19.08.2013 Views

Identifying Stored-Grain Insects Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Identifying Stored-Grain Insects Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Identifying Stored-Grain Insects Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

February 1999 DOWELL ET AL.: NIR IDENTIFICATION OF INSECT SPECIES 169<br />

occurring at the CH 3 overtones (1,130 and 1,670 nm)<br />

supports the conclusions indicated by the PLS factors.<br />

Thus, each insect species appears to have molecules<br />

with unique vibrational characteristics that may be<br />

caused by the unique mixture of hydrocarbon molecules<br />

and other lipid classes.<br />

Spectra of the chitin hexamer and ground insect<br />

cuticle had absorbance peaks around 1,400Ð1,500 nm.<br />

Neither the correlation plots nor the factor weight<br />

plots indicated that this wavelength range was useful.<br />

Thus, it appears that the NIR system may have detected<br />

differences in cuticular lipids between species,<br />

but that the chitin within the cuticle did not contribute<br />

to classiÞcations. Other compounds contained in<br />

insect cuticle that could be contributing to classiÞcation<br />

include protein, catachols, pigments, and oxalates<br />

(Kramer et al. 1995).<br />

When classifying Þeld insects using calibrations developed<br />

from laboratory stock colonies, 100% of the C.<br />

ferrugineus were correctly classed as secondary insects<br />

and in the correct genus. The A. advena were not<br />

included in the original calibration; however, 80%<br />

were correctly classed by the model as secondary<br />

insects. For the R. dominica, 67% were correctly<br />

classed as primary insects. Of the R. dominica correctly<br />

classed as primary, 83% were placed in the correct<br />

genus. Of those placed in the correct genus, 100% were<br />

placed in the correct species. The calibration developed<br />

using laboratory colonies appears to classify Þeld<br />

insects with reasonable accuracy, especially considering<br />

that the conÞguration for illuminating and viewing<br />

insects had changed between the original calibration<br />

and subsequent testing of Þeld insects.<br />

<strong>Insects</strong> that enter traps can be counted electronically<br />

(Shuman and Weaver 1996). However, integration<br />

of Þltered NIR sensors within an insect trap could<br />

provide an automated means of not only counting the<br />

trapped insects but also identifying the insect to type<br />

or species. This type of timely information concerning<br />

pest insect populations in stored grain would certainly<br />

be an advantage when implementing control strategies.<br />

Computer vision, which uses digitized images from<br />

cameras and provides information about object color,<br />

shape, and size, could provide an alternate means of<br />

identifying insect species. Although computer vision<br />

could likely be integrated into an insect trap, it poses<br />

additional problems of proper lighting, shadows, insect<br />

presentation, image segmentation (Zayas and<br />

Flinn 1997).<br />

In summary, our results showed that NIR spectroscopy<br />

coupled with PLS or neural network spectral<br />

analysis techniques can be used to classify the 11 insect<br />

species examined in this study, with primary and secondary<br />

insects being classed with 99% accuracy. The<br />

unique composition of cuticular lipids in the different<br />

beetles may be partially responsible for the classiÞcations<br />

achieved with this system. Although we were<br />

not able to classify all tested insects to the species level<br />

with high accuracy, identiÞcation to species is not<br />

necessarily required for making pest management decisions<br />

in grain storages. IdentiÞcation to genus or<br />

identiÞcation as a primary or secondary pest is usually<br />

sufÞcient. In addition to stored grain insects, we believe<br />

that this technology could be used for rapid,<br />

automated identiÞcation of many other organisms.<br />

References Cited<br />

Baker, J. E., S. M. Woo, D. R. Nelson, and C. L. Fatland.<br />

1984. OleÞns as major components of epicuticular lipids<br />

of three Sitophilus weevils. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B<br />

77: 877Ð884.<br />

Dowell, F. E., J. E. Throne, and J. E. Baker. 1998. Automated<br />

nondestructive detection of internal insect infestation of<br />

wheat kernels using near-infrared reßectance spectroscopy.<br />

J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 899Ð904.<br />

Flinn, P. W., and D. W. Hagstrum. 1990. <strong>Stored</strong> grain advisor:<br />

a knowledge-based system for management of insect<br />

pests of stored grain. AI Applications Nat. Res. Manage.<br />

4: 44Ð52.<br />

Galactic Industries. 1996. Grams/32 userÕs guide, version 4.0.<br />

Galactic, Salem, NH.<br />

Gibbs, A., and J. H. Crowe. 1991. Intra-individual variation in<br />

cuticular lipids studied using fourier transform infrared<br />

spectroscopy. J. Insect Physiol. 37: 743Ð748.<br />

Hecht-Neilsen, R. 1989. Neural computing. Addison-Wesley,<br />

New York.<br />

Kramer, K. J., T. L. Hopkins, and J. Shaefer. 1995. Applications<br />

of solids NMR to the analysis of insect sclerotized<br />

structures. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25: 1067Ð1080.<br />

Lockey, K. H. 1988. Lipids of the insect cuticle: origin, composition<br />

and function. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 89:<br />

595Ð645.<br />

Murray, I., and P. C. Williams. 1990. Chemical principles of<br />

near-infrared technology, pp. 17Ð34. In P. C. Williams<br />

and K. H. Norris [eds.], <strong>Near</strong>-infrared technology in the<br />

agricultural and food industries. American Association of<br />

Cereal Chemists. St. Paul, MN.<br />

NeuralWare. 1995. Reference guide. NeuralWare, Pittsburgh,<br />

PA.<br />

Ridgway, C., and J. Chambers. 1996. Detection of external<br />

and internal insect infestation in wheat by near-infrared<br />

reßectance spectroscopy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 71: 251Ð264.<br />

Shuman, D., and D. Weaver. 1996. Innovations in electronic<br />

monitoring of stored-grain insects, pp. 57Ð1 to 57Ð4. In<br />

Proceedings, Annual International Research Conference<br />

On Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions,<br />

4Ð6 November 1996, Orlando, FL. Methyl Bromide<br />

Alternatives Outreach, Fresno, CA.<br />

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1986. <strong>Stored</strong>-grain insects.<br />

U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Res. Serv. Agric. Handb. 500.<br />

Zayas, I. Y., and P. W. Flinn. 1997. Detection of insects in<br />

bulk wheat samples with machine vision, paper no.<br />

973149. Presented at the Annual American Society of<br />

Agricultural Engineers meeting, 10Ð14 August 1997, Minneapolis,<br />

MN, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.<br />

Received for publication 3 February 1998; accepted 22 September<br />

1998.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!