15.10.2013 Views

The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN

The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN

The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

Due Diligence<br />

<strong>The</strong> frequency with which known and suspected Unregistered or Unlicensed Money<br />

Services Businesses were identified is evidence of due diligence and awareness on<br />

the part of the filing industry in recognizing and reporting such entities.<br />

Law Enforcement Support<br />

Several Other types of suspicious activity are regularly indicated and are of<br />

enormous value to specific law enforcement agencies, such as: Tax Evasion;<br />

Fraudulent W-2; Narcotics Trafficking; Currency Smuggling; and Employing<br />

Illegal Aliens.<br />

Reporting Patterns<br />

Filers utilizing the Other fixed-field could have been more accurate and descriptive<br />

by clearly designating a more appropriate category: Wire Transfer Fraud; BSA/<br />

Structuring/Money Laundering; Counterfeit Instrument (Other); Mortgage Loan<br />

Fraud; or Identity <strong>The</strong>ft.<br />

Moreover, several explanations involved Advanced Fee Scams or the Office of<br />

Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). <strong>FinCEN</strong> has published guidance related to<br />

Advanced Fee Scams (commonly referred to as Nigerian or 419 Scams). To consult<br />

these guidelines please refer to <strong>Issue</strong>s 4 and 7 of the <strong>SAR</strong> <strong>Activity</strong> <strong>Review</strong>. Access<br />

to this publication may also be obtained via the following link:<br />

http://www.fincen.gov/sarreviewissue4.pdf and<br />

http://www.fincen.gov/sarreviewissue7.pdf.<br />

In December 2004, <strong>FinCEN</strong> released interpretive guidance concerning reports<br />

filed related to the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control<br />

(“OFAC”). Details of this guidance may be reviewed in full via:<br />

http://www.fincen.gov/sarguidanceofac.html.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong>re can be no doubt as to the all-around usefulness of the wide reporting<br />

discretion offered by the Other characterization box and its descriptive line.<br />

<strong>The</strong> presented observations not only emphasize this, but also point out how the<br />

Other field can be more accurately used, specifically in those instances where the<br />

type of suspected violation is already offered as one of the other listed summary<br />

characterizations. Choosing the relevant available violation will additionally<br />

make for more accurate numeric tabulations and a better representation of those<br />

summary characterizations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!