24.10.2012 Views

Moisture Separator Reheater - Balcke-Dürr Energietechnik Gmbh

Moisture Separator Reheater - Balcke-Dürr Energietechnik Gmbh

Moisture Separator Reheater - Balcke-Dürr Energietechnik Gmbh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 000<br />

7<br />

3<br />

6<br />

Ø 3 200<br />

2<br />

Ø 4 500<br />

Drain pipe<br />

Figure 4. <strong>Moisture</strong> separator and reheater of the<br />

Unterweser Nuclear Power Plant.<br />

5<br />

1<br />

4<br />

1 Fine separator<br />

2 Coarse separator<br />

3 <strong>Reheater</strong><br />

4 Turbine steam inlet<br />

5 Turbine steam outlet<br />

6 Heating steam inlet<br />

7 Heating steam condensate outlet<br />

Condensate outlet nozzle<br />

7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Agglomerator<br />

6<br />

<strong>Moisture</strong> <strong>Separator</strong> <strong>Reheater</strong>s<br />

1 Agglomerator<br />

2 Manhole<br />

3 1st vortex generator<br />

4 1st drain<br />

5 2nd vortex generator<br />

6 2nd drain<br />

7 HP turbine<br />

8 <strong>Moisture</strong> separator tank<br />

Figure 3. <strong>Moisture</strong> separator of the Atucha Nuclear Power Plant.<br />

e finned<br />

e plain<br />

j;<br />

5.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

steam condenses in the tubes and is collected<br />

in the lower header or the lower duct and directed<br />

out of the vessel whilst the<br />

turbine steam flows mainly in longitudinal<br />

flow around the bundle and is reheated in the<br />

process.<br />

As a result of the simple and distinct construction,<br />

this type of reheater installed in 10 plants<br />

of which 8 are in operation has functioned<br />

with practically no defects apart from damage<br />

to the guide shell in Unterweser. All reheaters<br />

of the first generation with plain tubes<br />

achieved better heating values than guaranteed<br />

but also higher pressure losses compared<br />

to the design data.<br />

e finned<br />

e plain<br />

NU plain<br />

8<br />

j finned<br />

j plain<br />

NU finned<br />

(apparent)<br />

10<br />

RE comparison<br />

4 2 5 105 2 5 106 0.05<br />

Figure 5. Comparison of the performance figures of fin tube and<br />

plain tube arrangement.<br />

10 3<br />

NU<br />

10 2<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!