16.08.2013 Views

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

Identity Construction of Roman Catholic Religious Sisters in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The evidence <strong>of</strong> this shift<strong>in</strong>g position is portrayed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contradictory position<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

reflects ―I-as accept<strong>in</strong>g religious life as my new family‖ versus ―I-as-not sure that religious<br />

life is my family‖. Directly or <strong>in</strong>directly this portrays <strong>the</strong> participants‘ performance <strong>of</strong><br />

identity as persons who may not be happy <strong>in</strong> religious life. Such performance <strong>of</strong> identity is<br />

thought provok<strong>in</strong>g, bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that it emerges as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants‘ social<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> religious life. This is at variance with <strong>the</strong> ideal discourse <strong>of</strong> religious life as<br />

Christ‘s family (cf. Jn. 13:34, 15:12). To a large extent <strong>the</strong>se discrepancies between <strong>the</strong><br />

discourses <strong>of</strong> supportive versus oppressive family to describe religious life prefigures <strong>the</strong><br />

participants‘ report <strong>of</strong> power relations and dom<strong>in</strong>ance which will be discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next<br />

section. In addition <strong>the</strong>se discrepancies also reflect <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants‘ identification with<br />

Africa‘s cultural characteristics <strong>of</strong> love, care and hospitality which <strong>the</strong>y claim is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lived reality <strong>of</strong> religious life.<br />

7.3 The Participants‘ Oppressed <strong>Identity</strong> Conveyed through <strong>Religious</strong> Obedience Used as<br />

Means <strong>of</strong> Power Relations/Dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

In this study most participants‘ major dilemma <strong>of</strong> identity construction is located with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

context <strong>of</strong> religious obedience. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Church‘s discourse <strong>the</strong> religious who vows<br />

obedience sacrifices her entire will to God and by faith is expected to subject herself to those<br />

who hold God‘s place, <strong>the</strong> authority figures (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g formators/superiors, senior/older<br />

sisters) (PC #14). The dilemma is that <strong>the</strong> discourse <strong>of</strong> religious obedience is ambiguous. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> one hand obedience is focused on do<strong>in</strong>g God‘s will which <strong>in</strong>volves collective listen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and discernment <strong>of</strong> what God wills (Can. 509–601; CICLSAL, 2007; DDL const. Art.45–51;<br />

PC #4, 14; SHCJ const. #34–39). This collective discernment is <strong>in</strong>terpreted by some<br />

participants to mean that each member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community is consulted with and allowed to<br />

express her op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> matters that concern her as an <strong>in</strong>dividual and <strong>the</strong> community<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!