Crookes Valley Park_Ponderosa_Philadelphia greenspace.pdf
Crookes Valley Park_Ponderosa_Philadelphia greenspace.pdf
Crookes Valley Park_Ponderosa_Philadelphia greenspace.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Masterplan<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
Prepared for <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside by the Environmental Planning Team.<br />
November 2010.
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens are<br />
three green spaces in the <strong>Crookes</strong>/ Netherthorpe/ Upperthorpe<br />
area of Sheffield. They form a green corridor in this<br />
neighbourhood, linking up to a further green space and important<br />
visitor attraction, Weston <strong>Park</strong>. The ‘<strong>Crookes</strong>moor <strong>Park</strong>s’ have<br />
seen various improvements over the past 10 years, but there has<br />
never been a strategic plan for the parks in order to guide their<br />
regeneration and development. This Masterplan has been<br />
produced to assist in ensuring the best possible future for all of the<br />
parks, and also to ensure they link up with the newly restored<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong> and the smaller green spaces in the vicinity. The aim<br />
is to provide an overall strategy and vision for the neighbourhood’s<br />
environment, and offer complementary facilities for local residents<br />
and visitors.<br />
Initial consultation was carried out prior to the masterplanning<br />
document being produced to find out about the key issues in the<br />
area, what local peoples’ needs are, and to study the current use<br />
of the three parks, including linking them with Weston <strong>Park</strong>. This<br />
consultation has been key to the masterplanning process, along<br />
with historical and heritage information, ecological data and<br />
neighbourhood data. These reports are included as appendices<br />
to this document.<br />
During the production of the document itself, further consultation<br />
was held with the stakeholders regarding the detailed proposals.<br />
The report highlights the potential and problems of all three parks<br />
and, based on these and the outcomes of the consultation, a<br />
series of proposals are made for each park to establish possible<br />
projects, both small and large scale, for the future. Quick wins are<br />
then identified and budget costs are provided for all the proposals.<br />
1<br />
Environmental Planning Team
2<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Contents<br />
1.0 Introduction to the sites<br />
2.0 Brief<br />
1.1 Location Plan<br />
1.2 Introduction to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
1.3 Introduction to <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
1.4 Introduction to <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
3.0 Project Team and Consultation<br />
4.0 Background<br />
4.1 Land Ownership and Planning Context<br />
4.2 Social and Ethnic context<br />
5.0 <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
5.1 Problems and potential<br />
5.2 Masterplan Proposals<br />
5.3 Priorities<br />
5.4 Costs<br />
• <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> masterplan<br />
6.0 <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
6.1 Problems and potential<br />
6.2 Masterplan proposals<br />
6.3 Priorites<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
cont.
3<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.4 Costs<br />
• <strong>Ponderosa</strong> masterplan<br />
7.0 <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
7.1 Problems and Potential<br />
7.2 Masterplan Proposals<br />
7.3 Priorities<br />
7.4 Costs<br />
• <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens Masterplan<br />
8.0 Smaller Green Spaces<br />
9.0 Appendices<br />
1. Land Ownership<br />
2. Additional Project Information.<br />
• Crimean War Memorial for <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
• <strong>Ponderosa</strong> Football specification<br />
• Boathouse feasibility for <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
3. ‘Art in the <strong>Park</strong>’ Reports<br />
• Consultation report<br />
• ‘Mini Green Spaces Celebrations’ report<br />
4. Stakeholder Consultation Summary<br />
5. Minutes of the meeting regarding improvements for events on<br />
the <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
6. <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> - minutes from meetings regarding<br />
fishing in the lake<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
1.0 Introduction to the sites<br />
1.1 Location Plan of <strong>Park</strong>s and Open Spaces included in the Masterplan<br />
4<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
1.2 Introduction to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Base taken from GOOGLE maps<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a City <strong>Park</strong>, managed by Sheffield City Council, <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
and Countryside Service. It is situated in a prime location, close to the city<br />
centre, next to Weston <strong>Park</strong>, opposite Sheffield University and near Sheffield<br />
Hospitals. It currently has facilities which include accessible paths, playground<br />
facilities, two bowling greens and a fishing lake. It is home to an area of<br />
unimproved grassland, a priority in the cities Biodiversity Action Plan, and to<br />
woodland, which is approximately 100 years old. A wide variety of birds live in<br />
and visit the park, including long tailed tits, thrushes and waxwings.<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is historically important, and there are several historical<br />
features on site which have been considered and treated sympathetically<br />
within the masterplan.<br />
This park is dominated firstly by the lake which covers approximately one third<br />
of the area, and secondly by the dramatic landform surrounding it. The<br />
5<br />
Environmental Planning Team
6<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
ground slopes down steeply on all four sides to the lake. Three sides are<br />
similar to the original landform remoulded down to what was a reservoir, and<br />
the fourth slope is a more recent man-made embankment constructed to carry<br />
trams along <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road (see historical context below). This slope<br />
includes terraces and a level area where bowling greens and a play area are<br />
located.<br />
The layout of the park is mainly formal echoing the rectangular form of the<br />
lake.<br />
This is a very popular park, the creative consultation event indicated that<br />
people mainly use the park to relax and sit down, as a route to other places<br />
and for exercise. Bird watching and the play area are also important<br />
attractions. It is generally seen as a welcoming and well maintained space.<br />
P&C have worked in partnership with the Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
regarding the design and procurement of an island in the lake. This will have<br />
advantages for both the bird life and fishing on the lake. Construction of the<br />
island has recently been completed.<br />
Historical Context<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> was once open moorland, known as <strong>Crookes</strong> Moor. In 1791<br />
the Sheffield Enclosure Act divided up the moor into parcels of land, to be<br />
rented out to local farmers. Originally, there were wells and troughs that<br />
provided water. In 1785 an order was granted to commission the creation of a<br />
constant water supply, this allowed for construction of The Old Great Dam in<br />
1785. It was the largest dam, in a chain of ten, stretching from Ralph’s Dam<br />
(now University car parks) down to smaller reservoirs in what is now the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>. These with the Whitehouse Dams in Walkley were the first large<br />
reservoirs to supply the growing town of Sheffield. were gradually abandoned<br />
and developed into a few large residencies.<br />
Although at the time it was expected that the Old Great Dam, holding 21<br />
million gallons, would supply all the future needs of Sheffield, the population<br />
of Sheffield grew rapidly in the 18 th century, increasing from 10,000 in 1780 to<br />
50,000 by 1810 and it was soon too small.<br />
The Great Dam is the only one of these reservoirs remaining. At the back of<br />
the Dam, emerging from the hillside can be seen the early stone arched<br />
culvert which still feeds water into the reservoir.<br />
The Dam House is by far the oldest building in the area, built in the 1795 it<br />
apparently started life as the Water Company Solicitor’s house. In the 19 th<br />
century it was the home of the Hunter family (descendants of the local<br />
antiquarian Joseph Hunter) and later as occupied by waterworks and <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
staff and their families.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
7<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
In 1881, the company leased the Great Dam and immediate surroundings to<br />
the Sheffield Corporation for public use. Under the 1887 Act, the City Council<br />
acquired the assets of the Sheffield Water Company.<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Recreation Ground was laid out as part of the construction of<br />
the <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road viaduct in 1899. Before that there were steep<br />
slopes down from Winter Street then up the other side to Barber Road. The<br />
viaduct was built to allow trams to continue up to Walkley. Terraced areas<br />
were built up to either side of the viaduct and these were set out as two formal<br />
recreation grounds, one to each side of the road, mirroring each other.<br />
The Bowling Greens were laid out soon after the Recreation Ground opened,<br />
and has remained very popular. The <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Bowls Club is now a<br />
private club open to the public and pays the city council for upkeep of the<br />
greens. Tennis courts were added in 1907 on the site of one of the bowling<br />
greens. A pavilion and public conveniences were added in 1930.<br />
In 1951 as part of the Festival of Britain, the land around the Great Dam was<br />
added to the <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Recreation ground to form the new <strong>Crookes</strong><br />
<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. The reservoir was adapted for use as a boating and angling lake<br />
and thirty rowing boats were introduced. The Dam House became the<br />
Festival Restaurant and tea garden before suffering almost complete<br />
destruction by fire and total refit in 2005 to form the current pub-restaurant.<br />
In 1968, the tennis court was converted into a children’s playground that is still<br />
in use. Use of the lake was extended to the University of Sheffield sub aqua<br />
club in 1970/71 and a motor launch service. In 1985, high cost and low<br />
demand led to the demise of the motor launch service, however rowing boats<br />
remained on the lake until 1991.<br />
The playground has seen a number of improvements in the last 10 years<br />
many of them funded by the efforts of the Friends Group. The railings<br />
incorporate artwork by local schoolchildren from Westways who also helped<br />
artist Jason Thompson to carve the wooden benches.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
8<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
Recreation Ground<br />
c1900<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
Recreation Ground<br />
c1900
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Remaining historical features:<br />
9<br />
The lake still dominates the<br />
park<br />
Arched culvert, the historic<br />
feed to the reservoir<br />
Inspection shaft<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
1.3 Introduction to <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
Base taken from GOOGLE maps<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> is a large District park managed and owned by SCC <strong>Park</strong>s and<br />
Countryside. Although Weston <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Ponderosa</strong> all<br />
meet at the junction on <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road/ Mushroom Lane, <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
feels very isolated from the other two parks due to the barrier of the road and<br />
the dense woodland at the top of the park.<br />
This park lies in the valley bellow the embankment of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road.<br />
The main contrast within the park is the enclosed woodland character at the<br />
top with densely wooded slopes to three sides and the open, close mown<br />
grassland with trees at the bottom running down to Upperthorpe Road<br />
At the lower end of the park, the landform appears quite natural with gentle<br />
slopes, whilst towards the top there is the obviously engineered football pitch<br />
which sits rather incongruously in the landform. Above the football pitch there<br />
is also, though due to its tree cover, less visible, the steeply engineered slope<br />
10<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
of the viaduct. In fact, very little of the landform of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> is natural.<br />
Much of the land below the football field was previously covered in housing,<br />
as was the wooded slope below Mushroom Lane. (See also Historical Context<br />
below).<br />
The lower slopes of the park are dominated by the six tower blocks situated<br />
within the park to the west.<br />
The path layout at the bottom of the park, which in part is overlaid on the<br />
previous road layout is formal and rather conflicts with the gentle landform.<br />
Presently the path network is poor, with many paths poorly surfaced or<br />
overgrown with vegetation. Due to the dense vegetation and the enclosed<br />
spaces at the top of the park, visitors have reported that they often feel unsafe<br />
in this area. There are steep wooden steps leading down into the park from<br />
the south east, which are not suitable for the disabled and are both a health<br />
and safety and maintenance liability. The football pitch was constructed on a<br />
former landfill site without a drainage system and has very little topsoil,<br />
consequently it is now not possible to hire this facility out as it is often<br />
waterlogged and the amount of stone that lies on the surface makes it<br />
dangerous to play on.<br />
The top end of the park is heavily wooded, with a wide variety of woodland<br />
species, including oak, wild cherry, beech, hawthorn and rowan (to name a<br />
few). In 1994, the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> Environmental Group carried out a series of fruit<br />
tree planting sessions. The site has a nature walk running through the trees<br />
and is a great area for bird life.<br />
The masterplan closely considers the recommendations from the ecological<br />
survey and incorporates these to ensure that habitats are further enhanced for<br />
wildlife.<br />
Historical Context<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> was once part of the <strong>Crookes</strong> Moor. It had three ponds at the time<br />
of the construction of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>s Great Dam.<br />
The land was acquired by the Sheffield Corporation in 1887.<br />
From the 18 th Century, sandstone quarries were worked to the south of the<br />
Great Dam; these were gradually abandoned and developed into a few large<br />
residencies.<br />
By 1900, the lower three quarters of the site was developed as the Port<br />
Mahon housing estate. This estate was demolished in the 1960’s, during the<br />
redevelopment of the Upperthorpe and Netherthorpe Areas.<br />
In 1899, the embankment at the southern extent of the park was created and<br />
laid out as formal recreation grounds (as noted in regard to the creation of<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Recreation Ground above) following on from the creation of<br />
the tramway route along <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road.<br />
11<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Brick rubble was tipped on the ‘<strong>Ponderosa</strong>’ site, which raised the ground level.<br />
The <strong>Park</strong> was officially named ’the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>’ in the 1970’s after a popular<br />
television show.<br />
In the 1980’s the football pitch was constructed and the steep slopes including<br />
those on the embankment were planted with woodland trees. All that remains<br />
of the layout of the formal recreation ground are the steps and terraces<br />
The <strong>Ponderosa</strong> remained very informal in character until SRB funding in 2001<br />
resourced improvements. This enabled the installation of a formal path<br />
network, new entrances, and a climbing rock and zip wire. Moreover, it<br />
allowed a community art project to take place, generating interest and<br />
involvement by local people and children in this very important site. Since<br />
2008 it has also featured the annual festival, Peace in the <strong>Park</strong>, which attracts<br />
people from a city wide arena, proving very successful and raising money for<br />
charity.<br />
12<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
Formal recreation ground on<br />
slopes of viaduct c. 1900<br />
View of Port Mahon housing<br />
estate from <strong>Crookes</strong> Moor Road
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
13<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
1990 the recently installed<br />
football pitch and tree planting in<br />
the foreground
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
1.4 Introduction to <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
Base taken from GOOGLE maps<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens provide a green link between the residential areas of<br />
Upperthorpe, Langsett and Infirmary Road. It is a green space, owned and<br />
largely managed by Sheffield Homes.<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside manage the toddler play area on the edge of the site.<br />
There is also a basketball court, youth shelter and skate boarding ramp,<br />
providing facilities for young people in the area. There are a range of local<br />
businesses close by and excellent tram and bus links.<br />
The majority of this park is situated on a steep hillside with dense woodland<br />
with paths linking the various play and sports features. A small flat area at the<br />
14<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
bottom of the slope houses the main play area. And a levelled area on the<br />
slope has a basketball court. This park has a very informal layout, relating<br />
directly to the sloping landform and there is no formal enclosure to the park<br />
with very low key entrances.<br />
This site holds exciting design potential in terms of the topography and<br />
changing levels and has also seen recent positive activity as a result of Art in<br />
The <strong>Park</strong> engaging with local young people and creating colourful murals<br />
around the basketball court. The site does however present several design<br />
challenges in terms of:<br />
15<br />
• Linking together the very disconnected parts of the site.<br />
• Creating a park that feels safe and designs out opportunities for anti<br />
social behaviour and illegal activity (the current network of paths, along<br />
with the overgrown nature of the woodland copses and meadow areas<br />
may contribute to this influx of anti-social behaviour)<br />
• Creating a face and identity to the <strong>Park</strong>. Besides neighbouring<br />
properties, very few people are aware of <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
existence due to poor entrances and gateways into the site.<br />
Historical context<br />
This green space is situated on the site of the old Kelvin Flats, built in the<br />
1960’s and demolished in the 1990’s. They were replaced with family housing,<br />
whilst retaining the green space which once served the flats. With its many<br />
mature trees, this space was developed into <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens.<br />
Kelvin flats<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Photo GOOGLE Maps<br />
16<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
Remnants of environmental<br />
improvements to the flats in<br />
the 1980’s can be seen in the<br />
paving on Cleveland Street<br />
bordering the park<br />
Current housing on the site of<br />
Kelvin Flats adjacent to<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
2.0 Brief<br />
Drawn up by Sheffield City Council’s [SCC] <strong>Park</strong>s & Countryside Service, the<br />
brief was to produce a high quality landscape Masterplan and A4 report for<br />
the three identified parks which:<br />
17<br />
• Creates a vision for future development<br />
• Links the 3 parks with the Weston <strong>Park</strong> branding as neighbourhood<br />
green spaces<br />
• Enhances the green links potential for the neighbourhood<br />
• Enhances the different strengths of each park and produce solutions<br />
to any inherent weaknesses<br />
• Attracts further funding for implementation of the proposals<br />
• Prioritises the proposals and suggests quick wins.<br />
• Provides budget costs for the proposals<br />
The brief also requires the masterplan to:<br />
• Be sympathetic to the masterplanning and branding of recently<br />
renovated Weston <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• Use the consultation results provided by the Consultation Team as an<br />
important tool to help reach solutions and to guide design.<br />
• Use the results from the commissioned ecological report to reach<br />
solutions and guide design.<br />
• Be aspirational, innovative and creative<br />
• Reflect the landscape character of the neighbourhood, heritage of the<br />
parks and ecological value.<br />
• Address Green Flag criteria in the designs focussing in particular on<br />
conservation & heritage, community involvement, accessibility and<br />
making the green spaces a welcoming place to visit.<br />
• Take into consideration long-term management, maintenance and<br />
sustainability issues.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
18<br />
• Liaise with <strong>Park</strong>s & Countryside Trees and Woodlands Officers<br />
regarding tree survey, woodland management plans and tree condition<br />
surveys.<br />
• Explore and identify green routes in order to enhance accessibility<br />
between the three sites and Weston <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
3.0 Project Team and Consultation<br />
Art in the <strong>Park</strong> were commissioned to carry out consultation with the local<br />
community to find out what local people thought about the three parks. As part<br />
of this consultation process Art in the <strong>Park</strong> (Sheffield) ran 3 creative art events<br />
in the parks, handed out over 500 questionnaires, attended a family event at<br />
Netherthorpe Primary School and led the consultation at a public stakeholders<br />
meeting. From the questionnaires we had 167 responses of which most<br />
people were from S11, S10, S6 and S3. We had 48 responses from children.<br />
13 people used <strong>Philadelphia</strong>, 95 used <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and 59 used <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong>.<br />
In addition to this, a Masterplan Steering Group was set up and identified<br />
stakeholders and interested local members of the community were invited to<br />
attend. Representatives from The Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor <strong>Park</strong>s played a key<br />
role in this group The Steering Group met on several occasions throughout<br />
the process and were in email contact between times, and performed a key<br />
role in evaluating consultation, discussing issues, and agreeing priorities and<br />
projects.<br />
The Regeneration Officer also carried out targetted consultation with key<br />
stakeholders in the area through attending various meetings and giving<br />
presentations/engaging in discussion/ handing out questionnaires. These<br />
stakeholders included:<br />
• Walkley Forum<br />
• Upperthorpe TARA<br />
• <strong>Crookes</strong> and Upper Walkley TARA<br />
• Martin & Oxford Street Tower Blocks Tenants Association<br />
• Springvale & Amos TARA<br />
• St Stephens TARA<br />
• Langsett and Walkley Community Association<br />
• <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Bowling Club<br />
• Sheffield University Canoe Club<br />
• Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet; 'Education through Angling' project<br />
• Woodthorpe Development Trust 'Get Hooked on Fishing'<br />
• ‘Education through Angling’, Abbeydale Industrial Hamlets<br />
• Sheffield Homes<br />
• Netherthorpe, Upperthorpe, Langsett, Walkley Community Safety Group<br />
• ZEST<br />
• Peace in the <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Weston <strong>Park</strong> Museums & Galleries<br />
• No Limits Film Festival<br />
• Councillors<br />
• <strong>Ponderosa</strong> Environment Group<br />
• Sheffield Bird Study Group<br />
• SPRITE<br />
19<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
There has also been some interest in forming a ‘Friends of <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens’ group. It is hoped that this process will encourage the group to<br />
formalise and take an active role in the future development of the green<br />
space.<br />
Public participation and community consultation was seen as a key priority in<br />
developing a meaningful Masterplan which acknowledged the public’s<br />
priorities, fears and desires and considered all the comments and suggestions<br />
made.<br />
A full summary of the consultation processes and findings is included in<br />
Appendix 3 (Art in the <strong>Park</strong> Consultation Report) and Appendix 4<br />
(Stakeholder Consultation Summary)<br />
Art in the <strong>Park</strong> also carried out a 'Minispace Greenspace Celebrations' event<br />
in July 2010 at some of the smaller incidental green spaces around the Three<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s. The aim was to encourage people to come and use these green<br />
spaces a little more and try and find out how they could be improved in the<br />
future. The full report is included in Appendix 3 and makes suggestions about<br />
how future projects could enhance the green spaces in the future for the local<br />
community.<br />
20<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
4.0 Background<br />
4.1 Land Ownership and Planning Context<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is wholly in <strong>Park</strong>s ownership.<br />
The majority of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> is owned by parks, however the land around<br />
the tower blocks is owned in part by Sheffield Homes and in part by Estates.<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens owned by Sheffield Homes apart from small areas of<br />
Highways land near the play area.<br />
The full land ownership maps for all three parks are included in Appendix 1<br />
4.2 Social and Ethnic context<br />
From analysing datasets provided by the Office for National Statistics, key<br />
observations can be drawn from the results:<br />
• Student population: very high in the Broomhill ward (49.61%) and much<br />
lower in the Walkley ward (9.41%)<br />
• The high student population in Broomhill affects many other characteristics<br />
of the neighbourhood including a high number properties rented from<br />
private landlord or letting agency (26.97% as opposed to 11.32% in<br />
Walkley ward)<br />
• There is a higher Percentage of people in Broomhill ward achieving Level<br />
3 and Level 4 qualifications (Level 3: 42.77% and Level 4: 34.53%) than in<br />
Walkley ward (Level 3: 8.63% and Level 4:26.96%). There is a much<br />
higher number of people in Walkley ward with no qualifications (28.83%)<br />
which contrasts with the Broomhill population (6.71%)<br />
• In both wards people have higher than Sheffield average health (77.30%<br />
in Broomhill, 66.06% in Walkley, 65.23% in Sheffield overall)<br />
• In terms of ethnic groups, Broomhill has a more diverse population with<br />
10.40% of the population belonging to a BME group, higher than Walkley's<br />
BME population of 4.47%.<br />
As the information is taken from the 2001 census, the figures have to be<br />
viewed with a degree of caution but give a relatively accurate picture of the<br />
current situation. This information, along with other observations about the<br />
neighbourhood have been taken into consideration through the<br />
masterplanning process to ensure that the designs and proposals are<br />
appropriate to the area and the community that live here.<br />
21<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
5.0 <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
5.1 Potential<br />
22<br />
Attractive space, well looked after and popular.<br />
The lake dominates the park covering one third<br />
of its area and is fundamental to the historical<br />
character of the park. Although it is a very<br />
attractive feature on a sunny day, it can be<br />
rather empty, bleak and depressing in the<br />
winter and when the skies are grey. Its<br />
potential should be maximised by adding more<br />
visual interest and bringing people on to the<br />
water as much as possible. The presence of<br />
water offers great potential to create wetland<br />
habitats and for offering more visual interest,<br />
recreational and educational potential.<br />
The landform creates a dramatic setting with<br />
steep slopes down to the lake<br />
Some areas of recent planting make the<br />
entrance adjacent to Weston <strong>Park</strong> attractive<br />
and welcoming and spring bulbs under the trees<br />
are spectacular.<br />
The presence of woodland on the south east<br />
boundary provides an attractive backdrop to the<br />
lake.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
23<br />
There are some great views across the<br />
lake from the terraces on the North East<br />
side of the park, these could be improved.<br />
There is fascinating history to the park,<br />
however there is little interpretation. Great<br />
potential to improve this aspect of the park<br />
The water, woodland and slopes provide<br />
some interesting habitats although there is<br />
a great deal of potential to improve these.<br />
There are several very popular facilities,<br />
the bowling greens, the restaurant and<br />
play area. The latter is however poorly<br />
integrated into the landscape and lacks<br />
any planting.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
24<br />
The entrances are rather low key and<br />
uninteresting. There is potential to<br />
improve the attractiveness of the park by<br />
upgrading these<br />
-Main entrance onto <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
Road<br />
-Entrance onto Mushroom lane<br />
The lakeside pavilion is currently unused<br />
and in need of repairs<br />
There is also the very active and<br />
committed Friends group<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
5.2 Problems<br />
25<br />
The park is dominated by steep slopes<br />
with poor accessibility in some areas.<br />
Some of the flights of steps do not have<br />
handrails.<br />
There are very limited flat areas. Apart<br />
from the lake, the bowling greens and play<br />
area, the only flat areas are the terraces<br />
below <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road and the<br />
restaurant terrace. This limits potential.<br />
Generally the hard landscape in the park is<br />
a bit run down. Some of the tarmac paths<br />
are worn out as are the steps and many of<br />
the seats. Also many of the stone retaining<br />
walls are in poor repair. They need repointing<br />
and their copings have been<br />
replaced with concrete slabs fixed with<br />
steel straps which are unsightly. The jetty<br />
on the lake is also in poor repair.<br />
Similarly, many of the planting beds are<br />
dull and declining.<br />
There is poor parking provision as the<br />
lease with the university, for weekday<br />
access, has expired.<br />
Although there are public toilets adjoining<br />
the Dam House Restaurant, these are not<br />
currently available to the public.<br />
Much of the historical interest is now<br />
missing, for example, the cannon and<br />
statue which once stood on the terrace are<br />
missing and there is little information about<br />
what remaining.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
26<br />
There is poor linkage to Weston <strong>Park</strong> and<br />
the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>. There is poor visibility up<br />
Mushroom Lane for pedestrians crossing<br />
and heavy traffic on <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road.<br />
The route from Mushroom Lane is hidden<br />
and the steps are in poor repair with no<br />
handrail.<br />
There has been a recent spate of vandalism<br />
Maintenance areas are unsightly and<br />
scattered around the park<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
5.3 Design Principles<br />
The key principles underlining the strategy were to:<br />
27<br />
1) Encourage more people to use the park<br />
2) Give the park a facelift.<br />
3) Improve accessibility<br />
4) Enhance the historic nature of the park.<br />
5) Develop its character, less formal than Weston <strong>Park</strong> and more so than<br />
the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> with more colourful ornamental planting<br />
6) Encourage new uses for the lake<br />
7) Improve habitats<br />
8) Improve existing recreational, sports and play facilities<br />
9) Encourage a through route.<br />
10) Involving Community Groups and local schools in the regeneration<br />
works.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
5.4 Early actions prior to further design work:<br />
1) Levels utilities surveys.<br />
2) Feasibility study for use of lakeside pavilion.<br />
3) Feasibility of pedestrian priority across Mushroom Lane and a<br />
pedestrian crossing over <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> to<br />
be discussed with Highways.<br />
4) <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside to pursue the parking agreement with<br />
Sheffield University<br />
5) <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside to negotiate with Dam House manager re<br />
repairs necessary to re-open the toilets.<br />
6) Consider a feasibility study for reducing the depth of the water in the<br />
lake to increase recreational opportunities.<br />
7) Investigate the requirements for Sunday market.<br />
28<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
5.6 Masterplan Proposals<br />
All proposals are made in the light of information available at the time of<br />
writing and are not set in stone. They represent a balanced overview of the<br />
future direction of the <strong>Park</strong> taking account of all the constraints and<br />
opportunities described.<br />
Please note that although an attempt has been made to list the proposals in<br />
order of priority, this is likely to change as the availability of funding changes<br />
over time.<br />
Planning permission may be required for some of these proposals and this<br />
should be investigated and taken into account as and when proceeding with<br />
future design work.<br />
1) Improving the lake habitat<br />
o Islands<br />
In line with the recommendations in the ecological survey, the proposal for<br />
building an island in the lake is being progressed. The main aim is to provide<br />
nesting sites for birds. The recent depth survey of the lake has located the<br />
shallower areas which could possibly provide locations for permanent islands<br />
built off the bottom rather than the earlier proposal for floating islands. There<br />
is funding in place to build a permanent island later this year.<br />
o Planting<br />
Also in line with the ecological report and the consultation report, native<br />
marginal and aquatic plants introduced in the shallower areas would soften<br />
the edges of the lake as well as improving its habitat. These should be<br />
designed with care so as not to create too great a maintenance burden.<br />
Cost estimate: £18,000<br />
2) Improve Fishing in the lake<br />
Encouraging fishing in the lake in line with both the consultation report and the<br />
ecological report would enhance and further develop the recreational potential<br />
of the Lake and footfall in the <strong>Park</strong>. Construction of fishing platforms should<br />
be installed along the edge to prevent obstruction of the path around the lake<br />
as indicated on the masterplan. Location of the platforms should be an<br />
appropriate distance away from the island.<br />
Developing links with the Woodthorpe Development Trust and the ‘Education<br />
Through Angling’ project based at Abbeydale Industrial Hamlets in<br />
conjunction with the and potential renovation of the boat house would all<br />
contribute to achieving this aim.<br />
Re-stocking the lake is another possibility, however, consultation with the<br />
Environment Agency and angling partners would be necessary if this proposal<br />
were to be acted on.<br />
29<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
The motorboat jetty requires a structural check to ascertain whether repairs or<br />
reconstruction is more appropriate. By extending it to both sides, it would be<br />
provide more space for fishermen.<br />
See also 'Boat house' below and Appendix 6 (Meetings re fishing in the lake)<br />
Cost estimate: £20,000<br />
3) Boathouse<br />
In line with the consultation document, a feasibility study is being undertaken<br />
to look at new sustainable uses for the boathouse. The increasing<br />
deterioration of the structure combined with the results of consultation makes<br />
this project a priority.<br />
Several organisations have expressed an interest in using the building. ‘Art in<br />
the <strong>Park</strong>’, Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet for its ‘Education through Angling’<br />
project and The Woodthorpe Development Trust for its ‘Get hooked on<br />
Fishing’ project are all interested.<br />
The building would require refurbishment and connection/upgrading of<br />
utilities. This work should ensure that it retains its character.<br />
The feasibility study is looking at providing the following facilities in the<br />
boathouse:<br />
• Toilet (this could help meet the public demand for a public toilet in the<br />
park)<br />
• Kitchen/ Tea making facilities<br />
• Classroom/ Office space (ideally two separate rooms- may be sliding<br />
partition)<br />
• Hot Desk Studio/Artist Space<br />
• Heating<br />
• Possible space for a kiosk to sell ice-creams/drinks etc<br />
Volunteers from the University of Sheffield have expressed an interest in<br />
carrying out the re-painting work which would defray some of the<br />
refurbishment costs.<br />
The feasibility report is included in Appendix 2<br />
30<br />
Cost estimate: £126,000<br />
4) Woodland Management<br />
The ecological report suggests producing and implementing a combined<br />
management plan for <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>.<br />
Cost estimate: £1,000<br />
The same report also proposed the following to improve the habitat in the<br />
woodland area:<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
o Improve the ground flora by controlling the ivy and introducing areas of<br />
native woodland plants.<br />
o Removal of non native saplings.<br />
o Replacement of bird boxes and introduction of bat boxes.<br />
o To ensure succession in the woodland, with trees of a wide variety of<br />
ages, new native tree planting should also be included in the management<br />
plan.<br />
It is hoped that much of the labour will be provided by volunteers although<br />
further costings may be identified through the management plan.<br />
5) Tree removal<br />
The masterplan proposes some tree removal to open up views within the<br />
<strong>Park</strong>, to enhance visibility and feeling of safety and to further develop the age<br />
structure of trees in the <strong>Park</strong>. Specifically the masterplan proposes:<br />
o Removal of the overgrown Holly Trees (but retention of the Yew Tree)<br />
to open up views from the lower terrace<br />
o Selective tree removal to allow the development of the new path from<br />
Harcourt Road<br />
o Selective thinning to open up the pathway through the woodland off<br />
Mushroom Lane as consultees identified feeling unsafe in this area<br />
Cost estimate: £10,000<br />
6) Herb Garden<br />
The site of the demolished building could become an herb garden, enclosed<br />
with a low hedge and fencing and with more decorative paving, it would<br />
provide a quiet and fragrant place to sit. The design needs to take account of<br />
the potential for antisocial behaviour in this area which has been a problem in<br />
the past.<br />
Cost estimate: £25,000<br />
7) Signage and interpretation<br />
Improved signage was raised in the consultation document as a priority. The<br />
Masterplan recommends:<br />
o Introducing way signs at the entrances to encourage its use as a<br />
through route, in particular at the small entrance off Mushroom Lane<br />
o Introduce signage to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
o Interpretation of the history of the park. A single sign, possibly near the<br />
lake, highlighting the interesting features such as the lake itself, the Dam<br />
House and the head of the shaft would highlight the historical significance of<br />
this park.<br />
o A nature trail linking <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> with the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> with<br />
interpretation would be a great way to link the two parks.<br />
o All signage to comply with the design palette and where possible<br />
combine signs on the same posts.<br />
Cost estimate: £20,000<br />
31<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
8) Toilets<br />
Reopening the toilets, in the Dam House, to the public is a high priority.<br />
Negotiations should proceed with The Dam House to agree and enforce the<br />
terms and conditions of the lease which are currently not being complied with<br />
(See above re potential for additional toilets in boathouse)<br />
No cost to <strong>Park</strong>s & Countryside<br />
9) Play<br />
In line with the consultation results the play area should be upgraded with<br />
some new equipment and further consultation should be carried out with local<br />
children as to the choice of what equipment would best bring new excitement<br />
and challenge.<br />
Planting a small group of trees within the grass area in the play area would<br />
help integrate the space into the landscape.<br />
If in the future, bowling is not played on the second green, the play area could<br />
be expanded into that space at an additional cost. (not included in cost below)<br />
Cost estimate: £33,000<br />
10) <strong>Park</strong> Entrances and boundaries<br />
The entrances are a key starting point to setting the updated style for the park<br />
design palette. Metal gates and /or archways or other features with artist<br />
designed metalwork, combined with stonework would be appropriate to this<br />
park. The design should be high quality and contemporary, though in keeping<br />
with the historic nature of the park. It could include the name of the park<br />
within the design, and paving around the main entrance could be in a higher<br />
quality material, possibly introducing an area of stone.<br />
The design should also reinforce the hierarchy of the entrances with the main<br />
entrance, adjacent to Weston <strong>Park</strong> on <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road, and slightly<br />
lower key entrances adjacent to Harcourt Road and off the lane to the back of<br />
the Dam House. This latter entrance should be more visible from Mushroom<br />
Lane, and views down to the lake should be opened up by selective removal<br />
of trees along the stepped path. (cost included in ‘Tree Removal’)<br />
If the vehicle access for bowlers and disabled park users is to be via the<br />
current maintenance entrance (see below), the main entrance design should<br />
incorporate this, making allowance for a left turn for cars into the park from<br />
Mushroom Lane which is currently one way.<br />
The boundary on <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road would be significantly upgraded with<br />
new metal railings, designed to be in keeping with the entrances.<br />
Cost estimate: £135,000<br />
32<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
11) Pedestrian priority to <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
Encouraging easy pedestrian access between the three parks at the junction<br />
of Mushroom Lane and <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road, has been raised as a key<br />
element of the Masterplan. These are both issues which will require the<br />
involvement of Sheffield City Council Highways Design, who have been<br />
contacted for comments.<br />
No cost to <strong>Park</strong>s & Countryside<br />
12) Resurface paths and reconstruct steps<br />
A full reconstruction of a section of the path to the back of the Dam House will<br />
be necessary to bring it up to standard. Elsewhere, such as on the terraces, a<br />
new wearing course may suffice.<br />
Reconstruction of all the steps within the park, possibly using granite or<br />
‘Conservation’ Kerbs, with a single style would greatly improve their<br />
appearance as well as reducing the necessary repairs. The steps through the<br />
woodland to Mushroom Lane in particular would benefit from reconstruction.<br />
Handrails should be incorporated into all steps.<br />
Cost estimate: £111,000<br />
13) Replacing seats<br />
Replace the seats which have been removed as highlighted in the<br />
Consultation document and continue the programme for replacing all the<br />
remaining old ones. Additional seating around the proposed planting on the<br />
north east bank of the lake would also be in line with the consultation. See<br />
the Design Palette for a suggested style.<br />
Cost estimate: £9,000<br />
14) Retaining walls<br />
Dwarf retaining walls which are in a poor condition should be re-pointed (or<br />
reconstructed where necessary) with stone copings resin bonded to prevent<br />
removal. This would replace the metal straps, now starting to weaken, and<br />
concrete copings.<br />
Cost estimate: £17,000<br />
15) Planting<br />
It has been proposed that the new style of planting recently introduced at the<br />
main entrance, should be continued through the park with the use of colourful<br />
herbaceous plants with shrubs. This would make a huge impact on the<br />
attractiveness of the park for visitors. Year round interest could be provided<br />
with perhaps some areas focusing on the different seasons. Some specific<br />
areas could be developed as gardens.<br />
o Harcourt Road entrance<br />
Small areas of similar planting to that at the main entrance would link the two<br />
entrances.<br />
33<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
o The curved slope below the Dam House terrace would be an ideal<br />
location and including some ornamental trees to provide shade for spring<br />
flowered azaleas, camellias and Japanese maples under-planted with spring<br />
bulbs, and herbaceous plants such as hellebores. This planting could also<br />
provide spectacular autumn colour. The trees would frame the views of the<br />
lake from the terrace and from the opposite bank the bright splashes of colour<br />
would liven up the rather bland view.<br />
o The path set back from the north-west bank of the lake would provide a<br />
wonderful opportunity to continue this mixed style of planting. The beds<br />
between the two parallel paths could be reshaped by combining some of the<br />
beds. Light shade could be introduced in this area with more ornamental trees<br />
between these beds replacing some of those lost.<br />
o Winter interest could be enhanced around the proposed new<br />
accessible path past the bowling building, and around the stepped route at the<br />
Harcourt Road entrance.<br />
o Additional tree planting on the grassy south-east facing slope would<br />
add some interest and provide shade in summer. These trees should be<br />
carefully sited so as not to obstruct the slope for sledging and sunbathing.<br />
Both popular activities here.<br />
o This additional planting would require a commitment to maintenance<br />
and additional ongoing funding for this.<br />
34<br />
o Planting to the herb garden is described and costed above.<br />
Cost estimate: £30,000<br />
16) Improve parking for disabled and bowlers<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing was raised as an issue in the consultation report. Moving the parking<br />
for the bowlers away from the lower terrace would free up the terrace for<br />
pedestrians and allow segregation of vehicles and pedestrians in the park. A<br />
single row of cars along the current maintenance access road adjacent to the<br />
main entrance with a turning head at the bottom, would provide parking in a<br />
much less obtrusive location. This road would have restricted access and<br />
would be solely for maintenance vehicles, disabled and bowlers parking. The<br />
main entrance design should incorporate this, making allowance for a left turn<br />
for cars into the park from Mushroom Lane, which is one way.<br />
The turning head, at the end of the access road, may require the loss of one<br />
of the mature trees in this area, although the design should seek to avoid this<br />
if possible.<br />
The proposed additional path would provide an alternative accessible route<br />
for pedestrians (see below) thus segregating pedestrians and vehicles<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Renewing the agreement for use of the existing car park, close to the Dam<br />
House and owned by Sheffield University should be pursued. This would<br />
provide further disabled and occasional parking with the existing ramped, if<br />
steep, route down to the lakeside around the Dam House terrace.<br />
Cost estimate: £26,000<br />
17) New paths<br />
The proposed new path from the main entrance down towards the lake would<br />
have the advantage of channelling all pedestrians, wheelchairs and people<br />
with buggies through the new entrance rather than, as currently happens,<br />
forcing the latter two groups to use the maintenance road off to one side. This<br />
has no segregation for vehicles and is potentially a hazard for park users.<br />
The new path would be constructed with tarmac and laid out to an accessible<br />
gradient and would be 3m wide.<br />
A further new route, ‘The Woodland Path’, is proposed from the eastern<br />
corner of the lake, it would follow the existing desire line diagonally up the<br />
slope through the woodland to the Mushroom Lane entrance. This is aimed at<br />
encouraging the use of the park as a through route and in keeping with its<br />
woodland character, would be surfaced with bark with timber steps up the first<br />
steep section and would be 1.8m wide.<br />
Consultation evidenced that local people would like to see a new accessible<br />
path from the Harcourt Road entrance into the <strong>Park</strong> to give better access to<br />
the playground with pushchairs and also encourage more people to use the<br />
<strong>Park</strong> as part of their daily routine. At the Harcourt Road entrance, the<br />
gradients preclude a fully accessible route down to the play area below. It<br />
may, however, be possible to construct a new entrance about 20m further up<br />
Harcourt Road and a ramp from here down to the top terrace. This would<br />
allow access for buggies but would probably be too steep for unassisted<br />
wheelchairs. Most of the trees in this area (possibly 8-10no. See tree removal<br />
for costs), would have to be removed to achieve this, although without further<br />
design it wouldn’t be possible to be more exact about numbers. The benefit,<br />
however, would be that once on the top terrace, the proposed accessible path<br />
from the main entrance could then be used to get down to the play area level.<br />
Due to the slope, this path should be only 2m wide.<br />
A full levels survey of the area would be required prior to further design work<br />
on the three new paths.<br />
Accessibility generally can be improved by incorporation of handrails and<br />
tactile paving into all the new stepped routes. (Costs included in Resurfacing<br />
paths and reconstructing steps- see above but not the land survey).<br />
Cost estimate: £59,000<br />
35<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
18) Reducing the depth of the lake<br />
The proposal to reduce the depth of the lake, from its current maximum depth<br />
of 8.6m to 2m, would be a major undertaking. It could, however, have several<br />
benefits for the park in the medium to long term:<br />
o Ecologically, a shallower lake would provide a more useful habitat in<br />
particular for fish. 'Education through Angling' and Woodthorpe Development<br />
Trust have both expressed an interest in developing angling projects in<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Lake and are keen to see the habitat of the Lake improved.<br />
(See also Appendix 6 Minutes from meetings re. fishing in the lake).<br />
o The lake would be safer as shallower water would not be so cold. This<br />
may open up recreational possibilities such as boardwalks, and/ or boating<br />
could be brought back.( see below)<br />
Initial investigation into this project has suggested that the project is not<br />
currently viable due to:<br />
o Current market conditions dictating that hardcore is re-saleable. The<br />
result of this is that no revenue would be generated through this project which<br />
would make the project very costly.<br />
o Estimated environmental impact is significant with an estimated 3244<br />
20 tonne lorry loads of bulk fill (average 12.5 cu.m.) required to reduce the<br />
lake to a depth of 2m. (Estimated total fill required 40,555 cu.m).<br />
We have also enquired as to whether material currently being excavated from<br />
the River Don by the Environment Agency (as part of their river clearance<br />
work) would be a more appropriate fill material (similar from another aquatic<br />
environment with no leaching problems etc). However this too is fraught with<br />
issues of potential contamination with Knotweed, heavy metals and there not<br />
being sufficient excavated volume for a project of this scale.<br />
However, this does not mean that the project should be completely discarded<br />
and it may be appropriate to re-assess the situation in the future if market and<br />
other conditions were to change. Liaison with stakeholders such as the<br />
'Education through Angling' project may also help to find solutions to this<br />
question. If this project is pursued in the future, the masterplan highlights that<br />
the following issues would also need resolving through a full feasibility study:<br />
o Hardcore material would need to be carefully analysed to ensure that it<br />
did not contain such elements as plaster and crushed cement that would<br />
leach into the water and affect the pH and ecology of the Lake. This would<br />
have an impact on fish habitats and biodiversity. An alternative solution to this<br />
would be to bury the demolition materials under a geotextile membrane to<br />
seal the material in, but this would be expensive and there is the danger of<br />
damage/ puncture to the membrane. Topsoil would be required over the<br />
membrane to create a new Lake ecology.<br />
o The structural requirements for filling the lake, both regarding the<br />
additional loading on the dam wall and regarding a safe way to fill with the<br />
necessary compaction.<br />
36<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
o What approvals would be required?<br />
o An Environmental Impact Assessment should be carried out to<br />
investigate such issues as the likely cost and logistics of necessary<br />
infrastructure work to allow vehicles to access the lake, deposit their load, turn<br />
and exit, The cost of reinstatement of the road, dam lakeside wall etc, The<br />
loss of amenity in the park, the likely duration of the work and the opinions of<br />
the Friends, and the general public, what would happen to the existing fish.<br />
o Whether there is sufficient development to provide the volume and<br />
quality of material which would be necessary?<br />
Funding would also have to be in place to pay for the feasibility itself.<br />
In order to encourage more usage of the Lake by groups such as Education<br />
through Angling and WDT, steps can be taken to improve the lake habitat<br />
(see also above: ‘Boat house’ and ‘Improve fishing in the lake’).<br />
No cost as this is not a current proposal<br />
19) Developing more interaction with the lake<br />
o Boating and water garden<br />
Bringing back boating to the lake was raised by the consultation report and<br />
could be a big draw. However, further investigation is needed as to whether<br />
there is interest from a private concern to run such an activity in the <strong>Park</strong><br />
Alternative recreational uses of the water could be included in the study. As<br />
the water covers such a large area of the park, it would be a shame to<br />
exclude the public from a more active involvement. One possibility would be<br />
to create a small water garden area, by introducing a series of interlinked<br />
short boardwalks, maybe in the northern corner. These could enclose some<br />
marginal planting and would either be floating structures, or be built off the<br />
shallower lake bottom. They would of course need to have balustrades to<br />
both sides, and perhaps a metal construction rather than timber could be<br />
designed for durability.<br />
The study would need to include whether either of these options would impact<br />
on the islands as well as the Heath and Safety issues. Zoning of the lake may<br />
be required to avoid conflict between boating and fishing.<br />
(The cost estimate relates to the water garden)<br />
Cost estimate: £17,000<br />
20) Sunday market venue<br />
The proposal to use the upper terrace as a venue for a Sunday market and<br />
other events such as art exhibitions should be investigated further. This was<br />
raised in the consultation document and would be a great draw to the park.<br />
The existing turning circle, however, at the end of the terrace is currently used<br />
as a compost area and would be only just big enough for a car to turn. The<br />
compost could be re-located (see proposal for maintenance area) and the<br />
turning circle would have to be made larger if vans are to use it. (The<br />
minimum diameter for a transit van turning is about 13.3m) This could be<br />
37<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
done by cutting into the bank and incorporating a stone faced retaining wall to<br />
the high side.<br />
The potential problem of parking in the area relating to such events would<br />
have to be included in the study.<br />
Cost estimate: £20,000<br />
21) The lower terrace<br />
There is a lot of potential to improve this terrace. A new home could be found<br />
for the Crimean War Memorial which is currently in storage at the Staniforth<br />
Road Depot and Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet. A considerable amount of<br />
research has been carried out about restoration of the Memorial and<br />
appropriateness of this site (refer to Appendix 2). SCC are currently in<br />
breach of a planning condition that dictates the Memorial should be re-sited in<br />
a prominent City location, but the question remains as to whether SCC can<br />
commit this kind of budget to such a project. The Crimean War Memorial<br />
could be located where the path widens out half way along and new seating<br />
could be provided. Views over the park from this location could be opened up<br />
with some selective thinning of trees and shrubs on the slope below and also<br />
the removal of the group of hollies between the bowling greens which<br />
currently block the views from this key location (this cost is included in ‘tree<br />
removal’). As restoration and installation of this could be very costly, in the<br />
order of £320,000, alternatives could be considered, perhaps a contemporary<br />
sun dial or other sculptural feature.<br />
At the far end of this terrace, there is a space beyond the steps which would<br />
be perfect for a new feature or sculpture. This idea was also raised in the<br />
consultation report.<br />
Cost estimate with Crimean War memorial and sculpture: £375,000<br />
Alternative with sundial and sculpture: £88,000<br />
22) CCTV<br />
A CCTV link with the one in Weston <strong>Park</strong> would reduce the occurrence of<br />
anti-social behaviour and its close proximity to Weston <strong>Park</strong> may reduce the<br />
costs.<br />
Cost estimate: £17,000<br />
23) Enclosure for maintenance area<br />
Currently maintenance areas are dotted about the park with a composting<br />
area at the end of the top terrace a leaf-mold heap on the lower terrace where<br />
it widens out half way along and a skip in a corner near the play area. All are<br />
unsightly and should be grouped together and screened.<br />
The area adjacent to the skip could be adapted and enlarged to the minimum<br />
workable area working around the existing mature trees where ever possible.<br />
It should be fenced with screen planting. Possibly a hedge with weldmesh<br />
fencing or a shrub bed with well designed heavy duty timber fencing and<br />
heavy duty gates. The maintenance area should be repaved with in-situ<br />
38<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
concrete for ease of use by machines. This would create a much more useful<br />
space for the maintenance team.<br />
Cost estimate: £22,000<br />
24) Bowling greens<br />
o Second Bowling Green: Whilst the bowling green is used occasionally<br />
for matches, future use of this Green needs to be monitored as it may be<br />
more appropriate for this area to be developed for alternative use. This needs<br />
to fit in with SCC Bowling Strategy and be reviewed as a city wide level.<br />
Should the second bowling green be decommissioned at some point in the<br />
future, it is important to retain the revenue funding that currently pays for<br />
upkeep of this Green within the <strong>Park</strong> to fund additional maintenance<br />
suggested by the masterplan. Alternative uses of this space could include a<br />
larger playground (perhaps natural play to complement the more traditional<br />
existing equipment), flat space for games, or informal space for picnicking etc.<br />
o Signage on the bowling green to discourage football and other<br />
detrimental activities<br />
o Some improvements, in the form of drainage and irrigation, should be<br />
carried out to the main bowling green would improve this facility. Drainage<br />
was highlighted in the consultation report.<br />
Cost estimate: £12,000<br />
25) Maintenance<br />
o Japanese Knotweed<br />
This weed is present in a couple of locations within the park and should be<br />
controlled or eradicated as raised in the ecological report.<br />
The locations are below the lower terrace (adjacent to the play area) and<br />
adjacent to 17 Harcourt Road.<br />
o North-west bank<br />
Less frequent mowing of this slope could be followed by monitoring of the<br />
indicator species in line with the ecological report.<br />
There is no cost to this proposal<br />
No capital cost<br />
39<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.7 Design Palette<br />
It is felt that the three adjoining parks should retain and enhance their<br />
separate, distinctive characters. The individual character is to a large extent<br />
created by the choice of materials for walls and paving, the design and colour<br />
of railings and items such as seats and bins, and the type and design of<br />
planting as much as by the facilities within the park.<br />
• Entrances and boundaries<br />
The design of metalwork for the entrances and boundaries should be simple<br />
and elegant whilst acknowledging the historic nature of the park<br />
Black rather than green should be chosen for new metalwork. This would<br />
look smarter and fresher than the existing dark green, and contrast with the<br />
colour of the adjacent railings at Weston <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• Seats<br />
Some replacement seats have recently been installed in the park around the<br />
lake. These are generally in keeping with the historic nature of park, however<br />
the seat used with its recycled plastic slats is much less elegant than the<br />
original ones, requiring a central support leg and the plastic being prone to<br />
melting. Perhaps future replacements away from the lake side could be a<br />
design more like the one illustrated with timber slats. These would retain the<br />
elegance of design of the originals whilst providing a robust construction.<br />
New Forest cast iron and<br />
timber seat from Furnitubes<br />
40<br />
Recently installed seats with<br />
recycled plastic slats<br />
• Bins<br />
Back and green ‘Sentinel’ bins have recently been installed. Although a bit<br />
fussy in design, they are in keeping with the character of the park so any<br />
additional bins should match these.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Recently installed ‘Sentinel’ bins<br />
• Paving<br />
Paving should generally be tarmac with simple concrete edgings except for at<br />
the entrances where locally, granite setts or York stone could be incorporated<br />
into the design. The herb garden could also incorporate stone paving. The<br />
proposed woodland walk should be crushed bark.<br />
• Walls<br />
New walls should be stone to match the style of the original<br />
• Signage interpretation boards and way-marking<br />
A family of signage should follow through all three parks. Any metalwork<br />
elements should be painted black for continuity<br />
41<br />
Fitzpatrick Woolmer lectern style display<br />
board which would be suitable for the<br />
historical information board<br />
An example of graphics style which<br />
suitable for information boards<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
42<br />
‘Stylos’ finger post by William Smith<br />
appropriate for both signing directions<br />
within and between the parks.<br />
The posts should be painted black with<br />
white lettering<br />
Timber posts appropriate for way-marking<br />
the trails<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.8 Quick wins<br />
• Lake improvements including installation of the island, vegetating the lake,<br />
fishing platforms and work to the jetty.<br />
• Signage to <strong>Ponderosa</strong>/ Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Interpretation within the <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Reconstruction of steps and installation of handrails on the steep route<br />
down from Mushroom Lane<br />
• Upgrading of the playground<br />
• Feasibility study for and refurbishment of Boat house<br />
• Commission woodland management plan and implement<br />
• Treatment of Japanese knotweed<br />
43<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.9 <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Budget Estimate<br />
See notes re qualifications and exclusions<br />
cont.<br />
44<br />
Description<br />
Breakdown<br />
£<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
Amount £<br />
including<br />
contingency<br />
Improving lake habitat 18,000.00<br />
islands 11,000.00<br />
planting 8,000.00<br />
Improving fishing in lake 20,000.00<br />
platforms 10,000.00<br />
jetty 10,000.00<br />
Boathouse 126,000.00<br />
feasibility study 2,000.00<br />
construction estimate 124,000.00<br />
Woodland management plan for <strong>Crookes</strong><br />
<strong>Valley</strong> Pk and <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
1,000.00<br />
Tree removal 10,000.00<br />
Herb Garden includes paving, 6 seats and a bin,<br />
plus planting and fence<br />
25,000.00<br />
Signage and interpretation 20,000.00<br />
entrance signs 4no@2k 9,000.00<br />
finger posts 3no. @2k 7,000.00<br />
history interpretation 2no Lecturn signs @1k 2,000.00<br />
8no bollards @£200 2,000.00<br />
Toilets no cost to<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s<br />
Play 33,000.00<br />
<strong>Park</strong> entrances 135,000.00<br />
new railing to crookes <strong>Valley</strong> Road<br />
250lm@£300/m<br />
75,000.00<br />
main entrance 27,000.00<br />
2no. ped entrances 22,000.00<br />
new entrance (excluding stepped ramp) 11,000.00<br />
Highway Ped priority to <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
no cost to<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
cont.<br />
45<br />
Resurface paths and reconstruct steps , 111,000.00<br />
resurface terraces @ £10/m2 33,000.00<br />
access road to Dam house 550m2@£20 12,000.00<br />
steps to terraces 44,000.00<br />
other steps 22,000.00<br />
Replace seats 20no@ £450 9,000.00<br />
Retaining walls 200lm@ £75/lm 17,000.00<br />
Planting 30,000.00<br />
Harcourt Rd entrance 5,000.00<br />
slope below Dam House 15,000.00<br />
adjacent new path 7,000.00<br />
n-w bank and other trees 3,000.00<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing at main entrance 26,000.00<br />
tarmac 5K 6,000.00<br />
retention and fence 17,000.00<br />
line marking 3,000.00<br />
New paths 59,000.00<br />
new path from main entrance 70lm @ K200/lm 16,000.00<br />
woodland path 150lm @ £100/lm includes some<br />
cut and fill<br />
17,000.00<br />
new path from Harcourt Road 22,000.00<br />
levels survey 4,000.00<br />
Increasing use of lake water garden 17,000.00<br />
Sunday market venue 20,000.00<br />
improved turning head 3,000.00<br />
retaining structure 17,000.00<br />
Lower terrace 372,000.00<br />
Crimea war memorial 350,000.00<br />
sculpture 22,000.00<br />
Alternative proposal for lower terrace 88,000.00<br />
sundial 66,000.00<br />
sculpture 22,000.00<br />
CCTV 17,000.00<br />
Enclosure for maintenance area 22,000.00<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
46<br />
Bowling Greens 12,000.00<br />
drainage 5,000.00<br />
irrigation 7,000.00<br />
Maintenance north west bank and knotweed no capital<br />
cost<br />
TOTAL 1,209,000.00<br />
Qualifications:<br />
• Costs are based on 2010 rates<br />
• Costs are based on traditional competitive tendering to main<br />
contractors<br />
• Contingencies of 10% are included in the breakdown<br />
Exclusions:<br />
• vat<br />
• Professional fees<br />
• Building regulations and planning fees<br />
• Inflation<br />
Environmental Planning Team
Grass<br />
Car park<br />
16<br />
Woodland and trees<br />
Proposed new trees<br />
Herb garden<br />
Proposed ornamental planting<br />
Existing paths<br />
New paths<br />
Stepped route<br />
Main entrance with boundary<br />
Minor entrance with boundary<br />
Boat house<br />
3<br />
Dam House<br />
Existing vehicular and pedestrian entrance<br />
Existing pedestrian entrance<br />
6<br />
New pedestrian entrance<br />
HARCOURT ROAD<br />
21<br />
8<br />
New ramped entrance<br />
13<br />
1<br />
15<br />
15<br />
Turning head<br />
Sculpture<br />
Water garden<br />
Jetty<br />
2<br />
12<br />
22<br />
10<br />
20<br />
Lake<br />
Island<br />
1<br />
17<br />
18<br />
9<br />
5<br />
5<br />
12<br />
7<br />
12<br />
Play area<br />
Bowling green<br />
Fishing platforms<br />
2<br />
12<br />
10<br />
14<br />
13<br />
CROOKES VALLEY ROAD<br />
Sundial/ Crimea War<br />
Memorial<br />
5<br />
17<br />
4<br />
12<br />
Bowling green<br />
14<br />
19<br />
20<br />
23<br />
Bowling hut<br />
12<br />
7<br />
MUSHROOM LANE<br />
16<br />
12<br />
17<br />
N<br />
1 Improve the lake habitat<br />
2 Improve fishing in the lake<br />
3 Upgrade the boathouse<br />
4 Woodland management<br />
5 Open up views with tree removal<br />
6 Herb garden<br />
7 New signage and interpretation<br />
8 Reopen toilets<br />
9 Improve play<br />
10 Improve entrances and boundaries<br />
11 Pedestrian priority to <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
12 Resurface paths and reconstruct steps<br />
13 Replace seats<br />
14 Repair retaining walls<br />
15 New planting<br />
16 Improve parking for disabled and bowlers<br />
17 New paths to make the park more accessible<br />
18 More interaction with the lake<br />
19 Sunday Market venue<br />
20 New features on the lower terrace<br />
21 Install CCTV<br />
22 Enclosure for the maintenance area<br />
23 Improve main bowling green and consider the<br />
future of second green<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Masterplan<br />
7<br />
10<br />
11
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.0 <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
6.1 Potential<br />
47<br />
The main potential is the great amount of available<br />
space to develop additional facilities and for more<br />
events.<br />
The open grass area at the bottom of the park has<br />
been used as an event space in recent years and<br />
there are plans to develop this.<br />
There are spectacular views across the lower end of<br />
the park which could be enhanced.<br />
Some good pedestrian routes through the park which<br />
could be improved and linked.<br />
Good facilities including the 5-aside goals, the<br />
toddler play facilities, the zip line and the climbing<br />
boulder.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
48<br />
The historic character at the top of the park could be<br />
enhanced.<br />
-Stone gate posts below the woodland<br />
-Steps up the wooded slope with interesting stone<br />
retaining wall<br />
The dramatic character of the top of the park, with its<br />
woodland slopes and terraced paths could be<br />
enhanced and improved<br />
-Stepped ramp up to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road<br />
Potentially great views into the park from <strong>Crookes</strong><br />
<strong>Valley</strong> Road and Mushroom Lane<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
49<br />
The woodland slopes are good for wildlife but as<br />
pointed out in the ecology report, this habitat could<br />
be improved.<br />
As with <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, the Friends are very<br />
involved and active.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.2 Problems<br />
50<br />
The bottom of the park in particular, lacks a<br />
clear identity with featureless boundaries and<br />
entrances. It feels more like a characterless<br />
open space than a park.<br />
The bottom of the park lacks an adequate<br />
vehicular entrance.<br />
Views from <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road and<br />
Mushroom lane are totally blocked by dense<br />
woodland and the entrances feel overgrown<br />
and dark with poor sight lines. This leads to a<br />
perceived lack of safety in this area.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
51<br />
Paths and Access:<br />
There isn’t a circular route around the park,<br />
without using the surrounding roads.<br />
Desire lines through the grass indicate the need<br />
for additional paths. Visible here at the bottom of<br />
the ‘Hundred Steps’<br />
There is a lack of clarity of circulation, with path<br />
widths and surfacing bearing no relation to the<br />
importance of the routes. Some tarmac paths are<br />
in poor repair and some are un-surfaced. The<br />
photos opposite show one of the paths at the<br />
bottom of the park and the onebetween the<br />
football pitch and the woodland.<br />
Some paths are not wide enough and others have<br />
sudden changes in width due to historic road<br />
widths.<br />
Whilst indicating a certain historic interest, this is<br />
outweighed by the uneasy and unfinished<br />
character it imposes at the bottom of the park.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
52<br />
The straight path which runs up the park below<br />
the tower blocks narrows abruptly from 5m at<br />
the bottom to less than 2m further up. There<br />
are additional areas of tarmac off this path with<br />
no apparent purpose which are also remnants<br />
of the old road system, and the uncomfortable<br />
feel is compounded with one side of the path<br />
being edged with road kerbs and the other side<br />
having a flush edging.<br />
The two main paths crossing the park, which<br />
were once sections of roads, (Fawcett Street<br />
and Hammond Street) are approximately 5m<br />
wide and so out of scale with the adjacent<br />
paths.<br />
Both of these paths flood in heavy rain at their<br />
lowest points.<br />
There is poor accessibility to the top of the park<br />
with steep gradients and many flights of steps<br />
with no handrails<br />
The football pitch is currently unusable due to<br />
poor drainage and inadequate construction.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
53<br />
There is a lack of signage relating to facilities<br />
within the park as well as to and from the park.<br />
Seating and bins: some seats are in poor repair<br />
and generally there are not enough of either.<br />
The buttresses at the base of the tower blocks<br />
are unsightly.<br />
There is little management of the woodland<br />
which has a dense understorey.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.3 Design Principles for the <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
The key principles underlining the strategy were to:<br />
54<br />
• Encourage more people to use the park in more diverse ways<br />
• Develop existing facilities and introduce new ones with an emphasis on<br />
physical activity and events.<br />
• Upgrade the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> from an open space to a destination park by<br />
developing and enhancing its character and strengths so that it is no<br />
longer considered the poor relation of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston<br />
<strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• Unify the park and develop a ‘sense of place’.<br />
• Improve circulation and accessibility<br />
• Encourage links with <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Enhance the historic nature of the park.<br />
• Develop its character, much less formal than both Weston <strong>Park</strong> and<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• Improve legibility and encourage links to the adjacent parks<br />
• Improve habitats<br />
• Involve Community Groups and local schools in the regeneration<br />
works.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.4 Early actions prior to further design work:<br />
55<br />
• Feasibility of a pedestrian crossing over <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road to the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> to be discussed with Highways.<br />
• Discussion and agreement with Neighbourhoods regarding entrances<br />
to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> between the tower blocks (see also map showing<br />
land ownership in Appendix 1).<br />
6.5 Masterplan Proposals:<br />
All proposals are made in the light of information available at the time of<br />
writing and are not set in stone. They represent a balanced overview of the<br />
future direction of the <strong>Park</strong> taking account of all the constraints and<br />
opportunities described.<br />
Please note that although an attempt has been made to list the proposals in<br />
order of priority, this is likely to change as the availability of funding changes<br />
over time.<br />
Planning permission may be required for some of these proposals and this<br />
should be taken into account as and when proceeding with further design<br />
work.<br />
1) Circular walk<br />
Creating a circular walk round the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> see map following would go a<br />
long way towards developing a sense that it is a park, rather than a space<br />
which is crossed on the way to somewhere else.<br />
See below: Trails, routes, signage and way-marking for fitness and other<br />
circuits which could utilise the new route.<br />
The whole circuit should be paved in tarmac with a minimum width of 3m. As<br />
many of the paths in the park are not accessible due to steep gradients<br />
incorporating steps, this route should be designed to be as accessible as<br />
possible<br />
The new paths required to complete the circular route would be most<br />
straightforward at the lower end of the park where gradients are relatively<br />
gentle.<br />
The existing loose surfaced section of path below the woodland should be<br />
upgraded and reconstructed to tarmac. (see also Wetland habitat).<br />
The section from Oxford Street downhill is much steeper but a relatively<br />
accessible gradient of 1:10 is achievable from Oxford Street below the first<br />
tower block by curving the path across the slope. Below this, where the<br />
gradient steepens further the circular route would incorporate steps and an<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
alternative non-stepped route, would zigzag down the slope by incorporating<br />
firstly the route of the existing desire line, which runs from the corner of Martin<br />
Street and Albion Street to the bottom of the ‘hundred steps’, and then turning<br />
to incorporate an improved section of path back towards the bottom of the<br />
new steps. This would also provide a vehicular route for maintenance and<br />
possible event use with a relatively gentle gradient, although at approximately<br />
1:10 it would not be fully accessible.<br />
From the bottom of the hundred steps, the circular route extends eastwards to<br />
the path from the Fawcett Street entrance. By allowing vehicular access on<br />
this section also, an alternative occasional cross-park route would be possible<br />
for events.<br />
To complete the circuit, there is a proposed new section between Fawcett<br />
Street and Hammond Street joining up with the path around the events space.<br />
The sections of path on steeper slopes will of course require cutting into the<br />
slopes. The surplus fill created by this, if of adequate quality, could be used in<br />
building up the upgraded path under the woodland. (see also Wetland<br />
habitat).<br />
Cost estimate: £295,000<br />
2) Woodland management<br />
The consultation indicated interest in improved habitats in the park and the<br />
ecological report suggests the following to improve the habitat value of the<br />
woodland area:<br />
o Producing and implementing a combined management plan for the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Cost estimate: £1,000 (included in the <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> estimate)<br />
o Selective tree removal and pruning to open up the views into the top of<br />
the park mainly to either side of the entrances but also opening up additional<br />
views in. This should encourage greater use and make the entrances feel<br />
more secure and open. The creation of a woodland ‘ride’ along the top path<br />
below <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road. Through cutting back overhanging trees to allow<br />
more light in, and the area currently dominated by docks, planted or seeded<br />
with woodland edge species. Tree works could include rotational coppicing<br />
that would vary the structure of the woodland, crown lifting to further open up<br />
views, and improve the ground flora by thinning the woodland to create small<br />
glades.<br />
Cost estimate: £15,000<br />
56<br />
o Create habitat piles in the woodland, away from the entrances<br />
o Replacement of bird boxes and introduction of bat boxes.<br />
This work could be carried out by volunteers.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
3) Boundaries and entrances<br />
By redesigning the entrances to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> to include new entrance<br />
features and by enclosing the open boundaries, mainly in the lower park, the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> will be transformed, making it feel like a welcoming park rather<br />
than just an open space. To ensure that views into and across the park are<br />
still retained, the boundary treatment should be quite low.<br />
The boundary along Mushroom Lane similarly, though as a lower priority,<br />
would benefit from the same boundary treatment, removing the need for<br />
boulders to stop unauthorised parking. It would also provide a visual link with<br />
the boundary in the lower area and tie in with the entrance on <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
Road.<br />
Both the boundary treatment and all the entrances should be designed<br />
together as a family despite the very different characters at the top and<br />
bottom of the park. It would be beneficial to include an Artist (perhaps an<br />
Artist/Blacksmith) in the design process to work with the community and<br />
designers, to ensure a unique and exciting design which should be relevant to<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>s Character.<br />
The design of the entrances and boundary treatment should take into account<br />
the requirement for low maintenance and repairs. If the chosen design does<br />
require maintenance, a budget for this would need to be built in. See Design<br />
Palette for suggested materials.<br />
o <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road entrances<br />
The most important entrance at the top of the park is the one, opposite the<br />
entrances to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong> and the other entrance<br />
further up is also very well used.<br />
The design should reflect the importance of these two entrances and selective<br />
tree removal and pruning on the wooded slopes below are crucial in opening<br />
up the views into the park and making it more welcoming and feel safer.<br />
The main entrance should include removal of the old railings, totem poles and<br />
paving, the opening up of views in and upgrading with new features.<br />
Colourful herbaceous and shrub planting would signal its importance and<br />
create a link with <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong>, as mentioned in<br />
relation to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, the possibility of a pedestrian crossing is<br />
being investigated, which would make an easier link to the other two parks.<br />
<strong>Park</strong> signage is also required at this entrance<br />
o Entrance at the corner of St Phillips Road and Upperthorpe Road<br />
This is the major entrance at the lower end of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and the new<br />
design should reflect this. Colourful herbaceous and shrub planting would<br />
enhance this and the other main entrances.<br />
57<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
o Upperthorpe Road Entrance<br />
This is an important entrance at the end of the long straight promenade, in the<br />
lower area. The view up this path should remain uncluttered in the new<br />
design. A new vehicular access should also be included here, it should<br />
appear secondary to the pedestrian entrance, whilst allowing access to the<br />
events space and access to the bottom of the park for emergency vehicles.<br />
o Oxford Street Entrance<br />
Another major entrance, which, if upgraded would improve accessibility to the<br />
park. Delineation of disabled parking bays on Oxford Street adjacent to the<br />
entrance, and pedestrian drop crossings combined with the proposed circular<br />
walk would make much of the park accessible. This entrance should include<br />
access for emergency and maintenance vehicles and, as with the<br />
Upperthorpe entrance, the vehicular gate should be designed in with the<br />
pedestrian entrance and appear secondary to it.<br />
The existing grass parking bays in the park should be removed.<br />
o Minor entrances<br />
There are approximately 12 further minor entrances to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>,<br />
including those between the tower blocks. It is important to continue the<br />
theme of the major entrances though in a simpler and reduced way, in order<br />
to reinforce the idea of the park, not just an open space. This will require<br />
consultation with Neighbourhoods, for the entrances between the tower<br />
blocks, if work is to be carried out on their land<br />
Cost estimate: £661,000<br />
4) Trails, routes, signage and way-marking<br />
The routes around the park as well as to the adjacent parks and open spaces<br />
should be clearly way-marked.<br />
o Finger posts should be used to direct people to facilities within the park<br />
and to the other parks, whilst way marking posts should be used for the trails<br />
and routes around the park.<br />
o The possibility of activity trails around the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> was raised in the<br />
Consultation document. These routes would provide a new dimension to the<br />
park. All-age fitness equipment located around the circular route combined<br />
with marking out distances on the routes would encourage more active use of<br />
the park. ZEST running club and others have said that they would find this<br />
useful. (see ‘Improved play provision and outdoor gym equipment’ for the cost<br />
of equipment).<br />
The consultation indicated that a high percentage of people use this park for<br />
both dog walking and exercise supporting this proposal.<br />
o Nature and history trails with interpretation would add another layer of<br />
interest and could be linked with interpretation to the trails in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong>.<br />
58<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
o Cycling routes through the park can be encouraged without formalising<br />
routes (see masterplan). One route crossing the park from Oxford Street to<br />
Fawcett Street along the circular route. A second route down much of the<br />
length of the park would again start at Oxford Street and run to the bottom of<br />
the 100 steps then it would follow the vehicular route to the long straight path<br />
below the tower blocks.<br />
Cost estimate: £17,000<br />
5) Football pitches<br />
The consultation process evidenced interest from a wide range of<br />
stakeholders, including ZEST, to improve the sports facilities on the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>.<br />
The football pitch should be reconstructed incorporating drainage to make it<br />
more useable this should include improving the run down informal terraces in<br />
the western corner. (See also Wetland habitat below)<br />
This area could also be used for American Football as there is a lot of interest<br />
locally.<br />
A detailed specification was drawn up and costed in 2007 for the football pitch<br />
improvements, but was never implemented. (See Appendix 2)<br />
Consultation also raised interest in locating a multi-games pitch in this area as<br />
well as keeping the football pitch. The area available is not big enough for<br />
both. There is, however, the possibility of expanding the 5-aside pitch further<br />
down the slope, to provide a 45m x 27m mini soccer pitch. Interest in this was<br />
raised by youngsters using the area recently and also ZEST who run a<br />
number of sports events and activities in the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>. This work could be<br />
carried out when the existing surface is ready for renewal. As this area<br />
slopes, regrading would be necessary to provide a playable gradient and a<br />
40lm length of retaining wall approximately 1m high would be necessary on<br />
the upper side. This pitch would also need drainage and the water from this<br />
should be disposed of on site. As the site would be below the proposed<br />
wetland (see below), a separate swale or other sustainable drainage scheme<br />
should be designed in.<br />
Cost estimate: £115,000<br />
6) Wetland habitat<br />
The original stream running through the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>, is now fed into a<br />
combined sewer which runs under the park and eventually discharges in to<br />
the River Don. This makes unfeasible the earlier idea of opening this up the<br />
stream at the surface. This was based on initial investigation which indicated<br />
that the culvert contained the just the stream.<br />
The provision of a wetland area, however, would be both possible and<br />
sustainable. The unpaved path between the football pitch and the woodland is<br />
regularly wet and eroded by run off water flowing down hill. When this path is<br />
paved as part of the circular route, the level on the path should be raised to<br />
allow the construction of a swale to one side to pick up the run off. Ground<br />
water from the football pitch drainage system should also be fed to this area,<br />
59<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
which could be designed to act as a sustainable urban drainage system,<br />
ending with a wetland area near the bottom of the ‘hundred steps’ which<br />
would be wet or dry depending on the weather and season. This would not<br />
only prevent the path from being eroded by the run off and provide a<br />
destination for water collected land drainage proposed for the football pitch. It<br />
would also have the added benefit of providing a different habitat area.<br />
Cost estimate: £11,000<br />
7) Improved play provision and outdoor gym equipment<br />
The need for better play provision was raised in the consultation document.<br />
The lower play area would be much improved with an additional large piece of<br />
play equipment. Similarly in the play area for older children, a single big and<br />
challenging piece of equipment would be a great draw.<br />
Good signage would also help to link them (see ‘Trails, routes, signage and<br />
way-marking’).<br />
Cost estimate: £71,000<br />
Outdoor gym equipment around the circular route as mentioned under ‘Trails,<br />
routes, signage and way-marking’.<br />
Cost estimate: £20,000<br />
8) Upgrading other paths and steps to improve accessibility and<br />
develop a hierarchy of paths<br />
Consultation highlighted demand for the upgrading of the following paths and<br />
steps:<br />
60<br />
o The 100 steps would be improved with a more robust construction.<br />
This issue was raised in the consultation document.<br />
o The various flights of steps at the top of the park that are in poor repair.<br />
Accessibility would be improved by reconstruction and incorporation of<br />
handrails, whilst retaining their distinctive historic feel and the unusual<br />
stone walling to the sides.<br />
o The worn out tarmac paths at the top of the park would benefit from<br />
resurfacing.<br />
Developing a hierarchy of paths would make the park more ‘legible’. It should<br />
be clear to the visitor whether a path is a main route, or a minor one. This<br />
should be indicated by both the surfacing and the width of the paths. Ideally<br />
the most important routes should be between 3m and 4m wide, less important<br />
but still busy paths should be between 2.5 and 3m wide and occasional and<br />
informal paths 1.8-2m wide. All except the more informal paths through<br />
woodland should be surfaced with tarmac. This would improve accessibility<br />
as well as having the added benefit of reducing maintenance.<br />
Consequently, as part of the circular walk, the narrow section of the straight<br />
path which runs up the park below the tower blocks should be widened with a<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
better designed transition with the wider section and the odd remnants of<br />
paths removed. Similarly, the loose surfaced paths at the bottom of the park<br />
should be constructed in tarmac and their alignment adjusted to fit more<br />
comfortably in the landscape.<br />
Some paths could be narrowed down where they are much wider than<br />
warranted, the two main paths crossing the park, which were once sections of<br />
roads, (Fawcett Street and Hammond Street) could be narrowed from the<br />
current 5m down to half of that. This is however seen as a lower priority. If<br />
carried out the design should ensure that vehicular access is maintained for<br />
events.<br />
An added benefit of this would be that the opportunity could be taken to<br />
remove the road kerbs and replace them with flush edgings and drain the<br />
paths to the lower side with a linear soak-away area adjacent to the paths or<br />
the proposed wetland. This would be a more sustainable approach to<br />
draining the paths, and with a much smaller surface area there would be less<br />
water to drain away. In the short term, regular unblocking and/ or repairing<br />
the road gulleys would solve the problem.<br />
Full accessibility throughout the park is not feasible due to the steep gradients<br />
at the top of the park. Some accessible routes though, are possible and these<br />
should be signed.<br />
Cost estimate: £83,000<br />
9) Planting and maintenance<br />
Planting:<br />
The main entrances would be enhanced with colourful planting, possibly<br />
including herbaceous and low shrub planting.<br />
Planting at the bases of the buttresses of the tower blocks with self clinging<br />
climbing plants would soften these structures and integrate the tower blocks<br />
more successfully into the park. The soil in these areas should be improved<br />
as previous planting schemes here have had limited success and this is<br />
probably due in part to poor quality ground with building rubble near the<br />
surface.<br />
Trees<br />
The lower end of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> would benefit from additional tree planting<br />
(as indicated on the following masterplan). These would enhance the sense<br />
of enclosure and frame the events space, but trees should be grouped<br />
carefully to avoid blocking views across the park.<br />
Groups of trees adjacent to the proposed new path below Oxford Street would<br />
assist in integrating the path and a further group to the side of the play area<br />
would help to integrate it into the landscape whilst maintaining clear views in<br />
and out.<br />
The double row of trees to the lower side the path crossing the park from the<br />
Fawcett Street entrance could be mirrored on the other side of the path with a<br />
61<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
single row to create an avenue whilst avoiding disturbance of the 5 aside<br />
pitch. Similarly the path from the Hammond Street entrance, where there is<br />
an avenue, but which stops short of the entrance, would look more complete if<br />
the trees went right up to the entrance.<br />
New trees should be extra heavy standards to be more resilient to vandalism.<br />
Maintenance:<br />
Removal/ treatment of Japanese knotweed should be carried out to prevent<br />
the problem spreading.<br />
Wild flowers have been planted in the long grass around the football pitch.<br />
This area receives an annual cut to ensure that they survive and thrive. This<br />
should be continued.<br />
The orchard area would be much improved with better management and<br />
maintenance. A local group, possibly linked to the Community Forestry<br />
programme could take on this area.<br />
Cost estimate (planting only): £13,000<br />
10) Events Space<br />
The bottom of the park is becoming popular as an events venue and is home<br />
to the annual Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> Festival and was the site of the recent Film<br />
Festival. If the park continues to grow in popularity as an event space it would<br />
be pertinent to consider implementing the following:<br />
o Levelling the grass areas which have sunk due to the presence of<br />
cellars bellow, and draining the area (this will also maximise recreational and<br />
sports use of the flat grass area).<br />
o Improving the vehicular access with a one way vehicular route which<br />
would enter from the Hammond Street entrance, across the park and turning<br />
right on to the main straight path to exit on Upperthorpe Road. This route<br />
would require path widening to allow large vehicles to turn adjacent to the<br />
playground, and the realignment of the playground fence to facilitate this.<br />
(See also vehicular route as part of the circular route re vehicular access to<br />
the top of the park).<br />
o A major improvement for events would be providing utilities for use<br />
during events, particularly a sewage connection, possibly into the existing<br />
combined sewer. Water and telephone connections would also be helpful and<br />
the provision of power points could also be considered. (The suggested<br />
locations for these are indicated on the masterplan).<br />
o The proposed boundary treatment, improved paths around the space<br />
and careful tree planting (see above) would give this space a much needed<br />
face face-lift (not included in this cost).<br />
62<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
See also Appendix 5 (Minutes of the meeting regarding improvements for<br />
events)<br />
Cost estimate: £126,000<br />
11) Seats and bins<br />
The need for additional seats was raised in the consultation document. New<br />
seats and bins as well as replacing the old ones would encourage more<br />
people to stay longer and be less likely to just use the park as a short cut.<br />
The seats should be located generally in sunny spots, and should be<br />
positioned mainly around the circular walk, to provide resting places.<br />
A couple of meeting places could be created by grouping some of the seats<br />
close together just off the paths either at path junctions or adjacent to features<br />
such as the play areas.<br />
Careful choice of the style of both would help to give the park a facelift and<br />
also, by using a single design, help to unify the park. See the design palette.<br />
Cost estimate: £31,000<br />
12) Enhancing the Historic Character<br />
Repairing the stone gateway and locating the historical interpretation in this<br />
vicinity, as it is also close to the site of one of the reservoirs, would add<br />
interest.<br />
Cost estimate: £5,000<br />
63<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.6 Design Palette<br />
As the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> is less formal in appearance than <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and<br />
should be contemporary in character. This should be reflected in the design,<br />
the choice of seats and bins as with the design of the entrances and<br />
boundaries. The elements should also be very robust to withstand heavy<br />
wear. The street furniture should be linked to the design of the entrances and<br />
boundaries with the choice of colour and / or finish. No more than 2 colours<br />
should be used.<br />
• Entrances and boundaries<br />
The design, materials and finish will be determined as the design is<br />
developed, however the materials should be robust and with a low<br />
maintenance requirement. Galvanised mild steel with a tee-wash finish would<br />
be one alternative, as it is maintenance free and would be in keeping with the<br />
contemporary feel.<br />
64<br />
13)<br />
14)<br />
15)<br />
16)<br />
17)<br />
18)<br />
19)<br />
20)<br />
Galvanised and tee-washed<br />
finish to entrances at Mount<br />
Pleasant <strong>Park</strong> Sheffield<br />
made by Chris Brammall<br />
Boundary rails made by Chris<br />
Campbell TDE Design Ltd.<br />
The images indicate styles which would be appropriate for the new entrances<br />
and boundaries at <strong>Ponderosa</strong>.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
• Seats<br />
The choice of seats should allow for some variety of detail whilst being in the<br />
same family of designs.<br />
For robustness, metal has been chosen<br />
Seats with arm rests would be best located in the lower areas of the park, with<br />
benches along the main paths in the upper areas. Along informal paths in the<br />
woodland, robust rustic timber benches would be more appropriate.<br />
65<br />
Broxap Weyburn Seat with arm rests and<br />
bench<br />
Green oak bench from Caledonia Play<br />
suitable for informal paths in woodland<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
• Bins<br />
Bins should complement the design of the benches, be simple in design and<br />
robust in construction.<br />
66<br />
Broxap bin<br />
• Signage interpretation boards and way-marking<br />
As referred to in the section about <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, a family of signage<br />
should follow through all three parks. Any metalwork elements should be<br />
painted black for continuity<br />
Fitzpatrick Woolmer lectern style display<br />
board which would be suitable for the<br />
historical information board<br />
An example of graphics style which<br />
suitable for information boards<br />
‘Stylos’ finger post by William Smith<br />
appropriate for both signing directions<br />
within and between the parks.<br />
The posts should be painted black with<br />
white lettering<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
67<br />
Timber posts appropriate for waymarking<br />
the trails<br />
• Paving<br />
Paving should generally be tarmac with simple concrete edgings except for at<br />
the entrances where locally, alternative paving such as high quality concrete<br />
paving units could be combined with the tarmac, such as Marshalls<br />
Conservation setts and kerbs.<br />
The path through the woodland should be crushed bark.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.7 Quick wins<br />
Commission and implement the woodland management plan and open up<br />
some of the views<br />
Signage to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
Some new seats and bins<br />
Treatment of Japanese knotweed<br />
Resurfacing some paths.<br />
Open up some of the views from <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road<br />
Signage to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and Weston <strong>Park</strong>, and within the <strong>Park</strong><br />
68<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
6.8 <strong>Ponderosa</strong> budget estimates<br />
See notes below re. qualifications and exclusions<br />
Cont.<br />
69<br />
Description<br />
Breakdown<br />
£<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
Amount £<br />
including<br />
contingency<br />
Circular route 295,000.00<br />
approx 555lm new path 3m wide level ground @<br />
£200/lm 122000<br />
approx 555lm new path across steep gradient @<br />
£250/lm 153000<br />
upgraded section of path 85lm @£80/lm 10000<br />
additional for steps and handrails 10000<br />
Woodland management plan included in<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> VP<br />
Tree removal 15,000.00<br />
Boundaries and entrances 578,000.00<br />
boundary trt 650lm@ £300/lm 215000<br />
combined ped. and vehicular entrances 4no<br />
@35k 154000<br />
main ped. entrances 8no@ 20k 176000<br />
minor ped. entrances 6no @ 5k 33000<br />
Trails routes signs and way marking 5no<br />
finger posts @2k 20no bollard posts@ £200 2<br />
no lecterns @ £500 includes historic character 17,000.00<br />
5no finger posts @2k 11000<br />
20no bollard posts @£200 5000<br />
2no lecterns @ £500 1000<br />
Football pitches 115,000.00<br />
main pitch 55000<br />
mini soccer including regrading, drainage and<br />
retention 60000<br />
Wetland habitat 11,000.00<br />
Play provision and outdoor gym equipment 91,000.00<br />
play equipment 71000<br />
fitness equipment 8no @ £10k 20000
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
70<br />
Upgrading other paths and steps 83,000.00<br />
the 100 steps 22000<br />
other steps 28000<br />
paths at top of park 33000<br />
Planting 13,000.00<br />
mixed planting 7000<br />
trees 6000<br />
Events space 126,000.00<br />
regrading, compacting, drainage and reseeding 67000<br />
work to vehicular route 15000<br />
electrical points 25000<br />
sewage connection 6000<br />
water and telecom 13000<br />
Seats and Bins includes 18no seats, 6no bins<br />
bit of paving 31,000.00<br />
Historic character 5,000.00<br />
TOTAL 1,380,000.00<br />
Qualifications:<br />
• Costs are based on 2010 rates<br />
• Costs are based on traditional competitive tendering to main<br />
contractors<br />
• Contingencies of 10% are included in the breakdown<br />
Exclusions:<br />
• vat<br />
• Professional fees<br />
• Building regulations and planning fees<br />
• Inflation<br />
Environmental Planning Team
Short grass<br />
Wild flowers in long grass<br />
Woodland and trees<br />
Proposed new trees<br />
Existing paths<br />
New paths<br />
Circular walk<br />
Upgraded path<br />
Stepped route<br />
Main entrance with boundary<br />
Minor entrance with boundary<br />
Existing vehicular and pedestrian entrance<br />
Existing pedestrian entrance<br />
New pedestrian entrance<br />
New outdoor gym equipment<br />
Meeting place<br />
Cycle route<br />
N<br />
3<br />
OXFORD STREET<br />
9<br />
3<br />
CROOKES VALLEY ROAD<br />
3<br />
12<br />
9<br />
12<br />
8<br />
5<br />
Play area<br />
Terraces<br />
3<br />
1<br />
Football pitch<br />
6<br />
2<br />
9<br />
Gate posts<br />
13<br />
10<br />
7<br />
3<br />
7<br />
MUSHROOM LANE<br />
12<br />
Mini soccer pitch<br />
6<br />
Wetland<br />
Hundred steps<br />
9<br />
5<br />
12<br />
MARTIN STREET<br />
Play area<br />
8<br />
UPPERTHORPE ROAD<br />
1<br />
FAWCETT STREET<br />
Events area<br />
11<br />
9<br />
HAMMOND STREET<br />
ST PHILIPS ROAD<br />
1 Circular walk<br />
2 Woodland management<br />
3 Open up views in<br />
4 Improve boundaries and entrances<br />
5 New trails routes, signage and way-marking<br />
6 Improve the football pitches<br />
7 Introduce wetland habitat<br />
8 Improve play<br />
9 Upgrade and develop a hierarchy of paths<br />
10 New planting<br />
11 Improve the events space<br />
12 Seats and meeting places<br />
13 Enhance the historic character<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> Masterplan<br />
12<br />
10
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
_____________________________________________<br />
7.0 <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
7.1 Potential<br />
71<br />
This park has a lovely woodland character, with<br />
masses of potential to improve the habitat value.<br />
There are some good pedestrian routes and<br />
potential to introduce additional routes to link these<br />
up.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
72<br />
There are great views over <strong>Park</strong>wood Springs<br />
There are some good facilities which could be<br />
improved and added to.<br />
- embankment slide<br />
- basketball court<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.2 Problems<br />
73<br />
The park lacks a sense of place. The entrances and<br />
the boundaries are bland and featureless with no<br />
clear identity.<br />
The entrances are not very welcoming, most being<br />
dominated with barriers. In some areas there isn’t<br />
an entrance where one would be useful<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
74<br />
Many of the routes are unclear with overgrown<br />
vegetation and poor sightlines.<br />
This makes the park feel unsafe and discourages<br />
use.<br />
There is a general feel of unkemptness and litter is<br />
often a problem.<br />
Scrubby growth has taken over in some areas which<br />
increases the run down appearance. Not only does<br />
this sort of vegetation look unsightly, but also it has<br />
limited wildlife value, as has been raised in the<br />
ecological report<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
75<br />
The steep slopes limit potential to create new<br />
facilities<br />
‘Desire lines’ indicate where paths are needed.<br />
These are mainly on the steep slopes.<br />
The play area is unappealing and shabby and is<br />
dominated by the metal fence.<br />
It lacks exciting and challenging equipment and has<br />
little character.<br />
The dead tree here adds to the run down feel.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
76<br />
Many of the facilities are run down and poorly<br />
located.<br />
The sculptural ‘sofa’ is located in a grass area with<br />
no path for access and it gets lost in the long grass.<br />
The youth shelter is poorly located at the top of the<br />
embankment slide, which is an unappealing place for<br />
young people to meet and is rarely used.<br />
The skate facilities are un-used. Furthermore, the<br />
rim of the skate bowl is not set correctly for skaters.<br />
It is poorly located in the woodland as leaves are a<br />
persistent problem.<br />
The current surface to the multigames area is prone<br />
to vandalism.<br />
The combination of poor visibility through the park, a<br />
poor network of paths and the steep wooded slopes<br />
combine with the lack of signage and lead to a lack<br />
of legibility.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.3 Design Principles<br />
The key principles underlining the strategy were to:<br />
77<br />
• Encourage more people to use the park in more diverse ways<br />
• Develop existing facilities and introduce new ones with an emphasis on<br />
natural play and physical activity<br />
• Develop more of a ‘sense of place’.<br />
• Improve circulation and accessibility<br />
• Encourage links with the Ruskin <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
• Develop more fully the woodland character.<br />
• Improve habitats<br />
• Involve Community Groups and local schools in the regeneration<br />
works.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.4 Masterplan Proposals:<br />
All proposals are made in the light of information available at the time of<br />
writing and are not set in stone. They represent a balanced overview of the<br />
future direction of the <strong>Park</strong> taking account of all the constraints and<br />
opportunities described.<br />
Please note that although an attempt has been made to list the proposals in<br />
order of priority, this is likely to change as the availability of funding changes<br />
over time.<br />
Planning permission may be required for some of these proposals and this<br />
should be investigated and taken into account as and when proceeding with<br />
future design work.<br />
1) Habitat improvements and management<br />
The consultation indicated interest in improving habitats in the park and the<br />
ecological report suggests the implementation of a habitat management plan<br />
to:<br />
78<br />
o Improve the woodland ground flora by thinning the woodland to create<br />
small glades and wildflower planting.<br />
o Install bird and bat boxes.<br />
o Keep open sight lines along paths by removing saplings growing along<br />
path edges and mowing the edges regularly to make the open space<br />
feel safer.<br />
o Open up views out of the site with selective pruning and tree removal.<br />
o Retain but control the nettle patches in the grassland so that they don’t<br />
spread any further.<br />
o Annual mowing of long grass areas and removal of arisings to improve<br />
grassland habitat.<br />
o Wild flower planting in the grassland areas<br />
o Scrub removal to prevent the whole area becoming woodland.<br />
More detailed information can be founding the ecological report which is<br />
available in <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside.<br />
Cost estimate: £1,000<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
2) Improved play provision<br />
This park is a perfect setting for natural play which would enhance the existing<br />
play ground. Natural play should be integrated into woodland and grass areas<br />
using natural materials where possible.<br />
The site of the existing youth shelter would provide an ideal spot for a play log<br />
set in bark surfacing. The existing play area would be improved with some<br />
additional play equipment such as a roundabout or a cone climber.<br />
As the skate bowl is not usable in its current condition, this site could be used<br />
for a nest swing.<br />
Some ideas for play improvements:<br />
79<br />
• Play log<br />
• Nest swing supplied by<br />
Sutcliffe Play<br />
• Cone climber supplied by<br />
Playdale<br />
• Art work by Coralie Turpin<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
The remaining skate facilities could be retained and enhanced with carefully<br />
located stone and granite ledges in this area.<br />
A play trail would encourage children to explore the whole park and try<br />
everything. A fitness challenge could be included to encourage children to<br />
run between the various locations with distances marked.<br />
Setting great equipment and features in the woodland would encourage more<br />
people to actively go into the heart of the space rather than passing through it<br />
or just using the play area.<br />
A few larger pieces could be complemented with smaller low key play<br />
elements.<br />
The level area freed up with a simplified entrance layout (see below:<br />
boundaries and entrances), would provide space for some more low key<br />
natural play, though here, siting should be considered in relation to the<br />
proximity of the adjacent houses.<br />
Cost estimate: £82,000<br />
3) Improved Sport Provision<br />
Whilst the fencing and goal posts in the basket ball court are in fairly good<br />
condition, the sports surfacing is in need of renewal or replacement with a<br />
more durable surface such as porous tarmac. This may already exist under<br />
the existing mats so this should be checked out and either the mats could be<br />
removed exposing the tarmac or a new porous tarmac surface applied.<br />
Basketball facilities are generally very popular, and the reason this one is not<br />
well used could be due to the overgrown nature of the site, which creates a<br />
feeling of enclosure and people not feeling completely safe, as does the<br />
single entry point. Consequently, improved management of the site is the<br />
highest priority here as is opening up an additional entrance to link in with the<br />
proposed new path.<br />
Cost estimate: £25,000<br />
4) Improved Circulation and Accessibility<br />
The footpath network would be greatly improved with some additional<br />
entrances and routes across the slopes. Most of the existing paths tend to<br />
follow the contours, which is good for accessibility but not so good for<br />
circulation. The new routes would follow the desire lines which indicate where<br />
people want to go and would make it possible to walk around the park rather<br />
than just cross it. As these routes are all on steep gradients they would<br />
consist mainly of flights of steps with handrails and adequate landings to<br />
make them as accessible as possible.<br />
The main path from <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens at the bottom of the slope and at<br />
the south eastern corner of the park would be linked with a series of paths<br />
and steps up to Daniel Hill via the entrances on Carnarvon Street and<br />
Yeomans Road.<br />
A second route starting further along the bottom path would provide an<br />
alternative access to the Basketball court and to the path above it.<br />
80<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
A new entrance and path from Fox Road down to the top of the embankment<br />
slide would create a useful new access into the park and by passing close to<br />
the concrete ‘sofa’ would provide a path to it.<br />
A further new entrance at the northern end of the park on Whitehouse Lane<br />
could join up with the main path.<br />
These new paths are all indicated in the Masterplan map following this<br />
section.<br />
The existing path from Fox Road to <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens and the one joining<br />
it from Portland Court, are the main routes through the park. They are both<br />
accessible and currently cycle friendly. The proposed entrances should retain<br />
this facility.<br />
Cost estimate: £107,000<br />
5) Boundaries and entrances<br />
Redesigning the entrances to <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens to include new entrance<br />
features and enclosing some of the open boundaries, this open space would<br />
give a distinct, attractive identity to the park and encourage people in. The<br />
design should be developed in consultation with the local community and<br />
possibly with an Artist/ Blacksmith or stone Artist.<br />
The entrances from Fox Road, and from <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens are the main<br />
entrances and this should be reinforced in the design.<br />
The current layout from <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens has three paths leading into the<br />
site at the main entrance. The boundary treatment will naturally channel<br />
movement to the entrance, which will allow the layout to be simplified, freeing<br />
up level space for seating and possibly more natural play.<br />
(See Design Palette for ideas for the boundary treatment.)<br />
Cost estimate: £187,000<br />
6) Trails, signage and way-marking<br />
The routes through the park should be clearly way-marked.<br />
A nature trail would be a great way to highlight interesting trees, plants and<br />
habitats. It could be signed with numbered bollards linking back to a centrally<br />
located map which also shows the play trail. (See also above: Improved play<br />
provision)<br />
A notice board for the park is planned and being designed. Its design and<br />
location should decided in keeping with the overall masterplan design palette.<br />
Signage to Ruskin <strong>Park</strong> could be located at the new entrance on Fox Street<br />
and to <strong>Ponderosa</strong> from the Daniel Hill Street entrance.<br />
Cost estimate: £11,000<br />
7) Seats and bins<br />
Introducing more seating would encourage people to stay longer and be less<br />
likely to just use the park as a short cut.<br />
81<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
A couple of meeting places could be created by grouping some of the seats<br />
close together just off the paths either at path junctions or adjacent to features<br />
such as the main play area. A circle of carved sitting blocks adjacent to the<br />
horse chestnut and around the mosaics would create a further meeting place<br />
as well as a play feature.<br />
Careful choice of the style of both the seats and bins would help to give the<br />
park a facelift. (See the design palette).<br />
Cost estimate: £17,000<br />
82<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.5 Design Palette<br />
As the <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens has a very different character to both <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
and <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. The design palette should enhance the rather wild<br />
character of the park whist being both robust and contemporary in feel.<br />
The street furniture should be linked to the design of the entrances with the<br />
choice of colour and/ or finish.<br />
• Entrances<br />
The design, materials and finish will be determined as the design is<br />
developed, however a couple of preliminary sketch ideas are shown below. It<br />
would be appropriate to introduce some colour into the boundary treatment of<br />
this park to contrast with the woodland backdrop. Harmonising colours could<br />
be combined with the neutrals of galvanised and tee washed steel and<br />
perhaps oak bollards and/or stone walling. An Artist/ Blacksmith could work<br />
with local schools to develop the ideas here.<br />
Examples of robust stone and metalwork.<br />
This sketch shows ‘trees and grass’ in metalwork and green oak bollards.<br />
This alternative includes robust stone walling and a more figurative metalwork<br />
design<br />
83<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
• Seats and bins<br />
Its woodland character should again be enhanced by the choice of seats and<br />
bins.<br />
The bins should be simple in design, robust in construction and<br />
metal for durability.<br />
Timber is appropriate for the seats in this location. By choosing green oak<br />
and very large sections of timber, this would be both durable and vandal<br />
resistant as well as a sustainable choice.<br />
84<br />
Green oak bench from Caledonia Play<br />
Sitting blocks of sculpted green oak by<br />
Chris Nangle Furniture.<br />
Grouped, they would create a low key<br />
meeting place or singly they could be<br />
located adjacent to play equipment in the<br />
woodland where a bench would be too big.<br />
The block shown has a charred finish<br />
• Signage interpretation boards and way-marking<br />
As referred to in the section about <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, a family of signage<br />
should follow through all three parks. Any metalwork elements should be<br />
painted black for continuity<br />
Fitzpatrick Woolmer lectern style display<br />
board which would be suitable for the<br />
historical information board<br />
An example of graphics style which<br />
suitable for information boards<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
85<br />
‘Stylos’ finger post by William Smith<br />
appropriate for both signing directions<br />
within and between the parks.<br />
The posts should be painted black with<br />
white lettering<br />
Timber posts appropriate for way-marking<br />
the trails<br />
• Paving and Steps<br />
Paving should generally all be tarmac with simple concrete edgings for ease<br />
of maintenance. Steps should be pre-cast concrete and handrails galvanised<br />
steel. Again these are chosen for ease of maintenance.<br />
At the entrances, however, the tarmac could be locally enhanced with insets<br />
of decorative paving which could be developed with an artist and community<br />
involvement, and could reflect the woodland character.<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.7 Quick wins<br />
86<br />
• Commission and implement management plan<br />
• Notice board<br />
• Signage<br />
• Install crushed brick paths to existing seats and picnic tables.<br />
• Start to develop play trail: remove youth shelter and install a play log in<br />
bark surfacing.<br />
• Some new seats and bins<br />
• Seating circle<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
7.7 <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens budget estimate<br />
See notes below re. qualifications and exclusions<br />
87<br />
Description<br />
Breakdown<br />
£<br />
Environmental Planning Team<br />
Amount £<br />
including<br />
contingency<br />
Habitat improvement plan 1,000.00<br />
Play 82,000.00<br />
Standard play equipment and surfacing 66,000.00<br />
natural play elements 11,000.00<br />
skate facility 5,000.00<br />
Sport 25,000.00<br />
resurface basketball court 19,000.00<br />
new entrance 6,000.00<br />
Circulation and accessibility 107,000.00<br />
path and steps to Danile Hill 156lm 39,000.00<br />
path and steps to basketball court 65lm 22,000.00<br />
path and steps to slide 65lm 22,000.00<br />
path and steps from Whitehouse Lane 75lm 24,000.00<br />
Boundaries and entrances 187,000.00<br />
main entrances 2no. @20k eack 22,000.00<br />
minor entrances 10no. @7k each 77,000.00<br />
boundaries (stone walling) 200lm @£400/lm 88,000.00<br />
Trails, signage and waymarking 11,000.00<br />
3no Finger posts @2k 7,000.00<br />
15no Bollard posts @£200 3,000.00<br />
1no lecterns @ £500 1,000.00<br />
Seats and bins 17,000.00<br />
Including 12no seats and 3no bins with<br />
associated paving<br />
TOTAL 430,000.00<br />
Qualifications:<br />
• Costs are based on 2010 rates<br />
• Costs are based on traditional competitive tendering to main<br />
contractors<br />
• Contingencies of 10% are included in the breakdown
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Exclusions:<br />
• vat<br />
• Professional fees<br />
• Building regulations and planning fees<br />
• Inflation<br />
88<br />
Environmental Planning Team
WHITEHOUSE LANE<br />
4<br />
5<br />
FOX ROAD<br />
1 Improve habitat<br />
2 Improve play<br />
3 Improve sport<br />
Skate bowl removed and replaced<br />
with basket swing.<br />
New skate ledges installed<br />
4 Upgrade boundaries and entrances<br />
5 New trails, signs and way-marking<br />
6 New seats and bins<br />
Youth shelter removed<br />
and replaced with play log<br />
1<br />
1<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4<br />
6<br />
2<br />
2<br />
Slide<br />
6<br />
2<br />
PORTLAND COURT<br />
3<br />
1<br />
Basketball court<br />
DANIEL HILL<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4<br />
YEOMANS ROAD<br />
CLEVELAND ST<br />
CARNARVON ST<br />
Short grass<br />
Wild flowers in long grass<br />
Woodland and trees<br />
Existing paths<br />
New paths<br />
Stepped route<br />
Main entrance with boundary<br />
Minor entrance with boundary<br />
Existing vehicular and pedestrian entrance<br />
Existing pedestrian entrance<br />
New pedestrian entrance<br />
Play route<br />
Meeting place<br />
Cycle route<br />
PENISTONE ROAD<br />
PHILADELPHIA GARDENS<br />
N<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens Masterplan<br />
2<br />
4<br />
5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
New play equipment in<br />
play area<br />
5<br />
6<br />
4
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
8.0 Smaller Green Spaces<br />
The Masterplan brief highlighted several smaller green spaces in the vicinity<br />
of the three main parks considered in this document, namely Lower Walkley<br />
Green Space, Upperthorpe Peace Gardens, Oxford Road Open Space and<br />
Sydney Road Open Space. These are shown on the location plan in the<br />
introduction. (1.1)<br />
The possibility of developing green routes between the main parks which<br />
would link up with the smaller green spaces was explored, however, it quickly<br />
became clear that the potential to develop anything meaningful was small.<br />
Lower Walkley Green Space, in particular, as can be seen from the map, is<br />
located quite a distance from any of the main parks. (It is actually closer to<br />
Ruskin <strong>Park</strong>).<br />
Similarly Sydney Road open space, although relatively close to <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
and <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, is not actually on a route to either.<br />
The three main parks, in particular <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens and <strong>Ponderosa</strong> are<br />
used as through routes, although, not particularly by people travelling from<br />
one of the parks to one or more of the others. The through routes are mostly<br />
short cuts and/ or scenic routes to work, school, university and/or shops, the<br />
parks being seen as separate destinations. Consequently, developing a<br />
green route between the parks would have questionable value.<br />
Furthermore, the smaller sites don’t generally lie on direct routes between the<br />
parks. Although Upperthorpe Peace Gardens (off Daniel Hill) does appear at<br />
first glance to lie between <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens and <strong>Ponderosa</strong>, a detour<br />
would be necessary to Daniel Hill for anyone who had walked or cycled<br />
through <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens.<br />
The very nature of the smaller green spaces, also, means that they are mainly<br />
of value and interest to residents who live in close proximity to them.<br />
The consultation event carried out by ‘Art in the <strong>Park</strong>’highlighted some<br />
possible actions an/or improvements for the individual spaces. (See<br />
Appendix 3 Mini Green Space Celebrations).<br />
89<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 1<br />
Land ownership<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 2<br />
Additional Project Information<br />
• Crimean War memorial<br />
• <strong>Ponderosa</strong> Football specification<br />
• Boathouse feasibility for <strong>Crookes</strong><br />
<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Crimean War memorial<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> Football specification<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Boathouse feasibility for <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 3<br />
‘Art in the <strong>Park</strong>’ reports<br />
• Consultation Report<br />
• ‘Mini Green Spaces Celebrations’ report<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 4<br />
Stakeholder Consultation Summary<br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 5<br />
Minutes of the meeting regarding<br />
improvements for events on the <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
Environmental Planning Team
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens Masterplan<br />
______________________________________________<br />
Appendix 6<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Fishing in the lake - minutes from meetings<br />
Environmental Planning Team
1<br />
13<br />
10<br />
23<br />
2<br />
5<br />
349<br />
1<br />
224<br />
92<br />
130.8m<br />
Legend<br />
IVY DRIVE<br />
220<br />
67<br />
4<br />
1 to 11<br />
63<br />
339<br />
Gymnasium<br />
200<br />
HARCOURT ROAD<br />
Tennis Courts<br />
All Other Committee<br />
188<br />
IVY GROVE Medical Centre<br />
82<br />
33<br />
24<br />
327<br />
323<br />
72<br />
184<br />
10 to 14<br />
129.4m<br />
45<br />
The Goodwin Sports Centre<br />
(The University of Sheffield)<br />
137.2m<br />
CROOKESMOOR ROAD<br />
313<br />
62<br />
Old Dam House<br />
PO<br />
211<br />
127.9m<br />
55 27<br />
D Fn<br />
TRANSACTION_TYPE, COMMITTEE<br />
¬<br />
Water<br />
Estates<br />
Highways<br />
Housing<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s<br />
Education<br />
Health<br />
Planning & Transportation<br />
Disposals<br />
Leases<br />
0 10 20<br />
Meters<br />
Shelter<br />
182<br />
180<br />
35<br />
Shelter<br />
LB<br />
Football Pitch<br />
170<br />
52<br />
12<br />
Methodist Church<br />
10<br />
8<br />
The Cottage<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
8b<br />
197<br />
6<br />
17<br />
6b<br />
Shelter<br />
2<br />
267<br />
FS<br />
School<br />
131.8m<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong><br />
CROOKESMOOR<br />
358<br />
Sluice<br />
Ward Bdy<br />
Playground<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
360<br />
574<br />
TCBs<br />
Boating Lake<br />
ESS<br />
558<br />
Boating Lake<br />
CROOKES VALLEY ROAD<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
TCBs<br />
Bowling Green<br />
1823<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
Museum<br />
The <strong>Ponderosa</strong> (<strong>Park</strong> (public))<br />
126.9m<br />
D Fn<br />
MUSHROOM LANE<br />
Shelter<br />
Bowling Green<br />
PCs<br />
124.4m<br />
Rain Gauge<br />
Shaft<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey map with the permission o f the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) C rown Copyright 2009 Unauth orised reprod uction infringes Crow n Copyright and may lead to prosecutio n or Civil Proceedings. OS License No . 100018816. 2010<br />
Obelisk<br />
MUSHROOM LANE<br />
Bandstand<br />
122.4m<br />
Weston
Plot Scale<br />
1 : 2500<br />
Survey Scale<br />
1 : 1250
18<br />
Walk<br />
FB<br />
18to26<br />
BURGOYNE ROAD<br />
50<br />
1<br />
80.2m<br />
2 to 16<br />
FB<br />
88<br />
HILL<br />
89.0m<br />
90.8m<br />
93.6m<br />
84.1m<br />
70.4m<br />
Playground<br />
UPPERTHORPE CLOSE<br />
8<br />
19<br />
8to16<br />
WHITEHOUSE LANE<br />
15 to 27<br />
28<br />
17<br />
FOX ROAD<br />
26<br />
Legend<br />
2<br />
22<br />
26<br />
SHERDE ROAD<br />
71<br />
7<br />
29 to 43<br />
45 to<br />
75<br />
BRANDRETH ROAD<br />
129<br />
BLAKE<br />
3<br />
14<br />
5<br />
15<br />
LB<br />
81<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
Daniel Hill Walk<br />
20<br />
4<br />
77<br />
121<br />
119<br />
72 70<br />
83<br />
87<br />
113<br />
62<br />
60<br />
FOX ROAD<br />
DANIEL HILL TERRACE<br />
91<br />
SM<br />
TRANSACTION_TYPE, COMMITTEE<br />
¬<br />
Water<br />
Estates<br />
Highways<br />
Housing<br />
<strong>Park</strong>s<br />
1<br />
All Other Committee<br />
Education<br />
Health<br />
1<br />
16<br />
Planning & Transportation<br />
Disposals<br />
Leases<br />
20<br />
18<br />
0 12.5 25<br />
Meters<br />
71<br />
2<br />
PO<br />
56<br />
50<br />
105<br />
99<br />
40<br />
13<br />
1<br />
101<br />
2<br />
15<br />
52<br />
73<br />
24<br />
10<br />
63<br />
2<br />
UPPERTHORPE<br />
46<br />
PORTLAND COURT<br />
12<br />
78.6m<br />
87.5m<br />
1<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
TCB<br />
Playground<br />
WOOLLEN LANE<br />
54<br />
52<br />
3<br />
58<br />
44<br />
DANIEL HILL<br />
Nursing Home<br />
21<br />
34<br />
Car <strong>Park</strong><br />
11<br />
11<br />
10<br />
12<br />
12<br />
Laundry<br />
23<br />
YEOMANS ROAD<br />
Public Baths<br />
1<br />
19<br />
26<br />
22<br />
Chy<br />
Surgery<br />
Club<br />
4<br />
24<br />
19<br />
9<br />
PC<br />
2<br />
76.5m<br />
Club<br />
15<br />
SA Citadel<br />
CLEVELAND STREET<br />
5<br />
18<br />
11<br />
23<br />
WESTMORELAND STREET<br />
20<br />
26<br />
18<br />
6<br />
Library<br />
10<br />
19<br />
2<br />
FLORA STREET<br />
MIDVALE AVENUE<br />
MIDVALE CLOSE<br />
11<br />
29<br />
12<br />
3<br />
252<br />
16<br />
9<br />
20<br />
73.3m<br />
161<br />
PH<br />
Tramway<br />
CARNARVON STREET<br />
31<br />
37<br />
240<br />
2<br />
PORTLAND<br />
68<br />
10<br />
12<br />
1<br />
64<br />
32<br />
7<br />
38<br />
BARRACK LANE<br />
238<br />
40<br />
STRAW LANE<br />
6<br />
38<br />
151<br />
Works<br />
to<br />
12<br />
WB<br />
PENISTONE ROAD<br />
Builder's Yard<br />
INFIRMARY ROAD<br />
1<br />
PO<br />
49<br />
LB<br />
50<br />
2<br />
72.5m<br />
141<br />
6<br />
Works<br />
PH<br />
River Don<br />
BALACLAVA ROAD<br />
8<br />
Works<br />
216<br />
24<br />
Works<br />
22<br />
2<br />
26<br />
20<br />
131<br />
219<br />
212<br />
PHILADELPHIA GARDENS<br />
Medical<br />
Centre<br />
TCBs<br />
210<br />
41<br />
206<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
1<br />
Playground<br />
17<br />
Works<br />
WEST DON STREET<br />
PHILADELPHIA GROVE<br />
62<br />
PH<br />
27<br />
Works<br />
117<br />
66<br />
39<br />
192a<br />
15<br />
21<br />
23<br />
11<br />
1<br />
2<br />
to<br />
71.0m<br />
Apollo Works<br />
LOCK STREET<br />
PHILADELPHIA DRIVE<br />
2<br />
9<br />
6<br />
Vicarage<br />
6<br />
188<br />
1<br />
113<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
Foundry<br />
Kelvin Buildings<br />
182<br />
56<br />
1<br />
10<br />
Foundry<br />
9<br />
50<br />
Works<br />
11<br />
CROSS GILPIN STREET<br />
166<br />
15<br />
Works<br />
Portland Buildings<br />
9<br />
Tramway<br />
11<br />
9<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
18<br />
El Sub Sta<br />
LB<br />
152<br />
61.0m<br />
Works<br />
17 to 27<br />
Works<br />
Works<br />
ALBERT TERRACE ROAD<br />
Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey map with the permission o f the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (C) C rown Copyright 2009 Unauth orised reprod uction infringes Crow n Copyright and may lead to prosecutio n or Civil Proceedings. OS License No . 100018816. 2010<br />
GILPIN STREET<br />
52.7m<br />
110<br />
112<br />
PORTLAND STREET<br />
104<br />
WB<br />
Works<br />
138<br />
INFIRMARY ROAD<br />
TCB<br />
Weir<br />
GILPIN LANE<br />
Works
REPORT TO P+C MANAGEMENT TEAM<br />
November 2008<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL REINSTATEMENT<br />
1. Purpose of Report<br />
1.1 The purpose of this report is to advise Management Team of the current position and<br />
history of the project<br />
1.2 Further to the above the report aims to outline current constraints and obligations in<br />
relation to the listed consent attached to the monument.<br />
1.3 It also aims to highlight the potential financial implications of the reinstatement<br />
proposals.<br />
2. Background<br />
2.1 SCC has responsibility for the Grade II listed Crimea Memorial (CWM) which is<br />
currently in storage at Staniforth Road depot. This monument originally stood at<br />
Moorhead and was moved to the Botanical gardens in the late 1950’s to enable the<br />
road layout to be changed.<br />
2.2 The consultants who advised on the restoration of the Botanical Gardens felt the<br />
statue was inappropriate and its removal would allow an original fountain to be reinstated<br />
in the gardens. Therefore as part of the restoration of the Botanical<br />
Gardens, planning permission was obtained to move her to another site. She was<br />
dismantled and moved in to storage with the intention she would be re-erected in the<br />
city centre as part of the new redevelopment. Discussions were held during 2002<br />
between <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside and the City Centre Team to achieve that end.<br />
2.3 A planning application, with a accompanying letter support from the Executive<br />
Director of DEL was made to move the monument in October 2003. The letter<br />
stated that the Executive Director supported the re-location of the monument to the<br />
city centre and that he was confident funding could be found for the work.<br />
2.4 The listed consent received in April 2004 to remove the monument from the Botanical<br />
Gardens included the stipulation that:<br />
“The restoration works shall be carried out within a period of 2 years of the Memorial<br />
having been dismantled (or alternative period to be agreed in writing with the Local<br />
Planning Authority)” and “The precise location of the restored Memorial within<br />
Barkers Pool, or within some other appropriate civic/public space in close proximity<br />
thereto, shall have been secured within two years of the date of this consent (or<br />
1
alternative period to be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority) and in<br />
consultation with the Local Planning Authority and English Heritage.<br />
2.5 The statue was moved out from the Botanical Gardens and placed in store at the<br />
council deport at Staniforth Road where she remains, pending agreement as to<br />
where she can be placed.<br />
2.6 This situation effectively means that the City Council as an organisation in default of<br />
its commitments in relation to the listed consent. It is not known what implications this<br />
will have for the authority.<br />
2.7 A brief chronology of the memorials history follows:<br />
• Memorial of gothic design erected at Moorhead in the city centre in 1862, “in<br />
memory of Sheffield soldiers who died in the Crimean War”. This original<br />
memorial was on a grand scale and in excess of 17m high.<br />
• Between 1957 and 1960 this memorial was dismantled for “street improvement<br />
purposes” and a much reduced form of the monument was erected in the<br />
Botanical Gardens, approximately 6m in height.<br />
• Some unused sections of the monument were sited in other parts of the city;<br />
other very decorative sections remain untraceable following this move. Research<br />
suggests that these were sold off in order to finance the relocation.<br />
• Monument Grade II listed in 1973.<br />
• During the development of the restoration plan for the Botanical Gardens circa<br />
2000, the landscape consultants suggested that the memorial was inappropriate<br />
for the gardens and proposed the reinstatement of a decorative fountain in the<br />
location occupied by the memorial.<br />
• During 2002 the programme for Botanical Gardens restoration made the<br />
requirement to dismantle and remove the monument a priority and proposals to<br />
site the memorial in Barkers Pool as part of the re-development of the city centre,<br />
(one position bordering the adjacent area of the proposed new retail quarter, the<br />
other closer to the junction with Pinstone Street), were actively considered with<br />
Officers from the City Centre Development Unit.<br />
• On July 23rd 2003 a Cabinet report recommended that proposals for the<br />
relocation of the Crimea Memorial to Barker's Pool be included in the designs for<br />
the redesigned public open space around the City Hall, on the understanding that<br />
the public would be further consulted about this idea.<br />
• On the 2 nd April 2004 listed building consent was gained to remove the memorial<br />
and put it into temporary storage prior to re-siting with the condition that it be reerected<br />
in a prominent city centre position within 2 years.<br />
• A subsequent report taken to Cabinet on the 12 th May 2004 recorded that the<br />
relocation of the memorial would not included as part of the Barkers Pool scheme<br />
for three reasons:-<br />
1. The proposal received a relatively low approval in public consultation<br />
2. Until further detail emerges regarding the layout and form of the New<br />
Retail Quarter it will not be possible to secure an exact location for the<br />
memorial<br />
2
3. Heritage Lottery Funding has been secured for the partial restoration and<br />
removal into storage of the memorial. However, the budget identified for<br />
the public realm improvements cannot meet the additional costs involved<br />
in relocating the memorial into Barker’s Pool.<br />
• In late 2004 the memorial was given a basic clean and repair, dismantled and<br />
fully recorded by Alan Bridgman stonemason, then put into storage at the<br />
Staniforth Road depot. The memorial remains at this location to date.<br />
• While the proposal to relocate the memorial in the City Centre was initially given a<br />
positive response, on further consideration the consensus of planning officers,<br />
senior officers in the Regenerations Projects Design Team and, elected members<br />
involved appeared to ultimately not consider this location to be actually suitable or<br />
feasible. It was also reported that public consultation revealed lukewarm support<br />
for the idea.<br />
• Unfortunately this decision making process does not appear to be fully<br />
documented, although some e-mail communication is on record.<br />
• An alternative site was then considered, the General Cemetery at Sharrow. While<br />
this had the support of the Friends of the General Cemetery, agreement could not<br />
be reached on location, the Friends wanting the monument outside the Cemetery,<br />
which was not acceptable to the Conservation Officer.<br />
• In December 2007 SD&PM were asked to undertake a Feasibilty Study on the<br />
options available for the reinstatement of the statue in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
3 Feasibility Study<br />
3.1 <strong>Park</strong>s and Countryside Development Team’s identified a small amount of funding in<br />
late 2007 to commission SD &PM to assess the restoration options for the statue<br />
and to examine the feasibility of whether the terraces in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> park might<br />
prove a suitable location for the Crimea Memorial. This location was suggested given<br />
its previous connection with the Crimea War as a pair of cannons, thought to have<br />
been retrieved from the Russian Army during the Crimean War, were originally sited<br />
in this location.<br />
3.2 Initial discussions with the “Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>” group received a positive<br />
response to the proposal. Due to the potentially high profile nature of the project no<br />
public consultation or publicity has taken place until the viability of the project in<br />
terms of both design and cost has been evaluated.<br />
3.3 Work to date by the SD & PM Architects Practice has included research and survey<br />
of the remaining elements of the monument which are still available, the location of<br />
other remnants, surveys of the site topography and sketch design work in both two<br />
and three dimensions. The design has aimed to better reflect the original proportions<br />
of the Moorhead original, and two height options have considered. It is the opinion of<br />
the project team that this work has confirmed the potential viability of the proposal.<br />
3.4 In addition the original estimates of the cost of re-assembling the monument were reexamined<br />
and the original contractor was asked to give a budget estimate for re-<br />
3
assembling the monument and putting back a short length of column to improve the<br />
proportions of the monument.<br />
4 Future works<br />
4.1 The proposal will initially need a thorough ground investigation and associated desk<br />
top report to evaluate the suitability of the site in engineering terms. The location is<br />
known to be of “formed ground” and as such this element is of vital importance.<br />
4.2 The work would then comprise the installation of suitably engineered foundations and<br />
the formation of a concrete core structure to support the memorial and provide a<br />
suitable base to fix the memorial stonework to.<br />
4.3 The statue and base currently in storage would then be re-erected on site using<br />
approximately 50% of additional new stonework in order to produce an approved new<br />
design. This new configuration would enable the memorial to display suitable<br />
proportions relative to both its original scale and new location.<br />
4.4 The new structure would include the provision of a central steel reinforcement bar<br />
which would run from foundation to top of the monument. The existing stonework<br />
would be repaired as necessary during the works. The new structure would include<br />
the addition of four Gryphons’ to the corners of the structure to match those on the<br />
original memorial.<br />
4.5 The works would include surrounding stone access steps forming a low plinth and a<br />
paved surround in the immediate area to provide enhanced access to the memorial<br />
for the public. In addition new seating and interpretation sign would be erected and<br />
work undertaken to the surrounding planting areas.<br />
5 Capital Implications<br />
5.1 A quotation has been obtained from Maysand the original contractors engaged to<br />
take apart the monument. They conclude that to re-assemble the monument and<br />
introduce addition decorative elements would cost in the region of £226,000 (2008<br />
prices). In addition landscape works to enhance the setting of the monument would<br />
be required which are estimated to cost an additional £65,000. On top of this sum<br />
professional fees would be required, giving a total sum in excess of £300k.<br />
6 Revenue Implications<br />
6.1 Limited funding has been secured to produce this report and produce a basic<br />
feasibility study and Officer Time has been found from within the Project Team to<br />
coordinate this piece of work.<br />
4
6.2 To progress this work any further will require dedicated Officer time to develop the<br />
proposal, obtain the necessary approvals, undertake consultation and seek additional<br />
funding. This work could occupy 50% of an PDO’s time for a period of 12 months.<br />
6.3 The restored monument will require some additional maintenance, but this is likely to<br />
be a relatively insignificant in scale.<br />
7 Funding Options<br />
7.1 Funding for the restoration of individual Grade II monuments and memorials is<br />
difficult to obtain, particularly of the scale required in this case. There are some very<br />
small grants available for monument restoration, but the only programme which<br />
might has the scale of the funding required would be a bid to the Heritage Lottery<br />
Fund under the “Heritage Grants” programme.<br />
7.2 The landfill tax is another source of potential funding to cover some of the cost, but<br />
there are a number of projects in P&C which will be approaching this fund in the near<br />
future and only a minority are likely to succeed.<br />
7.3 There are several reasons why a bid to the Lottery is unlikely to be successful:-.<br />
• Firstly, the original Lottery award to the Botanical Gardens was intended to<br />
include an element for both dismantling and reinstating the memorial which has<br />
been expended.<br />
• Secondly, there are a number of potential bids to this fund from across the city<br />
and it would need to be agreed at a corporate level that this bid is a priority for the<br />
city to enable to succeed.<br />
• Thirdly, the criteria for this programme requires a much more comprehensive<br />
approach to heritage projects. They must include a supporting educational<br />
programme and demonstrate wide scale public support and involvement , which<br />
could add another £200k to cost of a project and impact of the ongoing revenue<br />
costs.<br />
8 Conclusions<br />
8.1 The City Council is in default of its planning conditions and it is unclear what action, if<br />
any, English Heritage may take over this breach at a corporate level.<br />
8.2 As can be seen from the history of this statue, the responsibility for finding a new<br />
home for the CWM has been accepted in the past as an issue for DEL to resolve<br />
and this joint responsibility needs to be reaffirmed and accepted, rather than it being<br />
seen as an issue for P&C to resolve<br />
5
8.3 In view of the likely difficulty in obtaining funding, the most pragmatic option may be<br />
to argue that in the monument is in safe storage and this is the best protection the<br />
authority can offer the monument in the short to medium term.<br />
8.4 It is suggested that this issue is raised at DMT to ensure joint responsibility is<br />
accepted and a shared course of action is devised and agreed by all parties.<br />
Andy Catling<br />
6
Photomontage of proposed relocation in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Crimean War Memorial in<br />
previous location
STONEGUARD (MIDLANDS) LTD<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL, BOTANICAL GARDENS, SHEFFIELD<br />
SURVEY REPORT AND PHOTOGRAPHS<br />
JULY 2004<br />
CONDITION OF EXISTING MEMORIAL AT TIME OF ORIGINAL<br />
SURVEY JANUARY 2001.<br />
The author was asked to survey the existing memorial within the Botanical Gardens<br />
by Sheffield City Council Architects Department early January 2001. Our brief was to<br />
inspect the condition of the existing stones, consider the possibility of dismantling the<br />
monument and submit budget costing's for the dismantling works, rebuilding works<br />
and the restoration of delaminated and spalled masonry.<br />
The monument was surveyed from pavement level with the assumption that the<br />
masonry insitu was the complete memorial, it was assumed that the masonry had been<br />
constructed in a traditional manner against we assumed a brick backing structure. On<br />
this basis we believed it would be possible to dismantle the masonry course by course,<br />
successfully reclaiming the stones with minimal damage to the components.<br />
During August 2001 our Budget Costing for these works was submitted.<br />
BUDGET COSTING FOR THE REINSTATEMENT OF THE COMPLETE<br />
MEMORIAL NOVEMBER 2001.<br />
Following receipt of photographs of the complete memorial we were asked to provide<br />
a Budget Costing for the rebuilding and restoration of the existing masonry<br />
components and replacement of the missing components to allow the complete<br />
reconstruction of the original monument.<br />
This costing was submitted on the 26 th November 2001 based on the photographic<br />
evidence available at the time.<br />
PRE TENDER MARCH 2003 & FEBRUARY 2004.<br />
(FIQURES 1 TO 7)<br />
Following receipt of tender documentation from Waterers Landscapes Plc (March<br />
2003). Our estimate of costs for the dismantling the existing structure within the<br />
Botanical Gardens now know to have been rebuilt in the 1950’s was submitted.<br />
Further documentation was received from the successful contractor Brambledown<br />
Landscape Services Ltd (February 2004). Our estimate of costs for dismantling the<br />
existing structure (Option A) and budget costing for rebuilding the complete structure<br />
(Option B) was submitted.<br />
PRE CONTRACT APRIL 2004.<br />
Following a joint meeting between the Client, Sheffield City Council, Brambledown<br />
and Stoneguard the contract to dismantle the existing structure was agreed on the<br />
basis that works would be complete within week commencing 24 th May 2004.<br />
AUTHOR: DAVID ALAN BRIDGMAN<br />
Page 1 of 5<br />
01/02/2007
STONEGUARD (MIDLANDS) LTD<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL, BOTANICAL GARDENS, SHEFFIELD<br />
SURVEY REPORT AND PHOTOGRAPHS<br />
Arrangements for the erection of the scaffolding, cranage and the provision of the<br />
masons and labour to execute the works were now in place.<br />
DISMANTLING WORKS MAY 2004.<br />
The scaffolding was erected during week commencing the 3 rd May (figures 8 to 15<br />
record the condition of the statue)<br />
The pre-cleaning works using the Doff System to remove the soluble dirt deposits and<br />
algae were completed shortly afterwards. (figures 16 to 25 record the condition of the<br />
pre-cleaned statue)<br />
Following close inspection of the statue from the standing scaffold upon completion<br />
of the pre-cleaning works it became apparent that extensive insitu repairs in a red<br />
cement mortar had been carried out after the last rebuilding works (figures 23-25).<br />
Damage to the bed and perpend joints had also occurred during we assume the<br />
original dismantling works and this has now resulted in oversized joints pointed in<br />
again a red cement mortar (figures 20-21 & 22-24).<br />
Dismantling works to the statue commenced during week commencing the 10 th May<br />
and the head and shoulders and sword were successfully removed within the<br />
estimated time (figures 26 & 27).<br />
Although the statue had been rebuilt in cement mortar the individual stones forming<br />
the statue were successfully dismantled stone by stone, the existing ferrous and slate<br />
fixings were also removed as the works progressed. (figures 28-30 & 35-37).<br />
These stones weighing between 500kg and 1500kg were lifted by locating a Lewis<br />
Pin’s into a pre-drilled hole in the sky facing surface of the stones to allow removal to<br />
ground using the adjacent standing mobile crane (figures 29 &30).<br />
The only area of the statue requiring substantial masonry replacement was found to be<br />
the previously insitu repaired lions head, details and dimensions have been recorded<br />
for future replacement in natural stone (figures 31-34).<br />
At this stage the works were progressing well and on programme.<br />
During week commencing 17 th May works began to dismantle the plinth and during<br />
attempted careful removal of one of the buttress/corner cornice stones damage by<br />
spalling to the adjacent coping stone occurred (figures 38 & 39).<br />
Upon close inspection of the exposed concrete the extent of the concrete backing<br />
structure now became evident (figures 40-42).<br />
A meeting was held on the 19 th May between all parties and it was agreed that further<br />
trials needed to be undertake to determine the extent of the concrete backing structure,<br />
core hole trials were arranged and these took place on Monday 24 th May.<br />
The concrete slab was established as being 220mm thick sat on a steel plate, the sides<br />
of the concrete behind the masonry were established to be 600mm thick (figures<br />
41&42).<br />
Consideration at this time was being given to breaking the concrete using mechanical<br />
plant following abortive attempts to break the concrete using hand held tools, further<br />
investigation resulted in the recommendation to employ hydraulic chain saw cutting<br />
techniques to cut the stone from the concrete to limit the amount of stone potentially<br />
damaged during alternative demolition works using mechanical means. Subsequent<br />
sample trials using the chain saw were successful and this was then adopted at the<br />
best method to reclaim the masonry forming the external face of the memorial plinth.<br />
AUTHOR: DAVID ALAN BRIDGMAN<br />
Page 2 of 5<br />
01/02/2007
STONEGUARD (MIDLANDS) LTD<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL, BOTANICAL GARDENS, SHEFFIELD<br />
SURVEY REPORT AND PHOTOGRAPHS<br />
Chain saw cutting works commenced during week commencing 31 st May and the top<br />
course was successfully cut from the backing concrete (figures 43-45).<br />
Ring saw cutting methods were also employed to cut to a maximum depth of 280mm<br />
through the perpends and bed joints of each of the courses to reduce the damage to<br />
arris of the stones during subsequent removal (figure48).<br />
The second course was also removed using chain and ring saw methods (figures 50<br />
&51).<br />
Following removal of the top two courses attempts were made using hand held<br />
masons tools to expose the back of the vertical backing concrete and the bottom of the<br />
concrete slab. It was not possible to expose the top of the inscribed memorial stone<br />
and it now apparent that this stone is over 500mm thick, which together with the<br />
concrete backing we now estimate the total thickness exceed 800mm. Further<br />
exposure of the concrete now confirms the slab is reinforced and sat on a steel plate<br />
(figure 52).<br />
The time taken to remove the stone and concrete by hand is now deemed to be<br />
unproductive and following further discussions and advice from the specialist<br />
concrete sub contractor an agreement is made to remove the exposed slab and vertical<br />
backing concrete using hydraulic concrete bursting methods (figures53-55 ).<br />
During week commencing 12 th July the initial bursting methods were successful and<br />
the concrete slab broke away from the steel plate, however the steel reinforcement<br />
cast into the concrete prevented complete separation of the concrete resulting in the<br />
complete remaining slab moving on top of the steel plate below (figure56 ).<br />
The reinforcement bars then had to be individually cut to allow the concrete to broken<br />
away from the outer edge of the slab (figure57).<br />
This method continued until the slab was reduced to weight that could be safely lifted<br />
by the mobile crane to the adjacent rubbish skip and finally the supporting steel plates<br />
were exposed (figure 58).<br />
Following removal of the steel plates it was possible to inspect the internal core of the<br />
monument, it is now confirmed that the concrete has been poured and vibrated<br />
between the outer masonry and shuttering timbers (figures59-61).<br />
Further attempts to remove the vertical backing concrete continued using the busting<br />
techniques this was successful on three faces (figures62-65), this however resulted in<br />
damage to the masonry on the fourth left hand side panel (figures65-67).<br />
Further works using the bursting method were suspended and it was agreed that the<br />
remaining works would continue using chain saw cutting methods. Successful<br />
removal of the remaining stones was achieved by cutting all the joints (bottom, side<br />
and back) to allow removal by crane of the individual stones (figures68-71).<br />
Due to the maximum depth of cutting achievable with the chain saw it was not<br />
possible to remove the masonry forming the inset panels from the concrete. These<br />
were removed complete with the backing concrete following complete separation<br />
from the adjacent structure by chain saw cutting. A wagon with hiab was used to lift<br />
these stones from the structure and all three remaining inset panels (maximum weight<br />
5000kg) were successfully lifted on the vehicle (figures72-76, 79-81).<br />
The damaged inset panel (5500kg) was removed using the same method and<br />
deposited in the adjacent skip (this stone remains on site pending confirmation the<br />
masonry is surplus to requirements) (figures77&78).<br />
AUTHOR: DAVID ALAN BRIDGMAN<br />
Page 3 of 5<br />
01/02/2007
STONEGUARD (MIDLANDS) LTD<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL, BOTANICAL GARDENS, SHEFFIELD<br />
SURVEY REPORT AND PHOTOGRAPHS<br />
The three reclaimed panels have be removed to J Oldham’s quarry and it is proposed<br />
that the face of the stone be cut away from the concrete using a primary saw capable<br />
of cutting through the full height of the stone. These stones (500mm thick) then being<br />
reduced to bed thickness of 150mm for reconstruction resulting in the remainder of<br />
the masonry being available to replace the one missing panel and other stones<br />
requiring replacement following the final survey of the required bed heights to<br />
achieve completion of the rebuilding works (figure74).<br />
The final two courses were successfully removed during week commencing 28 th July<br />
using chain saw cutting methods leaving the remaining concrete backing for removal<br />
by the main contractor (figures82-89).<br />
All the stone with the exception of the three panels taken to quarry are currently in<br />
storage at our premises in Rugeley (figures90-92).<br />
During week commencing 12 July all the existing mortar was removed from the joints<br />
of the stones forming the statue and plinth (figures93-96).<br />
Final polishing by hand will allow the statue to be rebuilt in the works to finally<br />
determine the extent of the remedial works to the statue (figures97-98).<br />
PROPOSAL FOR REBUILDING WORKS<br />
A full dimensional survey was undertaken prior to dismantling the memorial plinth by<br />
our drawing office and drawings have been prepared on AutoCAD. An individual<br />
drawing has been produced for each course together with a section through the<br />
structure.<br />
Section through records the individual courses as A to F.<br />
Course A being the top stone forming the coping stone.<br />
We propose to base our costing for the complete restoration on the following<br />
guidelines.<br />
1. That all profiled stones have been reclaimed but will require re-cutting to<br />
allow re-construction.<br />
2. That the inset panels are reduced to a bed thickness of 150mm.<br />
3. The damaged panel is reclaimed by reducing the bed (item2) and reusing the<br />
stone salvaged from the back of one of the existing panels.<br />
4. The buttress stones are rebuilt as cladding resulting in two new perpends in<br />
each course.<br />
5. Buttress stones will be cut from the nearest stone in course height to achieve<br />
the original height of the original memorial plinth (i.e. course B from course F,<br />
course C from course D, course D from inset panels, course E from course C)<br />
6. Areas of spalled masonry are repaired by indenting re-claimed stone re-carved<br />
to original line and or profile.<br />
AUTHOR: DAVID ALAN BRIDGMAN<br />
Page 4 of 5<br />
01/02/2007
STONEGUARD (MIDLANDS) LTD<br />
CRIMEA WAR MEMORIAL, BOTANICAL GARDENS, SHEFFIELD<br />
SURVEY REPORT AND PHOTOGRAPHS<br />
AUTHOR: DAVID ALAN BRIDGMAN<br />
Page 5 of 5<br />
01/02/2007
From: Kent Emma (DEL)<br />
Sent: 29 December 2008 16:50<br />
To: Catling Andy<br />
Subject: FW: Crimea War Memorial<br />
______________________________________________<br />
From: Kent Emma (DEL)<br />
Sent: 18 May 2006 16:09<br />
To: Neild-Banks Liz<br />
Subject: FW: Crimea War Memorial<br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: Stayte Miriam (DEL)<br />
Sent: 18 May 2006 15:31<br />
To: Kent Emma (DEL)<br />
Subject: FW: Crimea War Memorial<br />
Emma - please see below.<br />
The cost of storage was £4,833<br />
Miriam<br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: Lawrence Tom<br />
Sent: 18 May 2006 11:29<br />
To: Stayte Miriam (DEL)<br />
Subject: Crimea War Memorial<br />
Miriam,<br />
Costs below for Crimea War Memorial, I need you to add in for storage.<br />
• Removal of memorial/repairs - £74,665.13<br />
• Removal of stone paving -£6,584.00<br />
• Storage £?<br />
Regards,<br />
Tom<br />
Tom Lawrence BSc (Hons) MSc MRICS<br />
Project Manager<br />
Sheffield Design and Project Management<br />
Development Services<br />
Tel: (0114) 2736189<br />
Fax: (0114) 2736248<br />
Mobile: 07900 676797
PW/03329<br />
CROOKES VALLEY PARK<br />
BOAT HOUSE<br />
FEASIBILITY REPORT<br />
Sheffield Design and Project Management<br />
2-10 Carbrook Hall Road<br />
Sheffield<br />
S9 2DB<br />
0114 2736045
Introduction<br />
The building is sited to the north-west corner of the <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> lake,<br />
at the bottom of a grass bank adjacent to the Dam House Restaurant.<br />
It is thought the building was probably built about 1950, but this has not been<br />
confirmed.<br />
Description<br />
It is a brick smooth rendered structure, with a hipped roof with rosemary tiles.<br />
The roof structure is triangulated trusses so although the internal walls are<br />
substantial they are not believed to be load-bearing, but this needs<br />
confirmation.<br />
The building originally had six large windows with arched heads, but all but<br />
one of these have been partially blocked up and only high level lights remain.<br />
There are also three smaller windows, but two large window openings on the<br />
rear elevation have been blocked up completely.<br />
The building has been subjected to vandalism over many years. Many roof<br />
tiles have been replaced, the cast iron gutter is in place but downpipes are all<br />
missing, and graffiti on the render has had to be painted over.<br />
Consequently windows now have mesh protection and doors are metal-faced.<br />
There is a small chimney which served a fireplace which has been blocked up<br />
except for an air brick.<br />
The building at present is used only as a store for park-related impedimenta,<br />
and although electrical and water facilities are serviced these have been<br />
closed off.<br />
Proposed Refurbishment<br />
The Client (<strong>Park</strong>s and Woodlands/Art in the <strong>Park</strong>) in association with partner<br />
users wishes to put the building back into use for educational purposes.<br />
There is a pool of artists and volunteers wishing to run environmentally<br />
focussed creative activities. These include after-school art and poetry clubs,<br />
craft sessions, and developing fishing activities for young people.<br />
The accommodation required has therefore been identified as:<br />
Toilet accommodation (sufficient for up to twenty adults and young people,<br />
and including disabled facility)<br />
Kitchen/tea-making facilities<br />
Classroom/office space (ideally separate rooms but possibly partitioned)<br />
Hot desk studio/artist space<br />
Possible facility for serving ice-cream, etc.<br />
New heating facility, preferably wood-burning boiler with radiators<br />
Improved insulation.<br />
More natural light is needed in the building but new and existing windows will<br />
require shutters.
Proposed Remodelling and Repairs<br />
The roof requires minor haunching repairs and further new replacement tiles.<br />
Replacement windows may to be in upvc or timber double glazed, Planners<br />
will need to be consulted on preferred materials.<br />
One of the rear former window openings would be re-opened for a new high<br />
level window to serve toilet areas, shown on Drawing 02.<br />
Some length of the full brick wall (215mm) and the partition to the former utility<br />
room are to be removed. Taking the former shelter area into the curtilage of<br />
uthe building will maximise floor space available for a central area of<br />
classroom/display area.<br />
New internal walls proposed would be stud partition except for the wall to<br />
close off the boiler room, which would be 100mm blockwork restrained at<br />
ceiling level.<br />
New kitchenette units comprising sink, cupboard spaces, and electric service<br />
points allow the office to double as a messroom facility.<br />
Two new toilets, one to Part M specification, are provided, one opening off the<br />
classroom area and the other off a rear vented lobby. Storage is provided off<br />
the vented lobby (intended for storage associated with fishing activities) and<br />
off the main area.<br />
To one side a large new room is formed to double as a studio/hot desking<br />
facility, and perhaps for smaller group use.<br />
Internal faces of the external walls will need to be battened with new<br />
plasterboard linings and internal insulation to improve heat and fuel<br />
conservation. There is insulation ion the roof space on top of the ceiling but it<br />
would be expedient to supplement this during works.<br />
The boiler is to be a wood-burning type venting into the former chimney, and<br />
serving a circulatory radiator system.<br />
Floor finishes are suggested to be generally a linoleum (Marmoleum) but with<br />
non-slip vinyl in the toilets and kitchenette, and a heavy duty matting in the<br />
rear lobby and to the door area at the front.<br />
Ceilings are in fair condition but should be re-lined with new plasterboard on<br />
battens or joists to form true surfaces in the new rooms.<br />
There will be issues trying to find the best way to dispose of foul drainage as<br />
there is no adjacent present drain. There are options to be evaluated if the<br />
scheme progresses.<br />
Structural Engineer’s Comments<br />
A visual inspection of the building was carried out on August 2 nd 2010, the<br />
results of which are set out below.<br />
The external walls measure 300mm thick at the door openings. The external<br />
face is covered with a painted cement sand render which is in good condition.<br />
The bottom five courses are un-rendered. There is no evidence of a dampproof<br />
course.<br />
Due to the wall thickness, even allowing for the render and the lack of header<br />
courses visible on the un-plastered internal face it is likely that the walls are of<br />
cavity construction.
The thickness of the wall between the main store and the covered area on the<br />
south-east elevation was not ascertained. However there is a header course<br />
six courses down from the top suggesting a solid wall.<br />
The internal walls are solid brickwork except for a timber stud wall between<br />
the mess room and office. The wall between the mess room and the store<br />
which is only half a brick thick contains a chimney breast.<br />
No major deformation of line or major cracking to any of the walls was<br />
observed. There is visible damp to the internal face of the external wall to the<br />
south east, moisture content readings of 30% were recorded. Externally at<br />
the same location surface water is leaching from the adjacent grassed<br />
embankment and is ponding outside the building.<br />
Concrete lintels span over the door and window openings both externally and<br />
internally to the north-west and south-west elevations. These appear to be<br />
sound except for the window to the south end of the south-west elevation<br />
where the outside face has spalled off. The window heads to the south-east<br />
elevation are arched as are the openings to the covered area to the north-east<br />
elevation.
The floor finish is concrete except for an area near the external door to the<br />
office which is finished with quarry tiles.<br />
The floor is sound except for an area near the external door to the office in the<br />
north-west elevation where the surface is breaking up.<br />
The type of foundation is unknown but is assumed to be strip footings.<br />
The only access to the roof space is via a ceiling hatch in the mess room.<br />
The roof space was not entered. As a result only a limited area of the roof<br />
was able to be observed due to the internal wall between the mess room and<br />
store partially extending into the roof space, limiting visibility.<br />
From what could be observed the roof is of timber rafter construction covered<br />
with a bitumen roofing felt. The rafters appear to be supported on the<br />
external walls. As far as can be assessed the roof structure appears sound<br />
with no evidence of spread or major sagging. Some staining of the timbers<br />
was observed, probably from previous leakage. Maximum moisture readings<br />
of 12% were taken which is just below the figure where rotting may occur. It<br />
should be stressed, however, that these readings were taken over a very<br />
limited area.<br />
A brickwork chimney protrudes from the roof. This is rendered similarly to the<br />
external walls. From a visual external inspection this appears sound with no<br />
major cracking or deformation.<br />
Based on the limited survey the building appears structurally sound.<br />
It should be stressed that a more extensive survey of the roof space will be<br />
required prior to the proposed removal of the internal walls., However, initial<br />
observations suggest that the wall between the main store and the external<br />
covered area is non-load-bearing.<br />
Whilst the chimney appearsd sound at present, consideration should be given<br />
to removing it to prevent possible future health and safety issues. If it is used<br />
to house a future boiler flue appropriate work would be undertaken at that<br />
time.
Electrical Engineer’s Report<br />
Currently the building does not have an electrical supply, it has switchgear<br />
and an incoming cable which it is assumed originally supplied the installation<br />
but there is no information/evidence as to the source. There is no separate<br />
service cut-out so it did not have its own separate supply.<br />
The building has one distribution board to supply the complete installation,<br />
which is located in the present kitchenette area.<br />
Wiring is a combination of surface clipped, contained in a surface conduit<br />
system, or contained within the ceiling void and it has been undertaken in an<br />
ad-hoc fashion which is untidy in many areas and the condition is just<br />
acceptable to poor.<br />
Current earthing and bonding is untidy but seems generally acceptable, but is<br />
not compliant to current regulations.<br />
Artificial lighting is provided via tired-looking fluoresecent luminaires without<br />
diffusers.<br />
Power is provided by a limited number of surface-mounted socket outlets.<br />
The building currently has no fire alarm or emergency lighting.<br />
A new electrical supply will need to be installed, either from an acceptable<br />
remote source by means of an underground cable or by means of a new<br />
separate supply from the Supply Authority.<br />
For any sort of refurbishment it is recommended that the existing installation is<br />
fully replaced, and the replacement would need to comprise:<br />
Mains distribution infrastructure<br />
Comprehensive earthing and bonding<br />
Lighting installation including external areas<br />
Power installation including any remote electricity supplies for bespoke park<br />
use<br />
Suitable fire alarm and emergency lighting<br />
Electrical supplies and control circuitry for heating, hot water, and ventilation<br />
equipment<br />
In addition intruder alarm, ICT equipment and CCTV may be needed<br />
dependent on Client requirements
Quantity Surveyor’s Report<br />
The works generally comprise the demolition of the internal walls to the store<br />
rooms of the existing building. New internal walls and partitions are to be<br />
constructed to form an Art Studio, classroom, office, two store rooms, boiler<br />
room, WC and Disabled WC.<br />
New external uPVC or timber doors and windows are to be fitted. Internal<br />
doors will be solid core to half-hour fire resisting standard; all ironmongery will<br />
be heavy duty stainless steel. All walls and the ceiling are to be redecorated<br />
and internal doors will receive a paint finish. All external walls and solid<br />
internal walls will be dry lined with a thermally backed gypsum board. The<br />
office is to be fitted with units and a sink. The internal floor levels will be<br />
made level throughout the building. The ceiling will be made to run through<br />
at one level and also be overboarded in plasterboard and this will receive a<br />
plaster skin coat.<br />
Floors will have non-slip vinyl covering to both WCs and the remainder will<br />
have a Marmoleum covering except the boiler room which is not to have a<br />
floor finish.<br />
Space heating is to be a wood-burning manually fed boiler supplying hot water<br />
to radiators of suitable size and output. All radiators will be fitted with<br />
thermostatically controlled valves.<br />
A complete rewire is envisaged with all necessary heating controls and<br />
mechanical ventilation supplied by the new rewire. An over sink water heater<br />
has been included within this scheme to supply hot water. No allowances<br />
have been made for any upgrading of existing service supplies as the current<br />
capacity is deemed to be adequate for the proposed work.<br />
External works comprise repairs to the roof, gutters, fascia, soffites and<br />
rainwater goods to match the existing. New DDA compliant ramps are to be<br />
formed to both front and rear entrances by reforming the tarmac footpath and<br />
erecting handrails. The existing tarmac footpath is to be renewed around the<br />
perimeter of the building.<br />
A new pumped connection manhole is to be constructed together with new<br />
drain runs connecting to the drain in the park area. A new back inlet gulley is<br />
to be installed to allow for drainage from the new kitchen and cleaners sink.<br />
Nominal allowances have been made in the costs for works associated with<br />
potential asbestos removal. This will be further refined once survey details<br />
have been completed and the full extent of the works defined.<br />
Building £103,000<br />
Preliminaries £16,000<br />
Contingency £5,000<br />
The estimate of costs shown above are subject to the works being carried out<br />
before March 31 st 2012.<br />
Beyond this date it is anticipated that the prevailing rate of construction<br />
inflation will need to be added to the above figures.<br />
This estimate has been prepared to the details and descriptions provided by<br />
SDPM Architects.<br />
Professional fees are not included.
Assessment Team<br />
The building was visited and surveyed by the following on August 2 nd 2010 to<br />
prepare the foregoing report:<br />
John Brown Senior Architect 2736045<br />
David Hardwick Architectural Assistant 2736070<br />
Richard Coe Structural Engineer 2736050<br />
Richard Payne Electrical Engineer 2736096<br />
The following were consulted but did not visit on this occasion<br />
Paul Bangert Architectural Assistant 2736067<br />
Steve Guest Principal Engineer 2736103<br />
Paul Sheen Quantity Surveyor 2736223<br />
PW/03329<br />
6/8/10/JB<br />
10/8/10/PI<br />
11/8/10/PS
371<br />
110<br />
369<br />
(<br />
367<br />
67 85<br />
(<br />
132.2m<br />
wimming Pool<br />
365<br />
&<br />
363<br />
361<br />
102<br />
(<br />
79<br />
El<br />
Sub Sta<br />
(<br />
349<br />
(<br />
130.8m<br />
&<br />
92<br />
BM 131.92m<br />
&<br />
&<br />
63<br />
Gymnasium<br />
(<br />
0<br />
82<br />
(<br />
HARCOURT ROAD<br />
55<br />
300<br />
&<br />
72<br />
129.4m<br />
(<br />
D Fn<br />
45<br />
&<br />
Shelter<br />
62<br />
Shelter<br />
27 35<br />
BM 127.80m<br />
Old Dam House<br />
(<br />
127.9m<br />
375<br />
The Cottage<br />
&<br />
(<br />
&<br />
FS<br />
&<br />
Sluice<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong><br />
Playground<br />
CROOKESMOOR<br />
Boating Lake<br />
(<br />
600<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
&<br />
Boating Lake<br />
&<br />
Bowling Green<br />
600<br />
Roman Coins found<br />
1823<br />
229<br />
(<br />
D Fn<br />
(<br />
r<br />
(<br />
(<br />
Bowling Green<br />
& ( &<br />
(<br />
229<br />
( (<br />
PCs<br />
124.4m<br />
(<br />
Shaft<br />
(disused)<br />
Obelisk<br />
MUSHROOM LANE<br />
122.4m<br />
Weston<br />
<strong>Park</strong>
Art in the <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Ponderosa</strong>, <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> & <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
Consultation 2009<br />
Summary of Consultation:<br />
As part of the 3 <strong>Park</strong>s Consultation Art in the <strong>Park</strong> (Sheffield) ran 3 creative<br />
events in the parks, handed out over 500 questionnaires, attended a family event<br />
at Netherthorpe Primary School and led the consultation at a stakeholders<br />
meeting. The Regeneration Officer also attended various local forums (including<br />
Walkley Forum, Upperthorpe TARA, the <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Bowling Club’s AGM) to<br />
give presentations on the masterplan and leave questionnaires with the groups.<br />
From the questionnaires we had 167 responses of which most people were from<br />
S11, S10, S6 and S3. We had 48 responses from children. 13 people used<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong>, 95 used <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and 59 used <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>-<br />
1 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
(poster of events)<br />
We set up a creative consultation event on the 24 th October 2-4pm but due to wet<br />
weather we had to cancel, instead the team walked around the park and spoke to<br />
people using the <strong>Park</strong>. It has been felt throughout the consultation that we have<br />
had a lot of input from people who use <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> park; the feedback we<br />
received was in depth and meaningful and the Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
played a large role in previous consultation and the stakeholders meeting.<br />
Questionnaire results:<br />
What do you use the park for?<br />
Dog walking 7<br />
Use of the playground 15<br />
Use of the sports areas 9<br />
To watch wildlife/birds 19<br />
Fishing 6<br />
To get to and from places 31<br />
To relax and sit down 33<br />
To exercise: walking or jogging 28<br />
Other- please state 9<br />
(Main uses in red)<br />
Those that reported “other” suggested they used the park to feed the ducks,<br />
biking riding, bowling, to have lunch, drawing, sketching, working, to maintain<br />
sanity!
Do you find the site welcoming?<br />
Yes (only two reported no). Reasons for this were:<br />
o The park is spacious, clean and well maintained<br />
o Most users are friendly<br />
o The park-keepers are friendly and around.<br />
o It feels cared for<br />
o Fellow dog-walkers chat<br />
o Over-looked from road so feels safe<br />
o It’s nice to see different people using it<br />
o There are lots of trees, green space, water, birds<br />
o It’s light<br />
o You can see your children wherever they are in the park<br />
o Easy access<br />
But….<br />
o Handrails needed up some steps.<br />
o There are access problems for some people e.g. no wheelchairs or<br />
buggies can access from Harcourt Rd and access from Dam House<br />
Lane/Mushroom lane is hazardous, etc.<br />
o Not keen on the Mushroom Lane/Dam House corner - it just feels a bit<br />
intimidating if walking alone.<br />
o Routes/ paths can be hidden, steep and feel unsafe<br />
o Derelict land by the lake can attract undesirables<br />
o Looks dated compared to Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
Thinking about the park you use most often please rate the following:<br />
Very Good Average Poor Very No<br />
good<br />
poor opinion<br />
Signage 5 13 23 4 3 12<br />
Access paths 2 24 20 3 8 2<br />
Sports facilities 3 12 17 5 10 12<br />
Play Facilities 6 28 12 3 1 7<br />
Wildlife 2 21 16 9 2 9<br />
Design and overall<br />
appearance<br />
4 22 17 2 0 3<br />
Cleanliness 12 25 18 2 1 1<br />
(Red represents the highest rating)<br />
Overall the park rates “Good”<br />
2 www.artinthepark.org.uk
Which of the above do you think is most in need of improvement?<br />
10 access paths, 7 appearance, 4 cleanliness, 5 play, 6 signage, 7 sports, 6<br />
wildlife- Local residents feel that Access Paths are most in need of improvement.<br />
Would you like more events in this park?<br />
14 no, 49 yes<br />
Examples of events that people would like to see include-<br />
o Fruit picking,<br />
o Boating/boat races,<br />
o Outdoor cinema,<br />
o Fishing classes for kids,<br />
o Bird watching,<br />
o Wildlife watching,<br />
o Star gazing,<br />
o Heritage walks,<br />
o Nature walks,<br />
o Art exhibition,<br />
o Pond dipping,<br />
o Information events about sustainability.<br />
o Sports,<br />
o Outdoor music events,<br />
o More Art in the <strong>Park</strong>,<br />
o Kids activities,<br />
o Family activities<br />
o Water sports<br />
o Day events,<br />
o Ranger events,<br />
o Farmers markets,<br />
o Simple events which show children the beauty and importance of nature,<br />
o Outdoor sculpture<br />
If you could change or add anything to this park what would it be?<br />
o Café/Ice-creams in building<br />
next to lake.<br />
o Better use of the lake, egg<br />
boating, watching wildlife.<br />
o Wilderness area on<br />
Mushroom Lane side could be<br />
improved.<br />
o An area that is flat to kick a<br />
ball around.<br />
o There are a lot of steps down<br />
to the playground.<br />
o See saw in the playground,<br />
o Duck house,<br />
3 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
o Improve parking,<br />
o Make the lake safer and a<br />
wider path around it/ make it<br />
harder for children to access.<br />
o Turn one bowling green into a<br />
football pitch,<br />
o The main bowling green is in<br />
need of protection from being<br />
used as common ground<br />
(could be hedges as at<br />
Longley <strong>Park</strong> which would<br />
enhance the <strong>Park</strong> not spoil it),<br />
signs asking not to play on
and keep off are badly placed<br />
and poorly composed<br />
o More benches,<br />
o Access paths for prams, as<br />
most parents enter from<br />
Harcourt rd, and there is no<br />
direct pathway leading to the<br />
playground.<br />
o More wild and colorful<br />
planting,<br />
o To make the hut into some<br />
kind of classroom for<br />
environmental studies, i.e.<br />
what animals are in the park,<br />
why the park was built<br />
o Don't allow dogs in the park,<br />
o Sport facilities for young<br />
people,<br />
o Brighten up playground,<br />
o Make lake more wildlife<br />
friendly.<br />
o Make the lake a feature for<br />
sports<br />
4 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
o Put more info on signs about<br />
the park and dam,<br />
o Reintroduce the rabbits,<br />
o Add recycling facilities, café,<br />
o Clean up the lake for use of<br />
wildlife - birds and fish. It<br />
smells, and looks so murky<br />
and full of rubbish at the<br />
corners.<br />
o Rowing boats/ I think boating<br />
would be too dangerous as it's<br />
40' deep in the middle. All<br />
children would need life<br />
jackets nowadays.<br />
o Activities for older children<br />
o Stop students from playing<br />
football and riding their bikes<br />
on the bowling green<br />
o Change one of the bowling<br />
greens into a sports area for<br />
older children and adults<br />
o More toilets<br />
Other Comments:<br />
o Wonderful to see the good solid benches in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and all<br />
the hard work done by statutory and voluntary workers.<br />
o There have been very welcome recent improvements egg planting at<br />
entrance of <strong>Crookes</strong> valley and Weston <strong>Park</strong>. Also day to day<br />
management is very good overall.<br />
o Would prefer the <strong>Park</strong> not to be tidied up as much as Weston <strong>Park</strong> -<br />
children enjoy playing in wilder areas<br />
o Concerned about potential abuse to bowling club members when asking<br />
people not to play football/ golf on the greens<br />
o It would be great to pull the <strong>Park</strong>s together especially after the success of<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong>. Each park could have their own identity and be linked.<br />
Do you use any of the parks on your route from one place to another, if so<br />
where are you going?<br />
Beanies, bus stop, city centre from Walkley, Harcourt road to university,<br />
Home to town to hospitals, to school or a friend’s house, to work,<br />
hospital/dentists, University, Weston <strong>Park</strong>.
Additional points were raised at the Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Walkabout 12/08/08, and the Masterplan stakeholder meeting 29/09/09<br />
Enhance wildlife value of lake by:<br />
• Establishing duck island/s<br />
• Creating beach area at edge of shallower zone in south corner<br />
Enhance recreational/ leisure opportunities by:<br />
• Restoring boating house (fishing? cafe? outdoor classroom) and toilets<br />
• Re-establishing parking facilities for park users in the car park in the west<br />
corner of the park<br />
• Redesigning and replanting the area where the old boat store used to sit<br />
• Completing the programme of bench renewal<br />
• Planning and undertaking maintenance programme for south east<br />
woodland including wood chip surfacing of footpath<br />
• Providing additional playground equipment<br />
• Installing irrigation for main bowling green<br />
• Developing boating and fishing opportunities<br />
Improve pathways and terraces by:<br />
• Upper terrace- providing additional seating and new flower/ shrub beds<br />
• Middle terrace- transforming into recreational areas or resurfacing,<br />
installing Queen Vic/ Britannia to replace guns<br />
• Lower terrace and most paths also need partial or comprehensive<br />
resurfacing (some resurfacing work is being planned but its scope is<br />
unclear)<br />
• Painting existing handrails<br />
• Providing handrails on steepest parts of path down from Dam House Lane<br />
to lake<br />
• Creating wheelchair accessible entrance and footpath from Harcourt Road<br />
to upper terrace<br />
• Creating new footpath without steps from Mushroom Lane entrance to<br />
bowling greens<br />
Issues / Suggested Improvements<br />
• Terraces need improvement – central one currently used for bowlers<br />
parking<br />
• Could look at boats, café & fishing as a whole package<br />
• Use of the University Car park for <strong>Park</strong> users<br />
• Link footpath from top of park – would mean 2 nd terrace could be better<br />
used and cars could use other driveway and be out of main body of park<br />
• Improve paths, narrow terrace pathways<br />
• Management plan needed for the woodland area (to link to <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
woods)<br />
5 www.artinthepark.org.uk
Consultation with Sheffield Canoe Club<br />
The Regeneration Officer contacted the Canoe Club via email in October 2009 to<br />
find out about their usage of the Lake and whether they had any ideas for future<br />
improvements. Points made in their response included:<br />
• The lake is pretty much the perfect resource as it’s so close to Goodwin<br />
and great for beginners to start learning on.<br />
• The only problems that we have experienced whilst at the lake is a bit of<br />
antisocial behaviour from certain individuals who have wanted to use our<br />
equipment on the lake.<br />
• We were wondering whether there was any possibility of utilising the<br />
rowing boat shed for storage of canoes, as our current boat shed isn’t in<br />
an ideal location and is small.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Overall, this park is seen as a welcoming, well maintained space.<br />
The consultation suggests that the main issues that local people would like to<br />
see resolved are:<br />
Lake: This is the focal feature of the <strong>Park</strong> and needs to be utilised to its full<br />
potential. Many consultees were keen to see more water based events/activities<br />
take place. The masterplan should consider enhancing the wildlife value of the<br />
Lake through planting marginal vegetation and installing a floating island. Fishing<br />
is a key activity in the <strong>Park</strong> and as such consideration should be given to the<br />
installation of fishing platforms.<br />
Boat House: The regeneration and future usage of the Boat House is a great<br />
opportunity, with community support for it becoming an outdoor classroom, café<br />
or concessions facility. Further exploration needs to be carried out regarding the<br />
viability of these options e.g. discussions with Woodthorpe Development Trust<br />
who have expressed an interest in using the boat house to run classes such as<br />
bird watching and fishing from.<br />
Play: The consultation suggests that local residents believe the playground could<br />
be brightened up and improved through adding extra pieces of play equipment.<br />
The masterplan could consider extending the boundary of the playground into the<br />
woodland that slopes above it to include elements of naturalistic play.<br />
Bowling Greens: Through the consultation, questions have been raised around<br />
whether there is still a need for the second bowling green, and whether there is a<br />
more appropriate use for it e.g. a sports area for young people. The consultation<br />
revealed that the <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Bowling Club is a well attended and well<br />
supported Club with a wide catchment area. The bowling greens are also in<br />
keeping with the identity of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> with sports use being more<br />
appropriate to the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>. The bowlers have requested that fencing or<br />
hedging be installed around the green. The masterplan needs to consider<br />
6 www.artinthepark.org.uk
whether this would be an appropriate solution to the current problems being<br />
experienced here.<br />
Access paths: In particular consider improving access to the playground. Local<br />
residents have highlighted various paths around the <strong>Park</strong> which would benefit<br />
from improved surfacing and installation of handrails.<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing: There are currently parking issues relating to the use of the Bowling<br />
Greens. The bowlers are currently using the middle Terrace as a short term<br />
solution. A more appropriate long term solution needs to be found. Visitors to the<br />
<strong>Park</strong> have also experienced problems parking nearby- a solution may lie in<br />
reaching agreement with the university regarding the use of the Car <strong>Park</strong><br />
adjacent to the Dam House.<br />
Public Facilities: Many park users have requested that public toilets be<br />
available in the <strong>Park</strong>. Further investigation should be made into whether the<br />
toilets adjacent to the Dam House could be made available to the public (as<br />
agreed in the lease).<br />
Planting: The consultation suggests that people would like to see more wild and<br />
colorful planting which could be achieved through replacing some of the tired<br />
shrub beds and planting up the area where the old boat store used to be located.<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
(photos of the park)<br />
On the 24 th Oct 11-1pm we set up our gazebo in the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> 20 students from<br />
the University of Sheffield met us to help with the day and also to do some litter<br />
picks. But due to the wet weather only 6 adults and 4 children attended, however<br />
all completed questionnaires and the children made monsters that lived in the<br />
park. Some of the comments that came from the monsters were:<br />
o More colorful swings and slides<br />
o I wish there was more shelter<br />
o Make sure no dogs are allowed in the children’s area<br />
o More benches needed for relaxing<br />
o More underground tunnels and proper marking for the of the park- not<br />
sure what this means<br />
o Big slide and swings needed<br />
We also attended a family day at Netherthorpe Primary school on the 21/10- here<br />
we made monsters with the children and filled in questionnaires, we spoke to<br />
over 40 children and adults and included the finding in the results below.<br />
7 www.artinthepark.org.uk
In addition to the results from completed questionnaires, a specific consultation<br />
exercise was carried out about the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> at the Peace In The <strong>Park</strong> Festival<br />
(June 2009). These have been grouped together with the questionnaire results in<br />
the summaries below:<br />
What do you use the park for?<br />
Dog walking 24<br />
Use of the playground 32<br />
Use of the sports areas 36<br />
To watch wildlife/birds 14<br />
Fishing 1<br />
To get to and from places 37<br />
To relax and sit down 20<br />
To exercise: walking or jogging 19<br />
Other- please state 6<br />
(Main uses in red)<br />
Those that reported “other” suggested they used the park for PE lessons,<br />
community events, games with grand children, BBQ’s, taking the baby for a walk.<br />
Do you find the site welcoming?<br />
23 no, 84 yes Reasons for this were:<br />
o It always looks good no matter what the weather - except the litter,<br />
o Nice mix of activities and people,<br />
o Grass is always well kept,<br />
o Planting of trees good idea,<br />
o Peaceful, enclosed,<br />
o Because there are lots of friendly people about,<br />
o Because the dogs can't get in the playground,<br />
o Because we stay as a group,<br />
o Lovely to have green surroundings, appreciated very much<br />
o It’s a lovely green park with lots of trees and a good play area for children<br />
o It’s clean<br />
o Friendly<br />
o Easy access<br />
But…<br />
o Access from Oxford St not obvious.<br />
o Entrance from <strong>Crookes</strong> is very off-putting, dark and often littered.<br />
o Litter and broken glass<br />
o Because not everyone around there is safe to be with<br />
o Because there is a church where you can run to, and my house nearby,<br />
o From the bottom and it feels a bit scruffy. I've seen rats down here<br />
8 www.artinthepark.org.uk
Thinking about the park you use most often please rate the following:<br />
Very Good Average Poor Very No<br />
good<br />
poor opinion<br />
Signage 9 39 31 10 14 4<br />
Access paths 22 39 29 7 2 3<br />
Sports facilities 13 22 22 19 12 5<br />
Play Facilities 22 32 28 8 3 2<br />
Wildlife 14 27 25 16 7 7<br />
Design and overall<br />
appearance<br />
16 38 27 8 6 2<br />
Cleanliness 14 37 21 14 11 3<br />
(Red represents the highest rating)<br />
Overall the park rates “Good/Average”<br />
Which of the above do you think is most in need of improvement?<br />
12 Access paths, 7 appearance, 11 cleanliness, 17 play equipment, 5 signage, 6<br />
wildlife, 13 sports facilities- Play equipment is in most need of improvement<br />
Would you like more events in this park?<br />
8 no, 87 yes<br />
Examples:<br />
o Music festivals,<br />
o It would be great if it ran over<br />
the whole weekend and<br />
possible a little later into the<br />
evening.<br />
o More similar events would be<br />
great.<br />
o Children’s events,<br />
o Football tournament,<br />
o Brass bands,<br />
o Car boots,<br />
o Play groups,<br />
o Wildlife,<br />
9 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
o Youth and sports groups,<br />
o Circus, tennis,<br />
o Picnics,<br />
o Dog show,<br />
o Craft fairs,<br />
o Family events,<br />
o Fundraising,<br />
o Fun day,<br />
o Community sports day for the<br />
younger people<br />
o It would be great if the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> carnival of<br />
previous years started up<br />
again, or if there was an
annual fun day like at Ruskin <strong>Park</strong><br />
As part of the consultation we contacted the Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> festival<br />
organisers. They said that the main improvements they would like to see were to<br />
the top field nearest <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road. These improvements would include<br />
better drainage and a vehicle access ramp from the car parking spaces down on<br />
to the field. These improvements would enable the field to be used for activities<br />
which requires some form of temporary vehicle access e.g. stallholders,<br />
marquees and staging.<br />
If you could change or add anything to this park what would it be?<br />
o Some locations for<br />
establishment of those 'all<br />
ages' keep fit things.<br />
o Bottom boundary with<br />
Upperthorpe rd could be more<br />
interesting - but without<br />
interrupting the view from the<br />
road.<br />
o Improved areas for children,<br />
young people and old people<br />
to play sports, exercise and<br />
play.<br />
o Thin South Back Woodland<br />
and add shrubs.<br />
o Improve access paths at top<br />
of <strong>Ponderosa</strong>, improve wildlife<br />
in woodlands. Prevent dog<br />
mess on open areas.<br />
o Link path around football pitch<br />
back to playground.<br />
o Spotlight path in the lower<br />
half.<br />
o Make more inviting to<br />
approach, it's a great facility<br />
that few people know about. I<br />
didn't even know it was there<br />
until attending Peace in the<br />
<strong>Park</strong>,<br />
o Add a building for youth work<br />
and sports clubs.<br />
o Rugby posts,<br />
o Tennis court and bird feeders,<br />
10 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
o A really big slide,<br />
o Trampoline and racing track,<br />
o More grass on the football<br />
pitch,<br />
o A path going up the hill to the<br />
flat area,<br />
o No motorbikes,<br />
o Dogs bins at entrances,<br />
o More local community<br />
involvement,<br />
o Add nets to goal posts,<br />
o Signage and access paths<br />
need improving,<br />
o Basketball court,<br />
o Swings,<br />
o BMX track to be gravel<br />
instead of grass,<br />
o Roundabout,<br />
o Add a buggy-friendly path that<br />
looped round the whole of the<br />
top half of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> - at<br />
the moment it stops halfway<br />
round by the climbing rock.<br />
o Get rid of the ants in the<br />
children’s playground.<br />
o Fix benches and replacing<br />
burnt-out items,<br />
o Bowling green on <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
o Older persons playground,<br />
including swings<br />
o From the top it's hard to see<br />
that it's a lively big space.
Could do with a view into the park<br />
o Upgrade the paths and the 100 steps through the woods<br />
o It’s huge! It needs more park playground stuff!<br />
o Should celebrate it more as it’s great<br />
o We need more events like Peace in the <strong>Park</strong><br />
o CCTV would be good<br />
o There should be more cycle ways through the park- to link in with other<br />
cycle ways in the neighbourhood<br />
o More wildlife habitats<br />
o Need signs to find it!<br />
o Some benches, more play equipment and a multi sensory sculpture trail<br />
o More seating<br />
o Lighting in park would be good<br />
o Tarmac whole length of the bike path from shops to flats so it is no longer<br />
muddy and slippery<br />
o Overgrown paths in the wood<br />
o Hard to find if you don’t know the area as <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> &<br />
Weston <strong>Park</strong> are all grouped together as <strong>Crookes</strong>moor <strong>Park</strong>s on Google<br />
Maps<br />
o Paths too slippy in woodland<br />
o Some violence, gangs hanging around<br />
Other Comments:<br />
o Very under-used resource for sports, rough play, enjoying wildlife,<br />
o Better resources needed to support the maintenance team,<br />
o More dog wardens,<br />
o The playground is only suited for little kids,<br />
o Need more security,<br />
o I keep seeing rats, but cleanliness is improving,<br />
o Entrance from the road at the top would be good<br />
o Glad care will at last be lavished on the <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
o Several comments were made about improving access to <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong> including “More zebra crossings would be helpful! Not very safe-<br />
some kind of traffic calming needed, More crossing points needed”<br />
o I like the openness of the <strong>Park</strong><br />
o I love the playground<br />
o Weston <strong>Park</strong> is too formal- I like the wildness of <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
o The climbing boulder is the best bit<br />
o Topography is good<br />
Do you use any of the parks on your route from one place to another, if so<br />
where are you going?<br />
Town, Kelham island, university, crookes to <strong>Philadelphia</strong>, school ,Tesco, Weston<br />
park, work, St Stephen’s, from office to Edward St Flats/Netherthorpe school,<br />
11 www.artinthepark.org.uk
Walkley to town, visiting family and friends, Hallamshire/ Weston <strong>Park</strong> hospital,<br />
From Upperthorpe to <strong>Crookes</strong><br />
Additional points were raised at the Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Walkabout 12/08/08, and the Masterplan stakeholder meeting 29/09/09<br />
• Plan and undertake woodland management to enhance this woodland’s<br />
value as one of Sheffield’s best inner city wildlife havens (whilst<br />
maintaining its woodland character). This will also have a positive impact<br />
on perceptions of safety.<br />
• Link up footpaths that currently dead end<br />
• Develop nature trail circuit<br />
• Add topsoil to football pitch and improve its drainage<br />
• All age gyms could be considered: in an open and visible area (any<br />
lessons learned from Endcliffe <strong>Park</strong>?)<br />
• Re-establish stream that used to flow on the surface in the south western<br />
part of the valley, restoring it to its original condition. (Important to<br />
consider maintenance implications of this).<br />
• Vehicle access control may be required<br />
• Possibility for SUDS scheme/ retention ponds to be investigated further<br />
• Explore different mowing regimes<br />
• Need to increase footfall to and through <strong>Ponderosa</strong>. This could be<br />
achieved through better links, signage and improved entrances<br />
• Scope for further development of orchard/ fruit trees<br />
From walkabout 8/12/08: -<br />
• Suggested removal of hawthorn hedge alongside path/woodland from<br />
entrance with Display boards and pillars<br />
• Long grass around the football pitch should be flailed once a year-<br />
potential for wildflower plug plants here? Ensure is on maintenance<br />
schedule.<br />
• Most important to open up sight lines from <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Rd into park-<br />
thin the woodland and open up views through.<br />
• More seating in park required- discussed that a seating area near<br />
Upperthorpe Road would be desirable for shoppers.<br />
• Improvements to footpath network to top end of park- upgrading and<br />
linking paths both on flat circuit and through the trees.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
Overall this park is also a well loved and enjoyable space. The consultation<br />
suggests that the main issues that local people would like to see resolved are:<br />
12 www.artinthepark.org.uk
Woodland: The consultation suggests that local residents find accessing the<br />
<strong>Park</strong> through the woodland intimidating due to the enclosed nature of this area.<br />
The masterplan should consider highlighting areas within the woodland that<br />
would benefit from selective thinning (also supported by the Phase 1 Ecology<br />
report), particularly along path edges and to open up views into the <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Access paths: Woodland footpaths have been identified as particularly slippy<br />
and treacherous. The masterplan should consider resurfacing certain paths,<br />
reconstructing the worst steps on the site and providing handrails in the steeper<br />
sections. Residents have also highlighted the need to link up existing footpaths to<br />
allow better circulation around the <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Signage: The consultation has flagged up a need for improved signage in the<br />
<strong>Park</strong>, which is currently almost non existent. Existing noticeboards have been<br />
added in an ad hoc fashion and are of different styles which does not help create<br />
an identity for the <strong>Park</strong>. The masterplan should consider the identity of the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> (Countryside? Rural? Urban <strong>Park</strong>?) and suggest how this could be<br />
achieved through new signage, entrance and edge treatment.<br />
Site Furniture: Residents have highlighted a lack of seats and benches in the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong>. These should be located at key positions on the main routes around<br />
the <strong>Park</strong> and the style of the benches should fit with the identity of the <strong>Park</strong>. The<br />
masterplan should also look at whether more dog bins are required in the <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Entrances & Edges: The consultation highlighted that many people from the<br />
wider area were not aware of the <strong>Ponderosa</strong>. This is partly due to a lack of<br />
visibility into the <strong>Park</strong> from <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Road (could be achieved through<br />
woodland management as highlighted above), but also due to low profile<br />
entrances. The masterplan should consider how to improve the main entrances<br />
into the park through new signage, noticeboards and edge treatments. Local<br />
residents have also highlighted the need to improve the bottom boundary of the<br />
<strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Planting & Biodiversity: The masterplan should consider bringing more colour<br />
into the <strong>Park</strong> through wildflower plug plants around the football pitch. Thought<br />
should also be given to ways in which the orchard could be further developed. As<br />
described in the Ecology Report the woodland would also benefit from thinning to<br />
give native species the opportunity to flourish.<br />
Sports & Play: The football pitch being in the location it is in (close to the<br />
universities and city centre) is in great demand but almost unplayable. The<br />
consultation demonstrated that there is a lot of support to upgrade this pitch. The<br />
masterplan should also consider how the lower playground could be improved<br />
and how better links could be made to the upper playground. Consultation has<br />
also shown support for all age gym equipment in this <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
13 www.artinthepark.org.uk
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens<br />
(photos of the park)<br />
On the 29 th October we were part of a celebration event in <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens,<br />
it was good weather and turn out, with everyone working together to launch the<br />
new basketball court. We worked closely with Zest and Sheffield Homes for this<br />
event and spoke to 17 children, 5 adults and 5 children. The monsters that were<br />
made suggested:<br />
o In the Kids' area: Fix the floor and the swings,<br />
o Skate area: Take out skateboard park and put in playground equipment,<br />
Take off spray paint, put in swings and stuff. Not many people do<br />
skateboarding!<br />
o Teen shelter: Put some swings here. I like it here because it's sheltered<br />
from the rain,<br />
o Wooded area: Cut down some of the bushes. Less rubbish, less trees and<br />
bushes in the way.<br />
Questionnaire results:<br />
What do you use the park for?<br />
Dog walking 4<br />
Use of the playground 4<br />
Use of the sports areas 3<br />
To watch wildlife/birds 4<br />
Fishing 0<br />
To get to and from places 6<br />
To relax and sit down 2<br />
To exercise: walking or jogging 6<br />
Other- please state 3<br />
(Main uses in red)<br />
Those that reported “other” suggested they used the park for drawing and<br />
sketching, to take the children out on the bikes, to put on events, to go to work,<br />
Do you find the site welcoming?<br />
6 no, 5 yes. Reasons for this were:<br />
o People just walking through are not caring for the area,<br />
14 www.artinthepark.org.uk
o Sometimes there are trolleys and glass about,<br />
o It just feels like a strip of land going from one place to another, and sadly it<br />
is often vandalised.<br />
o Because it is surrounded by woods and things.<br />
o I don't think it's very safe if kids are playing in it.<br />
But…<br />
o Very quiet when I walk.<br />
o Lots of things to look at, butterflies, birds, its getting better,<br />
o Wide, well maintained path.<br />
o Light and airy,<br />
o Wooded area,<br />
o It is better at the top end now that the graffiti has faded and the trees have<br />
been tidied up<br />
o Because there are no high climbing frames<br />
Thinking about the park you use most often please rate the following:<br />
Very Good Average Poor Very No<br />
good<br />
poor opinion<br />
Signage 0 2 3 3 3 2<br />
Access paths 2 4 3 1 1 0<br />
Sports facilities 1 2 2 1 5 2<br />
Play Facilities 0 2 3 4 2 2<br />
Wildlife 2 5 3 2 2 0<br />
Design and overall<br />
appearance<br />
0 4 4 3 1 0<br />
Cleanliness 0 2 7 2 2 0<br />
(Red represents the highest rating)<br />
There is no average rating for this park<br />
Which of the above do you think is most in need of improvement?<br />
1 access paths, 1 appearance, 4 cleanliness, 3 play, 1 signage, 1 wildlife<br />
Cleanliness of the park is in most need of improvement.<br />
Would you like more events in this park?<br />
1 no, 11 yes<br />
Examples:<br />
o Fruit picking,<br />
15 www.artinthepark.org.uk
o Music and dance,<br />
o Nature walks for children with a site map treasure hunt,<br />
o Conservation events - getting local people involved in looking after the<br />
place, especially the plants.<br />
o Art in the <strong>Park</strong>,<br />
o Children’s events,<br />
o Festivals<br />
If you could change or add anything to this park what would it be?<br />
o More bulbs,<br />
o Good to have some info on<br />
wildlife.<br />
o Improve track from Yeoman's<br />
rd- it gets very muddy and<br />
slippery in winter.<br />
o Better distribution of seats.<br />
o Play equipment and<br />
skateboard area need<br />
upgrading.<br />
o Haven't noticed any signage,<br />
16 www.artinthepark.org.uk<br />
o Add more fruit trees and<br />
plants to make it an enjoyable<br />
place to be,<br />
o Put in a death swing,<br />
o Stop drug users and drug<br />
dealers using this park.<br />
o Improve cleanliness,<br />
o Climbing frames,<br />
o Basketball court: have a little<br />
shop selling drinks and<br />
snacks, and renting out<br />
basketballs and footballs for a<br />
£1 deposit<br />
Other Comments:<br />
o I like the peacefulness, and wouldn't want to see it changed too much; it is<br />
a beautiful walk<br />
o Signs giving the area a name could give the area a sense of place, rather<br />
than just being a corridor.<br />
o The wildlife is surprisingly good, I have seen various tits and some finches<br />
in nesting season and I really think these should be encouraged, not<br />
trampled on if other improvements are made.<br />
o There are also a few fruit trees (apple and pear) and blackberry bushes in<br />
the park and I think more could be made of these, and more planted.<br />
o Provide dog bins and make dog owners pick up their dog mess.<br />
Do you use any of the parks on your route from one place to another, if so<br />
where are you going?<br />
Tesco, the shops, town, doctors, library, Langsett to Upperthorpe<br />
Additional points were raised at the Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Walkabout 12/08/08, and the Masterplan stakeholder meeting 29/09/09<br />
Suggestions for Improvements
• Open up sight lines and clear dense vegetation to enhance visibility,<br />
reduce feeling of enclosure and make it feel safer<br />
• Bring site into a regular maintenance programme of grass cutting and<br />
shrub pruning<br />
• Layout may need changing due to safety and access issues<br />
• Set up a Friends of <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens group<br />
• Develop play value of existing playground<br />
• Teen shelter currently attracts a lot of anti social behaviour- is this facility<br />
appropriate to the site<br />
• Skate <strong>Park</strong> is not used very much<br />
• Entrances to be clearly marked giving identity<br />
• Vehicle access control may be required<br />
• Site is used as a walk through to school…… opportunities with trail<br />
markings on the path to encourage people to walk through the <strong>Park</strong> en<br />
route to school<br />
• Problems with young people hanging out on toddler playground- may be<br />
due to isolated nature of youth shelter- is there potential to move this<br />
somewhere more visible?<br />
• Skate bowl doesn’t work for skaters due to rail on top of bowl- causes<br />
problems.<br />
• Signage needed and entrances formalising/upgrading<br />
Conclusion:<br />
This under used space is loved by those that use it. Local people particularly<br />
value the wildness of this space. However the consultation has highlighted that<br />
the masterplan needs to address the following issues:<br />
Cleanliness: One of the issues that local residents felt most strongly about was<br />
the amount of litter on the site. The masterplan should look at whether there are<br />
enough litter bins on site, and Sheffield Homes should review whether the bins<br />
are emptied on a regular enough programme.<br />
Signage: The consultation has shown that local people would like to see more<br />
signage in the <strong>Park</strong> which would help to create a feeling of place and also help<br />
people orientate themselves in what is quite a difficult site due to changing levels.<br />
By assigning signage to the main entrances, there would be the feeling of<br />
entering a <strong>Park</strong> as opposed to merely passing through a green corridor.<br />
Play: The skate park is not used, largely due to poor design but also due to<br />
people not feeling safe in this area with limited surveillance. The masterplan<br />
should explore an alternative use for this space; possibly targeted at older<br />
children as the toddler playground on the edge of the site caters for younger<br />
children. The masterplan should also consider whether the youth shelter should<br />
either be relocated or removed from site entirely as currently it is a target for anti<br />
social behaviour. The consultation highlighted that the existing toddler<br />
playground could be improved through adding further pieces of equipment.<br />
17 www.artinthepark.org.uk
FINAL POINTS…….<br />
One of the key aims of the masterplan is to create a better green web network<br />
between all of these three <strong>Park</strong>s. This could be achieved through:<br />
• Improved signage throughout all three <strong>Park</strong>s, possibly linking in with the<br />
style of Weston <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Improving Pathways to DDA standard where possible<br />
• Creating a pedestrian link between <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
• Creating green routes and corridor connections to link up with <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Gardens. This could be achieved through tree lining certain roads<br />
(possibly through the Community Forestry programme) or identifying<br />
incidental green spaces in the area and piecing together a patchwork of<br />
gardens and squares<br />
Incidental green spaces that have been highlighted through the consultation<br />
and should be looked at through during the masterplan design are:<br />
o Albion St/Oxford St corner<br />
o Garden of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Community Centre,<br />
o Roebuck rd/<strong>Crookes</strong>moor rd,<br />
o Ashberry rd/Upperthorpe,<br />
o Daniel Hill Peace Garden,<br />
o Blake St and walks through Bakendale Conservation Area.<br />
o Anywhere that links to the river Don,<br />
o Small space next to the old <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Middle School needs<br />
tidying up etc, Site at junction Harcourt rd and Northumberland<br />
rd, Ex glass research home,<br />
o The River Don corridor, and all its tributaries,<br />
o Bole Hills, Ruskin <strong>Park</strong>, Rivelin <strong>Valley</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong>,<br />
o Walkley Green opposite Netto<br />
o Garden of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Community Centre,<br />
o Some of very small Sheffield Homes spaces in Lower Walkley,<br />
o That little part next to Oxford St. Active Habitat Management<br />
o Langsett Green space is a wonderful large area that is<br />
completely under resourced,<br />
o Space at back of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor primary school,<br />
o Lower Walkley Green<br />
o Top side of Kelvin<br />
Finally, one recurring point has been prominent throughout this process. Whilst it<br />
is vitally important to link the parks better together, it is essential to understand<br />
the nature and purpose of each individual <strong>Park</strong> in order to create a different role<br />
and identity for each one.<br />
18 www.artinthepark.org.uk
REPORT: Mini Green Spaces Celebrations, June 2010
The Project<br />
The Mini Green Spaces Celebrations Project was commissioned by The Central<br />
Community Assembly to encourage more people to engage with small green<br />
spaces in their area, to find out more about how people use these spaces at<br />
present and to investigate what changes they might want to see in them in future.<br />
Three green spaces were identified in Walkley and Upperthorpe as particularly<br />
important.<br />
Art in the <strong>Park</strong> held one event in each of the green spaces as part of this project:<br />
1) 2 nd June, 12-2pm Lower Walkley Green Space<br />
2) 3 rd June 12-2pm, Oxford St/Albion St<br />
3) 4 th June, 12-2pm, Sydney Rd/Burns Rd<br />
All the events took place during half term, to encourage families to attend.<br />
Research Methodology<br />
The project had three elements:
1) Carrying out questionnaires about the spaces with the public (at events<br />
and door to door)<br />
2) An artist-led activity making mobiles about the spaces, using photographs,<br />
text and found objects<br />
3) Gathering comments about the spaces at events<br />
The questionnaires allowed us to gather a combination of qualitative and<br />
quantitative data about the spaces whilst the creative activity and comments<br />
allowed people to be more playful and imaginative in their responses to the<br />
space and encouraged new, celebratory engagements with the spaces.<br />
We took litter-picking equipment to the events and encouraged volunteers and<br />
participants to have a go. This provided a springboard for people to get more<br />
involved in the spaces and develop a sense of ownership.
Findings<br />
“We were looking at how we can use what we find around us, what we like about<br />
these green spaces including drawings of what we would want to find in these<br />
green spaces. They were successful workshops where people enjoyed what they<br />
made.” (Anneke Kuipers, Artist Facilitator)<br />
SYDNEY ROAD/WELLFIELD ROAD<br />
“It’s lovely to be able to look at all the green around here, but it’s not actually<br />
used that much”<br />
“It might be nice to have some community events out here”<br />
“I’d like to see some flowers planted”<br />
(Participants at the event)<br />
Most people questioned about this <strong>greenspace</strong> either don’t use it or just enjoy<br />
seeing the space. This may be because most of the residents of the flats at the<br />
top of Wellfield Road are elderly and have limited mobility. I suggest there may<br />
be a division between the views of these residents and the residents of the big<br />
houses on Sydney Road who seem to be mainly students or families and thus<br />
have different motivations. The vast majority of respondents thought the space<br />
was very nice or OK.<br />
There were a wide spread of views about the best thing in the space, but popular<br />
answers included that it is well-kept, green and nice to look at. These answers<br />
seem to reflect the less mobile, elderly population. Many respondents failed to<br />
identify any negative aspects of the space, but there were some concerns about<br />
dog mess and litter. Many people talked about the lack of seating and that there<br />
had been a bench which had been vandalized and removed. Some of the elderly<br />
people were really keen for this to be replaced, but quite cynical about how long<br />
it might last. Some respondents asked for kids’ equipment but we were<br />
concerned about how much this would be of real use as there didn’t seem to be<br />
many children living in the immediate area.
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Use for?<br />
Short cut Exercise Seeing<br />
greenery<br />
Reason for Use<br />
Don't use Other<br />
What do you think of the <strong>greenspace</strong>?<br />
Very nice It's ok Don't like it No response<br />
Opinion
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Preservation<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Too small<br />
Location/Shortcut<br />
Not well‐lit<br />
Well‐kept<br />
Messy/Overgrown/Dog mess<br />
Best thing?<br />
Green<br />
Peaceful<br />
Nice to look at<br />
Opinion<br />
Worst thing?<br />
Nothing to do<br />
Opinion<br />
Sloped<br />
Wildlife<br />
Other<br />
Other<br />
Nothing<br />
Nothing
Number of Users<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Seating<br />
What would you like to see it used for?<br />
Clean up<br />
Sport/Football<br />
Kids Facilities<br />
Current use<br />
Opinion<br />
Scenery<br />
Art work<br />
LOWER WALKLEY GREEN SPACE<br />
Other<br />
Not Sure<br />
“It’s really nice to see children playing here, but the top part needs to be mowed<br />
and the car park needs to be reclaimed into the space as it didn’t have proper<br />
permissions.” (Participant at the event)<br />
Most respondents use this <strong>greenspace</strong> for dog walking and they all feel that it is<br />
very nice or OK. From talking to local residents, it is clear that this space is highly<br />
valued. A recent planning infringement into the space led to resident uproar and<br />
a TARA has since been formed, which has gained preservation orders for some<br />
trees in the space and applied for village green status for the space. Local people<br />
have also been working on maintaining the space, using their own mower to trim<br />
the grass.<br />
Most people seemed to feel that the best thing about the space was simply that it<br />
was communal green space, but many would like more resources in the space,<br />
especially kids’ equipment. At the moment there are some rope swings which<br />
could possibly be replaced by slightly safer play equipment. The space also lacks<br />
any seating.
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Walking<br />
dog<br />
Use for?<br />
Short cut Exercise Seeing<br />
greenery<br />
Reason for Use<br />
What do you think of the<br />
<strong>greenspace</strong>?<br />
Don't use Other<br />
Very nice It's ok Don't like it No response<br />
Opinion
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Best thing?<br />
Location/Shortcut Wildlife Other<br />
Messy/Overgrown/Dog<br />
mess<br />
Opinion<br />
Worst thing?<br />
Nothing to do Nothing<br />
Opinion
Number of Users<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
What would you like to see it used<br />
for?<br />
Kids Facilities Art work Other<br />
Opinion<br />
OXFORD STREET/ALBION STREET<br />
“I love the amphitheatre effect in this space. It should be used for theatre shows!”<br />
“It can feel unsafe here as it’s quite overgrown”<br />
“Someone needs to stop the fly-tipping that happens here”<br />
(Participants at the event)<br />
Most respondents either didn’t use this space or used it as a shortcut. Many of<br />
the people using it as a shortcut were students walking to University or the City<br />
Centre. Many of the other respondents were council staff based in the Lifelong<br />
Learning and Skills Unit on <strong>Crookes</strong>moor Road (directly behind the space). Many<br />
of them don’t use the space. Most people felt the space was OK.<br />
Many respondents liked the greenness of the space and the wildlife in it.<br />
However, many others couldn’t identify anything positive about the space at all.<br />
The messiness and overgrown nature of the space, coupled with problems of
littering and fly-tipping were the main problems identified. The clean up in this<br />
space had the most profound effect. Sheffield Homes staff were also cutting back<br />
the overgrown vegetation around the time of our event which should have made<br />
a difference to the feel of the space, making it less enclosed and intimidating.<br />
There was a suggestion that one of the plants in the space is Japanese<br />
Knotweed, so Sheffield Homes were unable to cut this back. In future, people<br />
would like to see more clean up work in the space. Some people mentioned<br />
wanting kids equipment in the space, but I doubt this would be used that much as<br />
the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> playground is so close.<br />
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Use for?<br />
Short cut Exercise Seeing greenery Don't use<br />
Reason for Use<br />
What do you think of the<br />
<strong>greenspace</strong>?<br />
Very nice It's ok Don't like it No response<br />
Opinion
Number of Users<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Preservation<br />
Location/Shortcut<br />
Well‐kept<br />
Best thing?<br />
Green<br />
Peaceful<br />
Opinion<br />
Wildlife<br />
Secret<br />
Other<br />
Nothing
Number of Users<br />
Number of Users<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Too small<br />
Seating<br />
Messy/Overgrown/Dog mess<br />
Litter/Dumping Ground<br />
Worst thing?<br />
Opinion<br />
Hidden<br />
What would you like to see it used for?<br />
Clean up<br />
Kids Facilities<br />
Wildlife<br />
Current use<br />
Art work<br />
Opinion<br />
Community garden<br />
Other<br />
Place to eat<br />
Other<br />
Nothing<br />
Not Sure
Conclusion<br />
The workshop activities encouraged people to come out and use the spaces<br />
more, look at what is around them and imagine what could be. The findings were<br />
quite different from one space to the next, which reflects the diversity of users<br />
(from students to council staff to families to elderly people). As such, it is<br />
impossible to draw one overall conclusion, beyond the space-specific results<br />
outlined above. Instead, we have created a selection of potential future activities<br />
which could come out of this research.<br />
Future projects could include:<br />
- Employer supported volunteering encouraging council workers from the<br />
Lifelong Learning and Skills Service to make more improvements to the<br />
Oxford Road/Albion St space.<br />
- More consultation with the Lower Walkley TARA to support them in<br />
improving the space, potentially installing some kids’ play equipment if<br />
appropriate.<br />
- Installing a bench near the flats at Sydney Road/Wellfield St space for<br />
elderly residents to use.<br />
- Communication with Sheffield Homes and local TARAs about the findings<br />
of this project and discussion regarding any further action.
Table giving details of consultation carried out to inform the <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> &<br />
<strong>Philadelphia</strong> Gardens Masterplan<br />
Stakeholder/Interest Group Consulted Aim Date<br />
Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> User Surveys & Graffiti User surveys carried out at Festival to find out why people June 2009<br />
Wall<br />
perceptions of <strong>Ponderosa</strong> and ideas for improvement<br />
Friends of <strong>Crookes</strong>moor <strong>Park</strong>s Meetings Discussion of masterplan progress with feedback given about Various<br />
issues in the <strong>Park</strong>s and ideas for improvement<br />
throughout<br />
masterplanning<br />
process<br />
Public Masterplan Meetings Meetings held at ZEST to update and review on masterplan Four public<br />
process, with opportunities to discuss, inform and agree<br />
meetings from<br />
masterplan proposals and recommendations<br />
September 2009-<br />
June 2010<br />
Your Say Community Assembly event Discussion about <strong>Park</strong> issues with local residents June 2009<br />
Art in the <strong>Park</strong> Consultation Events To find out what local people liked and didn’t like about their local September &<br />
including monster making activities in the parks- using innovative art activities as a medium for<br />
October 2009<br />
three <strong>Park</strong>s & Netherthorpe Primary<br />
School Workshop<br />
communication<br />
Walkley Forum AGM Presentation about the masterplan with opportunity to discuss 2<br />
priorities and issues in the <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
nd November<br />
2009<br />
Upperthorpe TARA AGM Presentation about the masterplan with opportunity to discuss 11<br />
priorities and issues in the <strong>Park</strong>s<br />
th November<br />
2009<br />
Helen Banks, Weston <strong>Park</strong> Museums & To find out how Weston <strong>Park</strong> could more closely link with<br />
November 2009<br />
Galleries<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> & <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and discuss how future<br />
development of these 2 parks could add to and enhance Weston<br />
<strong>Park</strong> (and vice versa)
Targetted consultation with identified<br />
interest groups via individual meetings,<br />
telephone conversations & email:<br />
Sheffield University Canoe Club, No<br />
Limits Film Festival, Sheffield Homes,<br />
Councillors, <strong>Ponderosa</strong> Environment<br />
Group, Sheffield Bird Study Group,<br />
SPRITE<br />
Local TARAs:<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> and Upper Walkley Tara,<br />
Martin& Oxford Street Tower Blocks<br />
Tenants Association, Springvale & Amos<br />
Tara , St Stephens Tara, Langsett and<br />
Walkley Community Association<br />
Ryszard Szumski, Woodthorpe<br />
Development Trust<br />
Peter Gribbon.<br />
‘Education through Angling’, Abbeydale<br />
Industrial Hamlets<br />
To find out how the <strong>Park</strong>s should be improved with regard to<br />
individuals/groups particular areas of interest<br />
2009 & 2010<br />
To find out local TARA perceptions of their local <strong>Park</strong>s Various dates<br />
To find out about the work that WDT is carrying out through their<br />
‘Get Hooked On Life/Fishing’ and investigate whether there is any<br />
potential to further develop the project in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
To find out about the ‘Education through Angling’ work that PG is<br />
carrying out at AIH and investigate whether there is any potential<br />
to further develop the project in <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Gareth Roberts, Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> To find out what <strong>Park</strong> improvements would help develop the<br />
<strong>Ponderosa</strong> as a useful events space<br />
Matt Dean & Katherine Mudge, ZEST To find out about activities and events that ZEST run in the area<br />
and discuss how they could make the most of the <strong>Park</strong>s on their<br />
doorstep<br />
8 th June 2010<br />
14 th June 2010<br />
7 th July 2010<br />
7 th July 2010
Meeting With Gareth Roberts, Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> Organiser.<br />
7 th July 2010<br />
Discussion about <strong>Park</strong> improvements that would help develop the <strong>Ponderosa</strong><br />
as a useful events space:<br />
Vehicle Access<br />
• See map to show how 1 way system should be developed<br />
• Junction near the playground needs widening for vehicles<br />
• Drop kerbs at vehicle access points<br />
• Vehicle access to upper playing field needs improving (narrow track<br />
needs widening)<br />
• In an ideal word grass grids in the middle section of <strong>Ponderosa</strong> where<br />
main foot traffic occurs (although need to consider conflicts regarding<br />
use of this space by other <strong>Park</strong> users)<br />
• Important that drop bollards are flush with surface (recent issues when<br />
this wasn’t the case)<br />
Utilities<br />
GR felt that providing utilities would make the biggest difference in terms of<br />
developing the <strong>Ponderosa</strong> as an events space (especially sewerage).<br />
Pop ups(wind up boxes that can be wound down into the ground to minimise<br />
vandalism/ trip hazards etc) or robust static cabinets could be installed to<br />
house:<br />
Power: Events generally require 240V/ 64A. Would need one source of power<br />
per area (i.e. 4) and ideally underground ducting for distribution.<br />
Water: PitP currently plumb into a water source in the Tower Blocks but does<br />
not meet H&S standards. Ideally a connection and meter would be run off the<br />
mains water supply, and an agreement on service charges put into place.<br />
Telecoms: This would be the icing on the cake- being able to offer EPOS<br />
(Electronic Point Of Sale) would be particularly attractive to trades-people.<br />
PitP currently use radios but because of the changing levels they’re not that<br />
effective.<br />
Sewerage: Portaloos are currently the largest cost for event organisers, with<br />
significant environmental costs. Peace in the <strong>Park</strong> have expressed an interest<br />
in being able to bring flush toilets into the <strong>Park</strong> in the future which will involve<br />
linking into the existing sewerage system.<br />
The following info has been provided by the SCC Drainage Section “The<br />
public sewers are the responsibility of Yorkshire Water and they would not<br />
normally allow covers on public sewers to be removed/altered to make<br />
discharges. However, it would be possible to construct a private chamber and<br />
pipe work (belonging to the park) which connects to the public sewer. The<br />
actual connection to the public sewer would be by agreement with Yorkshire<br />
Water. Similarly a water supply could be taken off the Yorkshire Water main to<br />
a water meter, and a private water supply pipe onto the site. The cost private<br />
pipes/chambers, and the YW connection fees charged before the connection<br />
is made, would the responsibility of the park owners. The water consumption<br />
and the sewage disposal would be charged based on the meter reading
of water supply. So a temporary toilet block could be positioned on site and<br />
connected to the private water supply pipe and private foul chamber/drain.”<br />
Drainage: Issues in the lower part of the site. Needs to be considered and<br />
potentially included if improvement works are carried out here in the future.
Meeting with Peter Gribbon, Abbeydale Industrial Hamlets<br />
14.06.10. <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Aim of Meeting: To find out about the work that Peter is carrying out at AIH<br />
and investigate whether there is any potential to further develop the project in<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
‘Education Through Angling’ Project<br />
• Has a contract with the Education Authority for the next 3 years<br />
engaging hard to reach kids from 27 different schools in ‘Education<br />
through Angling’. There are currently 24 placements, with student<br />
placement attending the project for up to 3 days per week.<br />
• The work that Peter does with the kids is linked to numeracy and<br />
literacy through getting involved in measuring fish growth, measuring<br />
pollution, developing the fishery itself.<br />
• Target 14-16 year olds through the programme. Would like to expand<br />
the programme to cater for 16-19 year olds.<br />
• Run fishing taster events<br />
• Environment Agency work with ‘Education through Angling’ and<br />
provide advice and support.<br />
• Some of the young people who have been through the programme<br />
have now returned as volunteers to help out with running the project.<br />
Potential of <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Available facilities would need to be checked by the Education<br />
Authority to ensure meet Health & Safety standards.<br />
• Very supportive of the fishing platforms<br />
• ‘Education through Angling’ would ideally include two classrooms and<br />
toilet facilities. Although kitchen facilities are not essential to the project<br />
as packed lunches could be brought in for the students, a canteen to<br />
serve refreshments to pupils and visitors to the park would be ideal.<br />
• If the project was viable at <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, Peter said that it could<br />
be possible that they ran a kiosk in the <strong>Park</strong>. This could be part of the<br />
developmental learning programme for students.<br />
• Due to the success at AIH, Peter is keen to see this project develop on<br />
different sites across Sheffield and keen to increase the number of<br />
placements.<br />
• Peter thinks that <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is in an ideal location for this<br />
project.<br />
• Depth of water a problem beyond 8ft as the lack of light and the<br />
thermocline to the deeper parts of the water limits the potential. Trout<br />
are one of the few species of fish that are able to survive in deeper<br />
water. The commercial trout fisheries usually benefit from deep clean<br />
cool unproductive waters because trout are sensitive to high<br />
temperatures.<br />
• The project for <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> would be more attractive to users as a<br />
sustainable coarse fishery and beneficial to wildlife if habitat<br />
improvements were to be undertaken.
• The present depth of the water and lack of suitable aquatic and semi<br />
aquatic vegetation limits the potential biodiversity of the site.<br />
• Ideally the depth of the lake would be much shallower (8ft max, with<br />
shallow grading from the edges) if it is to be developed as a successful<br />
fishery able to support projects such as this.<br />
• More vegetation around the edges of the Lake would be beneficial to<br />
fish populations<br />
• Boating and fishing do not have to be mutually exclusive- they could<br />
co-exist if managed well with zoning
Meeting With Ryszard Szumski, Woodthorpe Development Trust<br />
08.06.10. <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Aim of Meeting: To find out about the work that WDT is carrying out and<br />
investigate whether there is any potential to further develop the project in<br />
<strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Woodthorpe Development Trust<br />
• Run a fishing club in various areas around Sheffield including<br />
Stradbrooke, Woodthorpe, Handsworth, Lower Manor & Richmond.<br />
• Currently run a fishing programme for young offenders at Aston, where<br />
there is a private lake with good facilities<br />
• WDT own 4 fishing permits that young people on the course can use<br />
• Staff are ‘Angling Development Board’ coaches<br />
• WDT have used <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Lake in the past with the original aim<br />
being that the Dam House facilities could be used for toilets/ food etc. It<br />
didn’t work out as the food was too expensive.<br />
Using <strong>Crookes</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
• The Pavilion would ideally house toilets, a small kitchen, and a<br />
classroom.<br />
• Boating could co-exist with running a fishing project in the Lake through<br />
zoning<br />
• Very supportive of the fishing platforms. Recommended including<br />
umbrella fixings. Ideally 8/10 along the suggested side, 2 of which<br />
would ideally be disabled accessible.<br />
• Would be good to extend the jetty for fishermen<br />
• Very supportive of the idea of floating islands being anchored off the<br />
permanent island as this would provide enhance habitat for fish.<br />
• There is potentially an interim measure that could be found, bringing<br />
young people in for single days if toilet facilities and meeting space<br />
could be agreed with the Dam House.<br />
Action: AR to investigate this possibility with the Dam House. Are<br />
they able to give this project access to toilets, meeting space and<br />
reasonably priced sandwiches?<br />
• WDT would like to run a taster session over the summer (possibly<br />
funded by the Environment Agency). Is it possible to tie this in with<br />
another event scheduled to take place over the summer in the<br />
<strong>Park</strong>?