff levels<br />

at a rate of just over five times that of FTSE 100 companies and three times that of the<br />

companies <strong>in</strong> the FTSE 250.<br />

The number of people employed <strong>in</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> backed companies <strong>in</strong>creased by 20% p.a.,<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st a national growth rate of 0.6% p.a. It is estimated that companies that have received<br />

<strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> account for the employment of around 2.7 million people, equivalent <strong>to</strong> 18%<br />

of the current <strong>private</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r workforce.<br />

• Private <strong>equity</strong> backed companies boost the UK economy<br />

On average, over the five years <strong>to</strong> 2003/4, <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> backed companies <strong>in</strong>creased their:<br />

- sales by 23% p.a., or twice as fast as FTSE 100 companies;<br />

- exports by 20% p.a., compared with a national growth rate of 3.3%;<br />

- <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment by 5% p.a. compared with a national <strong>in</strong>crease of 1.9%.<br />

• 81% of the companies could not have existed or would have grown less rapidly without<br />

<strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

• Over three-quarters of the companies felt that the <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> firms had made a major<br />

contribution <strong>in</strong> addition <strong>to</strong> the provision of money.<br />

Other major contributions cited by <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> backed companies <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><br />

firms be<strong>in</strong>g used as a sound<strong>in</strong>g board for ideas, challeng<strong>in</strong>g the status quo, for their f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

advice, guidance on strategic matters and their contacts and market <strong>in</strong>formation.


The UK <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> prove its resilience by anticipat<strong>in</strong>g and shap<strong>in</strong>g<br />

economic developments. Whatever the <strong>in</strong>dustry's achievements, we are not complacent. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>to</strong> evolve with new areas and methods of <strong><strong>in</strong>vest</strong>ment <strong>to</strong> ensure that returns <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs and management teams cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be maximised. There is much evidence that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> expand its <strong>in</strong>fluence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!