16.08.2013 Views

Bahrain - What is GIS

Bahrain - What is GIS

Bahrain - What is GIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bahrain</strong> Role of contractual arrangements in improving health system performance<br />

The day after the closing date, the bids are opened by the Tender Board in the presence<br />

of bidders.<br />

All the bids are l<strong>is</strong>ted on a d<strong>is</strong>play board showing the price quoted by each bidder.<br />

Each page of these bids <strong>is</strong> stamped and punched with the Government logo so that no<br />

pages can be added later.<br />

All the bids are handed over to the contracting Min<strong>is</strong>try, i.e. the Min<strong>is</strong>try of Health in<br />

th<strong>is</strong> case, for evaluation.<br />

The bids are carefully studied by the Directorate of Medical Equipment for<br />

completeness and to determine whether the bids meet the Min<strong>is</strong>try of Health<br />

specifications.<br />

The findings are then presented to the Tender Evaluation Committee, which compr<strong>is</strong>es<br />

members of the Directorate of Finance, Directorate of Materials Management and<br />

Directorate of Medical Equipment.<br />

The committee makes final recommendation for award of the contract to a bidder.<br />

Various factors considered by th<strong>is</strong> committee include prices quoted, ability of the<br />

contractor to meet requirements, contractor’s past h<strong>is</strong>tory of reliability, Min<strong>is</strong>try’s<br />

past experience with the contractor etc.<br />

The recommendation of the Tender Evaluation Committee <strong>is</strong> then sent to the Min<strong>is</strong>ter of<br />

Health for approval. Once it <strong>is</strong> approved by the Min<strong>is</strong>ter, the award of contract <strong>is</strong><br />

sent to the Tender Board for their final approval. After receiving the approval<br />

from the Tender Board, the contract <strong>is</strong> awarded to the selected contractor.<br />

The contract <strong>is</strong> then signed between the Min<strong>is</strong>try and the contractor.<br />

The format of the contract <strong>is</strong> standard, as approved by the Min<strong>is</strong>try and Finance and<br />

National Economy.<br />

In both case studies, the selection was based on bid price as well as on the<br />

quality of technical proposal. No scoring criteria were used for bidders’ proposals.<br />

Involvement of an expert third party (Tender Board) ensures transparency and fairness<br />

of the selection process. The competitive bidding process used was successful in<br />

keeping the cost of the contracts low (controlling bidding price).<br />

Contract management and implementation <strong>is</strong>sues<br />

Linking contracts to tangible results<br />

Although detailed specifications and requirements were built into the equipment<br />

maintenance contract, no tangible achievement outcomes were specified in either case<br />

study. There was no performance bonus included in the contracts which could<br />

motivate contractors to improve their outputs.<br />

Duration of contract<br />

Both contracts were of short duration (2 years), which will help avoid monopoly<br />

with regard to future contracts. However, in the contractual arrangements for<br />

incineration of medical waste, a 10-year contract was signed because of the huge<br />

investment made by the contractor for equipment [12].<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!