16.08.2013 Views

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sense <strong>of</strong> who she was. Initially, she narrated I-as Indian as an identity story when explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> macro-context <strong>of</strong> relatedness which was pushed to <strong>the</strong> background but <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

arranged marriages she took up a variability emphasis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> I-as<br />

American born Indian who desires to reconcile <strong>the</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong> not be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

choice <strong>of</strong> whom to marry. In this case she <strong>in</strong>tegrated both I-as Indian/American toward<br />

construct<strong>in</strong>g identity. This k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> position<strong>in</strong>g reflects what Robertson (1995) calls<br />

―glocalization‖ (cited <strong>in</strong> Hermans & Hermans-Konokpa, 2010, p.23): an <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

two or more cultural values <strong>in</strong>to a coherent construction <strong>of</strong> self and identity.<br />

Generally <strong>the</strong>re is a need to explore <strong>the</strong> multiple sites <strong>of</strong> identities constructed at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

<strong>of</strong> cultures (Bhatia, 2002; Bhatia & Ram, 2001; Hermans & Kempen, 1998; Lugones, 1994).<br />

This facet is important to this study as it provides <strong>the</strong> framework for understand<strong>in</strong>g how<br />

<strong>Catholic</strong> religious sisters who live at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface <strong>of</strong> cultures (African culture versus religious<br />

culture) negotiate <strong>the</strong> different culture I-positions. Moreover, Hermans (2004) expresses that<br />

―cultural actions and <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> identities take place not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‗middle‘ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

dwell<strong>in</strong>g but <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact zones between nations, peoples, and locales‖ (p.306).<br />

4.13 The Self: Globalisation and <strong>Identity</strong><br />

Globalisation <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased movement <strong>of</strong> goods, services, technology, ideas and<br />

people has real social and economic consequences (Baylis & Smith, 2002; Held & McGrew,<br />

1999; Manners, 2000) but above all it <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> identity construction both<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual and society at large (Hermans, 2004; Hermans & Hermans-Konokpa,<br />

2010). The dialogical self describes that spatial and temporal process <strong>of</strong> position<strong>in</strong>g is nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

‗here‘ nor ‗<strong>the</strong>re‘; thus <strong>the</strong> self‘s ‗I‘-positions are ―distributed <strong>in</strong> a spatial world‖ (Hermans,<br />

2002, p.298). Like a traveller, <strong>the</strong> self located <strong>in</strong> a global world (post-modernity) takes a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> perspectives where some positions are opened and o<strong>the</strong>rs closed <strong>of</strong>f. The<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!