NOTICE OF PREPARATION - City of Manteca

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mitigation Measure 8.1: The developer will comply with the City of Manteca’s Storm Drain Master Plan. Initial Study-07-10 Compliance with the Storm Drain Master Plan requires treatment of runoff for water quality and implementation of postconstruction BMPs to help mitigate water quality degradation and make this impact less than significant. e).The project site is currently vacant and undeveloped and contains permeable soils. The proposed project would substantially increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on the project site through development of the proposed project. The project would contribute to increased sources of polluted runoff during wet weather conditions from urban pollutants that are collected and transported to local drainage infrastructure, including trash, debris, rubber, greases, oils, and other vehicular fluids that leak on surface parking areas. This impact is potentially significant. The applicant will be required to design and construct onsite drainage facilities to City standards, and connect to the City storm drain system. f) The proposed project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 7.2, requiring the project applicant to conform to all applicable water quality standards and waste discharge requirements relative to construction activities and runoff from roadways or other onsite facilities, will ensure that this impact is less than significant. No other potential sources would contribute to water quality degradation. g-h). The proposed project site is not located within a 100-year flood zone but is protected by a levee. Should the levee break, flooding is projected to be limited to one foot depth. There would be less than significant impacts. i) The project site is not located near any significantly sized enclosed body of water or coastal area and is therefore not susceptible to a seiche or tsunami. The site is not located at the foot of any significant topographical feature with the potential to be subject to a mudflow. There would be no impact. Initial Study_Terra Ranch IS 07-10 18
9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Potentially Significant Initial Study-07-10 Initial Study_Terra Ranch IS 07-10 19 Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X a) The subdivision will not physically divide an established community; it will establish a brand new community. There would be no impact. b) The project design and density are not consistent with the Manteca General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (LDR) and High Density Residential (HDR). However, the following mitigation measure will ensure that this impact is lessthan significant. Mitigation Measure 9.1: The applicant is applying for a General Plan Amendment to change the property from LDR (Low Density Residential) and HDR (High Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) and MDR (Medium Density Residential. The developer is also applying for a rezone to change the property from PEC (Planned Employment Center) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) in order to be consistent with the General Plan designation. If approved, the impact will be less than significant. Additionally, during the review process the project will be conditioned to ensure compliance with the Manteca General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. c) Compliance with Mitigation 4.1, as listed above, will reduce any conflict with applicable habitat plans to less than significant. No additional mitigation is needed. Impact No Impact
Page 1 and 2: TO: Responsible and Interested Part
Page 3 and 4: Notice of Completion & Environmenta
Page 5 and 6: DATE: July 21, 2010 TO: Interested
Page 7 and 8: Figure 2 Project Location 3 Project
Page 9 and 10: NOP Comment Period: Written comment
Page 11 and 12: • Rezone of the 74.5-acre site fr
Page 13 and 14: Hydrology and Water Quality The Hyd
Page 15 and 16: A. BACKGROUND: ENVIRONMENTAL INITIA
Page 17 and 18: Assessor’s Parcel Map (Exhibit 2)
Page 19 and 20: Initial Study-07-10 G. EVALUATION O
Page 21 and 22: Initial Study-07-10 b) The site is
Page 23 and 24: Initial Study-07-10 Mitigation Meas
Page 25 and 26: Initial Study-07-10 provide compreh
Page 27 and 28: 6. Geology and Soils. Would the pro
Page 29 and 30: 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
Page 31: 8. Hydrology and Water Quality. Wou
Page 35 and 36: 11. Noise. Would the project result
Page 37 and 38: 12. Population and Housing. Would t
Page 39 and 40: 14. Recreation. a. Would the projec
Page 41 and 42: 16. Utilities and Service Systems.
Page 43 and 44: 17. Global Climate Change. Would th
Page 45: H. I. J. INCORPORATIONS BY REFERENC

NOTICE OF PREPARATION - City of Manteca

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?