Final Report - Flathead County, Montana
Final Report - Flathead County, Montana
Final Report - Flathead County, Montana
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CAPACITY TO SERVE AREAS OUTSIDE OF EXISTING SERVICE AREA:<br />
Discussions with Lorin Lowry have focused on the willingness of the City and the<br />
capacity of the City’s wastewater system to serve existing development with septic<br />
systems in relative close proximity to the public sewer system. In general, Lorin was<br />
agreeable to the idea of removing septic systems and putting them on City sewer, but<br />
he said individuals would have to obtain City approval first. Additionally, he said it is<br />
City policy that these individuals then should hook up to City water and that City<br />
standards should also apply to roads, sidewalks, etc. To obtain City sewer service,<br />
these properties would have to annex into the City or, at a minimum, sign a statement<br />
waiving their right to protest annexation.<br />
Additional discussions were held concerning the capacities of the City’s sewer<br />
conveyance system and treatment facility. As previously mentioned, HDR completed a<br />
Wastewater Utility Plan in 2006 and, for the most part, this Utility Plan addressed<br />
Columbia Falls’ Potential Wastewater Utility Service Area with the purpose of<br />
determining the wastewater service population in the year 2025 and sizing the treatment<br />
plant accordingly to handle these flows.<br />
HDR’s report did not provide any modeling of the existing sewage conveyance<br />
system and lift stations to determine component capacities. HDR did make several<br />
recommendations on the lift stations but only based them on the age of equipment or<br />
operational problems with the stations, as reported to them by City personnel. The City<br />
has been completing some of these recommendations in-house as their annual budget<br />
allows. To date they have replaced both pumps at Lift Station #2 and one pump each at<br />
Lift Station Nos. 4 & 6. Pumps that have been replaced were replaced with the same<br />
pump model and capacity with no upsizing. Additionally, it was stated that any new<br />
sewer flows to Lift Station #2 would require an upgrade in wet well size.<br />
Although flows have not been modeled for the sewer conveyance system, it is<br />
the City’s opinion that some of the sewer lines and lift stations may be approaching<br />
capacity, however, they have not had any problems with sewer surcharges.<br />
Accordingly, future extensions of sewer mains will require sewer flow modeling to<br />
determine if the capacity exists to convey additional sewage to the treatment facility.<br />
Parts of the City’s wastewater treatment facility have been upgraded to year<br />
2025 projected flows as part of the Phase 1 improvements discussed earlier. Phase 2<br />
improvements were to take place in 2015, in part due to higher growth rates that were<br />
occurring from 2000 – 2006 when the report was written. The growth rate has slowed<br />
since this time period and, according to Lorin, there is now no big push to complete<br />
Phase 2 improvements. Taking on new users with existing septic systems may be an<br />
attractive alternative to the City to help make up for revenue lost due to stagnant growth<br />
and to help pay off the bonds used to finance Phase 1 improvements.<br />
Sewage Treatment in the <strong>Flathead</strong> Basin 21