20.08.2013 Views

History and Philosophy of Science - University of Pittsburgh Press

History and Philosophy of Science - University of Pittsburgh Press

History and Philosophy of Science - University of Pittsburgh Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE NEW<br />

2012 • 312 pp.<br />

978-0-8229-4416-4 • Cloth • $65.00<br />

ITEM NO. 510 • SALE PRICE $52.00<br />

eBook available<br />

Peeling Potatoes or<br />

Grinding Lenses<br />

Spinoza <strong>and</strong> Young Wittgenstein<br />

Converse on Immanence <strong>and</strong> Its Logic<br />

ArIStIDeS bAltAS<br />

“In Aristides Baltas’s widely learned <strong>and</strong> bracingly<br />

surprising interpretation, God for Spinoza <strong>and</strong> Logic<br />

for Wittgenstein emerge as specific expressions <strong>of</strong><br />

the human need for an absolute authority from<br />

whose point <strong>of</strong> view the whole <strong>of</strong> reality or language<br />

can be understood <strong>and</strong> evaluated at once. Spinoza<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wittgenstein emerge, in turn, as implacable enemies<br />

<strong>of</strong> any such authority <strong>and</strong> make common<br />

cause against its claims to legislate what can be<br />

thought, valued, <strong>and</strong> done. Controversial <strong>and</strong> fascinating,<br />

the book is bound to provoke intense discussion<br />

<strong>and</strong>—more important—serious thought.”<br />

—Alex<strong>and</strong>er Nehamas, Princeton <strong>University</strong><br />

“It is fascinating to watch Baltas carefully, precisely,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in loving detail erect his argument from the historical<br />

texts <strong>and</strong> then defend it in his inimitable elegant<br />

fashion. This is a book to dwell in with<br />

enormous rewards. I recommend it wholeheartedly.”<br />

—George Gale, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Missouri-Kansas City<br />

“I can work best now while peeling potatoes. . . .<br />

It is for me what lens-grinding was for Spinoza.”—L. Wittgenstein<br />

More than 250 years separate the publication <strong>of</strong> baruch Spinoza’s Ethics <strong>and</strong> ludwig<br />

Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. both are considered monumental<br />

philosophical treatises, produced during markedly different times in human<br />

history, <strong>and</strong> notoriously challenging to interpret. In Peeling Potatoes or Grinding Lenses, Aristides<br />

baltas contends that these works bear a striking similarity based on the idea <strong>of</strong> “radical<br />

immanence.” each purports to underst<strong>and</strong> the world, thought, <strong>and</strong> language from the inside<br />

<strong>and</strong> in a way leading to the dissolution <strong>of</strong> all philosophy. In that guise, both <strong>of</strong>fer a powerful<br />

argument against fundamentalism <strong>of</strong> all sorts <strong>and</strong> kinds.<br />

to Spinoza, God is just nature. God is not above or separate from the world, humanity,<br />

or mere objects for, as nature, He inheres in everything. to Wittgenstein, logic is not above<br />

or separate from language, thought, <strong>and</strong> the world. the hardness <strong>of</strong> the logical “must” inheres<br />

in states <strong>of</strong> affairs, facts, thoughts, <strong>and</strong> linguistic acts. outside there are no truths or sense—<br />

only nonsense.<br />

through close readings <strong>of</strong> the texts based on lessons drawn from radical paradigm change<br />

in science, baltas finds in both works a single-minded purpose, implacable reasoning, <strong>and</strong> an<br />

austerity <strong>of</strong> style that are rare in the history <strong>of</strong> philosophy. He analyzes the structure <strong>and</strong> content<br />

<strong>of</strong> each treatise, the authors’ intentions, the limitations <strong>and</strong> possibilities afforded by scientific<br />

discovery in their respective eras, their radical opposition to prevailing philosophical<br />

views, <strong>and</strong> draws out the particulars, as well as the implications, <strong>of</strong> the arresting match between<br />

the two.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PRESS • <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!