Strategic Housing Investment Plan 2010 - Falkirk Council
Strategic Housing Investment Plan 2010 - Falkirk Council
Strategic Housing Investment Plan 2010 - Falkirk Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Strategic</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2011 - 2016<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Corporate & Neighbourhood Services
Contents<br />
Contents<br />
Executive Summary<br />
STRATEGIC HOUSING INVESTMENT PLAN 2011- 2016<br />
1. Introduction 9-10<br />
2. Moving Forward – The LHS Framework 11-17<br />
3. <strong>Housing</strong> Need, Demand and Supply 19-28<br />
4. <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Land Supply 29-37<br />
5. SHIP Summary Update 38-39<br />
6. Resources 40-51<br />
7. New Funding Models and Procurement 52-54<br />
8. Regeneration 55-56<br />
9. Sustainability 57-60<br />
10. Conclusion 61-62<br />
Appendices<br />
1. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
1a. 5 Year SHIP Template<br />
1b. 5 Year SHIP Programme<br />
1c. 5 Year SHIP Financial Profile<br />
1d. Shadow Programme (5 Year Programme & Financial Profile)<br />
1e. 5 Year <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme<br />
2. Moving Forward - The LHS Framework<br />
2a. LHS Task Group Structure<br />
2b. Group Structures<br />
3. Equalities<br />
3a. Equalities Information from RSL Waiting Lists for 2011 - 2016 SHIP<br />
3b. Equalities Information for New Build Lets by <strong>Housing</strong> by RSL 2009-10<br />
3c. Equalities Impact Assessment <strong>2010</strong><br />
4. <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Land Supply - <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit<br />
4a. <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit - Sites with an Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Requirement<br />
4b. Maps by Sub Area - <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit Sites with Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Requirement<br />
5. <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Land Supply - Current & Future Land Supply<br />
Private & Confidential<br />
6. <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Land Supply - Constraints<br />
6a. Cross Service Pre-Development Consultation Proforma<br />
6b. Development Project Checklist<br />
7. Project Summary<br />
8. Project Prioritisation - Scoring Criteria and RSL Project Assessments<br />
9. New Funding Models and Procurement - Average <strong>Housing</strong> Association Grant<br />
Requirements<br />
2<br />
Page No.<br />
2-3<br />
5-7
SHIP Maps<br />
1. <strong>Housing</strong> Need - Provision within SHIP, by <strong>Housing</strong> Submarket Area<br />
2. Priority Areas & Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation Map<br />
3. Regeneration Projects within Priority Areas<br />
4. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme<br />
5. SHIP Projects - Land Ownership<br />
6. <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
7. On Site Projects<br />
8. <strong>2010</strong>/11 Projects<br />
9. <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Projects Maps<br />
10. Shadow Project Maps<br />
11. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Projects within the SHIP<br />
12. Sub Area Maps<br />
3
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Executive Summary<br />
All local authorities are required to submit an annual <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
(SHIP) to the Scottish Government that sets key priorities in relation to the provision of<br />
affordable housing in their areas and the level of investment required to deliver this. This<br />
SHIP has been prepared at a time of significant uncertainty for public sector expenditure.<br />
In 2009-10, investment in new affordable housing in the <strong>Council</strong> area was higher than it<br />
has ever been at £9.134m, however, in the light of the <strong>Strategic</strong> Spending Review, the<br />
Scottish Government has now asked local authorities to consider the impact of a potential<br />
25% cut in funding for new housing over the next five years and has cautioned that a 40%<br />
cut may be a possibility. The potential impact of cuts of this scale on the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
area are set out in Section 6 of this SHIP. In this context it is more important than ever<br />
that every effort is made to maximise the impact of every pound available.<br />
Against this background of anticipated cuts, this SHIP sets out a clear programme for the<br />
delivery of new affordable housing in the <strong>Council</strong> area for the next five years. It has been<br />
structured in such a way that projects can be brought forward if additional funding<br />
becomes available. The programme is founded upon close partnership working between<br />
the <strong>Council</strong> and its development partners and openness and transparency underpin the<br />
joint work undertaken with the aim of providing new homes and more choice for people in<br />
housing need.<br />
A summary of the key facts underpinning this SHIP is set out below:<br />
• Research undertaken in 2007 indicated that there was an annual shortfall of 145<br />
affordable homes across the <strong>Council</strong> area over the next ten years, with<br />
particular pressures in Polmont, Larbert, Stenhousemuir and the Rural North. A<br />
new <strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment (HNDA) is currently being<br />
finalised and will provide new planning figures that will inform the next Local<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Strategy (LHS). The new LHS which will cover the period 2011-16, will<br />
be published next Autumn and will set out the context for the 2012-17 and<br />
subsequent SHIPs.<br />
• The need to ensure that there is a sufficient land supply to meet the requirement<br />
for affordable housing will continue to be a priority during the period of this<br />
SHIP. Since the last SHIP was prepared, a significant amount of work has been<br />
done to review the <strong>Council</strong>’s land holding in order to identify areas of land that<br />
have the potential to deliver new affordable housing – details are set out in<br />
Section 4 of this document.<br />
• There is a clear need to continue the twin-track approach to increasing the<br />
provision of new affordable housing in the <strong>Council</strong> area by both the <strong>Council</strong> and<br />
RSLs. New homes can only be delivered where the <strong>Council</strong> and its<br />
development partners work together to achieve agreed aims. Work continues to<br />
try to address the difficult issues which can sometime arise in the<br />
implementation of agreed planning policies where there is local opposition to<br />
new housing development.<br />
• New housing provision is underpinned by investment strategies that seek to<br />
improve the quality of the existing housing stock across all sectors.<br />
5
• The needs of those who have particular housing requirements are currently<br />
being assessed in partnership with the <strong>Council</strong>’s Social Work Services and<br />
those Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) who currently provide housing in the<br />
area for people with particular needs. There are specific issues in relation to the<br />
provision of housing for older people and for people with physical disabilities.<br />
• Most of the existing housing stock for older people was built in the 1970s and<br />
80s when housing expectations were quite different to what they are today.<br />
Social and public health policy is now to enable people with additional needs to<br />
be cared for in their own homes and the significant developments in recent<br />
years in assistive technology now makes this a more attractive option for many<br />
older people than moving to some form of specialist housing. This change will<br />
need to be reflected in the next LHS.<br />
• Although the majority of older people in the future may be enabled to continue to<br />
live in their current home, there will still be a need for specialist provision for<br />
those whose home cannot be made safe or comfortable for them and for those<br />
who prefer to live in accommodation in a group setting where they can benefit<br />
from additional security and social interaction with people of their own<br />
generation. Clearly, finding a new balance of housing provision for older people<br />
is an issue that will need to be explored in the coming year as the new LHS is<br />
developed. In this context, there will be a need to consider how well the existing<br />
housing stock for older people meets needs now and has the potential to meet<br />
changing needs in the future. It is anticipated that the 2012-17 SHIP will identify<br />
a requirement for an element of stock reconfiguration in respect of <strong>Housing</strong> with<br />
Care.<br />
• In 2009-10, the <strong>Council</strong> received £9.134m of funding from the Scottish<br />
Government’s core Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Programme (AHIP) which<br />
allowed the completion of 123 new affordable homes. A further 27 affordable<br />
homes were delivered through the Mortgage to Rent scheme (MTR) and the<br />
Open Market Shared Equity Pilot scheme (OMSE).<br />
• The <strong>Council</strong>’s core AHIP funding allocation for <strong>2010</strong>-11 is £5.341m which has,<br />
to date, allowed the completion of 90 new affordable homes. A further 26 new<br />
homes are currently under construction and will be completed by the end of this<br />
financial year.<br />
• The <strong>Council</strong> has completed 12 new affordable homes this year as part of the<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s New Build Programme and a further 60 homes are currently under<br />
construction.<br />
• A further 18 affordable homes have been delivered so far this year through the<br />
Mortgage to Rent scheme and the Open Market Shared Equity Pilot scheme.<br />
• The Scottish Government’s <strong>2010</strong>-11 unit approval target is 56 new affordable<br />
homes comprising projects in Bridge Street, Bonnybridge, Overton Crescent,<br />
Redding and Bellsdyke Road, Larbert.<br />
6
• This SHIP is based on a total core AHIP requirement of £22m over 5 years.<br />
This figure is derived from the <strong>2010</strong>-11 AHIP allocation of £5.341m with<br />
resource planning assumptions based on a 25 per cent reduction over the first<br />
four years of the 2011-2016 SHIP.<br />
• Allowing for the deduction of £1m required to deliver adaptations in RSL<br />
properties 1 over the 5 years of the SHIP, it is assumed that the residual AHIP<br />
resources available to deliver new affordable homes between 2011 and 2016<br />
will be around £21m but this figure may be cut depending on the level of savings<br />
that the Scottish Government requires to make from the AHIP.<br />
• Based on an average grant requirement of £70k per unit for new RSL properties<br />
for rent, £21m could deliver approximately 300 new social rented homes over<br />
the 5 year period of the SHIP. However, as the grant requirement for low cost<br />
home ownership initiatives is lower, more new homes could be built if some of<br />
the allocation is used for this purpose. This issue will be the subject of<br />
consultation in the development of priorities for the 2011-16 LHS.<br />
• A 12% allowance has been built into the programme to accommodate any<br />
slippage which might occur.<br />
• This SHIP includes 16 partnership projects, comprising 352 dwellings delivered<br />
by 7 RSL partners.<br />
• This SHIP also covers the <strong>Council</strong>’s New Build Programme which aims to<br />
provide 120 new affordable rented homes over the period of the SHIP, at an<br />
estimated total cost of £12.07m.<br />
• As well as built-in slippage to the main programme, the SHIP submission also<br />
includes a Shadow Programme of 15 potential projects comprising 346<br />
affordable homes which could be brought forward if additional funding becomes<br />
available.<br />
• Partnership work continues to address constraints that could impact on the<br />
successful delivery of the SHIP such as flood risks, infrastructure provision,<br />
contaminated land, access issues and so on.<br />
1<br />
Stage 3 funding is monies identified to assist with adaptation works to RSL properties<br />
7
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Purpose<br />
1.1 The purpose of this <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP) is to set out key<br />
investment priorities and the level of investment required to deliver them in relation<br />
to the provision of affordable housing in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area over the next five<br />
years, taking account of the housing needs identified through the Local <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Strategy (LHS) process. The programme is based upon meeting the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
strategic objectives, set out in the Single Outcome Agreement (SOA) 2009-11 and<br />
LHS 2004-09, of regenerating priority areas, redeveloping or refurbishing low<br />
demand stock and increasing the availability of a range of new affordable housing<br />
options. Whilst the SHIP focuses mainly on new housing provision by RSLs, it also<br />
takes account of the <strong>Council</strong>’s new house building programme as well as the<br />
current economic situation which means that there is little chance of the private<br />
house building industry making any significant contribution to the provision of<br />
affordable housing in the area in the immediate future.<br />
1.2 This SHIP sets out the resources required to deliver a local affordable housing<br />
programme taking account of the range of available funding streams which includes<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Association Grant (HAG) and funding for <strong>Council</strong> house new build (see<br />
Appendices 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d and 1e). In taking a strategic overview of potential<br />
development opportunities, the SHIP identifies deliverable housing projects for the<br />
coming five year period. In addition, a “shadow” programme has been developed<br />
to allow projects to be brought forward should additional funding become available.<br />
In doing this, the intention has been to prepare a realistic and deliverable plan<br />
which will provide a sound basis for continuing discussions with the <strong>Housing</strong> &<br />
Regeneration Directorate, RSLs and other partner agencies over the planning<br />
period.<br />
1.3 Projects that are currently on site or will be on site before 1 April 2011 are not<br />
included in the templates (Appendix 1a) but are shown in the 5 year SHIP<br />
Summary Programme (Appendix 1b) and the 5 year SHIP Financial Profile<br />
(Appendix 1c) to outline current grant commitments over the period of the SHIP.<br />
Sites that are in the future project category but are not anticipated to be on site<br />
before the end of the 5 year SHIP are also detailed in Appendices 1b, 1c and 1d.<br />
The “shadow” programme that can be brought forward if there is any slippage in the<br />
main programme, or if additional resources become available, is set out in<br />
Appendix 1d.<br />
Background - LHS 2004-09 Stock Strategy<br />
1.4 During the period of the 2004-09 LHS, the <strong>Council</strong> pursued a selective stock<br />
disposal strategy based on an assessment of stock conditions, investment<br />
requirements, housing demand, development potential and tenants’ views. This<br />
LHS strategy recognised that a concentration of low demand housing can have a<br />
serious blighting effect on communities and that redevelopment opportunities<br />
afforded by such circumstances allow for the provision of new housing which better<br />
meets modern needs and the aspirations of local people. The provision of new<br />
affordable housing has been one of several key outcomes of housing regeneration<br />
strategies in the <strong>Council</strong> area since the LHS 2004-09 was agreed (and<br />
subsequently extended by the Interim LHS Statement published in May <strong>2010</strong>) and<br />
is one of the main priorities contained within the <strong>Council</strong>’s strategic plans.<br />
9
1.5 Against the strategic background of the 2004-09 LHS and <strong>2010</strong> LHS Interim<br />
Statement, the projects which form the new development opportunities within this<br />
SHIP flow from the findings of local housing needs assessment work undertaken in<br />
2007. The positioning of individual projects within the 5 year programme is based<br />
on a balancing of the highest strategic priorities, available resources and<br />
deliverability. The methodology and criteria for prioritising projects is detailed in<br />
Section 6. The most deliverable projects are planned for the start of the 5 year<br />
programme whilst those projects which present the most constraints are placed<br />
further on in the programme to allow adequate time for them to be resolved or<br />
replaced with alternative projects in future SHIPs.<br />
1.6 The level of grant funding that is likely to be available over the period of this SHIP<br />
does mean that whilst some progress can be made on addressing the annual<br />
shortfall of 145 affordable homes across the <strong>Council</strong> area, it will not be possible to<br />
meet this shortfall in full. Given the current economic recession and the<br />
consequent downturn in the house building industry, there is little chance that<br />
private developers will be able to contribute significantly to the shortfall. This<br />
leaves the onus of meeting the need for affordable housing on the <strong>Council</strong> and its<br />
RSL partners, who will continue to explore initiatives to try to increase the supply<br />
and range of affordable housing options in the area.<br />
1.7 The National <strong>Housing</strong> Trust (NHT) initiative is a new concept which aims to<br />
increase the supply of affordable housing across Scotland and <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is<br />
one of twelve local authorities across Scotland which is participating in this scheme.<br />
The scheme uses local authorities’ prudential borrowing capacity to help fund new<br />
housing developments which will make housing let at mid-market rents available for<br />
between five and ten years during which time it is anticipated that the private<br />
housing market will recover sufficiently for developers to be able to sell the units.<br />
This housing option will not suit everyone but it may provide an additional choice for<br />
people who ultimately aspire to owning their own home but who cannot currently<br />
access mortgage finance for this. The procurement phase of the NHT is currently<br />
underway and it is hoped that up to 100 new homes can be provided in the <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> area.<br />
10
2. MOVING FORWARD – THE LHS FRAMEWORK<br />
2.1 This SHIP is prepared within an overall framework for the development of the next<br />
Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy which is set out in Appendices 2a and 2b. This framework<br />
has developed from discussions with RSLs and other stakeholders during the past<br />
year.<br />
2.2 The new framework means that the development of the SHIP is overseen by the<br />
multi-agency <strong>Housing</strong> Need, Demand and Supply Executive (HND&S) Group which<br />
includes RSL and Scottish Government <strong>Housing</strong> and Regeneration Division<br />
representatives. The starting point for this group’s work is the Newhaven Research<br />
(2007) 2 which identified the local market area and its sub markets and quantified<br />
the requirement for affordable housing. An update of the data supporting the<br />
definition of the housing market area has been carried out and has been<br />
considered by the Executive Group. Local housing needs assessments at sub<br />
market level using the methodology recommended by Newhaven has been carried<br />
out to inform this SHIP. In future years the SHIP will be based upon the needs<br />
assessment that will underpin the next LHS.<br />
2.3 Assessing the need for affordable housing involves ongoing close joint working<br />
between housing staff and planning colleagues in the <strong>Council</strong>’s Development<br />
Services, <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Environment Unit. A key output has been the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy which is set out in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong>, albeit<br />
this is now under review (see item 4.5).<br />
2.4 Scottish Government guidance 3 issued in 2008 requires there to be greater<br />
integration between Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategies and Local Development <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />
(LDPs). A <strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment (HNDA) should underpin both<br />
and provide the key evidence base upon which housing supply targets are defined<br />
in the LHS and land release decisions are made within the LDP. As part of this<br />
integration the LHS should be submitted at the same time as the LDP Main Issues<br />
Report and for <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> the target date for completion of these two pieces of<br />
work is 2011.<br />
2.5 Work continues on the assessment of housing needs for people who have<br />
particular housing requirements. Further detail is provided in Section 3.<br />
2.6 In order to have a clear link between the 2004-09 LHS and the next full LHS which<br />
will cover the period 2011-16, an interim LHS Statement was prepared and agreed<br />
by the <strong>Council</strong> in May <strong>2010</strong>. The Statement aims to provide a bridge between the<br />
two planning periods so that there is a clear and logical progression between past<br />
and future priorities.<br />
2 Newhaven Research (2007)<br />
3 Scottish Government LHS Guidance (2008)<br />
11
The Wider Context – National Priorities, the Concordat and SOAs<br />
2.7 As noted above, the framework for the preparation of the next LHS flows from the<br />
LHS guidance issued in 2008 which sets the LHS in the context of national policies<br />
and the new relationship between central and local government referred to as the<br />
“Concordat”. Central to this new relationship has been the creation of Single<br />
Outcome Agreements (SOAs), which indicate how national policies will be delivered<br />
in each local authority area.<br />
2.8 A SOA for the period 2009-2011 has been developed and agreed by the <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Community <strong>Plan</strong>ning Partnership. The Vision set out in the SOA is that:<br />
• The legacy of our past and the potential of our future are protected,<br />
• Our area is at the centre of Scotland,<br />
• Our future is as one of the most culturally diverse and distinct areas in<br />
Scotland,<br />
• Our future has investment in jobs, learning, homes and leisure for all,<br />
• Our area is “the place to be” in the third Millennium.<br />
Partnership<br />
2.9 Partnership working is at the heart not only of the SOA but also of the development<br />
of both the LHS and the SHIP. Key partners in these processes include other<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Services, the Scottish Government, RSLs, developers and a wide range of<br />
other public sector agencies.<br />
2.10 The <strong>Falkirk</strong> SHIP 2008 indicated that the <strong>Council</strong> was reviewing partnership<br />
processes as part of work to take forward the next LHS. As noted earlier, Appendix<br />
2a indicates the framework for partnership working that will underpin the<br />
development of the next Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy whilst Appendix 2b demonstrates<br />
the extent of partnership working involved at all levels in the process of preparing<br />
the next LHS.<br />
2.11 Following discussions with RSLs it was agreed that the RSL Forum, which is<br />
chaired and hosted by RSLs, would have an important role to play in discussing<br />
strategic issues such as the SHIP and how it fits with wider LHS priorities. The<br />
Forum has equal status in the LHS framework with the LHS Steering Group and<br />
has a direct link into the strategic community planning process through the<br />
Improving Our Neighbourhoods Group.<br />
12
2.12 The RSL Forum meets quarterly and offers the opportunity for open discussions<br />
between the <strong>Council</strong> and all its RSL partners on strategic issues that feed in to the<br />
LHS process. At a more operational level there are strong, well-established liaison<br />
arrangements between RSL development staff and the <strong>Council</strong> on specific projects<br />
with regular meetings being held between the <strong>Council</strong>’s development partnership<br />
officers and RSL development staff. The diagram below illustrates the integrated<br />
nature of the relationship between the <strong>Council</strong>, RSL partners and the Scottish<br />
Government <strong>Housing</strong> and Regeneration Directorate where all three have to work<br />
co-operatively if both national and local housing objectives are to be met.<br />
The <strong>Falkirk</strong> SOA<br />
Local Authority Scottish<br />
Government<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> &<br />
Regeneration<br />
Directorate<br />
RSL<br />
Development<br />
Partners/<br />
Private<br />
Developers<br />
2.13 The SOA takes account of the demographic and economic factors that influence<br />
housing need and demand in the <strong>Council</strong> area and drives and underpins the Local<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Strategy by identifying clear strategic housing outcomes. The outcomes<br />
and indicators identified in the SOA relating to housing and support issues will<br />
effectively form a core set of outcomes and indicators within the next Local <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Strategy. The following diagram indicates the key influences on the LHS process.<br />
Single<br />
Outcome<br />
Agreement<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Community<br />
<strong>Plan</strong><br />
Corporate <strong>Plan</strong><br />
LHS/Local Development <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Needs + Demands Assessment<br />
(including Homelessness)/<br />
SHIP/Private Sector Strategy/<br />
Empty Homes Strategy/Standard Delivery <strong>Plan</strong>/<br />
Home Energy/Fuel Poverty/<br />
Supporting People/<strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit<br />
Alignment between the Single Outcome Agreement and Local <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Strategy Outcomes<br />
13
2.14 The LHS is expected to play an important part in delivering the government’s aim of<br />
increasing sustainable economic growth, as well as contributing significantly to a<br />
number of the fifteen national outcomes. The LHS guidance notes that the<br />
following national outcomes have specific relevance to Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategies:<br />
• National Outcome 7, ‘We have tackled the significant inequalities in Scottish<br />
society’.<br />
• National Outcome 10, ‘We live in well designed, sustainable places where<br />
we are able to access the amenities and services we need’.<br />
2.15 The 2009-2011 <strong>Falkirk</strong> SOA notes recent achievements in relation to both these<br />
national outcomes. Within the <strong>Falkirk</strong> SOA, National Outcome 10 has been<br />
expressed in terms of four local housing outcomes and shows how they are linked<br />
to other key strategic documents/priorities/outcomes:<br />
• Ensure our housing continues to meet the needs of people who live and may<br />
wish to live in our area (Community <strong>Plan</strong>).<br />
• Increase pride and satisfaction with their local community (Fairer Scotland<br />
Fund).<br />
• Ensure the provision of a range of affordable housing options which meet the<br />
needs of local people, including those with specific needs (Local <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Strategy 04-09).<br />
• Improve and maintain the <strong>Council</strong>’s core housing stock (Local <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Strategy 04-09).<br />
2.16 These SOA outcomes highlight the close links between housing need, the physical<br />
condition of the housing stock and how people feel about their environment and<br />
local community. The projects outlined in this SHIP seek in some way to achieve<br />
all of the above SOA outcomes.<br />
2.17 Table 1 shows how high level national outcomes link through the various stages of<br />
the planning process into local objectives.<br />
14
Table 1: <strong>Strategic</strong> Priorities<br />
Single<br />
Agreement<br />
Outcome <strong>Strategic</strong> Community <strong>Plan</strong> LHS 2004-09<br />
National Outcome 7 Theme Priorities <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3<br />
We have tackled the Regenerating Ensure the provision of good To prepare housing<br />
To improve areas where there are high<br />
significant inequalities in our<br />
quality and affordable housing development strategies, which investment needs and/or lack of housing<br />
Scottish society<br />
communities to meet the needs of current meet local priority needs demand through regeneration activity,<br />
and future residents and to<br />
including partnership working and tenure<br />
improve access to permanent<br />
housing for homeless people<br />
diversification<br />
National Objective 10 and other vulnerable groups.<br />
Objective 4<br />
We live in well designed,<br />
To create a supply of affordable rented or low<br />
sustainable places<br />
cost home ownership options in partnership<br />
where we are able to<br />
with local people, <strong>Housing</strong> & Regeneration<br />
access the amenities<br />
Directorate, Registered Social Landlords<br />
and services we need.<br />
(RSLs) and private developers<br />
15<br />
Objective 6<br />
To maximise external funding opportunities to<br />
implement housing regeneration objectives<br />
LHS 2004-09<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
To provide local people with a To ensure an adequate supply of affordable<br />
range of affordable housing housing options for all members of the<br />
options, including those who<br />
have specific housing needs<br />
community<br />
LHS 2004-09<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5<br />
To support vulnerable people<br />
in their homes<br />
Objective 15<br />
To increase the supply of purpose-built<br />
housing for people with special needs and<br />
extend the range of housing support systems
Equalities<br />
2.18 It is vital that the LHS and SHIP take full account of the housing needs of all<br />
members of the community and refer back to National Outcome 7 “We have<br />
tackled the significant inequalities in Scottish society”. In this context, the <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
SOA has identified two specific housing indicators, both related to homelessness.<br />
The national outcomes also underpin the <strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment<br />
which must take account of the different communities and households which make<br />
up the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area.<br />
2.19 Local housing needs assessments (HNAs) are carried out annually at sub area<br />
level and provided to RSLs to inform the partnership development programme.<br />
Each sub area local HNA makes recommendations in relation to size and type of<br />
property (mainstream, special needs) and details the groups to whom the new<br />
properties should be advertised. In order to make such recommendations the<br />
local HNAs draw on the 2007 Newhaven research and updated analysis of <strong>Council</strong><br />
waiting list, house sales and private rented sector rents. They also consider<br />
relevant issues relating to special needs housing and have taken account of the<br />
ODS 4 research into the housing needs of minority ethnic communities.<br />
2.20 The SHIP 2008 Equalities Impact Assessment identified a gap in respect of<br />
monitoring the allocations made by RSLs to their new build properties in line with<br />
the equalities strands of race, disability and age. (It was not deemed<br />
proportionate, relevant or legitimate to collect data on gender/gender identity,<br />
sexual orientation and faith/religion). In order to address this information gap, it<br />
was decided to monitor allocation complaints by all six equalities strands but,<br />
unfortunately, this part of the annual proforma which RSLs operating in the <strong>Council</strong><br />
area are asked to submit has not been completed by a number of them. The<br />
RSLs have, however, provided some equalities information on the applicants on<br />
their waiting list (Appendix 3a).<br />
2.21 Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association, Paragon <strong>Housing</strong> Association and Weslo <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Management were the only RSLs with unit completions in 2009-<strong>2010</strong> and<br />
Appendix 3b: Equalities information for new build lets by housing association<br />
2009-<strong>2010</strong> provides details of these lets. The Equalities Impact Assessment is<br />
provided at Appendix 3c.<br />
2.22 It is anticipated that current work on assessing the housing requirements of people<br />
with particular needs will indicate that a combination of new build, adaptations and<br />
service redesign will be required to meet needs over the coming decade. Pending<br />
the completion of this work, a pragmatic approach has been taken in developing<br />
this SHIP: all ground floor properties will be built to varying needs standard and,<br />
where appropriate, the opportunity is taken to accommodate within the design brief<br />
the needs of identified individuals on the housing waiting lists whose housing<br />
requirements cannot be met in another way.<br />
4<br />
ODS (2006) Assessing the <strong>Housing</strong> Needs of Minority Ethnic Communities in <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
16
LHS 2004-09 Outcomes: Update<br />
2.23 In 2007/08 a formal monitoring and evaluation of the LHS 2004-09 was carried out.<br />
The exercise provided useful information in relation to prioritising and categorising<br />
objectives in the light of policy and legislative changes and in identifying potential<br />
issues to be considered in the next LHS.<br />
2.24 The following table indicates the relevant LHS objectives and actions relating to<br />
the SHIP and progress to date. These objectives are considered to be high priority<br />
for ongoing action.<br />
Table 2: LHS Objectives and Actions<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3 Action 13 Progress<br />
To prepare housing<br />
development strategies,<br />
which meet local priority<br />
needs<br />
To improve areas where<br />
there are high investment<br />
needs and/or lack of housing<br />
demand through<br />
regeneration activity,<br />
including partnership working<br />
and tenure diversification<br />
Implement investment /<br />
development strategies<br />
for Craigleith Road,<br />
Wood Street, Corbiehall,<br />
Church Walk, Lomond<br />
Drive, Carron Road<br />
Objective 4 Action 16 Progress<br />
To create a supply of<br />
affordable rented or low cost<br />
home ownership options in<br />
partnership with local people,<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> & Regeneration<br />
Directorate, Registered<br />
Social Landlords (RSLs) and<br />
private developers<br />
Establish targets for the<br />
provision of affordable<br />
and special needs<br />
dwellings<br />
Ongoing. Following demolition of<br />
former low demand <strong>Council</strong> flats<br />
105 new homes have been built<br />
at Craigleith Road and Wood<br />
Street, Grangemouth. 32 units at<br />
Lomond Drive were completed in<br />
2009-10. Proposals for<br />
Corbiehall and Church Walk<br />
being taken forward in context of<br />
town centres regeneration<br />
strategy. Partial demolition has<br />
taken place at Carron Road to<br />
facilitate the <strong>Council</strong>’s new build<br />
programme.<br />
Ongoing. Previously reported in<br />
the Partnership Programme<br />
Appendix to the LHS Update but<br />
now relates to SHIP proformas<br />
table 1B.<br />
Objective 6 Action 33 Progress<br />
To maximise external Develop housing Ongoing. As above.<br />
funding opportunities to partnership programme<br />
implement housing<br />
with <strong>Housing</strong> &<br />
regeneration objectives Regeneration<br />
Directorate, RSLs and<br />
private sector<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8 Action 37 Progress<br />
To provide local people<br />
with a range of<br />
affordable housing<br />
options, including those<br />
who have specific<br />
housing needs<br />
To ensure an adequate<br />
supply of affordable housing<br />
options for all members of<br />
the community<br />
Carry out ongoing<br />
assessment of housing<br />
needs and local housing<br />
market analysis<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15 Action 57 Progress<br />
To support vulnerable<br />
people in their homes<br />
To increase the supply of<br />
purpose-built housing for<br />
people with special needs<br />
and extend the range of<br />
housing support systems<br />
17<br />
Build new<br />
Specialist/Wheelchair<br />
housing<br />
Completed. This related to the<br />
affordable housing needs<br />
assessment work carried out in<br />
2007 which informed the need<br />
for a revised Affordable <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Policy. This is now being<br />
updated in accordance with the<br />
new HNDA guidance and will<br />
inform the housing supply targets<br />
that will be set in the 2011-16<br />
LHS.<br />
Ongoing. This relates to<br />
increasing the supply of special<br />
needs housing which links to the<br />
<strong>Council</strong> new build programme.<br />
33 new homes have been built to<br />
wheelchair accessible standards<br />
since 2004.
3. HOUSING NEED, DEMAND AND SUPPLY<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Market Areas<br />
3.1 The first stage of a <strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment (HNDA) is to identify<br />
the housing market area. The SHIP 2008 indicated the first steps for <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong>:<br />
• Consideration of the Newhaven Research (2007),<br />
• Updating above analysis in relation to the HNDA guidance,<br />
• Consultation with other <strong>Council</strong>s,<br />
• Setting up and discussing updated analysis with the <strong>Housing</strong> Need,<br />
Demand and Supply (HND&S) Executive Group.<br />
3.2 The Newhaven Research (2007) was carried out to provide a critical but<br />
independent review of in-house research into local housing need and provide<br />
advice on appropriate geographies to be used for planning purposes. It identified<br />
the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area as a self-contained housing market, albeit one that was<br />
more open to influence from the wider Edinburgh and other neighbouring housing<br />
markets.<br />
3.3 A housing market study was carried out in November 2009 using the HNDA<br />
guidance to update some of the analysis carried out by Newhaven. This work<br />
(Identifying the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Market) again confirmed that the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
area remains a self-contained housing market with links to the wider Edinburgh<br />
market and, to a lesser extent, other neighbouring local authority areas.<br />
3.4 The November 2009 work used the sub areas defined by Newhaven:<br />
• Bo’ness,<br />
• Denny Bonnybridge,<br />
• Grangemouth,<br />
• Polmont Rural South,<br />
• Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> (<strong>Falkirk</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong> area and Larbert/Stenhousemuir/Rural<br />
North).<br />
3.5 A Forth Valley cross-border group was convened in July 2009 by the Scottish<br />
Government to discuss issues relevant to the HNDA and involved <strong>Falkirk</strong>, Stirling<br />
and Clackmannanshire <strong>Council</strong>s. This group also discussed references in the<br />
SHIP guidance to cross-border liaison and agreed to share information including<br />
housing market studies. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> subsequently circulated its 2009 housing<br />
market study (Identifying the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Market) to Stirling and<br />
Clackmannanshire <strong>Council</strong>s.<br />
3.6 The <strong>Falkirk</strong> HND&S Executive Group involves external representatives from<br />
amongst others, Homes for Scotland and the Scottish Association of Landlords.<br />
This Executive Group continues to oversee the process of finalising the HNDA for<br />
the LHS 2011-16. At its most recent meeting on 23 September <strong>2010</strong> the group<br />
noted progress on the HNDA and the positive feedback from the Scottish<br />
Government’s Centre for <strong>Housing</strong> Market Analysis (CHMA) on the analysis carried<br />
out to date which is considered to form a firm foundation for the next LHS.<br />
19
<strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment<br />
3.7 For the purpose of this year’s SHIP, the Newhaven Report (2007) remains the<br />
most up to date source of information in relation to housing need. This report<br />
indicated that the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area has an annual average shortfall of 145<br />
affordable units over the 10 years to 2016. The table below indicates the<br />
shortfall/surpluses identified by Newhaven by sub market area and how they<br />
should be prioritised for future investment.<br />
Table 3: 10 year annual average shortfall/surplus<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Needs Assessment Areas<br />
Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> (Larbert/ Stenhousemuir &<br />
Rural North, <strong>Falkirk</strong>)<br />
Annual Average<br />
Shortfall (-)/<br />
Surplus (+) of<br />
Affordable<br />
<strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong><br />
Priorities<br />
-73 1<br />
Larbert/ Stenhousemuir & Rural North -93 1a<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> +19 1b<br />
Polmont & Rural South -67 2<br />
Denny & Bonnybridge -42 3<br />
Bo’ness -19 4<br />
Grangemouth +56 5<br />
Total -145<br />
Source: Newhaven 2009 (subject to rounding)<br />
3.8 The Newhaven Research (2007) indicates that the Larbert/Stenhousemuir/Rural<br />
North areas have a chronic shortfall of affordable housing and there may be a<br />
case for providing options for people to meet their housing needs in other areas.<br />
3.9 Newhaven noted that<br />
“Although there is likely to be a policy preference to seek to address housing<br />
needs in the local area in which it first appears, it should be borne in mind that<br />
some households resolve their requirement for housing by moving to areas they<br />
can afford. As such there may be a case for considering ways to direct demand<br />
for social rented housing within the Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> area to the <strong>Falkirk</strong> sub area. In<br />
the longer term, there may also be a case of seeking to encourage prospective<br />
social rented tenants to consider accommodation in Grangemouth over the coming<br />
10 years.” 5<br />
3.10 The type and size of properties that people are looking for may be available in<br />
other areas therefore it is important to enable people in housing need to have the<br />
choice to consider these options. This SHIP therefore outlines new build options<br />
in <strong>Falkirk</strong> which may be of interest to people from Stenhousemuir/Larbert/Rural<br />
North. As noted earlier, the <strong>Council</strong> is currently developing a “<strong>Housing</strong> Options”<br />
approach to meeting local housing need and a new, choice-based, housing<br />
allocations policy which sets clear priorities based on an assessment of housing<br />
need (and offers applicants a significant degree of choice in how they seek to<br />
meet their need) was implemented in January <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
5<br />
Newhaven 2007 <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Needs<br />
20
3.11 Under the new arrangements all applicants are able to see exactly what is<br />
available for social rent in the area and it is anticipated that this will result in<br />
applicants recognising that they may need to cross local boundaries in order to be<br />
able to obtain the type of property that meets their housing needs/aspirations<br />
within a reasonable timescale. Evidence from the first nine months of the new<br />
arrangements suggests that around a third of housing applicants are prepared to<br />
move across perceived local boundaries in order to meet their housing need.<br />
3.12 The development of the “housing options” approach to meeting housing need is a<br />
key part of the Homelessness Strategy approved in December 2008. This<br />
Strategy and the new Allocations Policy recognise that demand for affordable<br />
rented housing outstrips supply in the area and seeks to give those in housing<br />
need the help and information they need to allow them to make reasoned choices.<br />
Nevertheless, increasing the supply of new homes is likely to be the only way in<br />
which the housing needs of a growing population is going to be met in the longer<br />
term and this is the key issue for this SHIP.<br />
3.13 The Newhaven Research (2007) indicates that there is currently an oversupply of<br />
affordable accommodation in Grangemouth. However, the completion of new<br />
build housing in the town over the past year by Link and Paragon <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Associations at Wood Street and Craigleith Road as part of the housing<br />
regeneration programme indicates that it is too simplistic to develop future housing<br />
strategies solely on the basis of statistical analysis. The development of 105 new<br />
homes for rent and low cost home ownership at Wood Street and Craigleith Road<br />
resulted in over 100 bids for each property available for let. This shows that where<br />
the housing product on offer is one which people want, a statistical over-supply<br />
issue can easily become an under-supply.<br />
3.14 This experience suggests that there is likely to be a demand for further stock<br />
renewal/regeneration in Grangemouth but this is hindered by the fact that the<br />
town is at the centre of Scotland’s petro-chemical industries and as such is subject<br />
to rigorous planning and health and safety constraints. Nevertheless, it is likely<br />
that some form of stock reconfiguration in the town will be needed in the coming<br />
years if it is to continue to play an important role as a residential area that<br />
contributes to the overall supply of housing in the <strong>Council</strong> area and this is an issue<br />
that will need to be considered in the next LHS taking account of the funding that<br />
may be required to achieve this.<br />
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy in the Context of the Recession<br />
3.15 The current Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy (AHP) which is set out in the Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
which will be formally adopted by the <strong>Council</strong> by the end of <strong>2010</strong> is based on an<br />
analysis of housing needs that was undertaken in-house and was then confirmed<br />
by analysis undertaken in 2007 by Newhaven Research. The Newhaven<br />
Research confirmed that the AHP was robust and that housing needs analysis did<br />
not support more onerous AHP site threshold figures. Although the AHP was<br />
initially challenged at the recent Local <strong>Plan</strong> Inquiry, the objections were dropped<br />
and Supplementary <strong>Plan</strong>ning Guidance for the AHP has now been published.<br />
However, a review of the AHP is currently in progress taking account of more<br />
recent analysis of housing needs in the context of the HNDA and the preparation<br />
of the Local Development <strong>Plan</strong> (LDP) Main Issues Report which will be published<br />
in 2011 – (see paragraph 4.4) for more details.<br />
21
3.16 In terms of new build completions in respect of private sector housing, the position<br />
in <strong>Falkirk</strong> is consistent with that across the rest of Scotland.<br />
Figure A<br />
Number of sales<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Number of new build sales Jan-Dec 2004-2009<br />
in <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Source: Scottish Government LHS data pack<br />
3.17 Whilst it remains difficult to predict when the situation will return to ‘normal’, there<br />
is a general consensus that it is likely to be many years before the building<br />
industry is delivering the amount of new housing that it was doing in the first seven<br />
or eight years of the century. The economic picture described last year has<br />
changed little. Key issues remain:<br />
Year<br />
• Significant slowdown in the housing market,<br />
• Completed new homes lying empty,<br />
• Reduction in new build output,<br />
• Scottish Government’s house building targets are not being met,<br />
• Static house prices,<br />
• Restricted access to mortgage products and loans,<br />
• Increase in mortgage defaults,<br />
• Increase in homelessness,<br />
• Job losses within the building sector and support services,<br />
• Loss of skills in the longer term which could affect future building capacity,<br />
• Reduced developer contributions (“<strong>Plan</strong>ning Gain”) affecting community<br />
infrastructure.<br />
3.18 In some local authority areas the credit crunch has led to dramatic falls in house<br />
prices, but Figure B overleaf indicates that in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area, house<br />
prices have actually largely remained fairly static – both new build and resale<br />
prices have fallen slightly with new build taking a sharper descent and coming<br />
closer to the 2004 price equivalent. Figure C overleaf, shows that the key issue<br />
locally is not so much the prices of houses but rather the relationship between<br />
house prices and income and the ability of people on low to moderate incomes to<br />
obtain mortgages.<br />
22
Figure B<br />
Figure C<br />
250,000<br />
200,000<br />
150,000<br />
100,000<br />
50,000<br />
0<br />
Mean average house prices in <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ar<br />
2004-2009<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Source: Scottish Government LHS data pack<br />
5<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Lower Quartile House Prices and Earnings<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Source: Scottish Government <strong>Plan</strong>ning Statistics<br />
23<br />
ea<br />
New Build<br />
Resales<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> FT Earner/ 1<br />
bedroom<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> FT & PT Earner/<br />
Medium properties<br />
Scotland - FT Earner/ 1<br />
Bedroom<br />
Scotland - FT&PT<br />
Earner/Medium Properties<br />
3.19 It is worth noting that whilst homelessness presentations dropped by 8% over<br />
2009/10 within the <strong>Council</strong> area, 109 households approached the homelessness<br />
service during 2009/10 as a result of mortgage default – this is an increase of 5%<br />
over the previous year. Homelessness resulting from financial difficulties<br />
amounted to 9% of total applications in 2009-10. This figure has decreased by 2%<br />
since 2008-09 and is likely to be the result of more effective assistance given to<br />
people who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial problems, including<br />
the Mortgage to Rent scheme. It is anticipated that this figure will continue to<br />
reduce as homelessness prevention measures become more embedded in the<br />
practices of the <strong>Council</strong> and its partner landlord organisations and as banks and<br />
other mortgage lenders are required to do more to assist people who are<br />
experiencing difficulty in managing their housing costs.
3.20 Homeless presentations in the <strong>Council</strong> area in <strong>2010</strong>/11 continue to be high and it<br />
will be vital to monitor how effectively the new Homelessness Strategy 2008-13<br />
addresses the Scottish Government’s 2012 homelessness target that by 2012<br />
everyone who is not intentionally homeless will have a right to settled<br />
accommodation. This target has been expressed in a local Vision, set out in the<br />
Homelessness Strategy “by 2012 no one in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area need be<br />
homeless” and a detailed action plan is being implemented which focuses on three<br />
key priorities: Prevention, Accommodation and Support. A major element of this<br />
Vision is the implementation of the “housing options approach” alongside the<br />
choice-based lettings scheme noted above, alongside measures to improve<br />
access to private rented accommodation in the area.<br />
3.21 Over time it is intended that there will be a sufficient range of housing options to<br />
meet the needs of local people and it is clear that in a time of limited resources for<br />
building new homes will be increasingly important to make the most effective use<br />
of all the available housing stock. Stakeholders’ views on how this can be<br />
achieved will be a major area for consideration in the next LHS.<br />
Figure D<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
Source: <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> housing management system<br />
Mortgage to Rent Scheme<br />
0<br />
1940<br />
Homeless presentations 2005-<strong>2010</strong><br />
1955<br />
3.22 Of the 71 applications to the Mortgage to Rent scheme since its introduction in<br />
2003, 32 dwellings in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area have been purchased by local RSLs<br />
facilitated through £1.71m of grant subsidy. Of the total transactions completed,<br />
23% were purchased in 2009/10 indicating that more people are now having<br />
recourse to the Scheme in order to solve their housing crisis. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
agreed to participate in the scheme in June 2009, purchased its first property in<br />
October 2009 and has now bought a further 7 properties since then. There<br />
continues to be a steady flow of applications and the number of acquisitions is<br />
therefore likely to increase. The total amount of Government grant received in<br />
respect of these properties amounts to £244,000, with the <strong>Council</strong>’s contribution<br />
being £315,000.<br />
24<br />
2434<br />
2736<br />
2521<br />
2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-<strong>2010</strong>
<strong>Housing</strong> for People with Particular Needs<br />
3.23 Over the past year detailed work has been undertaken in respect of the need for<br />
specialist accommodation for people with particular needs. This has included<br />
analysis of secondary data such as General Registers Office (GRO) household<br />
projections, the <strong>Council</strong> and RSL housing management systems, the Social Work<br />
Information System (SWIS), the Local House Condition Survey (LHCS) and<br />
discussions with Social Work colleagues.<br />
Older People<br />
3.24 The current population of people aged 60 and over is around 33,000 people. Men<br />
and women are equally represented in the older population until age 75 when the<br />
proportion of women increases. In terms of the overall population of older people<br />
there is projected to be a 29% increase in the 75+ age group over the period<br />
2008-2018 and a 97% increase in this group over the period 2008-2033. Given<br />
the correlation between old age and disability, this increase has important<br />
implications for care and support services as well as the provision of suitable<br />
property types.<br />
3.25 At present, a range of accommodation options are available locally for older<br />
people ranging from <strong>Housing</strong> with Care Level 1 (previously called Very Sheltered<br />
<strong>Housing</strong>) to amenity housing which comprises small flats or bungalows which have<br />
generally been let to older people. In addition, <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> manages 13 multistorey<br />
tower blocks, 2 of which offer <strong>Housing</strong> with Care Level 2 (previously called<br />
sheltered housing) with the remaining 11 blocks providing general needs housing.<br />
The 11 mainstream blocks account for 806 units which provide a desirable<br />
housing option for some older people.<br />
3.26 A key issue that will require to be addressed in the new LHS is that much of the<br />
stock of housing designed for older people no longer meets the needs and<br />
aspirations of that client group and, given the population projections outlined<br />
above, it is now necessary for the next LHS to set out a clear strategy for meeting<br />
the housing needs of this ageing population. A number of factors have contributed<br />
to the current situation:<br />
• Specialist “sheltered” housing built in the 1970s and 80s is often small in<br />
comparison with what people expect today. There is some evidence that<br />
older women will not consider bedsit accommodation when it becomes<br />
available and even properties with a separate bedroom are often<br />
considered to be too small – older people nowadays often want to have a<br />
spare room for family and friends to stay over.<br />
• Much of the 1970s and 80s sheltered housing stock was built over two<br />
storeys without a lift. This is increasingly seen as a barrier to access for<br />
older people today and significant capital investment is now required if this<br />
accommodation is to provide a future housing option for older people. It<br />
seems likely that some reconfiguration or service redesign will be required<br />
in the coming years.<br />
25
• Many older people who might previously have moved from their family<br />
home to smaller accommodation as they became older have now bought<br />
their home from the local authority or RSL and wish to remain there so that<br />
they have an asset to leave to their children. In addition, if they are<br />
mortgage free, it is cheaper to stay where they are than to rent alternative<br />
accommodation.<br />
• National health and social care policy has moved towards enabling people<br />
to live in their own home wherever possible by means of adaptations to the<br />
property and the provision of both telecare and support services.<br />
3.27 Over the past year, analysis of expressed demand for <strong>Housing</strong> with Care has<br />
indicated that there are around 200 people on a combination of <strong>Council</strong> and RSL<br />
waiting lists. As noted above, some of the accommodation no longer meets<br />
modern expectations and there is now a need to consider whether<br />
reconfiguration/refurbishment is a viable option or if some units need to either be<br />
demolished to provide a development site for housing that better meets current<br />
needs or used to meet the needs of other groups in the population. Work is<br />
currently underway to consider how the <strong>Council</strong>’s own housing stock can best<br />
meet present day and future needs so that a clear development programme can<br />
be prepared in the context of the next LHS and it is planned to hold workshops<br />
with RSL partners in November <strong>2010</strong> to agree how a similar exercise can be<br />
undertaken for the RSL stock of housing for older people.<br />
3.28 As a result of the work done over the past year it has become clear that there is a<br />
need for better publicity about the range of housing options available for older<br />
people and that the process of applying for specialist housing would be simplified if<br />
there was a local Common <strong>Housing</strong> Register (CHR). In the absence of a CHR<br />
there has been a need to manually compare the <strong>Council</strong> and RSL waiting lists to<br />
eliminate double counting and in doing this it has become evident that most older<br />
people are not aware of the wider housing options that exist across the <strong>Council</strong><br />
area and therefore there is a possibility that they miss out on opportunities to meet<br />
their housing need. The development of a CHR and an increased awareness<br />
about local housing options may help some older people to make the right housing<br />
choices at the right time for them.<br />
3.29 Given the fact that the population is ageing, there is a clear need to ensure that<br />
new general needs housing is built so that it can be adapted as the occupants’<br />
needs change over the coming years. All of the <strong>Council</strong>’s new build properties<br />
and all RSL developments are built to <strong>Housing</strong> for Varying Needs Standards and<br />
this should assist to meet the needs of people as they age or develop disabilities<br />
without them having to move home.<br />
Physical Disabilities<br />
3.30 The correlation between old age and physical disability/sensory impairment was<br />
noted above but there will always be a proportion of the younger population that<br />
requires housing that is purpose-built or adapted to meet their needs. Using data<br />
from a range of sources including the 2009 Local House Condition Survey (LHCS),<br />
the Social Work Information System (SWIS) and <strong>Council</strong> and RSL waiting lists, it is<br />
estimated that around 100 people with physical disabilities require alternative<br />
housing.<br />
26
3.31 The requirement for any new socially rented properties to be built to <strong>Housing</strong> for<br />
Varying Needs Standards will go some way to addressing the need for housing for<br />
people with physical disabilities over time but there will always be a small number<br />
of people who need bespoke housing solutions that go beyond level access and<br />
minor adaptations. Families will often need accommodation specially designed for<br />
a child or young person with severe disabilities and there is a recognised need for<br />
this kind of provision for some children who are in foster care placements. To<br />
address the need for personalised housing provision for people with severe<br />
disabilities it is proposed that the new LHS will set a target percentage for such<br />
provision in all new developments for rent/low cost home ownership provided by<br />
either the <strong>Council</strong> or its RSL partners. Over the coming year there will be<br />
consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, including those groups who<br />
represent the views of people with disabilities, to ascertain what an appropriate<br />
target should be. The needs of families who have children with disabilities will be<br />
discussed with Social Work colleagues.<br />
3.32 However, many people with disabilities will wish to stay where they are and seek<br />
to have their home adapted to meet their needs. The 2009 LHCS estimated that<br />
7% of households considered that they had an illness or disability that would<br />
require them to adapt their homes. Taking account of these findings, a Scheme of<br />
Assistance has now been approved in accordance with the requirements of the<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> (Scotland) Act 2009. This makes provision for owners and tenants in the<br />
private rented sector to access grants to adapt or extend their homes to meet their<br />
assessed needs. For tenants in social rented housing, landlords work in<br />
partnership with Social Work Services to try to adapt a person’s home or, where<br />
this is not possible, to facilitate a move to more suitable accommodation.<br />
Learning Disabilities<br />
3.33 Social Work colleagues have highlighted a need to consider the housing needs of<br />
people with learning disabilities, in particular those who have elderly carers. The<br />
Scottish Consortium for Learning Disabilities estimates that around 724 adults in<br />
the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area have learning disabilities, whilst SWIS indicates that<br />
around 150 people were assessed as having a learning disability in 2008-09, of<br />
whom 13 were in unsuitable accommodation. In some cases, people with a<br />
learning disability may also be elderly and/or suffer from physical disabilities and<br />
the need for purpose-built housing for these people will overlap with the two<br />
categories noted above but it is likely that general needs housing with the<br />
provision of appropriate care and support packages will meet the needs of the<br />
majority of people with learning disabilities.<br />
3.34 At the moment, there are 248 units in 98 developments that aim to provide<br />
accommodation and specialist support for people who need it. Discussions are<br />
currently underway with Social Work Services to ascertain whether there is a need<br />
for further specialist provision for this client group and, if this is the case, an<br />
appropriate target will be set in the next LHS. Information from Social Work<br />
indicates that around a third of the housing support budget - £3,889,550 - assists<br />
152 people with learning disabilities.<br />
27
Mental Health<br />
3.35 In terms of people with mental health problems, the majority live in general needs<br />
housing although some may need support to do so. Information from Health and<br />
Wellbeing profile 2008 indicated over 1000 psychiatric inpatients from <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> area over the course of a year. However it is important to note that this<br />
does not indicate a housing need. In 2008, Supporting People returns to the<br />
Scottish Government identified 69 people with mental health problems who<br />
received housing support services. There are currently 23 specialist or shared<br />
establishments for people with mental health issues run by Loretto HA, Penumbra,<br />
Barony HA and the Scottish Association for Mental Health.<br />
3.36 Whilst it is considered at this stage that the housing needs of individuals suffering<br />
from mental illness can usually be addressed through mainstream housing, it is<br />
necessary to determine the need for specific house types through the HNDA. This<br />
work is ongoing and will be informed by consultation with stakeholders. The LHS<br />
2011-16 will consider the need for housing support services for this client group.<br />
Other Client Groups<br />
3.37 Discussions with Social Work have indicated that other client groups whose<br />
housing needs require to be considered during the period of the next LHS include<br />
those with dementia, Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Alcohol Related Brain<br />
Disorder (ARBD). Work to provide specialist housing for people with dementia is<br />
underway as part of the review of existing <strong>Council</strong> care home facilities and it is<br />
anticipated that a new development will be proposed in the next LHS and the<br />
2012-2017 SHIP. In relation to ASD and ARBD work is ongoing to identify data<br />
sources to assist in quantifying the extent of need and this analysis will also be<br />
informed through consultation with stakeholders.<br />
28
4. PLANNING & LAND SUPPLY<br />
4.1 The purpose of this section is to outline key linkages between the planning system<br />
and the delivery of affordable housing with particular emphasis on matters relating<br />
to land supply. Work between partners continues to be done to address the issue<br />
of constraints which can delay the development process and whilst project specific<br />
constraints in respect of funding and land are addressed in Table 4 (Section 4.29),<br />
consideration continues to be given as to how more general constraints can be<br />
mitigated.<br />
Structure and Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
4.2 A key aim of the <strong>Council</strong>’s Structure <strong>Plan</strong> is to promote sustainable growth in all<br />
communities in the <strong>Council</strong> area. In support of this growth strategy, the <strong>Council</strong> set<br />
a population target of 152,000 by 2020. The growth strategy has had considerable<br />
success since the start of the decade and the estimated population of the <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> area now stands at 152,480, an increase of over 7000 since 2001. The<br />
planned population growth has now almost been achieved, well ahead of schedule.<br />
4.3 The Structure <strong>Plan</strong> noted that for this population target to be achieved, around<br />
13,800 houses would need to be built between 2001 and 2020. Since 2001 there<br />
have been 6,311 recorded house completions in <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area. However,<br />
recent trends in terms of the “credit crunch” and rates of new house building may<br />
mean that previous targets will need to be reviewed through the new Local<br />
Development <strong>Plan</strong> process.<br />
Local Development <strong>Plan</strong><br />
4.4 Under the new <strong>Plan</strong>ning, etc (Scotland) Act 2006 the <strong>Council</strong> will have to prepare a<br />
Local Development <strong>Plan</strong> (LDP) to replace the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Structure <strong>Plan</strong> and<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong>. In May <strong>2010</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> published its first update of the<br />
Local Development <strong>Plan</strong> Scheme which sets out the revised timetable for LDP<br />
preparation, outlines the range of supporting work required to provide the plan’s<br />
evidence base, and summarises the purpose of each stage of the plan. A critical<br />
component of the LDP will be the <strong>Housing</strong> Need and Demand Assessment (HNDA),<br />
which will provide the evidence base for setting future housing supply targets for<br />
both market and affordable housing. Work on the HNDA is underway and will be<br />
completed shortly. This will then feed into the LDP Main Issues Report, the first<br />
main document of the LDP process, which will set out options for sites for future<br />
housing land allocations.<br />
29
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy<br />
4.5 Supplementary <strong>Plan</strong>ning Guidance (SPG) was approved in January 2009 in relation<br />
to the method of delivering the <strong>Council</strong>’s Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy. By then, the<br />
economic downturn was underway and there has been a severe reduction in<br />
house-building activity by the private sector. In the light of this, the <strong>Council</strong> is<br />
undertaking a review of the Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy and SPG with a view to<br />
reducing the threshold for the size of sites which would come within the scope of<br />
the policy. This would extend the requirement to provide an element of affordable<br />
housing on smaller sites, on which developers appear to be concentrating their<br />
resources in the current economic climate. In August <strong>2010</strong>, the Scottish<br />
Government published PAN2/<strong>2010</strong> Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> and <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audits<br />
which replaces the old PAN74 and appendix to SPP3 and this will be taken into<br />
account as part of the <strong>Council</strong>’s review of the Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy and<br />
subsequent SPG.<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Initiatives for Residential-led Regeneration (SIRRs)<br />
4.6 In addition to the base housing requirement, <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Structure <strong>Plan</strong> and<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> Finalised Draft (deposit version) have indicated four locations - <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Initiatives for Residential-led Regeneration (SIRRs) - where residential development<br />
will be encouraged to assist regeneration:<br />
4.7 • Banknock and Haggs,<br />
• Bo’ness Foreshore,<br />
• Whitecross,<br />
• Slamannan.<br />
4.8 These locations offer the potential for large-scale development in areas that have<br />
lacked investment to date. Each location does, however, have particular<br />
constraints in terms of physical infrastructure. The provision of social infrastructure<br />
and, in some cases, economic development opportunities, will also be essential to<br />
secure regeneration. Development will be conditional on the provision of a<br />
comprehensive master plan for the areas concerned, the provision of the necessary<br />
infrastructure through a co-ordinated approach to developer contributions,<br />
appropriate phasing and satisfactory environmental assessments.<br />
4.9 Three of the four SIRRs offer real potential for affordable housing land to be made<br />
available through the Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy by working in partnership with the<br />
developers to ensure that mixed tenure communities are incorporated within each<br />
of the master plans. At the time the Bo’ness SIRR was declared there was no<br />
expectation that affordable housing would be part of its overall vision, however, the<br />
downturn in the housing markets now means that this position will need to be<br />
reviewed. During the period of this SHIP, progress on each of the three SIRRs<br />
which are expected to deliver affordable housing will be monitored and reported on<br />
to ensure necessary resources are programmed and allocated to meet affordable<br />
housing requirements.<br />
30
Banknock and Haggs<br />
4.10 In June 2009 the Development Framework for the Banknock and Haggs SIRR was<br />
approved as supplementary planning guidance. A planning application to develop<br />
the Cannerton Brickworks part of the SIRR area was submitted in May <strong>2010</strong>. It is<br />
conceivable that affordable housing could begin to be delivered on this site from<br />
2012 although progress will be dictated by the speed at which the masterplan and<br />
the subsequent planning application for the site progress.<br />
4.11 The <strong>Council</strong>’s main development land interest lies within the southern part of the<br />
overall SIRR. The combined southern site is owned by <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and a<br />
private developer. Both parties are currently working together to masterplan the<br />
combined southern site to establish its overall viability. The masterplanning<br />
exercise should be complete by the end of <strong>2010</strong>. It is hoped that the<br />
masterplanning exercise confirms there is sufficient value in the land to meet the<br />
required primary infrastructure improvements needed to facilitate the overall SIRR,<br />
with some residual land to allow the delivery of additional new affordable housing<br />
by the <strong>Council</strong> or an RSL partner. Obviously, the overall SIRR will also need to<br />
meet the <strong>Council</strong> affordable housing policy requirements and could potentially<br />
deliver circa. 100 affordable homes, if sufficient Scottish Government funding is<br />
made available to support this.<br />
Whitecross<br />
4.12 Objections to the definition of the Whitecross SIRR as outlined in the <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong> Finalised Draft (Deposit Version) were withdrawn prior to the<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> Inquiry. A draft masterplan produced by the land owner will be modified<br />
and converted into draft supplementary planning guidance during late 2009. A<br />
planning application for developing Whitecross SIRR was submitted in March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
4.13 The <strong>Council</strong> facilitated a meeting between the Developer and interested RSL<br />
partners in July <strong>2010</strong> to share information on the overall vision for the SIRR and<br />
discuss how the affordable housing requirement for it could be delivered. Based on<br />
the <strong>Council</strong>’s current Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy the overall SIRR, which consists of<br />
1,500 new homes, could potentially deliver 225 new affordable homes if sufficient<br />
Scottish Government funding is made available. The Developer will continue to<br />
liaise with interested RSL partners throughout the pre-development period.<br />
Slamannan<br />
4.14 The extent of development sites within the Slamannan SIRR was considered at the<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> Inquiry during the Spring of 2009. The Reporter’s recommendations for<br />
Slamannan were considered by the <strong>Council</strong> in June <strong>2010</strong> and the <strong>Council</strong> has<br />
made modifications to the Local <strong>Plan</strong> which have reduced the overall scale of<br />
development within the Slamannan SIRR to around 650 units, including the deletion<br />
of two sites. Now that the extent of development sites is confirmed (subject to final<br />
adoption of the Local <strong>Plan</strong> by the end of <strong>2010</strong>) the preparation of a Development<br />
Framework will follow. Based on the <strong>Council</strong>’s current Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy,<br />
the overall SIRR could potentially deliver 97 new affordable homes if sufficient<br />
Scottish Government funding is made available. Due to limited market interest, it<br />
seems unlikely that affordable housing would be delivered on site until after 2014.<br />
31
<strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit<br />
4.15 The <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit (HLA) is the mechanism that <strong>Plan</strong>ning authorities use to<br />
monitor housing land supply and identify those sites which are to be effective within<br />
a 5 year period. It is produced annually, with the <strong>Council</strong>’s most recent HLA being<br />
published in April <strong>2010</strong>. The HLA is produced in partnership with a range of<br />
stakeholders including developers, Homes for Scotland, RSLs and land owners. In<br />
August <strong>2010</strong> the Scottish Government published PAN2/<strong>2010</strong> Affordable <strong>Housing</strong><br />
and <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audits which replaces the old PAN74 and appendix to SPP3.<br />
The advice recommends that HLA’s in future distinguish between affordable and<br />
market housing sites when monitoring development progress.<br />
4.16 The Structure <strong>Plan</strong> sets the housing land requirements to 2020 which will be met<br />
through the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong> using HLA sites, taking account of house<br />
completions since 2001, additional committed sites and new land allocations.<br />
4.17 The effective housing land supply is defined as those sites which are expected to<br />
be free of development constraints over the next 5 years and therefore available for<br />
house-building. The 2009/10 HLA identified a total capacity of 2447 units over a 5<br />
year period from within this effective land supply.<br />
4.18 The <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit also identifies sites deemed as being ‘non-effective’ due to<br />
development constraints or where the land owner has not taken any action to bring<br />
the site forward for development within the Local <strong>Plan</strong> period.<br />
4.19 The <strong>Council</strong> and RSL development partners have carried out an analysis of all noneffective<br />
sites and contact has been made with land owners to try to establish if<br />
they would be willing to negotiate the sale of their land to create a land bank for<br />
RSL housing development. Discussions with land owners and RSLs will continue<br />
where appropriate. The HLA also helps to identify sites which will have an<br />
affordable housing requirement through the <strong>Council</strong>’s Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy<br />
(AHP), sites with a requirement are detailed in Appendix 4a and maps in Appendix<br />
4b.<br />
Scottish Vacant and Derelict Land Survey (SVDLS)<br />
4.20 The SVDLS is undertaken to establish the extent of vacant and derelict land<br />
throughout Scotland and the amount of land that has been added or reclaimed on<br />
an annual basis. A register of sites provides information on local sites, which it is<br />
hoped will help to encourage their re-use or development in accordance with the<br />
Development <strong>Plan</strong> and other planning guidance. The purpose of this exercise is to<br />
identify any sites which could offer future affordable housing opportunities. The<br />
review undertaken in 2009 saw three sites removed from the SVDLS and two<br />
added; of this none of the new sites was considered suitable for residential use.<br />
32
Open Space Strategy<br />
4.21 The <strong>Council</strong> recognises the benefits that a range of high quality, accessible, green<br />
open spaces and urban civic spaces can make to a community. The range of<br />
benefits identified for green space is dependent upon the way that the resource is<br />
planned, designed and managed. On that basis, and in line with national planning<br />
policy, the <strong>Council</strong> approved an Open Space Strategy in June <strong>2010</strong> to guide future<br />
investment, development and maintenance programmes. The Open Space<br />
Strategy proposes a set of criteria which will have to be considered during any open<br />
space asset disposal and realisation across the <strong>Council</strong> area. Once this set of<br />
criteria is approved it can be used to help identify open space sites whose loss<br />
would have the least adverse impact on the community and which might then be<br />
available for reuse as sites for affordable/social housing.<br />
Current & Future Land Supply<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Owned Land<br />
4.22 A significant amount of new RSL provision in the past ten years has been on vacant<br />
and brownfield land owned by the <strong>Council</strong>. Throughout the period of the 2004-09<br />
LHS, development sites were created through the restructuring and redevelopment<br />
of low demand housing, consistent with the stock strategy set out in the LHS.<br />
Following demolitions and housing regeneration activity, a significant number of<br />
projects have recently been completed through the Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong><br />
Programme (AHIP). Recently completed projects include:<br />
• Wood Street, Grangemouth – 73 units (RSL),<br />
• Craigleith Road, Grangemouth – 32 units (RSL),<br />
• Lomond Drive, Langlees – 32 units (RSL),<br />
• Inver & Birnam Court, Langlees – 44 units (RSL),<br />
• Corbiehall, Bo’ness – 16 units (RSL).<br />
4.23 Projects currently under construction or planned on land created through the LHS<br />
stock restructuring/demolition programme include:<br />
• Chisholm Place, Grangemouth – 12 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Carron Road, <strong>Falkirk</strong> – 46 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Chequers, Hallglen – 18 units (<strong>Council</strong>).<br />
4.24 In terms of securing an adequate supply of land for taking forward the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
strategic objective of building more council houses, a significant amount of work<br />
has been undertaken in the past year to identify land in <strong>Council</strong> ownership that has<br />
the potential to facilitate a future <strong>Council</strong> house building programme. Almost 200<br />
potential sites were identified from land held on the <strong>Housing</strong> Revenue Account and<br />
other holding accounts and each was considered in relation to the following issues:<br />
• Land Ownership (i.e. holding account),<br />
• <strong>Plan</strong>ning Status,<br />
• <strong>Housing</strong> Needs Assessment Priority,<br />
• Site Capacity.<br />
33
4.25 The list of nearly 200 sites was then refined down to 77 sites (Appendix 5a) upon<br />
which <strong>Council</strong> Members were consulted and this final list was then prioritised using<br />
a scoring matrix that took account of land account holder, planning status, <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Needs Assessment, current land use and Members’ feedback. Detailed technical<br />
design feasibility studies have been carried out over the past year to identify which<br />
of the 77 sites could provide potential housing development opportunities. These<br />
detailed assessments took account of:<br />
• Topography,<br />
• Ground Conditions,<br />
• Known Constraints,<br />
• Accessibility,<br />
• Infrastructure Constraints,<br />
• Utility Constraints,<br />
• Surrounding Environment,<br />
• Notional Site Capacity.<br />
4.26 This lengthy but invaluable piece of work will inform the affordable housing plans<br />
that will be set out in the next LHS (2011-16) and will form the platform on which the<br />
2012-2017 and subsequent SHIPs can be based. Appendix 5a sets out the<br />
process by which the land now being considered for future <strong>Council</strong> house building<br />
has been identified and provides details about the deliverability of each site, listed<br />
from the most deliverable to the least deliverable. Of the 77 sites, 5 have already<br />
been identified for new <strong>Council</strong> housing utilising Scottish Government grant funding.<br />
Further work is now required to establish which other sites can be brought forward<br />
for consideration as potential future <strong>Council</strong> new build projects. Of the remaining<br />
77 sites, 53 (74%) are currently classified as open space and these will need to be<br />
assessed using the criteria set out in the Open Space Strategy to establish whether<br />
they are suitable for new housing development. The overall assessment process<br />
may also identify potential sites for future partnership working with our RSL partners<br />
to be considered for future SHIPs.<br />
4.27 Projects contained within the main SHIP or the <strong>Council</strong>’s New Build Programme<br />
which are presently under construction or planned on land currently or previously<br />
owned by the <strong>Council</strong> include:<br />
Projects Under Construction:<br />
• Mayfield Drive, Longcroft – 16 units (RSL),<br />
• McTaggart Avenue, Denny – 10 units (RSL),<br />
• Chisholm Place, Grangemouth – 12 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Shiel Gardens, Langlees – 20 units (<strong>Council</strong>).<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ned Projects:<br />
• Carron Road/Haugh St, <strong>Falkirk</strong> – 36 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Carron Road/Millflats St, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - 10 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Chequers, Hallglen – 18 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Cadzow Avenue, Bo’ness – 24 units (<strong>Council</strong>),<br />
• Auchincloch Drive, Banknock – 30 units (RSL).<br />
34
4.28 In terms of the development of the land at Auchincloch Drive which was recently<br />
refused planning consent, it is anticipated that the RSL developer (Link Group) will<br />
wish to pursue an appeal to Scottish Ministers.<br />
Other Public Sector Land<br />
4.29 In addition to the land owned by the <strong>Council</strong> there will be an ongoing need to work<br />
in partnership with other public sector agencies to identify land owned by them<br />
which may have the potential to deliver future land supply in the area. Discussions<br />
have taken place with Forth Valley NHS, Central Scotland Police, Central Scotland<br />
Countryside Forestry Trust and the Scottish Rural Property & Business Association<br />
on land assets and possible future partnership opportunities. Other public bodies<br />
such as the Ministry of Defence and Scottish Water have confirmed they have no<br />
developable land holding within the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area.<br />
4.30 Liaison between the <strong>Council</strong> and Central Scotland Police led to the <strong>Council</strong><br />
acquiring two police stations in Denny and Stenhousemuir in March <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />
original intention was to provide new <strong>Council</strong> housing on the sites which would also<br />
complement ongoing regeneration activity in the Denny and Stenhousemuir town<br />
centres. Proposals were included in the <strong>Council</strong>’s bid for a share of the Scottish<br />
Government’s phase 2 funding; however, this element of the <strong>Council</strong>’s bid was<br />
unsuccessful. As a result, an option and financial appraisal for each site is now<br />
progressing and a further update will be provided to Members to establish an<br />
agreed way forward.<br />
Land in Private Ownership<br />
4.31 In addition to the land identified through the work described above, in the longer<br />
term further sites should be secured through the <strong>Council</strong>’s Affordable <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Policy, <strong>Strategic</strong> Initiatives for Residential-Led Regeneration (SIRR) and the Local<br />
Development <strong>Plan</strong> process. One positive consequence of the credit crunch has<br />
been that some land owners and developers have been more willing to consider the<br />
development of affordable housing on their land. Discussions have been held with<br />
developers and private land owners and 64 development opportunities have been<br />
brought to the attention of the <strong>Council</strong> and its RSL partners since the start of the<br />
‘credit crunch’ in late 2008 (Appendix 5b and 5c map). Of the 64 development<br />
opportunities: 2 projects have been completed, 13 projects are contained within the<br />
<strong>2010</strong> SHIP main programme, 2 projects are contained within the <strong>2010</strong> SHIP<br />
“shadow” programme and 2 projects are being investigated for inclusion within<br />
future SHIPs. As a result, there is now sufficient land to support not just the main<br />
programme outlined in this SHIP but also a “shadow” programme that could be<br />
implemented if additional resources become available.<br />
35
4.32 Figure E below shows land ownership in relation to the 16 proposed development<br />
sites contained in the main <strong>2010</strong> SHIP and the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build<br />
Programme which have the capacity to deliver 472 new affordable homes over the<br />
next five years.<br />
Figure E<br />
Constraints<br />
25%<br />
13%<br />
Source: SHIP template<br />
Summary of Land Ownership<br />
26%<br />
37%<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Private Developer<br />
Private Owner<br />
RSL/ <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Association<br />
4.33 Whilst it is always possible that in any development programme problems can arise<br />
which could not reasonably have been foreseen, in the main good forward planning<br />
can help address many of the likely difficulties that could be encountered. Over the<br />
past couple of years the <strong>Council</strong> and its partners have tried to address issues that<br />
have previously caused programming delays by introducing Development<br />
Checklists (Appendix 6) and positively encouraging early dialogue between<br />
development partners, appropriate <strong>Council</strong> departments and relevant external<br />
statutory bodies to try and mitigate any known constraints. Table 4 below sets out<br />
the mitigating actions that should assist in improving project deliverability in the<br />
period covered by this SHIP. The actions outlined below will be regularly reviewed<br />
and extended as further experience informs the development process.<br />
36
Table 4: Programme Constraints & Mitigations<br />
Programme Constraints & Mitigations<br />
Constraints Mitigating Actions<br />
Funding - uncertainty regarding<br />
future investment levels<br />
Funding - reduction in HAG<br />
levels<br />
Availability of land in pressured<br />
areas<br />
Ground condition issues/<br />
abnormal costs<br />
Infrastructure issues - Scottish<br />
Water<br />
Access/ <strong>Plan</strong>ning issues<br />
Difficulties in gaining<br />
agreement of owners of<br />
adjacent land if wayleaves or a<br />
ransom situation exists<br />
Effective liaison with the Scottish Government in order to<br />
prioritise projects and progress land acquisitions to allow<br />
projects to be brought forward if required<br />
Partnership working with Scottish Government to take forward<br />
an efficiency agenda<br />
Partnership working with the Scottish Government to ensure<br />
the programme is flexible enough to recognise higher<br />
development costs in certain areas and/or house types<br />
Ensure Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy is applied to relevant sites<br />
Site investigation at an early stage<br />
Ensure land values reflect remediation costs<br />
Early discussions with Scottish Water to identify constraints<br />
Early discussions with <strong>Plan</strong>ning/ Roads Services regarding<br />
potential issues with the design of a project and access issues,<br />
discussion regarding planning gain<br />
Effective internal liaison within the <strong>Council</strong><br />
Partnership Team liaise with <strong>Plan</strong>ning Services regarding the<br />
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy and where potential projects are<br />
likely to fall within the period of the <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Identify issues as early as possible in the development process<br />
in order to enter into negotiations as early as possible<br />
Ensure there is a sufficient supply of sites in the existing<br />
programme to allow other projects to be brought forward due to<br />
slippage in timing of projects coming forward<br />
37
5. SHIP SUMMARY UPDATE<br />
5.1 Over the years, the <strong>Council</strong> has worked successfully in partnership with Registered<br />
Social Landlords (RSLs) and developers to create new affordable housing for rent<br />
and low-cost home ownership. However, over past two years the <strong>Council</strong> has been<br />
in a position to take advantage of an increase in Scottish Government grant funding<br />
as a result of having a strong deliverable 5 year forward programme developed<br />
through the <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning framework. This has allowed<br />
the delivery of a significant number of new affordable homes in 2009-10 & <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
to meet local housing needs and offer a wider choice of affordable housing options<br />
within the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area. The SHIP has been delivered through a strong<br />
relationship between partners and a willingness from all partners to make financial<br />
contributions towards the delivery of new affordable homes.<br />
2009-10 SHIP Outcomes<br />
5.2 • Total AHIP funding received - £9,138,929<br />
• Total of 123 new affordable homes delivered:<br />
• 43 completed units at Wood St, Grangemouth,<br />
• 32 completed units at Craigleith Road, Grangemouth,<br />
• 32 completed units at Lomond Drive, Langlees,<br />
• 16 completed units at Westway Apartments, Bo’ness.<br />
In addition to new units delivered through the core AHIP, affordable units have also<br />
been delivered via:<br />
Existing supply with change of tenure to affordable housing - 27 units:<br />
• 6 units through the RSL Mortgage to Rent scheme,<br />
• 21 units through the Open Market Shared Equity scheme (OMSE).<br />
Wood Street, Grangemouth Lomond Drive, Langlees<br />
38
<strong>2010</strong> -11 SHIP Targets<br />
5.3 • Total AHIP fund target - £5,341,000<br />
• Total unit approval target – 55 units:<br />
• 21 units at Bellsdyke Hospital site, Larbert,<br />
• 28 units at Overton, Redding,<br />
• 6 units at Bridge Street, Bonnybridge.<br />
• Total unit completion target – 119 units:<br />
• 30 units at Wood Street, Grangemouth (Complete),<br />
• 43 units at Torwoodlea, Larbert (Complete),<br />
• 20 units at Thorndene Terrace, Slamannan (Complete),<br />
• 16 units at Mayfield Drive, Longcroft (On-site),<br />
• 10 units at McTaggart Avenue, Denny (On-site).<br />
In addition to new affordable units delivered through the core AHIP, units will also<br />
be delivered via:<br />
<strong>Council</strong> new Build programme – 96 units:<br />
• 8 units at Sawers Avenue, (Complete),<br />
• 4 units at Carse Crescent, Laurieston (Complete),<br />
• 12 units at Chisholm Place, Grangemouth (On-site),<br />
• 10 units at Carron Road(Small site), Bainsford (On-site),<br />
• 20 units at Shiel Gardens, Langlees (On-site),<br />
• 18 units at Chequers, Hallglen (On-site),<br />
• 24 units at Cadzow Avenue, Bo’ness (Due on-site Dec <strong>2010</strong>).<br />
Existing supply with change of tenure to affordable housing - 18 units:<br />
• 8 units completed through the <strong>Council</strong>’s Mortgage to Rent scheme,<br />
• 2 units completed through the RSL Mortgage to Rent scheme,<br />
• 8 units completed through the OMSE scheme.<br />
Sawers Avenue, Denny Carse Crescent, Lauriston<br />
39
6. RESOURCES<br />
General Background<br />
6.1 The <strong>Council</strong> is committed to meeting its key strategic objectives within the <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Community <strong>Plan</strong>, Single Outcome Agreement and Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy by:<br />
• Increasing the supply of affordable housing options which meet the needs of<br />
local people;<br />
• Ensuring the provision of good quality housing by investing in existing stock<br />
and regeneration activity;<br />
• Promoting sustainability and energy efficiency within the <strong>Council</strong>’s housing<br />
stock across all tenures and addressing issues of fuel poverty affecting<br />
vulnerable households.<br />
6.2 A strategic approach to financing these key objectives has been adopted which<br />
aims to maximise the use of a range of funding streams that contribute both to<br />
increasing the number of new affordable homes in the area and ensure the ongoing<br />
viability of the existing housing stock. For example, tackling issues of disrepair in<br />
private sector housing, improving the quality of social rented housing and carrying<br />
out adaptations to existing stock to make homes more attractive or more suitable for<br />
people in housing need, all contribute to the overall provision of affordable housing.<br />
6.3 Over the past 5 years £28m of grant funding from the AHIP has been made<br />
available for investment by RSLs in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area as detailed in Figure F<br />
below. Funding peaked in 2009/10 with a grant out-turn figure of £9,138,929.<br />
However, as a result of the National Government’s austerity measures to reduce the<br />
budget deficit, it is likely that the future will bring reduced budgets across all<br />
government departments. Figures from the Scottish Government show that we are<br />
entering a long period, perhaps as many as 16 years, before the budget will return<br />
in real terms to 2009-10 levels – Figure F below.<br />
Figure F<br />
£10,000,000<br />
£9,000,000<br />
£8,000,000<br />
£7,000,000<br />
£6,000,000<br />
£5,000,000<br />
£4,000,000<br />
£3,000,000<br />
£2,000,000<br />
£1,000,000<br />
£0<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> AHIP Expenditure Out-turn Figures<br />
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 <strong>2010</strong>/11*<br />
* <strong>2010</strong>-11 – Estimated out-turn figure<br />
40<br />
Out-Turn Figures
6.4 The 2009-10 peak in funding for the <strong>Council</strong> area involved the award of £8m from<br />
the AHIP, comprising: £5m core programme, £2m to reflect particular pressures in<br />
relation to homelessness and £1m to relieve carry forward pressures.<br />
Subsequently, as a result of additional resources becoming available from Barnett<br />
Consequentials 6 , a further £1.1m was allocated for RSL investment taking the<br />
overall budget for 2009-10 to £9.138m. The core AHIP allocation for the area in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11 fell to £4.341m as a direct result of previous accelerated funding but, due<br />
to additional resources once again becoming available from Barnett<br />
Consequentials, a further £1m has been allocated taking the total core AHIP<br />
allocation for the <strong>Council</strong> area in <strong>2010</strong>-11 to £5.341m.<br />
6.5 The Scottish Government’s Chief Economic Adviser provided an updated Outlook<br />
for Scottish Government Expenditure in early July <strong>2010</strong>. The latest projections<br />
published by the Scottish Government’s Chief Economic Adviser 7 suggested that:<br />
• The Scottish budget in real terms will contract for six consecutive years from<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11;<br />
• Total Scottish Government Departmental Expenditure Limits (DEL) will<br />
decrease by 3.3 per cent per year on average in real terms over the next four<br />
years – with the bulk of the expected adjustment occurring in 2011-12;<br />
• The Scottish budget will contract by 12.5 per cent in real terms by 2014-15<br />
compared to <strong>2010</strong>-11;<br />
• By the end of the <strong>2010</strong> Spending Review period in 2014-15, the Scottish<br />
budget will be approximately £4.3 billion below its 2009-10 peak in real<br />
terms;<br />
• Scottish Government Capital DEL is set to fall by £1.6 billion, around 40 per<br />
cent, in real terms between 2009-10 and 2014-15;<br />
• It may take 16 years (to 2025-26) for the Scottish Government’s total budget<br />
to return to its 2009-10 levels in real terms – Figure G below.<br />
Figure G – Estimated Scottish Government DEL Expenditure<br />
6<br />
The Barnett formula is used by the Government to adjust automatically the amount of public expenditure allocated to Scotland to<br />
reflect changes in spending levels allocated to public services.<br />
7<br />
Source - Independent Budget Review Report – The Report of Scotland’s Independent Budget Review Panel. July <strong>2010</strong><br />
41
6.6 The remainder of this Section looks at the various funding streams that contribute to<br />
the overall provision of affordable housing in the <strong>Council</strong> area covering firstly,<br />
external funding streams and then the <strong>Council</strong>’s own funding contribution.<br />
External Funding<br />
AHIP Resources Assumptions 2011/12 – 2015/16<br />
6.7 The final settlement for the Scottish Government’s Departmental Expenditure Limits<br />
will not be known until the Comprehensive Spending Review is concluded in<br />
October <strong>2010</strong>. In the meantime, it is clear that each budget holding body will<br />
require to take measures to reduce its expenditure to match its own circumstances.<br />
Although the specifics of where the budget reductions will take place have not been<br />
confirmed at the time of this SHIP being published, indications suggest that each<br />
Government department will be required to make budget planning reductions of 25<br />
per cent with further planning scenarios considered based on 40 per cent reductions<br />
in budget over the four year period of the <strong>2010</strong> Spending Review period.<br />
6.8<br />
In the absence of definite resource planning figures from the Scottish Government,<br />
agreement with its <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Division has established that a pragmatic<br />
response to resource planning assumptions for the 2011-2016 SHIP would be to<br />
base them on a 25 per cent reduction in the <strong>2010</strong>-11 AHIP allocation over the four<br />
years of the <strong>2010</strong> Spending Review period. The charts below (Figures H & I<br />
overleaf) illustrate resource planning assumptions for the <strong>Council</strong> area based the<br />
two scenarios (a) on a 25% and (b) a 40% reduction over four years using the AHIP<br />
allocation of £5.341m in <strong>2010</strong>-11 as the baseline figure. The development funding<br />
resources required in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area during the period 20011/12 - 2015/16<br />
are detailed in the templates provided by the Scottish Government’s <strong>Housing</strong> &<br />
Regeneration Directorate (Appendix 1a).<br />
Figure H<br />
£6,000,000<br />
£5,000,000<br />
£4,000,000<br />
£3,000,000<br />
£2,000,000<br />
£1,000,000<br />
£0<br />
<strong>2010</strong> SHIP Resource Assumptions 2011/12 - 2015/16<br />
2011/12 2112/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16<br />
25% reduction in £5.341m<br />
core grant allocation over 4<br />
years<br />
40% reduction in £5.341m<br />
core grant allocation over 4<br />
years<br />
6.9 Following deductions for Stage 3 Grants, which are designed to assist RSLs to carry<br />
out adaptations to their existing stock to meet the changing needs of tenants, the<br />
potential number of new social rented units delivered over the 5 years of the <strong>2010</strong><br />
SHIP based on a 25% & 40% reduction in grant allocation would be as noted in<br />
Figure I below:<br />
42
Figure I<br />
Year<br />
25%<br />
reduction in<br />
£5.341m<br />
grant<br />
allocation<br />
over 4 years<br />
25%<br />
reduction<br />
in £250k<br />
Stage 3<br />
Budget<br />
FUTURE RESOURCE ASSUMPTIONS<br />
Residual<br />
budget for<br />
new<br />
projects<br />
No. of<br />
social<br />
rented<br />
units<br />
based<br />
on<br />
average<br />
HAG of<br />
£70,000*<br />
40%<br />
reduction in<br />
£5.341m<br />
grant<br />
allocation<br />
over 4 years<br />
40%<br />
reduction<br />
in £250k<br />
Stage 3<br />
Budget<br />
Residual<br />
budget for<br />
new<br />
projects<br />
No. of<br />
social<br />
rented<br />
units<br />
based<br />
on<br />
average<br />
HAG of<br />
£70,000*<br />
2011/12 £5,007,454 £234,375 £4,773,079 68 £4,807,156 £225,000 £4,582,156 65<br />
2112/13 £4,673,624 £218,750 £4,454,874 64 £4,273,027 £200,000 £4,073,027 58<br />
2013/14 £4,339,793 £203,125 £4,136,668 59 £3,738,899 £175,000 £3,563,899 51<br />
2014/15 £4,005,963 £187,500 £3,818,463 55 £3,204,770 £150,000 £3,054,770 44<br />
2015/16 £4,005,963 £187,500 £3,818,463 55 £3,204,770 £150,000 £3,054,770 44<br />
Totals £22,032,797 £1,031,250 £21,001,547 300 £19,228,622 £900,000 £18,328,622 262<br />
* Subsidy level based on figure from <strong>Housing</strong>: Fresh Thinking, New Ideas<br />
6.10 The term “affordable housing” includes a range of tenure options and not just<br />
properties for social renting. Each type of provision requires differing levels of grant<br />
support to make it viable. The funding ranges from an average of £70k per unit for<br />
social rented units built by RSLs to £2k-£4k for the proposed National <strong>Housing</strong> Trust<br />
units. Full details of the grant support provided for current funding mechanisms and<br />
those under development are summarised in the Scottish Government’s discussion<br />
document, <strong>Housing</strong>: Fresh Thinking, Ideas and are detailed in Table 5 overleaf.<br />
43
6.11 Introducing a mix of tenure within suitably sized development projects could allow<br />
more affordable units to be delivered as noted in Table 5 below:<br />
6.12<br />
Table 5 taken from <strong>Housing</strong>: Fresh Thinking, New Ideas<br />
In terms of Scottish Government funding for new <strong>Council</strong> house building, this has<br />
previously been top-sliced from the overall resources available for affordable<br />
housing and allocated to local authorities following a challenge fund bidding<br />
process. Subsidy of £25,000 per unit was provided for successful bids in the first<br />
two tranches of funding with subsidy for the third tranche increased to £30,000 per<br />
unit. If this level of subsidy were applied to the funding assumptions outlined above,<br />
£4,773,079 would allow 159 new <strong>Council</strong> houses to be built but would require the<br />
<strong>Council</strong> to finance the remainder at an estimated cost of £11m. However, it must be<br />
noted that this option is currently not available. An <strong>Investment</strong> Reform Working<br />
Group comprising representatives from the Scottish Government, COSLA, ALACHO<br />
(Association of Local Authority Chief <strong>Housing</strong> Officers) and the SFHA (Scottish<br />
Federation of <strong>Housing</strong> Associations) has recently completed a review of the<br />
arrangements for funding affordable housing and the outputs from this group are<br />
currently being considered by Scottish Ministers. It seems unlikely that any<br />
changes or reforms will impact on the investment programme for the coming year<br />
but there may be amendments that will impact on future years of this SHIP.<br />
44
6.13 To date, decisions about which tenure option should be implemented on each new<br />
development have been based on a range of factors including local housing needs<br />
assessment, individual project costs and funding availability. This approach offers a<br />
degree of flexibility that allows each scheme to be tailored to meet new and<br />
emerging housing needs and take advantage of any new funding streams that may<br />
come on stream. However, it is considered that this issue is one that should be the<br />
subject of consultation with stakeholders in the development of the new LHS and it<br />
may be that a different approach will be adopted in future.<br />
6.14 The table below summarises the total development funding requirements over the<br />
five year period of the SHIP against the six housing market sub areas within the<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area and the shortfall against total units. The totals are derived from<br />
the templates Appendix 1a and do not include committed funding requirements for<br />
RSL projects that are already on site or potential projects that are beyond year 5<br />
(2015-16) of the SHIP. Details of the full project development funding requirements<br />
including committed funding for on-site projects is detailed in Appendices 1b and 1c.<br />
The unit shortfall against potential new units delivered within the period of the 5 year<br />
SHIP is illustrated in Map 1.<br />
6.15 The 5 year main SHIP contains 16 individual RSL partnership projects amounting to<br />
approximately 352 dwellings. A further 6 <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> new build projects are also<br />
included in the SHIP amounting to 120 units. Full details of each project can be<br />
viewed in Appendix 7 Project Summary. When both are added together this gives a<br />
total of 472 units over the period of the SHIP. These projects are detailed in<br />
Appendix 1a - e.<br />
Table 6<br />
Sub<br />
Area<br />
Shortfall<br />
Total<br />
Units<br />
Development Funding by Sub-Area<br />
AHIP<br />
(includes<br />
RSL<br />
Adaptations)<br />
RSL<br />
(Private<br />
Finance &<br />
Reserves)<br />
Capital<br />
<strong>Investment</strong><br />
Funding Requirements £m<br />
LA<br />
Land<br />
Contribution<br />
Scottish<br />
Government<br />
<strong>Council</strong> New<br />
Build Funds<br />
Buyers<br />
Mortgage<br />
Bo’ness A 95 24 £0.172 £0.000 £1.850 £0.150 £0.600 £0.000 £2.772<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
(Sub Area C<br />
+F)<br />
B 210 95 £6.463 £5.014 £0.000 £0.000 £0.000 £0.000 £11.477<br />
C 365 247 £11.765 £8.188 £5.443 £0.500 £2.280 £0.000 £28.176<br />
Grangemouth D -280 12 £0.172 £0.000 £0.796 £0.150 £0.300 £0.000 £1.418<br />
Polmont &<br />
Rural South<br />
E 335 94 £7.027 £4.065 £0.000 £0.000 £0.000 £0.563 £11.655<br />
Total 725 472 £25.599 £17.267 £8.089 £0.800 £3.180 £0.563 £55.498<br />
* Subject to rounding<br />
Source: SHIP template<br />
It should be noted that the “shortfall” figures in the table have been calculated by taking the Annual shortfall as identified by Newhaven<br />
Research in 2007 (see paragraph 3.4) and multiplying this to show the overall shortfall over the five year period of the SHIP.<br />
45<br />
Total
Private Finance<br />
6.16 In addition to Scottish Government funding from the AHIP, RSLs are expected to<br />
access private finance to fund their affordable housing developments. The amount<br />
of private finance required depends on the notional rental income and level of HAG<br />
available in respect of each development. The use of private finance has been<br />
assumed in all projects and is estimated to be around £17.267m (Appendix 1a)<br />
over the period of this 5 year SHIP.<br />
RSL Reserves<br />
6.17 Some RSL development partners have suggested that they would be willing to<br />
consider using their reserves to bridge any funding gap in the delivery of an<br />
affordable housing project. However, this would only be considered as a last resort<br />
once all other avenues of funding have been exhausted. Only one RSL (Key<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Association) has included the use of reserves in their template<br />
submissions for the <strong>2010</strong> SHIP (Appendix 1a).<br />
Mortgage to Rent Scheme<br />
6.18 Since the introduction of the above Scheme in 2003, 32 dwellings have been<br />
purchased by RSLs facilitated through £1.71m of grant subsidy. In June 2009,<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed to participate in the Scheme and, to date, 8 properties have<br />
been purchased through £244k of Scottish Government grant funding and £315k<br />
from <strong>Council</strong> contributions. It is anticipated that there will continue to be a steady<br />
flow of purchases through this Scheme over the period of this SHIP.<br />
Open Market Shared Equity Pilot<br />
6.19 The Open Market Shared Equity Pilot scheme which is operated by Link Group in<br />
the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area allows certain categories of people to buy homes that are<br />
for sale on the open market. The scheme was temporarily expanded across the<br />
whole of Scotland for a one year period ending 31 March <strong>2010</strong>. The aim of the<br />
scheme was to help support the housing market during the current difficult<br />
economic climate. In 2009-10, 21 homes were purchased through the scheme in<br />
the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area facilitated through £650k of grant funding from the Scottish<br />
Government. Due to the very high level of demand from potential buyers, some<br />
applicants who previously applied were unable to access the scheme as all the<br />
available funding had been allocated. £20 million from the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget was<br />
allocated to extend the scheme across Scotland to help some of these applicants to<br />
buy a property. As at October <strong>2010</strong>, a further 8 homes have been purchased<br />
through the scheme in the <strong>Council</strong> area facilitated by circa. £171k of grant funding.<br />
It is unknown, at this time, if the scheme will be further extended into 2011-12.<br />
Commuted Payments<br />
6.20 The planning system makes provision for securing commuted sums towards<br />
affordable housing through the use of Section 75 planning agreements. The<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has negotiated a total of £500k in commuted sums which will be used by or<br />
on behalf of the <strong>Council</strong> to upgrade existing housing stock in the<br />
Larbert/Stenhousemuir areas.<br />
46
6.21 As outlined in paragraph 4.5 the <strong>Council</strong> is undertaking a review of the Affordable<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Policy and SPG with a view to reducing the threshold for the size of sites<br />
which would come within the scope of the policy. This could also result in a greater<br />
requirement for commuted payments by developers to meet their obligations under<br />
the policy as an alternative to providing land or built units.<br />
Supporting People Funding<br />
6.22 Supporting People funding is now provided as part of the overall Grant Aided<br />
Expenditure from the Scottish Government and is £9.3m in 2009/10 and £9.5m in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11. The funding provides housing support services for a wide range of needs<br />
throughout the <strong>Council</strong> area. Reviews of support services are currently underway<br />
and once the outcome of the reviews is known, a clearer picture will emerge as to<br />
the role that Supporting People funds will be able to play in meeting the housing<br />
needs of those with particular requirements in the future. Together with the<br />
assessment of particular housing needs that was noted in Section 3, this work will<br />
inform proposals in the next LHS.<br />
Private Sector <strong>Housing</strong> Grant (PSHG)<br />
6.23 The <strong>2010</strong>/11 PSHG budget for <strong>Falkirk</strong> is £1.036m. A similar level of PSHG funding<br />
will be “highlighted” within the <strong>Council</strong>’s General Fund Capital Grant until 2013/14.<br />
At present, this grant remains the primary funding source for the provision of<br />
services to private owners to assist them to address the condition of sub standard<br />
properties in the <strong>Council</strong> area. PSHG also funds aids and adaptations for people<br />
with disabilities which can help resolve individual housing need by supporting<br />
independent living in the community. It should be noted however that following the<br />
removal of the ring-fence around PSHG this funding may be vulnerable to being<br />
used for other issues as wider <strong>Council</strong> priorities determine.<br />
6.24 In keeping with the requirements of the <strong>Housing</strong> (Scotland) Act 2006, the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Interim Statement of Assistance, <strong>Housing</strong> Renewal Area Policy and Below<br />
Tolerable Standard Strategy came into effect on 1 April <strong>2010</strong>. The findings of the<br />
all-tenure house condition survey provided the basis on which these were drafted.<br />
These interim documents will be reviewed in the context of the developing Local<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Strategy over the course of <strong>2010</strong>/11.<br />
6.25 The 2006 Act clearly imposes greater responsibility on owners to maintain and<br />
improve their homes however, the capacity of the <strong>Council</strong> to achieve long term<br />
objectives of maintaining and improving private sector housing may be restricted by<br />
the level of resources available through the PSHG allocation.<br />
47
Care and Repair<br />
6.26 The <strong>Council</strong>’s Care and Repair scheme is aimed at helping older and disabled<br />
people in the private sector to live independently in their own homes by offering<br />
advice and assistance about the availability of financial assistance and how to<br />
organise necessary repair and improvement works. PSHG meets the cost of<br />
financial assistance whilst revenue costs in respect of staffing are met from the<br />
General Fund <strong>Housing</strong> Revenue budget. A pilot Small Repairs Service to owner<br />
occupiers and a pilot Handyman Service across all tenures have been ongoing<br />
since 2008 and were made permanent services in June <strong>2010</strong>. The cost of these<br />
services will be met by PSHG together with a small charge to users<br />
Wider Role Funding<br />
6.27 The Scottish Government’s Wider Role Fund supports RSLs to undertake projects<br />
in local communities which intend to make the life of people living there better.<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> works in partnership with RSLs and other organisations to help<br />
deliver these projects. The most recent use of Wider Role funding in the <strong>Council</strong><br />
area have been in relation to:<br />
• £57k towards a pilot Environmental Project in Grangemouth,<br />
• £122k towards The Older People’s Advice Project,<br />
• £87k towards The Green Action Volunteers Project.<br />
The fund has allocated £36m of Wider Role funding activity throughout Scotland<br />
over the period 2008/9 – <strong>2010</strong>/11, however levels of future funding will not be<br />
known until the Spending Review is concluded.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Funding Streams<br />
6.28 The <strong>Council</strong> also uses its own resources to meet the key strategic objectives<br />
identified within the <strong>Strategic</strong> Community <strong>Plan</strong>, Single Outcome Agreement and<br />
Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy and details of the various funding streams are set out<br />
below.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme<br />
6.29 The <strong>Council</strong> continues to maximise the provision of new social housing locally by<br />
adopting a ‘twin-track’ approach involving both direct provision by the <strong>Council</strong> and<br />
partnership working with RSLs. This allows any HRA resources directed to new<br />
house building to be complemented by external development funding from the<br />
Scottish Government’s Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Programme. Such an<br />
approach also provides a degree of certainty for RSL partners in their forward<br />
planning of investment programmes in the <strong>Council</strong> area by identifying appropriate<br />
development sites for housing partnership projects.<br />
6.30 The <strong>Council</strong>’s new build programme now includes the delivery of an additional 120<br />
new affordable social rented homes over the period of the SHIP (Appendix 1e).<br />
The total cost of delivering these units is estimated to be approximately £12.07m,<br />
comprising: £8.09m capital investment by the <strong>Council</strong>, a <strong>Council</strong> land contribution<br />
of approximately £800k and £3.18m Scottish Government grant funding. The<br />
details of the individual projects are contained within the SHIP templates (Appendix<br />
1a) and in the Project Summary (Appendix 7).<br />
48
Use of <strong>Council</strong> Land/Assets<br />
6.31 Over recent years, <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has disposed of <strong>Council</strong>-owned land to RSL<br />
development partners at affordable land use value, as determined by the District<br />
Valuer. Traditionally, the difference between the full market value and the<br />
affordable land use value formed part of <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s financial contribution<br />
towards increasing the supply of affordable housing by reducing the requirement for<br />
HAG. Over the period of this SHIP, there are currently no <strong>Council</strong> contributions<br />
towards land costs as only one <strong>Council</strong> site is contained within the main SHIP and<br />
this has been assessed by the District Valuer as having the same value for<br />
unrestricted and restricted land use.<br />
6.32 In addition to the <strong>Council</strong>’s financial contribution from reduced land values, further<br />
indirect contributions have been made by providing sites for development through<br />
the demolition of low demand stock. This process, which formed an integral part of<br />
the <strong>Council</strong>’s LHS 2004-09 stock strategy, has required the input of significant<br />
<strong>Council</strong> resources in repurchasing any stock previously sold under the Right to<br />
Buy, as well as making statutory compensation payments to tenants and owners.<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> has also, in most stock disposal projects, arranged and financed<br />
demolitions to create cleared development sites to facilitate parts of the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
new build programme and affordable housing opportunities for our RSL partners.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11 has seen the conclusion of the RSL activity in this respect with the<br />
completion of the development at Wood Street, Grangemouth.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax on Second Homes<br />
6.33 The balance of the funds that have accrued since the introduction in 2005/06 of the<br />
change in <strong>Council</strong> Tax concessions for second homes, is currently £1.216m.<br />
Following Scottish Government confirmation that this funding may be used by local<br />
authorities as a funding stream for new <strong>Council</strong> house building this resource is<br />
being used to reduce borrowing against the rest of the new build programme.<br />
Scottish <strong>Housing</strong> Quality Standard (SHQS)<br />
6.34 In line with the Scottish Government target that the social rented housing stock in<br />
Scotland should meet the SHQS by 2012, the <strong>Council</strong> is using prudential<br />
borrowing to supplement income levels to ensure sufficient investment is available<br />
to do this in respect of its own housing stock. The <strong>Council</strong> is delivering a planned<br />
capital investment programme of SHQS-related works of £15.95m in the current<br />
year falling to £14.75m in 2011-12 and 2012-13. The programme will require to be<br />
kept under constant review to ensure that the resource assumptions remain valid<br />
and the imminent completion of a whole stock condition survey that is currently<br />
underway will assist in ensuring that future planning assumptions are robust.<br />
Repair & Maintenance of Existing Stock<br />
6.35 The <strong>Council</strong>’s strategy to meet the SHQS is supplemented by £14.39m revenue<br />
expenditure per annum to ensure that its existing stock is repaired and maintained<br />
to an acceptable standard. This sum includes provision for aids and adaptations<br />
to the existing stock to meet the needs of people with disabilities (£1.1m) and all<br />
general maintenance, planned maintenance and costs associated with void<br />
houses.<br />
49
6.36 The overall financial contribution that the <strong>Council</strong> will be making to the provision of<br />
good quality affordable housing over the period of this SHIP is set out in table 7<br />
below:<br />
Summary of Estimated <strong>Council</strong> Contributions over the 5 year period of the SHIP:<br />
Table 7<br />
<strong>Council</strong> New Build (Capital Resources Years 2012-<br />
13)<br />
Contributions<br />
£m<br />
£8.089<br />
Land Contribution £0.800<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax on Second Homes 8<br />
£1.216<br />
SHQS (Capital Resources) £75.000<br />
Repairs & Maintenance (Revenue Funding at<br />
current investment levels)<br />
£71.950<br />
Total Contribution £157.06<br />
Funding Summary<br />
6.37 In terms of the overall SHIP covering the period 2011-16, Figure J below shows<br />
the funding contributions that are anticipated from the various development<br />
partners if all the projects proceed as planned:<br />
Figure J<br />
16%<br />
31%<br />
7%<br />
Summary of Funding<br />
8<br />
This funding stream is contingent on current arrangements in respect of <strong>Council</strong> Tax continuing<br />
50<br />
46%<br />
AHIP<br />
RSL<br />
Local Authority<br />
Other
Project Prioritisation<br />
6.38 In progressing the investment proposals outlined in this SHIP, it is vital that there<br />
are clear priorities that all the development partners understand and to which they<br />
are committed. Given the anticipated reduction in available funding over the<br />
coming years, as above, it is more critical than ever that potential projects are<br />
scrutinised to ensure projects are deliverable, in the right location, and meet<br />
strategic needs. In order to achieve this, a scoring system has been established<br />
to make sure the projects with the greatest overall priority are delivered first.<br />
6.39 As noted above, the resource planning assumptions that underpin this SHIP<br />
involve a 25% reduction in funding over the four years of the <strong>2010</strong> Spending<br />
Review period. However, given that the reduction in funding could be more<br />
significant, it is important that wider scenario planning models are developed that<br />
clearly prioritise projects based upon a robust set of criteria. Clearly defining the<br />
priority of each project allows for projects to be programmed based on the<br />
outcome of the final resource allocations set by the Scottish Government.<br />
6.40 Each project submitted by RSL development partners has been assessed using a<br />
scoring matrix based on the following criteria:<br />
• Contribution towards the <strong>Council</strong>’s strategic objectives<br />
• Contribution towards meeting priority housing need<br />
• Land ownership<br />
• Current land use<br />
• Statutory approvals<br />
• Finance appraisal<br />
• Regeneration<br />
6.41 Full details of the scoring criteria and the individual project assessments are<br />
detailed in Appendix 8.<br />
51
7.<br />
NEW FUNDING MODELS & PROCUREMENT<br />
General<br />
7.1 The Scottish Government’s housing policy discussion document, <strong>Housing</strong>: Fresh<br />
Thinking, New Ideas poses fundamental questions about the way homes can be<br />
built, allocated, funded and managed. One of the five key themes outlined in the<br />
document is that increasing the supply of affordable housing is critical. The<br />
document identifies that if housing need is to be addressed in this new financial<br />
climate, a fundamental change in the methods employed to finance and deliver new<br />
affordable homes is required. The document outlines a clear message that there is<br />
little prospect of meeting need if delivery is pursued only through traditional funding<br />
models.<br />
7.2 As a result of the financial challenges facing the housing sector, it is clear that new<br />
funding sources and models for increasing the supply of affordable housing are<br />
essential. The discussion document outlines that potential funding models<br />
currently in place or under consideration include:<br />
• <strong>Council</strong> House Building Incentive,<br />
• Leverage models,<br />
• Shared equity,<br />
• Co-operative and mutual home ownership models,<br />
• <strong>Housing</strong> and Infrastructure Loan Fund,<br />
• <strong>Plan</strong>ning Policy, Conditions and Agreements,<br />
• Innovative Bidding Arrangements,<br />
• Landlords getting more value from existing resources,<br />
• New sources of finance for RSLs,<br />
• Cross-subsidy models,<br />
• Reducing barriers to investment.<br />
7.3 <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has a well developed <strong>Council</strong> house building programme and has<br />
demonstrated a willingness to consider and participate in new innovative solutions<br />
to increasing the supply of affordable housing. The <strong>Council</strong> will continue to adopt<br />
this approach to try to meet the strategic objective of increasing the supply of new<br />
affordable housing that provides a diverse range of affordable housing options for<br />
the current and future needs of residents wishing to live in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area.<br />
Procurement<br />
7.4 In terms of procurement and the efficiencies and community benefits that can be<br />
achieved through a strategic approach to it, the <strong>Council</strong> is fully committed to looking<br />
at new ways of delivering objectives and will encourage and contribute to new and<br />
innovative procurement models to ensure the best social return on investment is<br />
achieved when delivering new affordable housing.<br />
52
7.5 The <strong>Council</strong> will continue to liaise and co-operate with the Scottish Government’s<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Division (HID) and with the local RSL Forum to consider the<br />
options for joint/streamlined procurement processes in terms of the projects<br />
outlined in this SHIP. The <strong>Council</strong> will continue to engage with its RSL partners<br />
and HID to develop a procurement framework that will underpin the preparation of<br />
future SHIPs.<br />
7.6 Over the past 4 years the average grant requirement per unit for social rented units<br />
delivered in the <strong>Council</strong> area through the AHIP has reduced year-on-year from an<br />
average of £83,260 per unit in 2006-07 to an average of £66,562 in 2009/10<br />
(Appendix 9). The <strong>Council</strong> will continue to promote and support efficiency savings<br />
which, if this trend continues, will allow more new affordable homes to be delivered<br />
during the impending period of budget contraction.<br />
Community Benefits from Procurement Processes<br />
7.7 <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is actively working towards embedding a community benefits in<br />
procurement approach within <strong>Council</strong> Services and with other public sector<br />
organisations to expand the scope and quantity of employment and training<br />
opportunities linked to the local action plans for increasing skills and employability<br />
for those priority clients of working age who are currently unemployed (Workforce<br />
Plus and More Choices, More Chances).<br />
7.8 A presentation outlining the process and benefits of adopting a community benefits<br />
in procurement approach was presented to the <strong>Falkirk</strong> RSL Forum meeting on 13 th<br />
May <strong>2010</strong>. The <strong>Council</strong> is fully committed to working with RSLs in order to<br />
incorporate local community benefits into their procurement processes.<br />
7.9 This is evidenced in the following ways:<br />
• The <strong>Council</strong> includes community benefit clauses in its building contracts for new<br />
council housing and/or maintenance/repair which require the successful<br />
contractor to provide training opportunities dependent on the size and duration<br />
of the build, e.g. the contract to build 8 new homes at Sawyers Avenue, Denny<br />
required at least one training opportunity to be provided throughout the duration<br />
of the contract,<br />
• The contract for the extensive refurbishment of the high rise flats at Eastburn<br />
Tower, <strong>Falkirk</strong> requires the successful contractor to provide at least four training<br />
opportunities for the duration of the contract,<br />
• Following the success of the Link Group’s projects at Lomond Drive, Langlees<br />
and Wood Street, Grangemouth which provided 9 pre-apprenticeship training<br />
places, a good working relationship has developed to ensure future building<br />
projects incorporate community benefits into the procurement process. A<br />
further example of good working relationships with Link Group resulted in<br />
Persimmon Homes providing two training opportunities at the housing<br />
development at Bellsdyke, Larbert,<br />
53
• A positive meeting took place with Hanover <strong>Housing</strong> Association who agreed to<br />
incorporate community benefits into their procurement process for future builds.<br />
At the time of the meeting the award of the build at Thorndene Terrace was due<br />
to be announced and it was not possible to incorporate community benefits,<br />
however, the successful contractor (CCG Scotland) provided one training<br />
opportunity.<br />
7.10 These positive outcomes demonstrate the value of incorporating community<br />
benefits in the procurement process and supports <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s commitment to<br />
increasing skills and employability for those priority clients of working age that are<br />
currently unemployed.<br />
54
8. REGENERATION<br />
8.1 One of the key themes in the <strong>Council</strong>’s Corporate <strong>Plan</strong> is tackling disadvantage and<br />
discrimination and it is clear that investment in housing and regeneration activity<br />
can play a major role in helping to achieve sustainable improvements in particular<br />
priority areas. An important element in the <strong>Council</strong>’s Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy 2004-<br />
09 was the creation of development opportunities for new social housing through<br />
the redevelopment of areas of low demand housing stock which had blighted local<br />
communities.<br />
8.2 The SIMD 2009 (revised version) identified 17 data zones in the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
area which fall within the worst 15% overall in Scotland (Map 2). There are a total<br />
of 197 data zones in <strong>Falkirk</strong>, each with an average population of 750. The “worst<br />
15% data zones” are those where there are high aggregated measures of<br />
deprivation, based on income, employment, educational attainment, health and<br />
crime. 8.6% of <strong>Falkirk</strong>’s data zones fall within this definition of deprivation. This is a<br />
decrease of 1.4% since the previous SIMD data were published in 2006. Although<br />
there is no significant evidence of deprivation in relation to housing indices, it is<br />
considered that appropriate investment in housing conditions can play an important<br />
role in area regeneration strategies for specific priority estates.<br />
8.3 Those local data zones in the worst 15% in Scotland form the basis of the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
and Community <strong>Plan</strong>ning Partnership’s ten Priority Areas in relation to the<br />
Community Regeneration Strategy (Map 3). Within these areas, housing<br />
investment, involving <strong>Council</strong> stock improvements and development partnership<br />
activity in respect of new social housing provision, will be taken forward through the<br />
Standard Delivery <strong>Plan</strong> (SDP) and <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP).<br />
8.4 The Priority Areas referred to above include parts of:<br />
• Dawson,<br />
• Grangemouth,<br />
• Camelon,<br />
• High Rise Flats, <strong>Falkirk</strong>,<br />
• Maddiston,<br />
• Westquarter,<br />
• Bo’ness,<br />
• Denny,<br />
• ‘The Bog’ area, <strong>Falkirk</strong>,<br />
• ‘The Valley’ area, Stenhousemuir.<br />
55
8.5 In addition to these 10 SIMD Priority Areas there is substantive housing<br />
regeneration activity in other parts of the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area including:<br />
• Town centre areas, where the redevelopment includes existing and<br />
proposed residential accommodation,<br />
• Substantive housing refurbishment projects, for example at Little Denny and<br />
at Drum Road and Corbiehall, Bo’ness,<br />
• New <strong>Council</strong> house building as set out in paragraphs 5.28 and 5.29 above.<br />
8.6 Ongoing estate-based improvements in the Priority Areas are identified through the<br />
development of annual Neighbourhood Improvement <strong>Plan</strong>s which seek to enhance<br />
amenity through environmental improvement projects and housing management<br />
initiatives to complement upgrading of the housing stock. An important factor in<br />
this work is the increasing need to work with owner-occupiers in what are now<br />
multi-tenure estates as a result of the Right to Buy legislation.<br />
8.7 Estate-based environmental improvements are taken forward through a<br />
combination of internal and external funding packages. The funding contributions<br />
from <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> allow grant applications to outside sources and can also<br />
encourage communities to make their own funding applications. For example, The<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Estates Regeneration Outcomes Squads (HEROS) is funded through a<br />
number of sources, including Fairer Scotland. The HEROS provide local people,<br />
particularly local young people, with the opportunity to carry out environmental<br />
improvement projects within their own community, as well as improving their<br />
employability skills. This allows local people to participate directly in the planning<br />
and implementation of local environmental improvements. This level of<br />
involvement is seen as a key part of housing regeneration.<br />
8.8 Spending constraints affecting external agencies, government organisations and<br />
local authorities are likely to affect the scale of future regeneration activity. It is<br />
therefore particularly important to identify projects where selective interventions can<br />
yield significant regeneration outcomes. This means working even more closely<br />
with community groups and with community organisations. It also means that the<br />
scale of the projects may be smaller, focusing on projects such as local community<br />
gardens, school grounds, safe footpaths, improving privacy, treating local eyesores,<br />
and so on.<br />
56
9. SUSTAINABILITY<br />
9.1 Within Firm Foundations and the new consolidated SPP3, the Scottish<br />
Government has demonstrated a strong commitment to sustainable development<br />
through improving energy efficiency, increasing quality and environmental<br />
standards for new housing developments, contributing to reducing carbon dioxide<br />
emissions and helping meet the challenge of climate change. The new Climate<br />
Change (Scotland) Act 2009 which introduces new statutory duties for public<br />
bodies such as local authorities means that there is now increasing pressure to<br />
reduce emissions and generally to exercise their functions in the most sustainable<br />
way – new demanding targets now require to be met. The measures by which<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and its partners aim to tackle this challenging agenda are set out<br />
below.<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Community <strong>Plan</strong><br />
9.2 The <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> Community <strong>Plan</strong>, 2005-<strong>2010</strong>, ‘Working in Partnership for the<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Area’ sets out how all public agencies and community partners will<br />
work together to achieve the vision for the area. This <strong>Plan</strong> provides a strategic<br />
framework that sets out a number of broad priorities for the major public sector<br />
organisations to deliver over this period. The <strong>Plan</strong> sets out a vision for sustainable<br />
development within the <strong>Council</strong> area:<br />
The legacy of our past and the potential of our future are protected. We will invest<br />
in opportunities that support local communities in a balanced and environmentally<br />
sustained way. The principle of sustainable development will underpin all our<br />
decisions and actions.<br />
Priorities for the Future<br />
9.3 In order to achieve the vision and create a sustainable environment the <strong>Council</strong><br />
has agreed to:<br />
• Contribute to action addressing climate change,<br />
• Improve its approach to waste management,<br />
• Improve the quality of the built and natural environment,<br />
• Promote a safe and efficient multi-modal transport system, which minimises<br />
impact on the environment,<br />
• Raise awareness of sustainable development and environmental issues<br />
within communities and with partners.<br />
57
Sustainable <strong>Falkirk</strong> Strategy<br />
9.4 The value placed on the local environment and the importance attached to the<br />
sustainable development approach is further developed through the Sustainable<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> Strategy 2006-10, which commits the <strong>Council</strong> to working towards<br />
sustainable development. This Strategy provides an umbrella for a wide range of<br />
actions aiming to improve the local environment and quality of life, while<br />
contributing to national/global action on the environment. The strategy identifies<br />
the following as priority areas:<br />
• Energy efficiency,<br />
• Wise use of resources,<br />
• Greener transport,<br />
• Protection and enhancement of the natural and man-made environment.<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
9.5 Whilst SPP3 and PAN84 seek to deliver renewable energy targets through the<br />
planning system, the <strong>Council</strong>’s Local <strong>Plan</strong> sets out the principles of sustainable<br />
development by which individual development projects detailed in this SHIP will be<br />
assessed and scrutinised as part of the statutory approval process:<br />
• Policy EQ1 ‘Sustainable Design Principles’ requires all new developments to<br />
achieve a high standard of design quality and compliance with principles of<br />
sustainable development relating to:<br />
- Natural and build heritage,<br />
- Urban and landscape design,<br />
- Accessibility, resource use,<br />
- Infrastructure and maintenance.<br />
• Policy EQ6 ‘Design & Energy Use’ requires developers to demonstrate how they<br />
have assessed and pursued opportunities for sustainable energy use in new<br />
developments where possible, with particular reference to:<br />
- Local climatic factors in the layout and orientation of buildings,<br />
- The utilisation of renewable energy sources to meet the energy needs of<br />
development,<br />
- Combined heat and power and community heating schemes.<br />
Building Standards<br />
9.6 In addition to the measures which can be taken through the planning system,<br />
there is the requirement to satisfy National Building Standards in terms of the<br />
Building (Scotland) Act 2003. Building Standards are supported by Technical<br />
Handbooks which provide guidance on achieving the standards set in the Building<br />
(Scotland) Regulations 2004 and Building (Scotland) Amendment Regulation<br />
<strong>2010</strong>. The Technical Handbooks are available in two volumes, which are in<br />
relation to Domestic and Non-Domestic buildings.<br />
58
9.7 The latest amendments to the Technical Standards for <strong>2010</strong> came into force from<br />
1 October <strong>2010</strong> and set out the minimum standards that must be achieved when<br />
designing new domestic and non-domestic buildings. The <strong>Council</strong> will work with<br />
development partners to ensure that all new developments meet (and where<br />
possible exceed) the minimum standards set out in the Technical Handbooks.<br />
The Technical Handbooks <strong>2010</strong> are guidance documents and allow for alternative<br />
innovative solutions to achieve compliance within the specific performance<br />
Standard. The <strong>2010</strong> amendments in relation to new domestic buildings focus on<br />
improved standards for environmental, noise and energy performance amongst<br />
other changes.<br />
Barriers to Achieving High Environmental Standards<br />
9.8 As noted in paragraph 4.4, the <strong>Council</strong>’s Local <strong>Plan</strong> promotes sustainability by<br />
aiming to achieve quality community infrastructure through developers’<br />
contributions towards the provision of improved infrastructure. Recent planning<br />
consents have required RSL development partners to make a contribution toward<br />
open space provision where they have not met the required open space standard<br />
within the development site. Although this is a planning condition, the <strong>Housing</strong> &<br />
Regeneration Directorate has taken the view that the contributions are not HAG<br />
eligible and this could impact on the deliverability of future partnership<br />
development projects. This is an issue which will require ongoing discussion<br />
between the Scottish Government, local authorities and development partners<br />
such as RSLs and is likely to become an increasing issue in the coming years if<br />
the current constraints on public expenditure continue.<br />
9.9 The <strong>Council</strong> will continue to work in partnership with its RSL development partners<br />
to promote sustainable development and energy efficiency at the design stage of<br />
all new developments contained within the SHIP. However, it is recognised that<br />
delivering highly energy efficient, sustainable homes beyond the statutory targets<br />
has cost implications for development partners which require to be addressed.<br />
Home Energy Strategy<br />
9.10 Progress continues towards meeting the aims of the Home Energy Strategy 2008-<br />
11 which sets out the <strong>Council</strong>’s commitment to improving the energy efficiency of<br />
the housing stock and addressing issues of fuel poverty affecting vulnerable<br />
households. The main focus during <strong>2010</strong>/11 is to improve the energy efficiency of<br />
the housing stock in all tenures and to address the factors that affect fuel poverty.<br />
With this in mind, the <strong>Council</strong> will be continuing its programmes of insulation<br />
improvements and central heating replacement in its own stock and targeting over<br />
15,000 owner occupiers to encourage them to take up assistance with insulation<br />
measures, income maximisation and tariff advice. This latter initiative addresses<br />
fuel poverty and is funded through the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target<br />
funding provided by the Scottish Government and energy companies.<br />
9.11 Partnership with the local Energy Saving Scotland advice centres (ESSac)<br />
continues with the main focus this year being on income maximisation. A number<br />
of events have been planned in conjunction with ESSac to reach residents from all<br />
sectors of the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area.<br />
59
<strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme<br />
9.12 The <strong>Council</strong>’s new build programme aims to deliver high quality, sustainable,<br />
efficient homes that go beyond the standard requirements set out in the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> and the Building Standards. Individual projects will be assessed to<br />
establish the most effective and efficient use of new and emerging technologies to<br />
ensure these new homes are sustainable and energy efficient.<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment (SEA)<br />
9.13 In line with SHIP guidance it is recognised that it is the duty of the <strong>Council</strong> to<br />
establish whether a <strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment (SEA) is required for the<br />
SHIP. A scoping exercise was submitted to the SEA Gateway who advised that a<br />
full SEA was required. A similar exercise with the same result was carried out for<br />
the new style LHS. Although initial screening has been carried out for the SHIP,<br />
following advice from the SEA Gateway, it is proposed to bring together one SEA<br />
for the SHIP and the LHS and this will be done in 2011 as part of the preparation<br />
of the next full LHS 2011-16.<br />
60
10. CONCLUSION<br />
10.1 This SHIP sets out an ambitious housing partnership development programme to<br />
be pursued over the coming five years. It recognises that with a programme of<br />
this scale and complexity, there will be a range of development constraints which<br />
will, in some cases, impact on project deliverability. On this basis, it has been<br />
necessary to plan a programme beyond current resource availability to allow for a<br />
degree of slippage on projects and to ensure that available resources are fully<br />
utilised year to year.<br />
10.2 The SHIP has been prepared against a backdrop of likely significant budget cuts<br />
over the next 4 years - the working assumption on which the SHIP is based is that<br />
there is likely to be a 25% cut in funding over the first four years of the SHIP<br />
depending on the outcomes of the comprehensive spending review. Given the<br />
anticipated reduction in available funding, this SHIP has involved the detailed<br />
scrutiny of every potential project to ensure it is deliverable, in the right location<br />
and meets strategic needs.<br />
10.3 The availability of funding from the Scottish Government will largely determine the<br />
number of units that can be achieved and the programme is flexible enough to<br />
allow projects to be brought forward should additional resources become available<br />
at any point.<br />
10.4 It is considered that this programme provides a strong basis for ongoing liaison<br />
with the <strong>Housing</strong> & Regeneration Directorate in terms of resource allocation and<br />
investment programming. The SHIP also provides a framework for discussions<br />
with RSL partners on future Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy priorities and with private<br />
developers in respect of affordable housing provision.<br />
10.5 As noted above, cognisance has been given to the development constraints that<br />
might hinder project delivery. At a strategic level, the issue of future land supply<br />
for affordable housing will continue to be a significant issue. At the present time,<br />
most of the housing development sites identified through the <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit<br />
over the period of this SHIP already have planning consent: this means that the<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy does not apply to them. With virtually all of<br />
this land being in private ownership, there is a need to continue to explore<br />
appropriate partnership arrangements with land owners, developers and RSLs to<br />
help identify affordable housing opportunities in the longer term.<br />
10.6 At a project level, a variety of development constraints (associated with<br />
infrastructure such as drainage, flood risks and consultation zones, along with a<br />
range of planning requirements) mean that a proactive approach to liaison with<br />
other statutory agencies at the earliest possible stage will be required. A predevelopment<br />
checklist is now in use covering the range of <strong>Council</strong> services<br />
involved in the implementation of housing partnership schemes to help anticipate<br />
and respond to potential constraints and restrictions which might impact on project<br />
delivery; pre-application discussions take place between the <strong>Council</strong> and<br />
RSLs/developers to identify and tackle any constraints at the earliest opportunity.<br />
61
10.7 It is clear that partnership working is a fundamental element of improving housing<br />
conditions and developing new homes for the 21 st century. The framework that<br />
has been established to develop the next Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy forms a firm<br />
foundation for future partnership working to meet local housing needs and this<br />
SHIP demonstrates that <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and its RSL partners are well prepared for<br />
the challenges ahead.<br />
62
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Corporate & Neighbourhood Services<br />
63
APPENDICES
Appendix 1<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>
Appendix 1a<br />
5 Year SHIP Template
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> SHIP 2011 - 2016<br />
Summary 1- Total Programme - units, tenure and type<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 1a<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
Total Supply Target 725 472 -253 -35% 100%<br />
General Needs 725 430 -295 -41% 91%<br />
Special Needs 0 42 42 n/a 9%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 300 300 n/a 64%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 120 120 n/a 25%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 42 42 n/a 9%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 10 10 n/a 2%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Summary of Proposed Units to be Provided by Local Authority<br />
Affordable Rent 120<br />
Mid Rent 0<br />
NSSE 0<br />
LCHO 0<br />
TOTAL 120
Summary 1 - Sub Area Delivery - units, tenure and type<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 1a<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
A - Bo'ness 95 24 -71 -75% 100%<br />
General Needs 95 24 -71 -75% 100%<br />
Special Needs 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
B - Denny & Bonnybridge 210 95 -115 -55% 100%<br />
General Needs 210 89 -121 -58% 94%<br />
Special Needs 0 6 6 n/a 6%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 95 95 n/a 100%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 1a<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
C - <strong>Falkirk</strong> -95 162 257 -271% 100%<br />
General Needs -95 155 250 -263% 96%<br />
Special Needs 0 7 7 n/a 4%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 78 78 n/a 48%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 84 84 n/a 52%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
D - Grangemouth -280 12 292 -104% 100%<br />
General Needs -280 12 292 -104% 100%<br />
Special Needs 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 12 12 n/a 100%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 1a<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
E - Polmont & Rural South 332 94 -238 -72% 100%<br />
General Needs 332 71 -261 -79% 76%<br />
Special Needs 0 23 23 n/a 24%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 84 84 n/a 89%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 10 10 n/a 11%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
No of Units Variance<br />
Units as<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need to be percentage<br />
Sub Area over <strong>Plan</strong> Period delivered of SHIP<br />
as per local through programme<br />
housing strategy proposed SHIP<br />
or agreed update programme Units % %<br />
F - Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural North 463 85 -378 -82% 100%<br />
General Needs 463 79 -384 -83% 93%<br />
Special Needs 0 6 6 n/a 7%<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Affordable - RSL 0 43 43 n/a 51%<br />
LSVT 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Affordable - Other 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Intermediate Affordable<br />
Mid Rent<br />
Mid Rent - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Mid Rent - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
Private Rent 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE<br />
NSSE - RSL 0 42 42 n/a 49%<br />
NSSE - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
NSSE - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
OMSEP 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO<br />
LCHO - RSL 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - LA 0 0 0 n/a 0%<br />
LCHO - PS 0 0 0 n/a 0%
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Summary 2 -Total Programme - potential advantages or constraints on development<br />
TOTAL SHIP PROGRAMME<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 60 13%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 175 37%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 121 26%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 116 25%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 192 41%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 58 12%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 412 87%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 58 12%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 226 48%<br />
Amber 246 52%<br />
Red 0 0%<br />
Summary 2 - Sub Area Delivery - potential advantages or constraints on development<br />
A - Bo'ness<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 24 5%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 0 0%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 0 0%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 24 5%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 0 0%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 24 5%<br />
Amber 0 0%<br />
Red 0 0%
B - Denny & Bonnybridge<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 38 8%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 30 6%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 27 6%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 65 14%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 0 0%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 95 20%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 0 0%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 38 8%<br />
Amber 57 12%<br />
Red 0 0%<br />
C - <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 4 1%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 109 23%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 49 10%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 22 5%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 0 0%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 162 34%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 0 0%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 113 24%<br />
Amber 49 10%<br />
Red 0 0%
D - Grangemouth<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 12 3%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 0 0%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 0 0%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 12 3%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 0 0%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 12 3%<br />
Amber 0 0%<br />
Red 0 0%<br />
E - Polmont & Rural South<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 18 4%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 76 16%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 60 13%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 18 4%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 74 16%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 18 4%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 39 8%<br />
Amber 55 12%<br />
Red 0 0%
F - Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural North<br />
Units % of SHIP<br />
programme<br />
LAND OWNERSHIP<br />
Land Owned by RSL's 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Local Authority 0 0%<br />
Land Owned by Private Developer (under negotiation) 45 10%<br />
Land Owned by Private Owner (under negotiation) 40 8%<br />
Land Owned by Public Body (under negotiation) 0 0%<br />
Land not under negotiation / discussion 0 0%<br />
S75 / PLANNING NEGOTIATION<br />
Agreed or Advanced Stage 45 10%<br />
Not Begun or Very Early Stage 40 8%<br />
EFFECTIVE LAND SUPPLY<br />
Sites within effective supply 45 10%<br />
Sites outwith effective supply 40 8%<br />
Development Constraints<br />
Top 2 Development Constraints<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Land Ownership Issues<br />
Development Status<br />
Green 0 0%<br />
Amber 85 18%<br />
Red 0 0%
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Summary 3 - Total Programme funding Proposals<br />
Contribution Funding<br />
Funding Source Total per SHIP Contribution as<br />
Contribution unit % of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 25.598 0.054 46%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 25.598 0.054 46%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 17.197 0.036 31%<br />
Reserves 0.070 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 17.267 0.037 31%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.800 0.002 1%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 8.089 0.017 15%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 8.889 0.019 16%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.563 0.001 1%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.563 0.001 1%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 3.180 0.007 6%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 3.180 0.007 6%<br />
Total Total Total Cost<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
TOTAL SHIP PROGRAMME 472 55.497 0.118<br />
Includes RSL Adaptations 1.028<br />
£0.000m<br />
ANTICIPATED AHIP ALLOCATION 2011 - 2016 22.033<br />
SHIP AHIP REQUIREMENT 2011 - 2016 25.598<br />
VARIANCE 3.565 16%
Summary 3 - Sub Area funding Proposals<br />
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
A - Bo'ness unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 0.172 0.007 6%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 0.172 0.007 6%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Reserves 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.150 0.006 5%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 1.850 0.077 67%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 2.000 0.083 72%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 0.600 0.025 22%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 0.600 0.025 22%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
A - Bo'ness 24 2.772 0.115<br />
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
B - Denny & Bonnybridge unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 6.463 0.068 56%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 6.463 0.068 56%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 5.014 0.053 44%<br />
Reserves 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 5.014 0.053 44%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
B - Denny & Bonnybridge 95 11.477 0.121
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
C - <strong>Falkirk</strong> unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 5.941 0.037 33%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 5.941 0.037 33%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 3.571 0.022 20%<br />
Reserves 0.044 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 3.615 0.022 20%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.500 0.003 3%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 5.443 0.034 31%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 5.943 0.037 33%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 2.280 0.014 13%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 2.280 0.014 13%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
C - <strong>Falkirk</strong> 162 17.779 0.110<br />
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
D - Grangemouth unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 0.172 0.014 12%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 0.172 0.014 12%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Reserves 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.150 0.013 11%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 0.796 0.066 56%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 0.946 0.079 67%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 0.300 0.025 21%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 0.300 0.025 21%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
D - Grangemouth 12 1.418 0.118
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
E - Polmont & Rural South unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 7.027 0.000 0%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 7.027 0.075 60%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 4.039 0.043 35%<br />
Reserves 0.026 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 4.065 0.043 35%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.563 0.006 5%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.563 0.006 5%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
E - Polmont & Rural South 94 11.655 0.124<br />
Total Contribution Total<br />
Funding Source Cost per SHIP Funding as %<br />
F - Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural North unit of SHIP<br />
£0.000m £0.000m programme<br />
AHIP<br />
CORE 5.824 0.069 56%<br />
COP 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
LSVT 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - CBHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Glasgow - GHA Reprov 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
AHIP Total 5.824 0.069 56%<br />
RSL<br />
Private Finance 4.573 0.054 44%<br />
Reserves 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
RSL Total 4.573 0.054 44%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Tax 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Cash / Land 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Prudential Borrowing 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Buyer's Mortgage 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Funding Sources<br />
Public funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Private funding 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Other Total 0.000 0.000 0%<br />
Total Total<br />
Units Programme per unit<br />
£0.000m £0.000m<br />
F - Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural No 85 10.396 0.122
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> SHIP 2011 - 2016<br />
Table 1 a) Sub Area Reference Codes<br />
Sub Area Name SHIP Reference<br />
Bo'ness A<br />
Denny & Bonnybridge B<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> C<br />
Grangemouth D<br />
Polmont & Rural South E<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural North F
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 1 b) Years 2011/16 - <strong>Housing</strong> Need as per the local housing strategy or agreed update, by sub area, type and tenure.<br />
Target Type - Target No of Units Tenure - Target No of Units<br />
Sub Area no of General Specialist TOTAL Intermediate Affordable<br />
TOTAL<br />
Affordable Rent<br />
Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Glasgow Glasgow<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
Units Needs Provision RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other RSL LA Private Rent RSL LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS<br />
Local Authority Area 725 725 725 -725<br />
A - Bo'ness 95 95 95 -95<br />
B - Denny & Bonnybridge 210 210 210 -210<br />
C - <strong>Falkirk</strong> -95 -95 -95 95<br />
D - Grangemouth -280 -280 -280 280<br />
E - Polmont & Rural South 332 332 332 -332<br />
F - Stenhousemuir/ Larbert & Rural North 463 463 463 -463<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Total Local Authority 725 725 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -725<br />
Total Sub Areas 725 725 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -725
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 1 c) AHIP Allocation<br />
SHIP Programme Anticipated AHIP Allocation<br />
£0.00m<br />
11/12 - 15/16 22.033
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 2 a) YEAR 2011/12<br />
Type - No of Units Tenure - No of Units<br />
Project Address Total<br />
Sub Unit Intermediate Affordable<br />
TENURE<br />
Affordable Rent Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Area Nos General Special Type Glasgow Glasgow Private TOTAL<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
TOTAL RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other RSL LA Rent RSL LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS<br />
1.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 2 - Link F 27 25 2 27 27<br />
1.02 Overton Crescent, Redding Phase 2 - Kingdom E 21 15 6 21 21<br />
1.03 Park Terrace, Brightons - Link E 16 14 2 16 16 16<br />
1.04 Mary Street, Lauriston - Key E 2 0 2 2 2 2<br />
1.05 Chisholm Place, Grangemouth - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> D 12 12 0 12 12 12<br />
1.06 Shiel Gardens, Langlees - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 20 20 0 20 20 20<br />
1.07 Chequers, Hallglen - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 18 18 0 18 18 18<br />
1.08 Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 36 36 0 36 36 36<br />
1.09 Carron Road/ Millflat Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 10 10 0 10 10 10<br />
1.10 Cadzow Avenue, Bo'ness - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> A 24 24 0 24 24 24<br />
1.11 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
1.12 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
1.13 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
1.14 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
1.15 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
1.16 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
1.17 0 0<br />
1.18 0 0<br />
1.19 0 0<br />
1.20 0 0<br />
1.21 0 0<br />
1.22 0 0<br />
1.23 0 0<br />
1.24 0 0<br />
1.25 0 0<br />
1.26 0 0<br />
1.27 0 0<br />
1.28 0 0<br />
1.29 0 0<br />
1.30 0 0<br />
1.31 0 0<br />
1.32 0 0<br />
1.33 0 0<br />
1.34 0 0<br />
1.35 0 0<br />
1.36 0 0<br />
1.37 0 0<br />
1.38 0 0<br />
1.39 0 0<br />
1.40 0 0<br />
1.41 0 0<br />
1.42 0 0<br />
1.43 0 0<br />
1.44 0 0<br />
1.45 0 0<br />
1.46 0 0<br />
1.47 0 0<br />
1.48 0 0<br />
1.49 0 0<br />
1.50 0 0<br />
1.51 0 0<br />
1.52 0 0<br />
1.53 0 0<br />
1.54 0 0<br />
1.55 0 0<br />
1.56 0 0<br />
1.57 0 0<br />
1.58 0 0<br />
1.59 0 0<br />
TOTALS 186 174 12 186 39 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 186
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 2 b) YEAR 2012/13<br />
Type - No of Units Tenure - No of Units<br />
Project Address Total<br />
Sub Unit Intermediate Affordable<br />
TENURE<br />
Affordable Rent Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Area Nos General Special Type Glasgow Glasgow Private TOTAL<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
TOTAL RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other RSL LA Rent RSL LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS<br />
2.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 3 - Link F 18 16 2 18 18<br />
2.02 Overton, Redding Phase 3 - Kingdom E 23 18 5 13 10 23<br />
2.03 Glenburn Road, Hallglen - Loretto C 25 18 7 25 25 25<br />
2.04 Burnside Terrace, Camelon - Key C 4 4 0 4 4 4<br />
2.05 RSLAdaptations A 0 0<br />
2.06 RSLAdaptations B 0 0<br />
2.07 RSLAdaptations C 0 0<br />
2.08 RSLAdaptations D 0 0<br />
2.09 RSLAdaptations E 0 0<br />
2.10 RSLAdaptations F 0 0<br />
2.11 0 0<br />
2.12 0 0<br />
2.13 0 0<br />
2.14 0 0<br />
2.15 0 0<br />
2.16 0 0<br />
2.17 0 0<br />
2.18 0 0<br />
2.19 0 0<br />
2.20 0 0<br />
2.21 0 0<br />
2.22 0 0<br />
2.23 0 0<br />
2.24 0 0<br />
2.25 0 0<br />
2.26 0 0<br />
2.27 0 0<br />
2.28 0 0<br />
2.29 0 0<br />
2.30 0 0<br />
2.31 0 0<br />
2.32 0 0<br />
2.33 0 0<br />
2.34 0 0<br />
2.35 0 0<br />
2.36 0 0<br />
2.37 0 0<br />
2.38 0 0<br />
2.39 0 0<br />
2.40 0 0<br />
2.41 0 0<br />
2.42 0 0<br />
2.43 0 0<br />
2.44 0 0<br />
2.45 0 0<br />
2.46 0 0<br />
2.47 0 0<br />
2.48 0 0<br />
2.49 0 0<br />
2.50 0 0<br />
2.51 0 0<br />
2.52 0 0<br />
2.53 0 0<br />
2.54 0 0<br />
2.55 0 0<br />
2.56 0 0<br />
2.57 0 0<br />
2.58 0 0<br />
2.59 0 0<br />
TOTALS 70 56 14 70 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 70
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 2 c) YEAR 2013/14<br />
Type - No of Units Tenure - No of Units<br />
Project Address Total<br />
Sub Unit Intermediate Affordable<br />
TENURE<br />
Affordable Rent Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Area Nos General Special Type Glasgow Glasgow Private TOTAL<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
TOTAL RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other RSL LA Rent RSL LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS<br />
3.01 Auchincloch, Banknock - Link B 30 28 2 30 30 30<br />
3.02 Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood - Link B 27 25 2 27 27 27<br />
3.03 Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - Hanover C 27 27 0 27 27 27<br />
3.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
3.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
3.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
3.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
3.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
3.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
3.10 0 0<br />
3.11 0 0<br />
3.12 0 0<br />
3.13 0 0<br />
3.14 0 0<br />
3.15 0 0<br />
3.16 0 0<br />
3.17 0 0<br />
3.18 0 0<br />
3.19 0 0<br />
3.20 0 0<br />
3.21 0 0<br />
3.22 0 0<br />
3.23 0 0<br />
3.24 0 0<br />
3.25 0 0<br />
3.26 0 0<br />
3.27 0 0<br />
3.28 0 0<br />
3.29 0 0<br />
3.30 0 0<br />
3.31 0 0<br />
3.32 0 0<br />
3.33 0 0<br />
3.34 0 0<br />
3.35 0 0<br />
3.36 0 0<br />
3.37 0 0<br />
3.38 0 0<br />
3.39 0 0<br />
3.40 0 0<br />
3.41 0 0<br />
3.42 0 0<br />
3.43 0 0<br />
3.44 0 0<br />
3.45 0 0<br />
3.46 0 0<br />
3.47 0 0<br />
3.48 0 0<br />
3.49 0 0<br />
3.50 0 0<br />
3.51 0 0<br />
3.52 0 0<br />
3.53 0 0<br />
3.54 0 0<br />
3.55 0 0<br />
3.56 0 0<br />
3.57 0 0<br />
3.58 0 0<br />
3.59 0 0<br />
TOTALS 84 80 4 84 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 2 d) YEAR 2014/15<br />
Type - No of Units Tenure - No of Units<br />
Project Address Total<br />
Sub Unit Intermediate Affordable<br />
TENURE<br />
Affordable Rent Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Area Nos General Special Type Glasgow Glasgow RSL LA Private RSL LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS TOTAL<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
TOTAL RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other Rent<br />
4.01 Canal Walk, Bonnybridge - Link B 38 36 2 38 38 38<br />
4.02 Vellore Road, Maddiston - Link E 18 16 2 18 18 18<br />
4.03 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
4.04 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
4.05 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
4.06 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
4.07 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
4.08 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
4.09 0 0<br />
4.10 0 0<br />
4.11 0 0<br />
4.12 0 0<br />
4.13 0 0<br />
4.14 0 0<br />
4.15 0 0<br />
4.16 0 0<br />
4.17 0 0<br />
4.18 0 0<br />
4.19 0 0<br />
4.20 0 0<br />
4.21 0 0<br />
4.22 0 0<br />
4.23 0 0<br />
4.24 0 0<br />
4.25 0 0<br />
4.26 0 0<br />
4.27 0 0<br />
4.28 0 0<br />
4.29 0 0<br />
4.30 0 0<br />
4.31 0 0<br />
4.32 0 0<br />
4.33 0 0<br />
4.34 0 0<br />
4.35 0 0<br />
4.36 0 0<br />
4.37 0 0<br />
4.38 0 0<br />
4.39 0 0<br />
4.40 0 0<br />
4.41 0 0<br />
4.42 0 0<br />
4.43 0 0<br />
4.44 0 0<br />
4.45 0 0<br />
4.46 0 0<br />
4.47 0 0<br />
4.48 0 0<br />
4.49 0 0<br />
4.50 0 0<br />
4.51 0 0<br />
4.52 0 0<br />
4.53 0 0<br />
4.54 0 0<br />
4.55 0 0<br />
4.56 0 0<br />
4.57 0 0<br />
4.58 0 0<br />
4.59 0 0<br />
TOTALS 56 52 4 56 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 2 e) YEAR 2015/16<br />
Type - No of Units Tenure - No of Units<br />
Project Address Total<br />
Sub Unit Intermediate Affordable<br />
TENURE<br />
Affordable Rent Mid Rent NSSE LCHO<br />
Area Nos General Special Type Glasgow Glasgow Private TOTAL<br />
CBHA GHA<br />
TOTAL RSL LSVT Reprov Reprov LA Other RSL LA Rent RSl LA PS OMSEP RSL LA PS<br />
5.01 Westquarter Social Club - Hanover E 14 8 6 14 14 14<br />
5.02 Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Phase 1 - Wes C 22 22 0 22 22 22<br />
5.03 Edward Avenue, Larbert - Link F 40 38 2 40 25 15 40<br />
5.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
5.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
5.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
5.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
5.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
5.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
5.10 0 0<br />
5.11 0 0<br />
5.12 0 0<br />
5.13 0 0<br />
5.14 0 0<br />
5.15 0 0<br />
5.16 0 0<br />
5.17 0 0<br />
5.18 0 0<br />
5.19 0 0<br />
5.20 0 0<br />
5.21 0 0<br />
5.22 0 0<br />
5.23 0 0<br />
5.24 0 0<br />
5.25 0 0<br />
5.26 0 0<br />
5.27 0 0<br />
5.28 0 0<br />
5.29 0 0<br />
5.30 0 0<br />
5.31 0 0<br />
5.32 0 0<br />
5.33 0 0<br />
5.34 0 0<br />
5.35 0 0<br />
5.36 0 0<br />
5.37 0 0<br />
5.38 0 0<br />
5.39 0 0<br />
5.40 0 0<br />
5.41 0 0<br />
5.42 0 0<br />
5.43 0 0<br />
5.44 0 0<br />
5.45 0 0<br />
5.46 0 0<br />
5.47 0 0<br />
5.48 0 0<br />
5.49 0 0<br />
5.50 0 0<br />
5.51 0 0<br />
5.52 0 0<br />
5.53 0 0<br />
5.54 0 0<br />
5.55 0 0<br />
5.56 0 0<br />
5.57 0 0<br />
5.58 0 0<br />
5.59 0 0<br />
TOTALS 76 68 8 76 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 76
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 3 a) YEAR 2011/12<br />
Units proposed<br />
Site<br />
Development<br />
Ownership of Land<br />
through Effective Land<br />
Development<br />
Status<br />
Project Address Total (input no of units)<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning System Supply<br />
Constraints<br />
* Green<br />
Sub Unit eg Section 75 (input no of units) Primary Constraint Secondary Constraint * Amber<br />
Area Nos Agreed Not Begun Description Description Comment * Red<br />
RSL LA Private Private Public TOTAL or Advanced or Very (use pull down list) (use pull down list)<br />
Developer Owner Body Other units Stage Early Stage YES NO<br />
1.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 2 - Link F 27 27 27 27 27 Land Ownership Issues Consortium Agreement with NHS Amber<br />
1.02 Overton Crescent, Redding Phase 2 - Kingdom E 21 21 21 21 21 Green<br />
1.03 Park Terrace, Brightons - Link E 16 16 16 16 16 Green<br />
1.04 Mary Street, Lauriston - Key E 2 2 2 Reconfiguration of property Green<br />
1.05 Chisholm Place, Grangemouth - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> D 12 12 12 12 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Ground Contamination Green<br />
1.06 Shiel Gardens, Langlees - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 20 20 20 20 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Infrastructure - Scottish Water Await consent from Scottish Water Green<br />
1.07 Chequers, Hallglen - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 18 18 18 18 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Network Rail issues Green<br />
1.08 Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 36 36 36 36 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Green<br />
1.09 Carron Road/ Millflat Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 10 10 10 10 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Green<br />
1.10 Cadzow Avenue, Bo'ness - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> A 24 24 24 24 <strong>Plan</strong>ning <strong>Plan</strong>ning application submitted Green<br />
1.11 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
1.12 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
1.13 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
1.14 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
1.15 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
1.16 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
1.17 0 0 0 0<br />
1.18 0 0 0 0<br />
1.19 0 0 0 0<br />
1.20 0 0 0 0<br />
1.21 0 0 0 0<br />
1.22 0 0 0 0<br />
1.23 0 0 0 0<br />
1.24 0 0 0 0<br />
1.25 0 0 0 0<br />
1.26 0 0 0 0<br />
1.27 0 0 0 0<br />
1.28 0 0 0 0<br />
1.29 0 0 0 0<br />
1.30 0 0 0 0<br />
1.31 0 0 0 0<br />
1.32 0 0 0 0<br />
1.33 0 0 0 0<br />
1.34 0 0 0 0<br />
1.35 0 0 0 0<br />
1.36 0 0 0 0<br />
1.37 0 0 0 0<br />
1.38 0 0 0 0<br />
1.39 0 0 0 0<br />
1.40 0 0 0 0<br />
1.41 0 0 0 0<br />
1.42 0 0 0 0<br />
1.43 0 0 0 0<br />
1.44 0 0 0 0<br />
1.45 0 0 0 0<br />
1.46 0 0 0 0<br />
1.47 0 0 0 0<br />
1.48 0 0 0 0<br />
1.49 0 0 0 0<br />
1.50 0 0 0 0<br />
1.51 0 0 0 0<br />
1.52 0 0 0 0<br />
1.53 0 0 0 0<br />
1.54 0 0 0 0<br />
1.55 0 0 0 0<br />
1.56 0 0 0 0<br />
1.57 0 0 0 0<br />
1.58 0 0 0 0<br />
1.59 0 0 0 0<br />
TOTALS 186 18 120 48 0 0 0 186 64 0 184 0
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 3 b) YEAR 2012/13<br />
Units proposed<br />
Site<br />
Development<br />
Ownership of Land through Effective Land<br />
Development<br />
Status<br />
Project Address Total (input no of units) <strong>Plan</strong>ning System Supply<br />
Constraints<br />
* Green<br />
Sub Unit eg Section 75 (input no of units) Primary Constraint Secondary Constraint * Amber<br />
Area Nos Agreed Not Begun Description Description Comment * Red<br />
RSL LA Private Private Public TOTAL or Advanced or Very (use pull down list) (use pull down list)<br />
Developer Owner Body Other units Stage Early Stage YES NO<br />
2.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 3 - Link F 18 18 18 18 18 Consortium agreement with NHS Amber<br />
2.02 Overton, Redding Phase 3 - Kingdom E 23 23 23 23 23<br />
Social Work Services to confirm<br />
supported accommodation<br />
Amber<br />
2.03 Glenburn Road, Hallglen - Loretto C 25 25 25 25 <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
requirements. <strong>Housing</strong> mix to be<br />
confirmed. Site previously obtained<br />
planning for residential units.<br />
Green<br />
2.04 Burnside Terrace, Camelon - Key C 4 4 4 4 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Reconfiguration of property Green<br />
2.05 RSLAdaptations A 0 0<br />
2.06 RSLAdaptations B 0 0<br />
2.07 RSLAdaptations C 0 0<br />
2.08 RSLAdaptations D 0 0<br />
2.09 RSLAdaptations E 0 0<br />
2.10 RSLAdaptations F 0 0<br />
2.11 0 0 0 0<br />
2.12 0 0 0 0<br />
2.13 0 0 0 0<br />
2.14 0 0 0 0<br />
2.15 0 0 0 0<br />
2.16 0 0 0 0<br />
2.17 0 0 0 0<br />
2.18 0 0 0 0<br />
2.19 0 0 0 0<br />
2.20 0 0 0 0<br />
2.21 0 0 0 0<br />
2.22 0 0 0 0<br />
2.23 0 0 0 0<br />
2.24 0 0 0 0<br />
2.25 0 0 0 0<br />
2.26 0 0 0 0<br />
2.27 0 0 0 0<br />
2.28 0 0 0 0<br />
2.29 0 0 0 0<br />
2.30 0 0 0 0<br />
2.31 0 0 0 0<br />
2.32 0 0 0 0<br />
2.33 0 0 0 0<br />
2.34 0 0 0 0<br />
2.35 0 0 0 0<br />
2.36 0 0 0 0<br />
2.37 0 0 0 0<br />
2.38 0 0 0 0<br />
2.39 0 0 0 0<br />
2.40 0 0 0 0<br />
2.41 0 0 0 0<br />
2.42 0 0 0 0<br />
2.43 0 0 0 0<br />
2.44 0 0 0 0<br />
2.45 0 0 0 0<br />
2.46 0 0 0 0<br />
2.47 0 0 0 0<br />
2.48 0 0 0 0<br />
2.49 0 0 0 0<br />
2.50 0 0 0 0<br />
2.51 0 0 0 0<br />
2.52 0 0 0 0<br />
2.53 0 0 0 0<br />
2.54 0 0 0 0<br />
2.55 0 0 0 0<br />
2.56 0 0 0 0<br />
2.57 0 0 0 0<br />
2.58 0 0 0 0<br />
2.59 0 0 0 0<br />
TOTALS 70 4 25 41 0 0 0 70 41 0 70 0
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 3 c) YEAR 2013/14<br />
Units proposed<br />
Site<br />
Development<br />
Ownership of Land through Effective Land<br />
Development<br />
Status<br />
Project Address Total (input no of units) <strong>Plan</strong>ning System Supply<br />
Constraints<br />
* Green<br />
Sub Unit eg Section 75 (input no of units)<br />
Primary Constraint Secondary Constraint * Amber<br />
Area Nos Agreed Not Begun Description Description Comment * Red<br />
RSL LA Private Private Public TOTAL or Advanced or Very (use pull down list) (use pull down list)<br />
Developer Owner Body Other units Stage Early Stage YES NO<br />
3.01 Auchincloch, Banknock - Link B 30 30 30 30 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Amber<br />
3.02 Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood - Link B 27 27 27 27 27 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Developer changing layout Amber<br />
3.03 Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - Hanover C 27 27 27 27 Need owner to agree price Amber<br />
3.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
3.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
3.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
3.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
3.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
3.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
3.10 0 0 0 0<br />
3.11 0 0 0 0<br />
3.12 0 0 0 0<br />
3.13 0 0 0 0<br />
3.14 0 0 0 0<br />
3.15 0 0 0 0<br />
3.16 0 0 0 0<br />
3.17 0 0 0 0<br />
3.18 0 0 0 0<br />
3.19 0 0 0 0<br />
3.20 0 0 0 0<br />
3.21 0 0 0 0<br />
3.22 0 0 0 0<br />
3.23 0 0 0 0<br />
3.24 0 0 0 0<br />
3.25 0 0 0 0<br />
3.26 0 0 0 0<br />
3.27 0 0 0 0<br />
3.28 0 0 0 0<br />
3.29 0 0 0 0<br />
3.30 0 0 0 0<br />
3.31 0 0 0 0<br />
3.32 0 0 0 0<br />
3.33 0 0 0 0<br />
3.34 0 0 0 0<br />
3.35 0 0 0 0<br />
3.36 0 0 0 0<br />
3.37 0 0 0 0<br />
3.38 0 0 0 0<br />
3.39 0 0 0 0<br />
3.40 0 0 0 0<br />
3.41 0 0 0 0<br />
3.42 0 0 0 0<br />
3.43 0 0 0 0<br />
3.44 0 0 0 0<br />
3.45 0 0 0 0<br />
3.46 0 0 0 0<br />
3.47 0 0 0 0<br />
3.48 0 0 0 0<br />
3.49 0 0 0 0<br />
3.50 0 0 0 0<br />
3.51 0 0 0 0<br />
3.52 0 0 0 0<br />
3.53 0 0 0 0<br />
3.54 0 0 0 0<br />
3.55 0 0 0 0<br />
3.56 0 0 0 0<br />
3.57 0 0 0 0<br />
3.58 0 0 0 0<br />
3.59 0 0 0 0<br />
TOTALS 84 0 30 0 54 0 0 84 27 0 84 0
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 3 d) YEAR 2014/15<br />
Units proposed<br />
Site<br />
Development<br />
Ownership of Land through Effective Land<br />
Development<br />
Status<br />
Project Address Total (input no of units) <strong>Plan</strong>ning System Supply<br />
Constraints<br />
* Green<br />
Sub Unit eg Section 75 (input no of units)<br />
Primary Constraint Secondary Constraint * Amber<br />
Area Nos Agreed Not Begun Description Description Comment * Red<br />
RSL LA Private Private Public TOTAL or Advanced or Very (use pull down list) (use pull down list)<br />
Developer Owner Body Other units Stage Early Stage YES NO<br />
4.01 Canal Walk, Bonnybridge - Link B 38 38 38 38 38 No know constraints Green<br />
4.02 Vellore Road, Maddiston - Link E 18 18 18 18 18 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Land Ownership Issues Feasibility Stage Amber<br />
4.03 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
4.04 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
4.05 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
4.06 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
4.07 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
4.08 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
4.09 0 0 0 0<br />
4.10 0 0 0 0<br />
4.11 0 0 0 0<br />
4.12 0 0 0 0<br />
4.13 0 0 0 0<br />
4.14 0 0 0 0<br />
4.15 0 0 0 0<br />
4.16 0 0 0 0<br />
4.17 0 0 0 0<br />
4.18 0 0 0 0<br />
4.19 0 0 0 0<br />
4.20 0 0 0 0<br />
4.21 0 0 0 0<br />
4.22 0 0 0 0<br />
4.23 0 0 0 0<br />
4.24 0 0 0 0<br />
4.25 0 0 0 0<br />
4.26 0 0 0 0<br />
4.27 0 0 0 0<br />
4.28 0 0 0 0<br />
4.29 0 0 0 0<br />
4.30 0 0 0 0<br />
4.31 0 0 0 0<br />
4.32 0 0 0 0<br />
4.33 0 0 0 0<br />
4.34 0 0 0 0<br />
4.35 0 0 0 0<br />
4.36 0 0 0 0<br />
4.37 0 0 0 0<br />
4.38 0 0 0 0<br />
4.39 0 0 0 0<br />
4.40 0 0 0 0<br />
4.41 0 0 0 0<br />
4.42 0 0 0 0<br />
4.43 0 0 0 0<br />
4.44 0 0 0 0<br />
4.45 0 0 0 0<br />
4.46 0 0 0 0<br />
4.47 0 0 0 0<br />
4.48 0 0 0 0<br />
4.49 0 0 0 0<br />
4.50 0 0 0 0<br />
4.51 0 0 0 0<br />
4.52 0 0 0 0<br />
4.53 0 0 0 0<br />
4.54 0 0 0 0<br />
4.55 0 0 0 0<br />
4.56 0 0 0 0<br />
4.57 0 0 0 0<br />
4.58 0 0 0 0<br />
4.59 0 0 0 0<br />
TOTALS 56 38 0 18 0 0 0 56 38 18 38 18
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 3 e) YEAR 2015/16<br />
Units proposed<br />
Site<br />
Development<br />
Ownership of Land through Effective Land<br />
Development<br />
Status<br />
Project Address Total (input no of units) <strong>Plan</strong>ning System Supply<br />
Constraints<br />
* Green<br />
Sub Unit eg Section 75 (input no of units) Primary Constraint Secondary Constraint * Amber<br />
Area Nos Agreed Not Begun Description Description Comment * Red<br />
RSL LA Private Private Public TOTAL or Advanced or Very (use pull down list) (use pull down list)<br />
Developer Owner Body Other units Stage Early Stage YES NO<br />
5.01 Westquarter Social Club - Hanover E 14 14 14 14 Land Ownership Issues<br />
The existing social club has outline<br />
planning , early discussions with owner<br />
who wishes to sell. Note of interest<br />
Amber<br />
lodged with agent. Awaiting valuation of<br />
site. Desktop survey completed and no<br />
major issues identified.<br />
Prepared to front fund acquisition in<br />
5.02 Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Phase 1 - WesC 22 22 22 22 22 <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11. Require to conclude section 69 Amber<br />
agreement.<br />
5.03 Edward Avenue, Larbert - Link F 40 40 40 40 40 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Amber<br />
5.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0<br />
5.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0<br />
5.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0<br />
5.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0<br />
5.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0<br />
5.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0<br />
5.10 0 0 0 0<br />
5.11 0 0 0 0<br />
5.12 0 0 0 0<br />
5.13 0 0 0 0<br />
5.14 0 0 0 0<br />
5.15 0 0 0 0<br />
5.16 0 0 0 0<br />
5.17 0 0 0 0<br />
5.18 0 0 0 0<br />
5.19 0 0 0 0<br />
5.20 0 0 0 0<br />
5.21 0 0 0 0<br />
5.22 0 0 0 0<br />
5.23 0 0 0 0<br />
5.24 0 0 0 0<br />
5.25 0 0 0 0<br />
5.26 0 0 0 0<br />
5.27 0 0 0 0<br />
5.28 0 0 0 0<br />
5.29 0 0 0 0<br />
5.30 0 0 0 0<br />
5.31 0 0 0 0<br />
5.32 0 0 0 0<br />
5.33 0 0 0 0<br />
5.34 0 0 0 0<br />
5.35 0 0 0 0<br />
5.36 0 0 0 0<br />
5.37 0 0 0 0<br />
5.38 0 0 0 0<br />
5.39 0 0 0 0<br />
5.40 0 0 0 0<br />
5.41 0 0 0 0<br />
5.42 0 0 0 0<br />
5.43 0 0 0 0<br />
5.44 0 0 0 0<br />
5.45 0 0 0 0<br />
5.46 0 0 0 0<br />
5.47 0 0 0 0<br />
5.48 0 0 0 0<br />
5.49 0 0 0 0<br />
5.50 0 0 0 0<br />
5.51 0 0 0 0<br />
5.52 0 0 0 0<br />
5.53 0 0 0 0<br />
5.54 0 0 0 0<br />
5.55 0 0 0 0<br />
5.56 0 0 0 0<br />
5.57 0 0 0 0<br />
5.58 0 0 0 0<br />
5.59 0 0 0 0<br />
TOTALS 76 0 0 14 62 0 0 76 22 40 36 40
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 4 a) YEAR 2011/12<br />
AHIP RSL<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Contribution Other<br />
Total<br />
Buyer's Funds<br />
Project<br />
Project Address Total £0.000m<br />
£0.000m<br />
£0.000m Mortgage £0.000m Cost<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos CORE COP LSVT Glasgow Glasgow Other TOTAL PF Res Other Total <strong>Council</strong> Cash / Prudential Other (eg Total<br />
CBHA GHA Tax Land Borrowing Commuted Public Private TOTAL<br />
Reprov Reprov value Sum) £0.000m £0.000m<br />
1.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 2 - Link F 27 1.795 1.795 1.580 1.580 0.000 0.000 3.375<br />
1.02 Overton Crescent, Redding Phase 2 - Kingdom E 21 1.654 1.654 0.971 0.971 0.000 0.000 2.625<br />
1.03 Park Terrace, Brightons - Link E 16 1.064 1.064 0.816 0.816 0.000 0.000 1.880<br />
1.04 Mary Street, Lauriston - Key E 2 0.116 0.116 0.090 0.026 0.116 0.000 0.000 0.232<br />
1.05 Chisholm Place, Grangemouth - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> D 12 0.000 0.000 0.150 0.796 0.946 0.300 0.300 1.246<br />
1.06 Shiel Gardens, Langlees - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 20 0.000 0.000 0.150 1.200 1.350 0.500 0.500 1.850<br />
1.07 Chequers, Hallglen - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 18 0.000 0.000 0.100 1.131 1.231 0.450 0.450 1.681<br />
1.08 Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 36 0.000 0.000 0.150 1.937 2.087 1.080 1.080 3.167<br />
1.09 Carron Road/ Millflat Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 10 0.000 0.000 0.100 1.175 1.275 0.250 0.250 1.525<br />
1.10 Cadzow Avenue, Bo'ness - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> A 24 0.000 0.000 0.150 1.850 2.000 0.600 0.600 2.600<br />
1.11 RSL Adaptations A 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.12 RSL Adaptations B 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.13 RSL Adaptations C 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.14 RSL Adaptations D 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.15 RSL Adaptations E 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.16 RSL Adaptations F 0 0.039 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039<br />
1.17 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.18 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.19 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.20 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.21 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.22 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.23 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.24 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.25 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.26 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.27 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.28 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.29 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.31 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.32 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.33 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.34 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.35 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.36 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.37 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.38 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.39 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.40 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.41 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.42 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.43 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.44 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.45 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.46 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.47 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.48 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.49 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.50 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.51 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.52 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.53 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.54 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.55 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.56 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.57 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.58 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
1.59 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
TOTALS 186 4.863 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.863 3.457 0.026 0.000 3.483 0.000 0.800 8.089 0.000 8.889 0.000 3.180 0.000 3.180 20.415
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 4 b) YEAR 2012/13<br />
AHIP RSL <strong>Council</strong> Contribution Other<br />
Total<br />
Buyer's Funds<br />
Project<br />
Project Address Total £0.000m<br />
£0.000m<br />
£0.000m Mortgage £0.000m Cost<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos CORE COP LSVT Glasgow Glasgow Other TOTAL PF Res Other Total <strong>Council</strong> Cash / Prudential Other Total<br />
CBHA GHA Tax Land Borrowing Public Private TOTAL<br />
Reprov Reprov value £0.000m £0.000m<br />
2.01 Bellsdyke Road, Larbert Phase 3 - Link F 18 1.197 1.197 1.053 1.053 0.000 0.000 2.250<br />
2.02 Overton, Redding Phase 3 - Kingdom E 23 1.524 1.524 0.789 0.789 0.000 0.563 0.000 2.876<br />
2.03 Glenburn Road, Hallglen - Loretto C 25 2.080 2.080 1.120 1.120 0.000 0.000 3.200<br />
2.04 Burnside Terrace, Camelon - Key C 4 0.220 0.220 0.176 0.044 0.220 0.000 0.000 0.440<br />
2.05 RSLAdaptations A 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.06 RSLAdaptations B 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.07 RSLAdaptations C 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.08 RSLAdaptations D 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.09 RSLAdaptations E 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.10 RSLAdaptations F 0 0.036 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036<br />
2.11 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.12 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.13 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.14 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.15 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.16 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.17 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.18 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.19 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.20 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.21 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.22 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.23 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.24 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.25 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.26 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.27 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.28 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.29 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.31 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.32 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.33 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.34 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.35 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.36 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.37 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.38 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.39 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.40 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.41 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.42 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.43 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.44 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.45 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.46 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.47 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.48 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.49 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.50 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.51 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.52 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.53 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.54 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.55 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.56 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.57 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.58 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
2.59 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
TOTALS 70 5.240 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.240 3.138 0.044 0.000 3.182 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.563 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.985
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 4 c) YEAR 2013/14<br />
AHIP RSL <strong>Council</strong> Contribution Other<br />
Total<br />
Buyer's Funds<br />
Project<br />
Project Address Total £0.000m<br />
£0.000m<br />
£0.000m Mortgage £0.000m Cost<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos CORE COP LSVT Glasgow Glasgow Other TOTAL PF Res Other Total <strong>Council</strong> Cash / Prudential Other Total<br />
CBHA GHA Tax Land Borrowing Public Private TOTAL<br />
Reprov Reprov value £0.000m £0.000m<br />
3.01 Auchincloch, Banknock - Link B 30 1.995 1.995 1.455 1.455 0.000 0.000 3.450<br />
3.02 Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood - Link B 27 1.769 1.769 1.336 1.336 0.000 0.000 3.105<br />
3.03 Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - Hanover C 27 2.100 2.100 1.200 1.200 0.000 0.000 3.300<br />
3.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0.034 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.034<br />
3.10 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.11 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.12 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.13 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.14 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.15 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.16 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.17 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.18 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.19 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.20 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.21 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.22 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.23 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.24 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.25 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.26 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.27 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.28 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.29 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.31 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.32 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.33 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.34 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.35 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.36 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.37 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.38 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.39 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.40 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.41 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.42 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.43 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.44 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.45 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.46 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.47 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.48 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.49 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.50 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.51 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.52 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.53 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.54 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.55 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.56 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.57 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.58 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
3.59 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
TOTALS 84 6.067 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.067 3.991 0.000 0.000 3.991 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.058
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 4 d) YEAR 2014/15<br />
AHIP RSL <strong>Council</strong> Contribution Other<br />
Total<br />
Buyer's Funds<br />
Project<br />
Project Address Total £0.000m<br />
£0.000m<br />
£0.000m Mortgage £0.000m Cost<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos CORE COP LSVT Glasgow Glasgow Other TOTAL PF Res Other Total <strong>Council</strong> Cash / Prudential Other Total<br />
CBHA GHA Tax Land Borrowing Public Private TOTAL<br />
Reprov Reprov value £0.000m £0.000m<br />
4.01 Canal Walk, Bonnybridge - Link B 38 2.527 2.527 2.223 2.223 0.000 0.000 4.750<br />
4.02 Vellore Road, Maddiston - Link E 18 1.197 1.197 0.873 0.873 0.000 0.000 2.070<br />
4.03 RSL Adaptations A 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.04 RSL Adaptations B 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.05 RSL Adaptations C 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.06 RSL Adaptations D 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.07 RSL Adaptations E 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.08 RSL Adaptations F 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
4.09 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.10 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.11 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.12 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.13 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.14 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.15 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.16 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.17 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.18 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.19 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.20 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.21 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.22 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.23 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.24 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.25 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.26 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.27 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.28 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.29 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.31 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.32 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.33 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.34 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.35 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.36 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.37 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.38 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.39 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.40 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.41 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.42 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.43 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.44 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.45 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.46 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.47 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.48 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.49 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.50 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.51 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.52 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.53 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.54 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.55 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.56 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.57 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.58 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
4.59 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
TOTALS 56 3.912 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.912 3.096 0.000 0.000 3.096 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.008
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 4 e) YEAR 2015/16<br />
AHIP RSL <strong>Council</strong> Contribution Other<br />
Total<br />
Buyer's Funds<br />
Project<br />
Project Address Total £0.000m<br />
£0.000m<br />
£0.000m Mortgage £0.000m Cost<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos CORE COP LSVT Glasgow Glasgow Other TOTAL PF Res Other Total <strong>Council</strong> Cash / Prudential Other Total<br />
CBHA GHA Tax Land Borrowing Public Private TOTAL<br />
Reprov Reprov value £0.000m £0.000m<br />
5.01 Westquarter Social Club - Hanover E 14 1.300 1.300 0.500 0.500 0.000 0.000 1.800<br />
5.02 Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Phase 1 - WC 22 1.369 1.369 1.075 1.075 0.000 0.000 2.444<br />
5.03 Edward Avenue, Larbert - Link F 40 2.660 2.660 1.940 1.940 0.000 0.000 4.600<br />
5.04 RSL Adaptations A 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.05 RSL Adaptations B 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.06 RSL Adaptations C 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.07 RSL Adaptations D 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.08 RSL Adaptations E 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.09 RSL Adaptations F 0 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031<br />
5.10 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.11 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.12 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.13 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.14 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.15 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.16 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.17 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.18 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.19 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.20 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.21 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.22 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.23 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.24 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.25 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.26 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.27 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.28 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.29 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.31 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.32 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.33 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.34 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.35 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.36 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.37 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.38 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.39 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.40 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.41 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.42 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.43 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.44 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.45 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.46 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.47 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.48 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.49 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.50 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.51 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.52 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.53 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.54 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.55 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.56 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.57 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.58 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
5.59 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
TOTALS 76 5.517 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.517 3.515 0.000 0.000 3.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 9.032
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Table 5 <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme<br />
Draw Down of Central Government Funds<br />
Project Address Total<br />
£0.000m<br />
Sub Unit<br />
Area Nos 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Post<br />
SHIP<br />
Period<br />
TOTAL<br />
Chisholm Place, Grangemouth - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> D 12 0.300 0.300<br />
Shiel Gardens, Langlees - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 20 0.500 0.500<br />
Chequers, Hallglen - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> C 18 0.450 0.450<br />
Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> Coun C 36 0.540 0.540 1.080<br />
Carron Road/ Millflat Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - <strong>Falkirk</strong> Coun C 10 0.250 0.250<br />
Cadzow Avenue, Bo'ness - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> A 24 0.600 0.600<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
0.000<br />
TOTALS 120 2.640 0.540 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.180
Appendix 1b<br />
5 Year SHIP Programme
Priority<br />
Ranking<br />
PROJECT<br />
RSL/Partner Sub Area<br />
Area Surplus/<br />
Shortfall<br />
Rent<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Programme Appendix 1b<br />
Current Year<br />
Year 1 Year 2<br />
Year 3 Year 4 Year 5<br />
Future Years<br />
No. of Units<br />
Shared<br />
SO<br />
Equity<br />
<strong>2010</strong> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />
2016<br />
Total<br />
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J<br />
Number<br />
of Units<br />
J A<br />
FC HAG PF Other Total SOA L.H.S<br />
STRATEGIC LINKS<br />
SCP LP SP<br />
ON SITE DEVELOPMENTS/ BLOCK A<br />
OS<br />
*Mayfield Drive, Longcroft<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
*McTaggart Avenue, Denny<br />
Link<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 16 0 0 16 16 £0 £965,209 £732,914 £0 £1,698,123<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10<br />
OS<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Horizon<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 10 0 0 10<br />
10 £150,000 £785,155 £371,000 £0 £1,306,155<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10<br />
BLOCK B 20010 - 11<br />
BB<br />
*Bridge Street, Bonnybridge<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
*Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase1)<br />
Link<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 6 0 0 6 6 £0 £434,910 £298,146 £0 £733,056<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10<br />
BB<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural 93 22 0 0 22<br />
22 £0 £1,422,077 £1,350,875 £0 £2,772,952<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
*Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 1)<br />
North<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
BB<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Kingdom<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 28 0 0 28<br />
28 £0 £2,167,000 £1,363,000 £0 £3,530,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10<br />
BLOCK C 2011 - 16 SHIP<br />
1st =<br />
Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 2)<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural 93<br />
0 27 0 27<br />
27 £0 £1,795,500 £1,579,500 £0 £3,375,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3,4,<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Park Terrace, Brightons<br />
North<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
2nd =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Mary Street, Lauriston<br />
Link<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 16 0 0 16 16 £0 £1,064,000 £816,000 £0 £1,880,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10<br />
3rd<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
Remodelling Contract<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 2)<br />
Key<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67<br />
2 0 0 2<br />
2 £0 £116,000 £90,000 £26,000 £232,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
4th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 3)<br />
Kingdom<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 21 0 0 21 21 £0 £1,654,000 £971,000 £0 £2,625,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
1st =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural 93 18 0 0 18<br />
18 £0 £1,197,000 £1,053,000 £0 £2,250,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4 and 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Burnside Terrace, Camelon<br />
North<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
2nd =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Key <strong>Falkirk</strong> +19 4 0 0 4 4 £0 £220,000 £176,000 £44,000 £440,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
Remodelling Contract<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 3)<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
4th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Glenburn Road, Hallglen<br />
Kingdom<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 13 0 10 23<br />
23 £0 £1,524,000 £789,000 £563,000 £2,876,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
4th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Loretto <strong>Falkirk</strong> 73 25 0 0 25<br />
25 £0 £2,080,000 £1,120,000 £0 £3,200,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4 and 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Auchincloch, Banknock<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
5th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood<br />
Link<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 30 0 0 30<br />
30 £0 £1,995,000 £1,455,000 £0 £3,450,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
6th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Link<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 27 0 0 27 27 £0 £1,768,500 £1,336,500 £0 £3,105,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
6th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Hanover <strong>Falkirk</strong> +19 27 0 0 27 27 £0 £2,100,000 £1,200,000 £0 £3,300,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Canal Walk, Bonnybridge<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
7th<br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Vellore Road, Maddiston<br />
Link<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
42 38 0 0 38 38 £0 £2,527,000 £2,223,000 £0 £4,750,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5, Objective 15,<br />
8th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Westquarter Social Club, Westquarter<br />
Link<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 18 0 0 18<br />
18 £0 £1,197,000 £873,000 £0 £2,070,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
9th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
Revised CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 1)<br />
Hanover<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
67 14 0 0 14<br />
14 £0 £1,300,000 £500,000 £0 £1,800,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Weslo <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
+19 22 0 0 22 22 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £0 £2,445,037<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Edward Avenue, Larbert<br />
10<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural 93 25 15 0 40<br />
40 £0 £2,660,000 £1,940,000 £0 £4,600,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 2)<br />
North<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Weslo <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
+19 22 0 0 22<br />
22 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £0 £2,445,037<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 3,4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
5 Year<br />
11<br />
5 Year SHIP Total 300 42 10 352<br />
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16<br />
2016-17 SHIP<br />
Total<br />
£0 £24,567,220 £17,197,817 £633,000 £42,398,037<br />
Totals 404 42 10 456 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A Totals £150,000 £31,710,791 £22,389,569 £633,000 £54,883,360<br />
Unit Site Starts in Year<br />
66 70 84<br />
56<br />
76<br />
352<br />
OS On Site<br />
Estimated Tender Approval in Year<br />
66 70 84<br />
56<br />
76<br />
352<br />
BB Block B for <strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
Estimated Unit Completion in Year 50 86 107 56 76<br />
375 Legend<br />
Estimated Grant Funding Requirement in Year £5,369,714 £5,011,733<br />
£4,653,752 £4,295,771 £4,295,771 £2,097,970<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
* Not included in SHIP proformas as spend started prior to 2011/12<br />
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 20011-2016<br />
Tender Approval date<br />
Date on site<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 7<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image PO<br />
Sustainable communities SO housing growth<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities residential amenity Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Environmental quality SO environment and image Com 3, 4.2<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image PO<br />
Sustainable communities SO housing growth<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong><br />
growth, Residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image PO<br />
Sustainable communities SO housing growth<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong><br />
growth, Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong><br />
growth, Residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong><br />
growth, Residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image PO<br />
Sustainable communities SO housing growth<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong><br />
growth, Residential amenity<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.1<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
Com 3<br />
growth residential amenity
Appendix 1c<br />
5 Year SHIP Financial Profile
Priority<br />
Project Sub-Area RSL Partner Rent SE LCHO Total * RSL LA<br />
Ranking<br />
Private<br />
Dev.<br />
Private<br />
Owner<br />
Public<br />
Body<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Financial Profile Appendix 1c<br />
C *Thorndene Terrace, Slamannan Polmont & Rural South Hanover 20 0 0 20 Complete £500,814 £700,000 £599,186 £400,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,100,000 £1,100,000 £2,200,000 Not applicable Green<br />
C *Torwoodlea, Larbert<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert &<br />
Rural North<br />
Link 43 0 0 43 Complete £2,772,507 £1,661,108 £671,943 £134,970 £0 £86,134 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £3,444,450 £1,882,212 £5,326,662 Not applicable Green<br />
C *Wood Street, Grangemouth Grangemouth Link 46 11 16 73 Complete £5,761,714 £2,361,143 £169,205 £970,000 £0 £110,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £5,930,919 £3,441,143 £9,372,062 Not applicable Green<br />
C *Craigleith Road, Grangemouth Grangemouth Link 32 0 0 32 Complete £2,676,431 £1,436,937 £41,913 £46,127 £0 £54,666 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £2,718,344 £1,537,730 £4,256,074 Not applicable Green<br />
OS *Mayfield Drive, Longcroft Denny & Bonnybridge Link 16 0 0 16 On site £328,209 £0 £637,000 £682,914 £0 £50,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £965,209 £732,914 £1,698,123 Not applicable Green<br />
OS *McTaggart Avenue, Denny Denny & Bonnybridge Horizon 10 0 0 10 On site £300,000 £0 £485,155 £521,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £785,155 £521,000 £1,306,155 Not applicable Green<br />
BB *Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 1) Polmont & Rural South Kingdom 28 0 0 28 <br />
BB *Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 1)<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert &<br />
Rural North<br />
Link 22 0 0 22 <br />
In negotiations with<br />
private developer<br />
RSL partnership with<br />
private developer<br />
£0 £0 £1,775,100 £0 £390,000 £1,320,000 £0 £43,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £2,165,100 £1,363,000 £3,528,100 Acquisition & <strong>Plan</strong>ning Green<br />
£0 £0 £524,014 £0 £911,077 £900,583 £0 £400,292 £0 £50,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,435,091 £1,350,875 £2,785,966 None Green<br />
BB *Bridge Street, Bonnybridge Denny & Bonnybridge Link 6 0 0 6 Acquisition Sept <strong>2010</strong> £0 £0 £434,910 £298,146 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £434,910 £298,146 £733,056<br />
1st = Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 2)<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert &<br />
Rural North<br />
Link 0 27 0 27 <br />
RSL partnership with<br />
private developer<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £1,795,500 £1,184,625 £0 £334,875 £0 £60,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,795,500 £1,579,500 £3,375,000<br />
2nd = Park Terrace, Brightons Polmont & Rural South Link 16 0 0 16 Acquired £0 £6,524 £0 £0 £73,448 £83,388 £990,552 £726,088 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,064,000 £816,000 £1,880,000 Funding Green<br />
3rd Mary Street, Lauriston Polmont & Rural South Key 2 0 0 2 Owned by RSL £0 £0 £0 £0 £116,000 £116,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £116,000 £116,000 £232,000 Funding Green<br />
4th = Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 2) Polmont & Rural South Kingdom 21 0 0 21 <br />
1st = Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 3)<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert &<br />
Rural North<br />
Link 18 0 0 18 <br />
In negotiations with<br />
private developer<br />
RSL partnership with<br />
private developer<br />
Roads Construction<br />
Consent<br />
Building Warrant &<br />
Funding<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £1,654,000 £971,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,654,000 £971,000 £2,625,000 Acquisition & <strong>Plan</strong>ning Green<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,197,000 £702,000 £0 £301,000 £0 £50,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,197,000 £1,053,000 £2,250,000<br />
2nd = Burnside Terrace, Camelon <strong>Falkirk</strong> Key 4 0 0 4 Owned by RSL £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £220,000 £220,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £220,000 £220,000 £440,000 Funding Green<br />
4th = Overton Crescent, Redding (Phase 3) Polmont & Rural South Kingdom 13 0 10 23 <br />
In negotiations with<br />
private developer<br />
Building Warrant &<br />
Funding<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,524,000 £1,352,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,524,000 £1,352,000 £2,876,000 To be acquired Amber<br />
4th = Glenburn Road, Hallglen <strong>Falkirk</strong> Loretto 25 0 0 25 Acquired £0 £0 £0 £0 £429,689 £0 £1,080,181 £0 £570,130 £960,000 £0 £160,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £2,080,000 £1,120,000 £3,200,000<br />
Social Work to confirm<br />
supported accommodation<br />
requirements, <strong>Housing</strong> to<br />
confirm mix<br />
5th Auchincloch, Banknock Denny & Bonnybridge Link 30 0 0 30 To be acquired £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,168,798 £330,000 £826,202 £627,725 £0 £497,275 £0 £0 £1,995,000 £1,455,000 £3,450,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Amber<br />
6th = Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood Denny & Bonnybridge Link 27 0 0 27 <br />
6th = Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Falkirk</strong> Hanover 27 0 0 27 <br />
RSL partnership with<br />
private developer<br />
Negotations with site<br />
owner<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,768,500 £1,291,500 £0 £45,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,768,500 £1,336,500 £3,105,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Amber<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,146,324 £300,000 £953,676 £900,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £2,100,000 £1,200,000 £3,300,000 Acquisition Amber<br />
7th Canal Walk, Bonnybridge Denny & Bonnybridge Link 38 0 0 38 Acquired £0 £0 £0 £760,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,327,020 £0 £1,199,980 £1,463,000 £0 £0 £2,527,000 £2,223,000 £4,750,000 None Green<br />
8th Vellore Road, Maddiston Polmont & Rural South Link 18 0 0 18 Option with site owner £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,188,873 £833,000 £8,127 £0 £0 £40,000 £1,197,000 £873,000 £2,070,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Amber<br />
9th Westquarter Social Club, Westquarter Polmont & Rural South Hanover 14 0 0 14 To be acquired £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,156,414 £500,000 £0 £0 £1,300,000 £500,000 £1,800,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Amber<br />
10th =<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay,<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 1)<br />
10th = Edward Avenue, Larbert<br />
Project Ranking<br />
SHIP Total<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> Weslo 22 0 0 22 <br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert &<br />
Rural North<br />
To be acquired and<br />
landbanked by RSL in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £0 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £2,445,037 None Amber<br />
Link 25 15 0 40 Option with site owner £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £562,030 £0 £2,097,970 £1,940,000 £2,660,000 £1,940,000 £4,600,000<br />
300 42 10 352 £12,339,675 £6,165,712 £5,338,426 £3,813,157 £5,369,714 £4,876,396 £5,011,733 £3,778,255 £4,653,752 £3,292,500 £4,295,771 £2,615,725 £4,295,771 £3,536,092 £2,097,970 £1,980,000 £43,546,398 £30,057,837 £71,404,235<br />
Total 523 53 26 602<br />
£18,505,387 £9,151,583 £10,246,110 £8,789,988<br />
£7,946,252 £6,911,496<br />
£7,831,863<br />
£4,077,970<br />
* Projects currently on site/ complete / spend within <strong>2010</strong>/11 and not included in the Scottish Government Proforma Hag Target for Each Financial Year £5,007,454 £4,673,624 £4,339,793 £4,005,963 £4,005,963 = £22,032,797<br />
Less Stage 3 budget (Adaptations) £234,375 £218,750 £203,125 £187,500 £187,500 = £1,031,250<br />
C Complete Total HAG Target £4,773,079 £4,454,874 £4,136,668 £3,818,463 £3,818,463<br />
OS On Site<br />
BB Block B for <strong>2010</strong>/11 Add 12.5% slippage per year £596,634 £556,859 £517,084 £477,308 £477,308<br />
HAG Year Total for <strong>2010</strong> SHIP £5,369,714 £5,011,733 £4,653,752 £4,295,771 £4,295,771<br />
Total HAG Requirement for 2011/12 - 2015/16 =<br />
Total Slippage 2011/12 - 2015/16<br />
Variance 12%<br />
Previous Years<br />
£2,625,193<br />
Current Year<br />
£23,626,741<br />
Funding Requirements Main SHIP Programme 2011 - 2016<br />
Year 1 of <strong>Plan</strong> Year 2 of <strong>Plan</strong> Year 3 of <strong>Plan</strong> Year 4 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
No Of Units Ownership of Land (Tick app. Box) Status of land (Acquired,<br />
Option, Declared Surplus by<br />
LA, To be Declared Surplus by<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15<br />
2015/16<br />
2016 onwards<br />
Other LA etc)<br />
AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other Total<br />
Year 5 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Future Years<br />
SUMMARY Known Site Constraints<br />
Amendment to <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
and Funding<br />
Development<br />
Status (Green,<br />
Amber or Red)<br />
Green<br />
Amber<br />
Amber<br />
Green<br />
Amber
Appendix 1d<br />
SHIP Shadow Programme<br />
(5 Year Programme and Financial Profile)
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 - Shadow Programme Financial Profile Appendix 1d<br />
No Of Units Ownership of Land (Tick app. Box) Status of land (Acquired,<br />
Previous Years<br />
Current Year<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
Year 1 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2011/12<br />
Year 2 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2012/13<br />
Year 3 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2013/14<br />
Year 4 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2014/15<br />
Year 5 of <strong>Plan</strong><br />
2015/16<br />
Future Years<br />
2016 onwards<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Option, Declared Surplus by LA,<br />
Priority<br />
Project<br />
Ranking<br />
Sub-Area RSL Partner Rent SE SO Total * RSL LA<br />
Private<br />
Dev.<br />
Private<br />
Owner<br />
Public<br />
Body<br />
Other<br />
To be Declared Surplus by LA<br />
etc)<br />
AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other AHIP Other Total<br />
10th = Dennyloanhead (Phase 1)<br />
10th = Dennyloanhead (Phase 2)<br />
10th = Dennyloanhead (Phase 3)<br />
10th =<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay,<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 2)<br />
12th = Banknock SIRR (Phase 1)<br />
12th = Banknock SIRR (Phase 2)<br />
12th = Banknock SIRR (Phase 3)<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Link 25 0 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £402,000 £606,250 £1,260,500 £606,250 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Amber<br />
Link 0 25 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,150,000 £1,660,000 £0 £65,000 £0 £0 £1,150,000 £1,725,000 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Amber<br />
Link 25 0 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,662,500 £1,162,500 £0 £50,000 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Amber<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> Weslo 22 0 0 22 <br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
To be acquired and<br />
landbanked by RSL in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £654,252 £0 £0 £0 £714,968 £951,120 £0 £124,697 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £2,445,037 None Red<br />
Link 25 0 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,662,500 £1,162,500 £0 £50,000 £0 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Red<br />
Link 0 25 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,150,000 £1,660,000 £0 £65,000 £1,150,000 £1,725,000 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Red<br />
Link 25 0 0 25 Section 75 Agreement £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £2,875,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Red<br />
13th Glenfair Nursery, Camelon <strong>Falkirk</strong> Link 8 0 0 8 <br />
14th = Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 1)<br />
14th = Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 2)<br />
14th = Whitecross SIRR (Phase 1)<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural<br />
North<br />
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural<br />
North<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
Weslo 15 0 0 15 <br />
Weslo 15 0 0 15 <br />
Link 40 0 0 40 <br />
To be declared surplus by<br />
LA<br />
To be acquired and<br />
landbanked by RSL in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
To be acquired and<br />
landbanked by RSL in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
Discussions with land<br />
owner<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £36,367 £0 £109,913 £388,000 £385,720 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £532,000 £388,000 £920,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Amber<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £283,379 £0 £650,105 £633,435 £0 £100,016 £0 £0 £0 £0 £933,484 £733,451 £1,666,935 None Red<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £568,610 £0 £364,874 £633,435 £0 £100,016 £0 £0 £933,484 £733,451 £1,666,935 None Red<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,480,000 £1,060,000 £1,180,000 £880,000 £2,660,000 £1,940,000 £4,600,000 <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Funding Red<br />
15th The Hurlet, Tamfourhill <strong>Falkirk</strong> Hanover 14 0 0 14 To be acquired £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £500,000 £200,000 £500,000 £200,000 £0 £0 £1,000,000 £400,000 £1,400,000<br />
16th Main Street, Polmont<br />
17th John Davidson Drive, Dunipace<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
Denny &<br />
Bonnybridge<br />
Hanover 24 0 0 24 <br />
To be declared surplus by<br />
LA<br />
Funding Requirements Shadow SHIP 2011 - 2016<br />
£0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,700,000 £800,000 £0 £0 £1,700,000 £800,000 £2,500,000<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning, acquisition, site to<br />
be declared surplus, ground<br />
lease to owner of bar<br />
Site to be declared surplus<br />
by LA, Social Work to<br />
Horizon 30 10 0 40 To be acquired £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £2,835,000 £1,500,000 £945,000 £500,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £3,780,000 £2,000,000 £5,780,000 Local <strong>Plan</strong> Issues, <strong>Plan</strong>ning Red<br />
18th = Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 1) Bo'ness Weslo 20 0 0 20 Owned by RSL and LA £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £209,606 £0 £951,636 £498,049 £0 £414,355 £0 £0 £1,161,242 £912,404 £2,073,646<br />
18th = Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 2) Bo'ness Weslo 20 0 0 20 Owned by RSL and LA £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £209,606 £0 £951,636 £643,017 £0 £269,387 £1,161,242 £912,404 £2,073,646<br />
Total 308 60 0 368 £0 £0 £0 £0 £690,619 £0 £393,292 £388,000 £5,364,009 £3,084,555 £5,783,616 £4,878,697 £7,846,136 £6,761,138 £4,103,000 £3,083,137 £24,180,672 £18,195,527 £42,376,199<br />
£0 £0 £690,619 £781,292 £8,448,564 £10,662,313 £14,607,274 £7,186,137<br />
Known Site Constraints<br />
Awaiting outcome of The<br />
Open Space Strategy<br />
Awaiting outcome of The<br />
Open Space Strategy<br />
Development<br />
Status (Green,<br />
Amber or Red)<br />
Amber<br />
Amber<br />
Red<br />
Red
Priority<br />
Ranking<br />
* To Be Determined<br />
PROJECT<br />
RSL/Partner Sub Area<br />
Area<br />
Surplus/<br />
Shortfall<br />
Earliest<br />
Date<br />
Project<br />
could be on<br />
site<br />
Rent<br />
Shared<br />
Equity<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 20011 - 2016 - Shadow Programme<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 20011- 2016 - Shadow Programme<br />
No. of Units Funding <strong>Strategic</strong> Links<br />
SO Total FC HAG PF Other Total SOA L.H.S SCP LP SP<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 2)<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Weslo <strong>Falkirk</strong> +19 Apr-16 22 0<br />
0 22 £0 £1,369,220 £1,075,817 £0 £2,445,037<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 &<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 3,4, 6<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Dennyloandhead (Phase 1)<br />
11<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Apr-12 25 0 0 25 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Dennyloandhead (Phase 2)<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Apr-13 0 25 0 25 £0 £1,150,000 £1,725,000 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Dennyloandhead (Phase 3)<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
10th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Apr-14 25 0 0 25 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Banknock SIRR (Phase 1)<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
12th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Oct-14 25 0 0 25 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Banknock SIRR (Phase 2)<br />
10<br />
12th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Oct-15 0 25 0 25 £0 £1,150,000 £1,725,000 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Banknock SIRR (Phase 3)<br />
10<br />
12th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Oct-16 25 0 0 25 £0 £1,662,500 £1,212,500 £0 £2,875,000<br />
National Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Glenfair Nursery, Camelon<br />
10<br />
13th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link <strong>Falkirk</strong> 19 Apr-12 8 0<br />
0 8 *TBD £532,000 £388,000 £0 £920,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objectives 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 1)<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
14th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 2)<br />
Weslo<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
93 Jun-13 15 0 0 15 £0 £933,484 £733,451 £0 £1,666,935<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
14th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Whitecross SIRR (Phase 1)<br />
Weslo<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
93 Jan-14 15 0 0 15 £0 £933,484 £733,451 £0 £1,666,935<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
14th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Link Polmont & Rural South 67 Apr-12 40 0 0 40 £0 £2,960,000 £2,120,000 £0 £5,080,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
The Hurlet, Tamfourhill<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
15th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Hanover <strong>Falkirk</strong> +19 Apr-15 14 0 0 14 *TBD £1,000,000 £400,000 £0 £1,400,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Main Street, Polmont<br />
10<br />
16th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Hanover Polmont & Rural South 67 Jun-15 24 0 0 24 *TBD £1,700,000 £800,000 £0 £2,500,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 5 Objective 15<br />
New Build<br />
John Davidson Drive, Dunipace<br />
10 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
17th<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Horizon Denny & Bonnybridge 42 Feb-14 30 10 0 40 £0 £3,780,000 £2,000,000 £0 £5,780,000<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 1)<br />
10<br />
18th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Weslo Bo'ness 19 May-14 20 0 0 20 £0 £1,161,242 £912,404 £0 £2,073,646<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4, 6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 2)<br />
10<br />
18th =<br />
Site Acquisition<br />
CS Tender Approval Date Weslo Bo'ness 19 Apr-15 20 0 0 20 £0 £1,161,242 £912,404 £0 £2,073,646<br />
National <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 4,6<br />
outcome 7 & <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 3 Objective 8<br />
New Build<br />
10<br />
Totals 286 60 0 368 £0 £24,480,672 £18,375,527 £0 £42,856,199<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 7<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO design quality and<br />
standards, environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
environment and image<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image PO Sustainable communities SO housing<br />
growth residential amenity<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
environment and image<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.1<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.1<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3<br />
Sustaining Communities Policy<br />
Com 3, 4.2<br />
Appendix 1d
Appendix 1e<br />
5 Year <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme
PROJECT<br />
Chisholm Place, Grangemouth<br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
Revised CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Chequers, Hallglen<br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Sheil Gardens, Langlees<br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Carron Road/ Millflat Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
Cadow Avenue West, Bo'ness<br />
Site Acquisition Not applicable<br />
CS Tender Approval Date<br />
New Build<br />
RSL/Partner Sub Area<br />
On site<br />
Area<br />
Surplus/<br />
Shortfall<br />
Rent<br />
Shared<br />
Equity<br />
SO Total<br />
Totals 120 0 0 120<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme <strong>2010</strong> - 2012 Appendix 1e<br />
FALKIRK COUNCIL NEW BUILD PROGRAMME <strong>2010</strong> - 2012<br />
No. of Units <strong>2010</strong> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Grangemouth +56 12 0 0 12 12 796,000 £150,000 £300,000 £1,246,000<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Falkirk</strong> 19 18 0 0 18 18 1,131,000 £100,000 £450,000 £1,681,000<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Falkirk</strong> 19 20 0 0 20 20 1,200,000 £150,000 £500,000 £1,850,000<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Falkirk</strong> 19 36 0 0 36 36 1,937,000 £150,000 £1,080,000 £3,167,000<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Falkirk</strong> 19 10 0 0 10 10 1,175,000 £100,000 £250,000 £1,525,000<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Bo'ness 19 24 0 0 24 24 1,850,000 £150,000 £600,000 £2,600,000<br />
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16<br />
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M<br />
Estimated Unit Completion in Year 84 36 0 0 0<br />
Number<br />
of Units<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Direct Cost<br />
Notional<br />
land Value<br />
Scottish<br />
Government<br />
<strong>Council</strong> New<br />
Build Grant<br />
120<br />
120<br />
£8,089,000 £800,000 £3,180,000 £12,069,000<br />
STRATEGIC LINKS<br />
Total SOA L.H.S SCP LP SP<br />
National<br />
outcome 7<br />
& 10<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3,4<br />
and 6<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4<br />
& 10<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4<br />
& 10<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4<br />
& 10<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4<br />
& 10<br />
National<br />
outcome 7 <strong>Strategic</strong> Priority 2 Objective 3, 4<br />
& 10<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
Key Themes<br />
5 & 6<br />
PO Environmental quality SO environment and<br />
image<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
environment and image<br />
PO Sustaining communities SOs <strong>Housing</strong> growth,<br />
Sustaining Communities<br />
Residential amenity PO Environmental quality SO<br />
Policy Com 3<br />
environment and image
Appendix 2<br />
Moving Forward - The LHS Framework
Appendix 2a<br />
Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy Task Group Structures
HOUSING NEED<br />
DEMAND & SUPPLY<br />
EXECUTIVE GROUP<br />
HOUSING NEED &<br />
DEMAND<br />
ASSESSMENT<br />
WORKING GROUP<br />
COMMUNITY CARE/<br />
HOUSING SUPPORT<br />
NEEDS ASSESSMENT<br />
SUB GROUP<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 - Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy Task Group Structure Appendix 2a<br />
STOCK CONDITION<br />
EXECUTIVE GROUP<br />
SHQS<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP<br />
PRIVATE SECTOR<br />
STOCK<br />
CONDITION<br />
PRIVATE<br />
SECTOR<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP<br />
IMPROVING OUR<br />
NEIGHBOURHOODS<br />
LHS STEERING<br />
GROUP<br />
FALKIRK HOMELESSNESS<br />
FORUM EXECUTIVE<br />
GROUP<br />
HOMELESSNESS<br />
PREVENTION<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP<br />
PRIVATE RENTED<br />
SECTOR<br />
ISSUES<br />
HOMELESSNESS<br />
ACCOMMODATION<br />
WORKING GROUP<br />
FALKIRK RSL<br />
FORUM<br />
HOMELESSNESS<br />
SUPPORT<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP<br />
LHS<br />
CONSULTATION<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP<br />
ENERGY<br />
EFFICIENCY<br />
FUEL POVERTY<br />
WORKING<br />
GROUP
Appendix 2b<br />
Group Structures
Internal<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Colin Hemfrey<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Andrew Wilson<br />
Paul McLay<br />
Joan MacLellan<br />
External<br />
Gordon Paterson (HARD)<br />
Maureen Esplin (HARD)<br />
Consultation/ Ad hoc Attendance<br />
Internal<br />
David Moffat (Economic<br />
Development)<br />
Brian Heron (Finance)<br />
Amanda Campbell(Finance)<br />
External<br />
RSLs x 3<br />
Builders<br />
Developers<br />
Private Landlords<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 - Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy Task Groups<br />
Internal<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Paul McLay<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Wraight Shepherd<br />
External<br />
Gordon Paterson (HARD)<br />
Maureen Esplin (HARD)<br />
Link ,Paragon Loretto, Weslo,<br />
Horizon, Ark, ,Margaret<br />
Blackwood, Bield, Hanover, Key,<br />
Cairn, Sanctuary, Kingdom,<br />
Castle Rock Edinvar <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Associations<br />
LOCAL HOUSING STRATEGY 2009-2014<br />
TASK GROUP STRUCTURE<br />
LHS Steering Group RSL Forum <strong>Housing</strong> Need, Demand & Supply<br />
Executive Group<br />
Chair<br />
Chair<br />
Chair<br />
Jennifer Litts<br />
RSLs to nominate<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Internal<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Joan MacLellan<br />
Jenny Boag<br />
Colin Hemfrey<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
Des McCart<br />
Philip Morgan-Klein<br />
Andrew Wilson<br />
Joan MacLellan<br />
External<br />
Gordon Paterson (or nominee)<br />
RSL Representatives (1x<br />
mainstream; 1x specialist)<br />
Homes For Scotland (as required)<br />
1<br />
Internal<br />
Kenny Gillespie<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Alex Barr<br />
Stephen Murphy<br />
Paul McLay<br />
Duncan Smith<br />
External<br />
RSL representative (x2) to be<br />
identified<br />
Appendix 2b<br />
Stock Condition Executive Group <strong>Falkirk</strong> Homelessness Forum<br />
Executive Group<br />
Chair<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Jennifer Litts (Chair)<br />
Internal<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Joanna Stewart<br />
Linda Gilliland<br />
Jim Littlejohn<br />
Nigel Fletcher<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
Vivien Thomson<br />
Mark Meechan<br />
External<br />
HARD (TBI)<br />
Link HA<br />
Paragon HA<br />
Loretto HA<br />
Link Living<br />
Cyrenians<br />
Quickstart<br />
Health<br />
Employment/Training<br />
YMCA
<strong>Housing</strong> Need and<br />
Demand<br />
Assessment<br />
Working Group<br />
Chair<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Internal<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Joan MacLellan<br />
Jenny Boag<br />
Colin Hemfrey<br />
Catherine Devlin<br />
External<br />
Gordon Paterson<br />
(or nominee)<br />
SHQS Working<br />
Group<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Internal<br />
Kenny Gillespie<br />
Robert McMaster<br />
Robin Millard<br />
Alex Barr<br />
Duncan Smith<br />
Tony Wooton<br />
External<br />
To be agreed<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 - Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy Task Groups<br />
Private Sector<br />
Working Group<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Internal<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Mary Armitage<br />
Stephen Murphy<br />
Gaynor Wilson or<br />
Lorna Fleming<br />
Graham Webster<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
External<br />
To be agreed<br />
Homelessness<br />
Prevention Working<br />
Group<br />
Chair<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Internal<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Joanna Stewart<br />
Claire Edwards<br />
Senior Officer<br />
(Homelessness<br />
Support)<br />
Nan Smith<br />
Jenny Kane<br />
Revenues (TBI )<br />
External<br />
Lorraine Gillies<br />
(Cyrenians)<br />
Health –TBI<br />
Loretto Care (TBI)<br />
Irene Blackburn<br />
(LinkLiving<br />
2<br />
Homelessness<br />
Accommodation<br />
Working Group<br />
Chair<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Internal<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Paul Donnachie<br />
Joanna Stewart<br />
Jenny Kane (SW)<br />
External<br />
To be identified<br />
Homelessness<br />
Support Working<br />
Group<br />
Chair<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Internal<br />
Senior Worker<br />
(Homelessness<br />
Support)<br />
Peter Anderson<br />
(SW)<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
(SW)<br />
Review Officers<br />
Joanna Stewart<br />
(Communities<br />
Services rep to be<br />
identified)<br />
External<br />
LinkLiving (TBI)<br />
Health (TBI)<br />
Salvation Army (TBI)<br />
LHS Consultation<br />
Working Group<br />
Chair<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Internal<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Marie Dunbar<br />
Paul McLay<br />
Wraight Shepherd<br />
Andrew Wilson or<br />
Steve Rolfe<br />
Caroline Binnie<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
or Philip Morgan-<br />
Klein<br />
Community<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning TBI<br />
Colin Hemfrey (or<br />
rep) (Development<br />
Services)<br />
External<br />
RSLs x1<br />
Appendix 2b<br />
Home Energy/Fuel<br />
Poverty Working<br />
Group<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Internal<br />
Alex Barr<br />
Carole Glass<br />
Allyson Allison<br />
Linda Gilliland<br />
Brenda Roddy<br />
Repr. from<br />
Architects (tbi)<br />
External<br />
TBI
Community Care/<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Support<br />
Needs Assessment<br />
Sub Group<br />
Chair<br />
Susan Loudon<br />
Internal<br />
Liz MacEwen<br />
Karen Strang<br />
Kate Strachan<br />
Joan MacLellan<br />
Ann McGregor<br />
Philip Morgan-Klein<br />
Des McCart<br />
Suzanne Thomson<br />
Sarah McKinlay<br />
Private Sector team<br />
nominee<br />
External<br />
Gordon Paterson<br />
RSL x 1 (specialist<br />
providers)<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 - Local <strong>Housing</strong> Strategy Task Groups<br />
Private Rented<br />
Sector Sub Group<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Internal<br />
Steve Bentley<br />
Stephen Murphy<br />
Mary Armitage<br />
Lorna Fleming or<br />
Gaynor Wilson<br />
External<br />
John Blackwood<br />
Private Sector Stock<br />
Condition Sub<br />
Group<br />
Chair<br />
David Dunbar<br />
Internal<br />
Stephen Murphy<br />
Mary Armitage<br />
Lorna<br />
Fleming/Gaynor<br />
Wilson<br />
Graham Webster<br />
3<br />
Appendix 2b
Appendix 3<br />
Equalities
Appendix 3a<br />
Equalities Information from Registered Social Landlord<br />
Waiting Lists for <strong>2010</strong> SHIP
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3a<br />
Equalities Information<br />
Equalities Information from RSL waiting lists SHIP <strong>2010</strong><br />
The following table indicates the information received from the 9 RSL partners who<br />
have supplied their waiting list applicant information.<br />
Age Bands of RSL waiting list applicants<br />
RSL 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-59 60+ Unknown Total<br />
Barony 19 19<br />
Cairn 80 80<br />
Hanover 49 49<br />
Horizon 6 12 15 30 16 79<br />
Kingdom 1 2 4 5 3 15<br />
Link 1 3290 3291<br />
Loretto 183 183<br />
Mgt Blackwood 8 7 16 22 21 74<br />
Paragon 427 427<br />
Total 16 21 35 57 40 4048 4217<br />
Source: RSL proforma return <strong>2010</strong> to <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Gender information on RSL waiting list applicants<br />
Gender<br />
RSL Female Male Couples Total<br />
Barony 9 8 2 19<br />
Cairn 40 40 80<br />
Hanover 22 12 15 49<br />
Horizon 45 34 79<br />
Kingdom 7 8 15<br />
Link 1950 1341 3291<br />
Loretto 82 101 183<br />
Mgt Blackwood 36 38 74<br />
Paragon 251 176 427<br />
Total 2442 1758 17 4217<br />
Source: RSL proforma return <strong>2010</strong> to <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3a<br />
Equalities Information<br />
Disability information re RSL waiting list applicants<br />
Disability<br />
Not<br />
Recorded<br />
with<br />
RSL No Yes recorded SCORE Unknown Total<br />
Barony 15 4 19<br />
Cairn 80 80<br />
Hanover 49 49<br />
Horizon 42 37 79<br />
Kingdom 15 15<br />
Link 3291 3291<br />
Loretto<br />
Mgt<br />
183 183<br />
Blackwood 37 21 16 74<br />
Paragon 427 427<br />
Total 15 83 3627 427 65 4217<br />
Source: RSL proforma return <strong>2010</strong> to <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Religious information on RSL applicants<br />
Religion<br />
Not<br />
Recorded<br />
with<br />
RSL<br />
recorded SCORE Unknown Total<br />
Barony 19 19<br />
Cairn 80 80<br />
Hanover 49 49<br />
Horizon 79 79<br />
Kingdom 15 15<br />
Link 3291 3291<br />
Loretto<br />
Mgt<br />
183 183<br />
Blackwood 74 74<br />
Paragon 427 427<br />
Total 3741 427<br />
Source: RSL proforma return <strong>2010</strong> to <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
49 4217
Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information for New Build Lets by <strong>Housing</strong><br />
By Registered Social Landlord 2009 - 10
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
Equalities information for new build lets by housing association 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
The Equalities Impact Assessment of the SHIP 2008 identified a gap in relation to<br />
data collection with regards to who RSLs allocate their new build properties to in line<br />
with the equalities strands race, disability and age.<br />
The 2 tables below include information collated by Paragon and Weslo for 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
on new build lets.<br />
Table 1. New build lets by age group for Paragon <strong>Housing</strong> Association and<br />
Weslo <strong>Housing</strong> Management 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Age group Paragon Weslo Total<br />
16-20 1 1 2<br />
21-34 7 1 8<br />
35-50 7 2 9<br />
51-60 0 1 1<br />
60+ 0 0<br />
Total 15 5 20<br />
Table 2. New build lets by ethnicity for Paragon <strong>Housing</strong> Association and Weslo<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Management 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Ethnicity Paragon Weslo Total<br />
White English 1 1<br />
White Scottish 14 5 19<br />
Total 15 5 20
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
The tables below include information collated from Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association on new<br />
build lets for 2009 - <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Table 3. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by economic status 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Economic Activity No. %<br />
Work full-time 22 42%<br />
Work part-time 4 8%<br />
Unemployed 13 25%<br />
Retired 3 6%<br />
At home 1 2%<br />
Disabled/L-T sick 4 8%<br />
Not Known 5 10%<br />
Total 52 100%<br />
Table 4. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by ethnicity 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
No. %<br />
White Scottish 46 88%<br />
White English 1 2%<br />
Not Known 5 10%<br />
Total 52 100%<br />
Table 5. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by age group 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Age group No. %<br />
16-19 years old 3 6%<br />
20-25 years old 7 13%<br />
26-34 years old 12 23%<br />
35-49 years old 13 25%<br />
50-59 years old 7 13%<br />
60-75 years old 5 10%<br />
Not Known 5 10%<br />
Total 52 100%<br />
Table 6. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by gender 2009-<strong>2010</strong><br />
Gender No. %<br />
Male 13 25%<br />
Female 34 65%<br />
Not Known 5 10%<br />
Total 52 100%
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
The tables below include equalities information from Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association for<br />
new build lets from January-March <strong>2010</strong>. This is information that Link <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Association has recently started collating and the monitoring form is included at the<br />
end of this document.<br />
Table 7. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by sexual orientation January-<br />
March <strong>2010</strong><br />
Sexual Orientation No. %<br />
No response 6 55%<br />
Heterosexual/Straight 4 36%<br />
Prefer not to say 1 9%<br />
Total 11 100%<br />
Table 8. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by religion January-March<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Religion No. %<br />
No response 5 45%<br />
None 3 27%<br />
Church of Scotland 2 18%<br />
Pagan 1 9%<br />
Total 11 100%<br />
Table 9. Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association new build lets by disability January-March<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Disability No. %<br />
No response 6 55%<br />
A physical disability 1 9%<br />
None 4 36%<br />
Total 11 100%
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
DIVERSITY MONITORING FORM 2009<br />
1. Name _______________________________<br />
2. Gender<br />
(a) Are you: Female Male<br />
3. Age<br />
I am ____ years old and my date of birth is: __/___/____<br />
4. Relationship Status<br />
What is your relationship status?<br />
1 Never married and never registered a same sex civil partnership<br />
2 Married 7 In a registered same-sex civil partnership<br />
3 Separated, but still 8 Separated, but still legally in a same-sex<br />
legally married civil partnership<br />
4 Divorced 9 Formerly in a same-sex civil partnership<br />
which is now legally dissolved<br />
5 Widowed 10 Surviving partner from a same-sex civil<br />
partnership<br />
6 Living with Partner 11 Prefer not to say<br />
5. Religion<br />
What religion, religious denomination or body do you belong to?<br />
1 None 7 Church of Scotland<br />
2 Roman Catholic 8 Other Christian<br />
3 Muslim 9 Buddhist<br />
4 Sikh 10 Jewish<br />
5 Hindu 11 Pagan<br />
6 Another religion, please write in _________________________<br />
12 Prefer not to say<br />
6. National Identity<br />
How would you describe your national identity?<br />
* Tick all that apply<br />
1 Scottish 5 English<br />
2 British 6 Polish<br />
3 Indian 7 Other, please write in ________________<br />
4 Prefer not to say<br />
7. Ethnic Group<br />
What is your ethnic group? *<br />
* Choose ONE section from A to E, then tick ONE box which best describes<br />
your ethnic group or background.<br />
A White<br />
1 Scottish 6 English
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
2 Welsh 7 Northern Irish<br />
3 British 8 Irish<br />
4 Gypsy/Traveller 9 Polish<br />
5 Other white ethnic group, please write in _____________________<br />
B Mixed or multiple ethnic groups<br />
10 Any mixed or multiple ethnic groups, please write in<br />
________________________________________<br />
C Asian, Asian Scottish or Asian British<br />
11 Pakistani, Pakistani Scottish or Pakistani British<br />
12 Indian, Indian Scottish or Indian British<br />
13 Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi Scottish or Bangladeshi British<br />
14 Chinese, Chinese Scottish or Chinese British<br />
15 Other, please write in<br />
___________________________________<br />
D African, Caribbean or Black<br />
16 African, African Scottish or African British<br />
17 Caribbean, Caribbean Scottish or Caribbean British<br />
18 Black, Black Scottish or Black British<br />
19 Other, please write in<br />
____________________________________<br />
E Other ethnic group<br />
20 Arab<br />
21 Other, please write in<br />
______________________________________<br />
F 22 Prefer not to say<br />
8. Sexual Orientation<br />
Which of the following best describes your sexual orientation?<br />
1 Bisexual 4 Other<br />
2 Gay / Lesbian / 5 Prefer not answer<br />
Homosexual<br />
3 Heterosexual/Straight<br />
9. Disability<br />
A disabled person as defined by the Disability Discrimination Act is someone<br />
with a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long term<br />
impact on their ability to carry out day to day activities. This excludes<br />
situations where sight can be corrected by glasses. Having read this<br />
definition, please indicate if you consider yourself to have a disability under<br />
any of the following categories, or tick ‘None’ if you do not consider yourself<br />
disabled.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3b<br />
Equalities Information<br />
* Tick all that apply<br />
1 Deafness or severe hearing impairment<br />
2 Blindness or severe vision impairment<br />
3 A physical disability (a condition that substantially limits one or more<br />
basic physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, lifting or carrying)<br />
4 A learning disability (such as Down’s Syndrome)<br />
5 A learning difficulty (such as dyslexia or dyspraxia)<br />
6 A mental health condition (such as depression or schizophrenia)<br />
7 A chronic illness (such as cancer, HIV, diabetes, heart disease or<br />
epilepsy)<br />
8 Other condition<br />
9 None
Appendix 3c<br />
Equalities Impact Assessment <strong>2010</strong>
SCREENING<br />
Questions:<br />
1. Policy Name<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3c<br />
Equalities Impact Assessment <strong>2010</strong><br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
Equalities Impact Assessment SHIP <strong>2010</strong><br />
2. What is the aim, objective or purpose of the policy?<br />
The Scottish Government allocates the resources within the affordable housing<br />
investment programme to the <strong>Council</strong>. This must be allocated by the <strong>Council</strong> to<br />
Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) to build new affordable housing units.<br />
In addition the <strong>Council</strong> also allocates its own funds to build new housing.<br />
The SHIP pulls all this together.<br />
Therefore the main purpose of the <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is to illustrate how<br />
identified needs and priorities in relation to affordable housing will be tackled, with an<br />
emphasis on how projects will be delivered in practice, having regard to available<br />
resources, partnership working and development constraints.<br />
3. Who implements the policy?<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> - Corporate and Neighbourhood services (Strategy and Development<br />
Team) and <strong>Plan</strong>ning, Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) with a development<br />
programme. SHIP overseen by the RSL Forum.<br />
4. Who are the stakeholders or who is intended to benefit from the Policy and in what way<br />
(for example, staff, service users, visitors)?<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> - Corporate and Neighbourhood services Strategy and Development<br />
Team and <strong>Plan</strong>ning, RSLs with a development programme. Applicants on <strong>Council</strong>/RSL<br />
waiting lists.<br />
5. What data is available to facilitate the screening of the policy?<br />
ODS (2006) Assessing the <strong>Housing</strong> Needs of Minority Ethnic Communities in <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Newhaven Research (2007) <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Needs<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (2009) Summary Local <strong>Housing</strong> Needs Assessments<br />
RSL proformas (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (2009) Identifying the <strong>Housing</strong> Market<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (<strong>2010</strong>) The Current <strong>Housing</strong> Market<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (<strong>2010</strong>) <strong>Housing</strong> Need<br />
6. Is there any evidence of higher or lower uptake or exclusion by any of the equality<br />
strands?<br />
7./<br />
There is no evidence.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016 Appendix 3c<br />
Equalities Impact Assessment <strong>2010</strong><br />
7. Does evidence indicate there is access to services and benefits reduced or denied for<br />
some groups?<br />
There is no evidence.<br />
8. Do particular groups face increased difficulty or indignity as a result of the Policy?<br />
There is no evidence.<br />
9. Are there any higher complaints or lower satisfaction rates from particular groups in<br />
connection with the policy?<br />
There is no evidence.<br />
10. Is there any evidence that the policy fails to respond to the needs of a particular group?<br />
There is no evidence.<br />
11. Where are there gaps in data or non-availability of data which would need to be gathered<br />
in the future to ensure effective monitoring?<br />
The Equalities Impact Assessment for the SHIP 2008 indicated there was a gap in relation<br />
to who RSLs allocate their new build properties to in line with the equalities strands.<br />
Appendix 4b includes information from Paragon <strong>Housing</strong> Association and Weslo<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Management on Race and age for new build lets for 2009-<strong>2010</strong>. Link <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Association provided information for new build lets on gender, race, age and economic<br />
activity for 2009-<strong>2010</strong> and information on religion, sexual orientation and disability for<br />
January-March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
12. Considering all the information above, please indicate areas where a differential impact<br />
occurs or has the potential to occur.<br />
13. Recommend for full impact assessment (Yes or No) (*)<br />
No.<br />
14. If no, please outline reason for decision.<br />
The SHIP 2008 Equalities Impact Assessment identified data gaps, work to fill them has<br />
been outlined (question 11 and appendix 4b).<br />
(*) If yes to Q13, should automatically go to Full Impact Assessment process.
Appendix 4<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning and Land Supply - <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit
Appendix 4a<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit - Sites with an Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Requirement
Stenhousemuir/<br />
Larbert & Rural<br />
North<br />
Airth Castle 6 1.1 -93<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Land with Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Requirement<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> Area Site Name<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Market<br />
Sub Area Priority<br />
Annual Shortfall/<br />
Over Supply of<br />
Affordable<br />
<strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning Status<br />
*FCLP site<br />
Consent for 14<br />
units<br />
Yes/ No Percentage Units<br />
115 Yes 25% 29<br />
Subtotal 115 29<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Tamfourhill Road 1.2 +19<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> Royal<br />
Infirmary<br />
Gas Works Etna<br />
Road<br />
*FCLP site<br />
Outline application<br />
in<br />
Appendix 4a<br />
14 units to be built separately.<br />
No's should therefore reduce on<br />
rest of site<br />
500 Yes 15% 75 Application Ref:-P/10/0512/PPP<br />
1.2 +19 *FCLP site 150 Yes 15% 23<br />
1.2 +19 *FCLP site 100 Yes 15% 15 Hazard Consent needs revoked<br />
Merchiston Road 1.2 +19 *FCLP site 100 Yes 15% 15<br />
Subtotal 850 128<br />
Polmont & Rural<br />
South<br />
Blinkbonnie<br />
Terrace,<br />
Slamannan<br />
Manuel Works,<br />
Whitecross<br />
Toravon Manor 2,<br />
Maddiston<br />
Hillend Farm,<br />
Slamannan<br />
2 -67 *FCLP site 100 Yes 15% 15<br />
2 -67<br />
*FCLP site<br />
application in<br />
Outline planning consent has<br />
lapsed so query effective label -<br />
1500 Yes 15% 225 Application Ref:-P/10/0188/PPP<br />
2 -67 *FCLP site 120 Yes 25% 30<br />
2 -67 *FCLP site 550 Yes 15% 83<br />
Subtotal 2270 353<br />
Denny,<br />
Bonnybridge &<br />
Banknock<br />
Cannerton<br />
Brickworks<br />
Dennyloanhead,<br />
Broomridge 2<br />
3 -42<br />
3 -42<br />
SIRR site<br />
application in<br />
*FCLP site<br />
application in<br />
New site introduced as<br />
modification to FCLP by council<br />
decision 15/6/10<br />
New site introduced as<br />
modification to FCLP by council<br />
decision 15/6/10<br />
500 Yes 15% 75 Application Ref:-P/10/0360/PPP<br />
500 Yes 15% 75 Application Ref:-P/09/0508/OUT<br />
Denny High School 3 -42 *FCLP site 200 Yes 15% 30<br />
Mydub C 3 -42 *FCLP site 300 Yes 15% 45<br />
Carrongrove Mill 3 -42<br />
Broad Street,<br />
Denny<br />
*FCLP site<br />
minded to grant<br />
3 -42 *FCLP site<br />
173 Yes 15% 26<br />
possibly up to 100<br />
or over<br />
possibly if<br />
capacity<br />
reaches 100<br />
15% 15<br />
Subtotal 1673 266<br />
Bo'ness<br />
Bo'ness Foreshore 4 -19<br />
SIRR site<br />
minded to grant<br />
750 No 15% 112<br />
Subtotal 750 112<br />
Total 5658 888<br />
* <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Other Land with Agreed Development Potential<br />
Overall Unit<br />
Build Capacity<br />
(units)<br />
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Policy<br />
Notes (<strong>Plan</strong>ning)<br />
Outline planning consent has<br />
lapsed so query effective label<br />
New site introduced as<br />
modification to FCLP by council<br />
decision 15/6/10; site and capacity<br />
to be defined by masterplan<br />
Could be revisited if new<br />
applications come in which vary<br />
from outline consent<br />
05/0571/OUT
Appendix 4b<br />
Maps by Sub Area - <strong>Housing</strong> Land Audit Sites with an<br />
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Requirement
Appendix 5<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning and Land Supply - Current & Future Land Supply<br />
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Appendix 6<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning and Land Supply - Constraints
Appendix 6a<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning & Land Supply - Cross Service<br />
Pre-Development Consultation Proforma
Project Name:<br />
1 PROPERTY SERVICES: (FALKIRK COUNCIL OWNED SITES ONLY)<br />
YES NO<br />
Has a site boundary plan been prepared?<br />
Has a joint site visit been carried out?<br />
Has a title check been carried out?<br />
Have any known constraints been identified?<br />
Do any wayleaves exist on the site?<br />
Are there any existing leases affecting the site?<br />
Has the DV valued the site?<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Cross Service Pre-Development Consultation Proforma<br />
Local Map Attached:<br />
YES NO Date: Attendees:<br />
YES NO<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO<br />
If YES:<br />
Market Value AH Value<br />
£<br />
£<br />
2 LAW & ADMIN SERVICES: (FALKIRK COUNCIL OWNED SITES ONLY)<br />
YES<br />
Does the <strong>Council</strong> have a marketable title to the<br />
proposed site?<br />
NO If NO give details:<br />
Are there any other known constraints?<br />
Have updated searches been instructed<br />
and received?<br />
FALKIRK COUNCIL<br />
PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPOSALS<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Appendix 6a<br />
YES NO
3 PLANNING SERVICES:<br />
Is the site allocated in the Local <strong>Plan</strong>?<br />
If NO, is it likely to be suitable for residential<br />
development?<br />
Estimated unit capacity for affordable housing?<br />
Maximum storey height?<br />
Any specific policy considerations?<br />
Any known constraints on the site?<br />
Are any ecological surveys required?<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Cross Service Pre-Development Consultation Proforma<br />
YES NO If Yes no. of units:<br />
YES NO<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Will there be a requirement for open space YES NO If YES give details:<br />
on the site?<br />
Will the site require SUDS?<br />
Is a design statement required?<br />
Is the site of any archaeological importance?<br />
If YES will off site or on site<br />
provision be required?<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Any community infrastructure contribution YES NO If YES give details:<br />
(planning gain) requirements?<br />
Appendix 6a
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Cross Service Pre-Development Consultation Proforma<br />
Is there a requirement for a <strong>Strategic</strong> YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Environmental Assessment?<br />
Will any of the following be likely to be required on this site? Will pre-application consultation be carried out with the following statutory consultees?<br />
YES NO YES NO<br />
Flood Risk Assessment SEPA<br />
Contamination Report HSE<br />
Noise Impact Assessment SNH<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Others<br />
(Community Consultation/Local Members)<br />
HSE PADHI + Assessment<br />
Any other impact assessments?<br />
4 ROADS:<br />
Any specific policy considerations?<br />
Are there any adopted roads or paths?<br />
Will any traffic calming works be required as<br />
part of this development?<br />
Will a flood Risk Assessment be required?<br />
Will a Drainage Impact Assessment be required?<br />
Will the site require SUDS?<br />
If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Appendix 6a
Will a Transport Assessment be required?<br />
Will any stopping up orders be required?<br />
What are the parking requirements for the development?<br />
Any other general design considerations?<br />
5 EDUCATION:<br />
Are there any school capacity issues in the area?<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Cross Service Pre-Development Consultation Proforma<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
YES NO If YES give details:<br />
Will a financial contribution be required? YES NO If YES give details:<br />
6 NEIGHBOURHOOD OFFICE:<br />
Is the Neighbourhood Office supportive of the<br />
development project?<br />
YES NO If NO give details:<br />
Appendix 6a
Appendix 6b<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning & Land Supply - Development Project Checklist
Location:<br />
Development Partner:<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Development Project Checklist<br />
DEVELOPMENT CHECK LIST<br />
Development Agreement Completed: Yes No<br />
1. Development Team: 1.1 <strong>Housing</strong>:<br />
1.2 Development Partner:<br />
1.3 <strong>Council</strong> Solicitor:<br />
1.4 Developers Solicitor:<br />
1.6 <strong>Council</strong> Property Surveyor:<br />
1.7 <strong>Council</strong> Engineer (demolition) :<br />
1.8 <strong>Council</strong> QS (Demolition):<br />
1.9 RSL Architect<br />
1.10 RSL Quantity Surveyor/ EA<br />
1.11 RSL Engineer<br />
1.12 RSL <strong>Plan</strong>ning Supervisor<br />
1.13 RSL Clerk of Works<br />
1.14 Communities Scotland:<br />
1.15 <strong>Plan</strong>ning:<br />
1.16 Roads:<br />
1.17 Building Control:<br />
1.18 Developers Architect:<br />
p q<br />
2. Demolition: 2.1 development site:<br />
Yes No<br />
2.2 Detail addresses of all properties to be demolished:<br />
2.3 Date of Committee approval to demolish properties:<br />
2.4 Date <strong>Housing</strong> Property Services advised:<br />
2.5 Date requesting Scottish minister Consent:<br />
2.6 Date Scottish Ministers consent obtained:<br />
2.7 Total Number of properties to be demolished:<br />
2.8 Total number of occupied properties:<br />
2.9 Number of tenanted properties at Committee date:<br />
2.10 Number of owner occupier properties at committee date:<br />
2.11 Date DV appointed to negotiate acquisition of O/O properties:<br />
2.12 Are lock ups required to be demolished: Yes No<br />
2.13 Number of Lock up:<br />
2.14 Date vacant possession of lock ups secured:<br />
2.15 Date vacant possession of all tenanted properties secured:<br />
2.16 Date vacant possession of all O/O properties secured:<br />
2.17 Date Development Service Instructed to co-ordinate demolition:<br />
2.18 Date all service disconnection completed:<br />
2.19 Demolition site start date:<br />
2.20 Demolition Completion date:<br />
3. Land Ownership: <strong>Council</strong> Private<br />
4. <strong>Council</strong> Owned Land: 4.1 Size: (m2 + Hect)<br />
4.2 Date Confirming site is on HRA:<br />
4.33 Date L&A Title Check Obtained:<br />
4.4 Additional land Required to Access site: Yes No<br />
4.5 Date <strong>Plan</strong>ning & Roads confirm in principle agreement:<br />
4.6 Date Local Member Consulted:<br />
4.7 Date Declared Surplus by Committee:<br />
4.8 Scottish Ministers Consent required:<br />
4.9 Date requesting Scottish Ministers consent :<br />
4.10 Date Scottish Ministers consent obtained:<br />
1<br />
Appendix 6b<br />
Lead Contact Details
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Development Project Checklist<br />
5. Private Owned land: 5.1 Details of Owner:<br />
5.2 In Principle Agreement to Sell: Yes No<br />
5.3 Land Valuation:<br />
6. DV Valuation: 6.1 Date DV requested to value land:<br />
6.2 Date DV valuation Received:<br />
6.3 Market Value:<br />
6.4 Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Value:<br />
6.5 Date Site/Environmental Investigation Instructed:<br />
6.6 Any Abnormal: Yes No<br />
6.7 Are any of the following present on the site:<br />
Telewest: Yes No<br />
Transco: Yes No<br />
Scottish Power: Yes No<br />
Scottish Water: Yes No<br />
Telecoms: Yes No<br />
Stopping Up Order Required: Yes No<br />
Japanese Knotweed: Yes No<br />
Coal Board Report: Yes No<br />
Existing Wayleaves: Yes No<br />
Archaeological Check Required: Yes No<br />
Others: Yes No<br />
Antonine wall : Yes No<br />
Conditional missives concluded subject to <strong>Plan</strong>ning:<br />
Date Missives Concluded:<br />
Final Site transfer Value:<br />
Date of Possession:<br />
7. Development: 7.1 <strong>Housing</strong> Needs Analysis Yes No<br />
7.2 ODJU Publication Required Yes No<br />
7.3 Date Design Team Appointed<br />
7.4 Design Team Novated Yes No<br />
7.5 <strong>Housing</strong> Mix Yes No<br />
7.6 Design Brief Yes No<br />
7.7 Total Number of Units: Yes No<br />
7.8 Agree <strong>Housing</strong> Tenure Yes No<br />
7.9 Rents Assessed by <strong>Housing</strong> Management Yes No<br />
7.10 Design/ Specification Agreed with H/M Yes No<br />
7.11 Site Investigation/ Desk Top Study Completed Yes No<br />
7.12 Environmental Impact Assessment Completed Yes No<br />
7.13 Traffic Impact Assessment Completed Yes No<br />
7.14 Procurement Strategy Agreed Yes No<br />
7.15 Tenant participation Strategy Agreed Yes No<br />
7.16 <strong>Plan</strong>ning Permission Yes No<br />
7.17 Building Warrant Approval<br />
7.18 Road Construction Consent<br />
Yes No<br />
7.19 Road Bond Yes No<br />
7.20 Collateral Warranties (incl. PI confirmation) Yes No<br />
2<br />
£<br />
£<br />
£<br />
Appendix 6b
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Development Project Checklist<br />
7.21 Sustainability / Innovation Requirements Yes No<br />
7.22 Total Estimated Development Cost:<br />
7.23 Estimated Funding Requirements:<br />
7.24 HAG Acquisition to CS Yes No<br />
7.25 Cost <strong>Plan</strong> Submission to CS Yes No<br />
7.26 Tender submitted to CS Yes No<br />
7.26 Initial F10 Notification Yes No<br />
7.27 Tender Approval Received from CS<br />
7.28 Form of Building Contract<br />
Yes No<br />
7.29 Approved HAG Limit £<br />
7.30 Approved Other Funding £<br />
7.31 Assumed Total Rental/ Sales Income £<br />
7.32 KPI's Compiled and Agreed Yes No<br />
7.33 Contractors Insurance in Place Yes No<br />
7.34 Performance Bond Required Yes No<br />
7.35 Asbestos Survey Completed Yes No<br />
Appendix 6b<br />
7.36 Amount of L & A Damages £ Per Week<br />
7.37 Pre-Start H&S <strong>Plan</strong> in Place<br />
7.38 Site Start:<br />
Yes No<br />
7.39 Stage 2 & 3 Requirements Identified/ Actioned Yes No<br />
7.40 Sectional Completion Dates Yes No<br />
7.41 Completion Date:<br />
7.42 Receipt of Habitation Certificates Yes No<br />
7.43 Actual rental Income £<br />
7.44 HAG PC Reconciliation Yes No<br />
7.45 Issue of Making Good Defects Certificate Yes No<br />
7.46 Issue of Final Certificate Yes No<br />
7.47 Receipt of Secure by Design Certification Yes No<br />
7.48 Receipt of Health & Safety File Yes No<br />
7.49 LCC Elemental Breakdown to LinK Property Yes No<br />
7.50 Residents Satisfaction Survey distributed Yes No<br />
7.51 Section 66 Consent Required Yes No<br />
8.0 Risk Assessment 8.10 Initial Risk Assessment Board Approval Yes No<br />
8.20 Final Risk Assessment Board Approval Yes No<br />
8.30 Reserve matters concluded Yes No<br />
9.0 Nominations 9.10 Total Agreed Nominations: Yes No<br />
9.20 Actual Nominations from <strong>Council</strong> List: Yes No<br />
10.0 Amendments 10.1 Checklist Amendments Date Ref. No.<br />
3<br />
Date Ref. No.<br />
Date Ref. No.
Appendix 7<br />
Resources - Project Summary
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Corporate & Neighbourhood<br />
Services<br />
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Project Summary<br />
Appendix 7
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Programme (AHIP)<br />
Projects Completed Since 2009 SHIP Submission<br />
Lomond Drive, Langlees<br />
This project involved the demolition of 3 blocks<br />
of <strong>Council</strong>-owned flats comprising 60 properties<br />
in the Dawson Regeneration Area. Link Group<br />
was completed on 9 th June 2009 and provided a<br />
total of 32 dwellings comprising: 10 shared<br />
ownership, 17 rented and 5 shared equity<br />
properties.<br />
Lomond Drive, Langlees<br />
Wood Street, Grangemouth<br />
The project involved the demolition of 6<br />
<strong>Council</strong>-owned blocks of flats comprising 98<br />
dwellings. Link Group have built a total of 73<br />
new affordable homes comprising: 46 social<br />
rented, 16 shared ownership, 11 shared<br />
equity properties and these were completed<br />
in June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Wood Street, Grangemouth<br />
Craigleith Road, Grangemouth<br />
This project involved the demolition of 3<br />
blocks of <strong>Council</strong>-owned flats comprising 72<br />
dwellings. Link Group have delivered 32<br />
social rented units apportioned between<br />
themselves and Paragon <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Associations. This scheme was completed in<br />
March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
The opening of Craigleith Road, Grangemouth with Alex<br />
Neil, Minister for <strong>Housing</strong> & Communities on 7th July <strong>2010</strong><br />
Torwoodlea, Larbert<br />
This project was developed in partnership with<br />
Link <strong>Housing</strong> Association and Persimmon<br />
Homes and provided 43 social rented<br />
properties. This project was completed in<br />
May <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Torwoodlea, Larbert
Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> Programme (AHIP)<br />
Projects Currently on Site<br />
Mayfield Drive, Longcroft<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> is working in partnership with<br />
Link Group to provide 16 social rented<br />
properties on this site. Link acquired the site<br />
from <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and work started in early<br />
February this year with an estimated<br />
completion in autumn <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Mayfield Drive under construction<br />
Layout - Mayfield Drive, Long-<br />
Elevation - Mayfield Drive, Longcroft<br />
McTaggart Avenue, Denny<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> is working in partnership with<br />
Horizon <strong>Housing</strong> Association to deliver 10 social<br />
rented units of which 2 are designated for<br />
special needs. Horizon acquired the site from<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and Paragon <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Association. The project started on site in<br />
February <strong>2010</strong> with an estimated completion in<br />
early 2011.<br />
McTaggart Avenue, Denny - artists ’ impression<br />
View from the north - artists impression<br />
McTaggart Avenue, Denny - on site
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme<br />
Current Year - <strong>2010</strong>/11<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding<br />
Kingdom <strong>Housing</strong> Association is working in<br />
partnership with Persimmon Homes to deliver<br />
70 properties over 3 separate phases of<br />
development. This project is within the Polmont<br />
& Rural South area and completion of the<br />
properties will make a contribution in meeting<br />
the shortfall of affordable housing within the<br />
area. Phase 1 of the project will provide 28<br />
properties for general needs rent.<br />
Site Layout - Overton Crescent, Redding<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding - elevations<br />
Bellsdyke Hospital, Larbert<br />
Link Group are working in partnership with<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and Persimmon Homes to<br />
deliver 67 properties over 3 separate phases<br />
of development. The project is within the<br />
Larbert/ Stenhousemuir & Rural North area<br />
and completion of the properties will make a<br />
contribution to meet an identified local<br />
housing need in the this area. The Larbert/<br />
Stenhousemuir & Rural North area has the<br />
largest shortfall of affordable housing in the<br />
whole of the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area. Phase 1 of<br />
the project will provide 22 properties for<br />
general needs rent.<br />
Draft Layout - Bellsdyke, Larbert<br />
Bellsdyke Hospital Site, Larbert
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme (continued)<br />
Bridge Street, Bonnybridge<br />
Link Group is working in partnership with a<br />
private developer to deliver 6 amenity<br />
properties for rent in the centre of<br />
Bonnybridge. Link are on course to acquire<br />
the site in October <strong>2010</strong> with a site start<br />
anticipated in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Year 1 - 2011/12<br />
Bellsdyke Hospital, Larbert - Phase 2<br />
Phase 2 of the project will provide 27 properties<br />
for shared equity.<br />
Park Terrace, Brightons<br />
The former British Legion Social Club site at<br />
Park Terrace, Brightons, was brought to the<br />
attention of Link Group by Eaglestone Homes<br />
Select Ltd with a view to buying the site and<br />
entering into a design and build contract with<br />
Link to develop 16 flats for social rent. Link<br />
Group have now acquired the site and the<br />
project has been granted full planning<br />
consent.<br />
Bridge Street, Bonnybridge<br />
Artist’s impression - Bridge Street<br />
Park Terrace, Brightons<br />
Park Terrace, Brightons - Elevations
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme (continued)<br />
Mary Street, Lauriston<br />
Key <strong>Housing</strong> Association own this property<br />
and plans to reconfigure the layout to create 2<br />
new dwellings. Key aims to meet the needs<br />
of existing and future tenants while creating<br />
more viable/ letable housing stock.<br />
Mary Street, Lauriston<br />
Year 2 - 2012/13<br />
Bellsdyke Hospital, Larbert - Phase 3<br />
Phase 3 of the project will provide 18 properties<br />
for general needs rent.<br />
Bellsdyke Hospital Site, Larbert<br />
Burnside Terrace, Camelon<br />
Key <strong>Housing</strong> Association plan to reconfigure<br />
the properties at 1 & 3 Burnside Terrace,<br />
Camelon to provide 4 new units for special<br />
needs. The Association aims to create a mix<br />
of units to meet future housing needs.<br />
Burnside Terrace, Camelon<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding - Phase 2<br />
Phase 2 of the project will provide 21 properties<br />
for general needs rent.<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding - elevations<br />
Overton Crescent, Redding - Phase 3<br />
Phase 3 of the project will provide 21 properties<br />
for 13 properties for general needs rent and 10<br />
shared equity properties.<br />
Glenburn Road, Hallglen<br />
Loretto <strong>Housing</strong> Association purchased the site<br />
at Glenburn Road, Hallglen in <strong>2010</strong> and aim to<br />
provide a mix of 25 properties general and<br />
special needs housing for rent. The site<br />
currently has planning consent for flats,<br />
however, Loretto aim to submit a new<br />
application with a revised layout.<br />
Glenburn Road, Hallglen
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme (continued)<br />
Year 3 - 2013/14<br />
Auchincloch Drive, Banknock<br />
This site is in <strong>Council</strong> ownership and has<br />
been declared surplus with an agreement to<br />
transfer the land to the Link Group at<br />
affordable land use value. The site is<br />
accessed through land in private ownership,<br />
however, Link has come to an agreement<br />
over the access with the Greenbelt Company<br />
to allow the project to proceed. The project<br />
aims to deliver 30 properties for social rent to<br />
meet identified local housing needs. Link<br />
Groups application for detailed planning consent<br />
was refused by <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />
Committee in September <strong>2010</strong>. Link<br />
Group are considering lodging an appeal.<br />
Auchincloch, Banknock<br />
Site Layout - Auchincloch, Banknock detailing the<br />
orientation of the sun<br />
Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood<br />
This site is owned by MacTaggart & Mickel<br />
and is subject to <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Affordable<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Policy. MacTaggart & Mickel are in<br />
discussions with the Link Group and intend to<br />
provide the affordable units through a<br />
partnership project. It is anticipated the<br />
development could provide approximately 27<br />
social rented units to meet identified local<br />
housing needs.<br />
Site Layout-Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood<br />
Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
This site is in private ownership and has<br />
planning consent for 27 flats. Hanover<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Association is in discussion with the<br />
owner and aims to utilise the site for social<br />
rented housing.<br />
Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong>
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme (continued)<br />
Year 4 - 2014/15<br />
Canal Walk, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Road, Bonnybridge<br />
The Link Group have purchased the site at<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> Road, Bonnybridge from Antonine<br />
Developments. The site currently has planning<br />
consent for 35 flats, however, Link will be<br />
submitting a revised planning application with a<br />
revised layout.<br />
Canal Walk, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Road, Bonnybridge<br />
Canal Walk, Bonnybridge—Site Layout<br />
Vellore Road, Maddiston<br />
Link Group are working in partnership with Bett<br />
Homes to provide 18 properties for rent. The<br />
site owner is in the process of applying for<br />
planning consent for residential use.<br />
Vellore Road, Maddiston-Location <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Vellore Road, Maddiston
2011-16 <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (SHIP)<br />
Main Programme (continued)<br />
Year 5 - 2015/16<br />
Westquarter Social Club, Westquarter<br />
Hanover <strong>Housing</strong> Association is in<br />
discussions with the private owner of the site<br />
and aims to provide 14 general needs units<br />
for rent. The completion of the properties will<br />
help to reduce the shortfall of affordable<br />
housing in the Polmont & Rural South area<br />
which is a priority for <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Westquarter Social Club, Westquarter<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
The site is part of 2 phased development<br />
project and Weslo <strong>Housing</strong> Management have<br />
entered into discussions with the owner of the<br />
site. Phase 1 will deliver 22 properties for main<br />
stream rent and Phase 2 will deliver another 22<br />
mainstream properties for rent.<br />
Grahamston Quay, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - Draft Layout<br />
Edward Avenue, Larbert<br />
Link Group are in discussions with the site<br />
owner of Edward Avenue, Larbert. The site<br />
already has planning consent for 27 flat, however,<br />
the owner is currently in discussions with<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning regarding alternative layouts for the<br />
site.<br />
Artists illustration of completed site at Edward Avenue,<br />
Larbert<br />
Edward Avenue, Larbert
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme - Completed Projects<br />
Sawers Avenue, Denny<br />
This site formed part of the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
New Build Programme and delivered 8<br />
properties which included a mix of special/<br />
general needs. The project secured £200,000<br />
funding from the Scottish Government in 2009<br />
and was completed in May <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Sawers Avenue, Denny<br />
Chisholm Place, Grangemouth<br />
This project involved the demolition of one<br />
block of flats compromising 21 properties.<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> has been granted planning<br />
consent to provide 12 new properties on the<br />
site to be built by the <strong>Council</strong>’s Corporate &<br />
Neighbourhood Services. The <strong>Council</strong> has<br />
also secured £300,000 funding from the<br />
Scottish Government for this, with the balance<br />
being provided predominantly through<br />
prudential borrowing by <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Chisholm Place, Grangemouth<br />
Carse Crescent, Lauriston<br />
This site formed part of the <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
New Build Programme and has delivered 4<br />
properties - 2 special needs and 2 general<br />
needs. The project secured £100,000 funding<br />
from the Scottish Government and was<br />
completed in July <strong>2010</strong>.<br />
Carse Crescent, Lauriston<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme - Projects on Site<br />
Chequers, Hallglen<br />
This site is in <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ownership and<br />
forms part of the <strong>Council</strong>’s New Build<br />
Programme. The redevelopment of the<br />
cleared site and adjacent land will provide a<br />
mix of 18 properties for special/ general<br />
needs. <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has secured £450,000<br />
funding from the Scottish Government for the<br />
project and the balance will be provided by<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> predominantly through<br />
prudential borrowing.<br />
Site Layout-Chequers, Hallglen
Shiel Gardens, Langlees<br />
This project is currently on site and will<br />
provide 20 properties. <strong>Plan</strong>ning consent was<br />
granted on 24th March <strong>2010</strong> and a<br />
construction contract was awarded to JB<br />
Bennett Ltd on 29th March <strong>2010</strong>. The project<br />
has secured £500,000 funding from the<br />
Scottish Government and the balance of<br />
£1.2m will be predominantly provided through<br />
prudential borrowing by <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Elevations at Shiel Gardens, Langlees<br />
Shiel Gardens, Langlees-Site Layout<br />
Carron Road/ Millflats Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
This site is part of two distinct blocks and<br />
demolition of Block B has been completed.<br />
10 new <strong>Council</strong> properties will be provided for<br />
rent on this site . <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has secured<br />
£250,000 funding from the Scottish<br />
Government and the remaining balance of<br />
£1.175m is being predominantly funded<br />
through prudential borrowing.<br />
Carron Road/ Millflats Street - Prior to Demolition<br />
Layout - Carron Road/ Millflats Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
Elevation - Carron Road/ Millflats Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong>
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme - <strong>Plan</strong>ned Projects<br />
Cadzow Avenue, Bo’ness<br />
This project forms part of the <strong>Council</strong>’s New<br />
Build Programme and has secured £600,000<br />
funding from the Scottish Government, with<br />
the balance of £1.85m being provided by<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> predominantly through<br />
prudential borrowing. The project will deliver<br />
24 properties for rent.<br />
Site Layout - Cadzow Avenue, Bo’ness<br />
Cadzow Avenue West, Bo’ness<br />
Elevations - Cadzow Avenue, Bo’ness<br />
Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
The site forms part of the two distinct blocks on<br />
Carron Road, the demolition of Block A is<br />
pending and when the project is complete the<br />
site will provide 36 properties for rent. <strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong> has secured £1.08m funding from the<br />
Scottish Government with the remaining<br />
balance of £1.937m being predominantly<br />
funded through prudential borrowing.<br />
Carron Road/ Haugh Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> - Initial site layout
<strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Corporate & Neighbourhood<br />
Services
Appendix 8<br />
Project Prioritisation - Scoring Criteria and RSL Project Assessments
Project<br />
No.<br />
Project Name/Address RSL<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Needs<br />
Assessment Area<br />
Land Ownership<br />
Statutory<br />
Approvals<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Prioritisation Scoring Matrix<br />
Contribution<br />
Towards the<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
objectives<br />
Contribution<br />
Towards Priority<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Need<br />
Current Land Use Financial Appraisal Regeneration Total Score Priority Ranking<br />
26 Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 2) Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
6 10 5 6 6 6 5 44 1st =<br />
27 Bellsdyke, Larbert (Phase 3) Link<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
6 10 5 6 6 6 5 44 1st =<br />
24 Park Terrace, Brightons Link Polmont & Rural South 10 10 5 4 5 5 2 41 2nd =<br />
15 Burnside Terrace, Camelon Key Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> 10 8 5 5 6 5 2 41 2nd =<br />
14 Mary Street, Lauriston Key Polmont & Rural South 10 8 5 4 6 5 1 39 3rd<br />
2 Phase 2 Overton, Redding Kingdom Polmont & Rural South 6 8 5 4 4 6 5 38 4th =<br />
3 Phase 3 Overton, Redding Kingdom Polmont & Rural South 6 8 5 4 4 6 5 38 4th =<br />
37 Glenburn Road, Hallglen Loretto <strong>Falkirk</strong> 10 4 6 5 4 5 4 38 4th =<br />
20 Auchincloch, Banknock Link Denny & Banknock 8 8 5 3 4 4 5 37 5th<br />
13 Bank Street, <strong>Falkirk</strong> Hanover Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> 4 10 4 5 4 2 5 34 6th =<br />
22 Carrongrove Mill, Stoneywood Link Denny & Banknock 6 8 5 3 6 4 2 34 6th =<br />
21 Canal Walk, Bonnybridge Link Denny & Banknock 10 4 5 3 4 5 2 33 7th<br />
36 Vellore Road, Maddiston Link Polmont & Rural South 4 8 5 4 4 2 4 31 8th<br />
10 Westquarter Social Club, Westquarter Hanover Polmont & Rural South 4 6 5 4 5 2 4 30 9th<br />
4<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay,<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 1)<br />
28 Edward Avenue, Stenhousemuir Link<br />
Weslo Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> 2 8 4 5 6 2 2 29 10th =<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
4 6 5 6 4 2 2 29 10th =<br />
5<br />
Gowan Avenue, Grahamston Quay,<br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong> (Phase 2)<br />
Weslo Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> 2 8 4 5 6 2 2 29 10th =<br />
29 Dennyloanhead (Phase 1) Link Denny & Banknock 2 8 5 3 4 2 5 29 10th =<br />
30 Dennyloanhead (Phase 2) Link Denny & Banknock 2 8 5 3 4 2 5 29 10th =<br />
31 Dennyloanhead (Phase 3) Link Denny & Banknock 2 8 5 3 4 2 5 29 10th =<br />
38 Whitecross SIRR Link Polmont & Rural South 2 4 6 4 6 2 5 29 11th =<br />
32 Banknock SIRR (Phase 1) Link Denny & Banknock 2 4 5 3 6 2 6 28 12th =<br />
33 Banknock SIRR (Phase 2) Link Denny & Banknock 2 4 5 3 6 2 6 28 12th =<br />
34 Banknock SIRR (Phase 3) Link Denny & Banknock 2 4 5 3 6 2 6 28 12th =<br />
35 Glenfair Nursery, Camelon Link <strong>Falkirk</strong> 4 2 5 5 5 2 4 27 13th<br />
6 Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 1) Weslo<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
4 2 5 6 4 2 2 25 14th =<br />
7 Graham Terrace, Airth (Phase 2) Weslo<br />
Stenhousemuir/ Larbert<br />
& Rural North<br />
4 2 5 6 4 2 2 25 14th =<br />
11 The Hurlet, Tamfourhill Hanover Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> 2 2 4 5 5 2 2 22 15th<br />
12 Main Street, Polmont Hanover Polmont & Rural South 2 4 5 4 1 2 2 20 16th<br />
16 John Davidson Drive, Dunipace Horizon Denny & Banknock 2 0 4 3 0 2 2 13 17th<br />
8 *Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 1) Weslo Bo'ness *5 0 4 2 1 2 2 11 18th =<br />
9 *Douglas Drive, Bo'ness (Phase 2) Weslo Bo'ness *5 0 4 2 1 2 2 11 18th =<br />
* Site partly owned by <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and Weslo<br />
Assessment Criteria<br />
Main SHIP Projects<br />
Shadow SHIP Projects<br />
Appendix 8
Assessment Criteria<br />
Land Ownership Site in RSL ownership<br />
Statutory Approvals<br />
Contribution Toward the <strong>Council</strong>’s <strong>Strategic</strong> Objectives<br />
Contribution Towards Priority <strong>Housing</strong> Need<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Project Prioritisation Scoring Matrix<br />
Score<br />
10 8 6 4 2 0<br />
Full <strong>Plan</strong>ning consent obtained/<br />
Not Required<br />
Project meets all 5 <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
objectives with 2004-09 LHS<br />
Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> (Larbert, S'muir &<br />
RN)<br />
Site in <strong>Council</strong> Ownership with RSL has formal agreement to buy<br />
approval to dispose to RSL partner with Land owner<br />
Currently in for full planning<br />
consent<br />
Outline planning obtained PPP obtained<br />
RSL in negotiation with land owner<br />
land owner has made contact with<br />
RSL<br />
No application submitted but<br />
allocated for residential use in<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Appendix 8<br />
No contact between RSL & land<br />
owner<br />
Not allocated for residential within<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong><br />
6 5 4 3 2 1<br />
Project meets 4 out of 5 <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Objectives with 2004-09 LHS<br />
Project meets 3 out of 5 <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Objectives with 2004-09 LHS<br />
Project meets 2 out of 5 <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Objectives with 2004-09 LHS<br />
Project meets 1 out of 5 <strong>Strategic</strong><br />
Objectives with 2004-09 LHS<br />
Wider <strong>Falkirk</strong> (other area) Polmont & RS Denny & Bonnybridge Bo'ness Grangemouth<br />
Current Land Use Brownfield/ Refurbishment Derelict Vacant White land Greenfield Open Space<br />
Financial Appraisal<br />
Regeneration<br />
Block B approval in place or the<br />
projects is a continuation of a<br />
phased development<br />
Development is integral to a<br />
strategic regeneration project<br />
RSL able and willing to front fund<br />
project<br />
Development forms part of a<br />
strategic regeneration project/<br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> Land release for<br />
residential development<br />
RSL able to raise PF and bring<br />
project in within SG benchmark<br />
targets. Route 1 funding.<br />
Development located within SIMD<br />
lowest 15% area<br />
RSL willing to contribute to costs<br />
over & above PF<br />
Development located within<br />
identified neighbourhood priority<br />
area<br />
RSL still to complete full financial<br />
appraisal<br />
Development not part of wider<br />
priority area but will contribute<br />
positively to the local community<br />
Project does not meet any of the<br />
strategic objectives of the 2004-09<br />
LHS<br />
RSL unable to raise PF<br />
Development will not add to the<br />
regeneration of an area
Appendix 9<br />
New Funding Models and Procurement - Average <strong>Housing</strong> Association<br />
Grant Requirements
Actual HAG Rent Units Approved - 2006-<strong>2010</strong><br />
<strong>Falkirk</strong><br />
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2011 - 2016<br />
Scottish Government Average <strong>Housing</strong> Association Grant Figures 2006 - <strong>2010</strong><br />
Project Id Client Name Project Name Tender Date Units Beds Average size Total Cost Grant Grant per Unit Grant Rate %<br />
20712 LINK GROUP LINK, LARACH/ CRAIGLEITH ROAD, GRANGEMOUTH 06/11/2006 32 122 3.81 4,256,074.00 2,718,343.96 84,948.25 63.87<br />
22629 LINK GROUP LINK, LOCHSIDE CRESCENT, REDDING, FALKIRK 29/03/2007 16 53 3.31 1,865,136.00 1,278,115.00 79,882.19 68.53<br />
Total 2006-2007 48 175 3.65 6,121,210 3,996,459 83,259.56 65.29<br />
25687 LINK GROUP LINK, LOMOND DRIVE/SHIEL GARDENS, (HAG) RENT 22/02/2008 13 47 3.62 1,380,926.00 938,302.39 72,177.11 67.95<br />
22628 LINK GROUP LINK, KENNARD STREET, FALKIRK 19/03/2008 10 30 3.00 1,123,305.00 795,236.26 79,523.63 70.79<br />
25431 LINK GROUP LINK, WOOD STREET, (HAG) G/MOUTH RENT, SITE 1 24/03/2008 26 114 4.38 3,152,775.00 2,097,727.23 80,681.82 66.54<br />
27100 LINK GROUP LINK, WOOD STREET, SITE 2 (HAG) RENT 24/03/2008 8 24 3.00 864,126.00 608,984.07 76,123.01 70.47<br />
Total 2007-2008 57 215 3.77 6,521,132 4,440,250 77,899.12 68.09<br />
28766 LINK GROUP LINK, TORWOODLEA, LARBERT, ACQ 2ND TRANCHE, ACCA 24/03/2009 43 144 3.35 5,311,426.00 3,314,885.00 77,090.35 62.41<br />
Total 2008-2009 43 144 3.35 5,311,426 3,314,885 77,090.35 62.41<br />
23044 LINK GROUP LINK MAYFIELD DR LONGCROFT/GLASGW RD SITE B 31/08/2009 16 56 3.50 1,698,122.00 965,208.36 60,325.52 56.84<br />
22742 HORIZON H A LTD HORIZON, MCTAGGART AVENUE, DENNY, FALKIRK 18/12/2009 10 26 2.60 1,301,737.00 765,391.97 76,539.20 58.80<br />
Total 2009-<strong>2010</strong> 26 82 3.15 2,999,859 1,730,600 66,561.55 57.69<br />
Information supplied by Scottish Government <strong>Housing</strong> & <strong>Investment</strong> Directorate Sep <strong>2010</strong><br />
174 616 3.54 20,953,627 13,482,194 77,484 64.34<br />
Appendix 9
SHIP MAPS
Maps - On Site Projects
Maps - <strong>2010</strong>/11 Projects
Maps - SHIP Project Maps
Maps - Shadow SHIP Maps
Maps - <strong>Falkirk</strong> <strong>Council</strong> New Build Programme Projects
Sub Area Maps