The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN
The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN
The SAR Activity Review Issue 12 - FinCEN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
Due Diligence<br />
<strong>The</strong> frequency with which known and suspected Unregistered or Unlicensed Money<br />
Services Businesses were identified is evidence of due diligence and awareness on<br />
the part of the filing industry in recognizing and reporting such entities.<br />
Law Enforcement Support<br />
Several Other types of suspicious activity are regularly indicated and are of<br />
enormous value to specific law enforcement agencies, such as: Tax Evasion;<br />
Fraudulent W-2; Narcotics Trafficking; Currency Smuggling; and Employing<br />
Illegal Aliens.<br />
Reporting Patterns<br />
Filers utilizing the Other fixed-field could have been more accurate and descriptive<br />
by clearly designating a more appropriate category: Wire Transfer Fraud; BSA/<br />
Structuring/Money Laundering; Counterfeit Instrument (Other); Mortgage Loan<br />
Fraud; or Identity <strong>The</strong>ft.<br />
Moreover, several explanations involved Advanced Fee Scams or the Office of<br />
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). <strong>FinCEN</strong> has published guidance related to<br />
Advanced Fee Scams (commonly referred to as Nigerian or 419 Scams). To consult<br />
these guidelines please refer to <strong>Issue</strong>s 4 and 7 of the <strong>SAR</strong> <strong>Activity</strong> <strong>Review</strong>. Access<br />
to this publication may also be obtained via the following link:<br />
http://www.fincen.gov/sarreviewissue4.pdf and<br />
http://www.fincen.gov/sarreviewissue7.pdf.<br />
In December 2004, <strong>FinCEN</strong> released interpretive guidance concerning reports<br />
filed related to the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control<br />
(“OFAC”). Details of this guidance may be reviewed in full via:<br />
http://www.fincen.gov/sarguidanceofac.html.<br />
Conclusion<br />
<strong>The</strong>re can be no doubt as to the all-around usefulness of the wide reporting<br />
discretion offered by the Other characterization box and its descriptive line.<br />
<strong>The</strong> presented observations not only emphasize this, but also point out how the<br />
Other field can be more accurately used, specifically in those instances where the<br />
type of suspected violation is already offered as one of the other listed summary<br />
characterizations. Choosing the relevant available violation will additionally<br />
make for more accurate numeric tabulations and a better representation of those<br />
summary characterizations.