28.08.2013 Views

Biomechanics

Biomechanics

Biomechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Biomechanics</strong><br />

J. Paulo Vilas-Boas, Ph.D<br />

Leandro Machado, Ph.D<br />

jpvb@fade.up.pt; lmachado@fade.up.pt; filipas@fade.up.pt<br />

4- Cinemetria (FS)<br />

- APAS<br />

- Radar<br />

- Acelerómetro<br />

Filipa Sousa, Ph.D<br />

5- Dinâmica (LM)<br />

- Força/ Equilíbrio de forças<br />

- Momento<br />

- Trabalho e Energia<br />

- Pressão<br />

6- Dinamometria (FS)<br />

- Célula de carga<br />

- Plataforma de forças<br />

- Pressão Plantar<br />

Aulas<br />

Programa<br />

1- Apresentação<br />

- Introdução à Biomecânica (JPVB)<br />

2- Fundamentos de trigonometria e geometria (LM)<br />

3- Cinemática (FS)<br />

- Posição, Deslocamento<br />

- Planos e eixos<br />

- Movimentos anatómicos<br />

- Escalas<br />

- Tipos de movimento<br />

- Velocidade (LM)<br />

- Aceleração<br />

7- Dinâmica de Fluídos (LM, JPVB)<br />

- CFD<br />

8 - Mecânica Músculo-tendinosa (FS)<br />

9 - EMG (LM)<br />

10- Biomecânica das habilidades fundamentais (FS)<br />

- Marcha<br />

- Corrida<br />

- Saltos<br />

- Lançamentos<br />

11- Projectos (LM) (FS)


Bibliografia<br />

<strong>Biomechanics</strong><br />

Introductory concepts<br />

Introductory concepts


Força / Peso<br />

Força / Peso<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Nelson Évora - componente vertical 4 passagens<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Naide Gomes - componente vertical 3 passagens<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm


BIO MECHANICS<br />

Physics<br />

Thermodynamics (energetics)<br />

Electricity<br />

Optics<br />

Biophysics<br />

Biology<br />

Bioenergetics<br />

Bioelectricity<br />

Bio-optics<br />

Mechanics <strong>Biomechanics</strong><br />

<br />

<br />

MECHANICS<br />

Physics:<br />

“The quest for the TOTAL theory”<br />

The movement (and balance) study<br />

How is the movement (or balance) like?<br />

What causes the movement (or balance)?


BIO<br />

Complexity:<br />

Organization:<br />

Heterogeneity<br />

Articulated<br />

Redundant<br />

Behavior:<br />

Self propelled<br />

Arbitrary<br />

Biodiversity<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

Non<br />

deterministic<br />

The forces produced and<br />

acting over the biological<br />

systems, and the<br />

movements and balances<br />

that they produce<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

The study of the<br />

biological systems,<br />

based on criterions,<br />

principles, laws, and<br />

methods of mechanics<br />

Historical highlights<br />

From Nigg & Herzog (1994)


Historical highlights Historical highlights<br />

Historical highlights<br />

Antiquity – Greeks – Natural Philosophy<br />

Thales (624-545 B.C.)<br />

Pythagoras<br />

(582 B.C.) &<br />

Hippocrates<br />

(470-360 B.C.)<br />

From Nigg & Herzog (1994)<br />

Natural science detached from religion<br />

“…all things have form, all things are form, and all forms can be defined by<br />

numbers”<br />

Pythagoras believed that mathematical relations held the secrets of the<br />

universe, including music.<br />

Hippocrates’ emphasis on observation and experience of the senses<br />

pioneered the use of rational scientific thought in the practice of<br />

medicine.<br />

Antiquity<br />

Maya<br />

Egyptians<br />

Mesopotamians<br />

Phoenicians<br />

Greeks<br />

Developed knowledge:<br />

Astronomy, Mathematics, …<br />

Leisure & Sport<br />

Natural Philosophy<br />

Golden age<br />

Hellenistic age<br />

Conquest by the Roman Empire<br />

Historical highlights<br />

Antiquity – Greeks – Golden age<br />

Plato (427-347 B.C.) believed the world of senses to be an illusory shadow of<br />

reality. Ideas were the only reality, and true knowledge could not be obtained<br />

through the study of nature. The pursuit of truth required contemplation, not<br />

action.<br />

Politics and Ethics prevail.<br />

Knowledge & Myth<br />

Kinematics<br />

and Art;<br />

Surface<br />

Anatomy<br />

(Plato and Aristotle)<br />

Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) believed that mathematics provided a good model for a well-organized<br />

science, and that science is aimed to explain nature.<br />

Aristotle believed life was capable of mechanical expression. According to him, every motion<br />

presupposed a mover.<br />

All that is moved, should be moved by something else. The MOTOR must either be present within<br />

the mobile, or be in direct contact with it. Action at a distance was inconceivable.<br />

Aristotle's’ text About the Movement of Animals, described movement and locomotion (gait,<br />

muscular action,…) for the first time, based on observation.<br />

“… for just as the pusher pushes, so the pusher is pushed”


Historical highlights<br />

Antiquity – Greeks – The Hellenistic age<br />

Founded by the conquests of Alexander the Grate<br />

and the foundation of Alexandria (The Museum of Alexandria)<br />

Herophilos (300 B.C.) – Created the modern Anatomy and Physiology, with the systematic dissection.<br />

Erasistratis (280 B.C) – Applied physical concepts to the understanding of anatomy. Was the first to<br />

describe the muscles as organs of contraction.<br />

Archimedes (287-212 B.C.) – With a lever he will move the Earth if he have a place<br />

to stand to do so.<br />

Equilibrium of Planes – How to find the CG of parallelogram, triangle, trapezium<br />

Floating Bodies – Principles of water displacement<br />

“How to move a given weight by given force?”<br />

He dominated Statics and Hydrostatics until the time of Stevin (1548-1620) and<br />

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)<br />

Historical highlights<br />

Antiquity<br />

- Knowledge and myth were separated<br />

- Mechanical and mathematical paradigms were developed<br />

- Anatomical paradigms were developed<br />

- First biomechanical analysis of the human body was performed<br />

Historical highlights<br />

Antiquity – Greeks – The conquest by Rome<br />

Hero of Alexandria 62 ( A.D.) – Teaches Physics at Alexandria (Mechanics, Optics, Pneumatics) He used<br />

gases to invent mechanisms.<br />

The Aristotelic causes of movement<br />

Galen 131-201 ( A.D.) – Physician of the College of Gladiators, became probably the first Sport<br />

Physician in History.<br />

De Usu Partium (the Use of the Parts) is considered to be the first text on Physiology<br />

De Motu Musculorum (On the movement of muscles) established Myology. “…enervation that makes<br />

muscle substance into muscle proper” (the transmitters of the spiritus animalius from the brain into<br />

the muscle.<br />

He described tonus, and distinguished between agonistic and antagonistic muscles, and motor and<br />

sensory nerves.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Middle Ages (200 B.C.-1450 A.D.)<br />

Scientific Development decreased<br />

Religious and spiritual<br />

development increased<br />

Those were the ages of the ARAB scholars, saving knowledge by translating the texts from<br />

Greek to Arabic<br />

St. Augustine (354-430 A.D.) incorporated Neoplatonic doctrines into<br />

Christian beliefs.<br />

“… the only type of knowledge to be desired was the knowledge of God<br />

and the Soul, and no profit was to be had from investigating the realm of<br />

nature”<br />

St. Thomas Aquinas (1277) integrated Aristotelian philosophy into<br />

Christian beliefs, from the Arabic translations.<br />

Contributions of the MA to the development of <strong>Biomechanics</strong> are minimal.


Historical highlights<br />

The Italian Renaissance (1450-1527)<br />

The revival of ancient Greek Philosophy, Literature, Art and freedom of thought and<br />

ethics. Nevertheless a scientific community didn’t exist.<br />

The authority of the church was replaced by the authority of the<br />

ancients<br />

Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) and Machiavelli<br />

emerged as the Renaissance men.<br />

The parallelogram of forces, simple and compound forces, studied friction, and questioned<br />

Aristotle’s relationships between force, weight, and velocity.<br />

“… an object offers as much resistance to the air as the air does to the object”<br />

Da Vinci’s mechanical analysis of human movement included joints, muscles, bones, ligaments,<br />

tendons and cartilage. He discarded the Aristotelian theory of Pneuma. “Spiritual force” replaced<br />

it.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Italian Renaissance (1450-1527)<br />

- Scientific work was revived<br />

- The foundations of modern anatomy and physiology were laid<br />

- Movement and muscle action were studied as connected<br />

entities.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Italian Renaissance (1450-1527)<br />

Vasselius (1514-1564) – Was authorised to make dissections of<br />

cadavers of executed criminals and noticed that Galen’s anatomy<br />

mixed human and animal characteristics.<br />

De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem was published in 1543,<br />

in the same year as Copernico’s Revolutionibus Orbium<br />

Coelestium.<br />

Vesalius demonstrated that muscle shortens and become thicker<br />

during contraction.<br />

He consider muscle to be compose of the substance of the<br />

ligament and tendon, being divided into a great number of fibres<br />

Fallopius (1523-1562) – Was mainly devoted to fibrous tissues:<br />

“… motion requires a fibrous nature sin the actual body that is<br />

moved.”. He adopted the Galen’s theory that the Spiritus<br />

Animalis was the cause of muscular contraction, and carrier of<br />

the motor/spiritual function of the brain.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVII th century<br />

Kings, Counts, wealthy families, Universities, and the Vatican supported men of science -<br />

Galileu Galilei (1564-1642), Kepler (1571-1630), Descartes (1596-1650), Newton (1642-1727)<br />

Intellectual freedom, as well as new ideas and finings were highly respected<br />

Experimentation becomes the cornerstone<br />

Galileu Galilei (1564-1642) – Showed that the rate of a fall is not a function of the falling object’s<br />

weight (Aristotelian approach).<br />

He was about to publish De Animaliam Motibus (The movement of animals), previously than<br />

Borelli’s De Motu Animalum (1680-81) by 40 years!<br />

He studied the biomechanics of human jump, the gait oh horses and insects, and human<br />

floatability conditions (Discourses on Two New Sciences, 1638).<br />

Scaling foundations were introduced (the three times sized animal femur).


Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVIIth century<br />

Galileu Galilei (1564-1642) The father of <strong>Biomechanics</strong><br />

Theory of uniform movement<br />

Theory of projectiles<br />

Theory of the inclined plane<br />

The definition of Momentum<br />

Foundations for the three laws of Newton<br />

“If I was able to see further was because I stood<br />

on the shoulders of giants”<br />

Santorio (1561-1636) – Weighted himself and his solid and liquid inputs and<br />

output, experiments were laying the foundations of metabolism.<br />

William Harvey (1578-1657) – Discovered circulation, the capillaries<br />

connecting the arterial and venous circulation (without a microscope!), and<br />

the systole as the active action of the heart (against Gelen’s concept).<br />

Described the heart as a pump. He was the first “Cardiac Biomechanicist”.<br />

He died of a stroke.<br />

Renée Descartes (1596-1650) – Discovered the Cartesian Coordinate System observing a fly in<br />

the corner of the bedroom. One of the fathers of Mechanical Philosophy: “Changes observed in<br />

the natural world should be explained only in terms of motion and rearrangements of parts of<br />

matter” (L’homme, 1664, distinguish man from animals by the soul).<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVIIth century<br />

Isaac Newton (1642-1727), the “orchestra conductor”<br />

(Koestler, 1959)<br />

Kepler´s lows of motion of heavenly bodies<br />

Galileo’s law of falling bodies and projectiles<br />

Descartes law of inertia which require straight motion if no external force acted<br />

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Methematica (1686)<br />

The law of inertia<br />

The law of acceleration due to an acting force<br />

The law of action and reaction<br />

The law of gravity<br />

The fundamental tool for kinematic and<br />

kinetic analysis of movement<br />

All motions in the universe can be described and / or predicted. As long as the movement was<br />

with relative speeds, which were small compared to the speed of light.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVIIth century<br />

Giovanni Borelli (1608-1679), was granted by Queen Christina for the<br />

investigation of the mechanics of the human body<br />

The father of <strong>Biomechanics</strong>?<br />

The Motu Animalum, 1680<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVIIth century<br />

Jan Swammerdam (1643-1680) – Constancy of frog’s muscle volume during contraction<br />

William Croone (1633-1684) – The brain must send a signal to the muscles to cause contraction<br />

Niels Stensen (1638-1686) – Precise descriptions of muscular structure<br />

Francis Glisson (1597-1677) – The theory of irritability of muscles<br />

Clopton Havers (1655-1702) – Systematic study of bone with a microscope. Bone is organic and<br />

inorganic in nature, with tubular cavities.


Historical highlights<br />

The Scientific Revolution of the XVIIth century<br />

- Experiment and theory were introduced as complementary parts<br />

of scientific investigation<br />

- The Newtonian mechanics was established<br />

- The Mechanical Philosophy and Newtonian mechanics provide<br />

impetus to study human movement<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Enlightenment: XVIIIth Century<br />

Science was not organized as today: the current subdivision into disciplines started at that time!<br />

Von Haller (1708-1777) – Recognised the role of electricity (a new discover) in muscle contraction,<br />

but refrain to associate it to the “spiritus animalius” that controlled movements<br />

Keill (1674-1719) – Calculated the number of fibres in a certain muscle and the tension per fibre to<br />

lift a given weight<br />

Daniel Bernoulli (11700-1728) – Developed a mechanical theory of muscle contraction. Breathing<br />

and the mechanical work of the heart were also studied.<br />

Nicholas Andre (1658-1742) – Coined the term “orthopaedics” (1741) and postulated that muscle<br />

unbalances can produce skeleton deformities. Exercise in childhood is recommended to prevent<br />

deformities<br />

Jean Jallabert (1746) – Was the first to rehabilitate paralysed muscles through electricity<br />

Luigi Galvani (1737-1798) – Muscles and nervous cells are able to produce electricity<br />

- Galvanic Electricity. He is considered the father of Bioelectricity.<br />

Robert Whytt (1714-1766) – Demonstrate the reflex action in the spinal chord in 1751,<br />

and localized the sites of single reflexes<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Enlightenment: XVIII th Century<br />

Science was not organized as today: the current subdivision into disciplines started at that time!<br />

Euler (1707-1783), D’Alembert, Lagrange<br />

Euler (1707-1783) – Expanded Newton’s laws to be applied to rigid and<br />

fluid bodies on Earth, and not only to material points and celestial<br />

bodies. He start to develop the concept of conservation of energy<br />

D’Alembert (1717-1783) – Expanded Newton’s action / reaction law to<br />

moving objects<br />

Lagrange (1736-1815) – Treated mechanical problems with differential<br />

calculus. Newton’s 2nd law was expressed in terms of kinetic and<br />

potential energy.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The Enlightenment: XVIIIth Century<br />

- The concept of force become more clearly understood<br />

- The concepts of conservation of momentum and energy started<br />

to develop<br />

- Mathematical consolidation of mechanical laws took place<br />

- Muscle contraction and action was recognised as influenced by<br />

mechanical, bio-chemical, and electrical forces


Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Development of science and its applications to human movement during the XIX th century was<br />

influenced by the XVIII th Century, namely: Rousseau, the Watt’s Steam Machine, and the French<br />

Revolution<br />

Development of<br />

sport and leisure<br />

J. J. Rousseau (1712-1778) – Emile (1762) – Revived the<br />

complementarities between body and mind, encouraging the return to<br />

NATURE and PHYSICAL ACTIVITY<br />

J. Watt (1736-1819) – Invented the Steam Machine (1777) – Potentiated<br />

the industrial revolution, the LEISURE time, recreation, and SPORTS<br />

French Revolution (1789) – The end of the monopoly of leisure and<br />

sports by the dominant social classes.<br />

Renewed scientific interest in human locomotion<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Marey (1838-1904)<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Renewed scientific interest in human locomotion<br />

Observation<br />

Photography Quantification of human and animal locomotion<br />

Eduard Weber (1795-1881) and Wilhelm Weber (1804-1891) – Published in<br />

1836 the “Die Mechanik der menchlichen Gewerkzeuge” (On the mechanics of<br />

the human gait tools)<br />

Etienne Jules Marey (1838-1904) – Transformed the science<br />

of locomotion from observational to one based on<br />

quantification<br />

Edward Muybridge (1830-1904) – Was introduced to animal<br />

movement analysis by Mr. Stanford (Stanford University),<br />

to explain high speed trot in horses. He produced about<br />

20.000 images of human and animal locomotion.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Marey (1838-1904)<br />

Etienne Jules Marey (1838-1904) – Was the first to combine and synchronize kinematic and<br />

kinetic measurements.<br />

Storage and reutilization of elastic energy<br />

He also provide insight into:<br />

Ground reaction forces and CG movement<br />

EMG patterns<br />

Dependency of energy cost on movement characteristics


Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Chronophotography<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Muybridge (1830-1904)<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Animal Locomotion<br />

Animals in Locomotion<br />

The Human Figure in Motion<br />

Muybridge (1830-1904)<br />

Wilhelm Braune & Otto Fischer (1891) – Conducted the first 3D analysis of human gate, making precise<br />

mathematical analysis possible. They used night photographs of light tubes over a black suit.<br />

They used night photographs of light tubes over a<br />

black suit. The preparation of each subject took<br />

8h.<br />

The CG and moments of inertia of the body and all segments were calculated experimentally, with the use<br />

of two frozen cadavers<br />

Braune died after data collection and Fischer took<br />

several years to complete data processing, which<br />

is now performed in REAL TIME<br />

Der Gang des Menschen (1895-1904)


Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Du Bois Reymond (1818-1922) and Duchene (1806-1875) – Laid the foundations of electromyography<br />

Refined the methods for measuring currents in 1841, and traced electricity in<br />

contracting muscle to its independent fibres<br />

Volkmann (1862) – Described the effects of pressure on bone growth<br />

In 1866 published Physiologie des Movements,<br />

which describe the function of every important<br />

superficial muscle<br />

Van Mayer (1867) – Described the relationship between the bone architecture and its function<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XX th Century<br />

Characteristics of the XXth century that influenced the development of <strong>Biomechanics</strong>:<br />

Mechanical, industrial and technological development associated to two world wars<br />

Popular, social and financial recognition of Sport and human performance<br />

Explosion of financial support for medical and health care research<br />

Cochran & Stobbs (1968), from Bartlett (1997) Silveira et al. (2005), Radiol. Bras.<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

- Measuring methods were developed to quantify kinematics and<br />

kinetics, and were extensively applied to human gait analysis<br />

- Measuring methods were developed to quantify electrical current<br />

during muscular activity<br />

- Engineering principles were applied to biological and<br />

biomechanical analysis<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XIX th Century: the gait century<br />

Light-trace Photography<br />

Vilas-Boas (1994)


Historical highlights<br />

The XX th Century<br />

Jules Amar (1920) – Published The Human Motor analysing physical and physiologic components<br />

of work, focusing into efficiency of human movements<br />

Nicholas Bernstein (1896-1966) – Conducted “biodynamic” studies of human gait based on<br />

mathematical approaches. Approached to ergonomics and studied coordination and regulation of<br />

movement in both children and adults, creating theories of motor control and coordination<br />

A. V. Hill (1886-1977) – Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine in 1923, experiencing on the<br />

explanation of mechanical and structural function of human muscle<br />

Elfman (1939) – Quantified internal forces in muscles and joints. Concluded that muscles act<br />

regulating energy exchange, by using the strategies of transmission, absorption, release, and<br />

dissipation<br />

A. F. Huxley (1924- ) – Explained muscle shortening in 1953 through the sliding filament theory,<br />

lately expanded to his Cross-bridge Theory<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XX th Century<br />

- <strong>Biomechanics</strong> developed as a discipline at the Universities<br />

- Biomechanical research results were increasingly used in<br />

practical applications (sports, medicine, industry)<br />

- <strong>Biomechanics</strong> become a player in a multidisciplinary attempt to<br />

understand human and animal movement and the effects of<br />

movement on the muscle-skeletal system<br />

Historical highlights<br />

The XX th Century<br />

The first breakthrough of biomechanics into the curricula of Universities was in sport related<br />

disciplines in the early XXth century. Some Faculties of Physical Education start teaching<br />

<strong>Biomechanics</strong><br />

<strong>Biomechanics</strong> vs. Kinesiology<br />

21-23 August 1967 – First International Seminar on <strong>Biomechanics</strong> – Zürich – Switzerland.<br />

Chairman : Wartenweiler<br />

International Council of Sport and Physical Education of UNESCO<br />

Topics:<br />

- Technique of motion studies<br />

- Telemetry<br />

- Principles of human motion studies: general aspects of coordination<br />

- Applied <strong>Biomechanics</strong> in work<br />

- Applied <strong>Biomechanics</strong> in sports<br />

- Clinical aspects<br />

1973 – ISB was founded during the Penn State conference – Wartenweiler (1st President)<br />

(International Congress of <strong>Biomechanics</strong>, since 1975 in Jyväskylä, Finland)<br />

(World Congress of <strong>Biomechanics</strong>, 1989, San Diego, USA)<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

Ergonomical biomechanics<br />

Work biomechanics<br />

Occupational biomechanics<br />

Clinical biomechanics<br />

(...)<br />

Orthopaedical biomechanics<br />

Traumatological biomechanics<br />

Sports biomechanics


Sports biomechanics<br />

Aims:<br />

to describe<br />

to interpret<br />

to explain<br />

to model<br />

to simulate<br />

to transform<br />

to optimize<br />

Sport<br />

movements<br />

Sport<br />

technique<br />

to optimize<br />

Sport<br />

equipments<br />

and materials<br />

to prevent<br />

injuries<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

Non-deterministic science<br />

Mathematically<br />

based<br />

Complex<br />

procedures<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

<strong>Biomechanics</strong> is somewhat more than<br />

strict mechanics of rigid bodies<br />

Some of the biomechanical systems<br />

(bodies) are much more complex...<br />

Articulated<br />

Generators<br />

of forces<br />

Independent Redundant<br />

... specially in sports biomechanics<br />

BIO MECHANICS<br />

Biomechanically, the HUMAN BODY can<br />

be defined as:<br />

A complex system of articulated<br />

segments where movement is<br />

produced by external forces, and by<br />

internal forces, acting out of the<br />

articular axes, that induces angular<br />

displacements of the segments<br />

Based in Amadio (1996)


BIO MECHANICS<br />

V<br />

External<br />

biomechanics<br />

Internal<br />

biomechanics<br />

MECHANICS<br />

Statics<br />

Dynamics<br />

Kinematics<br />

Kinetics<br />

Fm<br />

Homunculi control of human movement<br />

MECHANICS<br />

Statics<br />

Dynamics<br />

from Voughan et al. (1999)<br />

Kinematics<br />

Kinetics


MECHANICS<br />

F = m . a<br />

Dynamics<br />

Unbalanced<br />

forces<br />

SF = 0<br />

m<br />

Kinematics<br />

Kinetics<br />

R<br />

SF = R<br />

SF = R = m * a<br />

a = 0<br />

a = const.<br />

a = variable<br />

MECHANICS<br />

Statics<br />

m<br />

SF = 0<br />

a = 0 (SF = m * a)<br />

Balance<br />

Static balance:<br />

no movement (v = 0)<br />

Dynamic balance:<br />

uniform movement (a = 0; v = const.)<br />

F = m . a<br />

M F = I . a<br />

M F = F . r<br />

I = m . r 2


l 1<br />

F<br />

F * l 1 > < R * l 2<br />

F * l 1 = R * l 2<br />

l2 <br />

<br />

<br />

R<br />

Areas of complex BIOMECHANICAL evaluation:<br />

KINEMETRY ANTHROPOMETRY DYNAMOMETRY EMG<br />

Position<br />

Orientation<br />

(time)<br />

Movement<br />

(Displacement)<br />

Velocity<br />

Acceleration<br />

Dimensions<br />

linear<br />

surfaces<br />

volumes<br />

Inertial<br />

characteristics<br />

mass<br />

moment of inertia<br />

Inverse dynamometry<br />

F = m * a<br />

Forces<br />

internal<br />

external<br />

Moments<br />

(torques)<br />

Pressures<br />

Muscular<br />

activity<br />

Thermography<br />

(adapted from Baumann, 1995)<br />

Anthropometry


Biomechanical anthropometry<br />

Zatsiorski adapted by de Leva (1996):<br />

Segment<br />

Mass<br />

(%)<br />

Longitudinal spot<br />

of the CM (%)<br />

r<br />

sagital<br />

(%)<br />

r<br />

transverse<br />

(%)<br />

r<br />

frontal<br />

(%)<br />

F M F M F M F M F M<br />

Head 6.68 6.94 58.94 59.76 33.0 36.2 35.9 37.6 31.8 31.2<br />

Trunk 42.57 43.46 41.51 44.86 35.7 37.2 33.9 34.7 17.1 19.1<br />

Trunk S 15.45 15.96 20.77 29.99 74.6 71.6 50.2 45.4 71.8 65.9<br />

Trunk M 14.65 16.33 45.12 45.02 43.3 48.2 35.4 38.3 41.5 46.8<br />

Trunk I 12.47 11.17 49.20 61.15 43.3 61.5 40.2 55.1 44.4 58.7<br />

Arm 2.55 2.71 57.54 57.72 27.8 28.5 26.0 26.9 14.8 15.8<br />

Lower Arm 1.38 1.62 45.59 45.74 26.1 27.6 25.7 26.5 9.4 12.1<br />

Hand 0.56 0.61 74.74 79.00 53.1 62.8 45.4 51.3 33.5 40.1<br />

Tight 14.78 14.16 36.12 40.95 36.9 32.9 36.4 32.9 16.2 14.9<br />

leg 4.81 4.33 44.16 44.59 27.1 25.5 26.7 24.9 9.3 10.3<br />

foot 1.29 1.37 40.14 44.15 29.9 25.7 27.9 24.5 13.9 12.4<br />

Filme<br />

Muybridge<br />

(1830 - 1904)<br />

Kinemetry<br />

Quantitative<br />

Detailed numeric<br />

description of<br />

movement<br />

Videogrametria<br />

SIMI<br />

Number of<br />

cameras<br />

Synchronization Calibration<br />

Electromagnetic video<br />

Low frequency (


Digitizing the coordinates<br />

of each joint centre in<br />

each image…<br />

Referencing anatomical<br />

landmarks to a<br />

anthropometric<br />

biomechanical model<br />

We obtain the position of<br />

each model part (segment)<br />

and of the total CM<br />

It is possible to differentiate velocities and<br />

accelerations, and to estimate forces<br />

Kinematics<br />

Video<br />

Recording and<br />

processing images<br />

Kinematics<br />

Axes<br />

Planes<br />

Coordinates<br />

Planar (2D)<br />

Spatial (3D)<br />

Position<br />

Position vector<br />

Orthogonal<br />

components of<br />

the position<br />

vector<br />

Displacement<br />

(displacement vector)<br />

P 1<br />

ISB<br />

convention<br />

P 2<br />

yy<br />

Calibrating the space for<br />

real metric coordinates<br />

acquisition<br />

P 2<br />

zz<br />

P 1<br />

xx<br />

Kinematics<br />

Video<br />

Recording and<br />

processing images


Kinematics<br />

Video<br />

Recording and<br />

processing images<br />

Dual-media video images for videogrametry<br />

Vilas-Boas et al. (1997)<br />

Dual-media video images for videogrametry<br />

Vilas-Boas et al. (1997)<br />

Dual-media video images for videogrametry<br />

Vilas-Boas et al. (1997)


Dual-media video images for videogrametry<br />

Kinematics<br />

Velocimetry<br />

Lima et al. (2006)<br />

Kinematics<br />

Velocimetry<br />

Kinematics<br />

Cable velocimeters: Velocimetry<br />

Cable velocimeters:<br />

Cable velocimeters:


Kinematics<br />

Velocimetry<br />

Kinematics<br />

Velocimetry<br />

Kinematics<br />

Cable velocimeters: Velocimetry<br />

Kinematics<br />

Cable velocimeters: Velocimetry<br />

Cable velocimeters:<br />

Cable velocimeters:


Dynamometry<br />

Direct dynamics<br />

F S F = m . a a<br />

Dynamics<br />

Force transducers<br />

Force plates<br />

- Force plates<br />

- Dynamic pressure transduction<br />

- Load cells<br />

:inverse dynamics<br />

- Other methods and transducers<br />

Force plates<br />

Força / Peso<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Different types 3D sensors<br />

Dynamics<br />

Nelson Évora - componente vertical 4 passagens<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm<br />

(Bartlett, 1997)<br />

Components of force and<br />

torques that act upon the<br />

subject<br />

Força / Peso<br />

Força / Peso<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

Nelson Évora - componente antero-posterior 4 passagens<br />

-8<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

Force plates<br />

Nelson Évora - componente médio-lateral 4 passagens<br />

-2<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm


Força / Peso<br />

força normalizada<br />

Dynamics<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Naide Gomes - componente vertical 3 passagens<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm<br />

Dynamics<br />

-1<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Vertical:<br />

Máx: 5.95 * Peso = 4422.2 N, aos 0.025 s<br />

força normalizada<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

t apoio = paulo1 0.167 Paulo s componente vertical<br />

t apoio = marisa1 0.154 Marisa s componente vertical<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Vertical:<br />

Máx: 7.00 * Peso = 3797.0 N, aos 0.013 s<br />

força normalizada<br />

força normalizada<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

Força / Peso<br />

-1<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t norm<br />

Força / Peso<br />

-5<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Antero-posterior:<br />

Máx: 4.60 * Peso = 3419.2 N, aos 0.022 s<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

-5<br />

-6<br />

paulo1 Paulo componente antero-posterior<br />

marisa1 Marisa componente antero-posterior<br />

-5<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Antero-posterior:<br />

Máx: 4.38 * Peso = 2376.6 N, aos 0.015 s<br />

Force plates<br />

Naide Gomes - componente médio-lateral 3 passagens<br />

Naide Gomes - componente antero-posterior 3 passagens<br />

-7<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

t<br />

norm<br />

força normalizada<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

Force plates<br />

paulo1 Paulo componente médio-lateral<br />

-1<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Médio-lateral:<br />

Máx: 0.91 * Peso = 675.2 N, aos 0.029 s<br />

força normalizada<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

marisa1 Marisa componente médio-lateral<br />

-0.5<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

tempo normalizado<br />

Médio-lateral:<br />

Máx: 1.17 * Peso = 636.4 N, aos 0.022 s<br />

Stalker ATS<br />

Dynamics<br />

Force transducers<br />

Force plates<br />

v (m/s)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Naide_26Fev - speed vs. distance - 3 attempts<br />

0<br />

-40 -35 -30 -25 -20<br />

d (m)<br />

mean<br />

-15 -10 -5 0


Stabilogrametry<br />

Vilas-Boas, Carvalho, Lopes, Gonçalves, Sousa (2003). Biomechanical analysis of acute backpack load<br />

consequences on children’s gait.<br />

(Subj. 7)<br />

0% 15% 30%<br />

Dynamics Pressure transducers<br />

Dynamic pressure transduction


Internal forces assessment<br />

Intrusive measures vs. inverse dynamics<br />

EMG<br />

Provides<br />

information<br />

on:<br />

timing<br />

sequencing<br />

relative intensity<br />

of contraction<br />

force (...???)<br />

fatigue<br />

Activity of<br />

various<br />

muscle<br />

groups<br />

EMG<br />

Not a biomechanical<br />

technique<br />

That’s a bioelectrical<br />

(biophysical)<br />

technique<br />

EMG<br />

Sensors<br />

(electrodes)<br />

Data<br />

processing<br />

Data acquisition and processing<br />

Conditioners<br />

(amplifiers & filters)<br />

A/D<br />

converter<br />

PC<br />

Based on Soares, R. (2005)


EMG<br />

Type<br />

Derivation<br />

Pre-<br />

-amplification<br />

Data acquisition and processing EMG Data acquisition and processing<br />

Electrodes<br />

kneel wire surface<br />

mono-polar bipolar multi-polar<br />

passive<br />

active<br />

Based on Soares, R. (2005)<br />

Electrodes anatomical location<br />

Electrodes oriented according the fibers arrangement, with detection surfaces perpendicularly oriented<br />

1st third<br />

Middle<br />

3th third<br />

Signal attenuation away from<br />

the middle point<br />

Middle point of the muscle length<br />

Motor spot<br />

Signal attenuation in the<br />

muscle/ tendon union<br />

0.0000 5.0000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000<br />

seconds<br />

Adapted from de Luca (1997)<br />

EMG Data acquisition and processing<br />

<br />

<br />

iEMG (AU)<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

N=40<br />

4 subjects<br />

0 20 40 60 80<br />

Load (% máx.)<br />

EMG<br />

ABS<br />

envelope<br />

RMS<br />

iEMG<br />

Ângulo<br />

iEMG<br />

0.0000 5.0000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000<br />

seconds<br />

10.0000<br />

5.00000<br />

0.00000<br />

-5.00000<br />

-10.0000<br />

10.0000<br />

8.00000<br />

6.00000<br />

4.00000<br />

2.00000<br />

0.00000<br />

3.00000<br />

2.00000<br />

1.00000<br />

0.00000<br />

5.00000<br />

4.00000<br />

3.00000<br />

2.00000<br />

1.00000<br />

0.00000<br />

2.50000<br />

2.00000<br />

1.50000<br />

1.00000<br />

0.50000<br />

0.00000<br />

-0.50000<br />

120.000<br />

100.000<br />

80.0000<br />

60.0000<br />

40.0000<br />

20.0000<br />

2.50000<br />

2.00000<br />

1.50000<br />

1.00000<br />

0.50000<br />

0.00000<br />

-0.50000<br />

mV<br />

mV<br />

mV<br />

mV/sqrt(s)<br />

mV.s<br />

graus<br />

mV.s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!