H - University Library

More documents

Recommendations

Info

We are gravely disappointed with the actions of Illinois Rep. Paul Stone, D-Sullivan on bills that deal with student needs. As a member of the House Higher Education Committee, Stone voted against bills that would place student representatives on the University Board of Trustees. And this week, Stone was instrumental in killing a bill which would have allowed the sale of liquor in the Illini Union. In the first committee vote , the bill was defeated six to five. One legislator was going to change his vote, which would have allowed the bill to pass, but Stone called for a quorum. Some committee members had left the committee chambers since the first vote, so a quorum was not present and the bill failed. Although Stone was technically correct in asking for a quorum count, there is a long-standing custom that the proper time for a quorum count is when a bill is first voted on, and committee members may later change their votes even Stone's record disappointing if a quorum is no longer present. Stone's action kept the vote from reflecting the true sentiments of the committee, and resulted the bill being killed through parliamentary trickery. The reason for Stone's actions on these two issues is clearly the opposition of the University, which strongly opposes having liquor sold in the Union (although it has a special-interests bill pending in the General Assembly to allow it to be sold at the Levis Faculty Center ) and wishes to keep students off the Board of Trustees, preferring to deal with them through powerless committees and professional flak men. We would remind Stone that many of the votes that elected him last fall came from the large student population in Champaign- Urbana, and that his primary responsibility is to his constituency, not the special interests located in his district. And we would warn students to take note of this example and not follow the habit of blindly voting Democratic in local elections, as they have shown a distressing tendency to do in recent elections. Although we do not condemn Stone completely as a state legislator—we support, for example, his bill to increase the financial aid benefits made available in Illinois—we suggest he compare the number of votes the University administration can cast with the number students control the next time he considers taking a stand like those he's taken in the last two weeks. Ed Epstein /On Nixonian gobbledygook I promise to try to be fair , to respect the man's lofty position and all that. But , still I must confess that President Nixon has me confused. I have subjected myself to the ordea l of wading through his two most recent statements on the sordid Watergate affair and find- myself left with more questions about who did what and when than before I started . The President's first statement on April 30, in which he axed his Prussian guards Wright We are glad to see that Joe Blaze, director of parking and transportation, has agreed to reconsider his plans to build a bicycle parking lot on the south end of the Quadrangle, and we hope he will make a sincere effort to find another location for the lot. The Quad has already been greatly reduced in size by the fencing off of the north end to allow grass to grow back, and is now barely large enough for the number of people who wish to use it during good weather. We would think that Haldeman and Ehrlichman and excommunicated John Dean, was a masterpiece of political mumbo-jumbo. In his little speech "from my heart" Nixon placed the blame on everyone else, but graciously accepted the responsibility for himself. Now, you may ask, and you should, just what does this mean? Well, if you did ask you wouldn't get an answer because, you see, the President has more important things to do, like rehearsing the Marine * iWJtl HWS TO SC05B HM/KWte TH^I^ Keep bike lots off the Quad maintaining the quality of one of the few pleasant places on this campus would take priority over building another parking lot . \ A number of alternative locations have been proposed for the parking lot. Even if none of them prove to be completely suitable, we strongly urge that they be used instead of the Quad. The University will always need space, particularly in the central Quad area, and if the principle of using Quad space gets started now, we Band in the "Internationale" in preparation for Big Leonid's big visit. At the time of that speech Nixon left the impression with his audience that this was his final, definitive statement on the matter that "has claimed far too much of my time and my attention." But, things being what they are in the U.S. of A. the President recently found it necessary to issue another, longer tract , which (will surprises never cease ) actually can easily foresee the day when it will be completely used up by parking lots , sidewalks, and buildings. At an institution as enormous, complicated and impersonal as the University of Illinois, a line has to be drawn between fulfilling the physical requirements of the institution and fulfilling the spiritual requirements of its students. We feel that line should, be drawn clearly and irrevocably around the Quad. said something. It told us that at heart Nixon is really a junior G-man and J. Edgar Hoover, in his closing years, was something of a civil libertarian. It seems Nixon wanted to improve domestic intelligence operations just after the college campuses blew up over his invasion of Cambodia . His plans included authorization for bugging and "surreptitious entry," or breaking and entering, or how about just plain burglary, which Illinois law says is good for not less than one year in prison. It also seems that Old J. Edgar, who according to some recent* reports, was slightly gaga during the last few years of his omnipotent rule of the FBI, regained lucidity long enough to kill off the plan. And, as we travel along the twisting route of Nixon's pronouncement, we learn that a special group was formed in the White House to stop leaks to the press and that other nasty group, the public. Cleverly called the "plumbers," these fellows undertook the patriotic effort to burglarize Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office. Apparently President Nixon wanted to convince the public that Ellsberg was not only a traitor but also a screwball. All these are pretty minor when compared with another revelation from Nixon. "Elements of the early post-Watergate reports led me to suspect, incorrectly, that the C.I.A. had been in some way involved," his speechwriter wrote. Now as an innocent, young American I would like to know why on earth the CIA, the FBI, the Committee to Reelect the President, the Women's Christian Temperance Union, the Audobon Society or the Marching Illini should bug and burglarize the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. And I would like to know why the President thought the CIA might be involved in such a crime. These questions might even provide Nixon with enough material for Phase 3 of his explanation of his. involvement in his Watergate affair.
TV column lacks knowledge To the Editor : This is in response to Rich Cahan's article in the Saturday Daily Illini in which he attacks local TV stations for their policy of not presenting editorial opinions. Mr. Cahan expresses concern that local newsmen and broadcast managers have no opinions. Well, I hold the strong opinion that Mr. Cahan doesn't know what he is writing about. He presumes to conclude that local stations do not editorialize as a way of denying the soapbox to those who might demand the chance to express opposing views in response to station editorials. How Machiavellian! He characterizes local media as unresponsive because they don 't editorialize. But, it can be shown that broadcast editorials are frequently counter to the public interest. Many local stations across the country present editorials. But those expressions have been universally criticized for their lack of depth and awareness of social programs. Why is this? It is because persons such as Mr. Cahan demand local editorials from broadcasters ill-equipped to handle such topics effectively. In cities the size of Champaign and Urbana , the normal procedure is for some copywriter to bat out an editorial, which is then read on the air by some unsuspecting schmuck from the executive wing. These "expressions of management opinion" usually lack any depth or thoughtfulness, but they usually keep people like Mr. Cahan quiet. The news department of such a station can offer little help. It rarely has the staff to spare, nor is its obligation to the expression of opinion . It's obligation is to balance and fairness, and it should not be used in the public expression of editorials. Another accurate scenario sees broadcasting management using editorials as a way of presenting their narrow pbint-ofview or vested interest. This raises a larger question. Is broadcasting management, noted for its adherence to profit and the status-quo, any more suitable a public opinion leader than the plumbing or funeral industries? What is required to serve the public interest through editorializing is a separate, autonomous editorial department, in whom management is willing to place its faith, and which is able to devote the time-and manpower to produce thoughtful and documented editorial expressions. Stations the size of those in this area are understaffed to meet the primary responsibility of producing local newscasts and programming, let alone devote much precious manpower to such ancillary functions. Despite criticism such as Mr. Cahan's, stations locally have recognized this problem, and have determined not to do the job if it can't be done well. To do it poorly is worse than not to do it at all. Mr. Cahan also fails to note that stations who have committed great amounts of time and manpower to their editorials frequently fail to have those editorials elicit any viewer response whatsoever. That great crowd of opposing spokesmen Mr. Cahan seems to think lurks just outside the studio door is largely non-existent. Stations who try to fulfill their fairness doctrine commitments recognize how hard it is to find even nominally qualified spokesmen for various social issues. As an examination of broadcast editorials locally, Mr. Cahan's article is pretty shallow. He completely ignores one major TV station, WILL, and no mention is made of editorializing on local radio. Such lapses give the lie to the articles authority. At the risk of pettyfogging, I might also mentjon that Mr. Cahan misspelled my name in the article, also misspelled the name of our program director Ken Ladage, and misquoted Mr. Ladage twice. Suffice it to say Mr. Cahan doesn't know what he i& writing about, and I hope his readers will make their own determinations as to his articles accuracy. PERRY REED News Director WICD Women sports coverage lacking To the Editor : A couple of weekends ago, Burma West broke a national record in the 440 yard dash for the Illini's women's track team at the national meet in California. The entire team took sixth in the nation. The Daily Illini's coverage included a full three sentences appearing on the second to the last page. Fred Eisenhammer , however , had recently Soapbox By A. BELDEN FIELDS This week Lou Gold received letters first from Vice-Chancellor Morton Weir and subsequently from Chancellor J. W. Peltason informing him that since the files were "confidential" neither he nor his chosen counsel would be permitted to see his file in order to prepare for appeals procedures. These letters from the top academic administrators on the campus reaffirm the position taken earlier by both the dean of LAS and the acting head of the political science department. The "confidentiality" of the files and the whole area of personnel matters was the excuse used by the dean and the LAS Executive Committee to evade the question of why Gold was being denied promotion and tenure (i.e. dismissed) and the lack of a Ph.D. cited as the reason when at least one other person was so rewarded without a Ph.D. Given the inequality of application of standards if the Ph.D. issue was the determining one in the Gold case, I proposed a resolution at the LAS faculty meeting which would oblige the LAS Executive Committee, of which the dean is chairman, to explain themselves. They ducked the issue, claiming that they could not discuss the specifics of the case because that would violate the rule of "confidentiality" in personnel cases. This is our own little version of Executive Privilege, a concept which almost served our national leader so well. Bureaucratic behavior shows remarkable similarities across institutional boundaries. Let us examine this concept vof "con*, devoted eight articles including pictures to his own personal problems in-men's track. It seems to be obvious that women's sports are not being covered adequately, but this sexist attitude displayed in the coverage of this last track meet and Burma's performance was the supreme example. PAM KINNARD A community forum Tenant supports landlord To the Editor: Recently, much publicity has been given to the "dispute" between tenants and management of Norrick and Morrow apartment buildings. Although I do not represent the management, as a current tenant, perhaps I can clarify their position. About 60 per cent ( 159 residents ) of the three apartment buildings signed the circulated petition demanding free August rent. Tenants were told that the petition was to unite all tenants so they could effectively realize their demands. Tenants had nothing to lose by signing, which may account for the relatively high number of signatures. However, it is hard to understand the underlying motives behind the petition. Tenants are not being forced to vacate their apartments on August 15, but the option is open to them and by doing so each tenant will save $35-$40rent. Another main concern of the tenants is that ads being run by the respective buildings for summer sublets say "Summer Sublets at Reduced Rates." Tenants are complaining because they feel the ads keep them from subletting at full rental rates, which is virtually impossible under any circumstances in the summer. Tenants are fidentiality" more closely. First, let us change the term to what I contend is a more honest one—secrecy. "Confidentiality" might be taken to connote that the subject of the file is being protected. This is obviously not the case here. The subject is being fired. The subject is seeking to gain access to his (or, under the present rules, not-his-butabout-him's) file for himself and his counsel. This is what is being denied under the rule of "confidentiality." While Gold has absolutely no objection to the whole file being made public to anyone who is interested, this is not what he and his counsel, the AFT local, are asking. So who is protected by this secrecy? A faculty colleague argued at the last LAS meeting that secrecy (he said "confidentiality ") protects the authors of documents which appear in the files. The argument here was that being so protected, the authors of letters and other documents will be more honest. It is interesting to see how this kind of argument is accepted by so many of us without reflection. It can surely be argued that the authors of such documents would be more honest if the subjects of the documents were aware of their contents and could refute contentions which they felt < were unfair or untrue—contentions which i can and do destroy careers. Arguing for ] secrecy on the rationale of securing more < honest appraisals is like arguing that better < trial procedure could be attained in the courts if the testimony of witnesses were < .withheld from the defendant and his counsel'. . - ¦ - ¦ to those who do not have the courage to confront others with what they believe to be honest assessments. But I do not believe that protection from embarrassment of those lacking such courage should override the right of people to know what is being placed in their files and to be in a position to refute what are felt to be untrue or unfair statements. For under such conditions appellate and review procedures are rendered totally inneffective. The subject and counsel have no way of knowing what they are defending against. Being placed in this Kafkesque position is the essence of what is referred to as "absence of due process." Aside from protecting the authors of documents, secrecy further protects administrators and administrative bodies, like deans and executive committees. It gives them great leeway and control. Again, it serves the same function that "Executive Privilege" and "National Security" serve for the national governmental bureaucracy. In effect they can do as they please since they are not accountable to anyone else and no one can gain access to the information necessary to challenge them . Monopolistic control over information is perhaps the single most important factor in administrative control and irresponsibility . How can one accuse the administration of discriminating on the basis of politics or life style if one does not know what is in the file? I strongly suspect that this latter function of secrecy is the crucial one in Gold's case. I am familiar with Gold's work and with the ' materials prepared and submitted by the :¦ ' .'Indeed, - anonyjmty is >l iess,! . ^mbjarras^ingi )v; • „, , • ',. , • - . - • ¦¦¦ , -¦ , •.'. ••' . ' ' >' •'• • '-!¦ . :¦' ». ' ¦;• < ' ' . ' . . 'IV J . ' *: ' i : also upset because they cannot offer a fall option and feel that these factors make subleasing "impossible." The manager has sublet several apartments through these ads. I doubt that an ad saying "Summer Sublets at Full Rates" would have gotten any response but a laugh. Subleasing is far from "impossible." After running an ad, we had no trouble subleasing our apartment—mainly because the shortening , of the lease allowed us to charge a lower price. Even more puzzling is the fact that the people who are complaining about subleasing are the same people who would rather occupy their apartments until August 31 than take the reduced rent for half of August. I have been a tenant in Norrick and Morrow's apartments for two years and have always found the management to be efficient and cooperative: It is my opinion (and many others') that they are being more than cooperative in regard to summer leases. Tenants seem to be trying to rip them off for all the free rent they can get by degenerating this "legal residency" issue into a type of public relations blackmail. KAREN WALKER Ad insults Jewish readers To the Editor : It is my belief that professional journalism dictates that The Daily Illini be open to public forum concerning whatever is carried within its pages. This is true whether it concerns newswriting or advertising in the newspaper ; it is a particular advertisement which I wish to comment on now. Wednesday's Daily Illini carried a paid advertisement entitled "I Couldn't Find Any Jesus Freaks." One such personal story related by a girl on the page I believe shamefully and purposelessly insulted many Jewish readers, myself included. The need to relate within the story of the way she no longer regarded her Jewishness as a Letters policy The Daily Illini regrets that it does not have the space to publish all the letters it receives, but it attempts to publish as many letters to the editor each year as possible. Letters should be limited to a maximum of 350 words, should be typewritten and double spaced, and must be signed by hand. The religion but only as a "cultural heritage" as well as maintaining that her Jewishness was used as an "excuse not to investigate this man Jesus Christ" is a tasteless affront to all Jewish readers. If the Key 73 movement (which of course has the right to print what they wish ) on colleges campuses is so intent and dedicated to personal religious principles, great—but perhaps the movement should concentrate on attempting to redeem fellow Christians rather than to attempt to make Jewish youth feel filled with "guilt, sin and remorse" as Key 73 would have us believe they should be. MIKE BELLOWS writer should include his or her address and phone number. Signatures will be withheld upon request, but preference is generally given to signed letters. The Daily Illini reserves the right to reject any letter which is libelous and to delete portions as may be necessary for copy fitting. political science department to the college in justification of its recommendation for promotion and tenure. It was an outstanding dossier which could neither embarrass a referee nor warrant a negative decision by the Executive Committee. Unless negative references were added to that file after it left the department, the executive committee made its decision not on the evidence submitted but despite it. If such negative pieces of evidence were subsequently added unknown to Gold and his colleagues in the department, they should be communicated to Gold and his counsel. But I doubt that they exist because in the college's communications with Gold over the decision it has constantly been the absence of the Ph.D. which has been cited as being of overriding concern to the Executive Committee. If Gold's file is exceptionally strong in his favor, if others are promoted and given tenure without a Ph.D., what does that leave as the true basis of the decision? Far from encouraging truthfulness and fairness, secret files are a cowardly evasion of responsibility. They can and do destroy lives and careers without any possibility of self-defense. They are antithetical to the principles of an open society and elementary due process. They have no proper place anywhere in our society and particularly not in our university. The time is long past due that we as faculty members exhibit enough courage to assure ourselves of fair and honest treatment .
Page 1 and 2: Parking deal nets $2,500-3,000 for
Page 3 and 4: Congressman commits suicide EASTON.
Page 5 and 6: Committee hears fund requests \By A
Page 7 and 8: Champaign to get bike traffic study
Page 9 and 10: House vote on school board bill pos
Page 11 and 12: Skolnick may testify on O'Hare cras
Page 13 and 14: Brandt; US-USSR meeting will affect
Page 15 and 16: Aristocrat admits to 'casual affair
Page 17 and 18: $196 million April trade surplus an
Page 19: • Alleged vote fraud spurs indict
Page 23 and 24: How to get through finals week—se
Page 25 and 26: Delicate Balance' to open in Studio
Page 27 and 28: Tradition Beer 'smuggling' stumbles
Page 29 and 30: Banks hike prime rate to 7%% . £ N
Page 31 and 32: Classified Ads ..I ArARTMENTSUBl,^.
Page 33 and 34: Classified Ads HELP WANTED Help wan
Page 35 and 36: Lee Eiibracht Illini baseball coach
Page 37 and 38: Wood wins 11th CHICAGO (AP ) - Wilb
Page 39 and 40: Gridders favor artificial turf By R

H - University Library

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?