16.08.2013 Views

Effect of surface radiation on RBC in cavities heated from below

Effect of surface radiation on RBC in cavities heated from below

Effect of surface radiation on RBC in cavities heated from below

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1462 M.A. Gad, C. Balaji / Internati<strong>on</strong>al Communicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Heat and Mass Transfer 37 (2010) 1459–1464<br />

Fig. 2. Change <strong>in</strong> Nusselt number with respect to Rayleigh number for a square cavity.<br />

variati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> Nusselt numbers with Rayleigh<br />

number for different values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> side wall. Fig. 4 (a)<br />

shows that <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> results <strong>in</strong> a reducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong><br />

comp<strong>on</strong>ent. With an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewalls, the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> comp<strong>on</strong>ent decreases except for Rayleigh number <strong>in</strong> the<br />

range 10,000–50,000. However, <strong>in</strong> general <str<strong>on</strong>g>surface</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> leads to<br />

an overall <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the heat transfer across the cavity. Three<br />

different regimes are observed <strong>in</strong> the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Rayleigh number<br />

(Ra) <strong>from</strong> 5×10 3 to 10 5 . The emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the side walls has a<br />

negligible effect <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>vective heat transfer <strong>in</strong> the range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Rayleigh number 4000bRab10,000. It is observed that flow structure<br />

changes <strong>from</strong> unicellular to bicellular for 10,000bRab50,000 and a<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>vective heat transfer occurs for a<br />

higher emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the horiz<strong>on</strong>tal sidewall. For RaN50,000, the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> is suppressed significantly with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the side walls. For the case where <str<strong>on</strong>g>surface</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is<br />

not c<strong>on</strong>sidered, unicellular soluti<strong>on</strong>s are found to exist. So, Rayleigh–<br />

Benard c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> has a tendency to produce unicellular flow<br />

structure. When <str<strong>on</strong>g>surface</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is c<strong>on</strong>sidered, for Rayleigh number<br />

10,000 to 50,000 a bicellular flow structure is obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Figs. 5 and 6<br />

show the streaml<strong>in</strong>es and isotherms for Rayleigh number 30,000 and<br />

90,000 when ε=0.85 (the maximum value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the stream functi<strong>on</strong> is<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ed at the appropriate streaml<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the figure).<br />

4.2.2. Heat transfer for higher aspect ratio <strong>cavities</strong><br />

Fig. 7 (a) and (b) show the variati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> Nusselt numbers for a cavity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> aspect ratio 2, for different<br />

Rayleigh number, Ra<br />

4400<br />

4100<br />

3800<br />

3500<br />

3200<br />

2900<br />

2600<br />

2300<br />

2000<br />

1700 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Aspect ratio<br />

= 0<br />

= 0.1<br />

= 0.5<br />

= 0.85<br />

Fig. 3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewalls <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> for <strong>cavities</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

different aspect ratios.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> Nusselt number, NuC<br />

b<br />

Radiati<strong>on</strong> Nusselt number, NuR<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5<br />

Rayleigh Number, Ra x10-4 5.00<br />

4.75<br />

4.50<br />

4.25<br />

4.00<br />

3.75<br />

3.50<br />

0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5<br />

Rayleigh Number, Ra x10-4 Rayleigh numbers and emissivities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewalls. For the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

cavity with AR=2, <strong>on</strong>ly bicellular soluti<strong>on</strong> is found to exist<br />

irrespective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewalls. The observati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

made <strong>in</strong> the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bicellular flow structure for a square cavity are<br />

also valid for this case i.e. an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>vective heat transfer<br />

and a decrease <strong>in</strong> the radiative heat transfer with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewalls. Fig. 8 (a) and (b) show the stream functi<strong>on</strong><br />

and isotherms respectively when the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sidewall is 0.85<br />

and the Rayleigh number is 75,000. For the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> aspect ratio 3, for<br />

the pure c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> case, tri-cellular flow structure is found to exist<br />

while for the case where <str<strong>on</strong>g>surface</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is c<strong>on</strong>sidered for Rayleigh<br />

number greater than 10,000, tetra-cellular flow structure is found to<br />

= 0<br />

= 0.10<br />

= 0.50<br />

= 0.85<br />

= 0.10<br />

= 0.50<br />

= 0.85<br />

Fig. 4. Variati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> (a) c<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> and (b) <str<strong>on</strong>g>radiati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> Nusselt number with Rayleigh<br />

number for different values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the emissivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the horiz<strong>on</strong>tal side walls (AR=1).<br />

1.5 x10 -4<br />

303 K<br />

315 K<br />

Fig. 5. (a) Streaml<strong>in</strong>es and (b) isotherms for Ra =30,000 and ε=0.85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!