The Impact of Relationship on Death Related Grief on Yoruba ...
The Impact of Relationship on Death Related Grief on Yoruba ...
The Impact of Relationship on Death Related Grief on Yoruba ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ozean Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Social Sciences 5(2), 2012<br />
Table 1: t-test Analysis Between Attitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Closely <strong>Related</strong> and Not Closely<br />
<strong>Related</strong> People to <strong>Death</strong> <strong>Related</strong> <strong>Grief</strong><br />
Group N Mea<br />
n<br />
Closely 767 76.3<br />
<strong>Related</strong><br />
3<br />
Not 630 76.9<br />
Closely<br />
<strong>Related</strong><br />
0<br />
P > 0.05 (Not significant)<br />
S.D df t.cal t.table<br />
7.7<br />
7<br />
8.6<br />
0<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> table above reveals that the mean difference between attitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> closely related and not closely related people is<br />
not significant at 0.05 level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> significance (t cal 1.298, t table 1.960). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> t cal is less than the t table. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
hypothesis there is no significant difference in the attitude to grief <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> people who are related and those not closely<br />
related is accepted.<br />
76<br />
1395<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> mean difference between attitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> closely related and not closely related is not significant at 0.05 level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
significance t cal 1,298, t table 1.960, p > 0.05 therefore the null hypothesis which states that there is not significant<br />
difference in the attitude to grief <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the people who are closely related to the deceased and those not closely related is<br />
accepted therefore there is no significant difference in the attitude to grief <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> people who are closely related to the<br />
deceased and those not closely related. This finding c<strong>on</strong>tradicts the finding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Silverman (2000) that the death <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />
child is always a major loss. Also Daggett (2002) asserted that the death <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a spouse is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the most emoti<strong>on</strong>ally<br />
stressful and disruptive events in life.<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
Based <strong>on</strong> the finding, above it is recommended that caregivers, counsellors and teachers should educate their clients<br />
about the necessity to develop and direct positive attitude to mourners and bereaved to victims <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> death related grief.<br />
Also prospective researchers should research into areas that will compare and c<strong>on</strong>trast other cultures to be able to<br />
find further the significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>gevity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> grief.<br />
1.298<br />
1.960