ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL - SOCIEDAD DE ERGONOMISTAS ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010 N430 Head circumference 53.9 56.0 57.7 53.5 59.0 N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 33.9 36.0 39.2 33.5 40.0 N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.4 14.3 15.2 12.3 15.9 N427 Head width 14.2 15.7 16.6 14.0 17.3 N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 19.9 23.0 25.0 19.4 25.3 N441 Head length 17.3 18.2 19.1 17.0 19.2 N420 Length of hand 16.5 18.1 20.0 16.3 20.1 N656 Length of the palm 9.4 10.5 12.7 9.4 19.2 N411 Width of palm 7.4 8.5 9.3 7.3 9.3 N402 Grip diameter 4.1 4.9 5.6 3.9 6.4 N758 Seat height sitting at the head 82.0 89.0 92.7 79.0 95.2 N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 72.7 78.5 82.1 69.0 82.6 N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 57.3 61.7 68.6 53.5 83.0 N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22.2 25.5 28.7 22.0 29.6 N856 Sitting thigh-high 14.2 16.2 18.3 13.7 19.8 N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 119.5 132.6 141.0 116.6 146.5 N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 112.9 122.8 130.1 107.8 136.3 N2FGM Height of sitting down 120.5 130.0 137.7 117.5 141.4 N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.1 41.0 45.3 36.5 45.3 N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 41.9 46.1 49.0 41.0 49.2 N194 Length from knee to back of chair 54.3 60.9 63.2 52.5 64.0 N678 Height from floor to knee back 36.9 41.9 45.0 36.6 45.0 N529 Height from floor to knee 47.3 54.2 58.2 47.0 58.5 N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 41.5 46.5 49.7 40.7 50.6 N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 36.9 42.9 45.1 36.1 45.3 N459 Seated hip width 36.9 38.2 45.2 36.6 46.2 N859 Width thighs with knees together 30.9 33.6 37.9 30.0 42.8 N775 Leg length 22.5 25.7 28.0 21.8 28.3 N777 Foot width 8.4 9.8 10.7 8.3 11.0 N776 High instep 6.9 8.1 9.4 6.3 9.9 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Working conditions are an important issue, so it should be taken into account when designing a workspace, thereby, the worker will feel more comfortable and secure and will result in higher productivity, lower absenteeism, fewer accidents, lower turnover, etc. To achieve this it is necessary to design each station or place of work according to the needs of the population that will occupy this space, this implies knowing the dimensions of the population, if not known, it can hardly meet the target, however when known, can have an assurance that the highest percentage of people who use the work area, will have no problems in terms of size and awkward postures. By creating a product would be recommended to be used without problem by the largest number of users. The reality is that many products do not have the ability to adapt to 100% of users. For this you can follow two paths, the first would make products of various sizes in such a way that takes the opportunity to choose the one that best suits the needs of the user, the other would be to create products that are adjustable over a range measures, making it necessary to know the cost-benefits so that decision making is correct. The selection of some of the alternatives mentioned above would be facilitated if known anthropometric dimensions of the population that is expected to address. From the above highlights the importance of the results of this research. Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 32
Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010 From this research were obtained anthropometric records or letters of the working population of the city of Caborca, Sonora, Mexico, in the age ranges from 18 to 20, 21 to 23 and 24 to 27 years, and the letter Anthropometric women and men, those from Caborca and not originating in Caborca. These letters reflect the measures of the population having an age range from 18 to 27 years, within which 71% are men and 29% are women, 91% are from Caborca and 9% do not originate in Caborca. It is hoped that this research is another step towards the creation of anthropometric letters of the Mexican population, as currently there are very few records are. At the end of the investigation we can see the importance of the study of ergonomics and especially one of its branches which is the anthropometry, which is responsible for examining each of the different measures that make up the human body. Knowing these measures can be designed with a higher degree of reliability workstations, tools and equipment, safety equipment, clothing, etc. so we can give each user a more convenient and comfortable life. The recommendations can be made once this investigation is that it would be very interesting and important to continue to obtain anthropometric records of the total Mexican population, in order to develop equipment, workstations, tools and equipment as well as everything that needs dimensions of people, especially for the Mexican people and not have to take the actions of other countries and make adjustments later. 5. BIBLIOGRAPHY Annis 1996 James F. Annis. Aging effects on anthropometric dimensions important to workplace design. Annis Consulting, 503 Xenia Avenue, Yellow Springs, OH 45387, USA. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 18 (1996) 381 – 388. Baustista 2006 Ruben Bautista Balderas. Tablas antropométricas de adultos con enanismo de entre 18 a 45 años de edad para el diseño de mobiliario. Encuentro Universitario de Ergonomía. México, D.F., México 10 y 11 de Noviembre de 2006. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006. http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/Encuentro5-4.pdf. Cavassa 2004 César Ramírez Cavassa. Ergonomía y Productividad. Editorial LIMUSA. ISBN 968-18-3797-5. Mexico, D.F. 2004. De la Vega 2004 Enrique de la Vega. La investigación de la Ergonomia en Mexico. VI CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE ERGONOMÍA. Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México 26 al 29 de Mayo de 2004. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006 http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/6-6.pdf. Gosseens 1998 R.H.M. Goossens, C.J. Snijders, y T. Fransen. Biomechanical analysis of the dimensions of pilot seats in civil aircraft. Department of Product and Systems Ergonomics, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Jawalaan 9, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands. Department of Biomedical Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 9-14. 1998. Jung 2005 Hwa S.Jung. A prototype of an adjustable table and an adjustable chair for schools. Department of Industrial Engineering, Dongshin University, 252 Daehodong, Naju, Chonnam 520-714, Republic of Korea. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 955–969. Konz 1999: Stephan Konz. Diseño de sistemas de trabajo. Editorial Limusa. 1999. ISBN 968-18-1653-6. Maldonado 2003 Araceli Maldonado, Gilberto Mota, Juan Carlos Cano, Humberto Ponce y Sergio Chávez. Rediseño de estaciones de trabajo “secado de arcilla”. V CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE ERGONOMÍA. Ciudad Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 33
Page 1 and 2: ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL INVESTIGACIO
Page 3 and 4: ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL INVESTIGACIO
Page 5 and 6: Prefacio La Sociedad de Ergonomista
Page 7 and 8: ERGONOMICS AND EDUCATION Ergonomía
Page 9 and 10: Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaci
Page 23 and 24: 3.1 Programming stage Ergonomía Oc
Page 25 and 26: (DINBelg) 4. Percentiles are calcul
Page 27 and 28: 5. CONCLUSIONS Ergonomía Ocupacion
Page 39: Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaci
Page 69 and 70: . . Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investi
Page 71 and 72: . Table 12.Descriptive statistics f
Page 81 and 82: Classroom Ergonomía Ocupacional. I
Page 91 and 92:
Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaci
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
We compare the results: Ergonomía
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
2.4. RESULTS. Discoveries: Ergonom
Page 105 and 106:
5. REFERENCES. Ergonomía Ocupacion
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
4.5 Averages Ergonomía Ocupacional
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183:
show all

ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL - SOCIEDAD DE ERGONOMISTAS ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?