24.08.2013 Views

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E C OE N E R G I A<br />

CorporaciónToisán<br />

Sept 2011


Contents:<br />

1. <strong>Intag</strong>’s socio-environmental context<br />

2. Susta<strong>in</strong>able economic alternatives for the<br />

management and development <strong>of</strong> the river <strong>Intag</strong>’s<br />

bas<strong>in</strong><br />

3. The <strong>project</strong> Hidro<strong>in</strong>tag<br />

4. Proposal for implementation 2011 - 2015


Orig<strong>in</strong>al vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ecuador</strong> Remnant vegetation <strong>in</strong><br />

1996<br />

<strong>Intag</strong><br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Environmental importance:<br />

600 Km2 <strong>of</strong> primary forest.<br />

420 Km2 under protection<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


<strong>Hydro</strong>logical importance:<br />

25 water bas<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Biological importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong>. Ecoregion “Choco<strong>–</strong>Tropical Andes”<br />

• “Hot Spot”: one <strong>of</strong> the places with the<br />

highest biodiversity and endemism on<br />

earth<br />

• Refuge <strong>of</strong> many animals <strong>in</strong> danger <strong>of</strong><br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction (Andean bear, spider monkey,<br />

jaguar)<br />

• Highly endangered<br />

INTAG


Socio-economic importance<br />

• 17.000 Inhabitants<br />

• Agricultural economy:<br />

• Gra<strong>in</strong>s: corn and beans<br />

• Livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Sugar Cane<br />

à Food sovereignty<br />

Unsatisfied needs<br />

- Communications - Roads<br />

- Education <strong>–</strong> Health care


Threats<br />

- degradation <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />

- erosion, loss <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

- loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity<br />

- ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>of</strong> species<br />

- low agricultural productivity<br />

- migration and poverty<br />

- expansion <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

border<br />

- conventional agriculture<br />

- Slash and burn practices /<br />

high usage <strong>of</strong><br />

agrochemicals<br />

- <strong>in</strong>vasions on forest heritage<br />

and protected forests<br />

- deforestation


large-scale m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

1980-1985: first explorations by<br />

the Belgium cooperation CTB<br />

1990-1997: exploration by the<br />

Japanese cooperation JICA<br />

1996: Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment (EIA)<br />

1.997 expulsion <strong>of</strong> Mitsubishi<br />

2003: illegal concession for<br />

Ascendant Copper Canada<br />

2008: M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mandate - National<br />

Assembly<br />

Retreat <strong>of</strong> Ascendant Copper


The m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>project</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to the EIA <strong>of</strong> JICA<br />

• 318 million tons <strong>of</strong> low-grade ore<br />

• 0.7% copper (2.2 million tons <strong>of</strong> pure copper)<br />

• per each metric ton <strong>of</strong> extracted material, 7 Kg copper will be obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

• residues: 315 million tons <strong>of</strong> material


Achievements <strong>of</strong> the social resistance process<br />

• Pacific resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

human rights violations<br />

• Regional environmental<br />

conscience<br />

• Retreat <strong>of</strong> 2 mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

• withdrawal <strong>of</strong> 23 illegal<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concessions<br />

• Legal actions aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

TSX<br />

• National debate about<br />

extractive <strong>in</strong>dustries


From resistance to suggestions <strong>–</strong> social organizational process<br />

CorporaciónToisán • Asociación de Caficultores Río <strong>Intag</strong> -<br />

AACRI<br />

• Defensa y Conservación Ecológica de<br />

<strong>Intag</strong> - DECOIN<br />

• Cord<strong>in</strong>adora de Mujeres de <strong>Intag</strong> - CMI<br />

• Corporación de Talleres del Gran Valle de<br />

Manduriacos - CTGV<br />

• Red Ecoturística de <strong>Intag</strong> - REI<br />

• Corporación de productores de granos<br />

<strong>Intag</strong> Sustentable - CORPAIS<br />

• Corporación de productores de lácteos <strong>Intag</strong> Leche - CORPIL<br />

• Asociación de Campes<strong>in</strong>os Agroecológicos de <strong>Intag</strong> - ACAI<br />

• Cooperativa de crédito asociativo - CORDESPRO - INTAG<br />

• Red de Bosques Comunitarios de <strong>Intag</strong><br />

• Casa Palabra y Pueblo


Answers and proposals <strong>of</strong> the organized civil society<br />

• Agro forestry organic<br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

• Dairy production <strong>in</strong> silvo<br />

pastures<br />

• Production <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

local gra<strong>in</strong><br />

• Agro <strong>in</strong>dustries &<br />

handicrafts<br />

150 ton/year<br />

4.000 lit/day<br />

200 ton /year<br />

180.000 $/year<br />

• Ecotourism 4.000 pas/year<br />

• Local micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance<br />

• Watershed conservation<br />

150.000 $/year<br />

45 reserves<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Projects<br />

10 year goals<br />

Amount Employment Incomes $/year<br />

Organic c<strong>of</strong>fee 3.375 ton/year 3.000 11.250.000<br />

Dairy production 45.000 lit/day 1.000 4.106.250<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

local gra<strong>in</strong><br />

Agro <strong>in</strong>dustries and<br />

handicrafts<br />

1.350 ton/year 3.500 1.050.000<br />

450.000 $/year 200 450.000<br />

Ecotourism 30.000 pass/year 250 1.350.000<br />

Local micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance 5.000.000 $/year 25 600.000<br />

Watershed conservation 78 reserves 234 --<br />

Forest corridors 1.000 Km2 145 ---<br />

8.354 18.806.250


Hidro<strong>Intag</strong> Project<br />

Communitarian management and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong>´s watershed<br />

through micro hydroelectric generation,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to environmental and social<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> the local communities and<br />

their organizations


Conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> forests<br />

Watershedmanagement<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

Generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>vestment:<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />

economic<br />

development,<br />

conservation<br />

Sell<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the<br />

national<br />

system<br />

Fiduciary<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Investors<br />

Enterprise Management Model<br />

Public Sector:<br />

Local governments:<br />

• Juntas Parroquiales <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong> (7)<br />

• Prov<strong>in</strong>cial gvnt <strong>of</strong> Imbabura<br />

Mixed Economy<br />

Company<br />

Consortium<br />

public - communitarian<br />

Communitarian Sector :<br />

Corporación Toisán:<br />

- 9 organizations from 46<br />

communities and 1700 families<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Steps taken until the actualitty<br />

• 2006: identification and design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>project</strong>, <strong>in</strong>stitutional approvals<br />

• 2007: 1 st technical mission from cuba solar à<br />

watershed diagnosis <strong>–</strong> 30 potential location<br />

• 2008 <strong>–</strong> 2012: national and French technical<br />

team à 3 prefeasibility studies, local people<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, watershed monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 2011 Redef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g management model


Cuba Solar -<br />

Cuba<br />

• Renewable<br />

Energy<br />

• Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Technical<br />

evaluation<br />

The technical team <strong>of</strong> Hidro<strong>Intag</strong>:<br />

National team <strong>of</strong><br />

Hidro<strong>Intag</strong><br />

• Technical studies<br />

• Environmental studies<br />

• eng<strong>in</strong>eer Ricardo<br />

Buitrón (ex INECEL)<br />

• 8 national experts<br />

CCAS - ESF -<br />

France<br />

• Expert studies<br />

<strong>–</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Selection Criteria<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the precautionary pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong>to<br />

environmental, cultural and economical aspects<br />

Rejection <strong>of</strong> one <strong>project</strong> to avoid the possible change <strong>of</strong> a<br />

natural thermal stream<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled potency to<br />

keep the ecological<br />

caudal over 20% <strong>in</strong><br />

Toabuchi <strong>project</strong><br />

Modification <strong>of</strong> many<br />

<strong>project</strong>s accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

cultural criteria<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Selection Criteria<br />

To prioritize harmony with<br />

touristic and agricultural<br />

activities from the region :<br />

Priority was given to the scenic<br />

waterfall <strong>in</strong> order not to alter a<br />

possible tourism <strong>project</strong><br />

We ruled out a microhydro to<br />

avoid opposition to tourist<br />

development model l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />

the river<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g program for access to skilled employment<br />

• 94 students graduated <strong>in</strong><br />

2010<br />

• 25 students <strong>in</strong> 2011 studies<br />

• $ 35,000 <strong>in</strong>vested<br />

• Topography<br />

• <strong>Hydro</strong>logy<br />

• SIG<br />

• Civil Construcciones<br />

• Cater<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

restaurant


Energy System Hidro<strong>in</strong>tag - Cotacachi<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong> watersheds<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Total <strong>project</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment budget<br />

ITEM DESCRIPTION VALUE<br />

1 Civil works 53.901.496<br />

2 Mechanical equipments 3.630.000<br />

3 Electrical and comunicational equipment 11.187.500<br />

4 Generation equipment 55.353.150<br />

5 Transmission l<strong>in</strong>e 11.385.000<br />

6 Environmental mitigation 2.018.450<br />

7 Community improvemnt works 300.000<br />

Total Construction Works 137.775.596<br />

8 Studies and designs 2.187.000<br />

9 Permits and licencess 675.000<br />

10 Environmental costs 1.155.000<br />

Pre-<strong>in</strong>vestment costs 4.017.000<br />

11 Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istration 8.248.525<br />

12 Prog. Qulified local employment access 890.550<br />

13 Cont<strong>in</strong>gency 5.998.229<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and management<br />

15.137.30<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> the <strong>project</strong> 156.929.900


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Replac<strong>in</strong>g fossil fuels


PRINCIPLE PROJECT DATA<br />

<strong>Hydro</strong>logy:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> river<br />

Bas<strong>in</strong> area (Km2)<br />

Average flow (m3/s)<br />

Design flow(m3/s)<br />

Project swell<strong>in</strong>g flow (Tr 100 years<br />

(m3/s):<br />

Reservoir<br />

Type<br />

Maxium normal level (masl)<br />

Chalguayacu<br />

88<br />

4,5<br />

9<br />

180<br />

Daily<br />

regulation<br />

807<br />

Maxium normal level (masl) 795<br />

Available volume 100


Dam<br />

Type<br />

arc and gravity<br />

concrete<br />

Crown<strong>in</strong>g elevation 810<br />

Length (m) 120<br />

Maxium heght (m) 10 -- 12<br />

Elevation top <strong>of</strong> spilway 807<br />

Lenght (m) top <strong>of</strong> spillway 50<br />

Bottom dra<strong>in</strong>s 2<br />

Radial floodgates BxH (m) 2+2,5<br />

Conduction tunnel<br />

Diameter (m) 2,5<br />

Lenght (m) 200<br />

Equilibrium Chimney<br />

Underground<br />

Height (m) 35<br />

Pressure Pippes<br />

Surface <strong>in</strong> PRV<br />

Diameter (m) 2<br />

Length (m) 300<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>e room<br />

Above ground<br />

Installed powe (mw) 7<br />

Turb<strong>in</strong>e 2 Francis<br />

Net fall <strong>of</strong> design (m) 107<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


1st Phase Process<br />

1 small hydroelectric<br />

Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

1. Completion <strong>of</strong> feasibility and detailed<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g studies <strong>of</strong> the Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

hydroelectric<br />

2. Construction and commission<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

central<br />

3. Completion <strong>of</strong> feasibility studies <strong>of</strong> next 3 small<br />

hydroelectric:<br />

• Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

• Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

• Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


1st phase <strong>in</strong>vestment required<br />

Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

Estimated time: 18 month<br />

Total Consortium <strong>in</strong>vestment required: $ 8.500.000<br />

Investors<br />

6.500.000 2.000.000<br />

• loan from State bank: 1.500.000<br />

• loan from ethic bank: 4.500.000<br />

• own from CT: 500.000<br />

Estimated pr<strong>of</strong>its: $ 2.800.000 /year<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Return on Investment (ROI): 21%<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


2nd Phase Process<br />

1. Detailed eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, construction and<br />

commission<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> next three hydroelectric<br />

21 Mw power:<br />

• Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

• Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

• Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

2. Feasibility studies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong> 60 Mw<br />

hydroelectric<br />

3. Design and detailed eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong> 60<br />

Mw<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


1st phase<br />

2nd phase<br />

3th phase<br />

E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Central & works<br />

Río Chlaguayacu 7 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río <strong>Intag</strong> 60 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

años 1 años 2 años 3 años 4 años 5<br />

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Muchas Gracias

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!