17.10.2013 Views

1999 BC Gas Utility Ltd. annual report - FortisBC

1999 BC Gas Utility Ltd. annual report - FortisBC

1999 BC Gas Utility Ltd. annual report - FortisBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Management Discussion and Analysis<br />

Operation and maintenance expenses decreased to<br />

$116.0 million in <strong>1999</strong> from $120.6 million in 1998. This<br />

decrease was due largely to productivity improvements<br />

flowing from a significant restructuring program at <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Gas</strong><br />

which was implemented in early 1998, offset by increases<br />

in other operating costs.<br />

Increased investment in gas plant in service resulted in<br />

depreciation and amortization expense rising to $62.4 million<br />

in <strong>1999</strong> from $61.3 million in 1998. Growth in the asset base<br />

of the Company resulted in property and other taxes<br />

increasing by $0.4 million to $31.9 million in <strong>1999</strong>.<br />

Financing costs increased to $87.4 million in <strong>1999</strong> from<br />

$86.8 million in the previous year largely as a result of higher<br />

debt balances and higher short-term interest rates during <strong>1999</strong>.<br />

Regulation and Rates – <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Utility</strong><br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> is regulated by the British Columbia Utilities<br />

Commission (“the <strong>BC</strong>UC”), which approves rates and tolls for<br />

services and the construction of facilities. Traditionally, rates<br />

have been set using the historical cost rate base and a rate<br />

of return. Since 1996, incentive-based regulation has been<br />

incorporated into the rate setting process in order to enhance<br />

both value to customers and returns to shareholders.<br />

The Company’s rates are based on estimates of a number<br />

of items, such as natural gas sales, cost of natural gas and<br />

interest rates. In order to manage the risks associated with<br />

some of these estimates, a number of regulatory deferral<br />

accounts are in place. The three most significant deferral<br />

accounts relate to the risks of weather, cost of natural gas,<br />

and interest rates.<br />

<strong>1999</strong> ANNUAL REPORT<br />

The deferral accounts for weather and cost of natural gas<br />

reduce the Company’s earnings exposure to these risks by<br />

deferring any variances between projected and actual gas<br />

consumption and gas costs, and refunding or recovering those<br />

variances in future customer rates. Transportation and sales<br />

services to industrial customers are not covered by these<br />

deferral accounts. As a result of these deferral accounts,<br />

changes in <strong>report</strong>ed revenues from year to year are caused<br />

mainly by changes in gas costs and other components of the<br />

Company’s cost of service which are recovered in customer<br />

rates. Changes in volumes of gas sold to residential and<br />

commercial customers due to weather or other factors have<br />

a less significant impact on <strong>report</strong>ed revenues.<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> also has in place short-term and long-term interest<br />

deferral accounts to absorb interest rate fluctuations. The<br />

Company’s interest deferral accounts effectively locked in the<br />

cost of short-term funds attributable to regulated assets at<br />

5% during <strong>1999</strong> and 1998.<br />

Allowed Return on Equity (“ROE”)<br />

The Company’s <strong>1999</strong> allowed ROE of 9.25% was determined<br />

based on a formula that applied a risk premium to a forecast<br />

of long-term Government of Canada bond yields. The decline<br />

from 10.0% in 1998 was a result of a decline in forecast longterm<br />

bond yields.<br />

In June <strong>1999</strong>, the <strong>BC</strong>UC held a public hearing to review<br />

the ROE formula, which had been in effect since 1995. In its<br />

decision dated August 26, <strong>1999</strong>, the <strong>BC</strong>UC amended the<br />

formula for the years beginning in 2000. The effect of these<br />

revisions is a lower allowed ROE for the Company with the<br />

new formula than with the old formula, under most potential<br />

long-term bond yields. For 2000, the Company’s allowed ROE<br />

has been set at 9.50% using the revised formula, reflecting<br />

higher forecasted long-term bond yields compared to the <strong>1999</strong><br />

ROE calculation. Had the original formula remained in place,<br />

the Company’s 2000 allowed ROE would have been 9.75%.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!